On a secant Dirichlet series and Eichler integrals of Eisenstein series

Similar documents
Special values of trigonometric Dirichlet series and Eichler integrals

Congruences for Fishburn numbers modulo prime powers

Arithmetic properties of harmonic weak Maass forms for some small half integral weights

arxiv: v2 [math.nt] 2 Jul 2013

Mahler measure as special values of L-functions

Class Number Type Relations for Fourier Coefficients of Mock Modular Forms

1. Introduction This paper investigates the properties of Ramanujan polynomials, which, for each k 0, the authors of [2] define to be

Mock modular forms and their shadows

Introduction to modular forms Perspectives in Mathematical Science IV (Part II) Nagoya University (Fall 2018)

Mock Modular Forms and Class Number Relations

Representations of integers as sums of an even number of squares. Özlem Imamoḡlu and Winfried Kohnen

FERMAT S WORLD A TOUR OF. Outline. Ching-Li Chai. Philadelphia, March, Samples of numbers. 2 More samples in arithemetic. 3 Congruent numbers

ON THE LIFTING OF HERMITIAN MODULAR. Notation

THE DIRICHLET DIVISOR PROBLEM, BESSEL SERIES EXPANSIONS IN RAMANUJAN S LOST NOTEBOOK, AND RIESZ SUMS. Bruce Berndt

Galois groups with restricted ramification

(τ) = q (1 q n ) 24. E 4 (τ) = q q q 3 + = (1 q) 240 (1 q 2 ) (1 q 3 ) (1.1)

Multiple Eisenstein series

A Motivated Introduction to Modular Forms

Mahler measure of K3 surfaces

Mahler measure and special values of L-functions

Ramanujan s first letter to Hardy: 5 + = 1 + e 2π 1 + e 4π 1 +

Some aspects of the multivariable Mahler measure

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 11 Jan 2017

On the generation of the coefficient field of a newform by a single Hecke eigenvalue

Introduction to Modular Forms

Projects on elliptic curves and modular forms

Periods and congruences of various lifts

Some remarks on signs in functional equations. Benedict H. Gross. Let k be a number field, and let M be a pure motive of weight n over k.

Modular forms, combinatorially and otherwise

Congruences among generalized Bernoulli numbers

A class of non-holomorphic modular forms

On Rankin-Cohen Brackets of Eigenforms

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS

LIFTS TO SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF HALF-INTEGRAL WEIGHT AND THE GENERALIZED MAASS RELATIONS (RESUME). S +(2n 2) 0. Notation

Basic Background on Mock Modular Forms and Weak Harmonic Maass Forms

20 The modular equation

arxiv: v3 [math.nt] 28 Jul 2012

IDENTITIES ABOUT INFINITE SERIES CONTAINING HYPERBOLIC FUNCTIONS AND TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS. Sung-Geun Lim

Multiple divisor functions, their algebraic structure and the relation to multiple zeta values

Congruence Subgroups

20 The modular equation

Converse theorems for modular L-functions

4 LECTURES ON JACOBI FORMS. 1. Plan

The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves

ARITHMETIC OF THE 13-REGULAR PARTITION FUNCTION MODULO 3

On the zeros of certain modular forms

Sign changes of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms supported on prime power indices

EICHLER-SHIMURA THEORY FOR MOCK MODULAR FORMS KATHRIN BRINGMANN, PAVEL GUERZHOY, ZACHARY KENT, AND KEN ONO

Mock and quantum modular forms

UNIMODULARITY OF ZEROS OF SELF-INVERSIVE POLYNOMIALS

Computing central values of twisted L-functions of higher degre

Eisenstein series for Jacobi forms of lattice index

Residual modular Galois representations: images and applications

On the low-lying zeros of elliptic curve L-functions

Modular Forms, Elliptic Curves, and Modular Curves

Lucas Congruences. A(n) = Pure Mathematics Seminar University of South Alabama. Armin Straub Oct 16, 2015 University of South Alabama.

Before we prove this result, we first recall the construction ( of) Suppose that λ is an integer, and that k := λ+ 1 αβ

Congruent Number Problem and Elliptic curves

The Riemann and Hurwitz zeta functions, Apery s constant and new rational series representations involving ζ(2k)

Galois Representations

Linear Mahler Measures and Double L-values of Modular Forms

A NOTE ON THE SHIMURA CORRESPONDENCE AND THE RAMANUJAN τ(n) FUNCTION

Analytic Aspects of the Riemann Zeta and Multiple Zeta Values

Ramanujan s Deathbed Letter. Larry Rolen. Emory University

On Mahler measures of several-variable polynomials and polylogarithms

La mesure de Mahler supérieure et la question de Lehmer

On the arithmetic of modular forms

INFINITE SUMS AS LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF POLYGAMMA FUNCTIONS

Why is the Riemann Hypothesis Important?

On irrationality and transcendency of infinite sums of rational numbers

q-series IDENTITIES AND VALUES OF CERTAIN L-FUNCTIONS Appearing in the Duke Mathematical Journal.

CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS CARL ERICKSON

PARITY OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF KLEIN S j-function

SOME CONGRUENCES FOR PARTITIONS THAT ARE p-cores. Frank G. Garvan

MULTILINEAR OPERATORS ON SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF GENUS 1 AND 2

denote the Dirichlet character associated to the extension Q( D)/Q, that is χ D

HECKE OPERATORS ON CERTAIN SUBSPACES OF INTEGRAL WEIGHT MODULAR FORMS.

Ramanujan s last prophecy: quantum modular forms

An Analogy of Bol s Result on Jacobi Forms and Siegel Modular Forms 1

GROSS-ZAGIER ON SINGULAR MODULI: THE ANALYTIC PROOF

FIELD THEORY. Contents

Exact Formulas for Invariants of Hilbert Schemes

arxiv: v1 [math.nt] 28 Jan 2010

Polylogarithms and Hyperbolic volumes Matilde N. Laĺın

Appendix A. Application to the three variable Rankin-Selberg p-adic L-functions. A corrigendum to [Ur14].

Notes on Equidistribution

A brief overview of modular and automorphic forms

A MIXED MOCK MODULAR SOLUTION OF KANEKO ZAGIER EQUATION. k(k + 1) E 12

Mahler s measure : proof of two conjectured formulae

Analytic number theory for probabilists

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case...

Quantum Mock Modular Forms Arising From eta-theta Functions

Reciprocity formulae for general Dedekind Rademacher sums

Computing congruences of modular forms modulo prime powers (extended version)

Elliptic multiple zeta values

Favorite Topics from Complex Arithmetic, Analysis and Related Algebra

CYCLE INTEGRALS OF THE J-FUNCTION AND MOCK MODULAR FORMS

Dimension formulas for vector-valued Hilbert modular forms

Balanced subgroups of the multiplicative group

INDEFINITE THETA FUNCTIONS OF TYPE (n, 1) I: DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

Transcription:

On a secant Dirichlet series and Eichler integrals of Eisenstein series Oberseminar Zahlentheorie Universität zu Köln University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign November 12, 2013 & Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Bonn Based on joint work with: Bruce Berndt University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign 1 / 33

PART I A secant Dirichlet series ψ s (τ) = n=1 sec(πnτ) n s 2 / 33

Secant zeta function Laĺın, Rodrigue and Rogers introduce and study ψ s (τ) = n=1 sec(πnτ) n s. Clearly, ψ s (0) = ζ(s). In particular, ψ 2 (0) = π2 6. EG LRR 13 ψ 2 ( 2) = π2 3, ψ 2( 6) = 2π2 3 3 / 33

Secant zeta function Laĺın, Rodrigue and Rogers introduce and study ψ s (τ) = n=1 sec(πnτ) n s. Clearly, ψ s (0) = ζ(s). In particular, ψ 2 (0) = π2 6. EG LRR 13 ψ 2 ( 2) = π2 3, ψ 2( 6) = 2π2 3 CONJ LRR 13 For positive integers m, r, ψ 2m ( r) Q π 2m. 3 / 33

Secant zeta function: Motivation Euler s identity: n=1 1 n 2m = 1 2 (2πi)2m B 2m (2m)! Half of the Clausen and Glaisher functions reduce, e.g., n=1 cos(nτ) n 2m = poly m(τ), poly 1 (τ) = τ 2 4 πτ 2 + π2 6. Ramanujan investigated trigonometric Dirichlet series of similar type. From his first letter to Hardy: n=1 coth(πn) n 7 = 19π7 56700 In fact, this was already included in a general formula by Lerch. 4 / 33

Secant zeta function: Convergence ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s has singularity at rationals with even denominator 6 10 4 5 2 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 4 ψ 2 (τ) truncated to 4 and 8 terms 10 Re ψ 2 (τ + εi) with ε = 1/1000 5 / 33

Secant zeta function: Convergence ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s has singularity at rationals with even denominator 6 10 4 5 2 2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 4 ψ 2 (τ) truncated to 4 and 8 terms 10 Re ψ 2 (τ + εi) with ε = 1/1000 THM Laĺın Rodrigue Rogers 2013 The series ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s 1 τ = p/q with q odd and s > 1, 2 τ is algebraic irrational and s 2. converges absolutely if Proof uses Thue Siegel Roth, as well as a result of Worley when s = 2 and τ is irrational 5 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation Obviously, ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s THM LRR, BS 2013 (1 + τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( τ 1 + τ = π 2m rat(τ) satisfies ψ s (τ + 2) = ψ s (τ). ) (1 τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( ) τ 1 τ 6 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation Obviously, ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s THM LRR, BS 2013 (1 + τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( τ 1 + τ = π 2m rat(τ) satisfies ψ s (τ + 2) = ψ s (τ). ) (1 τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( ) τ 1 τ proof Collect residues of the integral I C = 1 sin (πτz) dz 2πi sin(π(1 + τ)z) sin(π(1 τ)z) z s+1. C C are appropriate circles around the origin such that I C 0 as radius(c). 6 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation Obviously, ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s THM LRR, BS 2013 (1 + τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( τ 1 + τ satisfies ψ s (τ + 2) = ψ s (τ). ) (1 τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( = π 2m [z 2m 1 sin(τ z) ] sin((1 τ)z) sin((1 + τ)z) ) τ 1 τ proof Collect residues of the integral I C = 1 sin (πτz) dz 2πi sin(π(1 + τ)z) sin(π(1 τ)z) z s+1. C C are appropriate circles around the origin such that I C 0 as radius(c). 6 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation Obviously, ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s THM LRR, BS 2013 DEF slash operator (1 + τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( τ 1 + τ satisfies ψ s (τ + 2) = ψ s (τ). ) (1 τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( = π 2m [z 2m 1 sin(τ z) ] sin((1 τ)z) sin((1 + τ)z) F k ( a b c d ) (τ) = (cτ + d) k F ( ) aτ + b cτ + d ) τ 1 τ 6 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation Obviously, ψ s (τ) = sec(πnτ) n s THM LRR, BS 2013 DEF slash operator In terms of (1 + τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( τ 1 + τ satisfies ψ s (τ + 2) = ψ s (τ). ) (1 τ) 2m 1 ψ 2m ( = π 2m [z 2m 1 sin(τ z) ] sin((1 τ)z) sin((1 + τ)z) F k ( a b c d ) (τ) = (cτ + d) k F T = ( ) 1 1, S = 0 1 the functional equations become ψ 2m 1 2m (T 2 1) = 0, ( ) aτ + b cτ + d ( ) 0 1, R = 1 0 ψ 2m 1 2m (R 2 1) = π 2m rat(τ). ) τ 1 τ ( ) 1 0, 1 1 6 / 33

Secant zeta function: Functional equation The matrices T 2 = together with I, generate ( ) 1 2, R 2 = 0 1 ( ) 1 0, 2 1 Γ(2) = {γ SL 2 (Z) : γ I (mod 2)}. COR For any γ Γ(2), ψ 2m 1 2m (γ 1) = π 2m rat(τ). 7 / 33

Secant zeta function: Special values THM LRR, BS 2013 For positive integers m, r, ψ 2m ( r) Q π 2m. proof Note that ( X ry Y X ) r = r. As shown by Lagrange, there are X and Y which solve Pell s equation X 2 ry 2 = 1. ψ 2m 1 2m (γ 1) = π 2m rat(τ). 8 / 33

Secant zeta function: Special values THM LRR, BS 2013 For positive integers m, r, ψ 2m ( r) Q π 2m. proof Note that ( X ry Y X ) r = r. As shown by Lagrange, there are X and Y which solve Pell s equation X 2 ry 2 = 1. Since ( ) 2 X ry γ = = Y X ( X 2 + ry 2 ) 2rXY 2XY X 2 + ry 2 Γ(2), the claim follows from the evenness of ψ 2m and ψ 2m 1 2m (γ 1) = π 2m rat(τ). 8 / 33

Secant zeta function: Special values EG For integers κ, µ, ψ 2 (κ + ψ 4 (κ + κ κ ( 1 µ + κ ) ) = π2 6 ( 1 µ + κ ) ) = π4 90 ( 1 + 3κ ), 2µ ( 1 + 5κ 2µ 5κ2 (16µ 2 15) 8µ 2 (4κµ + 3) ). 9 / 33

PART II Eichler integrals of Eisenstein series f(τ) = i τ [f(z) a(0)] (z τ) k 2 dz 10 / 33

Eichler integrals D = 1 d 2πi dτ h = D h 4πy derivative Maass raising operator h (F h γ)=( h F ) h+2 γ n h = h+2(n 1) h+2 h 11 / 33

Eichler integrals D = 1 d 2πi dτ h = D h 4πy derivative Maass raising operator h (F h γ)=( h F ) h+2 γ n h = h+2(n 1) h+2 h By induction on n, following Lewis Zagier 2001, h n n ( ) ( n + h 1 n! = 1 ) j D n j j 4πy (n j)!. j=0 11 / 33

Eichler integrals D = 1 d 2πi dτ h = D h 4πy derivative Maass raising operator h (F h γ)=( h F ) h+2 γ n h = h+2(n 1) h+2 h By induction on n, following Lewis Zagier 2001, h n n ( ) ( n + h 1 n! = 1 ) j D n j j 4πy (n j)!. j=0 In the special case n = 1 h, with h = 2 k, k 1 2 k = Dk 1. 11 / 33

Eichler integrals THM Bol 1949 For all sufficiently differentiable F and all γ SL 2 (Z), D k 1 (F 2 k γ) = (D k 1 F ) k γ. EG k = 2 ( ) [ aτ + b (DF ) 2 γ = (cτ + d) 2 F = D F cτ + d ( )] aτ + b cτ + d 12 / 33

Eichler integrals THM Bol 1949 For all sufficiently differentiable F and all γ SL 2 (Z), D k 1 (F 2 k γ) = (D k 1 F ) k γ. EG k = 2 ( ) [ aτ + b (DF ) 2 γ = (cτ + d) 2 F = D F cτ + d ( )] aτ + b cτ + d F is an Eichler integral if D k 1 F is modular of weight k. Then D k 1 (F 2 k γ) = D k 1 F, and hence F 2 k (γ 1) = poly(τ), deg poly k 2. poly(τ) is a period polynomial of the modular form. 12 / 33

Eichler integrals For modular f(τ) = a(n)q n, weight k, define the Eichler integral f(τ) = i τ [f(z) a(0)] (z τ) k 2 dz = ( 1)k Γ(k 1) (2πi) k 1 n=1 a(n) n k 1 qn. If a(0) = 0, f is an Eichler integral in the strict sense of the previous slide. 13 / 33

Eichler integrals For modular f(τ) = a(n)q n, weight k, define the Eichler integral f(τ) = i τ [f(z) a(0)] (z τ) k 2 dz = ( 1)k Γ(k 1) (2πi) k 1 n=1 a(n) n k 1 qn. If a(0) = 0, f is an Eichler integral in the strict sense of the previous slide. EG For cusp forms f of level 1, the period polynomial ρ f (X) is f 2 k (S 1) = i 0 f(z)(z X) k 2 dz k 1 ( ) k 2 Γ(s) = ( 1) k s 1 (2πi) s L(f, s)xk s 1. s=1 13 / 33

The period polynomials Let U = T S = ( ) 1 1 1 0, and define { W k 2 = p C[X] : p 2 k (1 + S) = p 2 k (1 + U + U 2 ) = 0 deg p=k 2 }. 14 / 33

The period polynomials Let U = T S = ( ) 1 1 1 0, and define { W k 2 = p C[X] : p 2 k (1 + S) = p 2 k (1 + U + U 2 ) = 0 deg p=k 2 Denote with p the odd part of p. THM Eichler Shimura The space of (level 1) cusp forms S k is isomorphic to W k 2 via f ρ f (X). }. Similarly, W k 2 is isomorphic to S k M k. 14 / 33

The period polynomials in higher level Let Γ be of finite index in Γ 1 = SL 2 (Z). Let V k 2 be the polynomials of degree at most k 2. DEF Paşol Popa 2013 The multiple period polynomial of f is ρ f (A)(X) = ρ f : Γ\Γ 1 V k 2, i 0 [f A(z) a 0 (f A)] (z X) k 2 dz. γ Γ 1 acts on p : Γ\Γ 1 V k 2 by p γ(a) = p(aγ 1 ) 2 k γ. Paşol and Popa extend Eichler Shimura isomorphism to this settinsetting. 15 / 33

Eichler integrals of Eisenstein series For the Eisenstein series G 2k, G 2k (τ) = 2ζ(2k) + 2 (2πi)2k Γ(2k) G 2k (τ) = 4πi 2k 1 n=1 σ 2k 1 (n)q n, n=1 σ 2k 1 (n) n 2k 1 q n. n 1 2k q n 1 q n n 2k 1 q n 1 q n 16 / 33

Eichler integrals of Eisenstein series For the Eisenstein series G 2k, G 2k (τ) = 2ζ(2k) + 2 (2πi)2k Γ(2k) G 2k (τ) = 4πi 2k 1 n=1 σ 2k 1 (n)q n, n=1 σ 2k 1 (n) n 2k 1 q n. n 1 2k q n 1 q n The period polynomial G 2k 2 2k (S 1) is given by (2πi) 2k 2k 1 [ k s=0 n 2k 1 q n 1 q n ] B 2s B 2k 2s ζ(2k 1) (2s)! (2k 2s)! X2s 1 + (2πi) 2k 1 (X2k 2 1). 16 / 33

Ramanujan s formula THM Ramanujan, Grosswald For α, β > 0 such that αβ = π 2 and m Z, α m { ζ(2m + 1) 2 2 2m m+1 + n=1 n 2m 1 e 2αn 1 } = ( β) m { ζ(2m + 1) 2 ( 1) n B 2n B 2m 2n+2 (2n)! (2m 2n + 2)! αm n+1 β n. n=0 + n=1 n 2m 1 e 2βn 1 } 17 / 33

Ramanujan s formula THM Ramanujan, Grosswald For α, β > 0 such that αβ = π 2 and m Z, α m { ζ(2m + 1) 2 2 2m m+1 + n=1 n 2m 1 e 2αn 1 } = ( β) m { ζ(2m + 1) 2 ( 1) n B 2n B 2m 2n+2 (2n)! (2m 2n + 2)! αm n+1 β n. n=0 + n=1 n 2m 1 e 2βn 1 } In terms of ξ s (τ) = n=1 Ramanujan s formula takes the form cot(πnτ) n s, 1 e x 1 = 1 2 cot( x 2 ) 1 2 k ξ 2k 1 2 2k (S 1) = ( 1) k (2π) 2k 1 B 2s B 2k 2s (2s)! (2k 2s)! τ 2s 1. s=0 17 / 33

Secant zeta function cot(πnτ) n 2k 1 is an Eichler integral of the Eisenstein series G 2k. EG cot(πτ) = 1 π j Z 1 τ + j lim N N j= N 18 / 33

Secant zeta function cot(πnτ) n 2k 1 is an Eichler integral of the Eisenstein series G 2k. EG cot(πτ) = 1 π j Z 1 τ + j lim N N j= N sec(πnτ) n 2k EG is an Eichler integral of an Eisenstein series with character. sec ( πτ ) = 2 χ 4 (j) 2 π τ + j j Z m,n Z χ 4 (n) is an Eisenstein series of weight 2k + 1. (mτ + n) 2k+1 18 / 33

Eisenstein series More generally, we have the Eisenstein series E k (τ; χ, ψ) = m,n Z χ(m)ψ(n) (mτ + n) k, where χ and ψ are Dirichlet characters modulo L and M. We assume χ( 1)ψ( 1) = ( 1) k. Otherwise, E k (τ; χ, ψ) = 0. 19 / 33

Eisenstein series More generally, we have the Eisenstein series E k (τ; χ, ψ) = m,n Z χ(m)ψ(n) (mτ + n) k, where χ and ψ are Dirichlet characters modulo L and M. We assume χ( 1)ψ( 1) = ( 1) k. Otherwise, E k (τ; χ, ψ) = 0. PROP Modular transformations: γ = ( ) a Mb Lc d SL2 (Z) E k (τ; χ, ψ) k γ = χ(d) ψ(d)e k (τ; χ, ψ) E k (τ; χ, ψ) k S = χ( 1)E k (τ; ψ, χ) PROP If ψ is primitive, the L-function of E(τ) = E k (τ; χ, ψ) is L(E, s) = const M s L(χ, s)l( ψ, 1 k + s). 19 / 33

Generalized Bernoulli numbers EG Euler ζ(2n) = 1 2 (2πi)2n B 2n (2n)! For integer n > 0 and primitive χ with χ( 1) = ( 1) n, (χ of conductor L and Gauss sum G(χ)) n 1 G(χ) L(n, χ) = ( 1) 2 L(1 n, χ) = B n,χ /n. ( ) 2πi n B n, χ, L n! The generalized Bernoulli numbers have generating function n=0 B n,χ x n n! = L a=1 χ(a)xe ax e Lx 1. 20 / 33

Period polynomials of Eisenstein series THM Berndt-S 2013 For k 3 and primitive χ 1, ψ 1, Ẽ k (X; χ, ψ) ψ( 1)X k 2 Ẽ k ( 1/X; ψ, χ) k B k s, χ B s, ψ = const (k s)!l k s s!m s Xs 1. s=0 const = χ( 1)G (χ) G(ψ) (2πi)k k 1 21 / 33

Period polynomials of Eisenstein series THM Berndt-S 2013 For k 3 and primitive χ 1, ψ 1, Ẽ k (X; χ, ψ) ψ( 1)X k 2 Ẽ k ( 1/X; ψ, χ) k B k s, χ B s, ψ = const (k s)!l k s s!m s Xs 1. s=0 const = χ( 1)G (χ) G(ψ) (2πi)k k 1 If χ or ψ are principal, then we need to add to the RHS: 2ψ( 1) [ ] k 1 πi δ χ=1 L(k 1, ψ)x k 2 δ ψ=1 L(k 1, χ) Recall that we assume χ( 1)ψ( 1) = ( 1) k. 21 / 33

Period polynomials of Eisenstein series COR Berndt-S 2013 For k 3, primitive χ, ψ 1, and n such that L n, Ẽ k (X; χ, ψ) 2 k (1 R n ) k = const s=0 R n = ( 1 0 n 1 ) B k s, χ (k s)!l k s B s, ψ s!m s Xs 1 2 k (1 R n ). Note that X s 1 2 k (1 R n ) = X s 1 (1 (nx + 1) k 1 s ). 22 / 33

Application: Grosswald-type formula for Dirichlet L-values THM Berndt-S 2013 For α H, such that R k (α; χ, 1) = 0 and α k 2 1, (k 3, χ primitive, χ( 1) = ( 1) k ) [ Ẽ k ( α 1 k 1 L(k 1, χ) = 2πi(1 α k 2 ) 2 [ χ(n) = 1 α k 2 n k 1 n=1 ) L ; χ, 1 ( )] 1 1/α α k 2 Ẽ k ; χ, 1 L 1 1 e 2πin(1 α)/l α k 2 1 e 2πin(1/α 1)/L ]. 23 / 33

Application: Grosswald-type formula for Dirichlet L-values THM Berndt-S 2013 For α H, such that R k (α; χ, 1) = 0 and α k 2 1, (k 3, χ primitive, χ( 1) = ( 1) k ) [ Ẽ k ( α 1 k 1 L(k 1, χ) = 2πi(1 α k 2 ) 2 [ χ(n) = 1 α k 2 n k 1 n=1 ) L ; χ, 1 ( )] 1 1/α α k 2 Ẽ k ; χ, 1 L 1 1 e 2πin(1 α)/l α k 2 1 e 2πin(1/α 1)/L ]. THM Gun Murty Rath 2011 As β H, β 2k 2 1, ranges over algebraic numbers, the values 1 [Ẽ2k (β; 1, 1) β 2k 2 Ẽ 2k ( 1/β; 1, 1)] π contain at most one algebraic number. 23 / 33

PART III Unimodularity of period polynomials R k (X) = k s=0 B s s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 24 / 33

Unimodular polynomials DEF p(x) is unimodular if all its zeros have absolute value 1. Kronecker: if p(x) Z[x] is monic and unimodular, hence Mahler measure 1, then all of its roots are roots of unity. EG Lehmer x 10 + z 9 z 7 z 6 z 5 z 4 z 3 + z + 1 has only the two real roots 0.850, 1.176 off the unit circle. Lehmer s conjecture: 1.176... is the smallest Mahler measure (greater than 1) 25 / 33

Unimodular polynomials DEF p(x) is unimodular if all its zeros have absolute value 1. Kronecker: if p(x) Z[x] is monic and unimodular, hence Mahler measure 1, then all of its roots are roots of unity. EG Lehmer EG x 10 + z 9 z 7 z 6 z 5 z 4 z 3 + z + 1 has only the two real roots 0.850, 1.176 off the unit circle. Lehmer s conjecture: 1.176... is the smallest Mahler measure (greater than 1) x 2 + 6 5 x + 1 = ( x + 3+4i 5 ) ( ) x + 3 4i 5 25 / 33

Unimodular polynomials DEF p(x) is unimodular if all its zeros have absolute value 1. Kronecker: if p(x) Z[x] is monic and unimodular, hence Mahler measure 1, then all of its roots are roots of unity. EG Lehmer EG THM Cohn 1922 x 10 + z 9 z 7 z 6 z 5 z 4 z 3 + z + 1 has only the two real roots 0.850, 1.176 off the unit circle. Lehmer s conjecture: 1.176... is the smallest Mahler measure (greater than 1) x 2 + 6 5 x + 1 = ( x + 3+4i 5 P (x) is unimodular if and only if ) ( ) x + 3 4i 5 P (x) = a 0 + a 1 x +... + a n x n is self-inversive, i.e. a k = εa n k for some ε = 1, and P (x) has all its roots within the unit circle. 25 / 33

Ramanujan polynomials Following Gun Murty Rath, the Ramanujan polynomials are k X Bs Bk s Rk (X) = X s 1. s! (k s)! s=0 THM MurtySmythWang 11 THM Lalı n-smyth 13 All nonreal zeros of Rk (X) lie on the unit circle. For k > 2, R2k (X) has exactly four real roots which approach ±2±1. R2k (X) + ζ(2k 1) 2k 2 (X 1) is unimodular. (2πi)2k 1 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0-0.5-0.5 full R20 (X) R20 (X) -1.0-1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 26 / 33

Ramanujan polynomials 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0-0.5-0.5-1.0-1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 R20 (X) -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 full (X) R20 27 / 33

Ramanujan polynomials 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0-0.5-0.5-1.0-1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 R20 (X) -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 full (X) R20 27 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials Consider the following generalized Ramanujan polynomials: R k (X) = R k (X; χ, ψ) = k s=0 k s=0 B s s! B s,χ s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 B k s,ψ (k s)! ( ) X 1 k s 1 (1 X s 1 ) M 28 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials Consider the following generalized Ramanujan polynomials: R k (X) = R k (X; χ, ψ) = k s=0 k s=0 B s s! B s,χ s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 B k s,ψ (k s)! ( ) X 1 k s 1 (1 X s 1 ) M PROP Berndt-S 2013 For k > 1, R 2k (X; 1, 1) = R 2k (X). R k (X; χ, ψ) is self-inversive. 28 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials Consider the following generalized Ramanujan polynomials: R k (X) = R k (X; χ, ψ) = k s=0 k s=0 B s s! B s,χ s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 B k s,ψ (k s)! ( ) X 1 k s 1 (1 X s 1 ) M PROP Berndt-S 2013 For k > 1, R 2k (X; 1, 1) = R 2k (X). R k (X; χ, ψ) is self-inversive. CONJ If χ, ψ are nonprincipal real, then R k (X; χ, ψ) is unimodular. 28 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials EG R k (X; χ, 1) For χ real, apparently unimodular unless: χ = 1: R 2k (X; 1, 1) has real roots approaching ±2 ±1 χ = 3 : R 2k+1 (X; 3, 1) has real roots approaching 2 ±1 29 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials EG R k (X; χ, 1) For χ real, apparently unimodular unless: χ = 1: R 2k (X; 1, 1) has real roots approaching ±2 ±1 χ = 3 : R 2k+1 (X; 3, 1) has real roots approaching 2 ±1 EG Apparently: R k (X; 1, ψ) unimodular for ψ one of 3, 4, 5+, 8±, 11, 12+, 13+, 19, 21+, 24+,... all nonreal roots on the unit circle if ψ is one of 1+, 7, 15, 17+, 20, 23, 24,... four nonreal zeros off the unit circle if ψ is one of 35, 59, 83, 131, 155, 179,... 29 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials A second kind of generalized Ramanujan polynomials: R k (X) = S k (X; χ, ψ) = k s=0 k s=0 B s s! Obviously, S k (X; 1, 1) = R k (X). B s,χ s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 B k s,ψ (k s)! ( ) LX k s 1 M 30 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials A second kind of generalized Ramanujan polynomials: R k (X) = S k (X; χ, ψ) = k s=0 k s=0 B s s! Obviously, S k (X; 1, 1) = R k (X). CONJ B s,χ s! B k s (k s)! Xs 1 B k s,ψ (k s)! ( ) LX k s 1 M If χ is nonprincipal real, then S k (X; χ, χ) is unimodular (up to trivial zero roots). 30 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0-0.5-0.5-1.0-1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 R19 (X; 1, χ 4 ) -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 S20 (X; χ 4, χ 4 ) 31 / 33

Generalized Ramanujan polynomials 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0-0.5-0.5-1.0-1.0-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 R19 (X; 1, χ 4 ) -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 S20 (X; χ 4, χ 4 ) 31 / 33

Unimodularity of period polynomials Both kinds of generalized Ramanujan polynomials are, essentially, period polynomials: χ, ψ primitive, nonprincipal S k (X; χ, ψ) = const [Ẽk (X; χ, ψ) ψ( 1)X k 2 Ẽ k ( 1/X; ψ, ] χ) R k (LX + 1; χ, ψ) = S k (X; χ, ψ) 2 k (1 R L ) = const Ẽk(X; χ, ψ) 2 k (1 R L ) 32 / 33

Unimodularity of period polynomials Both kinds of generalized Ramanujan polynomials are, essentially, period polynomials: χ, ψ primitive, nonprincipal S k (X; χ, ψ) = const [Ẽk (X; χ, ψ) ψ( 1)X k 2 Ẽ k ( 1/X; ψ, ] χ) R k (LX + 1; χ, ψ) = S k (X; χ, ψ) 2 k (1 R L ) THM Conrey- Farmer- Imamoglu 2012 THM El-Guindy Raji 2013 = const Ẽk(X; χ, ψ) 2 k (1 R L ) For any Hecke cusp form (for SL 2 (Z)), the odd part of its period polynomial has trivial zeros at 0, ±2, ± 1 2, and all remaining zeros lie on the unit circle. For any Hecke eigenform (for SL 2 (Z)), the full period polynomial has all zeros on the unit circle. 32 / 33

THANK YOU! Slides for this talk will be available from my website: http://arminstraub.com/talks B. Berndt, A. Straub Preprint, 2013 33 / 33