Galactic Bulge Science

Similar documents
The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

ARGOS IV. The kinematics of the Milky Way bulge

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

The chemical evolution of the Galactic Bulge seen through micro-lensing events

Overview of Gaia-ESO Survey results based on high-resolution spectra of FGK-type stars Rodolfo Smiljanic! (Gaia-ESO WG11 co-coordinator)

Review of the Bulge Stellar Population And Comparison to the Nuclear Bulge

Surface Brightness of Spiral Galaxies

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

Age and abundance structure of the central sub-kpc of the Milky Way

The Great Debate: The Size of the Universe (1920)

Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

Following the evolution of the Galactic disc with Open Clusters

Gaia ITNG2013 School, Tenerife. Ken Freeman, Lecture 2: the thin disk

Local Group cosmology with ngcfht

The power of chemical tagging for studying Galactic evolution

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

The Composition of the Old, Metal-Rich Open Cluster, NGC 6791

Our Galaxy. Milky Way Galaxy = Sun + ~100 billion other stars + gas and dust. Held together by gravity! The Milky Way with the Naked Eye

Probing GCs in the GC region with GLAO

Overview of Dynamical Modeling. Glenn van de Ven

Exploring the structure and evolu4on of the Milky Way disk

Mapping the oxygen abundance in an elliptical galaxy (NGC 5128)

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Matthias Steinmetz. 16 Oct 2012 Science from the Next Generation Imaging and Spectroscopic Surveys 1

Using Globular Clusters to. Study Elliptical Galaxies. The View Isn t Bad... Omega Centauri. Terry Bridges Australian Gemini Office M13

Micro-lensed dwarf stars in the Galactic Bulge

Substructure in the Galaxy

The Chemical/Dynamical Evolution of the Galactic Bulge

Modelling the Milky Way bar

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Ricardo Schiavon

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Chapter 25: Galaxy Clusters and the Structure of the Universe

Studying the Milky Way with pulsating stars

The M31 Globular Cluster System

Major Review: A very dense article" Dawes Review 4: Spiral Structures in Disc Galaxies; C. Dobbs and J Baba arxiv "

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Galactic dynamics reveals Galactic history

Dust [12.1] Star clusters. Absorb and scatter light Effect strongest in blue, less in red, zero in radio.

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

Outline. c.f. Zhao et al. 2006, ChJA&A, 6, 265. Stellar Abundance and Galactic Chemical Evolution through LAMOST Spectroscopic Survey

3D Spectroscopy to Dissect Galaxies Down to Their Central Supermassive Black Holes. Kambiz Fathi. Stockholm University, Sweden

Milky Way S&G Ch 2. Milky Way in near 1 IR H-W Rixhttp://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/galarcheo-c15/rix/

Astr 5465 Feb. 5, 2018 Kinematics of Nearby Stars

Three Major Components

Basics of Galactic chemical evolution

Stellar Populations in the Local Group

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 7 Dec 2012

Milky Way s Mass and Stellar Halo Velocity Dispersion Profiles

The Thick Thin Disk and the Thin Thick Disk: a New Paradigm from Gaia

Veilleux! see MBW ! 23! 24!

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Dec 1998

THE QUEST RR LYRAE SURVEY AND HALO SUB-STRUCTURE

Signatures of Peculiar Supernova Nucleosynthesis in Extremely α-enhanced Metal-poor Stars

Search for streams in thick disk and halo of the Milky Way

A new mechanism for the formation of PRGs

PATRICIA B. TISSERA. Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics Argentina

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

Myung Gyoon Lee. With Ho Seong Hwang (CfA) and Hong Soo Park (NAOJ) (Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University)

The Universe of Galaxies: from large to small. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 1 introduction

New insights into the Sagittarius stream

The Structure and Substructure of the Milky Way Galaxy Discs. Rosemary Wyse

IV. Interacting Galaxies

Princeton December 2009 The fine-scale structure of dark matter halos

Constraints on secular evolution in unbarred spiral galaxies: understanding bulge and disk formation

Review of stellar evolution and color-magnitude diagrams

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

CN Variations in Globular Clusters

University of Naples Federico II, Academic Year Istituzioni di Astrofisica, read by prof. Massimo Capaccioli. Lecture 16

Stellar Systems with HST

Element abundance ratios and star formation quenching: satellite versus central galaxies

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

Barred Galaxies. Morphology Gas in barred galaxies Dynamics: pattern speed Theory: secular evolution, resonances

Nucleosynthesis in heliumenriched

Spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 25 Mar 2015

Using the HR Diagram to Measure the Star Formation Histories of Galaxies. Tammy Smecker-Hane University of California, Irvine

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ga] 18 Sep 2016

Chemical evolution of the Galactic disk using Open Clusters

The Role Of Globular Clusters During Reionization

Substructure in the Stellar Halo of the Andromeda Spiral Galaxy

Deciphering the origin of globular clusters near the Galactic bulge + more. Masashi Chiba (Tohoku University)

Yicheng Guo (UCO/Lick, UCSC)

SMASHing the LMC. Yumi Choi. Montana State University/University of Arizona. Collaborator

Galactic Projects at ESO Disk and halo. Birgitta Nordström Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Denmark

Carbon Enhanced Metal Poor (CEMP) Stars and the Halo System of the Milky Way

Stellar populations in the cd galaxy NGC 3311

Studying stars in M31 GCs using NIRI and GNIRS

LAMOST Sky Survey --Site limitations and survey planning

THE GALACTIC BULGE AS SEEN BY GAIA

Myung Gyoon Lee ( 李明均 )

Evidence for bar-induced secular evolution in massive disk galaxies. Dimitri Gadotti ESO

Building the cosmic distance scale: from Hipparcos to Gaia

Two Main Techniques. I: Star-forming Galaxies

Transcription:

Galactic Bulge Science Ken Freeman Australian National University ngcfht meeting Hilo, Mar 27-29 2013 NGC 5746 1

The Galactic bulge was long thought to be a merger product. We now know that boxy bulges like the bulge of the Milky Way are not primarily merger products : they come from bar forming and bar buckling instabilities of the disk itself (Athanassoula 2005, Ness et al 2012). The formation of the bulge is closely related to the inner disk. To test the theory of the formation of boxy bulges, we need chemical and kinematical observations of large samples of stars throughout the bulge and inner disk. High resolution observations are needed in order to measure a range of elements produced by nuclear processes that have distinct timescales and locations (SNII, SNIa, AGB stars), in order to understand the star formation history and chemical evolution that occurred before and during the formation of the bulge. 2

The data available already from medium resolution surveys show that the boxy bulge has the characteristic cylindrical rotation pattern predicted by the disk instability picture (e.g. Howard et al 2009, Ness et al 2012). It has so far been difficult to determine whether there is also a minor mergergenerated classical bulge component. This is important, because it would affect our understanding of the early evolution of the inner Galaxy. Stellar kinematics cannot answer this question because a small classical bulge is rapidly spun up by the torque of the bar/bulge, and its kinematics become indistinguishable from those of the main bar/bulge itself (Saha et al 2012). Again, we depend on detailed chemical studies of many elements in many stars to identify the presence of a separate classical bulge component. 3

Simulations show that the first stars to form in our Galaxy are likely to be concentrated to the bulge region (e.g. Tumlinson 2010). They are in the bulge but are not of the bulge. They formed in small overdensities in the early universe at z > 10, before the Galaxy itself had formed, and were subsequently accreted by the Galaxy. Recent medium resolution surveys of the bulge, like the ARGOS/AAT survey (Freeman et al 2012), have identified a population of metal poor stars in the bulge region with metallicities as low as [Fe/H] = 3. These are candidates for the first stars. Detailed high resolution studies of these stars will show whether they are chemically different from the stars of the inner halo which are also expected to be found in this region. -enhancement of the 27 most metal-poor ARGOS stars : all have [Fe/H] < -2.0. The innermost stars are the most -enhanced. Stars that formed at z = 10 are likely to be highly -enhanced. 4

Current state of chemical studies of the Galactic bulge ARGOS (R = 11,000) measured [Fe/H] and [ /Fe] for 28,000 stars in the bulge and adjacent disk. In every field, the MDF shows 3 main components plus two metal-poor components. The fractions change with galactic latitude. 5

The MDF generalised histograms show 5 components for R G < 3.5 kpc 4200 2000 4000 [Fe/H] A 0.12 ± 0.02 B -0.27 ± 0.02 C -0.70 ± 0.01 D -1.18 ± 0.01 E -1.68 ± 0.05 A is strong, C is weak at b = -5º A is weak, C is strong at b = -10º The boxy/peanut structure is defined by A and B only 6

Same MDFs as conventional histograms with same gaussian components. R G < 3.5 kpc. See change of relative weights with latitude Bayesian Information Criterion gives optimal number of components between 4 and 5 These same components are seen all over the bulge and surrounding disk 7

Interpretation of components l = -31º, b = -5º The disk took ~ 2 Gyr to evolve chemically and dynamically before going bar-unstable and buckling into the peanut structure, so the components A-C are trapped relics of the Galactic disk from ~ 8 Gyr ago. The instability process generated a mapping of the stars of the early disk into the boxy/peanut structure. In this way, the bulge preserves a dynamical imprint of the chemical distribution of the disk at the time that the buckling occurred. The bulge is a chemical snapshot of the MDF of the early disk captured in the bar. The mapping of disk into bulge depends on the location and motions of the stars at the time of the instability. Kinematically colder stars can suffer strong radial and vertical migration, and can therefore be strongly involved in the peanut structure (components A and B). 8

like A like B The age-metallicity relation near the sun 10 Gyr ago, the stars of the disk already had a spread in [Fe/H] from about 0 to -0.5, like component B. The younger disk stars have [Fe/H] values from about +0.4 to -0.1, like component A. 9 Wylie de Boer & Freeman 2013

A has an MDF like the younger stars of the thin disk near the sun. It is strongly involved in the peanut structure (like B) but is more concentrated to the Galactic plane. Its strong response to the peanut structure could be because it was a bit colder than B (also younger and more metal-rich) B is the backbone of the peanut structure, with similar fractions at b = -5º and -10º. In the instability scenario, it would represent the bulk of the early disk at the time of the bar-forming instability when most of the disk had abundances between about 0 and -0.5 C has an MDF like the thick disk near the sun and we identify it with the early inner thick disk. It was probably present in the inner Galaxy before the instability. It is not involved in the peanut structure because the thick disk is hotter and less responsive. l = -31º, b = -5º X D and E are likely to be stars of the inner halo 10

The next step is to make a large high resolution survey of bulge stars. High resolution spectroscopy of bulge giants gives abundances of elements from a wide range of element groups (light elements, alpha elements, Fe-peak and n- capture elements). This will provide more insight into the formation and chemical evolution of the bulge than is available from the limited current data for large medium-resolution surveys which give only [Fe/H] and [α/fe]. At the distance of the bulge, medium to high resolution spectroscopy of large samples of bulge stars is possible only for stars on the giant branch (except for the relatively rare bulge dwarfs that are being microlensed at any time). The primary targets for largescale high resolution spectroscopy of bulge stars are therefore likely to be the very abundant clump giants. b = -5º 11

Essential to estimate distances to reduce contamination of bulge sample by foreground and background stars. Clump giants are ideal - accurate high resolution stellar parameters are needed to identify them. Distance errors of 0.7 kpc can be achieved. From the ARGOS survey, 28,000 stars was insufficient to map the [Fe/H] and [ /Fe] distribution: about 200,000 stars are needed. Selection criteria should not exclude metal-poor giants. K A large high resolution survey of bulge giants is out of reach for existing telescopes. It needs a 10-m widefield dedicated facility J-K 12

Bulge science with the ngcfht A high resolution survey of about 200,000 bulge giants Assume 1-degree field, 800 high resolution fibers, 3600 sec gives SN = 120 at g = 18, R = 20,000 Will argue in next talk that there are real gains in having higher resolution: R ~ 45,000 - limiting magnitude need be only 0.5 mag fainter, so 3600 sec would give SN = 95 at g = 18, R = 45,000 Several MOS systems will soon be capable of R = 20,000 spectroscopy. ngcfht will be largest telescope. g ~ 18 is out of reach for the 4-m telescopes. The ngcfht niche is a large high resolution survey of the bulge accessible from Mauna Kea (the l > 0 part). Density of stars is high : plenty of stars within 1º field to fill 800 fibers. 13

Observational goal is to measure abundances of wide range of elements for stars in bulge and surrounding disk. The scientific goal is to understand the chemical evolution of the inner Galaxy in the context of the bulge formation event and its subsequent evolution. From the medium-resolution ARGOS survey, it was clear that 28,000 stars is not enough to properly characterize the metallicity distribution function (MDF) variations over the bulge. To adequately investigate the detailed complexities of the MDF in the inner Galaxy, a sample of about 200, 000 stars is needed, covering the accessible regions of the bulge and inner disk. The relatively large field of the ngcfht and the large number of fibers make it possible to consider a survey on this scale. It would be a great step forward in assessing the chemical state of the inner Galaxy. 14

The high resolution spectra would allow measurement of accurate radial velocities which could be useful for detecting very cold kinematic substructures in the inner galaxies if such substructures are present. They would be likely relics of gas infall and star formation in the inner Galaxy, or debris of small dense galaxies accreted by the Milky Way. A high resolution survey on this scale may also allow the chemical tagging of dispersed substructures which are no longer visible kinematically. 15

16