UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Similar documents
ECE-342 Test 3: Nov 30, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : Solution

Final Exam. 55:041 Electronic Circuits. The University of Iowa. Fall 2013.

Advanced Current Mirrors and Opamps

55:041 Electronic Circuits The University of Iowa Fall Exam 2

6.012 Electronic Devices and Circuits Spring 2005

University of Toronto. Final Exam

Homework Assignment 08

Homework Assignment 09

Lecture 37: Frequency response. Context

Biasing the CE Amplifier

3. Basic building blocks. Analog Design for CMOS VLSI Systems Franco Maloberti

Electronic Circuits Summary

Homework Assignment 11

CARLETON UNIVERSITY. FINAL EXAMINATION December DURATION 3 HOURS No. of Students 130

Georgia Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Midterm-1 Exam (Solution)

EECS 141: FALL 05 MIDTERM 1

LECTURE 130 COMPENSATION OF OP AMPS-II (READING: GHLM , AH )

55:041 Electronic Circuits The University of Iowa Fall Final Exam

ECE-343 Test 1: Feb 10, :00-8:00pm, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

ECE-343 Test 2: Mar 21, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1 FINAL EXAMINATION NAME SCORE /120

Microelectronic Circuit Design 4th Edition Errata - Updated 4/4/14

EE 40: Introduction to Microelectronic Circuits Spring 2008: Midterm 2

Homework 6 Solutions and Rubric

I. Frequency Response of Voltage Amplifiers

Electronics II. Final Examination

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Spring 2016 Anant Sahai and Michel Maharbiz Midterm 2

Advanced Analog Integrated Circuits. Operational Transconductance Amplifier II Multi-Stage Designs

ECE137B Final Exam. There are 5 problems on this exam and you have 3 hours There are pages 1-19 in the exam: please make sure all are there.

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley. Final Exam Solutions

DESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C

Designing Information Devices and Systems II Fall 2018 Elad Alon and Miki Lustig Discussion 5A

ECE137B Final Exam. Wednesday 6/8/2016, 7:30-10:30PM.

EECS 16B: FALL 2015 FINAL

The current source. The Active Current Source

Chapter 10 Feedback. PART C: Stability and Compensation

EE214 Early Final Examination: Fall STANFORD UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering. SAMPLE FINAL EXAMINATION Fall Quarter, 2002

EECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley. Final Exam: Friday, August 10, 2012

Analog Integrated Circuit Design Prof. Nagendra Krishnapura Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

CE/CS Amplifier Response at High Frequencies

Frequency Response Prof. Ali M. Niknejad Prof. Rikky Muller

Studio 9 Review Operational Amplifier Stability Compensation Miller Effect Phase Margin Unity Gain Frequency Slew Rate Limiting Reading: Text sec 5.

Sample-and-Holds David Johns and Ken Martin University of Toronto

Transistor amplifiers: Biasing and Small Signal Model

Problem Set 4 Solutions

University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering ESE 319 Microelectronic Circuits. Final Exam 10Dec08 SOLUTIONS

ID # NAME. EE-255 EXAM 3 April 7, Instructor (circle one) Ogborn Lundstrom

Lecture 320 Improved Open-Loop Comparators and Latches (3/28/10) Page 320-1

Lecture 14: Electrical Noise

EECS240 Spring Today s Lecture. Lecture 2: CMOS Technology and Passive Devices. Lingkai Kong EECS. EE240 CMOS Technology

Lecture 04: Single Transistor Ampliers

EECE 2150 Circuits and Signals, Biomedical Applications Final Exam Section 3

Circle the one best answer for each question. Five points per question.

EECE 2150 Circuits and Signals Final Exam Fall 2016 Dec 16

Chapter 13 Small-Signal Modeling and Linear Amplification

Systematic Design of Operational Amplifiers

VI. Transistor amplifiers: Biasing and Small Signal Model

Electronics II. Final Examination

Electronics II. Final Examination

Lecture 10, ATIK. Data converters 3

Common Drain Stage (Source Follower) Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University

OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER APPLICATIONS

CMOS Comparators. Kyungpook National University. Integrated Systems Lab, Kyungpook National University. Comparators

ECEN 326 Electronic Circuits

Chapter 11 AC and DC Equivalent Circuit Modeling of the Discontinuous Conduction Mode

KH600. 1GHz, Differential Input/Output Amplifier. Features. Description. Applications. Typical Application

Electronics II. Midterm #1

Operational amplifiers (Op amps)

Integrated Circuit Operational Amplifiers

Advanced Analog Integrated Circuits. Operational Transconductance Amplifier I & Step Response

KOM2751 Analog Electronics :: Dr. Muharrem Mercimek :: YTU - Control and Automation Dept. 1 4 DC BIASING BJTS (CONT D II )

ECE 3050A, Spring 2004 Page 1. FINAL EXAMINATION - SOLUTIONS (Average score = 78/100) R 2 = R 1 =

University of California at Berkeley College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Midterm Exam (closed book/notes) Tuesday, February 23, 2010

6.301 Solid-State Circuits Recitation 22: More on Transimpedance Amplifiers, and Intro to Zener Diode References Prof. Joel L.

ENGR-4300 Spring 2009 Test 2. Name: SOLUTION. Section: 1(MR 8:00) 2(TF 2:00) 3(MR 6:00) (circle one) Question I (20 points): Question II (20 points):

Operational Amplifier (Op-Amp) Operational Amplifiers. OP-Amp: Components. Internal Design of LM741

Electronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 18 - Single Transistor Amplifier Stages - Outline Announcements. Notes on Single Transistor Amplifiers

The Cooper Union Department of Electrical Engineering ECE111 Signal Processing & Systems Analysis Final May 4, 2012

Chapter 3. FET Amplifiers. Spring th Semester Mechatronics SZABIST, Karachi. Course Support

Lecture 13 MOSFET as an amplifier with an introduction to MOSFET small-signal model and small-signal schematics. Lena Peterson

ELEC 2501 AB. Come to the PASS workshop with your mock exam complete. During the workshop you can work with other students to review your work.

Frequency Dependent Aspects of Op-amps

Figure Circuit for Question 1. Figure Circuit for Question 2

Chapter 4 Field-Effect Transistors

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA. Dottorato di Ricerca in Ingegneria Elettronica, Automatica e del Controllo di Sistemi Complessi, XXII ciclo

Lecture 23 Frequency Response of Amplifiers (I) Common Source Amplifier. December 1, 2005

Advantages of Using CMOS

Stability of Operational amplifiers

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING DIGITAL INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FALL 2002

Design Engineering MEng EXAMINATIONS 2016

Lecture 23: Negative Resistance Osc, Differential Osc, and VCOs

'XNH8QLYHUVLW\ (GPXQG73UDWW-U6FKRRORI(QJLQHHULQJ. EGR 224 Spring Test II. Michael R. Gustafson II

CMOS Cross Section. EECS240 Spring Today s Lecture. Dimensions. CMOS Process. Devices. Lecture 2: CMOS Technology and Passive Devices

MAE140 Linear Circuits Fall 2016 Final, December 6th Instructions

ECE2210 Final given: Fall 13

CMOS Cross Section. EECS240 Spring Dimensions. Today s Lecture. Why Talk About Passives? EE240 Process

EE105 Fall 2015 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Frequency Response. Prof. Ming C. Wu 511 Sutardja Dai Hall (SDH)

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences E. Alon Final EECS 240 Monday, May 19, 2008 SPRING 2008 You should write your results on the exam sheets only. Partial credit will be given only if you show your work and reasoning clearly. Throughout the exam, you can ignore the r o of any transistors and all capacitors except those explicitly drawn in the diagrams unless the problem states otherwise. Name: SID: Problem 1 / 16 Problem 2 / 16 Problem 3 / 20 Problem 4 / 20 Total / 72 1

Problem 1 (16 points) Active Inductors a) (4 pts) As we will explore further in this problem, many of the equalizers discussed in class make use of so-called active inductors. For what values of R eq and L eq will the Z in s of the two circuits shown below exactly equal each other? You should provide your answer in terms of the g m of the transistor and ω z = (R z C z ) -1. You should assume that the unity-gain buffer in the active inductor is ideal (i.e., has infinite input impedance and zero output impedance). b) (2 pts) Given your answer to part a), if g m = 500µS, what value of L eq is required for ω z to equal 2π 200MHz? 2

c) (4 pts) For the equalizing amplifier shown below, what is the variance of the noise at V out due only to the thermal noise of R L? (i.e., you can ignore the noise from the input transistor) You should provide your answer in terms of kt, C L, L eq, and R L. 3

d) (6 pts) What is the noise variance at V out due only to the thermal noise of the load for the active inductor equalizer shown below? You can ignore the noise from R z, but note that there is no longer a buffer isolating R z and C z from the output (i.e., you should include the loading due to R z and C z ). You should provide your answer in terms of kt, γ, ω z, C L, and C z. 4

Problem 2 (16 points) Equalizer Design This problem will examine the link shown below, where the channel behaves as a singlepole low-pass filter, and the receiver uses the R1/R2/C1 network to perform equalization. You can assume that the amplifier in the receiver has zero output impedance. 1 1+ s ωchan a) (4 pts) Assuming R1 is fixed, write the two equations you would use to set R2 and C1 in order to achieve an equalized 3dB bandwidth of ω bit_rate over a channel with a pole at ω chan. Given these relationships, what is the DC gain of the equalizer? (Hint: what are the pole and zero locations of the equalizer?) 5

b) (4 pts) Given your answer to a), if we d like the overall gain (i.e., V out /V rx ) of the equalizer to be equal to A eq over a 3dB bandwidth of ω bit_rate, what is the total gain-bandwidth required of the amplifier? You should provide your answer in terms of A eq, ω chan, and ω bit_rate. 6

c) (4 pts) Now let s assume that due to a design error, both the zero and the DC gain of the equalizer are 3 times lower than their expected values. Ignoring the finite bandwidth of the amplifier, sketch the new equalized response in the frequency domain (i.e., V out (jω)/v tx (jω) ). Be sure to label the magnitudes and frequencies of all relevant break-points. d) (4 pts) For the situation in c), how much smaller is the worst-case eye opening in comparison to the case where R1 takes on the correct value? (Hint: Sketch the step response of V out /V tx ) 7

Problem 3 (20 points) CML Latch In this problem we will be looking at the CML latch shown below. M1, M2, M3, and M4 all have a channel length of 0.2µm and the same width. The widths of these devices are chosen to achieve a fixed V* of 200mV. M5 and M6 are operated as switches that you can assume are ideal. Unless otherwise noted, you should use the following design and technology parameters: R L = 2kΩ I b = 250µA For V* = 200mV, I DS /W = 25µA/µm. V DD = 1.8V A Vth = 8mV µm A β = 4% µm a) (3 pts) What is the gain from V i to V o while M5 is on and M6 is off? 8

b) (4 pts) What is the standard deviation (σ) of the input-referred offset of the latch due only to M1 and M2? Don t forget to include the impact of β mismatch. c) (6 pts) Given your answers to parts a) and b), what is the total σ of the inputreferred offset of the latch? (Note that you can assume that the resistors are perfectly matched, but don t forget to include the impact of M3 and M4.) 9

d) (4 pts) Assuming your answer to part c) was σ offset =10mV, how much power would the latch need to dissipate in order to reduce the σ offset to 2mV? As you resize the latch to reduce the offset, you should maintain the same V*=200mV for all of the devices, as well as the same bandwidth and regeneration time constant (remember that the gate capacitors of M3 and M4 will load the output). 10

e) (3 pts) Now returning to the original latch design with I b = 250µA and still assuming that the answer to part c) was σ offset =10mV, let s consider the power required to cancel the offset of the latch using the programmable current trim circuit shown below. What is the maximum value of I off+ or I off- required to cancel 3σ (i.e., 30mV) of input-referred offset? 11

Problem 4 (20 points) Miscellaneous a) (6 pts) What is the small-signal loop gain T(s) of the common-mode feedback loop shown below? You can assume that the OTA has a finite transconductance of G m, but otherwise is ideal (i.e., it has infinite input and output impedance). 12

b) (6 pts) In order to save power by turning on their biasing circuitry for only 10ns every 100us, one of your colleagues suggests augmenting their current mirrors with a sampling switch as shown below. What will likely be the largest source of error in the output current caused by this approach? What design steps could you take to mitigate this error? (Two correctly explained suggestions will receive full credit on this problem.) 13

c) (8 pts) Shown below is a two-stage Miller compensated amplifier tied in unitygain feedback along with its bias generation circuit. How can you modify the bias circuit to ensure that the closed-loop bandwidth of the amplifier remains constant across process, voltage, and temperature variations? (Hint: What reference source might be available that is measured in the same units as bandwidth?) To receive full credit on this problem, you should describe the relationships that set the closed-loop bandwidth of your modified circuit. 14

15