Use of Taylor Series Expansions for Time Savings in Computation of Accurate Transducer Pressure Fields

Similar documents
MODEL SELECTION IN ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS ON TRABECULAR BONE

Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media

Microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography using multi-sector scanning

Frequency Quantized Nondiffracting X Waves in a Confined Space. Jian-yu Lu, Ph.D.

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF THE SPECTRAL FIT ALGORITHM USING TISSUE MIMICKING PHANTOMS

Modelling I. The Need for New Formulas Calculating Near Field, Lateral Resolution and Depth of Field D. Braconnier, E. Carcreff, KJTD, Japan

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Change in Ultrasonic Backscattered Energy for Temperature Imaging: Factors Affecting Temperature Accuracy and Spatial Resolution in 3D

Fresnel Number Concept and Revision of some Characteristics in the Linear Theory of Focused Acoustic Beams

Feasibility of non-linear simulation for Field II using an angular spectrum approach

Theoretical study of two-element array of equilateral triangular patch microstrip antenna on ferrite substrate

Scattering of light from quasi-homogeneous sources by quasi-homogeneous media

Ultrasound is a widely used, nonionizing, and costeffective

Technical University of Denmark

Pixel-based Beamforming for Ultrasound Imaging

Study and design of a composite acoustic sensor to characterize an heterogeneous media presenting a complex matrix

Spectral Degree of Coherence of a Random Three- Dimensional Electromagnetic Field

PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS ON TRABECULAR BONE

31545 Medical Imaging systems

Doppler echocardiography & Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Doppler echocardiography. History: - Langevin developed sonar.

Ultrasonic Measurement of Minute Displacement of Object Cyclically Actuated by Acoustic Radiation Force

Structure of Biological Materials

Interlaboratory Comparison of Backscatter Coefficient Estimates for Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms

Fast simulation of nonlinear radio frequency ultrasound images in inhomogeneous nonlinear media: CREANUIS

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO ACOUSTIC SATURATION

Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: Calibration measurements and phantom experiments

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION, MATERIAL NOISE AND. Mehmet Bilgen and James H. Center for NDE Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011

N db compared with that in the single pulse harmonic imaging mode, whereas

THEORY-ACOUSTIC PRESSURE FIELD AND BEAM DIRECTIVITY

Today s menu. Last lecture. Ultrasonic measurement systems. What is Ultrasound (cont d...)? What is ultrasound?

Handbook of Radiation and Scattering of Waves:

IN electromagnetic analysis, field quantities are usually assumed

The Physics of Doppler Ultrasound. HET408 Medical Imaging

Correlation analysis of three-dimensional strain imaging using ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers

! #! % && ( ) ) +++,. # /0 % 1 /21/ 3 && & 44&, &&7 4/ 00

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ULTRASOUND ECHO FOR SKIN LESIONS CLASSIFICATION HANNA PIOTRZKOWSKA, JERZY LITNIEWSKI, ELŻBIETA SZYMAŃSKA *, ANDRZEJ NOWICKI

Let us consider a typical Michelson interferometer, where a broadband source is used for illumination (Fig. 1a).

Thaddeus V. Samulski Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Technical University of Denmark

Mathematical Constraint on Functions with Continuous Second Partial Derivatives

Phononic Crystals. J.H. Page

CAPABILITY OF SEGMENTED ANNULAR ARRAYS TO GENERATE 3-D ULTRASONIC IMAGING

Transducer design simulation using finite element method

Workshop 2: Acoustic Output Measurements

Flaw Scattering Models

free space (vacuum) permittivity [ F/m]

Signal Loss. A1 A L[Neper] = ln or L[dB] = 20log 1. Proportional loss of signal amplitude with increasing propagation distance: = α d

A Comparative Evaluation of Four Acoustic Hydrophones in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Field Measurements

Math Methods for Polymer Physics Lecture 1: Series Representations of Functions

Solution of Kirchhoff's Time-Domain Integral Equation in Acoustics

Angular Spectrum Decomposition Analysis of Second Harmonic Ultrasound Propagation and its Relation to Tissue Harmonic Imaging

FIBER Bragg gratings are important elements in optical

Bayesian approach to image reconstruction in photoacoustic tomography

(INCLUDING THIS FRONT PAGE)

Spatio-Temporal Characterization of Bio-acoustic Scatterers in Complex Media

Detection and characterization of optical inhomogeneities with diffuse photon density waves: a signal-to-noise analysis

Lateral Blood Flow Velocity Estimation Based on Ultrasound Speckle Size Change With Scan Velocity

AS to BS in Medical Dosimetry. Core Curriculum Course Descriptions

Semi-analytical computation of acoustic scattering by spheroids and disks

A Nonlinear Dynamic S/H-ADC Device Model Based on a Modified Volterra Series: Identification Procedure and Commercial CAD Tool Implementation

Finite Element Modeling of Ultrasonic Transducers for Polymer Characterization

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Ultrason Imaging. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 November 21.

ULTRASONIC SIGNALS FROM "WORST-CASE" HARD-ALPHA INCLUSIONS

PHASE VELOCITY AND ATTENUATION OF SH WAVES IN A FIBER-

Sound radiation from a loudspeaker, from a spherical pole cap, and from a piston in an infinite baffle1

Destruction of a Magnetic Mirror-Trapped Hot Electron Ring by a shear Alfven Wave

A method of the forward problem for magneto-acousto-electrical tomography

On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers

APPLICATION-DIRECTED MODELING OF RADIATION AND PROPAGATION OF ELASTIC WAVES IN ANISOTROPIC MEDIA: GPSS AND OPOSSM

Application of Autoregressive Spectral Analysis to Cepstral Estimation of Mean Scatterer Spacing

FOR beamforming and emitter localization applications in

I. INTRODUCTION J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (6), June /2004/115(6)/3226/9/$ Acoustical Society of America

Nonlinear derating of high-intensity focused ultrasound beams using Gaussian modal sums

PHYSICS. Chapter 16 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT Pearson Education, Inc.

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Medical Imaging Signals and Systems Jerry L. Prince and Jonathan M. Links Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006

Nondiffracting Waves in 2D and 3D

Vector diffraction theory of refraction of light by a spherical surface

Electromagnetic Implosion Using an Array

RAPID CALCULATION OF LAMB WAVES IN PLATES DUE TO. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Physical principles of Harmonic Imaging Min Joo Choi, PhD

MEASUREMENTS OF ULTRASONIC SCATTERING FROM NEAR-SURFACE FLAWS. D. K. Hsu*, T. A. Gray and R. B. Thompson

/96$ IEEE

Vector blood velocity estimation in medical ultrasound

Continuous waves generated by focused radiators

Simulation of Contrast Agent Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging based on Field II

Foundation of Radiological Physics. Preface

Simplified expansions for radiation from a baffled circular piston

Chapter 1 Introduction

A ROBUST BEAMFORMER BASED ON WEIGHTED SPARSE CONSTRAINT

Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material

Paper V. Acoustic Radiation Losses in Busbars. J. Meltaus, S. S. Hong, and V. P. Plessky J. Meltaus, S. S. Hong, V. P. Plessky.

arxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 21 Jan 2018

6. LIGHT SCATTERING 6.1 The first Born approximation

Spectral Correlation in Ultrasonic Pulse Echo Signal Processing

ESTIMATION OF LAYER THICKNESS BY THE COST FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION: PHANTOM STUDY

Investigation of Transverse Oscillation Method

Output intensity measurement on a diagnostic ultrasound machine using a calibrated thermoacoustic sensor

ULTRASONIC ATTENUATION RESULTS OF THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITES UNDERGOING THERMAL AND FATIGUE LOADING

Transcription:

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL. VOL. UFFC-34, NO. 3, MAY 1987 31 Use of Taylor Series Expansions for Time Savings in Computation of Accurate Transducer Pressure Fields ERNEST L. MADSEN, TIMOTHY J. HALL, JAMES A. ZAGZEBSKI, AND MICHAEL F. INSANA, MEMBER, IEEE Abstract-In the method of data reduction used in our laboratory to determine acoustic backscatter coefficients in tissues and tissuelike media, computation of the complex acoustic pressure in an attenuating medium due to a nonfocused disk radiator is required at a large number of field points and over a frequency band of about 1 MHz. Computer CPU time and input/output time can he considerable because of the need to evaluate an integral corresponding to each field point P and frequency,. The fact that the frequency dependence of this integral is restricted to a factor in the integrand of the form exp (ikr ), where r is the dummy variable and k = k (w) is the complex wave number, makes the integral part of the expansion in a Taylor series straightforward. The first five terms of the Taylor series have been derived, and tests of the accuracy of the expansion are presented. hile maintaining adequate accuracy, the CPU time savings accrued through use of the series corresponds to a factor of 1 /7 and an inputioutput time savings factor of at least 1/6. (The factor 1/7 means, e.g., that a CPU time of 35 min without using the Taylor series becomes 5 min using the Taylor series.) I. INTRODUCTION ONSIDERABLE ORK in our laboratory requires C computation of the pressure field of a focused transducer or disk transducer for pulsed emissions. hen the (linear) Helmholtz equation applies, such pressure fields can be expressed in the form of linear superpositions of sinusoidally varying continuous wave beam spanning some range of frequencies [l]. The continuous wavebeams can be computed by assuming the source to be composed of a uniformly distributed set of equivalent monopole sources oscillating sinusoidally in time and all having the same phase; the uniform distribution means that the number of monopole sources per unit area over the active element of the transducer surface is constant. and this is true no matter how small an area element is considered. Determination of the sinusoidally varying pressure at any point 3 in the field of the transducer for some frequency requires computing the integral Manuscript received April 4, 1986; revised August 4, 1986. This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health under Grants R1 CA5634 and R1 CA394. E. L. Madsen, T. 1. Hall, and J. A. Zagzebski are with the Department of Medical Physics, 153 Medical Science Center. Universily of isconsin, Madison, 1 5376, USA. M. F. Insana is with the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 857, USA. IEEE Log Number 861684. where ds is the area element at position 3 on the transducer surface and S is the total radiating surface of the transducer. The double integral form for A,( 3, ) can be reduced to nonintegral form only on the axis of symmetry of the transducer []. Off axis, the double integral can be reduced to the sum of a single integral and a nonintegral term, and this sum containing the single integral has been shown to be accurate by direct comparison with experiment for the case of a spherical shell-type focused transducer [ l]. A,( 3, ) takes the form where A is the radius of curvature of the radiating surface and S is the distance from the center of curvature of the radiating element to the field point at 3. Also, k is the wavenumber, and C/ k and D /k depend on the geometry of the radiating element only and not on k or. That the single integral version of A,( 7, ) has the above form can be seen by referring to [l, pp. 159, 151 l]. The quantities F, C, D, and p( U) are also given in that reference. Equation () applies for focused radiators and can be extended to nonfocused radiators by taking the limit A + 3. (Note that A + means that A /S + 1 for field points at finite distances from the radiator.) The result of the latter limiting operation is D AON(jt, ) = Is, l p(.) e du - if (3) where C, D, @(U), and F have the limiting forms (A -+ 3 ): and 885-31/87/5-31$1.OO 1987 IEEE I /? c = k[(a - x) + $1 D = k[(u + x) + P y ] -U,B(.) = cos- [ + (u/k)? + x x[ (u/k)*- The quantities? and x are (positive) distances as shown in Fig. 1. y is the distance from the field point (at which 1 Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

3 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, VOL. UFFC-34, NO. 3, MAY 1987 X \ -f- radiating disc Fig. 1. Diagram of planar circular disk transducer modeled. Radius of disk is a, origin of coordinate system is taken to be at center of radiating disk, and y axis is perpendicular to disk. Position vector 7 extends from origin to field point P(x, y). Position vector 7 ' extends from origin to arbitrary point on radiating surface. the pressure is to be found) to the plane containing the radiating disk, and x is the distance from the field point to the axis of symmetry of the transducer. As can be seen in Fig. 1, r = I 71 = (x + y)'1 is the distance from the center of the disk radiator to the field point. These expressions are equivalent to those derived by Lockwood and illette 131 for a nonfocused disk radiator. hen evaluation of some function of A,( 7, ) over ranges of and/or i is required, considerable computer time can be involved because, for each combination of + r and, a single numerical integration must be done. For example, in our laboratory a data reduction method is in use for accurate determination of acoustic backscatter coefficients [4],[S]. This method typically requires computation of A,( 7, ) at about 31 frequencies for each field point 3 within the volume of interest. Equations (13), (15), and (17) of [4] particularize the involvement of Ao( 3, ) over a band of frequencies. Much more demanding of computer time is the computer generation of B-scan texture patterns [6], [7]; because of the broad-band nature of clinical type pulsers, A,( 7, ) typically must be evaluated at about 1 frequencies for each field point 3. (See [7, eq. (S)] for the involvement of A,( 7, ) over a range of frequencies.) One way to reduce considerably the computer time needed, while still maintaining accuracy, is to introduce Taylor series expansions. In this paper the Taylor series expansion in frequency is developed for the case of the nonfocused transducer. Accurate expansion coefficients through four terms are developed as well as a good approximation of the fifth coefficient. Tests of the accuracy of the expansions by comparison with correct results, obtained using numerical integration via Gaussian quadrature, are also presented. 11. DEVELOPMENT OF THE TAYLOR SERIES EXPANSION IN FREQUENCY It is desired to approximate AON( 7, ) in the neighborhood of some frequency wo, using a Taylor series expansion in. Rewriting (3) with a change of variables of integration given by r ' = u / k, we have.c" if AON( 7, ) = c, y(r') eikr' dr' -- (6) k where k = k( ) contains all of the dependence of AoN( 7, ) on. Note that, if the beam exists in an attenuating medium, then k(w) = /C(O) + icy(w), where cy ( ) is the frequency-dependent attenuation coefficient and c ( ) is the-perhaps frequency-dependent-ultrasonic speed in the medium. The limits on the integral and y (r') are independent of : D' = D/k = [(a + x) + ~ ~ 1 ' ' ~ I l C' = D/k = [(a- x)' + y] F is a function of w through k, however. To reduce the very large phases involved on the right side of (6) (viz., kr' of the integrand), it is desirable to expand the quantity e-'kraom( F, ) instead of A,,,( F, U). Minimizing these phases can avoid related numerical computation errors. e have where kl r' - rl << kr', and, in F, << kr for r sufficiently large. The needed derivatives of e-'k'ao,v( 7, ) with respect to are conveniently done by using the chain rule, viz., applying and k I y - r 1 dk _- d d - dw dw dk to AoN( 7, ) as many times as required. Expanding about = wo, the first term in the series is, of course, - e 7, w) where ko = oo/c(wo) + icy(w). The second term has the form and the third term, etc. The chain rule introduces various orders of derivatives of k with respect to. To reduce the complexity of the resulting Taylor series expansion with little (if any) loss in accuracy, we assumed that c ( ) is a constant and used the fact that experimental measurements of cy ( ) can be very well approximated by a quadratic curve fit of the form a(w) = cyo + cyiw + aw [8].' Thus 'If the frequency dependence of the ultrasonic speed c ( ) is considered important, then the real part of!he complex wave numbcr. w/c(w), can be written as a quadratic function of o where the coefficients are determined experimentally or by application of the Kramers-Kronig relations. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

MADSEN et al.: COMPUTATION OF ACCURATE TRANSDUCER PRESSURE FlELDS 33 d"k( -- w) -, for n 3. dw" For notational convenience we define the Taylor series coefficients to be a. = e-"@'an( 7, wo), The other series coefficients are a. = e-ibraon( 7, O) + (b/k)[(k6-1 ) ehk + (1 - k d) em]],=o 1 d" a, E -- n! dw" [e-'qod 4 1 7 7 Then the Taylor series in takes the simple form e-ikraon( 7, ) = a. + + +.I( - O) a(w - O) + - a,(w - O)" + * *. e have determined the exact forms for ao, al, a, and a3. Coefficient a4 has been approximated by including the contribution from the integral term in (6) and neglecting the nonintegral term if/ k. This means that u4 is accurate for x a since F = in that region, but the accuracy is compromised forx < U. In the tests below, it will be seen that dropping the dependence of a4 on F for x < a is justified in most cases. This particular approximation is desirable since the nth derivative of the integral term very easily determined. This is because l is D' = S y(r') [i<,-' - r)]ne;'(r'-r) dr ' C' and, with the quadratic approximation for k ( ) = / c + ia(w), we have d4 dk d4 dk L =3- -+6- -- dk d3 - dw4 [dw']l dk [do] dw dk3 + ["l*" dw dk4' ic, D' a4 = [z I y(r') eik(r'-r) dr' [S] + 6[$7 [i(r'- Y )] 3 4 + [g] '1 [i(rl- r)] = O =wo eiko( r' - r ) dr I where 6 = i { [(a - x) + - r }, d = i( y - r), and b=[ -7ri, if x I a, if x>a 111. ACCURACY TESTS Nonfocused transducers having a diameter of 1.7 mm have been used in our data acquisition for determination of backscatter coefficients of tissues and tissuelike materials. Tests of the accuracy of the (truncated) Taylor series are reported here for typical experimental conditions involved in these measurements. The transducer modeled has a diameter of 1.7 mm, and the reference frequency is wo = 3. MHz = 67r X lo6 rad/s. The results are shown in Figs. -8. The solid lines correspond to correct computations in which the integration in (8) is performed numerically via Gaussian quadrature. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

34 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS. AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, VOL. UFFC-34. NO. 3, MAY 1987 l.o TERM --- 3 TERM... J.6 V > m a.4 S a.5 1. 1.5..5 1. 1.5. Fig.. Graphs showing increase in accuracy of Taylor series as number of terms kept increases from (dashed lines) to 3 (dotted lines). Modulus. Phase. Frequency at which computations were made is.5 MHz, and reference frequency is 3. MHz. Axial distance Y is fixed at 11.O cm, distal 4. cm of which contains attenuating tissue-mimicking material. Correct curves, obtained by direct numerical integration, are solid lines. 6. =.5 MHz O = 3. MHz 5-TERM --- 4- X I.O'.a-. j;. J.6- w - m 4 r a.4- =.5 MHz ul =3. MHz 5-TERM --- I 7 -.-.5 1. 1.5. :5 I:O 1.5. DISTANCE OFF AXIS (cm) Fig. 3. Graphs showing five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) for modulus and phase of AoN( F, ) compared with correct results (solid lines). All other conditions correspond to those of Fig.. Dashed and dotted curves correspond to calculations using having an ultrasonic speed of 158 m/s and an attenuation Taylor series. In each figure part shows the modulus coefficient of a(w) =.45 db - cm-' +.97 db of AON( 7, ) and part shows its phase. Also, in all cm-' MHz-' +.391 db * cm-' MHz-' '.' The figures the abscissa is x, the distance off-axis for a fixed remaining 7. cm of the 1 l.o cm distance y consists of value of y; such plots are commonly referred to as lateral water. Appropriate equivalent values of c and cy were used beam profiles. In -69 Y is 1.O cm, and the 4.-cm section Of Y *The values of c and the cunefitted coefficients in a( ) resulted from furthest from the transducer exists in tissuelike material measurements on an actual test sample of tissue-mimicking material. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. MADSEN et al.: COMPUTATION OF ACCURATE TRANSDUCER PRESSURE FIELDS 35 I.o =3.5 MHz I I 3.5 3..5 - x. \ = 3.5 MHz O = 3. MHz.e Lo 3 g 1.5 n I l.o.5. 5-TERM --- i l'.5 1. 1.5..5 1. 1.5. DISTANCE OFF AXIS (cm) DISTANCE OFF AXIS C (cm) Fig. 4. Five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) compared with correct results (solid lines) for frequency of 3.5 MHz. All other conditions correspond to those of Fig.. =. MHz 5-TERM -- - I.o.8 n v) 5.6 V t V v v).4 I a.e 4 n v.5 1. 1.5..5 1. 1.5. DISTANCE OFF AXIS (Cm) Fig. 5. Five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) compared with correct results (solid lines) for frequency of. MHz. All other conditions correspond to those of Fig.. L to compute the complex wavenumber k( ) used in all computations. Figs. and 3 illustrate the improvement in the approximation as the number of terms kept in the Taylor series increases from two to three to five. The frequency represented is.5 MHz. Inclusion of all five terms yields excellent accuracy for both amplitude and phase even through the second side lobe. All remaining figures correspond to the inclusion of all five terms of the Taylor series. Fig. 4 corresponds to a frequency of 3.5 MHz. Again, inclusion of all five terms yields excellent agreement between the Taylor series result and the correct calculation. hen the difference between the frequency of interest and the 3.-MHz reference frequency reaches 1 MHz, the degree of accuracy degenerates considerably beyond an off-axis distance of about 7 mm or approximately the radius of the disk source. This is illustrated in Figs. 5 and 6. The curves in Fig. 7 compare again the five-term series result for the same situation as that in Fig. 4 except that the entire volume between the transducer and field points

I.o.e O = 3. MHz. A U).6 U >..4 X L.? 5-TERM --- Fig. 6. Five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) compared with COTrect results (solid lines) for frequency of 4. MHz. All other conditions correspond to those of Fig...5 1. 1.5. = 3.5 MHz,, = 3. MHz e U) = 3.5 MHz wo = 3. MHz 1 \ DISTANCE OFF AXIS (Cm) Fig. 7. Five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) compared with correct results (solid lines) for frequency of 3.5 MHz. All other conditions correspond to those of Fig. except that -entire 11 cm region between radiating disk and field points contains attenuating tissue-mimicking material. contains material with tissuelike attenuation. Again good agreement is demonstrated through the second side lobe. Finally, to test the five-term series accuracy at a value of y other than 11. cm, the results for a frequency of 3.5 MHz and y = 6. cm are shown in Fig. 8. The entire volume between the transducer and field points contains material with tissuelike attenuation. IV. COMPUTER TIME SAVINGS The frequency range required for computation of backscatter coefficients using our method of data reduction [4] for a typical experimental situation using narrow-band pulses is generally no more than 1 MHz, i.e., wo +_.5 MHz, where the reference frequency wo is the frequency at which the backscatter coefficient is determined. Also, we have found that beam pressures beyond the second side lobe do not contribute significantly. Thus the five-term truncated Taylor series is adequate for use in our determinations of backscatter coefficients. In the application of our data reduction technique for determining backscatter coefficients, typically AON( 7, ) is evaluated at 3 field points 3 and, for each field point, at least 31 frequencies. The time required for these computations via numerical integration using Gaussian Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

MADSEN er al.: COMPUTATION OF ACCURATE TRANSDUCER PRESSURE FIELDS 37. 1 5 4 wa 1 = 3.5 MHz 9 = 3. MHz 8 l.7 UJ = 3.5 MHz O = 3. MHz x 1. v) 3 J 3 D z.5 \.4 a r a.3 I L.5 1 1 5 5 1. 1.5. Fig. 8. Five-term Taylor series results (dashed lines) compared with correct results (solid lines) for frequency of 3.5 MHz when axial distance from transducer is 6. cm instead of 11. cm, and entire region between radiating disk and field points contains attenuating tissue-mimicking material. quadrature without the Taylor series is 3.4 h using a DEC PDP 11/3 + computer equipped with an array processor. hen the five-term Taylor series is used (including computation of the integrals in the coefficients), the time required is about 3 min. Thus the CPU time is reduced to 1 /7. If more than 31 frequencies per field point are desirable, the time savings is greater. Another advantage of the Taylor series use is that the core memory and input/output time required are greatly reduced when the Taylor series is used. For example, suppose that a recomputation of a backscatter coefficient is needed to assess the effect of uncertainty in the value of the mass density of the scatterers in a tissue-mimicking material. Thus all complex values of AON ( 7, ) involved should be stored for retrieval. Borrowing relevant values from the above example, 3 field points are involved with 31 complex numbers at each field point corresponding to the 31 frequencies. At 64 bits, or 8 bytes, per single precision complex number, this amounts to 744 kbytes of memory. hen the Taylor series expansion is used, it is only necessary to store five complex numbers (coefficients) for each field point instead of 3 1; thus the memory needed is 1 kbytes instead of 744. The total core memory in our DEC PDP 11/3 + is 5 1 kbytes, and at least 1 kbytes is available for storage. Therefore, by using the Taylor series we can avoid the need for noncore storage, and input/output time savings can be considerable. Even if the same storage mode is used, the input/output time savings factor is 1 /744 z 1 /6. V. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION Employment of the five-term (truncated) Taylor series to compute accurate complex pressure fields for 31 fre- quency values per field point, such as is involved in data reduction to determine backscatter coefficients in our laboratory, results in a reduction of PDP 11/3 + CPU time required to about 1 /7 of that without using the series. Also resulting is a reduction of input/output time by a factor of 1 /6, or better. Estimation of time savings for other applications can be made accordingly. hen the attenuation coefficient is nonzero, causality, via the Kramers-Kronig relations [9], requires that there be some dependence of the ultrasonic speed c on the frequency. In general, the greater the attenuation coefficient and its related dependence on the frequency, the greater the dependence of c on the frequency. In tissues the frequency dependence of the ultrasonic speed is known to be very small, andin the generation of the figures in this work, this dependence has not been introduced. In our treatment, however, almost all of the effect of the frequency dependence of c occurs in the factor Cikr on the left of (8). In recovering A,( 7, ) after expanding and evaluating 7, ), the result was multiplied by eikr in which c = c ( ) = c ( w) = constant. To account for almost all of the effect of the frequency dependence of c, the real part of k in this recovering factor eikr could be made /C( ) where c( ) is the ultrasonic speed as shifted from c ( w) via the Kramers-Kronig relations. The fact that c = c ( coo) is used in evaluating the right side of (8) results in a small error because (r'- r) in the integrand is in general small. It is possible, however, that for extreme situations, such as when - w and CY ( ) are large and r is of the ordet of the diameter of the radiating element, that the effect of neglecting the frequency dependence of c on the right side of (8) would not be negligible. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

38 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, VOL. UFFC-34, NO. 3, MAY 1987 In a paper in preparation, work will be reported in which the Taylor series expansion has been applied to focused radiators, and in that paper the Kramer-Kronig relations have been completely represented, resulting in no approximation for causality. Because of the prevalence of focused radiators in the generation of B-scan images, this Taylor series expansion will be valuable, not only in backscatter coefficient determination, but in computer modeling of B-scan texture patterns [6], [7]. In the case of the texture modeling, we estimate that there will again be a savings in CPU time to generate A,( 7, ) values by a factor of 1 /7. In addition, input/output time savings will correspond to a factor of about 1 / 8. of America Timothy J. Hall was born in Flint. MI, in 1956. In 1983 he received the B.S. degree in physics, summa cum laude, from the University of Michigan, Flint, and was a Maize and Blue Scholar. He received the M.S. degree in medical physics in 1985 from the University of isconsin. Madison, where he is currently working toward a Ph.D., also in medical physics. His research interests are in ultrasound tissue characterization and medical imaging in general. Mr. Hall is a member of the Acoustical Society James A. Zagzebski received the B.S. degree in physics from St. Mary's College, inona, MN, and the M.S. degree in physics and the Ph.D. degree in radiological sciences from the University of isconsin. He is Professor of Medical Physics and of Radiology and Human Oncology at the University of isconsin. His research interests include medical imaging, diagnostic ultrasound, and ultrasound hyperthermia. magnetic resonance rnsana imaging. Dr. Ernest L. Madsen received the B.S. and the M.S. degrees in physics from the University of Maryland, College Park, and the Ph.D. degree in physics from the Catholic University of America, ashington, DC. He is an Associate Professor of Medical Physics at the University of isconsin, Madison. His research encompasses a range of subjects in medical ultrasound, including imaging, hyperthermia, and biological effects. He also pursues development of test obiects for use in medical nuclear Michael F. lnsana ("85) was born in Portsmouth, VA, on December 18, 1954. He received the B.S. degree in physics from Oakland University, Rochester, MI, in 1978, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in medical physics from the University of isconsin, Madison in 198 and 1983, respectively. He is currently a research physicist at the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration in Rockville, MD. His research interests in medical imaging include ultrasonic and magnetic re :so lnance imaging and tissue characterization, and statistical pattern recogr liti ion techniques. associate is member an of the Acoustical Society of America. Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Illinois. Downloaded on November 11, 8 at 16:44 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.