Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Similar documents
Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

1. Estimate the lifetime of an excited state of hydrogen. Give your answer in terms of fundamental constants.

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 4 Fall 2009

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2005 Assignment 10

Quantum Mechanics II

( ) in the interaction picture arises only

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

PHY 407 QUANTUM MECHANICS Fall 05 Problem set 1 Due Sep

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2016 Assignment 3

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PHYSICS 505 FINAL EXAMINATION. January 18, 2013, 1:30 4:30pm, A06 Jadwin Hall SOLUTIONS

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points)

Chemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam III. All Hallows Eve/Samhain, ) This is a multiple choice exam. Circle the correct answer.

Physics 742 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 2 Solutions to Second Exam, Spring 2017

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet

+E v(t) H(t) = v(t) E where v(t) is real and where v 0 for t ±.

Light - Atom Interaction

Errata for Quantum Mechanics by Ernest Abers August 1, 2004

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

PHYSICS 721/821 - Spring Semester ODU. Graduate Quantum Mechanics II Midterm Exam - Solution

Physics 137A Quantum Mechanics Fall 2012 Midterm II - Solutions

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Approximation Methods in QM

(a) Write down the total Hamiltonian of this system, including the spin degree of freedom of the electron, but neglecting spin-orbit interactions.

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam III. March 28, ) Circle the correct answer on multiple-choice problems.

Quantum Mechanics Exercises and solutions

Open quantum systems

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0)

0 + E (1) and the first correction to the ground state energy is given by

Physics 216 Problem Set 4 Spring 2010 DUE: MAY 25, 2010

University of Michigan Physics Department Graduate Qualifying Examination

Scattering amplitude and partial waves. f(θ) = (2l + 1)f l P l (cos(θ)) (3)

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Addition of Angular Momenta

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

The interaction of light and matter

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

Solution of Second Midterm Examination Thursday November 09, 2017

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics PVK - Solutions. Nicolas Lanzetti

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

1 Commutators (10 pts)

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter

Classical Mechanics Comprehensive Exam

B2.III Revision notes: quantum physics

In the following, we investigate the time-dependent two-component wave function ψ(t) = ( )

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Department of Physics College Park, Maryland. PHYSICS Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAMINATION PART II

量子力学 Quantum mechanics. School of Physics and Information Technology

Perturbation Theory. Andreas Wacker Mathematical Physics Lund University

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 19 The Stark Effect in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

2

So far, we considered quantum static, as all our potentials did not depend on time. Therefore, our time dependence was trivial and always the same:

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Reading: Mathchapters F and G, MQ - Ch. 7-8, Lecture notes on hydrogen atom.

Solution to Problem Set No. 6: Time Independent Perturbation Theory

We now turn to our first quantum mechanical problems that represent real, as

Further Quantum Mechanics Problem Set

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension

Lecture 5: Harmonic oscillator, Morse Oscillator, 1D Rigid Rotor

Physics PhD Qualifying Examination Part I Wednesday, January 21, 2015

( r) = 1 Z. e Zr/a 0. + n +1δ n', n+1 ). dt ' e i ( ε n ε i )t'/! a n ( t) = n ψ t = 1 i! e iε n t/! n' x n = Physics 624, Quantum II -- Exam 1

22.02 Intro to Applied Nuclear Physics

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prelude to Nuclear Shell Model) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle In the microscopic world,

Quantum Mechanics (Draft 2010 Nov.)

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS by Lawrence R. Mead, Prof. Physics, USM

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 5

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10

Solution Set 3. Hand out : i d dt. Ψ(t) = Ĥ Ψ(t) + and

Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 5 Fall 2009

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Cold molecules: Theory. Viatcheslav Kokoouline Olivier Dulieu

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

The Schrodinger Equation and Postulates Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case:

Deformed (Nilsson) shell model

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2005 Assignment 9

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

Physics 742 Graduate Quantum Mechanics 2 Midterm Exam, Spring [15 points] A spinless particle in three dimensions has potential 2 2 2

MATH325 - QUANTUM MECHANICS - SOLUTION SHEET 11

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Outline

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Adiabatic particle pumping and anomalous velocity

A Review of Perturbation Theory

8.05 Quantum Physics II, Fall 2011 FINAL EXAM Thursday December 22, 9:00 am -12:00 You have 3 hours.

Transcription:

Quantum Physics III (8.6) Spring 8 Final Exam Solutions May 19, 8 1. Short answer questions (35 points) (a) ( points) α 4 mc (b) ( points) µ B B, where µ B = e m (c) (3 points) In the variational ansatz, take each electron to be in the electric field of a nucleus with charge Ze < e. (d) (3 points) e h (e) (3 points) ( dn ) dσ dω = dωdt detector ( dn dadt ) in (1) (f) The scattering boundary condition ( points): as r The differential cross section can be written as ( points) (g) (3 points) Φ = n hc e (h) (3 points) (1 13 ) (i) (3 points) (1 13 ) (j) (3 points) (1 13 ) with n an integer. ψ e ikz + eikr f(θ, φ) () r dσ dω = f(θ, φ) (3) (k) (6 points) 1 5, 6, 3 3, 4 4, 5 1, 6.. Particle on a ring (1 points) (a) For each eigenvalue, it is two-fold degenerate ( points). The WKB wave functions are (3 points) 1 ψ(x) e ± i x dx p(x ) (4) p(x) where p(x) = m(e V (x)) (5) 1

(b) (5 points) The wave functions should be single-valued on the circle, i.e. ψ() = ψ(l). Thus we require L 3. Born approximation (16 points) dx p(x) = πn, n = ±1, ±, (6) (a) (1 points) The 1st Born approximation for the amplitude of scattering off a single atom at x = is given by f 1 (θ, φ) = m π d 3 x exp( i q x)v( x) = mv ) π d 3 x exp ( i q x x b = πb 3 mv e 1 b q (7) The simplest way to evaluate the integral in the second line is to use the Cartesian coordinates and it then becomes a product of three Gaussian integrals. Thus we find that with dσ 1 dω = f 1(θ) = ( πb 3 mv ) e b q q = 4k sin θ (b) (6 points) Now with the full potential, we find that f(θ, φ) = = m π d 3 x exp( i q x)v ( x) = mv π d 3 x exp( i q x)v( x X i ) ( i ) = e i q X i f 1 (θ, φ) (8) We thus find that 4. Partial wave expansion ( points) i dσ dω = dσ 1 dω e i q X i (a) ( point) Since the first term in f(θ) is independent of θ, and the second term is proportional to cos θ, the partial waves that are active are l = and l = 1. (b) (1 points) Recalling the expansion f(θ) = l (l + 1)P l(cos θ)f l, we identify ( points) f = 1 Γk k k k ikγ = 1 Γk(k k + ikγ) k (k k) + (Γk), i (9)

Since f = 1 k eiδ sin δ = 1 k (cos δ sin δ + i sin δ ), we find that (3 points) sin δ = Γk (k k) + (Γk). As k, sin δ δ (Γ/k )k. This goes like k, as we expect (1 point). For l = 1, we have ( points) f 1 = 1 k eiβk3 sin(βk 3 ) = 1 k sin δ 1e iδ 1, and therefore (1 point) δ 1 = βk 3. This goes to as k 3, again as we expect (1 point). (c) (3 point) the total cross-section is σ tot = 4π ( sin k δ + 3 sin ) 4π δ 1 = k [ (Γk) ] (k k) + (Γk) + 3 sin (βk 3 ) (1) (d) (5 points) The optical theorem is (3 points) σ tot = 4π k Imf(θ = ) (11) Since ( points) Imf() = 1 [ (Γk) ] k (k k) + (Γk) + 3 sin (βk 3 ). we conclude that the optical theorem is satisfied. 5. Semi-classical approximation of phase shift ( points) (a) (5 points) As r, u(r) ( points). As r (3 points), u(r) e ikr e iδ e ikr e iδ sin(kr + δ ) (1) (b) (5 points) The WKB wave function can be written as ψ(r) = c + p(r) e i r dx p(x) + c p(r) e i r dx p(x) (13) with p(r) = k U(r), U(r) = m V (r) Note that p(r) defined above is related by standard definition by a factor of 1/. The boundary condition at r = implies that ψ(r) 1 ( r ) sin dx p(x) p(r) (14) 3

(c) (6 points) Note that as r, r dx p(x) kr + dx (p(x) k) + O(1/r) (15) Comparing equations (1), (14) and (15) we thus conclude that ( δ = dx (p(x) k) = dx k U(x) k) (d) (4 points) As k, we find that (note that U(r) < ) ( points) δ = (16) dx U(r) (17) which is not the right behavior, since we expect δ k as k. The reason is that for k, E can get close to V (r) and thus the WKB approximation is not good. ( points) 6. A time-dependent two-state system (16 points) (a) (4 points) We should choose A(t) so that A(± ) B, while A( ) and A( ) have opposite sign (3 points). An example is A(t) = vt with v a small, positive constant. (b) (4 points) The gap at t = is given by B. The time period δt in which the gap between two states of system is of order B is vδt B δt B v We need B B δt v 1 (c) (8 points) Note that the eigenvalues of H(t) are time-dependent and are given by ±K. At t = the system is in an eigenvector of H(t = ) with eigenvalue K. In adiabatic approximation, the system will remain in the eigenvector of H(t) with eigenvalue K. At time T = π f, where we have H(T ) = H(), we thus have ( points) Thus we find the dynamical phase is given by ( points) ψ(t ) = e iθ+(t )+iγ+(t ) ψ(t = ) (18) θ + (T ) = 1 πk KT = f To find the geometric phase, we note that the Hamiltonian is the same as that of a spin- 1 particle in a rotating magnetic field given by ( points) B (K sin ft,, K cos ft) At from t = to t = T = πf, the magnetic field transverses a full circle in the x z plane. The geometry phase is then given by (since the solid angle of the circle with respect to the origin is π) ( points) γ + (T ) = π 4

Thus we find that the total phase factor πk i e f 7. Two-dimensional anharmonic oscillator: perturbation theory (4 points) In the problem we set m = ω = = 1. Note that Thus x 1 = 1 (a 1 + a 1 ), x = 1 (a + a ) H = 1 λ(a 1 + a 1 ) (a + a ) (a) (4 points) Θ commutes with the full Hamiltonian since the Hamiltonian is invariant under the exchange of labels 1 ( points). Thus one can diagonalize H and Θ simultaneously and the energy eigenfunction should satisfy ( points) (b) (6 points) The ground state is,. So we have ψ n (x 1, x ) = ±ψ n (x, x 1 ) (19) δe = 1 λ, (a 1 + a 1 ) (a + a ), = 1 λ, a 1a 1 a a, = 1 λ (c) (7 points) The first order correction to the ground state wave function can be written as ψ (1) = (n,m) (,) m, n m, n H E E m,n () Note that m, n H, = λ m x 1 n x where n denote an energy eigenstates for a single harmonic oscillator. Since m x = 1 m (a + a ) = δ m, + 1 δ m, we conclude that the only nonzero matrix elements in m, n H, for (m, n) (, ) are, H, =, H, = λ,, H, = λ (1) where the second expression is obtained by 1 symmetry. Note that E, E, = E, E, = and E, E, = 4. We thus find that ψ (1) = λ 4 (, +, +, ) () This expression is symmetric under 1 as one would expect for the ground state. 5

(d) (7 points) There are two first excited states, 1 and 1,. We thus need to use degenerate perturbation theory. Since Θ commutes with H. The good states should be eigenstates of Θ, in which H is automatically diagonal. The good states are ± = 1 ( 1, ±, 1 ), Θ ± = ± ± We thus need only to compute + H + and H. For this purpose, let us note that, 1 H, 1 = 1 λ, 1 (a 1 + a 1 ) (a + a ), 1 = 3λ = 1, H 1,, 1 H 1, = 1 λ, 1 (a 1 + a 1 ) (a + a ) 1, = Since the off-diagonal terms are zero, we find that the first excited states remind degenerate to 1st order with an energy correction δe = 3λ. In particular the Hamiltonian is diagonal in any choice of basis. (Due to this degeneracy the basis of good states does not have a special role at this order.) 8. Two-dimensional anharmonic oscillator: variational approach (3 points) Note: in choosing trial wave functions, we should consider functions which have right symmetry properties discussed in part (a) of last problem. (a) (5 points) The trial wave function for the ground state should be symmetric under the exchange of 1 and. We thus consider the following (normalized) trial wave function a ψ(x 1, x ) = 1 +x ) (3) π e 1 a(x The unperturbed ground state wave function of H corresponds to setting a = 1 in the above equation. Thus if we minimize the energy expectation value of ψ with respect to a, we are warranted to do no worse than the first order perturbation theory. (b) (1 points) We need to minimize Note that ( a ) ψ H ψ = λ π ψ H ψ = Minimizing E(a) we find that ( a π ) (1 + a ) E(a) = ψ H + H ψ (4) dx 1 dx x 1x e a(x 1 +x ) = λ a dx 1 dx x 1 e a(x 1 +x ) = 1 + a a λ a 3 + 1 1 a = a3 λ a = In the large λ limit, we find that a min = (λ) 1 3 and an upper bound on energy E(a min ) = 3 4 a min 6

(c) (6 points) For example, the trial functions for one of the first excited states can be chosen to be ψ(x 1, x ) = A(x 1 x )e a (x 1 +x ) This wave function is antisymmetric in 1 and includes 1,, 1 as a special example. Thus it is orthogonal to the (exact) ground state and will give an estimate of energy no worse than the first order perturbation theory. (Note in grading we gave full credits to any wave functions which are orthogonal to the ground state trial wave functions.) 9. Three-dimensional harmonic oscillators: Transition amplitudes (16 points) (a) (6 points) Note the amplitude to be in a state b starting from a state a is given by (with = m = ω = 1) In our case c b = 1 i T dt H ba(t)e iω bat, ω ba = E b E a H ba = λ 1,, (a 1 + a 1 )(a + a ), 1, = λ ω ba = We thus find that and c b = iλt P a b = λ T (b) (3 points) For perturbation theory to be valid we need the first order wave function to be much smaller than zeroth order one, i.e. c b 1, which leads Note that requiring λ 1 is not enough. λt 1 (c) (7 points) Note that the rate for spontaneous emission is given by where A = 4ω3 ba 3c 3 p ab p ab =,, e r 1,, is the matrix element of the dipole operation e r. The only nonzero component of the above expression is p (x) ab = e,, a 1 + a 1 1,, = e 7

while ω ba = 1 We thus find that The lifetime A = e 3c 3 τ = 1 A = 3c3 e Note that restoring m, ω and the final expression becomes A = e ω 3mc 3 = ω 3 ω c mc e 8