Method of estimating the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of the absorbing structure composed of different plane porous materials

Similar documents
Noise in enclosed spaces. Phil Joseph

PAPER. Kazutoshi Fujimoto 1; and Ken Anai 2;y 1. INTRODUCTION

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF OSCAR EVO-PANELS

Basic Study on a Laboratory Measurement Method of the Normal-Incidence Scattering Coefficient

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Summary. The basic principles of the simulation technique SERT

FDTD analysis on the sound insulation performance of wall system with narrow gaps

Directional distribution of acoustic energy density incident to a surface under reverberant condition

Test Report. RI Acoustic Lab. Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier. 20 Feb. 07

S. OIE and R. TAKEUCHI: FLEXIBLE PLATE WITH POROUS LAYERS MOUNTED

Estimation of the area effect of sound absorbent surfaces by using a boundary integral equation

A discussion on the uncertainty of absorption characteristics measured by ensemble averaging technique for room acoustics simulations

THE DEPENDENCE OF SOUND ABSORPTION BY AN ISOLATED ACOUSTIC RESONATOR ON THE RESONATOR S VOLUME

Acoustic response in non-diffuse rooms

An integrated approach to Acoustics - sound propagation and the phenomena affecting it

Introduction to Acoustics Exercises

DELTA Test Report. DANAK TEST Reg. no Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for Kvadrat Soft Cells Wall Panel Type Time

Engineering Noise Control

Sound radiation and sound insulation

SIMPLE APPLICATION OF STI-METHOD IN PREDICTING SPEECH TRANSMISSION IN CLASSROOMS. Jukka Keränen, Petra Larm, Valtteri Hongisto

THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION OF CLASSICTONE 700 ASTM C Type E Mounting. Test Number 2

Witold MIKULSKI. Central Institute for Labour Protection National Research Institute Czerniakowska 16, Warszawa, Poland;

unit 4 acoustics & ultrasonics

TIME DOMAIN LARGE-SCALE FINITE ELEMENT SOUND FIELD ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-PURPOSE HALL. 700 Dannoharu Oita, Japan

Development of a small-scale reverberation room

Excess sound absorption at normal incidence by two microperforated panel absorbers with different impedance

ACOUSTIC ABSORBENT PANELS WITH LOW PERFORATION COEFFICIENT.

Investigations on real-scale experiments for the measurement of the ISO scattering coefficient in the reverberation room

Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck

Department of Applied Acoustics, Salford University, Salford M5 4WT, England

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

Measurement of sound absorption coefficient for Fraster felt SpaceCover

ISO 354 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room

EFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS

Recent topics in acoustic scattering coefficient determination for wall surfaces

COMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STAND- ARD MICROPHONE

Users Manual. Marshall Day Acoustics. Double Panels Contact 33 Details Marshall Day 37.8 Acoustics PO Box

The diagram below. to the by the. outlet into. calculation. Since TRANSMISSION VIA STRUCTURE. Vibration Via Supports Duct Breakout

Experimental and numerical studies on reverberation characteristics in a rectangular room with unevenly distributed absorbers

Evaluation of standards for transmission loss tests

45º CONGRESO ESPAÑOL DE ACÚSTICA 8º CONGRESO IBÉRICO DE ACÚSTICA EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SMART CITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACOUSTICS

ROOM RESONANCES USING WAVE BASED GEOMET- RICAL ACOUSTICS (WBGA)

DELTA Test Report. Measurement of sound absorption coefficient for 15 mm Fraster felt Plus acoustic panels with mounting depth 45 mm

Micro-perforated sound absorbers in stretched materials

The effect of an edge on the measured scattering coefficients in a reverberation chamber based on ISO

DESIGN OF MICRO-PERFORATED ABSORBERS (MPA)

Verification of Sound Absorption Characteristics Constituted Porous Structure

ACOUSTIC INTRINSIC PERFORMANCES OF NOISE BARRIERS: ACCURACY OF IN SITU MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

A simple model for estimating excess attenuation of road traffic noise

D. BARD, J. NEGREIRA DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ACOUSTICS, LUND UNIVERSITY

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 24MM TESTED WITH NO AIR GAP MEASURED IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

Sound radiation and transmission. Professor Phil Joseph. Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015

Qualitative behaviour of L1 and L2 standard deviation in insulations measurements according to standard UNE EN ISO 140-4

New techniques in computer aided noise abatement for workplaces next to machinery Wolfgang Probst

Transmission loss of rectangular silencers using meso-porous and micro-perforated linings

Cepstral Deconvolution Method for Measurement of Absorption and Scattering Coefficients of Materials

Ecophon Acoustic Calculator. Accurate values in advance

INTER-NOISE AUGUST 2007 ISTANBUL, TURKEY

n v molecules will pass per unit time through the area from left to

INFLUENCE OF TIME-VARIANCE IN AUDITORIUM ON IMPULSE RESPONSE MEASUREMENT

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation

REPORT N CR

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

In situ estimation of acoustic impedance on the surfaces of realistic interiors: an inverse approach

Research Article A Mathematical Images Group Model to Estimate the Sound Level in a Close-Fitting Enclosure

EE1.el3 (EEE1023): Electronics III. Acoustics lecture 18 Room acoustics. Dr Philip Jackson.

Improvement of the Delany-Bazley and Miki models for fibrous sound-absorbing materials

19 th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ACOUSTICS MADRID, 2-7 SEPTEMBER 2007 OPTIMAL SPACE-TIME FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEMES FOR EXPERIMENTAL BOOTH DESIGN

Sound Engineering Test and Analysis

Experimental approach on natural frequency of window vibration induced by low frequency sounds

Benefits of Reduced-size Reverberation Room Testing

Technical Note. Measurement of Sound Absorption for Flex Acoustics AqTube. Performed for Flex Acoustics. TC Project no.: T Page 1 of 7

DELTA Test Report. Measurement of Sound Absorption for AqFlex ON, one Sample as a discrete Object. Performed for Flex Acoustics

ACOUSTICS 1.01 Pantone 144 U & Pantone 5405 U

Using an ambisonic microphone for measurement of the diffuse state in a reverberant room

Numerical analysis of sound insulation performance of double-layer wall with vibration absorbers using FDTD method

Absorption boundary conditions for geometrical acoustics

Testing Procedure: AS ISO

Laboratory and In Situ Sound Absorption Measurement under a Synthetized Diffuse Acoustic Field: a Case Study on Five Materials

A DIFFUSION MODEL FOR UWB INDOOR PROPAGATION. Majid A. Nemati and Robert A. Scholtz. University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA

ETS-LINDGREN ACOUSTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICIAL LABORATORY REPORT ARL-SA6712/ARL-SA6713 Revision 0 ARL

Using windscreens to improve the efficiency of noise barriers in wind: finite-difference time-domain simulations

FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA

ETS-LINDGREN ACOUSTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICIAL LABORATORY REPORT ARL-SA6266/ARL-SA6274 Revision 0 ARL

series KAT Acoustic air transfer units

CONSOLIDATED GRANULAR MEDIA FOR SOUND INSULATION: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THROUGH DIFFERENT METHODS

Oblique incidence sound absorption of parallel arrangement. of multiple micro-perforated panel absorbers in a periodic. pattern

Electromagnetic Absorption by Metamaterial Grating System

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

LINEAR SOURCES WITH NON-LINEAR DISTRIBUTION OF SOUND ENERGY. Miroslav Kučera, Richard Nový, Jiří Bašta

BEYOND SABINE: INVESTIGATING THE ACOUSTICAL PHENOMENON OF REVERBERATION USING ROOM MODAL DECAY

ISSUES ON THE REVERBERATION ROOM METHOD FOR MEASURING THE SCATTERING COEFFICIENTS -BORTHER SETTING AND REVOLUTION OF TEST SAMPLE-

ETS-LINDGREN ACOUSTIC RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICIAL LABORATORY REPORT ARL-SA6986/ARL-SA6987 Revision 0 ARL

LABORATORY MEASUREMENT OF SOUND ABSORPTION OF SONOGLASS SPRAY-ON TREATMENT IN THREE CONFIGURATIONS

Physics 115 Lecture 20. Reflection and Reverberation March 9, 2018

Acoustic design of lightweight cabin walls for cruise ships

Transcription:

J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 1, 1 (1980) Method of estimating the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of the absorbing structure composed of different plane porous materials Kyoji Fujiwara and Yasuo Makita Department of Acoustic Design, Kyushu Institute of Design, 226 Shiobaru, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 815 Japan (Received 11 May 1979) A method of estimating the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of an absorbing structure composed of several different plane porous materials without measurements in a reverberation room is studied. It is found that the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of this structure may be calculated in terms of the acoustic parameters of the constituent materials, their shapes, the mounting conditions and the dimensions of the room. The validity of the method is verified by experiments. PACS number: 43. 55. Dt, 43. 55. Ev 1. INTRODUCTION An absorbing structure composed of several different porous materials is often utilized as a means of adjustment of the reverberation time and reduction of the sound pressure level in a room. The reverberant sound absorption coefficient of the absorbing structure varies to a large extent with its mounting condition. Therefore, the reverberant sound absorption coefficients of test pieces of absorbing structures with specific mounting conditions have to be measured in a reverberation room. The lack of data of reverberant sound absorption coefficients results from this troublesome procedure of the measurement and diminishes the freedom of choice of absorbing structure in the acoustic design of a room. The present authors have studied the method of calculation of the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of an absorbing structure composed of single plane porous material.1-3) The aim of this paper is to make it possible to calculate the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of an absorbing structure composed of several different plane porous materials in terms of the acoustic properties of the constituent materials, their shapes, the mounting conditions and the dimensions of the room without measuring it in a reverberation room. 2. ANALYSIS BY THE GEOMETRICAL THEORY 2.1 Absorbing Structure Composed of n Different Plane Porous Materials Placed Adjacent Side by Side The geometry of an absorbing structure composed of n different plane porous materials placed adjacent side by side is shown in Fig. 1. Each constituent material, for example, the material i is mounted at an average distance hi from the wall of the reverberation room. When the back space of the materials is not partitioned (hereafter, let this case be Case A), the space in the room is assumed to be virtually separated into (n+1) parts; space 0, i and the projected area of this material on the wall and has volume Vi. When the back space of the materials is partitoined (hereafter, let this case be Case B), space i is the space enclosed by the material

J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 1, 1 (1980) where E0 and Ei are the sound energy densities in space 0 and i respectively; W is the sound power of a source placed in space 0; a0j and aij are constants determined by the physical parameters of each space and its boundaries, but when space i is not adjacent to space j, aij is zero. Being solved Eq. (1), i.e., the simultaneous differential equations with constant coefficients, the decaying process of energy density in space 0 is given as follows. (2) where Fig. 1 Geometry of an absorbing structure constructed in a reverberation room. the partitions and the wall and has volume Vi. Space 0 is the remaining space of the room in both cases mentioned above and has volume V0. The case where Case A and Case B are mixed is also able to be treated, though very complex. According as the material is mounted at a distance from the wall, the sound field in the back space of the material takes three different states; (a) when the material is mounted far from the wall, the diffusivity and the sound energy density in the back space are almost equal to those in space 0, (b) when the material is a little nearer to the wall, the sound field in the back space is almost diffuse as well as in space 0, but the sound energy density in the back space is different from that in space 0, (c) when the material is quite near to the wall, the sound field in the back space is coherent and the material is in it. This section is concerned with the states (a) and (b), the third one will be discussed in the next chapter. In the two states (a) and (b), the sound fields in hij are given by the following simultaneous equations being solved, provided that h0j is equal to unity, are the roots of following equation, diffuse. Hence the relation between sound energy E00 is the energy density of space 0 at steady state, densities in each space and their time rates of increase may be expressed by the following simul- and Hi0 is the ratio of the steady state energy density of space i, E0i to E00, viz., taneous differential equations, Hi0=E0i/E00 (1)

K. FUJIWARA and Y. MAKITA: REVERBERANT SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT For example, let the case where two different (i,j=0,1,2) are given by In the case where the source is in space 0, the following inequality holds for normal mounting condition of materials, and the Eq. (2) is approximated to The reverberation time in space 0 is obtained as (5) (8) Inserting the value of T into the following equation yields the reverberant sound absorption coefficient (6) where rmi is the sound energy fraction reflected by fraction absorbed by the material i for random i to the wall, Swij is the area of the boundary surface between the spaces i and j except for the area of the material, Smi is the one side area of the where V is the summation of the volume Vi (i= material i. When spaces 1 and 2 are separated from space 0 by the partition which the sound energy sound velocity. T is the reverberation time when does not penetrate as shown in Fig. 2, i.e., Case B, the room is empty, and sound absorption coefficient of the surface of the bare room, S is the inner surface area of the bare room and V is the total volume of the room. (9) Fig. 2 Geometry of an absorbing structure composed of two different materials when the backing condition is Case B. efficient of the partition between space 0 and spaces 1 and 2. When space 1 is insulated from space 2 by changed to 39

tively by efficient of the partition between spaces 1 and 2. (10) J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 1, 1 (1980) Firstly, the absorbing structure of two different materials, i.e, material i and material j as shown in Fig. 4, is considered for simplicity. When the sound is incident on the front side of this structure, the effective energy fractions reflected and absorbed 2.2 Multi-layer Absorbing Structure This section is concerned with the case where n different materials are used as a multi-layer absorbing structure. It is assumed that the thickness of this structure is very thin compared with the length of perimeter of this structure and this structure behaves as a thin material. The multi-layer absorbing structure of n different materials under consideration is shown in Fig. 3. n from upper side of this structure. The notations reflected and absorbed by the material i respectively in the case where the sound is incident on the front side of this material (upper side in Fig. 3), and rmib reflected and absorbed by the material i respectively in the case where the sound is incident on the back side of this material. (11) (12) When the sound is incident on the back side of this structure, the effective energy fractions reflected Fig. 3 Geometry of a multi-layer absorbing structure. (13) (14) When the multi-layer absorbing structure of n Fig. 4 Process of the reflection and transmission in the multi-layer absorbing structure composed of two different materials. (14) are calculated for each pair of adjacent differ- obtained by the above calculations as parameters of composite materials of respective pair materials, we continue the same procedure recurrently until the effective energy fractions reflected and absorbed of the multi-layer absorbing structure are 40

K. FUJIWARA and Y. MAKITA: REVERBERANT SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENT obtained. If n is odd, one of the materials of outside layer is kept out of consideration and the above procedure is applied to (n-1) different materials. From the obtained effective energy fractions reflected and absorbed of (n-1) different materials and those of the remaining material, the effective energy fractions reflected and absorbed of n multi-layer absorbing structure are obtained finally. 3. CORRECTION BY THE WAVE THEORY 3.1 Correction for the Lack of Uniformity of the Energy Distribution in the Field near to the Wall It is shown by Waterhouse4) that the sound energy is distributed into interference patterns near the reflecting boundaries in a reverberation room. The third state mentioned in the previous chapter is the state when the absorbing material is mounted in the sound field of the interference patterns. In this state, the results obtained by the geometrical theory in the previous chapter should be corrected. (A) The case of pure tone incidence: The potential energy distribution when the absorbing material i is in the sound field near to the wall is given by Fig. 5 Correction term Kn as a function of the distance h. The center frequency of band noise is 500Hz. ćmi+Ďdi=0.9. The solid curve in Fig. 5 shows the numerical example of Eq. (17) when (ćmi+Ďdi)=0.9. (B) The case of band noise incidence: The reverberant sound absorption coefficient is usually measured by the use of band noise. Therefore, Eqs. (15) and (16) must be averaged over the band width of noise. The potential and kinetic energy distributions for band noises are given as follows. and the kinetic energy distribution is given by1) (15) (18) (16) The fraction of sound energy propagated in a porous absorbing material is transformed into heat energy in proportion to the square of particle velocity, i.e., the kinetic energy of the sound. Therefore, the absorbed energy fraction Ďdi' in the field near to the wall is given by Ďdi being multiplied by the ratio of the kinetic energy to the total energy at the position of material; (17) (19) where (k2-k1) is the band width of noise. And then the correction term Kn for the band noise is given by (20) Figure 5 shows the numerical examples of Eq. (20). The dashed curve shows the case when the band width is one-third octave band, and chain curve shows the case when the band width is one octave band. 41

J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 1, 1 (1980) (C) Influence of the phase delay of sound in the material: The correction term K given in the previous subsection (A) was obtained by the phase delay of reflected sound wave in the material being neglected.1) Here, the influence of this phase delay on the correction term is considered. When the sound passes through a sheet-type porous material, let the phase angle lagging behind the sound which would not pass through the material be ƒõ (degree). Although this angle depends slightly upon the incident angle of sound, it is assumed to be constant for simplicity. Then, the potential and kinetic energy distributions are given by Fig. 7 Geometry of the material not parallel to the wall. chain curve correspond to the cases where the phase delay angles ƒõ are 0, 10 and 30 respectively. (D) Application to the case where the material is set up not parallel to the wall: When the material i is set up on the wall with an angle ƒæi as shown (21) in Fig. 7, the correction term K must be averaged over the area of the material because the kinetic energy distribution over the area of the material is not uniform, and the energy absorbed by a small part of the material is effected by the kinetic energy density at the point where the small part exists. Then the correction term KƒÆi for this case is given by And the correction term KƒÕ is given as follows, (22) where dƒð is the area of small part of the material as a function of h. (24) (23) 3.2 Correction for the Edge Effect Figure 6 shows the numerical examples of the correction term KƒÕ. The solid curve, dashed curve and Fig. 6 Correction term KƒÕ as a function of the distance h. The frequency of incident sound wave is 500Hz. ƒámi+ƒédi=0.9. (A) Energy discontinuity in the field near to the edge of material: The edge effect is a phenomenon caused by the diffraction of sound around the edge of the material. This diffraction may be regarded as the phenomenon which arises from the nature of sound field to reduce the discontinuity of energy density distribution near to the edge. Therefore the amount of this diffraction may be assumed to be proportional to the degree of the discontinuity in the energy density distribution. When a plane sound wave is incident on a boundary line between two different materials as shown in Fig. 8, according to the geometrical theory the reflected sound wave from the material i is in the left side region of the dashed line (side Ai), and the reflected sound wave from the material j is in the right side region of the dashed line (side Aj). There exists the discontinuity of sound energy density or the discontinuity of sound intensity between these two sound fields in side Ai and side Aj. Let the 42