GENERALIZED TWISTED FIELDS

Similar documents
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille

Ring Theory Problem Set 2 Solutions

RINGS WITH UNIQUE ADDITION

ON DIVISION ALGEBRAS*

On R-Strong Jordan Ideals

THREE-FOLD IRREGULAR BRANCHED COVERINGS OF SOME SPATIAL GRAPHS

A THEOREM ON THE DERIVATIONS OF JORDAN ALGEBRAS

Some isotopy-isomorphy conditions for m-inverse quasigroups and loops

On Middle Universal Weak and Cross Inverse Property Loops With Equal Length Of Inverse Cycles

3. The Carlitz Module

A Generalization of Boolean Rings

When is the Ring of 2x2 Matrices over a Ring Galois?

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Eighth Homework Solutions

McCoy Rings Relative to a Monoid

ZERO SQUARE RINGS RICHARD P. STANLEY

APPROXIMATE UNITS AND MAXIMAL ABELIAN C*-SUBALGEBRAS

Graduate Preliminary Examination

Krull Dimension and Going-Down in Fixed Rings

OTTO H. KEGEL. A remark on maximal subrings. Sonderdrucke aus der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

THE RADICAL OF A NON-ASSOCIATIVE ALGEBRA

Algebra Exam Topics. Updated August 2017

On Middle Universal m-inverse Quasigroups And Their Applications To Cryptography

Definitions, Theorems and Exercises. Abstract Algebra Math 332. Ethan D. Bloch

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Generalized Cayley Digraphs

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Left-invariant Lorentz metrics on Lie groups. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 16(1) P.143-P.150

Rings With Topologies Induced by Spaces of Functions

MATH 403 MIDTERM ANSWERS WINTER 2007

Possible orders of nonassociative Moufang loops by

WEDDERBURN S LITTLE THEOREM

AN IDENTITY IN JORDAN RINGS

AUTOMORPHISMS OF ORDER TWO*

Chapter XI Novanion rings

Free group algebras generated by symmetric elements inside division rings with involution

Generalized Boolean and Boolean-Like Rings

COMMUTATIVE SEMIFIELDS OF ORDER 243 AND 3125

Strongly Nil -Clean Rings

ON SYMMETRIC SETS OF UNIMODULAR SYMMETRIC MATRICES

Ultraproducts of Finite Groups

Math 210B:Algebra, Homework 2

THE STRUCTURE OF AUTOMORPHIC LOOPS

Hong Kee Kim, Nam Kyun Kim, and Yang Lee

ON STRONGLY PRIME IDEALS AND STRONGLY ZERO-DIMENSIONAL RINGS. Christian Gottlieb

Math 210B: Algebra, Homework 4

Communications in Algebra 13(1), (1985) 1

ON REGULARITY OF FINITE REFLECTION GROUPS. School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

The Radicans. James B. Wilson. April 13, 2002

TORSION CLASSES AND PURE SUBGROUPS

ON THE SUBGROUPS OF TORSION-FREE GROUPS WHICH ARE SUBRINGS IN EVERY RING

II. Products of Groups

THE SOLUTION OF 3y2 ± 2" = x3

RINGS HAVING ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OF SMALL DIAMETER OR LARGE GIRTH. S.B. Mulay

Generators of certain inner mapping groups

φ(a + b) = φ(a) + φ(b) φ(a b) = φ(a) φ(b),

EP elements and Strongly Regular Rings

The 3-local cohomology of the Mathieu group M 24

Chan Huh, Sung Hee Jang, Chol On Kim, and Yang Lee

THE TRACE MAP AND SEPARABLE ALGEBRAS

K. Johnson Department of Mathematics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada D. Patterson

Tutte Polynomials of Bracelets. Norman Biggs

TRIVIAL EXTENSION OF A RING WITH BALANCED CONDITION

FIXED-POINT FREE ENDOMORPHISMS OF GROUPS RELATED TO FINITE FIELDS

Chain Rule. MATH 311, Calculus III. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

SEMI-INVARIANTS AND WEIGHTS OF GROUP ALGEBRAS OF FINITE GROUPS. D. S. Passman P. Wauters University of Wisconsin-Madison Limburgs Universitair Centrum

Spectra of Semidirect Products of Cyclic Groups

Part 1. For any A-module, let M[x] denote the set of all polynomials in x with coefficients in M, that is to say expressions of the form

Subrings and Ideals 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 SUBRING

REMARKS 7.6: Let G be a finite group of order n. Then Lagrange's theorem shows that the order of every subgroup of G divides n; equivalently, if k is

φ(xy) = (xy) n = x n y n = φ(x)φ(y)

TRANSITIVE AND FULLY TRANSITIVE PRIMARY ABELIAN GROUPS

Math 547, Exam 1 Information.

ON THE RANGE OF A DERIVATION

NOTES ON MODULES AND ALGEBRAS

SEMIFIELDS ARISING FROM IRREDUCIBLE SEMILINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

A CLASS OF LOOPS CATEGORICALLY ISOMORPHIC TO UNIQUELY 2-DIVISIBLE BRUCK LOOPS

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 21 Jul 2009

Available online at J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2 (2012), No. 6, ISSN: COSET CAYLEY DIGRAPH STRUCTURES

PRIMITIVE SPACES OF MATRICES OF BOUNDED RANK.II

CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCAL RINGS

COMMUTATIVE PRESEMIFIELDS AND SEMIFIELDS

Algebraic structures I

1. Group Theory Permutations.

CHAPTER I. Rings. Definition A ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition + and

TWISTED SEMIGROUP CROSSED PRODUCTS AND THE TWISTED TOEPLITZ ALGEBRAS OF ORDERED GROUPS

Galois fields/1. (M3) There is an element 1 (not equal to 0) such that a 1 = a for all a.

Chapter 3. Differentiable Mappings. 1. Differentiable Mappings

SPINNING AND BRANCHED CYCLIC COVERS OF KNOTS. 1. Introduction

A NOTE ON FINITE UNIONS OF IDEALS AND SUBGROUPS

On generalized -derivations in -rings

Strongly nil -clean rings

HASSE ARF PROPERTY AND ABELIAN EXTENSIONS. Ivan B. Fesenko

JORDAN HOMOMORPHISMS AND DERIVATIONS ON SEMISIMPLE BANACH ALGEBRAS

AUTOMORPHISMS OF A FINITE ABELIAN GROUP WHICH REDUCE TO THE IDENTITY ON A SUBGROUP OR FACTOR GROUP J. C HOWARTH

Primitive Ideals of Semigroup Graded Rings

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

SIMPLE ROOT SYSTEMS AND PRESENTATIONS FOR CERTAIN COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS. Jian-yi Shi

Arithmetic Funtions Over Rings with Zero Divisors

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 133 Part 2. I. Topics from linear algebra

Transcription:

GENERALIZED TWISTED FIELDS A A ALBERT 1 Introduction Consider a finite field $ If V is any automorphism of & we define v to be the fixed field of K under V Let S and T be any automorphism of $ and define F to be the fixed field ( 1 ) S Sα ( s)r ( τ)s > under both S and Γ Then % is the field of q = j>* elements where p is the characteristic of $ and fi is a field of degree n over g We shall assume that (2) n>2 q > 2 Then the period of a primitive element of β is q n 1 and there always exist elements c in & such that c = k*- 1 for any element & of fi Indeed we could always select c to be a primitive element of β Define a product (a? #) on the additive abelian group β in terms of the product αj/ of the field S by (3 ) (»») = «Λ = i/b a - xy - c(xt)(ys) for c in β Then ( 4 ) A y = R y TR c{ys) B x = R x SR G{xT) where the transformation R y = J?[T/] is defined for all y in & by the product xy = a?i? y of β Then the condition that (a? #) = 0 for all xy Φ 0 is equivalent to the property that ' xt ys ' for any nonzero x and y of β But the definition of a generating automorphism U of $ over by xu x q implies that (6) S=U* T=W We shall assume that S = I Γ = I so that (7) 0</3<w 0<γ<^ Then ^^[(α S)^! 7 )]" 1 = a; 3 " 1 where (o) ± y K (Q i j i q' yq ±) z JU y Received April 25 1960 This paper was supported in part by an Esso Educational Foundation Grant and by NSF Grant G-9504

2 A A ALBERT Thus the condition that c Φ k q ~ λ is sufficient to insure the property that (% y) Φ 0 whenever xy Φ 0 For every c satisfying (5) we can define a division ring = ($ S T c) with unity quantity /' = e c where e is the unity quantity of S It is the same additive group as K and we define the product x / of ΰ by (9) xa e -yb e = (xy) These rings may be seen to generalize the twisted fields defined in an earlier paper 1 We shall show that 3) is isomorphic to $ if and only if S = T Indeed we shall derive the following result THEOREM 1 Let S Φ I T Φ I S Φ T Then the right nucleus of 35(SΪ S Γ c) is f s and the left nucleus of (jϊ S Γ c) is /ffi Γ // S is Zfee set of all elements g of $t such that gs gt then ga e = gb e and $>A e = 2B e is the middle nucleus of The result above implies that /g is the center of ( S T c) Since it is known 2 that isotopic rings have isomorphic right (left and middle) nuclei our results imply that the (generalized) twisted fields S)($ S T c) are new whenever the group generated by either S or T is not the group generated by S and T In this case our new twisted fields define new finite non-desarguesian projective planes 3 2 The fundamental equation* Consider the equation for x y and z in $ Assume that the degree of $ over τ is m where we shall now assume that (10) m > 2 1 For earlier definitions of twisted fields see the case c = 1 in On nonassociative division algebras Trans Amer Math Soc 72 (1952) 296-309 and the general case in Finite noncommutative division algebras Proc Amer Math Soc 9 (1958) 928-932 In those papers we defined a product [x y] = x(yt) cy(xt) so that (x y) = [x yt' 1 ] = xy - c(ys)(xt) is the product (3) with S = T' 1 2 This result was originally given for loops by R H Bruck It is easy to show that if φ and Φo are isotopic rings with isotopy defined by the relation QRxp=R i χ ) QR z then the mapping x -» (zx)p~ 1 induces an isomorphism of the right nucleus onto that of φ 0 and the mapping x -> {xz)p~ x induces an isomorphism of the middle nucleus of onto that of o 3 Two finite projective planes 9K(φ) and 9K(Φo) coordinatized by division rings % and Φo respectively are known to be isomorphic if and only if Φ and Φo are isotopic See the author's Finite division algebras and finite planes Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics; vol 10 pp 53-70

GENERALIZED TWISTED FIELDS Then the norm in & over τ of any element k of Sϊ is (11) v(fc) and v(k) is in ί Γ that is (12) Kfc) = for every k of 5ΐ Thus (13) I - (TR c ) m = where (14) d = e- Now (15) A e = l-tr C1 B e = I-SR c and we obtain (16) A e [I + TR C + {TR c f + + so that (17) i+ TR C + (TR c y + + Our definition (4) implies that (18) R a A y = A y R a R for every x and y of iγ providing that (19) a = at b = bs In particular i? d A y = A y R a and so (9) is equivalent to (20) AJJ + (ΓΛ β ) + (TR C Y + + (ΓΛ^- 1 ]^ = A s i2 d It is well known that distinct automorphisms of any field $ are linearly independent in the field of right multiplications of Thus we can equate the coefficients of the distinct powers of T in the equation (20) The right member of (20) is R zλ TR cd{zs) and so does not contain the term in T m ~ 1 when m > 2 It follows that (21) R x [( TR^-'Ry ~ (TR c r~\ TR c )R ys ] This equation is equivalent to (22) xt m ~\y - ys) = xst m ~\y - ys) 2 Ry - (TR c r~xtr c )R ys ] = 0

4 A A ALBERT and so to the relation (23) [(x - xst-^t - 1 ]^ - ys) = 0 By symmetry we have the following result LEMMA 1 Let T have period m > 2 Then the equation A z A~ ι A y =A z holds for some x yz in $ΐ only if y = ys or x = xst~\ If S has period m 0 > 2 the equation B y B~ 1 B x = J5 feoicίs /or some a y z in S if x = xt or y = yst' 1 3 The nuclei The ring 2) = (SΪ S Γ c) has its product defined bjr (24) x-y = xr y 0) =yl y c) where (25) R y χ = Aβ^A Li c i e - B?B % When S= Γ our formula (3) becomes (xy) = xy c[(xy)s] = xy(i But then the ring 0 defined by the product (xy) 9 is isotopic to the field St Since = (ffi S S c) is isotopic to 0 it is isotopic to SB and it is well known that is then also isomorphic to $ Assume henceforth that (26) S Φ T The right nucleus of S) is the set 5i p of all elements z p in ffi such that (27) (x-y)-z P = aj d/ «p) for every α? and?/ of ffi Suppose that 6 = bs so that (28) A b = R b - TR c{bs) = (/ - 2Ή c )i? & ^e-^& = i? δ By (18) we know that R b B x = J? a Λ 6 and so R b {B~ ι B x ) - (B^BJR for every a? of Λ By (25) this implies that the transformation (29) R b = A^A b = Riχ commutes with every L ( f However (27) is equivalent to (30) U c) Rζ = R { ξu x c) Thus bb e = 6(1- Si2 c ) = 6(e - c) = bf is in 5R P We have proved that the right nucleus of 2) = 3)(5t S Γ c) contains the field / ^ a subring of 3) isomorphic to $# ΓΛβ left nucleus 3l λ of S) consists of all ^λ such that (31) (zχ v) x = Zλ-(yx)

GENERALIZED TWISTED FIELDS 5 for all x and y of St This equation is equivalent to (32) L%R { C) X = R^Lΐl for every x of $ If a = at then B a = (I- SR c )R a B- χ B a = R a = L^] commutes with every A and every R c) and we see that the left Ae y x nucleus of S)(β S T c) contains the field fsi τ isomorphic to β Γ The middle nucleus of i = ( S T c) is the set 3l μ of all z μ of $ such that (33) (x-zj-y = a Ovi/) for every a? and y of β This equation is equivalent to (34) R { c) c) z R y = R { z% where z z μ However we can observe that the assumption that (35) Ri c) R = Rί c) for some v in ^ implies that (f z) y=f for every y in $t if and only if v = v = z y Hence (34) holds (36) A g A- χ A v = A υ for every y of β where v is in S and (37) gb e = z = z If ^S = gt then A = R g - TR c{gs) = R g - TR c{gτ) = R g - R g TR c = R g A e Then (36) becomes (38) RgA y = R g (R g TR c{ys) ) = R gy TR c{ysgt) = A gy Hence gb e = g(i SR C ) g (gs)c = g (gt)c = ga e and $ft μ contains the field of all elements gb e for gs = gt We are now able to derive the converse of these results We first observe that (27) is equivalent to (39) R\fRί c) = R [ l\ for every y of $t where z z p This equation is equivalent to (40) A y Ae'A u - A v where z = ub e If the period of T is m > 2 we use Lemma 1 to see that if we take y Φ yst~ x then u = us z ub e = fu The stated choice of y is always possible since we assuming that S Φ T and so some element of β is not left fixed by ST~\ Thus Stt = /^ Similarly is the period of S is not two then 5Jϊ λ = f$t τ Assume that one of S and T has period two

6 A A ALBERT The automorphisms S and T cannot both have period two For the group G of automorphisms of ^ is a cyclic group and has a unique subgroup ξ> of order two This group contains I and only one other automorphism If S and T both had period two we would have S T and so m = n = 2 contrary to hypothesis Thus we may assume that one of S and T has period two There is clearly no loss of generality if we assume that T has period two so that the period of S is at least three By the argument already given we have 5ft λ = f$ΐ τ We are then led to study (40) as holding for all elements y of where z p = ub e Now (41) A = I- TR ΰ A e (I + TR C ) = R d d = e - c(ct) = dt But then (40) becomes (42) [Ry TR c{ys )](I + TR C )[R U TR c{us) ] R υd TR cd{υs) This yields the equations (43) y[u - c(ct)(us)] - (yst)[c(ct)](u - us) = vd (44) yt(u - us) - ys[u - (us)c(ct)] = - d(vs) Hence d(ys)[us - (cs)(cst)(us 2 )] - ys 2 T(cS)(cST)(uS - us*)d = vs(ds)d = (ds)ys[u - (us)c(ct)] - yt(u - us)(ds) Since this holds for all y we have the transformation equation (45) SR[d(uS) - d(cs)(cst)us 2 ] - S 2 TR[d(cS)(cST)(uS - us 2 )] = SR[dSu - (ds)(us)c(ct)] - TR[(u - us)ds] Since S 2 Φ I and T Φ S S 2 T we know that the coefficient of S 2 T is zero Thus (u us)ds 0 and u us as desired This shows that The middle nucleus condition (36) implies that gs = gt if T does not have period two When T does have period two but S does not have period two the analogous property (46) U% = U C) U X C) is equivalent to (47) B g B?B x = B Ό and we see again that gs = gt stated in the introduction This completes our proof of the theorem

GENERALIZED TWISTED FIELDS 7 4 Commutativity It is known 4 that = (fi S S~~\ c) is commutative if and only if c = 1 There remains the case where (48) Sφl TΦl STΦl SΦT Any SB( S» Γ c) is commutative if and only if R { f = Li c) for every as of S Assume first that 8 ΦSt τ There is clearly no loss of generality if we assume that there is an element δ in $t 8 and not in $ Γ since the roles of S and T can be interchanged when ($ S T c) is commutative Thus we have b = bs φ bt By (28) we know that A h = A e R b and so we have iί# = i? δ Then L$ = B^-By = R b where y = (&/)Ar x It follows that (49) B g = R y SR c{yt) = -B e B 5 = (J SR c )R b Then lί y = R b y = 6 c(2/γ) = c(6γ) = cδ and δ = bt contrary to hypothesis We have shown that if 35( S Γ c) is commutative the automorphisms S and T have the same fixed fields that is δ = bs if and only Thΐls if δ = δγ δ is in g S a n d ϊ 7 both generate the cyclic automorphism group of order n of over g and S is a power of ϊ 7 Since rp-i _ yn-i _ gf there exists an integer r such that (50) 0 <r <n-l S = T r We now use the fact that R { c) x = Li c) for every x of iί to see that A~ λ A x - Br 1^ for every x of Λ where y = xb e A~\ Also (TR c ) n = (SR c ) n = i? v(c) and our condition becomes (51) [J = [I + SΉ C + (SR C ) 2 + + (SR)"- 1 ] [R y - SR c{yτ) ] where we have used the fact that d = e v(c) = dt = ώs the constant term to obtain the equation Compute (52) R x - (TR c ) n R xs = R y - (SR c ) u R yτ This is equivalent to the relation x [v(c)]{xs) = y [v(c)]yt for every x of K f where y = ίcbga^1 Thus (52) is equivalent to (53) /- SR V{C) =B e AeV- ΓBv(β)] We also compute the term in T r in (51) Since r < n 1 the left member of this term is (TR c ) r R x (TR c ) r R xs which is equal to R r R gc (R x - R xs ) where g = (cγ)(cγ) 2 -(cγ) 7 *- 1 The right member is the term in S and this is SR c (R y R yτ ) Hence (a? xs)g = y yt a result equivalent to 4 See footnote 1

8 A A ALBERT (54) (/ - S)B 0 = B e AΛI - T) Since the transformations I T and I 272 V(C) commute we may use (53) to obtain (55) (I - S)R g [I - TR Uΰ) ] = [I - SJ? v(β) ] (I - T) By (48) we may equate coefficients of I S T and ST respectively The constant term yields g = e The term in S then yields v(c) = e which is impossible when S and T generate the same group and 2) = (S S Γ c) is a division algebra We have proved the following result THEOREM 2 Let = 2)(ί8 S Γ c) be a division algebra defined for S Φ I T Φ I S Φ T Then S) is commutative if and only if ST = I and c = - 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO