Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Fall 2018 Eugene V Colla

Similar documents
Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Fall 2017 Eugene V Colla

Basic Error Analysis. Physics 401 Spring 2015 Eugene V Colla

Physics 401. Fall 2018 Eugene V. Colla. 10/8/2018 Physics 401 1

Physics 401. Fall 2017 Eugene V. Colla. 10/9/2017 Physics 401 1

; F- Faraday constant, N A - Avagadro constant. Best. uncertainty ~1.6 ppm. 4. From Josephson (K J = 2e. constants. ) and von Klitzing R h

; F- Faraday constant, N A - Avagadro constant. Best. uncertainty ~1.6 ppm. 4. From Josephson (K J = 2e. constants. ) and von Klitzing R h

Physics 401, Spring 2016 Eugene V. Colla

Computer simulation of radioactive decay

Pulses in transmission lines

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Weather Station Setup and Verification

Error propagation. Alexander Khanov. October 4, PHYS6260: Experimental Methods is HEP Oklahoma State University

Signal types. Signal characteristics: RMS, power, db Probability Density Function (PDF). Analogue-to-Digital Conversion (ADC).

Error? Relative error = Theory: g = 9.8 m/sec 2 Measured: g = 9.7 m/sec 2

by A.Tonina*, R.Iuzzolino*, M.Bierzychudek* and M.Real* S. Solve + R. Chayramy + and M. Stock +

Electric Field Mapping

Uncertainty in Measurements

Application Note AN37. Noise Histogram Analysis. by John Lis

EIE 240 Electrical and Electronic Measurements Class 2: January 16, 2015 Werapon Chiracharit. Measurement

Notes Errors and Noise PHYS 3600, Northeastern University, Don Heiman, 6/9/ Accuracy versus Precision. 2. Errors

Uncertainties and Error Propagation Part I of a manual on Uncertainties, Graphing, and the Vernier Caliper

Some Statistics. V. Lindberg. May 16, 2007

BRIDGE CIRCUITS EXPERIMENT 5: DC AND AC BRIDGE CIRCUITS 10/2/13

Switch. R 5 V Capacitor. ower upply. Voltmete. Goals. Introduction

Fundamentals of data, graphical, and error analysis

Switch. R 5 V Capacitor. ower upply. Voltmete. Goals. Introduction

EXPERIMENT 4 ONE DIMENSIONAL MOTION

Physics 401. Classical Physics Laboratory.

Experiment 2. F r e e F a l l

Error Analysis. V. Lorenz L. Yang, M. Grosse Perdekamp, D. Hertzog, R. Clegg PHYS403 Spring 2016

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

dn(t) dt where λ is the constant decay probability per unit time. The solution is N(t) = N 0 exp( λt)

by S. Solve +, R. Chayramy +, M. Stock +, D. Vlad*

Coupled Electrical Oscillators Physics Advanced Physics Lab - Summer 2018 Don Heiman, Northeastern University, 5/24/2018

AE2160 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace

Measurements of a Table

PROBLEMS FOR EXPERIMENT ES: ESTIMATING A SECOND Solutions

Correlation, discrete Fourier transforms and the power spectral density

Computer 3. Lifetime Measurement

Switch. R 5 V Capacitor. ower upply. Voltmete. Goals. Introduction

Part I. Experimental Error

Some hints for the Radioactive Decay lab

Technical Procedure for Glass Refractive Index Measurement System 3 (GRIM 3)

University of TN Chattanooga Physics 1040L 8/18/2012 PHYSICS 1040L LAB LAB 4: R.C. TIME CONSTANT LAB

Lab 5 CAPACITORS & RC CIRCUITS

Radioactivity: Experimental Uncertainty

ES205 Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems: Lab 1: An Introductory Tutorial: Getting Started with SIMULINK

The Treatment of Numerical Experimental Results

Discrete Simulation of Power Law Noise

Magnetic Fields. Experiment 1. Magnetic Field of a Straight Current-Carrying Conductor

THE GEIGER-MULLER TUBE AND THE STATISTICS OF RADIOACTIVITY

Lab 1 Uniform Motion - Graphing and Analyzing Motion

Protean Instrument Dutchtown Road, Knoxville, TN TEL/FAX:

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Physics 8.02 Spring 2003 Experiment 17: RLC Circuit (modified 4/15/2003) OBJECTIVES

Elementary charge and Millikan experiment Students worksheet

Basic Procedures for Common Problems

Rutherford Scattering

Introduction to Statistics and Error Analysis

Section 5.6 Integration by Parts

NE01 - Centripetal Force. Laboratory Manual Experiment NE01 - Centripetal Force Department of Physics The University of Hong Kong

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department. Experiment 03: Work and Energy

Introduction to Error Analysis

Probability & Statistics: Introduction. Robert Leishman Mark Colton ME 363 Spring 2011

Pulses in transmission lines

Experiment 1: The Same or Not The Same?

Experiment A12 Monte Carlo Night! Procedure

A Statistical Study of PITCHf/x Pitched Baseball Trajectories

EXPERIMENT 2 Reaction Time Objectives Theory

Counting Statistics and Error Propagation!

Experiment 1 Simple Measurements and Error Estimation

Exercise 4 Modeling transient currents and voltages

Experiment P43: RC Circuit (Power Amplifier, Voltage Sensor)

Lecture 23. Lidar Error and Sensitivity Analysis (2)

OBJECTIVE: To understand the relation between electric fields and electric potential, and how conducting objects can influence electric fields.

SHM Simple Harmonic Motion revised May 23, 2017

Lab 1g: Horizontally Forced Pendulum & Chaotic Motion

STATISTICS OF OBSERVATIONS & SAMPLING THEORY. Parent Distributions

Review for the First Midterm Exam

ELEG 3143 Probability & Stochastic Process Ch. 6 Stochastic Process

Appendix A: Math Review

NCSS Statistical Software. Harmonic Regression. This section provides the technical details of the model that is fit by this procedure.

Treatment of Error in Experimental Measurements

Lab 4: Gauss Gun Conservation of Energy

Lab 4: Introduction to Signal Processing: Fourier Transform

Lab 4 CAPACITORS & RC CIRCUITS

August 7, 2007 NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF LAPLACE'S EQUATION

Physics 6720 Introduction to Statistics April 4, 2017

Measurements & Instrumentation

Foundations of Modern Physics by Tipler, Theory: The dierential equation which describes the population N(t) is. dn(t) dt.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Data Analysis: phy122-bennett -1-8/26/02

Measurements and Errors

Hall Coefficient of Germanium

Lab 10: DC RC circuits

B THE CAPACITOR. Theory

Junior Laboratory. PHYC 307L, Spring Webpage:

ECE-340, Spring 2015 Review Questions

Data Analysis for University Physics

Life Cycle of Stars. Photometry of star clusters with SalsaJ. Authors: Daniel Duggan & Sarah Roberts

Uncertainty in Physical Measurements: Module 5 Data with Two Variables

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department

Transcription:

Basic Error Analysis Physics 401 Fall 2018 Eugene V Colla

Errors and uncertainties The Reading Error Accuracy and precession Systematic and statistical errors Fitting errors Appendix. Working with oil drop data Nonlinear fitting physics 401 2

T = 63 ±? Best guess T~0. 5 Wind speed 4mph±? Best guess ±0. 5mph physics 401 3

Clearance fit physics 401 4

Measurement of the speed of the light 1675 Ole Roemer: 220,000 Km/sec Does it make sense? What is missing? Ole Christensen Rømer 1644-1710 NIST Bolder Colorado c = 299,792,456.2±1.1 m/s. physics 401 5

L 0. 5mm L=53mm±ΔL(?) Acrylic rod L 0. 03mm How far we have to go in reducing the reading error? We do not care about accuracy better than 1mm If ruler is not okay, we need to use digital caliper Probably the natural limit of accuracy can be due to length uncertainty because of temperature expansion. For 53mm L 0. 012mm/K Reading Error = ± 1 2 (least count or minimum gradation). physics 401 6

Fluke 8845A multimeter Example Vdc (reading)=0.85v V = 0. 83 1. 8 10 5 +1. 0 0. 7 10 5 2. 2 10 5 = 22μV physics 401 7

The accuracy of an experiment is a measure of how close the result of the experiment comes to the true value Precision refers to how closely individual measurements agree with each other physics 401 8

physics 401 9

Systematic Error: reproducible inaccuracy introduced by faulty equipment, calibration or technique. Random errors: Indefiniteness of results due to finite precision of experiment. Measure of fluctuation in result after repeatable experimentation. Philip R. Bevington Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical sciences, McGraw-Hill, 1969 physics 401 10

Sources of systematic errors: poor calibration of the equipment, changes of environmental conditions, imperfect method of observation, drift and some offset in readings etc. Example #1: measuring of the DC voltage R in Current source I R U E off E off =f(time,temperature) expectation U=R*I U = actual result R I R R in 1 + R E off physics 401R in 11

Example #3: poor calibration Measuring of the speed of the second sound in superfluid He4 20 Published data T l =2.17K 15 LHe Resonator U 2 (m/s) 10 P403 results T l =2.1K 10mA 5 HP34401A DMM 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 T (K) Temperature sensor physics 401 12

Result of measurement Systematic error X meas = X true + e s + e r Correct value Random error 0.35 B 0.35 e s B 0.30 0.25 e s =0 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.20 P 0.15 P 0.15 0.10 X true 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X i 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X X i true physics 401 13

Pn t ) rt ) n! n e rt n 0,1,2,... r: decay rate [counts/s] t: time interval [s] Pn(rt) : Probability to have n decays in time interval t Siméon Denis Poisson (1781-1840) A statistical process is described through a Poisson Distribution if: rt=1 0.3 rt=4 0.2 P rt=10 0.1 0.0 0 5 random process for a given nucleus probability for a decay to occur is the same in each time interval. o universal probability the probability to decay in a given time interval is same for all nuclei. o no correlation between two instances (the decay of on nucleus does not change the probability for a second nucleus tophysics decay. 401 14 o 10 15 number of counts 20

) rt ) rt Pn t e n n! n 0,1,2,... r: decay rate [counts/s] t: time interval [s] P n (rt) : Probability to have n decays in time interval t Properties of the Poisson distribution: 0.3 0.2 rt=10 < n >= rt σ = rt n n0 P ( rt) 1, probabilities sum to 1 P 0.1 n n P ( rt) rt, the mean n0 n 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 number of counts ( ) 2 n n P ( ), n0 n rt rt standard deviation physics 401 15

) rt ) rt Pn t e n n! n 0,1,2,... Poisson and Gaussian distributions 0.1 probability of occurence 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 10 20 30 40 "Poisson distribution" "Gaussian distribution" Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777 1855) number of counts 1 Pn ( x) e 2 ( xx) 2 2 2 Gaussian distribution: continuous physics 401 16

2 x 1 Pn ( x) e 2 ( xx) 2 2 2 Error in the mean is given as N number od events σ N, physics 401 17

Source of noisy signal 4.89855 5.25111 2.93382 4.31753 4.67903 3.52626 4.12001 2.93411 Expected value 5V Actual measured values physics 401 18

10 100 10 4 10 6

Result U x c N - standard deviation N number of samples For N=10 6 U=4.999±0.001 0.02% accuracy

Ag b decay 40 20 800 600 Model 108 Ag t 1/2 =157s 110 Ag t 1/2 =24.6s ExpDec2 Equation y = A1*exp(-x/t1) + A2*exp(-x/t2) + y0 Residuals 0 Count 400 200 Reduced Chi-Sqr 1.43698 Adj. R-Square 0.96716 Value Standard Error C y0 0.02351 0.95435 C A1 104.87306 12.77612 C t1 177.75903 18.44979 C A2 710.01478 25.44606 C t2 30.32479 1.6525-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) 0 0 200 400 600 800 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 t t y A1 exp A2 exp y t t 1 2 0 0-20 0 20 Residuals physics 401 21

40 Ag b decay Test 1. Fourier analysis 20 Residuals 0-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 No pronounced frequencies found 0-20 0 20 Residuals physics 401 22

40 20 Ag b decay Test 1. Autocorrelation function Residuals 0-20 0 50 100 150 time (s) Count 20 Model Gauss Equation y=y0 + (A/(w*sq rt(pi/2)))*exp(-2 *((x-xc)/w)^2) Reduced Chi-S 4.77021 qr Adj. R-Square 0.93464 Value Standard Error Counts y0 1.44204 0.48702 Counts xc 1.49992 0.19171 Counts w 5.93398 0.40771 Counts A 219.24559 14.47587 Counts sigma 2.96699 Counts FWHM 6.98673 Counts Height 29.4798 Correlation function M 1 y( m) f ( n) g( n m) n0 0-20 0 20 Residuals autocorrelation function M 1 y( m) f ( n) f ( n m) n0 physics 401 23

Ag b decay Clear experiment Data + noise t 1 (s) 177.76 145.89 t 2 (s) 30.32 27.94 physics 401 24

Ag b decay Histogram does not follow the normal distribution and there is frequency of 0.333 is present in spectrum physics 401 25

Ag b decay Autocorrelation function Conclusion: fitting function should be modified by adding an additional term: t t y( t) y A exp A exp A3 sin( t ) t t 0 1 2 1 2 physics 401 26

FFT autocorrelation Clear experiment Data + noise Modified fitting t 1 (s) 177.76 145.89 172.79 t 2 (s) 30.32 27.94 30.17 physics 401 27

time In general we could expect both components of errors Q meas = Q true + e s + e r e s - systematic error comes from uncertainties of plates separation distance, applied DC voltage, ambient temperature etc. V =V DC ±DV, d=d 0 ±Dd e r - random errors are related to uncertainty of the knowledge of the actual t g and t rise. Uncertainty of time of crossing the marker line. It is random. physics 401 28

Q F S T 1 9d Systematic error 3 2 x 3 2 fc V g t t g g t rise 3 1 1 1 F 1 t g 1 32 f c g 1 2 S 3 3 9d 2 x 1 1 1 T V g t t g g t rise 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 dq dq dq dq dq DQ F S T S T df D D D D D ds dt ds dt ) ) ) ) ) 2 2 2 2 2 2 DS DT FT ) DS ) FS ) DT ) Q S T 10/1/2018 Physics 401 29

Systematic error 2 2 DS DT DQ Q S T 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 DS Dd DV 3 Dx 3 D 1 D 1 Dg Dd 3 Dx S d V 2 x 2 2 2 g d 2 x 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 DT Dt Dt t t t t t 2 2 5 2 3 2 g 1 2 2 rise g g rise g rise 10/1/2018 Physics 401 30

Step 1. Origin Project For Raw Data : \\engr-file-03\phyinst\apl Courses\PHYCS401\Students\2. Millikan Raw Data All these projects with raw data should be stored in: \\engr-file-03\phyinst\apl Courses\PHYCS401\Students\ 2. Millikan Raw Data Here should only the files with raw data but not other files which you using for calculations. All other files you can save in your personal folder physics 401 31

Step 2. Working on personal Origin project Make a copy of the Millikan1 project to your personal folder and open it Prepare equations calculations of data in next columns (Set column values ). Switch Recalculate in Auto mode Paste these 5 parameters and raw data from Section L1-L4.opj projects Calculate manually the actual air viscosity physics 401 32

Millikan oil drop experiment Step 3. Histogram graph First use the data from the column with drop charges and plot the histogram physics 401 33

Step 4. Histogram. Bin size Origin will automatically but not optimally adjust the bin size h. In tis page figure h=0.5. There are several theoretical approaches how to find the optimal bin size. 3. 5σ h = n 1/3 Is the sample standard deviation and n is total number of observation. For presented in Fig.1 results good value of h ~0.1 Millikan oil drop experiment h=5 physics 401 34

Step 4. Histogram. Bin size Millikan oil drop experiment To change the bin size click on graph and unplug the Automatic Binning option Bin size in this histogram is 0.1 physics 401 35

Step 4. Find the bin Worksheet Millikan oil drop experiment Right click on histogram and choose Go to Bin Worksheet. physics 401 36

Step 5. Add Counts vs bin plot physics 401 37

Step 5. Multipeak Gaussian fitting Millikan oil drop experiment This plot can be used for peak fitting. physics 401 38

Step 5. Multipeak Gaussian Fitting For 1 st peak x c ~0.882±0.007 physics 401 39

(x i,y i ) is an experimental data array. x i is an independent variable and y i - dependent f(x,b) is a model function and b is the vector of fitting (adjustable) parameters The goal of the fitting procedure is to find the set of parameters which will generate the function f closest to the experimental points. To reach this goal we will try to minimize the sum of squared deviation function (S): m i1 b 2 S( b) y f ( x, ) i i physics 401 40

The goal of fitting is not only to find the curve best matching the experimental data but also to find the corresponding parameters which in majority cases are the important physical parameters There are several known mathematical algorithms for optimizing these parameters but in general the fitting procedure could have not only unique solution and the choice of initial parameters is very important issue m i1 b 2 S( b) y f ( x, ) i i physics 401 41

b i 1 40 b i 2 S(bi) 20 0 Local minimum Main minimum 0 20 40 bi Let we have the S function dependent on parameter b i as shown on this graph physics 401 42