BOUNDARY LAYER STRUCTURE SPECIFICATION

Similar documents
THE MET INPUT MODULE

Logarithmic velocity profile in the atmospheric (rough wall) boundary layer

On flow separation under stable conditions: results from flow visualization in MATERHORN-X

Boundary Layer Parametrization for Atmospheric Diffusion Models by Meteorological Measurements at Ground Level.

350 Int. J. Environment and Pollution Vol. 5, Nos. 3 6, 1995


Roughness Sub Layers John Finnigan, Roger Shaw, Ned Patton, Ian Harman

Analytical air pollution modeling T. Tirabassi ABSTRACT

Atmospheric stability parameters and sea storm severity

The parametrization of the planetary boundary layer May 1992

The atmospheric boundary layer: Where the atmosphere meets the surface. The atmospheric boundary layer:

EAS rd Scored Assignment (20%) Due: 7 Apr. 2016

The Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The Surface Energy Balance (9.2)

Needs work : define boundary conditions and fluxes before, change slides Useful definitions and conservation equations

INDEX. (The index refers to the continuous pagination)

τ xz = τ measured close to the the surface (often at z=5m) these three scales represent inner unit or near wall normalization

Footprints: outline Üllar Rannik University of Helsinki

Effects of different terrain on velocity standard deviations

1 The Richardson Number 1 1a Flux Richardson Number b Gradient Richardson Number c Bulk Richardson Number The Obukhov Length 3

ADAPTATION OF THE REYNOLDS STRESS TURBULENCE MODEL FOR ATMOSPHERIC SIMULATIONS

A Note on the Estimation of Eddy Diffusivity and Dissipation Length in Low Winds over a Tropical Urban Terrain

A simple operative formula for ground level concentration from a point source

Spring Semester 2011 March 1, 2011

COMMENTS ON "FLUX-GRADIENT RELATIONSHIP, SELF-CORRELATION AND INTERMITTENCY IN THE STABLE BOUNDARY LAYER" Zbigniew Sorbjan

PLUME RISE MODEL SPECIFICATION

The applicability of Monin Obukhov scaling for sloped cooled flows in the context of Boundary Layer parameterization

Wind driven mixing below the oceanic mixed layer

Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology

The refinement of a meteorological preprocessor for the urban environment. Ari Karppinen, Sylvain M. Joffre and Jaakko Kukkonen

Fundamentals of Weather and Climate

Prototype Instabilities

Department of Meteorology University of Nairobi. Laboratory Manual. Micrometeorology and Air pollution SMR 407. Prof. Nzioka John Muthama

PALM - Cloud Physics. Contents. PALM group. last update: Monday 21 st September, 2015

Abstract. 1. Introduction

H A NOVEL WIND PROFILE FORMULATION FOR NEUTRAL CONDITIONS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

A Reexamination of the Emergy Input to a System from the Wind

Sea-surface roughness and drag coefficient as function of neutral wind speed

1.18 EVALUATION OF THE CALINE4 AND CAR-FMI MODELS AGAINST THE DATA FROM A ROADSIDE MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN

Part I: Dry Convection

Part III: Modeling atmospheric convective boundary layer (CBL) Evgeni Fedorovich School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA

October 1991 J. Wang and Y. Mitsuta 587 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. Turbulence Structure and Transfer Characteristics

Mixing and Turbulence

Buoyancy Fluxes in a Stratified Fluid

4.4 Simulating Diurnally Driven Slope Winds with WindNinja

INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES

DIAGNOSTIC WIND FIELD

The Ocean-Atmosphere System II: Oceanic Heat Budget

C E R C. Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants Ltd. Development of boundary layer profiles for offshore dispersion modelling.

Surface layer parameterization in WRF

Atmospheric Boundary Layers

Supporting Information for The origin of water-vapor rings in tropical oceanic cold pools

MARINE BOUNDARY-LAYER HEIGHT ESTIMATED FROM NWP MODEL OUTPUT BULGARIA

EAS 572 Assignment 3 (25%) 2012

Developments in ADMS-Airport and its Applications to Heathrow Airport. IAE (Institute of Aviation and the Environment) Cambridge, June

Analysis of offshore turbulence intensity comparison with prediction models. Karolina Lamkowska Piotr Domagalski Lars Morten Bardal Lars Roar Saetran

17th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes 9-12 May 2016, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract. Introduction

Analytical Model for Dispersion of Rocket Exhaust Source Size Impact Assessment

Cambridge Using Plume Rise Schemes To Model Highly Buoyant Plumes From Large Fires

A wind-tunnel artificially-thickened simulated weakly unstable atmospheric boundary layer

On the Velocity Gradient in Stably Stratified Sheared Flows. Part 2: Observations and Models

Analysis of Near-Surface Oceanic Measurements Obtained During CBLAST-Low

SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER OVER MAKASSAR

1.14 A NEW MODEL VALIDATION DATABASE FOR EVALUATING AERMOD, NRPB R91 AND ADMS USING KRYPTON-85 DATA FROM BNFL SELLAFIELD

Generating and Using Meteorological Data in AERMOD

Theory of linear gravity waves April 1987

Large eddy simulation studies on convective atmospheric boundary layer

Environmental Fluid Dynamics

Numerical and Laboratory Study of Horizontally Evolving Convective Boundary Layer. Part II: Effects of Elevated Wind Shear and Surface Roughness

Sergej S. Zilitinkevich 1,2,3. Division of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland

Improved Atmospheric Stable Boundary Layer Formulations for Navy Seasonal Forecasting

Instituto di Fisica, Universitd 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy

Experiments on the perturbation of a channel flow by a triangular ripple

Characteristics of Langmuir Turbulence in the Ocean Mixed Layer

Lecture 3. Turbulent fluxes and TKE budgets (Garratt, Ch 2)

AERMOD Technical Forum

( ) = 1005 J kg 1 K 1 ;

Measuring the flux of dust from unpaved roads John M. Veranth and Eric Pardyjak University of Utah

APanel Documentation

Lecture 7. Science A-30 February 21, 2008 Air may be forced to move up or down in the atmosphere by mechanical forces (wind blowing over an obstacle,

Probability density functions of turbulent velocity and temperature in the atmospheric surface layer

STREET CANYON MODEL MISKAM AND

Nonsingular Implementation of the Mellor-Yamada. Level 2.5 Scheme in the NCEP Meso model

CHAM Case Study CFD Modelling of Gas Dispersion from a Ruptured Supercritical CO 2 Pipeline

Road to Turbulence in Stratified Flow

Performance of Steady-State Dispersion Models Under Low Wind-Speed Conditions

For example, for values of A x = 0 m /s, f 0 s, and L = 0 km, then E h = 0. and the motion may be influenced by horizontal friction if Corioli

EVALUATION OF NEW GENERATION ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION MODELS

The Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The Surface Energy Balance (9.2)

Fluid Dynamics Exercises and questions for the course

Arctic Boundary Layer

Air Pollution Meteorology

Model description of the RODOS Meteorological Pre-Processor RODOS(RA2)-TN(09)-02

Overview of Meteorology and Atmospheric Dispersion

Problem 4.3. Problem 4.4

THE EFFECT OF STRATIFICATION ON THE ROUGHNESS LENGTH AN DISPLACEMENT HEIGHT

2.1 OBSERVATIONS AND THE PARAMETERISATION OF AIR-SEA FLUXES DURING DIAMET

Measurements and Simulations of Wakes in Onshore Wind Farms Julie K. Lundquist 1,2

BIAS ON THE WIND-SPEED GUST CAUSED BY QUANTIZATION AND DISJUNCT SAMPLING OF THE CUP-ANEMOMETER SIGNAL

Nicolas Duchene 1, James Smith 1 and Ian Fuller 2

Transcription:

August 2017 P09/01X/17 BOUNDARY LAYER STRUCTURE SPECIFICATION CERC In this document ADMS refers to ADMS 5.2, ADMS-Roads 4.1, ADMS-Urban 4.1 and ADMS-Airport 4.1. Where information refers to a subset of the listed models, the model name is given in full. 1. Introduction This paper contains the technical specification for the boundary layer structure for ADMS. The ADMS dispersion calculations require various boundary layer data, as follows: vertical profile of mean wind speed,, vertical profile of turbulence components vertical profile of buoyancy frequency vertical profile of temperature, vertical and transverse turbulent length scales Lagrangian time scale vertical profile of energy dissipation rate vertical profile of pressure vertical profile of specific humidity vertical profile of potential temperature ADMS includes algorithms to calculate these quantities; measurements of some quantities may alternatively be specified by the user (specifically, vertical profiles of wind speed, turbulence components, temperature and specific humidity). Section 2 lists the input quantities required for the boundary layer structure algorithms, which are principally supplied by the Meteorological Input Module. Section 3 describes the algorithms for the output quantities required by the dispersion modules. Section 4 describes how user-entered measurements are used. Page 1 of 11

2. Input for Boundary Layer Structure algorithms The details of how the meteorological data are processed and prepared so that they are representative of the site in question are presented in the Technical Specification of the Met Input Module, P05/01. The variables required for the boundary layer structure module which are calculated by the met processor are: friction velocity convective velocity scale near surface temperature (K) buoyancy frequency above boundary layer temperature step across elevated inversion height of boundary layer Monin-Obukhov length maximum turning of the wind with height surface specific humidity surface latent heat flux relative humidity just above boundary layer relative humidity lapse rate above boundary layer the surface roughness length at the source site, is also required and this is entered directly by the user. P09/01X/17 Page 2 of 11

3. Boundary Layer Algorithms These are discussed in detail in reference [1]. The algorithms are described in Sections 3.1-3.8. 3.1 Mean wind profile The profile for the mean wind is calculated from (1) where is von Karman s constant (0.4), the Monin-Obukhov length is given by (2) and where in convective conditions, (Panofsky and Dutton, 1984), (3) and in stable-neutral conditions, (van Ulden and Holtslag, 1985), (4) where the constants =0.7, =0.75, =5.0, and =0.35. Following van Ulden and Holtslag (1985) for the turning (veering) of the wind direction with height, we use (5) where is output from the meteorological input module. This expression is calculated but is not used by the model. P09/01X/17 Page 3 of 11

3.2 Turbulence profiles These formulae are detailed in Hunt, Holroyd and Carruthers (1988). There are three sets of formulae depending on whether 0.3, 0.3 1, or 1, when the conditions correspond to unstable (convective) conditions, near neutral flow and stable conditions, respectively. In the model, these expressions are used with values of up to 1.2. Values of greater than 1.2 are set to 1.2 for the turbulence calculations. In unstable conditions ( -0.3) the mixed layer velocity scale is given by (6) and we take (7a) (7b) (7c) where (8a) (8b) and and denote the contributions from convectively driven and mechanically driven turbulence respectively. In neutral conditions (-0.3 1.0), and in stable conditions ( 1.0), (9a) (9b) (9c) (10a) (10b) (10c) The profiles of are not used except for longitudinal dispersion of finite-duration releases. P09/01X/17 Page 4 of 11

The parameter is used to represent the changing characteristics depending on whether conditions are ideal (i.e. no waves or instabilities) or disturbed. The following criteria are used over flat terrain with no building effects. (11) When the complex terrain, building and coast options are used, = 0.5 for all. In an urban situation, there will always be some turbulence even in near-calm conditions because of the effects of local topography. This is accounted for in the model by applying a minimum value to the turbulence parameters and where depends on the minimum Monin- Obukhov length as follows: Furthermore, in the presence of variable terrain height, it is unlikely that turbulence will be negligible even if the upstream wind speed is very low. Hence when modelling complex terrain, a further minimum value of 0.1m/s is imposed on and. Alternatively, the user can specify a value of which overrides the and complex terrain default values. 3.3 Turbulence length and time scales and energy dissipation rate We assume, following Hunt, Stretch and Britter [4], that the vertical length scale is determined both by local shear and the blocking effect of the surface, and that it is limited by the boundary layer depth so that over flat terrain (12a) and (12b) where is a length scale given by for otherwise P09/01X/17 Page 5 of 11

and where is the buoyancy frequency and the other symbols have their usual meanings. In the case (Equation 12b), the third term was previously, however results in a length scale at the centre of the boundary layer more consistent with observations (Caughey and Palmer 1979). The additional term allows for the decrease in the length scale near the top of the boundary layer due to the capping inversion and stable layer above (Carruthers and Hunt 1986). The scale of the transverse motions is determined principally by the boundary layer height. We assume neutral and stable conditions -0.3 (13a) convective conditions -0.3 (13b) For the Lagrangian time scale and energy dissipation rate we have (14a) and (14b) for (15a) and for (15b) 3.4 Buoyancy frequency The buoyancy frequency in the boundary layer is calculated from (16) In stable conditions,, the dimensionless temperature gradient is approximately equal to the dimensionless wind shear, i.e. (17) P09/01X/17 Page 6 of 11

Therefore, from (1), (2) and (4), (18a) This formula is only valid in the lowest part of the boundary layer, i.e.. For we use. We assume that (18b,c) In stable conditions when equations (18) apply, but for (unstable), for since departures from zero are small except very near the surface. 3.5 Potential Temperature The potential temperature profile is calculated by assuming that at screen height temperature is equal to potential temperature. 1.22m, the In stable conditions and neutral conditions when, from (18) (19a,b,c) where and is given by equation (4). In convective conditions the dimensionless temperature gradient is approximately related to the dimensionless wind shear as. Thus, from (1), (2) and (3), the potential temperature profile is (20a,b) where and. 3.6 Temperature Temperature profiles can be calculated from (18), (19) and (20) by assuming P09/01X/17 Page 7 of 11

(21a) where 0.01 C/m is the adiabatic lapse rate. ( 9.807 m/s 2 ; 1000 J/kg C). Therefore (21b) 3.7 Pressure The pressure is given in millibar and is calculated from the absolute and potential temperatures using the perfect gas relationships: (22) where is the pressure at screen height taken as 1013.0 mbar, and for. 3.8 Specific Humidity The humidity output from the boundary layer structure module is in terms of specific humidity. In the boundary layer it is easiest to parameterise specific humidity directly. We adopt profiles in the boundary layer identical to those for potential temperature (see above) with the following substitutions: Here, the specific latent heat of vaporisation, is taken to be (2.5008 10 6 2.3 10 3 ) J/kg (Gill 1982). is the screen level specific humidity and is the surface latent heat flux. Above the boundary layer we parameterise relative humidity directly as (23) This is then converted to a specific humidity as follows. First the saturation vapour pressure is obtained from a formula by Wexler [8] (see P26/01). This is converted to a saturated mixing ratio using (24) where 0.62197 is the ratio of the molecular weight of water to that of dry air. Then the P09/01X/17 Page 8 of 11

mixing ratio is obtained as (25) and converted to a specific humidity using (26) We allow the possibility of humidity exceeding saturation but impose a lower limit of zero on. P09/01X/17 Page 9 of 11

4. User-input vertical profile data The user can input vertical profiles of one or more of wind speed, turbulence parameters, temperature and specific humidity. Data are entered at a sequence of heights for each modelled meteorological condition. To obtain the value at a particular height for use in the dispersion calculations, an interpolation procedure is used, which combines a linear interpolation of the user-input data with the standard ADMS boundary layer structure algorithms, to produce a profile fitted to the user-input data but similar in shape to the standard ADMS profile. The interpolation procedure is as follows. Step 1 The user-input data are linearly interpolated to the required height. Step 2 The standard ADMS value is calculated at the required height Step 3 The standard ADMS value is calculated at the user-input data points immediately above and below the required height and linearly interpolated to the required height Step 4 The ratio of the value calculated in Step 2 to the value calculated in Step 3 is applied to the value obtained in Step 1. i.e. the value of quantity at height is given by (27) where is the ADMS boundary layer structure function, is the user-input profile, is the closest user-input data point above the required height, is the closest user-input data point below the required height, and is a weighting given by (28) Above the highest user-input data point, the value is given by (29) where is the highest user-input data height. Similarly, below the lowest user-input data point, the value is given by (30) where is the lowest user-input data height. There is one exception to equation (30): the wind speed at ground level is always assumed to be zero. Note that the change in wind speed with height,, is also required for dispersion calculations. This quantity is always calculated using the standard ADMS profile rather than from the user-input data, in order to avoid numerical errors. P09/01X/17 Page 10 of 11

References [1] Hunt, J.C.R., Holroyd, R.H. and Carruthers, D.J. (1988) Preparatory studies for a complex dispersion model, CERC Report HB9/88. [2] Panofsky, H.A. and Dutton, A. (1984) Atmospheric Turbulence. Wiley. [3] van Ulden, A.P. and Holtslag, A.A.M. (1985) Estimation of atmospheric boundary layer parameters for diffusion applications. J. Clim. Appl. Met. 24, 1194-1207. [4] Hunt, J.C.R., Stretch, D.D. and Britter, R.B. (1988) Length scales in stably stratified turbulent flows and their use in turbulent models in stably stratified flow and dense gas dispersion. Proceedings IMA Conference. Oxford University Press, pp.430. [5] Caughey, S.J. and Palmer, S.G. (1979) Includes data from four experiments carried out at Ashchurch over four days in July 1976. It is not possible to identify specific values of the stability parameter z i /L with individual experiments. Q.J.R. Met. Soc., 105, 811-827. [6] Carruthers, D.J. and Hunt, J.C.R. (1986) Velocity fluctuations near an interface between a turbulent region and a stably stratified layer. J. Fluid Mech., 165, 475-501. [7] Gill, A.E. (1982) Atmospheric-ocean dynamics. Academic Press. [8] Wexler, A. (1976) Vapour pressure formulation for water in the range 0 to 100. A revision. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 80A, 775-785. P09/01X/17 Page 11 of 11