The Effects of Weather on Urban Trail Use: A National Study

Similar documents
GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Global Climates. Name Date

CWV Review London Weather Station Move

TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Climatography of the United States No

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

Average temperature ( F) World Climate Zones. very cold all year with permanent ice and snow. very cold winters, cold summers, and little rain or snow

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

2003 Moisture Outlook

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

Time Series Analysis

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Climatography of the United States No

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Climatography of the United States No

The Climate of Payne County

Physical Features of Monsoon Asia. 192 Unit 7 Teachers Curriculum Institute 60 N 130 E 140 E 150 E 60 E 50 N 160 E 40 N 30 N 150 E.

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Climatography of the United States No

Urban Trails and Demand Response to Weather Variations

Climatography of the United States No

LAB J - WORLD CLIMATE ZONES

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

2016 Meteorology Summary

Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations CWV Review

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

The Climate of Grady County

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

CLIMATE OVERVIEW. Thunder Bay Climate Overview Page 1 of 5

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

BUDT 733 Data Analysis for Decision Makers

Climatography of the United States No

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Marshall County

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

The Climate of Texas County

The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 4 Northern Cascades

Climate Change and Arizona s Rangelands: Management Challenges and Opportunities

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Chapter 3. Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation

Responsive Traffic Management Through Short-Term Weather and Collision Prediction

The Climate of Haskell County

The Climate of Seminole County

The Climate of Murray County

Future Weather in Toronto and the GTA

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Lesson Adaptation Activity: Analyzing and Interpreting Data

Climate Variability. Eric Salathé. Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington. Thanks to Nathan Mantua

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Transcription:

The Effects of Weather on Urban Trail Use: A National Study Alireza Ermagun, Tracy Haden-Loh, Greg Lindsey May 3, 2016

Rails to Trails Conservancy Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform Objectives Monitor trail traffic at 45-50 locations in 12-13 cities in 7 climatic regions for > 1 year Describe patterns & variation in trail traffic Develop hourly, day-of-week, monthly, and day-of-year factors Develop models for estimating trail use Support trail development efforts

Paper Objectives 1. Describe monitoring results a. Annual average traffic by mode 2. Estimate weather models a. Cyclists b. Pedestrians c. Total (mixed-mode) trail traffic 3. Compare variation in effects of weather across climatic regions, by mode

Research Findings 1. AADB, AADP, AADTT vary over three orders of magnitude (< 100 to > 1,000) 2. Weather effects different for cyclists and pedestrians 3. Weather models differ by region 4. Models explain a. Most in very cold region (Duluth) b. Least in hot dry region (San Diego) An aside: confirming the obvious? Trying to answer how much

Dept. of Energy Climate Regions TMAP Monitoring Locations

Research Approach: Key Steps 1. Data cleaning (QA/QC) 2. Model specification: variable selection 3. Modeling a. Negative binomial models b. Cragg & Uhler's Pseudo R-Squared to assess goodness of fit

Some Challenges in QA/QC WOD Bon Air West 4000 3000 2000 1000 Bike 0 NDDDJJJJFFMMMAAAMMMMJJJJJJAAASSSOOONNNDDDJJJFFFMMMAAAMMMJJJJJJAAASSSOOONNNDDDJJJJFFMMMM Chula Vista Bayshore Bikeway NB & SB 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 NDDDJJJJFFMMMAAAMMMMJJJJJJAAASSSOOONNNDDDJJJFFFMMMAAAMMMJJJJJJAAASSSOOONNNDDDJJJJFFMMMM Bike

Cycling is More Seasonal than Walking (but not always) Bikes Billings MT 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 N-13 J-14 D-14 J-15 J-16 A-16 Peds Billings MT 1000 800 600 400 200 0 N-13 J-14 D-14 J-15 J-16 A-16 San Diego 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 N-13 J-14 D-14 J-15 J-16 A-16 San Diego 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 N-13 J-14 D-14 J-15 J-16 A-16

% of Annual Traffic 14% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 12% 10% 8% Hot Dry SD 6% 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 14% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 12% 10% 8% 6% Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 14% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 12% 10% 8% 6% Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Mixed Dry NM 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 14% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 12% 10% 8% 6% Mixed Humid VA Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Mixed Dry NM 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 16% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Mixed Humid VA Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Mixed Dry NM Marine WA 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 18% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% Mixed Humid VA Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Cold MN Mixed Dry NM Marine WA 4% 2% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

% of Annual Traffic 25% Seasonality in Bike Traffic Varies by Region 20% 15% 10% Mixed Humid VA Very Cold MN Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Cold MN Mixed Dry NM Marine WA 5% 0% Winter < 1% - < 10% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

3.0 Regional MADB / AADB Ratios 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Mixed Humid VA Very Cold MN Hot Dry SD Hot Humid FL Cold MN Mixed Dry NM Marine WA 0.5 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

3.0 MADB / AADB Ratios in Cold and Very Cold Regions 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Very Cold MN Cold MN Cold MT Cold IN Cold ME 0.5 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Variables in Weather Models Dependent variable = daily traffic volume (bike, ped, mixed-mode) Daylight hours Temperature Ave, squared Precipitation Dummy, interaction terms, squared Dew point Wind speed Snow depth Season Winter, Fall, Spring Holiday Weekend

Effects of Weather Vary by Region: Explanatory Power of Models Varies Pseudo R-squared Value Region Bike Models Ped Models Mixed-mode Models Very cold 0.91 0.82 0.88 Cold 0.52 0.43 0.52 Marine 0.66 0.14 0.38 Mixed dry 0.68 0.08 0.48 Mixed humid 0.56 0.48 0.56 Hot dry 0.21 0.05 0.19 Hot humid 0.45 0.19 0.36 National (all sites) 0.38 0.20 0.32

Effects of Weather on Cycling Vary by Region Weather Variable Very Cold Cold Marine Mixed Dry Mixed Humid Hot Dry Hot Humid Aggregate Day Light + + + + + + + Winter - + + - - Fall + + - + Spring - - Holiday - + + + Weekend + + + + + Tavg + + + + + + + + Tavg*Tavg - - - - - - - Precipitation=0 + + + + + + + + Precipitation - - - - - - - - Precipitation*2 + + + + + + + + DewPoint - - - - - + + DewPoint*DewPoint + + + + - - Avg Speed - - - - - - - - Scow Depth=0 + + + + + + + Constant + + - + - + - + Cragg & Uhler's R2 0.91 0.52 0.66 0.68 0.56 0.21 0.45 0.38

Research Findings 1. AADB, AADP, AADTT vary over three orders of magnitude (< 100 to > 1,000) 2. Weather effects different for cyclists, pedestrians 3. Weather models differ by region 4. Models explain a. Most in very cold region (Duluth) b. Least in hot dry region (San Diego)

Limitations - Lots 1. Limited number of sites in regions 2. Limited distribution of sites within regions 3. Subjectivity in QA/QC 4. Challenges in variable specification 5. Not controlling for interaction effects of culture, land use that may moderate effects of weather

Next Steps Review model specification Estimate general demand models Questions? Thank you!

Extra Slides with Modeling Details

Effects of Weather on Cycling Vary: Summary Variable Day Light Season Holiday Direction, Significance of Effect Positive, significant for all regions but cold Season: direction of effect varies by region (e.g., winter positive or negative) Varies, not significant in all regions Weekend Positive, but not significant in all regions Tavg Positive in all regions Tavg*Tavg Negative in all regions but very cold Precipitation=0 Dry (no precipitation: positive in all regions) Dew Point Negative in all regions but hot humid Ave wind speed Negative in all regions Snow Depth=0 No snow: positive (never snow in hot dry) Cragg & Uhler's R2 Range: 0.21-0.91

Effects of Weather on Walking Vary by Region Variables Very Cold Cold Marine Mixed Dry Mixed Humid Hot Dry Hot Humid Aggregate Day Light + + + + + + Winter + - - Fall - + + - + Spring + - Holiday + + + + Weekend + + + - + + + + Tavg + + + + + + + + Tavg*Tavg - - - - - - - Precepitation=0 + + + + + + + + Precipitation - - - - - - - Precipitation*2 + + + + DewPoint - - - - - + + DewPoint*DewPoint - + - - Avg Speed - - - - - + - Scow Depth=0 + + + Constant + + + + + - - + Cragg & Uhler's R2 0.82 0.43 0.14 0.08 0.48 0.05 0.19 0.2

Effects of Weather on Walking: Summary Variable Day Light Season Holiday Weekend Tavg Tavg*Tavg Direction, Significance of Effect Positive, significant for all regions but very cold, hot dry Season: direction of effect varies region (e.g., winter positive or negative) Varies: postive in some regions, insignificant in others Positive, significant in all regions but mixed dry (negative) Positive in all regions Negative in all regions but very cold Precepitation=0 Dry (no precipitation: positive in all regions) DewPoint Negative in all regions but hot humid Avg Wind Speed Negative in all regions but hot humid Snow Depth=0 No snow: varies, but positive in some regions Cragg & Uhler's Range: 0.05-0.82 R2