September 16, 2010 Magnetic surveying

Similar documents
What have we learned from the Case Histories

Magnetic Case Study: Raglan Mine Laura Davis May 24, 2006

C5 Magnetic exploration methods data analysis techniques

Magnetics: Fundamentals and Parameter Extraction

2c. No incident magnetic field. 2d. Earth's field causes material to become magnetized.

EOS 350 MIDTERM OCT 4, 2013 STUDENT NAME: TEAM #:

Magnetic field nomenclature

MT Prospecting. Map Resistivity. Determine Formations. Determine Structure. Targeted Drilling

224 D4 Instrumentation and data collection techniques for magnetic exploration

Final Review session 2

Downloaded 01/09/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

Geophysics foundations: Seeing underground: Introduction

Enhancing exploration opportunities at Broken Hill with airborne gravity gradiometry

GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Plate Tectonics - Geomagnetism, Earthquakes, and Gravity

ENVI.2030L - Plate Tectonics - Geomagnetism, Earthquakes, and Gravity

SUMMARY METHODOLOGY. 1 + (1 η)(ıωτ) c

AP Physics C. Magnetism - Term 4

Parkin Offset Properties. Sudbury, Ontario

EXTREMELY FAST IP USED TO DELINEATE BURIED LANDFILLS. Norman R. Carlson, Cris Mauldin Mayerle, and Kenneth L. Zonge

CHAPTER FOUR GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION

Magnetic and Gravity Methods for Geothermal Exploration

Lecture 2. Dipole-Axis-Dependent Coordinate Systems and Near Earth's Magnetic Field

Department of Geophysics Faculty of Earth Sciences King Abdulaziz University

PRESENTATION TITLE. Drone Magnetic Site Surveys To Verify Wellhead Locations David M. Velozzi 9/27/18

Intro to magnetic methods

Physics 1A. Lecture 1B

Student Exploration: Electromagnetic Induction


MAGNETIC MODELING OF THE SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE OF SHIP ROCK, NEW MEXICO

Separation of regional and residual magnetic field data

Darnley Bay Resources Preliminary Airborne Survey Results

GE 2400 Test #2 3/26/03. Name

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

A New Direction. Copper-Gold Deposit at Thor TSX.V:COL. August 11, May 2013

1D and 2D Inversion of the Magnetotelluric Data for Brine Bearing Structures Investigation

Available online Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2016, 3(2):1-7. Research Article

Saskatchewan s Mineral Resources Lesson: Exploring for Minerals in Saskatchewan: Geophysics Using Magnetics to Find a Mine

KEMESS SOUTH MAGNETIC MODELING. CONDOR CONSULTING, INC. OCTOBER 2017

Titiribi Gold: Sleeping Giant in the Colombian Cordilleras (a Geophysical Study)

Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and. the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore

CULTURAL EDITING OF HRAM DATA COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, no. 1&2, vol. 34, 1998, pp.

3. Magnetic Methods / 62

The Self-Compensating Magnetometer (SCM) System Test Results from a Remus 600 AUV Survey in Yellowstone Lake. Matthew Kowalczyk Feb 15, 2017

For personal use only

Chapter 4 Multipole model of the Earth's magnetic field

EOSC 350: Environmental, Geotechnical and Exploration Geophysics I

Activity 19 Magnetic Magnitude Changes

Use of Geostatistically-constrained Potential Field Inversion and Downhole Drilling to Predict Distribution of Sulphide and Uranium Mineralisation

Horizontal gradient and band-pass filter of aeromagnetic data image the subsurface structure; Example from Esh El Mellaha Area, Gulf of Suez, Egypt.

EOSC350 Environmental, Geotechnical and Exploration Geophysics I

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT THE CAVZ CLAIMS

Airborne Geophysical Survey Report River Jordan Property

AP Physics C. Electricity - Term 3

Towed Streamer EM data from Barents Sea, Norway

Reduction to the Pole of Magnetic Anomalies Using Analytic Signal. A.H. Ansari and K. Alamdar

Main Menu. Douglas Oldenburg University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada

Mine Scale Constrained Geophysical Inversion; A Case Study at the Darlot-Centenary Gold Mine

Lesson 7: The Mean as a Balance Point

Optimizing Geophysical Inversions for Archean Orogenic Gold Settings

Introduction to Vectors

APPENDIX A: Magnetotelluric Data in Relation to San Pedro Mesa Structural. The San Pedro Mesa structural high (discussed in main text of paper) was

Junior Uranium explorer in the Athabasca Basin. Patterson Claims

SEG/San Antonio 2007 Annual Meeting

In such cases, direction may be used for the location of a point by any of the following methods:

ANALYSIS OF LOCALIZED HIGH MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ZONES AT JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDIANA

Achieving depth resolution with gradient array survey data through transient electromagnetic inversion

The Cerattepe Massive Sulphide Property, Northeastern Turkey

Report. On a 3D Magnetic Inversion. For. Cadillac Ventures Ltd. And. Newcastle Minerals Ltd. Pickle Lake Project. Ontario, Canada

Kiska Metals Corporation Project Updates

KING EDWARD POINT OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA

3D Geometry of the Xade Complex inferred from Gravity and Magnetic Data

Intro to magnetic methods

CORPORATE UPDATE. Feasibility Study being finalised for completion towards the end of April.

Lecture 4. Things we might want to know about the geomagnetic field. Components of the geomagnetic field. The geomagnetic reference field

West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2V6 Tel: Fax: TSX-V: GBR NEWS RELEASE

GEOPACIFIC REPORTS HIGH GOLD VALUES IN AUGER SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE QALAU AND TATAIYA PROSPECTS, RAKI RAKI PROJECT,

KING EDWARD POINT OBSERVATORY MAGNETIC DATA

Your work from these three exercises will be due Thursday, March 2 at class time.

MEMORANDUM. Interpretation of Magnetic and Volterra-3DIP survey MC Claims

Copper Reef to Drill Massive Sulphide Targets in Flin Flon

Electronic Geophysical Surveys LirJted, 250 South Fell Avenue, North Burnahy 2, B. C. Telenhone:

EOSC 110 Reading Week Activity, February Visible Geology: Building structural geology skills by exploring 3D models online

Interval (meters) To (meters)

C3: Magnetic anomalies produced by simple geological structures. Remember that objects can acquire both induced and remnant magnetization.

STRONG GOLD IN SOIL ANOMALY OUTLINED AT MARY HARRISON PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

For personal use only

Airborne gravity gradiometer surveying of petroleum systems under Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania

Hermanus Magnetic Observatory

Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture. Euler deconvolution of 3D gravity data interpretation: New approach

9/4/2018. Electric Field Models. Electric Field of a Point Charge. The Electric Field of Multiple Point Charges

Electric Field Models

Predictive Modelling of Ag, Au, U, and Hg Ore Deposits in West Texas Carl R. Stockmeyer. December 5, GEO 327G

Multi-source inversion of TEM data: with field applications to Mt. Milligan

Foundations of Math II Unit 5: Solving Equations

UBC-GIF: Capabilities for EM Modelling and Inversion of LSBB data

704,000 OUNCE MIYABI GOLD PROJECT UPDATE

Understanding Positional Astronomy Part 2 Celestial Co-ordinates Difficulty: Intermediate

Quantitative Magnetization Vector Inversion

Strategic Phase 2 Exploration Program Launched at Island Gold High-Grade Resource Potential Identified Laterally and at Depth

Logistics Report on a BH UTEM 4 Survey in Elliot Lake, Ontario area for International Montoro Resources, Inc.

Transcription:

September 16, 2010 Magnetic surveying After today, you will be able to Sketch anomalies over objects at any location, and explain how you derived the pattern. Explain the relation between dipoles and real targets. Outline the needs of a field survey. Outline necessary & some optional processing. Slide 1

Basics of Magnetics Surveying 1. Earth s magnetic field is the source: 2. Materials in the earth become magnetized (M = κh where H = B/0) (dipole moment per unit volume) 3. Magnetized material creates anomalous field (applet) magnetic moment m = M x (volume) 4. Magnetometer measures the total field 5. Anomalous field obtained by subtracting off the earth s field

Magnetics Earth s field Web Notes, GPG Ch.3.d.7. How is the field described anywhere? X, Y, Z Inclination, Declination, Magnitude Compass? Inclination? Declination? Earth s field strength vs anomalies. Slide 3

Earth s magnetic field: Strength B Inclination I Declination D Total Field Strength (nt) Declination (degrees) Inclination (degrees) B max = 70,000 nt H max = 55.7A/m B min = 20,000 nt H min = 15.9A/m http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/seg/gmag/igrfpg.pl

Magnetic field due to a dipole A dipole is the basic quantity in magnetostatics

Drawing the field due to burried dipoles Use the java applet on the website: Via GPG 8.c Start the applet alone here Or via: http://www.eos.ubc.ca/courses/eosc350/content/exe rcises/meth_3a/dipoleapp.html (there will be a link on the main EOSC 350 page)

Examples

Basics of Magnetics Surveying 1. Earth s magnetic field is the source: 2. Materials in the earth become magnetized (M = κh where H = B/0) (dipole moment per unit volume) 3. Magnetized material creates anomalous field (applet) magnetic moment m = M x (volume) 4. Magnetometer measures the total field 5. Anomalous field obtained by subtracting off the earth s field

The Anomalous field B 0 B A Measured field B = B 0 + B A Therefore components are: B AX = B X - B 0X, B AY = B Y - B 0Y, B AZ = B Z - B 0Z The total field anomaly: B = B - B 0 If B A << B 0 then B (BA Bˆ 0 ) That is, total field anomaly B is the projection of the anomalous field onto the direction of the inducing field.

Details on Anomalous Field See GPG d.8 Principles (anomalous fields)

Magnetics Data What exactly is measured? GPG Ch.3.d.1. The total field magnetic anomaly. Consequently, what pattern of response can be expected for buried targets? (sketch on BB) Start simple buried dipole. GPG Ch.3.d.2. Response to shallow or deep dipole targets. Response near magnetic poles near magnetic equator. Slide 11

Examples

Homework and Readings Magnetics GPG 3.d.0 3.d.13 Use the Java Applet to investigate the field due to burried dipoles @ GPG 8.c http://www.eos.ubc.ca/courses/eosc350/conte nt/exercises/meth_3a/dipoleapp.html Slide 13

Processing Magnetic Field data Account for time variations (need a base station) Remove regional

Magnetics Earth s field Slide 15

Time Variations of the Earth s Field External sources Solar wind (micro-seconds, minutes, hours) Solar storms (hours, days, months) Man made sources Power lines (50/60 Hz plus harmonics) DC Motors, generators All electronic equipment Internal sources Fluctuations in core (days millions of years)

Field procedures Earth s magnetic field varies as a function of time Necessary to record the magnetic field at a fixed location to determine the Earth s field

Base station correction Set out another magnetometer (base station) Assume time variations at the base stations are the same as at the observation location Synchronize the times Perform a correction by subtraction

Anomalous field We measure the field at the Earth s surface but we are interested in the anomalous features Regional removal

Example of regional field removal Airborne magnetic data gathered over a 25 square km area around a mineral deposit in central British Columbia. Some geological structural information is shown as black lines. The monzonite stock in the centre of the boxed region is a magnetic body, but this is not very clear in the data before removing the regional trend.

Summary: Data Collection Now we know what is measured. How to make measurements? Requirements: Base station. Positioning & time tied to each measurement. Measurement while moving. Identify potential noise sources. Slide 21

Possible routes to extracting information Plot the data in various map displays Interpret with a dipole Interpret with simple bodies of uniform magnetization Interpret as complex bodies (inversion)

Aeromagnetic map construction

Essential airborne data preparation (processing) Levelling data maps adjustingline locations decorregation drapping What can be learned directly? Trends Contacts Geologic settings Slide 24

Positioning errors of flight lines (old data)

Essential airborne data preparation (processing) Recall Drapping De-corrugation and Levelling Decorrugation is a frequency domain procedure based on a directional cosine filter. This filter retains anomalies, from gridded data, in the flight line direction only. Source: http://gdcinfo.agg.nrcan.gc.ca/gdc/yukon_lev/index_e.html Slide 26

Essential airborne data preparation (processing) Plotting Editing Drapping Source: http://gdcinfo.agg.nrcan.gc.ca/gdc/yukon_lev/index_e.html Slide 27

The entire data set is available as a 200 m grid which is updated annually to reflect recent data acquisition. $45 from the Canadian government

Essential airborne data preparation (processing) Residual total magnetic field Reduced to pole What can be learned directly? Trends Contacts Geologic settings Slide 29

Processing needed before interpreting Required Temporal correction Remove regional if present. Noise suppression Optional Filtering to emphasize edges, other features. GPG Ch.3.d.6. Mt Milligan, BC. GPG Ch.6.d.1 Slide 30

Reduction to Pole Same object buried at different locations on the earth yields different total field anomalies. Inclination=0 Inclination=45 Inclination=90

Reduction to Pole Filter the data to emulate the response as if the survey was taken at the pole. (Earth s field is vertical; measure vertical component of the anomalous field) 2D Fourier Filter This simplifies interpretation. Causative body lies beneath the peak.

Possible routes to extracting information Plot the data in various map displays Interpret with a dipole Interpret with simple bodies of uniform magnetization Interpret as complex bodies (inversion)

Environmental: How do we find UXO??

Northing (m) Environmental : Magnetic Survey 50 nt 40 30 20 200 100 0-100 Ferrex 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Easting (m) -200 TM4

Eg of dipoles UXO data http://www.eos.ubc.ca/research/ubcgif/uxo/software.html Slide 36

Possible routes to extracting information Plot the data in various map displays Interpret with a dipole Interpret with simple bodies of uniform magnetization Interpret as complex bodies (inversion)

Magnetic Charges (or Poles) (GPG d3 & d8) A magnetic charge creates a magnetic field H

Magnetic Charges (or Poles) In nature: magnetic poles always appear in pairs with a positive and negative pole yielding a dipole. Magnetic moment Magnetic field of dipole Magnetic field of dipole is identical to field from a loop of current

Beyond dipoles real targets When is a buried feature like a simple dipole? When it s diameter is much less than depth to it s centre. GPG Ch.3.d.3. Ch.3.d.4. Ch.3.d.5. Fields from some buried bodies, (cylinders, dykes) can be estimated by using charge concepts. Charge strength = M nˆ Slide 40

Magnetics Interpretation 2D modelling Forward modelling Line profiles might indicate 2D structure First identify the feature of interest Analyse data perpendicular to the structure Forward model in 2D Slide 41

Interpetation using Forward modelling: Response depends on K and size / shape. Solution is non-unique EOSC 350 06 Slide 42

Possible routes to extracting information Plot the data in various map displays Interpret with a dipole Interpret with simple bodies of uniform magnetization Interpret as complex bodies (inversion)

Superposition for Magnetics Data (GPG d5) Magnetic field for one prism Magnetic field for 5 prisms

Earth can be complicated A complicated earth model Magnetic data for a complicated earth model. To interpret field data from a complicated earth we need to have formal inversion procedures that recognize non-uniqueness.

Example: Raglan aeromagnetic data Select a region of interest. Keep data set size within reason. Digitized the Earth up to 10 6 cells. Slide 46

Inversion: Finding an earth model that generated the data? Inversion Divide the earth into many cells of constant but unknown susceptibility Solve the large inverse problem to estimate the value of each cell Slide 47

Misfit: comparing predictions to measurements Once a model is estimated Calculate data caused by that model. Compare predictions to these measurements. Is comparison within errors? YES Compare NO Modify model and try again Proceed to check for acceptibility Slide 48

Raglan aeromagnetic data Estimate a model for the distribution of subsurface magnetic material. Model will be smooth, and close to pre-defined reference. Display result as cross sections and as isosurfaces.?? Are sills connected at depth? Inversion result supports this idea. It helped justify a 1050m drill hole. 330m of peridotite intersected at 650m 10m were ore grade. Image shows all material which has k > 0.04 SI. Slide 49

Summary: Magnetics interpretation 1. Qualitative: Correlate magnetic patterns to geology 2. Quantitative interpretation Determine shapes, volumes, contacts, materials 3. Direct interpretation of patterns 4. Forward modelling 1. Guess geology 2. Calculate result - Compare to data 3. Iterate. 5. Inversion: Given data, estimate possible configurations of susceptible material that could cause those data. Slide 50

Homework and Readings Magnetics GPG 3.d.0 3.d.13 Use the Java Applet to investigate the field due to buried dipoles @ GPG 8.c Quiz/Teamwork exercise Wednesday Sept 21 Slide 51

What s missing: Estimates of depth of burial for various objects (sphere, cylinder) EOSC 350 06 Slide 52