Similar documents
Preliminary Examination in Dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

on the figure. Someone has suggested that, in terms of the degrees of freedom x1 and M. Note that if you think the given 1.2

CHAPTER 3 VIBRATION THEORY. Single Degree of Freedom Systems (SDOF) Stiffness, k Member Stiffness (Member Rigidity).

Codal Provisions IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Structural Dynamics Lecture 4. Outline of Lecture 4. Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems. Formulation of Equations of Motions. Undamped Eigenvibrations.

Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance

Chapter a. Spring constant, k : The change in the force per unit length change of the spring. b. Coefficient of subgrade reaction, k:

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Computational and Applied Sciences (IJETCAS)

Chapter 2: Rigid Bar Supported by Two Buckled Struts under Axial, Harmonic, Displacement Excitation..14

Introduction to structural dynamics

RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF PEAK FLOOR ACCELERATION DEMAND

Response Analysis for Multi Support Earthquake Excitation

Effects of Damping Ratio of Restoring force Device on Response of a Structure Resting on Sliding Supports with Restoring Force Device

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

Dynamics of structures

Dr.Vinod Hosur, Professor, Civil Engg.Dept., Gogte Institute of Technology, Belgaum

TOPIC E: OSCILLATIONS EXAMPLES SPRING Q1. Find general solutions for the following differential equations:

Software Verification

CE 6701 Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao

Introduction to Mechanical Vibration

T1 T e c h n i c a l S e c t i o n

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS BASICS:

Static & Dynamic. Analysis of Structures. Edward L.Wilson. University of California, Berkeley. Fourth Edition. Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

Modal analysis of shear buildings

M.S Comprehensive Examination Analysis

2.003 Engineering Dynamics Problem Set 10 with answer to the concept questions

Section 3.7: Mechanical and Electrical Vibrations

Dynamics of Structures

ME 563 HOMEWORK # 7 SOLUTIONS Fall 2010

FORMULA FOR FORCED VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES USING STATIC FACTORED RESPONSE AS EQUIVALENT DYNAMIC RESPONSE

TOPIC E: OSCILLATIONS SPRING 2019

MODAL ANALYSIS OF PLANE FRAMES

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

18. FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. The Dynamic Analysis of a Structure with a Small Number of Nonlinear Elements is Almost as Fast as a Linear Analysis

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Software Verification

INELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION

Software Verification

EQUIVALENT SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM AND FREE VIBRATION

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination Analysis

Vibrations Qualifying Exam Study Material

Stochastic Dynamics of SDOF Systems (cont.).

Response Spectrum Analysis Shock and Seismic. FEMAP & NX Nastran

Reduction in number of dofs

Some Aspects of Structural Dynamics

Mechatronics. MANE 4490 Fall 2002 Assignment # 1

Tuning TMDs to Fix Floors in MDOF Shear Buildings

Seismic Analysis of Structures Prof. T.K. Datta Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination Analysis

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Lecture 8: Flexibility Method. Example

SHAKING TABLE DEMONSTRATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF BASE-ISOLATED BUILDINGS ***** Instructor Manual *****

Chapter 7: Solving Structural Dynamic Problems Using DCALC By Karl Hanson, S.E., P.E.* September 2008

Physics for Scientists and Engineers 4th Edition, 2017

In-Structure Response Spectra Development Using Complex Frequency Analysis Method

11. (7 points: Choose up to 3 answers) What is the tension,!, in the string? a.! = 0.10 N b.! = 0.21 N c.! = 0.29 N d.! = N e.! = 0.

Theory and Practice of Rotor Dynamics Prof. Dr. Rajiv Tiwari Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

Simulating Two-Dimensional Stick-Slip Motion of a Rigid Body using a New Friction Model

Problem 1: Find the Equation of Motion from the static equilibrium position for the following systems: 1) Assumptions

WEEKS 8-9 Dynamics of Machinery

k 21 k 22 k 23 k 24 k 31 k 32 k 33 k 34 k 41 k 42 k 43 k 44

= y(x, t) =A cos (!t + kx)

Q. 1 Q. 5 carry one mark each.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

Dynamic Analysis Using Response Spectrum Seismic Loading

Introduction to Continuous Systems. Continuous Systems. Strings, Torsional Rods and Beams.

DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC ISOLATION TABLE COMPOSED OF AN X-Y TABLE AND WIRE ROPE ISOLATORS

of the four-bar linkage shown in Figure 1 is T 12

Structural Dynamics Lecture 2. Outline of Lecture 2. Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems (cont.)

THEORY OF VIBRATION ISOLATION

The student will experimentally determine the parameters to represent the behavior of a damped oscillatory system of one degree of freedom.

Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) and Response Spectrum

Structural Dynamics. Spring mass system. The spring force is given by and F(t) is the driving force. Start by applying Newton s second law (F=ma).

BI-DIRECTIONAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIDGE STEEL TRUSS PIERS ALLOWING A CONTROLLED ROCKING RESPONSE

Chapter 23: Principles of Passive Vibration Control: Design of absorber

Methods of Analysis. Force or Flexibility Method

LANMARK UNIVERSITY OMU-ARAN, KWARA STATE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING COURSE: MECHANICS OF MACHINE (MCE 322). LECTURER: ENGR.

20k rad/s and 2 10k rad/s,

EMA 545 Final Exam - Prof. M. S. Allen Spring 2011

Physics General Physics. Lecture 24 Oscillating Systems. Fall 2016 Semester Prof. Matthew Jones

Ch 3.7: Mechanical & Electrical Vibrations

THE EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES ON BUILDINGS WITH A FLEXIBLE FIRST STORY 1

Figure 5.16 Compound pendulum: (a) At rest in equilibrium, (b) General position with coordinate θ, Freebody

Chapter 14 Oscillations. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Kinematics, Dynamics, and Vibrations FE Review Session. Dr. David Herrin March 27, 2012

SPECIAL DYNAMIC SOIL- STRUCTURE ANALYSIS PROCEDURES DEMONSTATED FOR TWO TOWER-LIKE STRUCTURES

Dynamic Analysis on Vibration Isolation of Hypersonic Vehicle Internal Systems

Introduction to Vibration. Professor Mike Brennan

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Translational Mechanical Systems

Module 3. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Displacement Method

Control of Earthquake Induced Vibrations in Asymmetric Buildings Using Passive Damping

ASEISMIC DESIGN OF TALL STRUCTURES USING VARIABLE FREQUENCY PENDULUM OSCILLATOR

1859. Forced transverse vibration analysis of a Rayleigh double-beam system with a Pasternak middle layer subjected to compressive axial load

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITED INELASTIC PRIMARY- SECONDARY SYSTEMS

Oscillatory Motion and Wave Motion

Transcription:

University of California at Berkeley Structural Engineering Mechanics & Materials Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Spring 2012 Student name : Doctoral Preliminary Examination in Dynamics Problem 1. A 2-story building with rigid floors has the mass and stiffness matrices M = m 1 0 0 0.5 K = k 2 1 1 1 where k = 24EI/h 3. The first modal frequency and mode shape are h h EI m/2 m EI F(t) ω 1 = 0.765 k m rad/s φ 1 = 1 2 a) Determine the second mode shape φ 2 and corresponding modal frequency ω 2. b) Suppose the building is subjected to a step forcing function F t = F 0 0 t = 0 t < 0 applied at the roof. Assuming the building is undamped and initially at rest, derive an expression for the displacement at the roof level.

Student name: Problem 2. The two adjacent single-story buildings with rigid roofs are subject to an earthquake base motion described by the pseudo-acceleration response spectrum for 5% damping shown below. Given the information provided in the figure, estimate the minimum separation Δ between the two buildings that is required to avoid their pounding. Assume each building has 5% of crtitcal damping. 5m m EI Δ m EI 3m EI m = 500 m3 s 2 Pseudo-acceleration, S a 1g S a = (0.5g)/T T, sec 2

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY SPRING SEMESTER 2011 Name: Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION: DYNAMICS Let s take a look at a reactor building at the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power plant. Problem 1 A two-story frame is used to model the reactor building. Note the distribution of masses (m vs. 8m) that reflect the weight of the spent fuel pool. The building has the following properties: m = 5kip sec2 /in, k = 100kips/in. The reactor containment structure is considered to be rigid at this stage of the analysis. There is a gap sized between the containment structure and the spent fuel pool. A pseudo-acceleration design spectrum given in the figure is derived from the 2011 Great Tohoku earthquake records. 1. Determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the reactor building. 2. Using an appropriate modal combination rule, determine the smallest size of the gap req such that pounding does not occur given the design spectrum. Justify your choice of the modal combination rule. 1

u 1 2k m 2k 1.0 A/g 0.90/T u 2 4m 4m 0.3 6k 6k 0.3 0.9 T(sec) Problem 2 A tsunami wave force is modeled using rectangular pulse function, shown, and two equivalent lateral forces, P at the spent fuel pool level and P/2 at the roof level. 1. Determine the maximum lateral displacement of the reactor building at the spent fuel pool level. 2. Assuming the containment vessel in unaffected by the tsunami wave, determine if the gap size req determined considering earthquake loading (Problem 1) is sufficient to prevent pounding due to tsunami wave loading. Yes or No. P/2 u 1 2k m 2k 0.2 P/(mg) P u 2 4m 4m 6k 6k 1.0 T(sec) Problem 3 The containment vessel and the suppression pool structure is sitting on soil. The structure is modeled using a rigid weight W supported by massless rigid bars. The foundation of the structure is modeled using two symmetrically positioned springs whose axial stiffness is k and a pin support, as shown. The aspect ratio h/b = 1. There are no dampers. Assume deflections are small. Neglect only the rotational inertia of the weight, but account for its translation inertia. 2

1. Determine the natural frequency ω n of this system. Neglect the action of gravity. 2. Compute the value of the weight W cr that would cause the system to buckle. By definition, W cr is the largest possible weight the structure can support in static equilibrium when deflected from its vertical position by a small angle φ. Include the effect of gravity. 3. Determine the natural frequency ω gn of this system. Include the effect of gravity. Show that: ω gn = ω n 1 W W cr rigid bar h W φ h rigid bar k k b 3

University of California, Berkeley Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering Mechanics and Materials Spring Semester 2009 Doctoral Preliminary Examination Dynamics Problem 1 Viscous dampers are often constructed so that the damping force is proportional the velocity raised to a power other than one. Consider a damper where the damping force is given by F D = sgn(v)av 0.5 where sgn(v) is +1 for ν > 0 and is -1 for v < 0, a is an arbitrary positive-valued coefficient, and vis the velocity of the damper. Determine an expression for the equivalent linear viscous damping coefficient c eq for the forces developed by this damper when it is undergoing harmonic excitation with a non-zero displacement amplitude u 0 and frequency ω. Problem 2 Consider the undamped two-degree-of-freedom ELASTIC structure shown below. Each mass block has a mass of 2 k-sec 2 /in and each spring has a stiffness of 315 k/in. The mass on the left (between the two springs) is subjected to a horizontal harmonic forcing excitation equal to F(t) = F 0 sinωt. The frequency of the excitation ω is 12.56 rad/sec. Determine: i) What are the maximum expected displacements of both masses, and ii) What are the expected maximum forces in the two springs? K K 1000k K 1000k

Name: University of California at Berkeley Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics & Materials Spring Semester 2008 Preliminary Examination in Dynamics 1. Consider a simple single degree-of-freedom system shown below. The rigid block with mass m slides on the horizontal surface. The block is attached to a rigid support by a linear elastic spring with stiffness k. Movement of the block is also resisted by friction between the block and the sliding surface. The horizontal force needed to overcome the friction equals F f =μw, where μ is an unknown friction coefficient and W is the weight of the mass block. W equals 100 kips and k equals 50 kips/inch. The mass is moved to the right 4 inches and then released. What friction coefficient is needed so that after one cycle of oscillation, the amplitude of horizontal oscillation is reduced to 2 inches? 2. Consider the two-degree of freedom system shown below. It is subjected to a horizontal earthquake excitation represented by a simplified response spectrum D n =3T, were the spectral displacement D n is measured in inches, and period is specified in seconds. It is desired that the structure be proportioned so that the expected peak horizontal response of the mass on the right is 8 inches. Modal contributions to response can be estimated using SRSS methods. It may be assumed that peak responses in each mode can be represented by the specified spectrum. a. What is the stiffness required of the springs (all equal) to achieve the stipulated peak displacement? b. What is the expected maximum force in the spring located between the two masses?