Project Budget: State Wildlife Grant Requested: $16,412 Project Match (UARK in kind services): $5,744 Total Project Cost: $22,156

Similar documents
Title: Status, Distribution, and Genetics of Three Arkansas Crayfish: Cambarus causeyi, Procambarus parasimulans, and Orconectes meeki brevis

Conservation genetics of the Ozark pocket gopher

Title of the Project: Distribution and population status of Arkansas bumble bees

PROJECT PARTNER: PROJECT PARTNER:

Project Title: Eleven Point River Streambank Erosion Assessment

Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) & Management Units (MUs)

Applications of Genetics to Conservation Biology

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

Project Leader: Project Partners:

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

An Introduction to Day Two. Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning Lakewood, Colorado August 15-16, 16, 2006

Chapter 26: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Phylogenies Show Evolutionary Relationships

Springsnails. An Introduction for Conservation Partners. Jeff Sorensen, AZ Game & Fish Dept. AZ Heritage Fund

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

Ph ylogeography. A guide to the study of the spatial distribution of Seahorses. By Leila Mougoui Bakhtiari

Taxon: generally refers to any named group of organisms, such as species, genus, family, order, etc.. Node: represents the hypothetical ancestor

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

Molecular Genetics for Aquatic and Marine Biodiversity Conservation

Amy Driskell. Laboratories of Analytical Biology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Wash. DC

PLANT BIOLOGY (PBIO) Plant Biology (PBIO) 1

Using Big Interagency Databases to Identify Climate Refugia for Idaho s Species of Concern

Creating an e-flora for South Africa

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Stephen B. Monsen. Dr. Allan R. Stevens. Dr. E. Durant McArthur

Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution

Introduction to Biosystematics - Zool 575

Post-doc fellowships to non-eu researchers FINAL REPORT. Home Institute: Centro de Investigaciones Marinas, Universidad de La Habana, CUBA

Systematics - BIO 615

Phylogenetic diversity and conservation

Biologists use a system of classification to organize information about the diversity of living things.

Proceedings of Association of Pacific Rim Universities (APRU) Research Symposium on University Museums: Forming a University Museum Collection

Wailupe, Oÿahu. Wailupe, Oÿahu WATERSHED FEATURES

Conservation Genetics. Outline

Wailua, Maui WATERSHED FEATURES

Eric D. Stein Biology Department

OMICS Journals are welcoming Submissions

Postgraduate teaching for the next generation of taxonomists

Introduction to Biosystematics. Course Website: Lecture 1: Introduction to Biological Systematics Outline: The role and value of Systematics

Plant Names and Classification

Phylogeny and systematics. Why are these disciplines important in evolutionary biology and how are they related to each other?

The Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative Conservation Goals

Assessing Michigan s Biological diversity. Michigan Natural Features Inventory MSU Extension

Wisconsin s Invasive Species Classification Assessment and Rule

Evolutionary Biology: Achievements and Limits of a Scientific Theory

8/23/2014. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life

Adv. Biology: Classification Unit Study Guide

Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Continued)

Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis & Lindenmayer 2015

Biology 211 (2) Week 1 KEY!

DNA Barcoding: A New Tool for Identifying Biological Specimens and Managing Species Diversity

Press Release BACTERIA'S KEY INNOVATION HELPS UNDERSTAND EVOLUTION

PHYLOGENY & THE TREE OF LIFE

Stockton Unified School District Instructional Guide for BIOLOGY NGSS Pilot for both 4X4 and Traditional. 1st Quarter

PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS

Integrating Fossils into Phylogenies. Throughout the 20th century, the relationship between paleontology and evolutionary biology has been strained.

Outline. Classification of Living Things

DNA Barcoding and taxonomy of Glossina

I L L I N 0 I S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Appendix D ORV Assessment for Clarion River

HS.LS1.B: Growth and Development of Organisms

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Motivation for project:

Species Identification and Barcoding. Brendan Reid Wildlife Conservation Genetics February 9th, 2010

the map Redrawing Donald Hobern takes a look at the challenges of managing biodiversity data [ Feature ]

Zoological Systematics & Taxonomy

UoN, CAS, DBSC BIOL102 lecture notes by: Dr. Mustafa A. Mansi. The Phylogenetic Systematics (Phylogeny and Systematics)

Krešimir Žganec, doc. dr. sc. University of Zadar

The science behind the conservation of endangered species: My experiences with Australian and Japanese bats. Kyle N. Armstrong

Genetic diversity of beech in Greece

Priorities for the development of a European taxonomic information system

Lecture 11 Friday, October 21, 2011

Phylogeography and genetic differentiation between Loxigilla noctis and L. barbadensis in the Lesser Antilles

Phylogenetic Diversity and distribution patterns of the Compositae family in the high Andes of South America

Is Ignoring Evolution Intelligent Design for Conservation? Mark Reynolds, Gretchen LeBuhn, Dick Cameron, and Rebecca Shaw

Habitat Modeling of Three Endemic Crayfish Species in the Black River Drainage of Missouri and Arkansas: Factors Affecting Distribution and Abundance

Phylogenetic analysis. Characters

Bioinformatics. Dept. of Computational Biology & Bioinformatics

Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years. Statement of

TEST SUMMARY AND FRAMEWORK TEST SUMMARY

Middle School. Teacher s Guide MICROPLANTS MAJOR SPONSOR:

NUPP ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY 2018 ARKANSAS STATE WILDLIFE GRANT PRE-PROPOSAL 1

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Project Primary Contact: Gregg Servheen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25 Boise, ID ,

Goal 1: Develop knowledge and understanding of core content in biology

SPECIATION. REPRODUCTIVE BARRIERS PREZYGOTIC: Barriers that prevent fertilization. Habitat isolation Populations can t get together

Session 6 Evolution and the Tree of Life

Preview. 1.What Is A Species? 2.Biodiversity Values

Biological Response to the Gold King Mine Release in the Animas and San Juan Rivers

Taxonomy. Content. How to determine & classify a species. Phylogeny and evolution

Case Study: Ecological Integrity of Grasslands in the Apache Highlands Ecoregion

Organizing Life s Diversity

The Tempo of Macroevolution: Patterns of Diversification and Extinction

EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE Biology Concepts

Chapter 26. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life. Lecture Presentations by Nicole Tunbridge and Kathleen Fitzpatrick Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 19: Taxonomy, Systematics, and Phylogeny

GIS Applications to Museum Specimens

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Genetic Response to Rapid Climate Change

Transcription:

Project Title: Genetic examination of the Ringed Crayfish species group, with special emphasis on the endemic Gapped Ringed Crayfish (Orconectes neglectus chaenodactylus) Project Summary: Morphological and genetic research suggests that the Ringed Crayfish species complex (Orconectes neglectus ssp.) is comprised of multiple taxonomic groups, however additional genetic analyses are needed to further clarify taxonomic status of this species complex and refine conservation priorities in the Arkansas State Wildlife Action Plan. The goal of this study is to further elucidate the taxonomic relationships within the Ringed Crayfish species complex by extending phylogenetic molecular techniques. Our specific objectives are 1) Clarify taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships within the species complex and 2) Identify management units (MUs) and evolutionary significant units (ESUs) within the White River Basin. Results from this work help guide conservation rankings and prioritize efforts to maintain biodiversity within Arkansas including the biological integrity of the Ozark Highlands Ecoregion. Project Leader: Whitney J.B. Anthonysamy, Post Doctoral Fellow, University of Arkansas, Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72701, wjba@uark.edu, 217 343 0603 Project Partners: Brian K. Wagner, Nongame Aquatics Biologist, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 915 E. Sevier Street, Benton, AR 72015, bkwagner@agfc.state.ar.us, 877 847 2690 Marlis R. Douglas, Bruker Professor in Life Sciences, University of Arkansas, Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72701, mrd1@uark.edu, 479 575 4176 Michael E. Douglas, 21 st Century Chair in Global Change Biology, University of Arkansas, Department of Biological Sciences, Fayetteville, AR 72701, med1@uark.edu, 479 575 6343 Project Budget: State Wildlife Grant Requested: $16,412 Project Match (UARK in kind services): $5,744 Total Project Cost: $22,156 Budget Category Year 1 Year 2 Total Postdoc Salary/Benefits (1 mo) $4,710 $4,710 $15,164 Supplies/Sequencing $4000 $4,000 Travel $1,500 $1,500 Indirect Costs (10%) $871 $621 $1,492 Subtotal $9,581 $6,831 $16,412 35% Match (UARK in kind services) $3,354 $2,391 $5,744 Total $9,581 $6,831 $22,156 1

Proposal Statement Need Morphological and genetic research suggests that the Ringed Crayfish species complex (Orconectes neglectus ssp.) is comprised of multiple taxonomic groups (Crandall & Fitzpatrick 1996, Crandall 1998), however level of species status and number of distinct genetic lineages remains unclear (Dillman et al. 2007). Formerly, two subspecies were designated based on morphological characteristics (Williams 1952). Orconectes neglectus neglectus has a widespread distribution throughout the White River Basin and naturally occurs in disjunct populations in other states (Pflieger 1996). In contrast, the Gapped Ringed Crayfish, O. n. chaenodactylus is uncommon in Arkansas, endemic to the Ozarks, and maintains a restricted distribution primarily in the North Fork White River and Sylamore Creek basins (Wagner et al. 2010). In addition, Ringed Crayfish have become established outside of their native range, including the Spring River drainage in Arkansas (Rabalais & Magoulick 2006). Such invasions have been associated with declines in native crayfish species (Magoulick & DiStefano 2007, Imhoff et al. 2012). More recently, genetic work based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data suggested that considerable fine scale geographic variation exists in the Ringed Crayfish species complex within the White River Basin (Dillman et al. 2007). This work indicated that as many as three deeply divergent lineages that correspond to each of the previously described subspecies as well as a third undescribed taxon and the authors argued results warranted elevation of each lineage to species status (Dillman et al. 2007). In addition, each lineage showed further subdivision corresponding to historical connectivity and isolation among tributaries in the basin (Dillman et al. 2007). Additional genetic analyses are needed to further clarify taxonomic status of this species complex, identify potential cryptic species, and improve efforts to develop conservation rankings and refine goals of the Arkansas State Wildlife Action Plan. Priority actions addressed 1. Gapped Ringed Crayfish (Orconectes neglectus chaenodactylus) additional genetic examination of this subspecies and other O. neglectus forms to identify cryptic species and develop appropriate conservation targets. 2. Newly Described Species Several new species have recently been described in the state. Determining distribution and population status is necessary to determine their need to be added to the AWAP as SGNC. Purpose and Objectives The goal of this study is to further elucidate the taxonomic relationships within the Ringed Crayfish species complex. Here, we build on existing genetic research and test taxonomic hypotheses derived from previous sequence data by examining additional genetic markers to identify congruent patterns that confirm lineages. Such data are needed to support taxonomic reclassification, recognition of distinct species and identification of diversity and population structure within each species. Our specific objectives are: 1. Genotype ~100 samples from the White River Basin to clarify taxonomic status and phylogenetic relationships within the Orconectes neglectus species complex. 2. Identify management units (MUs) and evolutionary significant units (ESUs) within the North Fork White and Middle White River Basins. 2

Location This project will be conducted at the Arkansas Conservation and Molecular Ecology Laboratory (acamel) located at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, and will target specimens collected from the North Fork White River and Middle White River basins in the Ozark Highlands Ecoregion (Fig 1). Figure 1: Map study area. Black triangles depict known locations for the Gapped Ringed Crayfish, O. n. chaenodactylus. Modified from Wagner et al. 2010 Approach DNA Extraction Material for genetic analysis will be obtained from approximately 100 tissue samples (e.g., gill, tail muscle) either from voucher specimens stored at the AGFC Nongame Aquatics Program reference collection or from live specimens collected by BKW. Sampling procedures and locations will follow Wagner et al. (2010). Whole genomic DNA will be extracted using a modified DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN Inc.) protocol. DNA Sequencing We will analyze three distinct genes (markers) to confirm consistent patterns of genetic distinct entities within and among recognized subspecies. We will sequence two mitochondrial DNA genes (16S and COI) and one nuclear gene (GAPDH) following the methods of Dillman et al. (2007) and Mathews et al. (2008). Analyzing the same genes as used in previous studies will allow us to directly compare our data to existing results (available from public databases such as GenBank). Briefly, we will amplify and sequence each gene for each sample using dideoxy terminator chemistry (Sanger sequencing) and analyze nucleotide sequences on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 3730). We then will manually align sequences using SEQUENCHER (Gene Codes). 3

Data Analyses We will analyze genetic data at two levels: first we will identify genetic lineages corresponding to distinct species and then examine population substructure within each species. Distinct lineages will be identified using standard phylogenetic (clustering) approaches including Bayesian and maximumlikelihood methods implemented in the programs MrBayes 3.2 and MEGA 5. We then will characterize genetic diversity within among distinct lineages by estimating standard phylogeographic and population genetic parameters such as percent sequence divergences, number of haplotypes and nucleotide diversities using DNASP v.5. To visualize geographic distributions of unique genetic lineages within and among taxonomic groups a haplotype network (tree) will be constructed. This project is anticipated to take two years. Sampling, DNA extraction, and DNA sequencing will be completed during the first year. Analyses and writing (final report, manuscripts) will be completed during the second year. Expected Results and Benefits This work would clarify taxonomic relationships (i.e., new species) within the Ringed Crayfish species complex and facilitate identification management units (MUs) and evolutionary significant units (ESUs). This valuable information would help guide conservation rankings and prioritize efforts to maintain biodiversity within Arkansas including the biological integrity of the Ozark Highlands Ecoregion. In addition, the PIs are currently exploring other funding sources to investigate the development of genomic tools that can be applied to assess population level questions. This approach provides increased genetic resolution compared to more traditional genetic markers (mtdna) and could also be used to track the invasion ecology (sources and routes of invasion) of O. neglectus spp. Results will be summarized in a final report submitted to the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and will also be disseminated in presentations at local, regional and national professional meetings and submitted for publication to peer reviewed journals. Budget State Wildlife Grant Requested: $16,412 Project Match (UARK in kind services): $5,744 Total Project Cost: $22,156 Budget Category Year 1 Year 2 Total Postdoc Salary/Benefits (1 mo) $4,710 $4,710 $15,164 Supplies/Sequencing $4000 $4,000 Travel $1,500 $1,500 Indirect Costs (10%) $871 $621 $1,492 Subtotal $9,581 $6,831 $16,412 35% Match (UARK in kind services) $3,354 $2,391 $5,744 Total $9,581 $6,831 $22,156 4

Qualifications Dr. Whitney J. B. Anthonysamy (Project Lead) is a Post Doctoral Fellow in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. She obtained her Ph.D. in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois in 2012 and spent three years as a postdoctoral Research Associate at the Illinois Natural History Survey prior to her current position at UARK. Dr. Anthonysamy uses field and genetic techniques to understand how species adapt and persist in anthropogenically disturbed landscapes and has worked extensively with aquatic species including reptiles, non game fish, macro invertebrates, and invasive plants. Mr. Brian K. Wagner (Project Partner) is the Interim Assistant Chief/Nongame Aquatics Biologist at the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. He has over 15 years of research experience in aquatic conservation and received his M.S. in Fisheries from Virginia Tech in 1991. Mr. Wagner is a certified Fisheries Scientist through American Fisheries Society and leads the Arkansas Wildlife Action Plan Crayfish Taxa Team, and is active on the Fish, Cave, and Invertebrate Taxa Teams. Dr. Marlis R. Douglas (Project Partner) is the Bruker Professor in Life Sciences in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Dr. Douglas established and is codirecting the Arkansas Conservation and Molecular Ecology Laboratory (acamel) UARK in BISC and has over 20 years of experience in conservation genetics research involving rare, threatened or endangered, as well as invasive, aquatic species. Prior she held faculty positions and co directed CaMEL laboratories at Colorado State University in the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology and at the Illinois Natural History at the University of Illinois. She has a long history working closely with state and federal agencies, as well as NGOs and tribal groups, to address information needs and generate scientifically sound data that inform management and help refine conservation efforts. She also serves as liaison between the American Fisheries Society and the American Society for Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, the two primary scientific societies focusing on fish and fisheries. Dr. Michael E. Douglas (Project Partner) is the 21 st Century Chair in Global Change Biology in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Dr. Douglas is co director of acamel and held previous faculty positions at Oklahoma State (Biology), Arizona State University (Life Sciences), and Colorado State University (Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology), and was Director of the Division of Ecology and Conservation Science and Associate Director for Research at the Illinois Natural History Survey at the University of Illinois. He has over 30 years experience in conducting conservation and ecology oriented research in a wide variety of disciplines including taxonomy, phylogenetics, quantitative ecology, morphometerics, statistical analyses, primarily involving aquatic organisms, as well as wildlife species. He served as president of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists and the Desert Fishes Council, and was for 15 years editor of the journal Copeia. 5