Calculation of Franck-Condon factors and r-centroids using isospectral Hamiltonian approach

Similar documents
The rotating Morse potential energy eigenvalues solved by using the analytical transfer matrix method

arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 18 May 1998 Summary. - The strictly isospectral double Darboux method is applied to the quantum

Exactly Solvable Systems and the Quantum Hamilton Jacobi Formalism

New Shape Invariant Potentials in Supersymmetric. Quantum Mechanics. Avinash Khare and Uday P. Sukhatme. Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg,

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 2 Feb 2000

Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Supersymmetric Approach for Eckart Potential Using the NU Method

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Project: Vibration of Diatomic Molecules

Harmonic Oscillator Eigenvalues and Eigenfunctions

SIMPLE EVALUATION OF FRANCK-CONDON FACTORS AND NON-CONDON EFFECTS IN THE MORSE POTENTIAL

Polynomial Heisenberg algebras and higher order supersymmetry

Quantum Chemistry. NC State University. Lecture 5. The electronic structure of molecules Absorption spectroscopy Fluorescence spectroscopy

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 15 Dec 2011

Wavefunctions of the Morse Potential

Isospectrality of conventional and new extended potentials, second-order supersymmetry and role of PT symmetry

ASYMPTOTIC ITERATION METHOD APPLIED TO BOUND-STATE PROBLEMS WITH UNBROKEN AND BROKEN SUPERSYMMETRY

Energy Level Sets for the Morse Potential

Molecular spectroscopy Multispectral imaging (FAFF 020, FYST29) fall 2017

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 9 Jul 2009

The q-deformation of Hyperbolic and Trigonometric Potentials

Supersymmetrical Separation of Variables in Two-Dimensional Quantum Mechanics

Chaotic Scattering of Microwaves in Billiards: Induced Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking and Fluctuations in GOE and GUE Systems 2008

Supersymmetrization of Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics

Introduction to Vibrational Spectroscopy

Exact solutions of the radial Schrödinger equation for some physical potentials

Second-order SUSY partners of the trigonometric Pöschl-Teller potentials

Symmetries for fun and profit

Non-Hermitian CP-Symmetric Dirac Hamiltonians with Real Energy Eigenvalues

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 22 Jul 2007

Molecular orbitals, potential energy surfaces and symmetry

Sample Quantum Chemistry Exam 2 Solutions

Energy spectrum for a short-range 1/r singular potential with a nonorbital barrier using the asymptotic iteration method

Schrödinger Equation with Double- Cosine and Sine Squared Potential by Darboux Transformation Method and Supersymmetry

Hamiltonians with Position-Dependent Mass, Deformations and Supersymmetry

Quantum Chemistry Exam 2 Solutions

eigenvalues eigenfunctions

Quantum mechanics (QM) deals with systems on atomic scale level, whose behaviours cannot be described by classical mechanics.

Chem 452 Mega Practice Exam 1

Harmonic oscillator Wigner function extension to exceptional polynomials

Shape Invariant Potentials for Effective Mass Schrödinger Equation

wbt Λ = 0, 1, 2, 3, Eq. (7.63)

arxiv:math-ph/ v1 1 Sep 2004

PHOTO-DISSOCIATION OF CO 2 GAS BY USING TWO LASERS

Nuclear Reactions. Shape, interaction, and excitation structures of nuclei. scattered particles. detector. solid angle. target. transmitted particles

I 2 Vapor Absorption Experiment and Determination of Bond Dissociation Energy.

Solution of One-dimensional Dirac Equation via Poincaré Map

Higher-order exceptional points

On Franck-Condon Factors and Intensity Distributions in some Band Systems of I 2, NS and PS Molecules

University of Calabar, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. 2 Department of Chemistry, ModibboAdama University of Technology, Yola, Adamawa

( ) x10 8 m. The energy in a mole of 400 nm photons is calculated by: ' & sec( ) ( & % ) 6.022x10 23 photons' E = h! = hc & 6.

VALENCE Hilary Term 2018

Helsinki Winterschool in Theoretical Chemistry 2013

An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually).

QUANTUM CHEMISTRY PROJECT 2: THE FRANCK CONDON PRINCIPLE

arxiv:quant-ph/ v4 13 Jun 2006

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 2 Jan 2011

2. The Schrödinger equation for one-particle problems. 5. Atoms and the periodic table of chemical elements

Niklas Rehfeld. Universität Konstanz. Diploma Thesis Niklas Rehfeld p.1/21

The Sommerfeld Polynomial Method: Harmonic Oscillator Example

5.74 Introductory Quantum Mechanics II

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 5 Jul 2012

Supersymmetric quantum mechanics of the 2D Kepler problem

Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics of Scattering

Solving ground eigenvalue and eigenfunction of spheroidal wave equation at low frequency by supersymmetric quantum mechanics method

CHEM 301: Homework assignment #5

Symmetries and Supersymmetries in Trapped Ion Hamiltonian Models

Energy spectrum inverse problem of q-deformed harmonic oscillator and WBK approximation

Electron States of Diatomic Molecules

Time-dependent density functional theory

PHYS-454 The position and momentum representations

Darboux Transformations and Isospectral Potentials in Quantum Mechanics

Non Adiabatic Transitions in a Simple Born Oppenheimer Scattering System

Chemistry 2. Lecture 1 Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry

Laser Induced Fluorescence of Iodine

SUSY-inspired one-dimensional transformation optics

A few principles of classical and quantum mechanics

MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES. 4. Introduction to quantum treatments Outline of the principles and the method of quantum mechanics

Second Quantization Method for Bosons

Exact Propagators for Soliton Potentials

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 19 Apr 1996

Nonstandard Finite Difference Time Domain (NSFDTD) Method for Solving the Schrödinger Equation

Lecture 10 Diatomic Vibration Spectra Harmonic Model

Approximate eigenvalue and eigenfunction solutions for the generalized Hulthén potential with any angular momentum

Smilansky-Solomyak model with a δ -interaction

Molecular Bonding. Molecular Schrödinger equation. r - nuclei s - electrons. M j = mass of j th nucleus m 0 = mass of electron

Algebraic Study of Stretching and Bending Modes in Linear Tetra-atomic Molecules: HCCCl

EXACT SOLUTIONS OF THE KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION WITH HYLLERAAS POTENTIAL. Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Uyo-Nigeria.

Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Geometry by Nicholas Mee of Trinity College, Cambridge. October 1989

MO theory is better for spectroscopy (Exited State Properties; Ionization)

Spectroscopy and the Particle in a Box

COMPLEXIFIED PSUSY AND SSUSY INTERPRETATIONS OF SOME PT-SYMMETRIC HAMILTONIANS POSSESSING TWO SERIES OF REAL ENERGY EIGENVALUES

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 29 Mar 2003

3: Many electrons. Orbital symmetries. l =2 1. m l

Ayan Chattopadhyay Mainak Mustafi 3 rd yr Undergraduates Integrated MSc Chemistry IIT Kharagpur

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 9, February 8, 2006

Available online at WSN 89 (2017) EISSN

NPTEL/IITM. Molecular Spectroscopy Lectures 1 & 2. Prof.K. Mangala Sunder Page 1 of 15. Topics. Part I : Introductory concepts Topics

MSE 102, Fall 2014 Midterm #2. Write your name here [10 points]:

Transcription:

Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics Vol. 43, October 5, pp. 738-74 Calculation of Franck-Condon factors and r-centroids using isospectral Hamiltonian approach Anil Kumar & C Nagaraja Kumar* Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh 6 4 Received 5 April 5; accepted July 5 The calculation of Franck-Condon factors is of interest to study the vibrational transitions in diatomic molecules. Morse potential is one of the commonly used models for these calculations. Using isospectral Hamiltonian approach, a family of isospectral potentials, which have the same energy eigenvalues as that of Morse potential has been obtained. The eigenfunctions for this family of isospectral potentials are different from that of the original potential. The Franck-Condon factors and r-centroid values obtained using the deformed wavefunctions can be varied to match the experimental data. Keywords: Isospectral Hamiltonian, Franck-Condon factor, r-centroid IPC Code: G9B3/ Introduction The Franck-Condon (FC) principle is one of the central concepts in the description of transition probabilities between bound molecular states. This explains the spectral intensity distribution for the vibrational transitions between two different electronic states of a molecule. The quantum mechanical basis for the FC principle is the extent of overlap between the vibrational wavefunctions of the two electronic states. These factors give the molecular structure information required to evaluate the band intensities in emission and absorption. The calculation of FC factors is based on the model potential for which the Schrödinger equation can be solved -3. Morse potential 4 is one of the most realistic potential models. Energy eigenvalues and eigenfunction dependent quantities (like FC factors, values of r- centroids) can be calculated and compared with the corresponding experimental data. Consider the situation where the energy eigenvalues are in good agreement with experimental data and there is still room for improvement in FC factors agreement. In such a case, one would normally, add an additional term to the potential, which may spoil the agreement of energy eigenvalues already reached with the data. The strictly isospectral Hamiltonian approach has the advantage that without destroying the agreement already achieved between experimental and calculated energy eigenvalues, the wavefunction dependent quantities can be varied. We present the calculations *E-mail: cnkumar@pu.ac.in for FC factors and r-centroids using isospectral Hamiltonian approach for Morse potential. Two Hamiltonians are said to be strictly isospectral, if they have exactly the same eigenvalue spectrum and S-matrix. The wavefunctions and their dependent quantities are different but related. This has been used to different physical situations, which are of interest to various fields 5,6. Though the idea of generating isospectral Hamiltonians using the Gelfand-Levitan approach 7, Darboux procedures 8,9 were known for some time, the supersymmetric quantum mechanical techniques (which deals with first order operators) make the procedure look simpler -. When one deletes a bound state of a given potential V(x) and re-introduce the state, it involves solving a first order differential equation, which admits a free parameter. Thus, a set of onedimensional family of potentials V ˆ( x, λ ) can be constructed which have exactly the same energy spectrum as that of V(x). In general, for any one dimensional potential (full line or half-line) with n bound states, one can construct an n-parameter family of strictly isospectral potentials, i.e. potentials with eigenvalues, reflection and transmission coefficients identical to those for original potential. Using this formalism, we make a one-parameter deformation of the one-dimensional Morse potential. The deformed wavefunctions are then used to calculate the FC factors. The FC factors thus obtained can be made to match experimental data by a suitable choice of the deformation parameter (λ).

KUMAR & KUMAR: CALCULATION OF FRANCK-CONDON FACTORS 739 Isospectral Hamiltonian Approach The connection between the bound state wavefunctions and the potential is one of the key ingredients in solving exactly for the spectrum of onedimensional potential problems. Once we know the ground state wavefunction (ψ ) and choose its energy to be zero, we can factorize the Hamiltonian 3 as H =A A,, (in units ħ=m=), where A=(d/)+W(x) and A =( d/)+w(x) are the supersymmetric operators and W(x)=( d/)[lnψ (x)] is called the superpotential. We have: H ψ = A Aψ =ε ψ () n n n n Multiplying both sides with A, we get, AA Aψ n =εn Aψ n ( ) ( ) H ( Aψ ) =ε ( Aψ ) () n n n Here, H is the supersymmetric partner Hamiltonian of H, with eigenfunctions χ n =Aψ n. It is obvious that H has the same eigenvalue spectrum as that of H, but for the case Aψ =, which is the case of supersymmetry broken. Explicitly, the relation between Hamiltonians reads, E = E ; E = () () () n n+ ψ = [ E ] Aψ () () / () n n+ n+ ψ = [ E ] A ψ () () / () n+ n n The superpotential relates the supersymmetric partner potentials V (x) and V (x) as: dw V, = W m (3) It is well known that for the potential V (x), the original potential V (x) is not unique,. The argument is as follows. Suppose H has another factorization BB, where B = (d/d x) + Wˆ, then, H = AA = BB but H = B B is not AA rather it defines a certain new Hamiltonian. For superpotential W ˆ ( x ), the partner potential V (x) is V x = Wˆ x + Wˆ x (4) ( ) ( ) ( ) Consider the most general solution as W ˆ = W +φ, which demands that, φ + W φ +φ =. (5) The solution of Eq. (5) is (d/d x)ln [ I ] φ = +λ, x where I = ψ ( x ) and λ is a constant. Therefore, we obtain, d Wˆ ( x ) = W ( x ) + ln [ I ( x ) +λ ] (6) The corresponding one-parameter family of potentials V ˆ ( x, λ ) is given as: d Vˆ ( x, λ ) = V ( x ) [ln( I ( x ) +λ )]. (7) The normalized ground state wavefunction corresponding to the potential V ˆ ( x, λ ) reads, λ ( +λ) ψ ˆ ( x, ), ψ λ = I +λ (8) where λ / (, ). The excited state eigenfunctions for the potential V ˆ ( x, λ ) are given by, ˆ (, ) () I d + Wx () ψn + (). x ψn+ xλ =ψ n+ x + En + I() x +λ (9) The Eqs (7-9) represent the one-parameter family of isospectral potentials and wavefunctions, which shall be used to calculate the FC factors and r- centroids. 3 FC Factors and r-centroids for Morse Potential Morse potential is characterized by two parameters, depth of the potential minimum D and inverse of its range >, [=(k/d) /, k being the bond force constant]. The one-dimensional Morse potential is V = D[{ exp( x)} ] ()

74 INDIAN J PURE & APPL PHYS, VOL 43, OCTOBER 5 where x is the position with respect to equilibrium point. The discrete spectrum of the potential is given as E h = ( j ) μ... () / where j = [( μd) / h ] /, μ is the reduced mass of the molecule and =,,,... j. The eigenfunctions corresponding to the eigenvalue () are obtained as 3 ψ ( ξ ) = N exp( ξ/) ξ L ( ξ ) () j- (j-) j, j, where ξ= ( j+ ) exp( x) and L α Laguerre polynomial given by, L α k k = ( ) ξ k= is the associated Γ+α+ ( ) (3) k!( k)! Γ ( k +α+ ) Normalization factor is given as N j,!( j ) = Γ( j + ) / (4) Molecular FC factors describe the dependence on the vibrational wavefunctions of the transition intensities between vibrational states in different electronic configurations. Assuming that the electronic wavefunctions are independent of the vibrational states, the FC factors are given by the square of the overlap integral between initial and final wavefunctions in the transition. = =.9Å, R =.67Å and R =3.6Å, which are given in Table. 3. FC factors and r-centroids for isospectral Morse potential Using isospectral Hamiltonian approach, the oneparameter family of isospectral Morse potential is obtained as, I I Vˆ( x, λ ) = V ( x ) I +λ I +λ where j ( j + ) I = exp[ jx ( j + )exp( x)]. ( j )! (7) The isospectral potential is plotted for different values of deformation parameter λ in Fig.. The potential for λ is just the initial potential V(x), whereas for smaller values of λ, the well becomes deep and a local maxima develops in the potential. Similar analysis holds for λ<. After some straightforward calculations, we obtain the normalized ground state wavefunction for the isospectral Morse potential as, ( 9! ) / λ ( +λ) t exp[ 5 ( x R)] ψ ˆ 5, = (8) λ+ exp[exp{ ( x R)} 9 x] t + t where ( ) 3 q x R x R, = ψ [ j, ( ) ψj, ( ) ] (5) where R and R are equilibrium distances of the nuclei in the initial and final electronic states. The r- centroid is the unique value of inter nuclear separation, which is given by ψ ( x R ) x ψ ( x R ) =. (6) ψ ψ j, j,, j, ( x R ) j, ( x R ) r We present the calculations for FC factors and r-centroids for Morse potential using j =j =5; Fig. One-parameter family of strictly isospectral Morse potential for λ=6. (dashed line), λ= (dotted line), λ=5 (dotdash line) and solid line represents the undeformed Morse potential

KUMAR & KUMAR: CALCULATION OF FRANCK-CONDON FACTORS 74 t x R 5 = () exp[ exp{ ( ) / }] t = 6497exp(9 R) + exp(9 x) + 46exp[3 ( x+ R)] + 536exp[ ( x+ 8 R)] + exp[3 ( x+ R)] + exp[ (8 x+ R)] and t3 = 3866exp[ (x+ 7 R)] + 34exp[ (4x+ 5 R)] + 6exp[ (5x+ 4 R)] + 6exp[ (7x+ R)]. Similarly, we obtain the higher excited state wavefunctions and calculate the FC factors and r-centroids using the relation: qˆ ( ) [ ˆ ( x R, ) ˆ ( x R, ) ], λ = ψj, λ ψj, λ...(9) matching with the experimental data. The values of r-centroids are plotted for both positive and negative values of deformation parameter in Fig. 4. It is clear from these plots that for large values of λ (as λ ± ), we get the undeformed values of FC factors and r-centroids. Therefore, one can choose a particular value of λ, for which the FC factors match with the experimental values. Further, notice that the variation of FC factors as a function of the deformation parameter is more prominent in Fig. 3. The relative transition intensities are related to FC factors as I, v 4 q,, where v is the difference between vibrational energies of the initial and final states in the transition. Thus, a suitable choice of value for deformation parameter will reduce the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental values of transition intensities. The FC factors and r-centroids are calculated for each transition, which include the deformation parameter. The four values of FC factors ( qˆ,, qˆ ˆ ˆ,, q,, q,) show the similar variation with deformation parameter λ> and are plotted in Fig.. The FC factors increase monotonically for small values of λ and reach their respective saturation values (the undeformed values), which are presented in Table. The values of ˆq, (and ˆq, ) plotted in Fig. 3 show a different feature of initially increase (decrease) and then decrease (increase) to their respective saturation value. Similarly, the FC values can also be varied with negative λ< which increases our freedom to choose the value of λ Table FC factors and the values of r-centroids for Morse potential parameters j =j =5; = =.9Å, R =.67Å and R =3.6Å. The first line corresponds to FC factors and second line corresponds to r-centroid values v /v.85.757.77499 3.3997 3.7994.97364.64854.639. 3.7399.8635.3776.7376.559484.6937 4.435 4.56.89537 3.645.993.636 3.537 4.98347 4.9354 4.788.58937.445.94856 4.76 6.466 Fig. Franck-Condon factors ˆq, (solid line), ˆq, (dot-dash line), ˆq, (dotted line) and ˆq, (dashed line) as a function of λ Fig. 3 Franck-Condon factors, ˆq (solid line) and, ˆq (broken line) as a function of λ

74 INDIAN J PURE & APPL PHYS, VOL 43, OCTOBER 5 values). By following the work of Keung et al. 5, one can also obtain a multi parameter family of isospectral Morse potential Vˆ( x, λ, λ,... λ n ), where we can deal with more deformation parameters, increasing the freedom to obtain the values closest to experimental data. The application of this approach to calculate the FC factors and r-centroids for specific diatomic molecules is under progress. Acknowledgement AK, CNK acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for assistance through SRF and research grant respectively. Fig. 4 Values of r-centroids, r as a function of λ for both positive and negative values 4 Conclusion In this paper, we have presented the calculations for FC factors and r-centroids using isospectral Hamiltonian approach, which deals with first order differential equations. FC factors represent one of the most useful and pervasive mathematical concepts employed for the study of molecules and their interactions. In case, the calculations for FC factors, r- centroids or transition intensities do not match with experimental data, this approach has benefit to reduce the discrepancy without destroying the energy eigenvalue agreement. We showed in Figs and 3 the dependence of various FC factors on the deformation parameter. Fig. 4 describes the behaviour of r-centroid values as a function of deformation parameter (λ taking both positive and negative References Fernandez F M & Ogilvie J F, Chem Phys Lett, 69 (99) 9. Carvajal M, Arias J M & Gomez-Camacho J, Phys Rev A, 59 (999) 346. 3 Lopez J C V, Rivera A L, Smirnov Yu F & Frank A, arxiv: physics/97. 4 Morse P M, Phys Rev, 34 (99) 57. 5 Kumar C N, J Phys A, (987) 5397. 6 Khare A & Kumar C N, Mod Phys Lett A, 8 (993) 53. 7 Chadan K & Sabatier P C, Inverse Problems in Quantum Scattering Theory (Springer, Berlin), 977. 8 Abraham P B & Moses H E, Phys Rev A, (98) 333. 9 Pursey D L, Phys Rev D, 33 (986) 48. Mielnik B, J Math Phys, 5 (984) 3387. Neito M M, Phys Lett B, 45 (984) 8. Cooper F, Khare A & Sukhatme U, Phys Rep 5 (995). 3 Sukumar C V, J Phys A: Math Gen, 8 (985) 97. 4 Khare A & Sukhatme U, J Phys A: Math Gen, (989) 847. 5 Keung W Y, Sukhatme U, Wang Q & Imbo T D, J Phys A, (989) L987.