Orbit closures of quiver representations

Similar documents
5 Quiver Representations

Examples of Semi-Invariants of Quivers

DESINGULARIZATION OF QUIVER GRASSMANNIANS FOR DYNKIN QUIVERS. Keywords: Quiver Grassmannians, desingularizations.

Representations of quivers and their applications. 3 lectures by. Jerzy Weyman. 1. The basics of quiver representations.

Peter Magyar Research Summary

The preprojective algebra revisited

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 17 Apr 2015

Research Statement. András Cristian Lőrincz

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 20 Dec 2018

Sheaf cohomology and non-normal varieties

Some remarks on Nakajima s quiver varieties of type A

ON THE GEOMETRY OF ORBIT CLOSURES FOR REPRESENTATION-INFINITE ALGEBRAS

LECTURE 16: REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS

ORBIT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE REPRESENTATIONS ASSOCIATED TO GRADED LIE ALGEBRAS. Jerzy Weyman. July 14-18, Content

On the Homology of the Ginzburg Algebra

Dimer models and cluster categories of Grassmannians

DEGENERACY SCHEMES, QUIVER SCHEMES AND SCHUBERT VARIETIES. v. lakshmibai and peter magyar 1

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Quiver Representations

GIT-Equivalence and Semi-Stable Subcategories of Quiver Representations

THE FUNDAMENTAL MODULE OF A NORMAL LOCAL DOMAIN OF DIMENSION 2

Bernstein-Sato Polynomials for Quivers

Representations of quivers

Quiver Representations and Gabriel s Theorem

Isotropic Schur roots

arxiv: v3 [math.rt] 14 Mar 2014

Combinatorial aspects of derived equivalence

Auslander-Reiten-quivers of functorially finite subcategories

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I - FINAL PROJECT

CLUSTER ALGEBRA STRUCTURES AND SEMICANONICAL BASES FOR UNIPOTENT GROUPS

LOCAL COHOMOLOGY IN COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA AND ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Conjugation on varieties of nilpotent matrices

Boundary of Cohen-Macaulay cone and asymptotic behavior of system of ideals

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

IRREDUCIBLE COMPONENTS OF VARIETIES OF MODULES

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 19 Jan 2006

SEMI-STABLE SUBCATEGORIES FOR EUCLIDEAN QUIVERS

A visual introduction to Tilting

Multiplicity One Theorems

AUSLANDER-REITEN THEORY FOR FINITE DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRAS. Piotr Malicki

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

Weyl orbits of π-systems in Kac-Moody algebras

MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties

Asymptotic Degeneration of Representations of Quivers V. Strassen University of Konstanz January 5, 999 Abstract We dene asymptotic degeneration of ni

Moduli spaces of sheaves and the boson-fermion correspondence

Counting matrices over finite fields

Representations of quivers

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

CLUSTER-TILTED ALGEBRAS OF FINITE REPRESENTATION TYPE

CALDERO-CHAPOTON ALGEBRAS

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

Rank functors and representation rings of quivers

ON BASE SIZES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Periodicity of selfinjective algebras of polynomial growth

Partial orders related to the Hom-order and degenerations.

STRONGNESS OF COMPANION BASES FOR CLUSTER-TILTED ALGEBRAS OF FINITE TYPE

The Geometry of Conjugacy Classes of Nilpotent Matrices

Combinatorial Restrictions on the AR Quiver of a Triangulated Category

Quivers and the Euclidean algebra (Extended abstract)

PULLBACK MODULI SPACES

Multi-parameter persistent homology: applications and algorithms

Applications of geometry to modular representation theory. Julia Pevtsova University of Washington, Seattle

2. Finite dimensional algebras In this chapter, A will always denote an algebra (usually finite dimensional) over an algebraically closed field k and

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Classification of Numerical Semigroups

Representation type, boxes, and Schur algebras

DEFORMATIONS OF BIMODULE PROBLEMS

Tensor Complexes. Christine Berkesch Duke University

LECTURES ON SINGULARITIES AND ADJOINT LINEAR SYSTEMS

4.1. Paths. For definitions see section 2.1 (In particular: path; head, tail, length of a path; concatenation;

LECTURE 4. Definition 1.1. A Schubert class σ λ is called rigid if the only proper subvarieties of G(k, n) representing σ λ are Schubert varieties.

On the additive categories of generalized standard almost cyclic coherent Auslander Reiten components

Moment map flows and the Hecke correspondence for quivers

ON THE INVARIANT THEORY FOR ACYCLIC GENTLE ALGEBRAS

THE GL(2, C) MCKAY CORRESPONDENCE

1 Overview. Research Statement Andrew T. Carroll 2011

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples.

Rank functors and representation rings of quivers

Derived Canonical Algebras as One-Point Extensions

ADE Dynkin diagrams in algebra, geometry and beyond based on work of Ellen Kirkman

Dimensions of Triangulated Categories, joint work with M. Ballard and L. Katzarkov

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

ON LOCALLY SEMI-SIMPLE REPRESENTATIONS OF QUIVERS

Noncommutative compact manifolds constructed from quivers

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

Finite representation type

Derived categories and rationality of conic bundles

Title: Free resolutions, degeneracy loci, and moduli spaces Speaker: Steven Sam (joint work with Laurent Gruson and Jerzy Weyman)

CATALAN NUMBERS AND EXCEPTIONAL SEQUENCES

Compatibly split subvarieties of Hilb n (A 2 k)

QUIVERS AND LATTICES.

LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL

GENERALIZED BRAUER TREE ORDERS

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

Hypertoric varieties and hyperplane arrangements

NILPOTENT ORBIT VARIETIES AND THE ATOMIC DECOMPOSITION OF THE q-kostka POLYNOMIALS

Some Classification of Prehomogeneous Vector Spaces Associated with Dynkin Quivers of Exceptional Type

arxiv: v3 [math.rt] 28 Jun 2012

Dimension of the mesh algebra of a finite Auslander-Reiten quiver. Ragnar-Olaf Buchweitz and Shiping Liu

Indecomposable Quiver Representations

Transcription:

Orbit closures of quiver representations Kavita Sutar Chennai Mathematical Institute September 5, 2012

Outline 1 Orbit closures 2 Geometric technique 3 Calculations 4 Results

Quiver Q = (Q 0, Q 1 ) is a directed graph with set of vertices Q 0 and set of arrows Q 1. (Notation: ta a ha) Dynkin quiver - underlying unoriented graph is a Dynkin diagram.

A n D n E 6 E 7 E 8

Quiver Q = (Q 0, Q 1 ) is a directed graph with set of vertices Q 0 and set of arrows Q 1. (Notation: ta a ha) Dynkin quiver - underlying unoriented graph is a Dynkin diagram. A representation of Q is a pair V = ((V i ) i Q0, (V(a)) a Q1 ), where V i are finite-dimensional vector spaces over algebraically closed field k V(a) and V ta V ha. Dimension vector d = (dimv i ) i Q0. The representation space of dimension type d = (d i ) i Q0 N Q0 Rep(Q, d) = {V = ((V i ) i Q0, (V(a)) a Q1 ) dim(v i ) = d i } = a Q 1 Hom(V ta, V ha ) = A N.

GL(d) = i Q 0 GL(d i ) GL(d) acts on Rep(Q, d) by simultaneous change of basis at each vertex ((g i ) i Q0, (V(a)) a Q1 ) = (g ha V(a) g 1 ta ) a Q1 {GL(d) orbits} {isomorphism classes of representations of Q} O V [V] Orbit closure O V is a subvariety of the affine space Rep(Q, d).

Example 1 a 2 b 3 Q = (Q 0, Q 1 ); Q 0 = {1, 2, 3}, Q 1 = {a, b} V 1 V a V 2 V b V 3 Rep(Q, d) = Hom(V 1, V 2) Hom(V 2, V 3) d = (dim V 1, dim V 2, dim V 3) k 3 k 4 k 3 V a V b Rep(Q, (3, 4, 3)) = Hom(k 3, k 4 ) Hom(k 4, k 3 ) = A 24 k 3 V k 4 k 3 a V b Gl(3, k) Gl(4, k) Gl(3, k) GL(d) = GL(3) GL(4) GL(3) (g 1, g 2, g 3) (V a, V b ) := (g 2 V a g 1 1, g 3 V b g 1 2 ) O V is an affine variety in A 24.

Example V x V(a) dimv x = d Rep(Q, d) = M d d (k) Group action: conjugation Orbits: conjugacy classes of matrices in M(d, k) Geometry: normal, Cohen-Macaulay varieties with rational singularities. For nilpotent V(a), if char k > 0 then O V(a) is a Frobenius split variety. if char k = 0 then O V(a) is Gorenstein; defining ideal generated by minors of various sizes.

Example V (a) V 1 V 2 d = (d 1, d 2 ) Rep(Q, d) = M d2 d 1 (k) Group action: (g 1, g 2 ) V(a) = g 1 V(a)g 1 2 Orbits: O r = matrices of rank r, 0 r m = min(d 1, d 2 ) O r = j r O j (determinantal varieties) = {W Rep(Q, d) rank W(a) r} Geometry: normal, Cohen-Macaulay varieties with rational singularities; Gorenstein if r = 0, r = m or d 1 = d 2 ; regular if r = 0 or r = m; Resolution of defining ideal (Lascoux); defining ideal generated by (r + 1) (r + 1) minors.

Why study orbit closures? types of singularities degenerations desingularization normality, C-M, unibranchness tangent spaces defining equations etc.

Some results (1981) Abeasis, Del Fra, Kraft Equi-oriented quiver of type A n : orbit closures are normal, Cohen-Macaulay with rational singularities. (1998) Laxmibai, Magyar Extended the above result to arbitrary characteristic. (2001,2002) Bobinski, Zwara Proved the above result for A n with arbitrary orientation and for D n. Defining ideals? What about quivers of type E?

Goal To study orbit closures by calculating resolutions Strategy Use geometric technique

p Z X V V q q Y X X: affine space Y: subvariety V: a projective variety

Z X V q q p Y X V (affine space) (projective variety) Let Z = tot(η) and X V = tot(e). Exact sequence of vector bundles over V: 0 η E τ 0 Define ξ = τ K(ξ) : 0 t ξ 2 (p ξ) p ξ O X V resolves O Z as O X V -module.

Z X V q q p Y X V (affine space) (projective variety) Let Z = tot(η) and X V = tot(e). Exact sequence of vector bundles over V: 0 η E τ 0 Define ξ = τ K(ξ) : 0 t ξ 2 (p ξ) p ξ O X V q F

Z X V q q p Y X V (affine space) (projective variety) Main theorem [Weyman] F i = i+j H j (V, ξ) K A( i j) where A = K[X]. j 0 F i = 0 for i < 0 F is a finite free resolution of the normalization of K[Y]. If F i = 0 for i < 0 and F 0 = A Y is normal, Cohen-Macaulay and has rational singularities.

(Reineke desingularization) Z Rep(Q, d) x Q 0 F lag(d s (x),..., K d(x) ) q q p O V Rep(Q, d) x Q 0 F lag(d s (x),..., K d(x) ) F i = j 0 Hj (V, i+j ξ) K A( i j) where A = K[Rep(Q, d)]. If F i = 0 for i < 0 F is a finite free resolution of the normalization of K[O V ]. If F i = 0 for i < 0 and F 0 = A O V is normal and has rational singularities.

Steps in the construction Construct the Auslander-Reiten quiver of Q. Find a directed partition of the AR quiver (with s parts). Define a subset of Z I,V of Rep(Q, d) x Q 0 Flag(β, V x ) Z I,V = {(V, (R s (x) R 2 (x) V x ) x Q0 ) a Q 1, t, V(a)(R t (ta)) R t (ha)} Z I,V q Rep(Q, d) Flag(β, V x ) x Q 0 O V Rep(Q, d) q Theorem [Reineke] q(z I,V) = O V. q is a proper birational isomorphism of Z I,V and O V.

Example - determinantal variety KK 1 2 0K K0 V = a(0k) b(kk) c(k0) Z : V 1 V 2 β i = dim R i R 1 R 2 2 Z Rep(Q, Hom(V 1 d), V 2 ) Gr(β Flag(β 2, V i, 2 V) i ) i=1

Example - determinantal variety V φ 1 V 2 dim V 1 = 2 dim V 2 = 3 r = rank φ = 2 X = Hom(V 1, V 2 ) = V1 V 2 Orbit closure O V = {φ : V 1 V 2 rk φ 2} V = Gr(2, V 2 ) Z = tot(v1 R) = {(φ, R) im(φ) R} A = K[X] = Sym(V 1 V2 ) Lascoux resolution 0 S 21 V 1 3 V2 A( 3) d2 2 V 1 2 V2 A( 2) d1 A 0 d 1 = (x 11 x 22 x 12 x 21, x 11 x 32 x 12 x 31, x 21 x 32 x 22 x 31 ) x 31 x 32 d 2 = x 21 x 22 x 11 x 12

Non-equioriented A 3 0KK K00 1 2 3 0K0 KKK KK0 00K V = m α X α Z : V1 V 2 V α R 3 + β i = dim R i R 1 R 2 R 3 3 Z Rep(Q, d) Flag(β Gr(β i, i V, i V) i ) i=1

Non-equioriented A 3 0KK K00 1 2 3 0K0 KKK KK0 00K V = α R + X α Z : V 1 V 2 V 3 d = (3, 4, 3) β = (2, 1, 2) R 1 R 2 R 3 ξ = R 1 Q 2 R 3 Q 2

A 4 (source-sink ) K000 0KK0 000K 1 2 3 4 KKK0 0KKK 00K0 KKKK 0K00 00KK KK00 V = m α X α Z : V1 V 2 V 3 V α R 4 + R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 Z Rep(Q, d) S 1 4 Flag(βi 2, βi 1, V i ) i=1 S 2 S 3 S 4

A 4 (source-sink ) K000 0KK0 000K 1 2 3 4 KKK0 0KKK 00K0 KKKK 0K00 00KK KK00 V = m α X α Z : V1 V 2 V 3 V α R 4 + R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 S 1 ξ = (R 1 2 Q 1 1 + R 2 2 Q 2 1 ) (R 1 2 Q 1 3 + R 2 2 Q 2 3 ) (R 1 4 Q 1 3 + R 2 4 Q 2 3 ) S 2 S 3 S 4

ξ = a Q 1 ( t ξ = s t=1 R ta t a Q 1 λ(a) =t Q ha ) ( t ξ = R ta t a Q 1 S λ(a) R ta t Assign weights to each summand. S λ(a) Q ha t Q ha ) t Apply Bott s theorem to these weights to calculate F i = i+j H j (V, ξ) K A( i j), j 0 j = #exchanges D(λ) := a Q 1 λ(a) j = (i + j) j = i. Rewrite F D(λ) = i+j H j (V, ξ) K A( i j) j 0

Non-equioriented A 3 V 1 V 3 V 2 F D(λ) = c ν λ,µ(s λ V 1 S µ V 2 S ν V3 ) λ + µ =t Theorem (-) D(λ) E Q F 0 = A and F i = 0 for i < 0. Thus O V is normal and has rational singularities.

V 1 φ V 3 ψ V2 Theorem(-) Minimal generators of the defining ideal: Let p =rank(φ), q =rank(ψ), r =rank(φ + ψ), the minimal generators of O V are (p + 1) (p + 1) minors of φ, (q + 1) (q + 1) minors of ψ, (r + 1) (r + 1) minors of φ + ψ, taken by choosing b + k + 1 columns of φ and c + l + 1 columns of ψ such that k + l = d 1. (b, c, d are multiplicities of some indecomposable representations) Characterization of Gorenstein orbits.

0KK K00 1 2 3 0K0 KKK KK0 00K V = α R + X α Z : V 1 V 2 V 3 d = (3, 4, 3) R 1 R 2 R 3 ξ = R 1 Q 2 R 3 Q 2 A = Sym(V 1 V 3 ) Sym(V 2 V 3 )

A ( 3 V 1 3 V 3 A( 3)) ( 3 V 2 3 V 3 A( 3)) ( 2 V 1 2 V 2 4 V 3 A( 4)) (S 211 V 1 4 V 3 A( 4)) (S 211 V 2 4 V 3 A( 4)) ( 3 V 1 2 V 2 S 2111 V 3 A( 5)) ( 2 V 1 3 V 2 S 2111 V 3 A( 5)) 3 V 1 3 V 2 S 222 V 3 A( 6) (S 211 V 1 3 V 2 S 2221 V 3 A( 7)) ( 3 V 1 S 211 V 2 S 2221 V 3 A( 7)) ( 2 V 1 S 222 V 2 S 2222 V 3 A( 8)) (S 222 V 1 2 V 2 S 2222 V 3 A( 8)) 3 V 1 3 V 2 S 3111 V 3 A( 6) (S 211 V 1 S 211 V 2 S 2222 V 3 A( 8)) (S 222 V 1 3 V 2 S 3222 V 3 A( 9)) ( 3 V 1 S 222 V 2 S 3222 V 3 A( 9)) (S 222 V 1 S 222 V 2 S 3333 V 3 A( 12))

Source-sink quivers Theorem(-) Q be a source-sink quiver and V be a representation of Q such that the orbit closure O V admits a 1-step desingularization Z. Then D(λ) E Q Corollary If Q is Dynkin then O V is normal and has rational singularities. Orbit closures of type E 6, E 7 and E 8 admitting a 1-step desingularization are normal! Corollary If Q is extended Dynkin then F is a minimal free resolution of the normalization of O V.

Equioriented A n Theorem(-) Let Q be an equioriented quiver of type A n and β, γ be two dimension vectors. Let α = β + γ and V Rep(Q, α). Then D(λ) E Q F(β, γ) i = 0 for i < 0. F(β, γ) 0 = A. The summands of F(β, γ) 1 are of the form γ i+β j+1 V i γ i+β j+1 V j where 1 i < j n.

Thank you!