Forcing of anthropogenic aerosols on temperature trends of the subthermocline

Similar documents
Supplement of Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze pollution in Beijing

S16. ASSESSING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF EAST AFRICAN AND WEST PACIFIC WARMING TO THE 2014 BOREAL SPRING EAST AFRICAN DROUGHT

Twenty-first-century projections of North Atlantic tropical storms from CMIP5 models

Evaluation of CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and TOA Radiation Budgets in the SMLs Using NASA Satellite Observations

Supplemental Material for

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The final push to extreme El Ninõ

Supplementary Figure 1 A figure of changing surface air temperature and top-1m soil moisture: (A) Annual mean surface air temperature, and (B) top

Supplementary Information for Impacts of a warming marginal sea on torrential rainfall organized under the Asian summer monsoon

Future freshwater stress for island populations

Future change in the frequency and intensity of wintertime North Pacific blocking in CMIP5 models

Decadal shifts of East Asian summer monsoon in a climate. model free of explicit GHGs and aerosols

Heat and Carbon Uptake by the Southern Ocean: Joint U.S. CLIVAR/OCB Working Group

Desert Amplification in a Warming Climate

Global Warming Attenuates the. Tropical Atlantic-Pacific Teleconnection

Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target

Supplemental material

Changes in the El Nino s spatial structure under global warming. Sang-Wook Yeh Hanyang University, Korea

Supporting Information for Relation of the double-itcz bias to the atmospheric energy budget in climate models

Geophysical Research Letters. Supporting Information for. Ozone-induced climate change propped up by the Southern Hemisphere oceanic front

Supplementary Figure 1 Observed change in wind and vertical motion. Anomalies are regime differences between periods and obtained

Decreased monsoon precipitation in the Northern Hemisphere due to anthropogenic aerosols

Snow occurrence changes over the central and eastern United States under future. warming scenarios

INVESTIGATING THE SIMULATIONS OF HYDROLOGICAL and ENERGY CYCLES OF IPCC GCMS OVER THE CONGO AND UPPER BLUE NILE BASINS

Early benefits of mitigation in risk of regional climate extremes

Research Article Detecting Warming Hiatus Periods in CMIP5 Climate Model Projections

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Climate Change Scenario, Climate Model and Future Climate Projection

9.1.2 Climate Projections

Significant anthropogenic-induced changes. of climate classes since 1950

Contents of this file

Enhanced warming of the subtropical mode water in the North Pacific and North Atlantic

Correction notice. Nature Climate Change 2, (2012)

Recent Walker circulation strengthening and Pacific cooling amplified by Atlantic warming

SPREP. Chapter 5 Fiji Islands

Chapter 2 Cook Islands

Hydrological Sensitivity in W m 2 K 1 (% K 1 ) a. BCC_csm1.1*# Beijing Climate Center, China (2.49)

Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation

Climate Impacts Projections

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Karonga Climate Profile: Full Technical Version

Supporting Information for. [Strong dependence of U.S. summertime air quality on the decadal variability of Atlantic sea surface temperatures]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Jill Key. Chapter 11 Papua New Guinea

Interannual Variability of the Winter North Atlantic Storm Track in CMIP5 Models

Update on Cordex-AustralAsia domain

Robust Arctic sea-ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past decades

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Causes of Robust Seasonal Land Precipitation Changes*

Evaluating the Formation Mechanisms of the Equatorial Pacific SST Warming Pattern in CMIP5 Models

Supplementary Figure S1: Uncertainty of runoff changes Assessments of. R [mm/yr/k] for each model and the ensemble mean.

Attribution of observed historical near-surface temperature variations to anthropogenic and natural causes using CMIP5 simulations

Experiments with Statistical Downscaling of Precipitation for South Florida Region: Issues & Observations

The importance of ENSO phase during volcanic eruptions for detection and attribution

Climate model simulations of the observed early-2000s hiatus of global warming

Projected strengthening of Amazonian dry season by constrained climate model simulations

Supplementary Figure 1 Current and future distribution of temperate drylands. (a b-f b-f

Realism of the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 Models: The Implications for Climate Projections

Impacts of Climate Change on Surface Water in the Onkaparinga Catchment

Did Climate Change Induced Rainfall Trends Contribute to the Australian Millennium Drought?

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

More extreme precipitation in the world s dry and wet regions

Effects of a Warming Climate on Daily Snowfall Events in the Northern Hemisphere

Southern Hemisphere jet latitude biases in CMIP5 models linked to shortwave cloud forcing

The Implication of Ural Blocking on the East Asian Winter Climate in CMIP5 Models

EXPERT MEETING TO ASSESS PROGRESS MADE IN THE PROCESS TO FORMULATE AND IMPLEMENT ANATIONAL ADAPTATION PANS (NAPs)

what do global climate models say about increasing variance in the california current upwelling ecosystem

NARCliM Technical Note 1. Choosing GCMs. Issued: March 2012 Amended: 29th October Jason P. Evans 1 and Fei Ji 2

Supplementary Material for On the evaluation of climate model simulated precipitation extremes

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

1" 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 7" 8" 9" 10" 11" 12" 13" 14" 15" 16" 17" 18" 19" 20" 21" 22" 23" 24" 25" 26" 27" 28" 29" 30" 31" 32" 33" 34" 35"

Beyond IPCC plots. Ben Sanderson

Climate data and scenarios for Canada: Synthesis of recent observation and modelling results

A revival of Indian summer monsoon rainfall since 2002

Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Precipitation over Lake Victoria, East Africa, in the 21st Century

Projections of heavy rainfall over the central United States based on CMIP5 models

Contents of this file

Ocean carbon cycle feedbacks in the tropics from CMIP5 models

The 20th century warming and projections for the 21st century climate in the region of the Ukrainian Antarctic station Akademik Vernadsky

Statistical downscaling of multivariate wave climate using a weather type approach

Reconciling the Observed and Modeled Southern Hemisphere Circulation Response to Volcanic Eruptions Supplemental Material

Because water vapor is the principal greenhouse gas, variations

PUBLICATIONS. Geophysical Research Letters

Multi-model climate change scenarios for southwest Western Australia and potential impacts on streamflow

Supplementary Information for:

Climate Outlook for March August 2017

Nairobi Climate Profile: Full Technical Version

Evaluation of the CMIP5 Decadal Hindcasts in the State of California

LU DONG TIANJUN ZHOU. (Manuscript received 3 July 2013, in final form 16 January 2014) ABSTRACT

Intercomparison of temperature trends in IPCC CMIP5 simulations with observations, reanalyses and CMIP3 models

SST forcing of Australian rainfall trends

ENSO and annual cycle interaction: the combination mode representation in CMIP5 models

Indian Ocean Dipole Response to Global Warming in the CMIP5 Multimodel Ensemble*

Pacific-North American teleconnection and North Pacific Oscillation: historical simulation and future projection in CMIP5 models

Projected change in extreme rainfall events in China by the end of the 21st century using CMIP5 models

Detectability of Changes in the Walker Circulation in Response to Global Warming*

Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO 2 fertilization

Supplemental Material

Climate Outlook for December 2015 May 2016

SUPPLEMENT EXPLAINING EXTREME EVENTS OF 2016 FROM A CLIMATE PERSPECTIVE

Transcription:

Forcing of anthropogenic aerosols on temperature trends of the subthermocline southern Indian Ocean Tim Cowan* 1,2, Wenju Cai 1, Ariaan Purich 1, Leon Rotstayn 1 and Matthew H. England 2 1 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia 2 Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Climate System Science, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia. *Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.C. (Tim.Cowan@csiro.au) Supplementary tables and figures

Table S1 CMIP5 coupled models used in this study. Institution Model(s) Historic Dedrifted Commonwealth Scientific and ACCESS10 Industrial Research ACCESS13 Organization (CSIRO) & Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) Beijing Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration (bcc) College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University (BNU) Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model Contributors (NSFDOENCAR) Centro EuroMediterraneo per I Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC) Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques / Centre Européen de Recherche et Formation Avancée en Calcul Scientifique (CNRMCERFACS) CSIRO & Queensland Climate Change Centre of Excellence (QCCCE) Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (g2 & s2) and CESS,Tsinghua University (g2 only) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (NOAAGFDL) NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) Met Office Hadley Centre National Institute of Meteorological Research/Korea Meteorological Administration bcccsm11 bcccsm11m RCP4.5 (to 2099) BNUESM CanESM2 CCSM4 CESM1BGC CESM1CAM5 CESM1CAM51FV2 CESM1FASTCHEM CESM1WACCM CMCCCESM CMCCCM CMCCCMS CNRMCM5 RCP8.5 (to 2099) * * CSIROMk3.6 * FGOALSg2 FGOALSs2 GFDLCM2p1 GFDLCM3 GFDLESM2G GFDLESM2M GISSE2H GISSE2R HadCM3 HadGEM2CC HadGEM2ES HadGEM2AO * * * * *

Institution Model(s) Historic Dedrifted Institut PierreSimon Laplace IPSLCM5ALR (IPSL) IPSLCM5AMR Japan Agency for MarineEarth Science and Technology, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (The University of Tokyo), and National Institute for Environmental Studies Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute (The University of Tokyo), National Institute for Environmental Studies, and Japan Agency for MarineEarth Science and Technology Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI) IPSLCM5BLR MIROCESM MIROCESMCHEM MIROC4h MIROC5 MPIESMLR MPIESMMR MPIESMP RCP4.5 (to 2099) RCP8.5 (to 2099) * * * Meteorological Research MRICGCM3 * Institute (MRI) Norwegian Climate Centre NorESM1M NorESM1ME * These models also have 550 nm aerosol optical depth (AOD) data for historical and RCP8.5 periods

CMIP 3 CMIP5 Table S2: Individual forcings runs from CMIP5 and CMIP3 (in italics) coupled models. Experiments Model All AA NoAA GHG Nat AsAA RCP4.5 RCP8.5 CanESM2 5 5 5 5 1 1 CSIROMk3.6 10 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 GFDL CM3 5 3 2 3 1 1 GISSE2R 6 5 5 5 1 1 IPSL CM5A LR 3 1 4 6 3 1 1 GFDLCM2.1 5 3 3 3 PCM1 3 4 4 4 Total no. models 7 7 2 7 7 1 5 5 Total no. runs 37 26 9 30 28 5 5 5

Figure S1 Observed zonalmean linear subsurface temperature trends for the Indian Ocean. Zonallyaveraged linear trends over 19601999 of subsurface temperature in the southern tropical and subtropical Indian Ocean (40 E110 E), based on observational estimates from: (a) Indian Ocean Thermal Archive (IOTA), (b) Levitus temperature from the World Ocean Database 2009 (Levitus09), (c) Ishii temperature assimilation (Ishii09), and (d) Simple Ocean Data Assimilation Parallel Ocean Program version 2.2.4 (SODAPOP_V2.2.4). Trend units are C 40years 1. The Levitus09 observations are confined to the upper 700 m only. Significant trends at the 95% confidence level, based on a t test, are shown within the contours for (b)(d). For IOTA, no information on statistical significance was available at the time of writing.

Figure S2 Simulated (dedrifted) zonalmean linear subsurface temperature trends for each ocean basin. Zonallyaveraged linear trends over 19601999 of subsurface temperature in the SH tropical and subtropical ocean basins based on a 15 CMIP5 multimodel ensemble that has been dedrifted: (a) Atlantic Ocean, (b) Indian Ocean, (c) Pacific Ocean, and (d) global ocean. Trend units are C 40 years 1. Significant trends, greater than one standard deviation of the intermodel spread, are shown within the contours.

Figure S3 Simulated (dedrifted) zonalmean linear subsurface temperature trends for the southern IO for each model ensemble. Zonallyaveraged linear trends over 19601999 of subsurface temperature in the SH tropical and subtropical IO for each of the 15 CMIP5 models that have been dedrifted. Trend units are C 40years 1. Significant trends at the 95% confidence level, based on a t test, are shown within the contours. The number of model runs that make up each model ensemble is listed in the brackets in each panel title.

Figure S4 Average observed subthermocline temperature from the SH tropical and subtropical oceans. Mean subthermocline temperature from observational estimates for: (a) Atlantic Ocean (70 W20 E, 20 S40 S), (b) Indian Ocean (40 E110 E, 10 S30 S), (c) Pacific Ocean (120 E70 W, 10 S40 S), and (d) global ocean (10 S40 S). The depth over which the average is taken is 300900 m (except for Levitus09 which is 300700 m). The observational estimate average (black line) is based on an average of the four products: Levitus09, Ishii09m, SODAPOP V2.2.4, and Argo profiles (2005 2012). Note the different temperature axis scale used in (a)(d). All time series have been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean, except for the Argo measurements which show the interannual variability.

Figure S5 Significance of the simulated CMIP5 dedrifted MME time series. Comparison between the time series of subthermocline IO temperature from a 15CMIP5 dedrifted MME (blue line) and a 15CMIP5 MME preindustrial control period (200years; black line). The historical MME time series is shown five times, as a way to illustrate the historical change relative to the preindustrial MME. All time series have been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean.

Figure S6 Average simulated subthermocline temperature from the SH tropical and subtropical oceans. Mean subsurface temperature from CMIP5 multimodel ensembles estimates for: (a) Atlantic Ocean (70 W20 E, 10 S30 S), (b) Indian Ocean (40 E110 E, 15 S35 S), (c) Pacific Ocean (120 E70 W, 15 S40 S), and (d) global ocean (15 S35 S). The depth over which the average is taken is 300900 m. The simulated estimates include a 42 CMIP5 historical MME (blue line), a 15 CMIP5 historical dedrifted MME (green line), a 26 CMIP5 RCP4.5 MME (orange line), and a 16 CMIP5 RCP8.5 MME (red line). All time series are shown as annual values, except for the observation averages (black line) which have been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean.

Figure S7 Average simulated subthermocline temperature from individual CMIP5 and CMIP3 models for the southern IO. Mean subthermocline IO temperature from model individual forcing runs (based on Table 2) for five CMIP5 models: (a) CanESM2, (b) CSIROMk3.6, (c) IPSLCM5ALR, (d) GFDLCM3, (e) GISSE2R; and two CMIP3 models: (f) GFDLCM2.1, and (g) NCARPCM1. The region of interest is 40 E110 E, 15 S35 S, 300900 m. Please note, the vertical axis is different between the individual models. All time series have been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean.

Figure S8 Simulated zonalmean linear subsurface temperature trends for each ocean basin induced by greenhouse gases (GHG) only. Zonallyaveraged linear trends over 19601999 of subsurface temperature in the SH tropical and subtropical ocean basins based on a MME of five CMIP5 and two CMIP3 models forced only by GHGs, for: (a) Atlantic Ocean, (b) Indian Ocean, (c) Pacific Ocean, and (d) global ocean. Trend units are C 40years 1. Significant trends, greater than one standard deviation of the intermodel spread, are shown within the contours.

Figure S9 Same as Figure S8, but for models forced by anthropogenic aerosols (AA) only.

Figure S10 Average simulated subthermocline temperature from individual forcing runs. Mean subthermocline temperature from model individual forcing runs (based on Table 2) for: (a) Atlantic Ocean (70 W20 E, 10 S30 S), (b) Indian Ocean (40 E110 E, 15 S35 S), (c) Pacific Ocean (120 E 70 W, 15 S40 S), and (d) global ocean (15 S35 S). The depth over which the average is taken is 300900 m. The simulated annual estimates include a threemodel NoAA ensemble (red line), an eightmodel GHG ensemble (grey line), an eightmodel Nat ensemble (dark green line), a sevenmodel AA ensemble (blue line), a twomodel AsAA ensemble (light green line), a fivemodel All ensemble (maroon line), and fivemodel RCP4.5 (orange line) and RCP8.5 ensembles (pink line). The observational average (shown as an 11year running mean) is also shown (black line). All time series are shown as annual values, except for the observation average which has been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean.

Figure S11 Linear trends over 19601999 of wind stress curl (contour) and wind stress (vectors) in the SH tropical and subtropical Indian Ocean based on a five CMIP5 multimodel ensemble forced only with: (a) wellmixed greenhouse gases and (b) anthropogenic aerosols only. Curl trend units are N m 3 40years 1, scaled by 10 6, while the wind stress reference vector is 0.01 N m 2 40years 1. Wind vectors that are black are those which are greater than the onestandard deviation of the intermodel spread.

Figure S12 Simulated southern Indian Ocean subthermocline temperature versus aerosol optical depth. Average temperature of the southern subthermocline IO (bottom plots; blue line) versus aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm averaged over the NH (top plots; black line) from 19502100 (based on historical and RCP8.5 experiments), as simulated by: (a) ACCESS1.0, (b) ACCESS1.3, (c) CSIROMk3.6, (d) GFDLCM3, (e) GFDLESM2G, (f) GISSE2R, (g) HadGEMCC, (h) HadGEMES, (i) IPSLCM5ALR, (j) MIROCESMCHEM, (k) MIROCESM, and (l) MRICGCM3. The blue (red) dots indicate the peak (trough) in NH AOD (IO subthermocline temperature). CSIROMk3.6, HadGEMES, IPSLCM5ALR are ensembles made up 10, four, and four runs, respectively, while the remaining models consist of one run only. All time series have been lowpass filtered using an 11year running mean. It should be noted that the IPSLCM5ALR model does not show an absolute IO minimum, so it is taken as the minimum prior to the multidecade warming post2010.

Figure S13 Average simulated subthermocline temperature from the southern IO with error bars. Mean subthermocline temperature for the IO (40 E110 E, 15 S35 S, 300900 m). The simulated annual estimates include a 42 CMIP5 historical MME (blue line) and a 15 CMIP5 historical dedrifted MME (green line). The annual observed average is also shown (black dotted line). The errorestimates are the 95% confidence interval, and are based on the statistics of 10 MMEs using one run selected randomly from each model, repeated 10 times to create the desired 10 member ensemble. For models with only one run, this run is used each time in the 10 model ensemble average.