remsstrahlung 1 Bremsstrahlung

Similar documents
Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

Passage of particles through matter

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

1. Common to all charged particles ffl ionization (ο kev!) ffl Coulomb scattering from nuclei (ο kev!) ffl Cerenkov effect ffl transition radiation 2.

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Particle Interactions in Detectors

27. PASSAGE OF PARTICLES THROUGH MATTER

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Radiation from Charged Particle Interaction with Matter

Monte Carlo radiation transport codes

Interaction of Particles with Matter

Monte Carlo radiation transport codes

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

High-energy collision processes involving intense laser fields

Gaseous Detectors. Bernhard Ketzer University of Bonn

Detectors for High Energy Physics

Neutrino detection. Kate Scholberg, Duke University International Neutrino Summer School Sao Paulo, Brazil, August 2015

THIS work is devoted to the description of the simulation

Electron-positron production in kinematic conditions of PrimEx

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Particle-Matter Interactions

2.8.1 Properties of Electron Bremsstrahlung

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (40 hours)

BREMSSTRAHLUNG IN A THIN LAYER OF MATTER AT HIGH ENERGY

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Prompt Radiation Fields at Accelerators

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Signal Characteristics from Electromagnetic Cascades in Ice

6. QED. Particle and Nuclear Physics. Dr. Tina Potter. Dr. Tina Potter 6. QED 1

PHYS 352. Charged Particle Interactions with Matter. Intro: Cross Section. dn s. = F dω

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

New photon transport model in Serpent 2

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

The interaction of radiation with matter

General Information. Muon Lifetime Update. Today s Agenda. The next steps. Reports due May 14

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 23 Mar 2015

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 24. Exam 2 Particle Detectors

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

ELECTROMAGNETIC SHOWERS. Paolo Lipari. Lecture 2

Atomic Structure and Processes

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

First indication of LPM effect in LHCf, an LHC experiment

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 25. Particle Detectors

Interazioni delle particelle cariche. G. Battistoni INFN Milano

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 4 Mar 1999

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

2nd-Meeting. Ionization energy loss. Multiple Coulomb scattering (plural and single scattering, too) Tracking chambers

Chapter II: Interactions of ions with matter

Production of e + e pairs to all orders in Zα for collisions of high-energy muons with heavy nuclei

for the production of lepton pairs and photons in collisions of relativistic nuclei

Pion Form Factor Measurement at BESIII

Chapter 2 Problem Solutions

- ~200 times heavier than the e GeV µ travels on average. - does not interact strongly. - does emit bremsstrahlung in

Calorimetry in. in Nuclear and Particle Physics Experiments

Passage of Charged Particles in matter. Abstract:

Interaction of Particles and Matter

The LHCf data hadronic interactions and UHECR showers. Paolo Lipari LHCf meeting Catania, 6th july 2011

Investigation of jet quenching and elliptic flow within a pqcd-based partonic transport model

Motivation. g-spectroscopy deals with g-ray detection and is one of the most relevant methods to investigate excited states in nuclei.

Hadronic Showers. KIP Journal Club: Calorimetry and Jets 2009/10/28 A.Kaplan & A.Tadday

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 3

Heavy charged particle passage through matter

^ He, Li. INITIAL STUDIES OF GEANT and COMPARISONS with EGS. ^/vo-ffr<-y^-/^ 7. 2 Material Generation. W. Frati. September 8, 1990.

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

Experimental results on nucleon structure Lecture I. National Nuclear Physics Summer School 2013

Fluka advanced calculations on stopping power and multiple Coulomb scattering

Interaction with matter

An Accurate Measurement. Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal

The Strange Physics of Nonabelian Plasmas

Radiative Correction Introduction. Hanjie Liu Columbia University 2017 Hall A&C Analysis meeting

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect

Intense laser-matter interaction: Probing the QED vacuum

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

LET! (de / dx) 1 Gy= 1 J/kG 1Gy=100 rad. m(kg) dose rate

Form Factors with Electrons and Positrons

_ int (x) = e ψ (x) γμ ψ(x) Aμ(x)

Muonium Decay. Abstract

PHYS 571 Radiation Physics

Chapter Four (Interaction of Radiation with Matter)

Investigation of jet quenching and elliptic flow within a pqcd-based partonic transport model

Interaction of charged particles and photons with matter

Validation of EM Part of Geant4

Calorimetry I Electromagnetic Calorimeters

Basic physics Questions

The Electromagnetic Shift of Energy Levels

Transcription:

remsstrahlung 1 Bremsstrahlung

remsstrahlung 2 Bremsstrahlung A fast moving charged particle is decelerated in the Coulomb field of atoms. A fraction of its kinetic energy is emitted in form of real photons. The probability of this process is 1/M 2 (M: masse of the particle) and Z 2 (atomic number of the matter). Above a few tens MeV, bremsstrahlung is the dominant process for e- and e+ in most materials. It becomes important for muons (and pions) at few hundred GeV. γ e-

remsstrahlung 3 differential cross section The differential cross section is given by the Bethe-Heitler formula [Heitl57], corrected and extended for various effects: the screening of the field of the nucleus the contribution to the brems from the atomic electrons the correction to the Born approximation the polarisation of the matter (dielectric suppression) the so-called LPM suppression mechanism... See Seltzer and Berger for a synthesis of the theories [Sel85].

remsstrahlung 4 screening effect Depending of the energy of the projectile, the Coulomb field of the nucleus can be more on less screened by the electron cloud. A screening parameter measures the ratio of an impact parameter of the projectile to the radius of an atom, for instance given by a Thomas-Fermi approximation or a Hartree-Fock calculation. Then, screening functions are introduced in the Bethe-Heitler formula. Qualitatively: at low energy no screening effect at ultra relativistic electron energy full screening effect

remsstrahlung 5 electron-electron bremsstrahlung The projectile feels not only the Coulomb field of the nucleus (charge Ze), but also the fields of the atomic electrons (Z electrons of charge e). The bremsstrahlung amplitude is roughly the same in both cases, except the charge. Thus the electron cloud gives an additional contribution to the bremsstrahlung, proportional to Z (instead of Z 2 ).

remsstrahlung 6 Born approximation The derivation of the Bethe-Heitler formula is based on perturbation theory, using plane waves for the electron. If the validity of the Born approximation: β αz is violated for the initial and/or final velocity (low energy) the Coulomb waves would be used instead of the plane waves. To correct for this, a Coulomb correction function is introduced in the Bethe-Heitler formula.

remsstrahlung 7 high energies regime : E mc 2 /(αz 1/3 ) Above few GeV the energy spectrum formula becomes simple : ] dσ 4α r 2 1 e dk k where T sai {( 4 3 4 3 y + y2 ) (Z 2 [L rad f(z)] + ZL rad) } (1) k energy of the radiated photon ; y = k/e α fine structure constant r e classical electron radius: e 2 /(4πɛ 0 mc 2 ) L rad (Z) ln(184.15/z 1/3 ) (for Z 5) L rad (Z) ln(1194/z2/3 ) (for Z 5) f(z) Coulomb correction function

remsstrahlung 8 limits of the energy spectrum k min = 0 : In fact the infrared divergence is removed by the dielectric suppression mechanism, which is not shown in the formula 1. For k/e 10 4 : dσ/dk becomes proportional to k [Antho96] k max = E mc 2 E : In this limit, the screening is incomplete, and the expression 1 of the cross section is not completely accurate.

remsstrahlung 9 mean rate of energy loss due to bremsstrahlung de dx = n at k max E k min =0 n at is the number of atoms per volume. The integration immediately gives: with: k dσ dk dk (2) de dx = E X 0 (3) 1 def = 4α r 2 { e n at Z 2 [L rad f(z)] + ZL } rad X 0

remsstrahlung 10 Radiation Length The radiation length has been calculated by Y. Tsai [Tsai74] where α r e 1 = 4α r 2 { e n at Z 2 [L rad f(z)] + ZL } rad X 0 fine structure constant classical electron radius n at number of atoms per volume: N av ρ/a L rad (Z) ln(184.15/z 1/3 ) (for Z 5) L rad (Z) ln(1194/z2/3 ) (for Z 5) f(z) Coulomb correction function f(z) = a 2 [(1 + a 2 ) 1 + 0.20206 0.0369a 2 + 0.0083a 4 0.002a 6 ] with a = αz

remsstrahlung 11 main conclusion: The relation 3 shows that the average energy loss per unit path length due to the bremsstrahlung increases linearly with the initial energy of the projectile. equivalent: ) E(x) = E(0) exp ( xx0 This is the exponential attenuation of the energy of the projectile by radiation losses.

remsstrahlung 12 critical energy The total mean rate of energy loss is the sum of ionization and bremsstrahlung. The critical energy E c is the energy at which the two rates are equal. Above E c the total energy loss rate is dominated by bremsstrahlung. 200 400 100 Copper X 0 = 12.86 g cm 2 E c = 19.63 MeV 200 de/dx X 0 (MeV) 70 50 40 30 20 Rossi: Ionization per X 0 = electron energy Brems E Total Ionization Exact bremsstrahlung E c (MeV) 100 50 20 610 MeV Z + 1.24 Solids Gases 710 MeV Z + 0.92 Brems = ionization 10 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 Electron energy (MeV) 10 5 H He Li Be B CNO Ne Fe Sn 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 Z

remsstrahlung 13 de/dx for electrons Tables for ELECTRON in Aluminium LOSS (MeV/cm) electron kinetic energy (GeV)

remsstrahlung 14 e 1 GeV in 1 meter of Aluminium. Brems counted as continuous energy loss versus cascade development WORL RUN NR 1 EVENT NR 45 6 22/ 9/ 0 10 cm

remsstrahlung 15 fluctuations : Unlike the ionization loss which is quasicontinuous along the path length, almost all the energy can be emitted in one or two photons. Thus, the fluctuations on energy loss by bremstrahlung are large.

remsstrahlung 16 Energetic photons and truncated energy loss rate One may wish to take into account separately the high-energy photons emitted above a given threshold k cut (miss detection, explicit simulation...). Those photons must be excluded from the mean energy loss count. de dx ] k<k cut = n at n at is the number of atoms per volume. k cut k min =0 k dσ dk dk (4) Then, the truncated total cross-section for emitting hard photons is: σ(e, k cut k k max ) = k max E k cut dσ dk dk (5)

remsstrahlung 17 In the high energies regime, one can use the complete screened expression 1 of dσ/dk to integrate 5. This gives: for E k cut : σ br (E, k k cut ) 4 [ ] 1 E ln 3 n at X 0 k cut (6) The bremsstrahlung total cross section increases as ln E. (in fact, taking into account the LPM effect leads to σ br 1/ E when E > E lpm )

remsstrahlung 18 number of interactions per mm in Lead (cut 10 kev) electron kinetic energy (ln(mev))

remsstrahlung 19 final state The polar angle θ of γ is defined w. r. to the direction of the parent electron. The energy-angle is sampled from a density function suggested by Urban [geant3], as an approximation of the Tsai distribution [Tsai74] : u [0, [ : f(u) = 9a2 9 + d with : θ = (mc 2 /E) u [ ue au + d ue 3au] The azimuthal angle φ is generated isotropically.

remsstrahlung 20 e 200 MeV in 10 cm Aluminium WORL RUN NR 1 EVENT NR 1 11/ 9/ 0 1 cm

remsstrahlung 21 e 200 MeV in 10 cm Aluminium (cut: 1 MeV, 10 kev). Field 5 tesla WORL RUN NR 1 EVENT NR 2 11/ 9/ 0 WORL RUN NR 1 EVENT NR 2 11/ 9/ 0 1 cm 1 cm

remsstrahlung 22 Bremsstrahlung by high energy muon The bremsstrahlung cross section is proportional to 1/m 2. Thus the critical energy for muons scales as (m µ /m e ) 2, i.e. near the TeV. Bremsstrahlung dominates other muon interaction processes in the region of catastrophic collisions (y 0.1 ), at moderate muon energies - above knock on electron production kinematic limit. At high energies (E 1 TeV) this process contributes about 40% to average muon energy loss. See [Keln97] for up-to-date review and formulae.

remsstrahlung 23 formation length ([Antho96]) In the bremsstrahlung process the longitudinal momentum transfer from the nucleus to the electron can be very small. For E mc 2 and E k : q long k(mc2 ) 2 2E(E k) k 2γ 2 Thus, the uncertainty principle requires that the emission take place over a comparatively long distance : f v 2 hcγ2 k f v is called the formation length for bremsstrahlung in vacuum. It is the distance of coherence, or the distance required for the electron and photon to separate enough to be considered as separate particles. If anything happens to the electron or photon while traversing this distance, the emission can be disrupted. (7)

remsstrahlung 24 dielectric suppression mechanism The suppression is due to the photon interaction with the electron gas (Compton scattering) within the formation length. The magnitude of the process can be evaluated using classical electromagnetism [Ter72]. A dielectric medium is characterized by his dielectric function: ɛ(k) = 1 ( hω p /k) 2 with hω p = 4πn el r 3 e mc 2 /α (n el is the electron density of the medium = Zn at.) It can be shown that the formation length in this medium is reduced: 2 hcγ 2 k f m k 2 + (γ hω p ) 2 (8)

remsstrahlung 25 The effect is factorized in the bremsstrahlung differential cross section: [ ] dσ dσ dk = S d(k) dk T sai S d is called the suppression function : (9) S d (k) def = f m(k) f v (k) = k 2 k 2 + (γ hω p ) 2 (10) S d (k) is vanishing for k 2 (γ hω p ) 2 i.e. : Then, k E hω p mc 2 ( 10 4, 10 5 in all materials) (11) S d (k) k 2 (γ hω p ) 2 (12) which cancel the infrared divergence of the Bethe-Heitler formula.

remsstrahlung 26 Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal suppression mechanism The electron can multiple scatter with the atoms of the medium while it is still in the formation zone. If the angle of multiple scattering, θ ms, is greater than the typical emission angle of the emitted photon, θ br = mc 2 /E, the emission is suppressed. In the gaussian approximation : θms 2 = 2π α where f v is the formation length in vacuum, defined in equation 7. 1 f v (k) γ 2 X 0 Writing θms 2 > θbr 2 show that suppression becomes signifiant for photon energies below a certain value, given by k E < E lpm is a characteristic energy of the effect : E lpm = α 4π (mc 2 ) 2 hc X 0 = α2 4π mc 2 E E lpm (13) r e X 0 (7.7 T ev/cm) X 0 (cm) (14)

remsstrahlung 27

remsstrahlung 28 The multiple scattering increases q long by changing the direction and the momentum of the electron. One can show : ( ) k q long = [1 2γ 2 + (mc2 ) 2 ] f m (k) 2 hc E lpm where f m is the formation length in the material. On the other hand the uncertainty principle says : q long = hc/f m These two equations can be solved in f m : f m (k) 2 hcγ2 k k Elpm E 2 if k E lpm E 2 (15) Hence, the suppression function S lpm : S lpm (k) def = f m(k) f v (k) = k Elpm E 2 (k/e) (E/E lpm ) (16)

remsstrahlung 29 total suppression The LPM and dielectric mechanism both reduce the effective formation length. The suppressions do not simply multiply. The total suppression follows [Gal64] 1 S = 1 + 1 S d + S S 2 lpm

remsstrahlung 30

remsstrahlung 31 e- 10 Gev in Pb. Bremsstrahlung: gamma spectrum evts x 10-3 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 no LPM 0.1 with LPM 0.05 0-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 log10(e(mev)) energy distribution of photons at z=zplot

remsstrahlung 32 E146 (SLAC) data [Antho96]

G Bremsstrahlung 32-1 References [Heitl57] W. Heitler The Quantum theory of radiation, Oxford University Press (1957) [Gal64] V.M.Galitsky and I.I.Gurevich, Nuovo Cimento 32, 1820 (1964) [Ter72] M.L. Ter-Mikaelian High Energy Electromagnetic Processes in Condensed Media, John Wiley and Sons (1972) [Tsai74] Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46,815 (1974) Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49,421 (1977) [geant3] L.Urban in Geant3 writeup, section PHYS-211. Cern Program Library (1993) [Sel85] S.M. Seltzer and M.J. Berger, MIN 80, 12 (1985) [Antho96] P. Anthony et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76,3550 (1996)

G Bremsstrahlung 32-2 [PDG00] D.E. Groom et al. Particle Data Group. Rev. of Particle Properties. Eur. Phys. J. C15,1 (2000) http://pdg.lbl.gov/ [Keln97] S.R.Kelner, R.P.Kokoulin, A.A.Petrukhin. Preprint MEPhI 024-95, Moscow, 1995; CERN SCAN-9510048. S.R.Kelner, R.P.Kokoulin, A.A.Petrukhin. Phys. Atomic Nuclei, 60 (1997) 576. S.R.Kelner, R.P.Kokoulin, A.Rybin. Geant4 Physics Reference Manual, Cern (2000)