U.S. Geological Survey National Geologic Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Department of the Interior

Similar documents
Energy From the Earth Geologic Carbon Storage: Feasibility, Technology, and Challenges

Geologic CO 2 Storage Options for California

(Brown & Loucks, 2009)

Geological CO 2 Storage Feasibility Study: Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil Fields, Ordos Basin, Shaanxi Province

Overview of USGS Carbon Sequestration Geologic Research and Assessments Project

West Coast Research. WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission

Offshore Geosequestration Potential in the Gulf of Mexico. Carbon Sequestration Opportunities in the North Sea Conference March, 2010

Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR UNDISCOVERED CONVENTIONAL OIL, GAS, AND NGL RESOURCES THE SEVENTH APPROXIMATION

What is the scope for carbon capture and storage in Northern Ireland. Michelle Bentham

5 IEAGHG CCS Summer School. Geological storage of carbon dioxide (a simple solution)

Field Scale Modeling of Local Capillary Trapping during CO 2 Injection into the Saline Aquifer. Bo Ren, Larry Lake, Steven Bryant

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

The Role of the Geoscientist in the U.S. Federal Government*

MAPPING GEOLOGICAL STORAGE PROSPECTIVITY OF CO 2 FOR THE WORLD S SEDIMENTARY BASINS AND REGIONAL SOURCE TO SINK MATCHING

Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (MRCSP) Press Briefing. February 21, 2008

Developments in Storage and Monitoring for CCUS

CO 2 storage capacity and injectivity analysis through the integrated reservoir modelling

Content. Conventional and Continuous Resources Concepts and Examples. Threshold geological parameters for source-rock resource potential

Geologic Storage (Almacenamiento Geológico) Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )

Course title: Exploration Economics, Risk Analysis and Prospect Evaluation

Source Sink Pipeline

Research in Induced Seismicity

MIDWEST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP PHASE II STORAGE CAPACITY POTENTIAL OVERVIEW

ADM CCS Projects Experience and Lessons Learned

Seismic mapping of the Utsira Formation. Petrophysical interpretations and fracture gradient estimates.

Presentation on CCS Opportunities in Cambodia

SACCCS Test Injection Workshop

SUCCESS. Critical Elements and Superior Strategy

MESOZOIC BASINS. North Carolina Geological Survey

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in Central Huron,

Gulf of México Mapping NATCARB Atlas

CO2 storage modelling and capacity estimates for the Trøndelag Platform a basin modelling approach

The Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Storage in the Saline Arbuckle Aquifer on Water Quality in Freshwater Aquifers in Kansas

Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies

Basin-Scale Hydrological Impact of Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: A Full-Scale Deployment Scenario

Storage 6 - Modeling for CO 2 Storage. Professor John Kaldi Chief Scientist, CO2CRC Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide, Australia

Briefing on DEQ s Proposed Geologic Sequestration (GS)

Exploration _Advanced geophysical methods. Research Challenges. Séverine Pannetier-Lescoffit and Ute Mann. SINTEF Petroleum Research

Project Number (DE-FE ) Jason Rush (W. Lynn Watney, Joint PI) Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas

June nd International Workshop on Offshore Geologic CO2 Storage

Basin-scale Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration in the Illinois Basin Status Report

QUEST Carbon Capture and Storage The Dynamic Aspects Of Formation Storage Use for CO2 Sequestration

Education Days Moscow Opening Session

Executive Summary Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Eastern Great Basin Province, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, and Arizona

An Assessment of Geological Carbon Sequestration in the Illinois Basin: The Illinois Basin-Decatur Site

STORAGE, HANDLING & SAFE USE OF CHEMICALS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

CO2 storage potential of basaltic rocks in Iceland and the oceanic ridges

Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies

An Integrated Characterization, Modeling, Risk Assessment, and Monitoring Plan for the Fort Nelson CCS Project

Update on the BASTOR Project Richard Vernon

Storage, Handling & Safe Use of Chemicals and Hazardous Materials

STORAGE, HANDLING & SAFE USE OF CHEMICALS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

REGIONAL STORAGE CAPACITY ESTIMATES: PROSPECTIVITY NOT STATISTICS

Chapter GL GLOSSARY. in U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series 60. By T. R. Klett, James W. Schmoker, Ronald R. Charpentier, Thomas S.

The experimental study on displacement pressure in fractured reservoir of Mudstone

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV)

Challenges of CCS in developing economics

3D Time-lapse Seismic Modeling for CO2 Sequestration

Initial Borehole Drilling in the Hornepayne and Manitouwadge Area

IN POLAND. Adam WÓJCICKI. National Research Institute

Storage 4 - Modeling for CO 2 Storage. Professor John Kaldi Chief Scientist, CO2CRC Australian School of Petroleum, University of Adelaide, Australia

Sleipner Benchmark Dataset and Model Comparison

Evaluation of the SPUNG Equation of State for use in Carbon Capture and Storage Modelling

Methodology: Ranking, Site Assessments & Volumetrics

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

Opportunities in Oil and Gas Fields Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

ENTERGY WHITE BLUFF PLANT RECYCLE POND A AND RECYCLE POND B DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA 257.

Natural Gas Assessment of the Arkoma Basin, Ouachita Thrust Belt, and Reelfoot Rift Introduction & Methodology Overview

AAPG European Region Annual Conference Paris-Malmaison, France November RESOURCES PERSPECTIVES of the SOUTHERN PERMIAN BASIN AREA

The Illinois Basin Decatur Project Decatur, Illinois USA: Overview and Impacts. Sallie E. Greenberg

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

BERG-HUGHES CENTER FOR PETROLEUM AND SEDIMENTARY SYSTEMS. Department of Geology and Geophysics College of Geosciences

Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Introduction to Formation Evaluation Abiodun Matthew Amao

Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions

Quantitative Risk Assessment Approaches for Induced Seismicity. NRC Committee on Earth Resources Induced Seismicity and Energy Tech Washington, DC

Appendix A: Geologic Data Sources Stephen F. Greb, James A. Drahovzal, and Thomas N. Sparks

Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture & Storage Project

CO 2 Geological Storage in the Province of Québec, Canada Capacity Evaluation of the St. Lawrence Lowlands basin

Minimizing and Managing Potential Impacts of Injection-Induced Seismicity from Class II Disposal Wells: Practical Approaches

Initial Borehole Drilling and Testing in or Near Ignace

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Coring Operations Basics

Model Inversion for Induced Seismicity

Coupled geomechanics and InSAR inversion of CO2 injection parameters

Western Kentucky Deep Saline Reservoir CO 2 Storage Test. Principal Investigators: J. Richard Bowersox - Lexington David A. Williams - Henderson

CO 2 Atlas Assessment of Geological Storage Potential

GHGT-10. Investigation of the effect of brine composition and ph buffer on CO 2 -Brine. Sequestration

Wettability of carbonate reservoir minerals under carbon storage conditions

Horda Platform Charge Atlas A MULTI-CLIENT STUDY

ENTERGY INDEPENDENCE PLANT EAST AND WEST RECYCLE PONDS DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH EPA CCR RULE SITING CRITERIA , FAULT AREAS.

WP 4.1. Site selection criteria and ranking methodology. Karen Kirk

Potentials for Mineral and Hydrocarbon Development in the Northern part of Greenland

Basin modeling: the key for unconventional shale gas assessment

Cosmic Ray Muon Tomography; A New Method for Monitoring Sweep in Oilfield Waterfloods?

Shale Gas:- What is it?, Where is it? How can we get it and when? Professor Peter Styles, Applied and Environmental Geophysics Research Group

CO 2 adsorption in coals as a function of rank and composition: A task in USGS research on geologic sequestration of CO 2

Outline 16: The Mesozoic World: Formation of Oil Deposits (with a side trip to the Devonian Marcellus Shale)

PRELIMINARY REPORT. Evaluations of to what extent CO 2 accumulations in the Utsira formations are possible to quantify by seismic by August 1999.

The Twin2Go Project: From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Towards adaptive water governance in river basins

Transcription:

U.S. Geological Survey National Geologic Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Assessment U.S. Geological Survey Department of the Interior

Outline for Presentatoin Introduction Overview of Legislation Geologic Model Methodology Current Assessment Activities

Source: DOE NETL, 2008, Carbon Sequestration Atlas II of the United States and Canada

What is Geologic CO 2 Sequestration? Duncan and others (2011)

Energy Independence and Security Act 2007 TITLE VII CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION Subtitle B Carbon Capture and Sequestration Assessment and Framework SEC. 711. CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION CAPACITY ASSESSMENT. (b) METHODOLOGY shall develop a methodology for conducting an assessment under subsection (f), taking into consideration (1) the geographical extent of all potential sequestration formations in all States; (2) the capacity of the potential sequestration formations; (3) the injectivity of the potential sequestration formations; (4) an estimate of potential volumes of oil and gas recoverable by injection and sequestration of industrial carbon dioxide in potential sequestration formations; (5) the risk associated with the potential sequestration formations; and (6) the work done to develop the Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada that was completed by DOE. (c) COORDINATION (1) Federal Coordination (2) State Coordination

Carbon Capture and Storage Capture: Flue gas is 5-15 % CO 2, must be separated for storage Compressed CO 2 for pipeline transport Geological storage: The USGS assessment will focus on CO 2 injected at depths of 3,000 to 13,000 ft CO 2 is buoyant and displaces existing water, oil, or gas Original source: Statoil. Online at: http://ioc3.unesco.org /oanet/faqocs.html Storage formation must be sealed to retain buoyant CO 2 USGS assessment methodology addresses buoyant and residual trapping

USGS Methodology Geologically-based, statistically-sound hypotheses for quantities of resource Comprehensive & consistent treatment (compatible/comparable to assessments in other areas) Transparent methodology, assumptions Probabilistic range of values to reflect uncertainty Not project site specific, estimates are regional (but geological models are developed for each region) External expert input

Salinity of water in storage formation must be > 10,000 ppm TDS per EPA regulations

Resource Triangle Technically accessible CO 2 storage resources

U.S. Department of Energy Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships (Brennan) Modified from DOE NETL 2008 Carbon Sequestration Atlas II of the United States and Canada Version 2 http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasii/

# Participate with no funding #

USGS Sedimentary Basins of Lower 48 States

Major Petroleum Systems and Assessed basins for CO2 storage Major Total Petroleum Systems Co-op States States

Final CO2 Assessment Report USGS Circular (model 1995 NOGA assessment report summary - Circ. 1118) Planned for 2013 On-line supporting data Maps with SAU boundaries Summary reports for each SAU Data will be released as available

Conclusions The USGS assessment methodology can estimate the technically accessible CO 2 storage resource at a variety of levels of uncertainty across a formation The methodology uses geologic data, processes, geologic models, and rock properties to populate probabilistic analysis models to produce a robust estimate of CO 2 storage resource within a Storage Assessment Unit (SAU) The assessment process is under way; USGS needs help from the Regional Partnerships and State geological surveys to complete the assessment in three years.

For more information contact: Brenda Pierce bpierce@usgs.gov 703-648-6421 Peter Warwick pwarwick@usgs.gov 703-648-6469 Sean Brennan sbrennan@usgs.gov 703-648-6434 http://energy.usgs.gov http://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/carbon_seq/ http://energy.er.usgs.gov/health_environment/co2_sequestration/ http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1127/