Study No: Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Statistical Methods:

Similar documents
Supplementary webappendix

Supplementary Appendix

NCCTG Status Report for Study N May 2010

The general concept of pharmacokinetics

East West Acupuncture & Wellness Center, Inc. Patient Intake Form

CASE REPORT FORM (April 2012)

NSABP PROTOCOL B-39 RTOG PROTOCOL 0413

January NCCTG Protocol No: N0927 Opened: September 3, 2009

Phase I design for locating schedule-specific maximum tolerated doses

NCCTG Status Report for Study N May 2010

PK-QT analysis of bedaquiline : Bedaquiline appears to antagonize its main metabolite s QTcF interval prolonging effect

Contribution of different oxazolidinones to the efficacy of novel regimens containing bedaquiline and pretomanid in murine models of TB

January 2011 NCIC CTG MA.20 (RTOG Endorsed) -1. Opened: December 14, 1999 Closed: February 2, 2007

12/1/17 OUTLINE KEY POINTS ELEMENTS WITH UNSTABLE NUCLEI Radioisotopes and Nuclear Reactions 16.2 Biological Effects of Nuclear Radiation

PHA 4123 First Exam Fall On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.

ADULT INTAKE FORM (13 and older) Name Date of First Visit Address City State Zip Code Telephone (home) (work) (cell) Is it ok to leave a message?

CTP-656 Tablet Confirmed Superiority Of Pharmacokinetic Profile Relative To Kalydeco in Phase I Clinical Studies

Supplementary Online Content

Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD Professor, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Initial Certification

of 2-Phenoxyethanol in B6D2F1 Mice

Practice of SAS Logistic Regression on Binary Pharmacodynamic Data Problems and Solutions. Alan J Xiao, Cognigen Corporation, Buffalo NY

Modesto Junior College Course Outline of Record ANAT 125

The dher2 immunotherapeutic consists of recombinant dher2 protein combined with the GSK s proprietary immunostimulant AS15.

CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus

MoveDMD: Phase 1/2 Trial of Edasalonexent, an NF-κB Inhibitor, in 4 to 7-Year Old Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

IVIVC Industry Perspective with Illustrative Examples

Intercontinental journal of pharmaceutical Investigations and Research

Modelling a complex input process in a population pharmacokinetic analysis: example of mavoglurant oral absorption in healthy subjects

CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION. Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus

Syllabus. BIO 172 Human Anatomy and Physiology II

Submitted for publication

Multicompartment Pharmacokinetic Models. Objectives. Multicompartment Models. 26 July Chapter 30 1

Case Study in the Use of Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling and Simulation for Design and Analysis of a Clinical Trial

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Crossword Puzzle on Discharge Education. Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Puzzle 1

Supplementary Material

This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform

Randomized dose-escalation design for drug combination cancer trials with immunotherapy

Improving a safety of the Continual Reassessment Method via a modified allocation rule

H E A LT H H I S T O RY

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics

Lecture 22: PHARMACY CALCULATIONS for Technicians Preparing Injectable Medications

Validation of the GastroPlus TM Software Tool and Applications

Guideline on adjustment for baseline covariates in clinical trials

What are you seeking treatment for? Have you ever had acupuncture before? If so, for what condition?

BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 1. Lecture 1: Intro to Biostatistics. Smoking: hazardous? FEV (l) Smoke

Effects of AG-348, a pyruvate kinase activator, in patients with pyruvate kinase deficiency: Updated results from the DRIVE PK study

Drug Dosage Forms Dr. Stephanie Farrell

Dosing In NONMEM Data Sets an Enigma

Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Patrick J. Heagerty PhD Department of Biostatistics University of Washington

Internal dose assessment of 177 Lu-DOTA-SP for quantification of arginine renal protection effect

PubH 7470: STATISTICS FOR TRANSLATIONAL & CLINICAL RESEARCH

Keywords: anti-coagulants, factor Xa, QSAR, Thrombosis. Introduction

Tetracycline Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th November 2009

APRIL 11-14, 2018 SWOG LYMPHOMA

Yen Chiropractic, LLC Personal Injury Patient Intake Form Page 1

ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY Revised 11/2010

Influence of Bacterial Growth Rate on Dose Optimization of Linezolid for Treatment of Tuberculosis

Essential Question Content Skills Assessment Standards. Anatomical terms. Homeostatic mechanisms. Characteristics of Life. Requirements for life

Premier Pain Consultants

Title: Department: Previous Version(s): Replaces:

G-CSF treatment of chemotherapy induced. neutropenia - Online supplement

Risk Assessment of Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium perfringens in ready to eat Egg Products

Address: City: State: Zip: Age: Birth Date: Marital Status: M S W D No. of Children. Your Employer: Occupation: Years on Job:

Radiation Emergencies -Preparing for Response-

Online supplement. Absolute Value of Lung Function (FEV 1 or FVC) Explains the Sex Difference in. Breathlessness in the General Population

Optimal Adaptive Designs for Dose Finding in Early Phase Clinical Trials

JEFFERSON COLLEGE VERTEBRATE ANATOMY

BAYESIAN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS IN A PHASE II DOSE-FINDING TRIAL WITH SURVIVAL ENDPOINT IN PATIENTS WITH B-CELL CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA

A Clinical Trial Simulation System, Its Applications, and Future Challenges. Peter Westfall, Texas Tech University Kuenhi Tsai, Merck Research Lab

Using ODEs to Model Drug Concentrations within the Field of Pharmacokinetics

Jefferies Gene Editing/Therapy Summit Matthew Kapusta, Interim Chief Executive Officer OCTOBER 11, 2016

Chapter 1. The Human Organism 1-1

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant Crossword Puzzle on Discharge Education

An extrapolation framework to specify requirements for drug development in children

Sioux Falls School District Anatomy and Physiology Holes Anatomy and Physiology Authors: Shier, Butler, and Lewis Glencoe/ McGraw hill

CHEM 200 Chapter 2 General Work Practices

CHL 5225H Advanced Statistical Methods for Clinical Trials: Multiplicity

Noncompartmental vs. Compartmental Approaches to Pharmacokinetic Data Analysis Paolo Vicini, Ph.D. Pfizer Global Research and Development David M.

THE IDENTIFICATION OF TWO UNKNOWN BACTERIA AFUA WILLIAMS BIO 3302 TEST TUBE 3 PROF. N. HAQUE 5/14/18

Nitroxoline Rationale for the NAK clinical breakpoints, version th October 2013

MEDLINE Clinical Laboratory Sciences Journals

Passaic County Technical Institute. Wayne, NJ. Anatomy and Physiology II Curriculum. August 2015

Chapter 2 Exercise Solutions. Chapter 2

S0819 Phase III. Coordinating Group: SWOG

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Non Prolotherapy Patient Intake Form

Modeling & Simulation to Improve the Design of Clinical Trials

2015 ESMO Translational Research Fellowship Report

Gentamicin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th February, 2009

Evidence synthesis for a single randomized controlled trial and observational data in small populations

Philip J Cimo DDS PA 650 West Bough Lane Ste #160 Houston TX

Lecture 7 Time-dependent Covariates in Cox Regression

BIOS 2041: Introduction to Statistical Methods

3 Results. Part I. 3.1 Base/primary model

Anatomy & Physiology Curriculum Map Date Content/Topics Objectives Activities/Assessments Aug. 7th- 21st

Chronic Granulomatous Disease Medical Management

Distributed analysis in multi-center studies

Clinical performance of Swelab Lumi 5-part hematology analyzer

Incorporating published univariable associations in diagnostic and prognostic modeling

Transcription:

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. Study No: VEG10003 Title : A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple, Escalation Study of GW786034 in Patients with Solid Tumors Rationale: Neoplastic growth and metastases depend upon tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of several proangiogenic molecules that play a pivotal role in both processes. Signalling via the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor (PDGFR) is involved in tumor angiogenesis. Preclinical data suggest that simultaneous targeting of VEGF and PDGF pathways may be more effective than targeting either one alone because of the potentially distinct and possibly interrelated mechanisms by which VEGFR and PDGFR signaling mediate tumor angiogenesis. Thus, combined inhibition of multiple VEGFRs and PDGFRs could potentially inhibit both angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, thereby inhibiting tumor growth and metastases. Pazopanib (GW786034) is an orally active, potent, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, and c-kit. Pazopanib had demonstrated inhibition of VEGF mediated endothelial cell proliferation, and anti-tumor activity in human tumor xenograft models. This study was the first doseescalation Phase I study of pazopanib in subjects with solid tumors. Phase: I Study Period: 16 Dec 2002-21 Sep 2006 Study Design: Multicenter, Phase I, open-label, non-randomized, multiple dose-finding study. Subjects received a single dose of pazopanib on Day 1 followed by approximately 96 hours of pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. Multiple dosing began after PK analyses of plasma pazopanib cntration-time data from Day 1 were available (approximately 1 week after drug administration) in the first cohort, and after PK sampling was completed following the Day 1 dose in subsequent cohorts. Pharmacokinetic samples were obtained up to 96 hours. Daily dosing with 800 mg commenced after the 96 hour PK sample was collected. Pharmacokinetic samples were obtained after 21 consecutive days of dosing. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose of pazopanib administered at which no more than one of six subjects experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLTs were defined as follows: Grade 3 or 4 clinically significant non-hematological toxicity. Grade 3 hypertension was evaluated and managed as outlined in the protocol and did not necessarily represent a DLT Hematological toxicity, including Grade 4 granulocytopenia lasting at least days, febrile neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia Grade 3 or 4. Treatment delay of 14 days or greater due to unresolved toxicity Greater than or equal to Grade 2 non-hematological toxicity that persisted beyond the first 22 days of dosing that in the judgement of the investigator and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) medical monitor was dose-limiting Certain Grade 2 toxicity (e.g. renal, neurological, cardiovascular, gastro-intestinal) which in the judgement of the investigator and GSK medical monitor was dose-limiting. Centres: Two centers in the United States Indication: Adult subjects with solid tumors Treatment: Sixty- subjects received oral doses of pazopanib ranging from (TIW) to 2000 mg. Objectives: The primary objectives were (1) to assess the safety and tolerability of oral pazopanib after multiple dosing in cancer subjects and (2) to characterize the PK of pazopanib after single dose and multiple dose administration. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of pazopanib on biomarkers of angiogenesis activity in order to estimate biologic activity and to determine the minimum biologically active dose, to observe clinical response as described in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. Statistical Methods: Adverse events (AEs), vital signs data and laboratory data (chemistry, hematology, coagulation, and urinalysis) were summarized. Plasma cntration data were summarized. PK endpoints included area under the plasma drug cntration-time curve to the time of the last measurable cntration (AUClast), area under the plasma drug cntration-time curve to 24 hours post-dose (AUC(0-24)), maximum observed plasma cntration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and elimination half-life (t1/2), if there were sufficient data. A descriptive summary was presented by dose cohort and study day. -proportionality of AUC and Cmax for pazopanib was assessed using a regression model and evaluated visually in graphical form. Overall tumor response was categorized into one of the following categories: progressive disease, stable disease (SD), 1

partial response (PR), and complete response. Data were listed and summarized by category and dose cohort. The safety population consisted of all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug. The PK population included all subjects for whom a PK sample was obtained and analyzed. All subjects who received an active dose of pazopanib, and had evaluable PK data were included in the formal statistical analysis of the PK data. PD analyses were exploratory in nature and a formal PD population was not defined. Study Population: Subjects were male or female, at least 21 years of age, with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than or equal to 70%, and with a histologically-confirmed diagnosis of advanced solid tumor refractory to standard therapy or for whom no standard therapy existed. Number of Subjects Levels 1 through 7): Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 200 mg Level 6 300 mg Level 7 Entered N 7 9 2 3 3 6 4 d N 7 9 2 3 3 6 4 Completed n 5 (71) 6 (67) 1 (50) 2 (67) 3 (100) 5 (83) 4 (100) Total Number Subjects Prematurely Withdrawn a N Reasons for Premature Withdrawal Withdrawn due to Adverse Events n Withdrawn due to Progressive Disease, n Withdrawn for Other Reasons, n Number of Subjects Levels 8 through 13): 2 (29) 3 (33) 1 (50) 1 (33) 0 1 (17) 0 1 (14) 3 (33) 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 0 0 1 (50) 1 (33) 0 0 0 1 (14) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Level 8 Level 9 600 mg Level 10 800 mg Level 11 1000 mg Level 12 1 Level 13 2000 mg Entered N 3 3 14 3 3 3 63 d N 3 3 14 3 3 3 63 Completed n 3 (100) 3 (100) 14 (100) 2 (67) 2 (67) 3 (100) 53 (84) Total Number Subjects Prematurely Withdrawn a N Reasons for Premature Withdrawal Withdrawn due to Adverse Events n Withdrawn due to Progressive Disease, n Total 0 0 0 1 (33) 1 (33) 0 10 (16) 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 6 (10) 0 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 3 (5) Withdrawn for Other Reasons, n 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) a. Premature withdrawal was defined as those subjects who stopped taking study drug within the first 22 days of the study (inclusive of Day 22) Demographics N 63 Females: Males 28:35 Mean Age in Years (sd) 56.5 (12.07) Mean Weight, kg (SD) 78.25 (17.363) 2

White n 52 (83) 3

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Results: Study Day 1 Plasma pazopanib cntrations were measurable in all subjects. Overall, mean Cmax and AUC(0-24) on Day 1 increased as the pazopanib dose increased, with the highest mean values observed in the 2000 mg dose group. However, mean Cmax and AUC(0-24) on Day 1 increased in a less than proportional fashion with increasing dose over the entire range of doses examined. Pazopanib was eliminated slowly with mean t1/2 values ranging from 18.1 to 52.3 hours for the TIW to 2000 mg dose levels. The geometric mean t1/2 was 30.9 hours in the 800 mg dose group with 95% confidence interval (22.1, 43.2). Study Day 22 The Cmax and AUC values were greater following repeated administration compared with single dose administration at dose levels from TIW to 2000 mg, indicating accumulation following multiple dosing. Mean plasma AUC(0-24) values on Day 22 of pazopanib administration were approximately 1.23- to 4.0-fold greater than mean values observed after single doses. There was no trend apparent in the accumulation ratio versus pazopanib dose at dose levels from to 800 mg. Mean accumulation ratios and the ratio of AUC(0-24) at steady state and AUC(0- ) calculated in dose cohorts of to 2000 mg suggest that there were no obvious time-dependent changes in the PK of pazopanib. Steady-state exposure to pazopanib appeared to plateau at the 800 mg dose. Mean AUC(0-24) and Cmax on Day 22 did not increase, or increased only modestly, when the dose increased to greater than 800 mg. The difference between mean Cmax values on Day 22 in the 300 mg BID and BID dose groups was less than 10% and both values were less than the mean Cmax values in the 800 mg and 1000 mg cohorts. However, mean C24 (trough cntration) values on Day 22 were similar in all four dosing regimens. There were no obvious time-dependent changes in pazopanib PK after 22 days of 300 mg BID or BID dosing. Median tmax values ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 hours and 2.0 to 8.0 hours following single and multiple dose administration, respectively. A MTD was not determined in this trial, in part because a plateau in exposure was encountered at doses of 800 mg. However, clinical and biological effects were observed more frequently in association with a Day 22 C24 of at least 15,000 ng/ml, which was achieved in 93% of subjects receiving doses of at least 800 mg. Parameter Day Level 1 AUC(0-24) (μg*h/ml) 1 63.3 a (28.7) (CVb%) 22 91.5 e (43.6) AUC(0-12) (μg*h/ml) (CVb%) Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 200 mg Level 6 300 mg 51.8 b (24.0) 89.4 f (20.6) 96.9 (17.6) 104.5 (54.6) 157.7 e 209.3 g 160.7 f 384.8 (54.2) (NC) (9.4) (29.3) 22 NR NR NR NR NR 379.8 e (36.4) Level 7 120.1 142.8 c (56.0) (89.2) NC 447.1 (31.3) NR Cmax (μg/ml) (CVb%) 1 22 4.5 a (28.8) 5.8 e (40.3) 3.3 h (22.6) 8.4 a (35.2) 6.3 f (33.5) 12.2 f (13.2) 6.5 (25.7) 11.0 f (4.6) 7.5 (54.5) 23.7 (8.7) 8.4 a (51.0) 36.7 e (36.1) 10.3 c (82.0) 21.8 c (56.3) t1/2 (h) 1 36.6 42.2 NC 33.4 34.3 g 39.3 c 33.9 c tmax (h) j 1 2.5 a 3.0 h 3.0 f 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 c 22 3.0 e 3.0 a 8.0 f 8.0 f 2.0 4.0 e 3.0 c C24 (μg/ml) 1 1.7 i (41.7) (CVb%) 22 2.9 a (44.8) Parameter Day Level 8 1.5 h (45.5) 5.1 a (57.9) Level 9 600 mg 3.0 f (16.0) 7.5 f (25.9) Level 10 800 mg 2.8 (11.2) 4.9 f (71.1) Level 11 1000 mg 2.9 (53.6) 12.4 (35.9) Level 12 1 4.1 a (68.2) 29.5 e (53.0) Level 13 2000 mg 3.9 c (86.2) 10.4 (86.6) 4

AUC(0-24) (μg*h/ml) (CVb%) 1 22 96.1 (229.3) NC 157.6 (44.8) 333.8 (29.4) 275.1 d (202.6) 743.3 b (76.1) 400.0 (55.8) 796.1 g (NC) 291.6 (71.3) 536.2 (98.2) 681.2 (46.4) 860.3 (58.3) AUC(0-12) 22 365.4 NR NR NR NR NR (μg*h/ml) (CVb%) (71.8) Cmax (μg/ml) 1 6.5 (231.8) 11.2 (54.6) 19.4 d (176.0) 36.1 (70.9) 20.8 (70.2) 44.5 (44.7) 22 36.1 (67.7) 18.2 (25.7) 45.1 d (68.8) 53.2 f (2.2) 32.7 (95.5) 52.7 (60.3) t1/2 (h) 1 41.6 g 52.3 31.1 28.6 35.4 f 20.3 f tmax (h) j 1 3.0 3.0 3.5 d 2.0 3.0 4.0 22 3.1 6.0 2.0 d 4.5 f 2.0 3.0 1 3.4 4.7 9.4 d 12.2 8.2 18.8 C24 (μg/ml) (264.1) (CVb%) 22 28.1 (54.9) (38.2) (240.0) (63.6) (79.8) (54.8) 11.0 24.0 d 28.8 f 16.6 28.0 (23.5 (67.4) (37.8) (99.9) (53.5) NOTE: There were patients per cohort unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations: t1/2, elimination half-life; tmax, time to maximum observed plasma cntration; NC, not calculated; NR, not reported. a. n = 6 b. n = 8 c. n = 4 d. n = 10 e. n = 5 f. n = 2 g. n = 1 h. n = 9 i. N=7 j. Median tmax Biomarkers and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Marker Results: Transient increases in plasma VEGF levels were observed during treatment, but no consistent changes from baseline in VCAM-1, E-selectin, Factor VIII VWF, d-dimer, or thrombin cntrations were observed. Dynamic contrast magnetic resonance imaging data obtained in subjects from the dose-escalation cohorts could not be analyzed. Data from the expanded cohorts obtained following an amendment to the protocol were of good quality and were analyzed. Ten of 11 subjects in the 800 mg and 300- BID cohorts for whom data were available had at least 50% reduction in tumor blood flow after treatment with pazopanib as determined by the initial area under the gadolinium cntration versus time curve at 60 seconds (IAUGC60). No consistent treatment related changes in vascular scores or p-vegfr2 were seen in the wound angiogenesis model performed in this study. Hair depigmentation was a PD marker observed at total doses of 600 mg and above. PK/PD Relationships: A logistic regression model was fit to the steady-state trough plasma pazopanib cntrations versus the blood pressure data to determine the probability of developing a significant increase in blood pressure at a given trough pazopanib cntration. The steady-state trough plasma pazopanib cntration at which there was a 50% probability of a significant increase in blood pressure was approximately 15,000 ng/ml (34 μm). Safety Results: An on therapy AE was defined as an AE with onset on or after the start date of study medication but not later than one day after the last date of study medication. Adverse Events occurring in more than one subject in any treatment group, Number of Subjects with AEs, n ( Levels 1 through 7): Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 200 mg Level 6 300 mg N 7 9 2 3 3 6 4 Level 7 5

No. subjects with any AEs n 6 (86) 9 (100) 2 (100) 3 (100) 3 (100) 6 (100) 4 (100) Nausea 2 (29) 5 (56) 0 1 (33) 2 (67) 2 (33) 1 (25) Diarrhea 2 (29) 4 (44) 1 (50) 1 (33) 1 (33) 3 (50) 3 (75) Anorexia 3 (43) 4 (44) 0 2 (67) 0 2 (33) 2 (50) Hypertension 1 (14) 0 1 (50) 0 2 (67) 0 2 (50) Fatigue 1 (14) 4 (44) 1 (50) 0 0 2 (33) 1 (25) Hair depigmentation/hair color 0 1 (11) 0 0 1 (33) 4 (67) 0 changes Vomiting 2 (29) 3 (33) 0 0 2 (67) 2 (33) 1 (25) Constipation 2 (29) 1 (11) 0 0 1 (33) 2 (33) 0 Abdominal pain 1 (14) 0 0 2 (67) 0 2 (33) 0 Headache 0 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 1 (25) Dizziness 2 (29) 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 1 (25) Cough 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 1 (25) Dysgeusia 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Peripheral oedema 0 0 1 (50) 0 0 1 (17) 0 Rash 0 1 (11) 0 0 0 2 (33) 0 Dyspnea 0 3 (33) 0 1 (33) 0 1 (17) 1 (25) Muscle spasms 1 (14) 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Insomnia 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (50) Urinary tract infection 0 2 (22) 0 0 0 0 0 Alopecia 0 1 (11) 0 0 0 2 (33) 0 Musculoskeletal pain 0 2 (22) 0 0 0 2 (33) 0 Pain in extremity 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Paresthesia 2 (29) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pyrexia 1 (14) 2 (22) 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 Vision blurred 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Chills 0 0 0 0 1 (33) 1 (17) 0 Depression 0 0 0 2 (67) 0 1 (17) 0 Skin depigmentation 0 1 (11) 0 0 0 0 0 Skin hypopigmentation 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Abdominal distension 1 (14) 0 1 (50) 0 0 0 0 Flatulence 1 (14) 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) Proteinuria 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) Visual disturbance 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) Asthenia 0 1 (11) 0 0 0 0 0 Postnasal drip 1 (14) 2 (22) 0 0 0 0 0 Bone pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Neutropenia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adverse Events occurring in Total more than one subject in any treatment group, Number of Subjects with AEs, n ( Levels 8 through 13): Level 8 Level 9 600 mg Level 10 800 mg Level 11 1000 mg Level 12 1 Level 13 2000 mg N 3 3 14 3 3 3 63 No. subjects with any AEs n 3 (100) 3 (100) 13 (93) 3 (100) 3 (100) 3 (100) 61 (97) 6

Nausea 2 (67) 2 (67) 7 (50) 2 (67) 2 (67) 2 (67) 30 (48) Diarrhea 1 (33) 2 (67) 6 (43) 2 (67) 1 (33) 1 (33) 28 (44) Anorexia 3 (100) 0 4 (29) 1 (33) 1 (33) 2 (67) 24 (38) Hypertension 2 (67) 1 (33) 6 (43) 3 (100) 2 (67) 2 (67) 22 (35) Fatigue 1 (33) 2 (67) 5 (36) 0 1 (33) 3 (100) 21 (33) Hair depigmentation/hair color 0 3 (100) 7 (50) 2 (67) 1 (33) 2 (67) 21 (33) changes Vomiting 1 (33) 0 4 (29) 1 (33) 1 (33) 1 (33) 19 (30) Constipation 0 1 (33) 4 (29) 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 13 (21) Abdominal pain 0 1 (33) 3 (21) 2 (67) 0 1 (33) 12 (19) Headache 1 (33) 2 (67) 5 (36) 1 (33) 1 (33) 12 (19) Dizziness 0 1 (33) 3 (21) 0 1 (33) 1 (33) 11 (17) Cough 0 1 (33) 2 (14) 2 (67) 1 (33) 0 9 (14) Dysgeusia 0 0 3 (21) 1 (33) 1 (33) 2 (67) 9 (14) Peripheral oedema 1 (33) 1 (33) 3 (21) 0 1 (33) 1 (33) 9 (14) Rash 0 1 (33) 3 (21) 0 1 (33) 1 (33) 9 (14) Dyspnea 0 1 (33) 1 (7) 0 0 0 8 (13) Muscle spasms 0 1 (33) 3 (21) 0 1 (33) 1 (33) 8 (13) Insomnia 0 1 (33) 3 (21) 0 0 0 7 (11) Urinary tract infection 0 0 3 (21) 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 7 (11) Alopecia 0 1 (33) 1 (7) 0 1 (33) 0 6 (10) Musculoskeletal pain 0 0 1 (7) 0 0 1 (33) 6 (10) Pain in extremity 0 0 3 (21) 0 1 (33) 6 (10) Paresthesia 0 0 0 0 0 6 (10) Pyrexia 0 0 2 (14) 0 0 6 (10) Vision blurred 2 (67) 0 0 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 6 (10) Chills 0 1 (33) 2 (14) 0 0 5 (8) Depression 0 0 1 (7) 0 0 1 (33) 5 (8) Skin depigmentation 0 0 3 (21) 0 0 1 (33) 5 (8) Skin hypopigmentation 1 (33) 0 1 (7) 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 5 (8) Abdominal distension 0 0 2 (14) 0 0 4 (6) Flatulence 0 0 2 (14) 0 0 4 (6) Proteinuria 0 0 2 (14) 1 (33) 0 4 (6) Visual disturbance 0 0 2 (14) 0 1 (33) 4 (6) Asthenia 0 0 2 (14) 0 0 3 (5) Postnasal drip 0 0 0 0 0 3 (5) Bone pain 0 0 2 (14)0 0 0 2 (3) Neutropenia 0 0 2 (14) 0 0 2 (3) Serious Adverse Events, n [n considered by the investigator to be related, possibly related, or probably related to study medication]: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 200 mg Level 6 300 mg Level 7 N 7 9 2 3 3 6 4 Subjects with any SAEs, n 2 (29) 3 (33) 0 1 (33) 2 (67) 1 (17) 1 (25) Subjects with any fatal SAEs, n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subjects with any non-fatal 2 (29) 3 (33) 0 1 (33) 2 (67) 1 (17) 1 (25) SAEs, n Cellulitis 0 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 Pneumonia 0 1 (11) 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 Bone pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

Bradycardia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Deep vein thrombosis 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) [1] 0 Electrocardiogram change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Extrapyramidal disorder 0 1 (11) [1] 0 0 0 0 0 Hypertension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Impaired gastric emptying 1 (14) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Intestinal obstruction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nausea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pain 1 (14) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pelvic venous thrombosis 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) [1] 0 Pneumonia klebsiella 0 0 0 0 0 1 (17) 0 Post-operative ileus 0 1 (11) 0 0 0 0 0 Pulmonary embolism 0 0 0 1 (33) [1] 0 0 0 Pyrexia 0 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 Spinal cord compression 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) Tumor hemorrhage 0 1 (11) [1] 0 0 0 0 0 Level 8 Level 9 600 mg Level 10 800 mg Level 11 1000 mg Level 12 1 Level 13 2000 mg N 3 3 14 3 3 3 63 Subjects with any SAEs, n 0 0 3 (21) 1 (33) 1 (33) 0 15 (24) Subjects with any fatal SAEs, n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subjects with any non-fatal 0 0 3 (21) 1 (33) 1 (33) 0 15 (24) SAEs, n Cellulitis 0 0 1 (7) 0 0 0 2 (3) Pneumonia 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (3) Bone pain 0 0 1 (7) 0 0 0 1 (2) Bradycardia 0 0 0 1 (33) 0 0 1 (2) [1] Deep vein thrombosis 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) [1] Electrocardiogram change 0 0 0 1 (33) [1] 0 0 1 (2) [1] Extrapyramidal disorder 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) [1] Hypertension 0 0 0 1 (33) [1] 0 0 1 (2) [1] Impaired gastric emptying 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Intestinal obstruction 0 0 1 (7) 0 0 0 1 (2) Nausea 0 0 0 0 1 (33) [1] 0 1 (2) [1] Pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Pelvic venous thrombosis 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) [1] Pneumonia klebsiella 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Post-operative ileus 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Pulmonary embolism 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) [1] Pyrexia 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Spinal cord compression 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) Tumor hemorrhage 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (2) [1] Number of Subjects with -Limiting Toxicities a n : Level 2 Level 10 800 mg N 9 14 3 No. subjects with DLTs n 2 (22) 1 (7) b 1 (33) Total Level 13 2000 mg 8

Extrapyramidal disorder 1 0 0 Gastrointestinal bleed/ Tumor bleed 1 0 0 Hypertension 0 1 0 Proteinuria 0 1 0 Fatigue 0 0 1 a. All DLTs were Toxicity Grade 3. b. One subject experienced two DLTs. Maximum tolerated dose: An MTD was not determined in this study, although the final cohort was not fully evaluated because of the steady-state exposure to pazopanib appeared to plateau at doses of 800 mg to 2000 mg. A dose limiting toxicity of Grade 3 fatigue occurred in the first cycle in one of subjects receiving 2000 mg. A second subject in this dose cohort experienced grade 2 fatigue in cycle 5 and was dose reduced. The 800 mg dose was selected for evaluation in Phase II studies based on: (1) a manageable safety profile with median administration of 10 weeks (range 0.7 103.4 weeks); (2) a plateau in exposure at doses 800 mg ; (3) attaining a target trough cntration of 15,000 ng/ml based on PD markers (hypertension and clinical activity) that was similar to trough cntrations from preclinical data ( 20,000 ng/ml); and (4) 93% of subjects receiving this dose achieved the target trough cntration. 9