DEALUMNATON N STEAM Aufhor(s): Craig D. Hughest Andrea Labouriau Susan Neugebauer Crawford Robert Romero Jason Quirin* William L. Earl Chemical Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,New Mexico 87545. Current Address: Morton Thiokol Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah Current Address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, llinois * Submitfed to: 12* nternational Zeolite Conference July 5-10, 1998 Baltimore Md. Los Alamos NATONAL LABORATORY Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/equalopportunity employer, is operated by the Universityof California for the US Departmentof Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the US Government retains a nonexclusive,royally-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution. or to allow others to do so.for US Government purposes. The Los Alamos National Laboratoryrequeststhat the publisher identify this article as work performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy. Form No. 838 R5 Sr262Q10191
DSCLAMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employets, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, compbteness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise docs not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, mommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
DSCLAMER Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. mages are produced from the best available original document.
KNETCS OF ZEOLTE DEALUMNATON N STEAM. Authors: Craig D. Hughest, Andrea Labouriau, Susan Neugebauer Crawford, Robert Romero, Jason Quirinl, and William L. Earf. Chemical Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Current Address: Morton Thiokol Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah Current Address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, llinois * * Corresponding Author at: Mail Stop J5 14, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, Telephone (505)667-8132, FAX (505)665-4955, email wle@lanl.gov We have refined our *'A NMR capabilities to perform quantitative N M R with an internal standard. Using this analytical tool we are studying the rate of dealumination of ZSM-5 zeolites in a flow of steam at different temperatures. By making measurements of dealumination as a fitnetion of temperature we are able to extract the activation energy for the dealumination process. Preliminary results indicate that the activation energy for dealumination of H-ZSM-5 is about 46 kjoules/mole. We are working on more accurate measurements as well as extending this to cation substituted ZSM-5.
f!- KNETCS OF ZEOLTE DEALUMNATON N STEAM. Authors: Craig D. Hughest, Andrea Labouriau, Susan Neugebauer Crawford, Robert Romero, Jason Quirid, and William L. Earl'. Chemical Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Current Address: Morton Thiokol Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah * Current Address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, llinois NTRODUCTON Zeolite dealumination is a well known phenomenon that contributes to the deactivation or activation of catalysts in several different applications. The most obvious effect is in acid catalysis where dealumination under reaction conditions removes the Bronsted sites, thus deactivating the catalyst. However, steam treatment may result in detrital aluminum with catalytically active Lewis acid sites. Dealumination is also important in removing charge from zeolites which alters their adsorption properties. Of interest to our work is the fact that dealumination removes negative charge fkom the fiamework, thereby causing exchange cations to migrate out of the pores. We are interested in the use of cation exchanged zeolites as selective reduction catalysts for removal of NO, from exhaust streams, particularly from - automotive exhaust. n this case, copper exchanged ZSM-5 has been shown' to be an effective catalyst for the generic reaction of NO, with hydrocarbons. NO+HC N2+ C02+H20 However, high temperature and steam in combustion exhaust causes dealumination and consequent migration of copper out of the zeolite structure resulting in rapid deactivation of the catalyst. Dealumination of zeolites has been reported by many authors in uncountable papers and cannot be reviewed here. Nor is there a need for one more publication reporting on this deactivation mechanism. However, to our knowledge there are no reports on the kinetics of dealumination under varying conditions of temperature and steam. By measuring the kinetics of dealumination with different zeolites and exchange cations we expect to develop working models of the dealumination process that will allow control of zeolite deactivation. This manuscript is a description of the basic techniques used and a progress report on the very beginning of this study. EXPERMENTAL Since our primary concern is the dealumination and consequent deactivation of zeolite based automotive catalysts this study was performed on standard commercial ZSM-5 materials. The starting material was NJ&'-ZSM-5, CBV 3014, obtained from the PQ Corporation. t has a Si:Al ratio of about 17. n our experience, many zeolite samples contain extrafiamework aluminum. We have developed a routine method of
removing this detrital material by washing several times with aqueous 0.5 _M NH4F at 323 K. This procedure results in samples with no A N M R signal in the octahedral region (ca. 0 pprn). For our work, this is a good operational definition of no extraframework aluminum. Our original samples were prepared by steaming in a flow reactor capable of controlling humidity in the flow stream. Approximately 0.5 g of zeolite was placed in a 10 mm quartz tube in a tube furnace. The samples were slowly brought to the temperature of interest (10 K / min) in a flow of dry nitrogen gas. Once the temperature was reached, the flow was switched to 10% water. The time when the steam flow started was considered t=o for kinetic measurements. Samples were steamed for varying lengths of time. At the end of the time of interest, the flow was switched back to dry nitrogen, the furnace was turned off and opened to accelerate cooling. This results in a set of samples with different steaming times at different temperatures. We have recently constructed a new system based around a 2 inch quartz tube in a large tube furnace. Samples are placed on a frit in 8 mm quartz tubes inside the tube fbrnace. The gas flow is forced up through the frit and sample. n this system, samples can be placed in or removed from the fbrnace while the hrnace is at temperature. Or they can be calcined in dry nitrogen and the gas flow switched to any desired relative humidity. Humidity in the flow is accomplished by passing the nitrogen through a temperature controlled water bubbler. The gas flow tubing is heat traced after the bubbler to prevent condensation. The exact humidity is controlled by varying the mix of dry and wet nitrogen as well as by the temperature of the bubbler. Humidity is periodically measured with a Vaisala capacitative humidity probe. Samples prepared with this new steaming system are much better controlled and reproducible than the older system. N M R experiments are performed on a Varian Unity 400 N M R spectrometer operating at a nominal applied field of 9.4 T or equivalently a 27Al resonance fiequency of 104.21 Mhz. All spectra were obtained with Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) using a Varian 5 mm probe spinning between 7 and 10 khz. The x/2 pulse width is about 5 ps so a pulse width of 1 ps was used to insure complete excitation of the -% -+ % transitions for both the sample and the reference standard. We used different reference standards to calibrate the aluminum signal. Earlier experiments used a small piece of sapphire which has a resonance position at about 15 ppm, between the zeolite octahedral and tetrahedral aluminum signals. Later we standardized on AlN because it has a resonance at about 114 ppm, outside the range of both the tetrahedral and octahedral resonances. A small, weighed, piece of the reference standard was inserted in the center of the rotor and the total amount of zeolite in the rotor was also weighed so an accurate comparison of signal intensities could be made. Samples were prepared by hydrating the zeolite prior to taking the NMR spectrum. This was accomplished by placing the sample in an open vial and placing the vial in a closed container with water, i.e., 100% RH, for a minimum of three days.
RESULTS AND DSCUSSON Aluminum NMR Spectral ntensities: The NMR literature is full of discussions of aluminum NMR signal intensities and hidden signals. We will not attempt to review that literature in this forum but point the reader to the book by Engelhardt and Michel and a paper by Huggins and Ellis and literature cited in those. t is sufficient to note that if the symmetry of the aluminum site is low the electric quadrupole interaction becomes large resulting in extremely broad signals, undetectable in a normal MAS NMR experiment. t is our experience that the aluminum signal in zeolites can vanish under several different conditions. First: in very dry protonated zeolites there is sufficient distortion of the tetrahedral aluminum that the signal becomes broad and poorly defined. This distortion is borne out by theoretical studies of zeolite structure3. This is the reason that we are carefkl to hydrate all samples before taking their NMR spectra. Second: the extraframework aluminum from dealumination is a poorly defined mix of aluminum oxides and hydroxides. Even when hlly hydrated these have a very broad NMR resonance because of the dispersion of chemical shifts. We find it impossible to obtain quantitative NMR spectra of the detrital octahedral aluminum. n order to measure the extent of dealumination we resorted to quantifjrlng the tetrahedral aluminum by comparing its signal to a measured reference sample acquired at the same time. Figure 1 contains the spectrum of a hydrated as received ZSM-5 zeolite with a piece of sapphire and a piece of AlN to demonstrate the signal positions. A feature of using AlN ceramic is that we can insert a small chip in the center of the sample and after the NMR experiment it can be retrieved. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0-20 PFm FGURE 1 This method of spin counting allows us to follow the decrease in intensity of the tetrahedral resonance as a hnction of steaming conditions. After steaming we do not obtain an accurate mass balance by NMR presumably because of detrital (octahedral) aluminum that is so distorted that the relaxation times are very short or the signal is broadened and shifted to where it is undetected. n our quantitative work we assume
that all of the NMR signal in the 60 ppm (tetrahedral) region is from aluminum in the zeolite structure. We believe that after extensive rehydration virtually all of the extraframework aluminum is octahedral. t may also be argued that some of the signal at 60 ppm is due to aluminum which is only partially in the framework, i.e., aluminum which may have three bonds to the framework and the fourth to OH or OHZ. This may be true, but as an operational necessity, we assume that all signal in the 60 ppm region is due to aluminum in the framework. With these assumptions, we can measure the rate of dealumination at several temperatures by preparing samples which have been exposed to steam at those temperatures for different lengths of time. We have done this at 873, 973, and 1073 K. Figure 2 is an Arrhenius plot of the rates for H-ZSM-5, ix.,a plot of the rate versus inverse temperature. -4.0 -k - Activation Energy 46 kjoule / mole -4.5-5.0-5.5-6.0-6.5-7.0 1.0 1.1 13 13 1.4110~ 1 / T K-' FGURE 2 We obtain an activation energy E, of 46 kjoule per mole. We have not made a careful error analysis of this result because the data are very preliminary. We estimate that the error may be as large as 520 kcal per mole. The most likely source of error in these data is in determining the exact time of steaming. Our new steaming system should minimize experimental errors at which time we will perform a more carehl error analysis. CONCLUSONS By using carefbl *'Al NMR techniques the extent of dealumination of zeolites can be accurately measured. From these methods an Arrhenius activation energy of 46 kjoule per mole was obtained for the dealumination of H-ZSM-5. REFERENCES 1) Engelhardt, G.; Michel, D. High-Resolution Solid-state N M R of Silicates and Zeolites; New York, John Wiley & Sons, (1989) 2) Huggins, B. A.; Ellis, P.D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,114, 2098. 3) Redondo, A.; Hay, P. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1993,97, 11754.