Supplementary Figures

Similar documents
Supplement of Vegetation greenness and land carbon-flux anomalies associated with climate variations: a focus on the year 2015

Zambia. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Drought Monitoring in Mainland Portugal

UPPLEMENT A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY DROUGHT IN THE UNITED STATES TO THE 1930S AND 1950S DROUGHT EPISODES

St Lucia. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

Lab Activity: Climate Variables

Cuba. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Grenada. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

Second-Order Draft Chapter 10 IPCC WG1 Fourth Assessment Report

3. Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )

Malawi. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1

ANNUAL CLIMATE REPORT 2016 SRI LANKA

Interannual variability of top-ofatmosphere. CERES instruments

Mozambique. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1

Antigua and Barbuda. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature

Nonlinear atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss under different sea ice scenarios

The 2010/11 drought in the Horn of Africa: Monitoring and forecasts using ECMWF products

Modeling the Arctic Climate System

LAB 2: Earth Sun Relations

ENSO and April SAT in MSA. This link is critical for our regression analysis where ENSO and

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 21, 2017

Suriname. General Climate. Recent Climate Trends. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G.

Meteorology. Circle the letter that corresponds to the correct answer

Supplementary figures

Supplementary Figure 1. Summer mesoscale convective systems rainfall climatology and trends. Mesoscale convective system (MCS) (a) mean total

Observed State of the Global Climate

ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by: Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 30 October 2017

Long Term Renewables Forecast Hauser Plads 10, 4 DK-1127 Copenhagen K Denmark

Analysis of real-time prairie drought monitoring and forecasting system. Lei Wen and Charles A. Lin

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events

Constructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem

The Impact of Weather Extreme Events on US Agriculture

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary appendix

ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by: Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 9 November 2015

Drought and Climate Extremes Indices for the North American Drought Monitor and North America Climate Extremes Monitoring System. Richard R. Heim Jr.

Supplement of Upside-down fluxes Down Under: CO 2 net sink in winter and net source in summer in a temperate evergreen broadleaf forest

The Arctic Energy Budget

Supplemental Material for Transient climate impacts for scenarios of aerosol emissions from Asia: a story of coal versus gas

Cape Verde. General Climate. Recent Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Temperature. Precipitation

Tracking the Climate Of Northern Colorado Nolan Doesken State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

How Patterns Far Away Can Influence Our Weather. Mark Shafer University of Oklahoma Norman, OK

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 11 November 2013

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 5 August 2013

List of Exposure and Dose Metrics

PYROGEOGRAPHY OF THE IBERIAN PENINSULA

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 25 February 2013

Regents Earth Science Unit 7: Water Cycle and Climate

No pause in the increase of hot temperature extremes

Anticipated and Observed Trends in the Global Hydrological Cycle. Kevin E. Trenberth NCAR

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 15 July 2013

DROUGHT IN MAINLAND PORTUGAL

Climate Dynamics (PCC 587): Hydrologic Cycle and Global Warming

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis

Assimilation of satellite fapar data within the ORCHIDEE biosphere model and its impacts on land surface carbon and energy fluxes

DROUGHT ASSESSMENT USING SATELLITE DERIVED METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND NDVI IN POTOHAR REGION

Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones: Hong Kong and the Netherlands

APPENDIX M LAKE ELEVATION AND FLOW RELEASES SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS RESULTS

Analysis of Historical Pattern of Rainfall in the Western Region of Bangladesh

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 23 April 2012

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 24 September 2012

NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama

Current Climate Trends and Implications

Earth s Climate Patterns

2018 Science Olympiad: Badger Invitational Meteorology Exam. Team Name: Team Motto:

South & South East Asian Region:

Assessing the impact of Arctic sea ice variability on Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass and energy exchange

Supplemental Materials

Once a specific data set is selected, NEO will list related data sets in the panel titled Matching Datasets, which is to the right of the image.

Human influence on terrestrial precipitation trends revealed by dynamical

Weather and climate outlooks for crop estimates

Global Climates. Name Date

Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target

The Northern Hemisphere Sea ice Trends: Regional Features and the Late 1990s Change. Renguang Wu

The Palfai Drought Index (PaDI) Expansion of applicability of Hungarian PAI for South East Europe (SEE) region Summary

Lecture Topics. 1. Vegetation Indices 2. Global NDVI data sets 3. Analysis of temporal NDVI trends

Seasonal prediction of extreme events

AQRP Monthly Technical Report

APPENDIX A LAKE EVAPORATION

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

OVERVIEW OF IMPROVED USE OF RS INDICATORS AT INAM. Domingos Mosquito Patricio

Christopher L. Castro Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Arizona

WATER VAPOR FLUXES OVER EQUATORIAL CENTRAL AFRICA

Climate Change Impact Assessment on Indian Water Resources. Ashvin Gosain, Sandhya Rao, Debajit Basu Ray

SES 123 Global and Regional Energy Lab Worksheet

Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands

BIOGEOGRAPHY GEO 4300/5107C. The Environmental Setting (Geographic Template) Lecture 3: 8 January 2015

particular regional weather extremes

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(4): Sujitha E and Shanmugasundaram K

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 16, 2019

South & South East Asian Region:

P7: Limiting Factors in Ecosystems

The effect of ocean mixed layer depth on climate in slab ocean aquaplanet ABSTRACT

Study of Changes in Climate Parameters at Regional Level: Indian Scenarios

Climate Models and Snow: Projections and Predictions, Decades to Days

ATMOS 5140 Lecture 1 Chapter 1

Supplement of Carbon stocks and fluxes in the high latitudes: using site-level data to evaluate Earth system models

Transcription:

Supplementary Figures Supplementary Figure 1: The partial correlation coefficient of NDVI GS and GT for the first 15 years (1982-1996) and the last 15 years (1997-211) with five different definition of growing season. (a) All variables are not detrended, (b) annual precipitation (the sum of monthly precipitation stretching from previous November to current October) is used as a surrogate for growing season precipitation and (c) GIMMS leaf area index (LAI) is used instead of NDVI data. 1

a b Detrended NDVI GS anomaly.2.1 -.1 -.2 198s 199s 2s y =.69x, R =.27, P =.144 -.8 -.6 -.4 -.2.2.4.6.8 Detrended GT anomaly ( C) Detrended NDVI GS anomaly.2.1 -.1 -.2 y = -.x, R = -.3, P =.886-2 -15-1 -5 5 1 15 2 25 Detrended GP anomaly (mm) c Correlation Coefficient.9.6.3 -.3 R NDVI-GT R NDVI-GP Partial correlation Coefficient.8.6.4.2 d 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 21 23 Year April-October May-September First 15 years May-October Last 15 years 25% amplitude 5% amplitude A B C D E Supplementary Figure 2: The linkage between spatially averaged growing season NDVI (NDVI GS ) and climate over the latitude band (3 N-6 N) during 1982-211. Relationship of detrended anomalies of NDVI GS with (a) growing season temperature (GT), and (b) growing season precipitation (GP) for the whole study period of 1982-211. The lines in (a) and (b) represent the linear regressions of NDVI GS versus GT (a) and GP (b). The dots in different color represent observation for the period of 198s (1982-1989), 199s (1991-1999) and 2s (2-211), respectively. (c) Changes in the correlation coefficient between NDVI GS and GT, and between NDVI GS and GP after applying 15-year moving windows (all variables detrended for each corresponding window). The x-axis is the central year of the 15-year moving window (e.g. 199 stands for a moving window from 1983-1997). For (a), (b), and (c), growing season is defined as April to October. (d) The partial correlation coefficient of NDVI GS and GT for the first 15 years (1982-1996) and the last 15 years (1997-211) with five different definition of growing season. Growing season is defined as April to October, May to September, May to October, months with NDVI exceeding 25% of its seasonal amplitude and months with NDVI exceeding 5% of its amplitude, respectively. indicates a significant correlation at P <.5. 2

a b Detrended NDVI GS anomaly.2.1 -.1 -.2 198s 199s 2s y =.112x, R =.75, P <.1 -.8 -.6 -.4 -.2.2.4.6.8 Detrended GT anomaly ( C) Detrended NDVI GS anomaly.2.1 -.1 -.2 y =.2x, R =.31, P =.92-2 -15-1 -5 5 1 15 2 25 Detrended GP anomaly (mm) c Correlation Coefficient.9.6.3 -.3 R NDVI-GT R NDVI-GP Partial correlation Coefficient.8.6.4.2 d 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 21 23 Year April-October May-September First 15 years May-October 25% amplitude 5% amplitude A B C D E Last 15 years Supplementary Figure 3: The linkage between spatially averaged growing season NDVI (NDVI GS ) and climate over the latitude band above 6 N during 1982-211. Relationship of detrended anomalies of NDVI GS with (a) growing season temperature (GT), and (b) growing season precipitation (GP) for the whole study period of 1982-211. The lines in (a) and (b) represent the linear regressions of NDVI GS versus GT (a) and GP (b). The dots in different color represent observation for the period of 198s (1982-1989), 199s (1991-1999) and 2s (2-211), respectively. (c) Changes in the correlation coefficient between NDVI GS and GT, and between NDVI GS and GP after applying 15-year moving windows (all variables detrended for each corresponding window). The x-axis is the central year of the 15-year moving window (e.g. 199 stands for a moving window from 1983-1997). For (a), (b), and (c), growing season is defined as April to October. (d) The partial correlation coefficient of NDVI GS and GT for the first 15 years (1982-1996) and the last 15 years (1997-211) with five different definition of growing season. Growing season is defined as April to October, May to September, May to October, months with NDVI exceeding 25% of its seasonal amplitude and months with NDVI exceeding 5% of its amplitude, respectively. indicates a significant correlation at P <.5. 3

Supplementary Figure 4: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R) of vegetation productivity and precipitation, and the trend of R over the Northern Hemisphere. (a) partial correlation coefficient (R NDVI-GP ) between growing season NDVI (NDVI GS ) and growing season precipitation (GP); (b) partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GP ) between 1 models estimated average of growing season net primary productivity (NPP GS ) and GP. Growing season is defined as April to October. The horizontal axis of the color legend is calculated for the entire study period, and R = ±.38 corresponds to the.5 significance levels for the entire study period. 15-year moving windows are used to estimate the trend of R (the vertical axis of the color legend). All variables are detrended for the corresponding period. To calculate its partial correlation versus GP, growing season temperature and cloud cover are controlled for. The dots indicates the regions with significant trend in R NDVI-GP (or R NPP-GP ) (P<.5). 4

May-Sep May-Oct 25% Amplitude 5% Amplitude Supplementary Figure 5: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R) of NDVI and climate, and the trend of R over the Northern Hemisphere. (a), (c), (e), and (g) partial correlation coefficient (R NDVI-GT ) between NDVI (NDVI GS ) and temperature (GT) for May-September, May-October, the continuous months with NDVI exceeding 25% of its seasonal amplitude, and months with NDVI exceeding 5% of its amplitude, respectively. (b), (d), (f), and (h) partial correlation coefficient (R NDVI-GP ) between NDVI (NDVI GS ) and precipitation (GP) for May-September, May-October, the continuous months with NDVI exceeding 25% of its seasonal amplitude, and months with NDVI exceeding 5% of its amplitude, respectively. The dots indicates the regions with significant trend in R NDVI-GT (or R NDVI-GP ) (P<.5). 5

Supplementary Figure 6: Spatial distribution of correlation coefficient between growing season precipitation (GP) and shortwave solar radiation (SR). Two different SR datasets are used: (a) CRUNECP (http://nacp.ornl.gov/thredds/fileserver/reccapdriver/cru_ncep/analysis/readme.htm) and (b) SRB (http://gewex-srb.larc.nasa.gov/common/php/srb_data_products.php). All variables are detrended for the corresponding period of data availability (1982-211 for a and 1984-27 for b, respectively). Growing season is defined as April to October. In panel (a), R = ±.46, R = ±.36, R = ±.31 and R = ±.24 correspond to the.1,.5,.1 and.2 significance levels, respectively. In panel (b), R = ±.52, R = ±.4, R = ±.34 and R = ±.27 correspond to the.1,.5,.1 and.2 significance levels, respectively. 6

Supplementary Figure 7: Spatial pattern of partial correlation coefficient between growing season NDVI (NDVI GS ) and shortwave solar radiation (SR) when statistically controlling for growing season temperature and precipitation. Two different SR datasets are used: (a) CRUNECP (http://nacp.ornl.gov/thredds/fileserver/reccapdriver/cru_ncep/analysis/readme.htm) and (b) SRB (http://gewex-srb.larc.nasa.gov/common/php/srb_data_products.php). All variables are detrended for the corresponding period of data availability (1982-211 for a and 1984-27 for b, respectively). Growing season is defined as April to October. In panel (a), R = ±.48, R = ±.37, R = ±.32 and R = ±.25 correspond to the.1,.5,.1 and.2 significance levels, respectively. In panel (b), R = ±.54, R = ±.42, R = ±.36 and R = ±.28 correspond to the.1,.5,.1 and.2 significance levels, respectively. 7

Supplementary Figure 8: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R) of vegetation productivity and climate, and the trend of R over the Northern Hemisphere. (a) partial correlation coefficient (R GPP-GT ) between 1 models estimated average of growing season gross primary productivity (GPP GS ) and growing season temperature (GT); (b) partial correlation coefficient (R GPP-GP ) between 1 models estimated average of GPP GS and growing season precipitation (GP); (c) partial correlation coefficient (R LAI-GT ) between 1 models estimated average of growing season gross LAI (LAY GS ) and GT; (d) partial correlation coefficient (R LAI-GP ) between 1 models estimated average of LAI GS and GP. Growing season is defined as April to October. All variables are detrended for the corresponding period. The dots indicates the regions with significant trend in R (P<.5). 8

Supplementary Figure 9: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GT ) of growing season net primary productivity (NPP) and growing season temperature (GT), and the trend of R NPP-GT over the Northern Hemisphere. Growing season is defined as April to October. All variables are detrended for the corresponding period. The dots indicates the regions with significant trend in R NPP-GT (P<.5). 9

Supplementary Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GT ) of growing season net primary productivity (NPP) and growing season precipitation (GP), and the trend of R NPP-GP over the Northern Hemisphere. Growing season is defined as April to October. All variables are detrended for the corresponding period. The dots indicates the regions with significant trend in R NPP-GP (P<.5). 1

Supplementary Figure 11: Percentage of vegetated land with (a-b) the partial correlation coefficient (R) and (c-d) its trend, shown in Figure 2, exceeding the chosen threshold. (a and c) R between growing season NDVI (NDVI GS ) or model estimated growing season net primary production (NPP GS ) and growing season temperature (GT); (b and d) R between NDVI GS / NPP GS and growing season precipitation (GP). The blue area represents the range of the model estimation; the blue line represents the median of it. 11

First 15 years Last 15 years Partial correlation Coefficient.9.6.3 -.3 -.6 Av erage CLM4C CLM4CN HYLAND LPJ LPJ_GUESS OCN ORCHIDEE SDGVM JULES VEGAS Supplementary Figure 12: The partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GT ) between spatially averaged growing season net primary productivity (NPP GS ) and temperature (GT) for the first 15 years (1982-1996) and the last 15 years (1997-21) over north of 3 o N. Growing season is defined as April-October. 12

Supplementary Figure 13: Spatial distribution of the difference in the growing season Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) between 1997-21 and 1982-1996 over the Northern Hemisphere (North of 3 N) (negative values indicate drier condition). Because PDSI data were not available for the year of 211, we used the mean value of 1997-21 as that of the last moving window (1997-211) in the NDVI correlation analysis. The dot indicates the regions with statistically significant difference (P<.5). 13

Supplementary Figure 14: Spatial distributions of the relative difference in model simulated growing season soil moisture between 1996-21 and 1982-1996 (negative values indicate decrease in moisture). The dot indicates the regions with statistically significant difference (P<.5). 14

Supplementary Figure 15: Spatial distributions of trend in number of growing season (April to October) hot extreme days from 1982 to 211. The hot extreme days are defined as the 9 th percentile warm day frequency (Tx9p, i.e. the number of days above the 9 th percentile) based on whole study period of 1982-211. The dot indicates the regions with significant trend in Tx9p (P<.5). 15

Supplementary Figure 16: Spatial distribution of the correlation coefficient between the partial correlation coefficient from Figure 2 and corresponding local climate after applying a moving 5 o by 5 o spatial window. (a) The correlation coefficient between R NDVI-GT and GP; (b) The correlation coefficient between R NDVI-GP and GT; (c) The correlation coefficient between R NPP-GT and GP; (d) The correlation coefficient between and R NPP-GP and GT. Growing season is defined as April to October. For a and b, R = ±.32, R = ±.26,R = ±.2 and R = ±.17 correspond to the.1,.1,.5 and.1 significance levels, respectively. For c and d, R = ±.62, R = ±.51,R = ±.4 and R = ±.34 correspond to the.1,.1,.5 and.1 significance levels, respectively. 16

Supplementary Figure 17: Spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficient (R) of growing season net primary productivity (NPP GS ) and climate, and the trend of R over the Northern Hemisphere. (a) partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GT ) between 1 models estimated average of growing season net primary productivity (NPP GS ) and growing season temperature (GT); (b) partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GP ) between 1 models estimated average of NPP GS and growing season precipitation (GP). NPP GS computed by subtracting NPP GS of S1 scenario (simulation driven by historical change in atmospheric CO 2 concentration) from NPP GS of S2 scenario (simulation driven by historical change in climate and atmospheric CO 2 concentration). The dot indicates the regions with statistically significant difference (P<.5). 17

R NPP-GT R NPP-GT R NPP-GT a b c.9.6.3 -.3 -.6 -.9 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 2 Year.9.6.3 -.3 -.6 -.9 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 2 Year.9.6.3 -.3 -.6 CLM4C CLM4CN HYLAND LPJ LPJ_GUESS OCN ORCHIDEE SDGVM JULES VEGAS Average -.9 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 2 Year Supplementary Figure 18: Partial correlation coefficient (R NPP-GT ) between Trendy models estimated growing season net primary productivity (NPP GS ) and growing season temperature (GT) over (a) 3 N-9 N, (b) 3 N-6 N and (c) 6 N-9 N regions for each 15-year moving window during the period 191-21. All variables are detrended for each moving window with a linear fit. The horizontal dash line indicates R =.55 corresponding to a.5 significance level for a 15-year moving window assuming independent yearly data. 18