Topological Matter, Strings, K-theory and related areas September 2016

Similar documents
Free fermion and wall-crossing

Topological vertex and quantum mirror curves

Arithmetic and physics of Higgs moduli spaces

Moduli spaces of sheaves and the boson-fermion correspondence

Integrable structure of various melting crystal models

Refined Chern-Simons Theory, Topological Strings and Knot Homology

Refined Donaldson-Thomas theory and Nekrasov s formula

Localization and Conjectures from String Duality

String Duality and Moduli Spaces

Duality Chern-Simons Calabi-Yau and Integrals on Moduli Spaces. Kefeng Liu

Vertex operator realization of some symmetric functions

W-algebras, moduli of sheaves on surfaces, and AGT

String Duality and Localization. Kefeng Liu UCLA and Zhejiang University

1 Electrons on a lattice, with noisy electric field

Littlewood Richardson polynomials

Topological Strings and Donaldson-Thomas invariants

Localization and Duality

Statistical Mechanics & Enumerative Geometry:

Enumerative Invariants in Algebraic Geometry and String Theory

Localization and Conjectures from String Duality

Combinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n

Knot Homology from Refined Chern-Simons Theory

Generalised Rogers Ramanujan identities and arithmetics. Ole Warnaar School of Mathematics and Physics

I. Why Quantum K-theory?

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

Combinatorics for algebraic geometers

Instanton counting, Donaldson invariants, line bundles on moduli spaces of sheaves on rational surfaces. Lothar Göttsche ICTP, Trieste

Monodromy of the Dwork family, following Shepherd-Barron X n+1. P 1 λ. ζ i = 1}/ (µ n+1 ) H.

Enumerative Geometry: from Classical to Modern

Catalan functions and k-schur positivity

Counting curves on a surface

Gromov-Witten invariants and Algebraic Geometry (II) Jun Li

The tangent space to an enumerative problem

Supersymmetric gauge theory, representation schemes and random matrices

BPS states, Wall-crossing and Quivers

Hilbert scheme intersection numbers, Hurwitz numbers, and Gromov-Witten invariants

Instantons and Donaldson invariants

Elements of Topological M-Theory

Integrable structure of melting crystal model with two q-parameters

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 5 Aug 2016

The (q, t)-catalan Numbers and the Space of Diagonal Harmonics. James Haglund. University of Pennsylvania

UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works

Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r

Refined Cauchy/Littlewood identities and partition functions of the six-vertex model

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 4 Dec 2006

Extended Conformal Symmetry and Recursion Formulae for Nekrasov Partition Function

Geometry of the Calabi-Yau Moduli

PERMUTATION-EQUIVARIANT QUANTUM K-THEORY IV. D q -MODULES

Weighted Hurwitz numbers and hypergeometric τ-functions

Remarks on Chern-Simons Theory. Dan Freed University of Texas at Austin

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

Topological String Theory

Curve counting and generating functions

NOTES ON FOCK SPACE PETER TINGLEY

DEFECTS IN COHOMOLOGICAL GAUGE THEORY AND DONALDSON- THOMAS INVARIANTS

Introduction Curves Surfaces Curves on surfaces. Curves and surfaces. Ragni Piene Centre of Mathematics for Applications, University of Oslo, Norway

Knots and Mirror Symmetry. Mina Aganagic UC Berkeley

Torus Knots and q, t-catalan Numbers

Cohomology jump loci of quasi-projective varieties

On free fermions and plane partitions

G 2 manifolds and mirror symmetry

A note on quantum products of Schubert classes in a Grassmannian

The geometry of Landau-Ginzburg models

RAQ2014 ) TEL Fax

Generalized N = 1 orientifold compactifications

Knot invariants, Hilbert schemes and Macdonald polynomials (joint with A. Neguț, J. Rasmussen)

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

LOCALIZATION AND DUALITY. 1. Introduction

Donaldson-Thomas invariants

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons

What elliptic cohomology might have to do with other generalized Schubert calculi

Suppose A h is a flat family of non-commutative algebras, such that A 0 is commutative.

Cylindric Young Tableaux and their Properties

COUNTING COVERS OF AN ELLIPTIC CURVE

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 15 Jul 2018

Riemann-Hilbert problems from Donaldson-Thomas theory

arxiv: v4 [math.ag] 12 Feb 2016

Mirror symmetry and Langlands duality in the non-abelian Hodge theory of a curve arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 24 Jun 2004

Lecture 1: Introduction

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Jun 2016

Mirror symmetry, Langlands duality and the Hitchin system

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

ON THE INTERSECTION THEORY OF QUOT SCHEMES AND MODULI OF BUNDLES WITH SECTIONS

Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory, I

LECTURES ON DONALDSON-THOMAS THEORY

Constructing compact 8-manifolds with holonomy Spin(7)

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Cluster varieties for tree-shaped quivers and their cohomology

Recent Results on the Moduli Spaces of Riemann Surfaces

The Yang-Mills equations over Klein surfaces

Counting surfaces of any topology, with Topological Recursion

On the intersection theory of the moduli space of rank two bundles

Signatures of GL n Multiplicity Spaces

10 l-adic representations

Counting black hole microstates as open string flux vacua

The derived category of a GIT quotient

Frobenius Manifolds and Integrable Hierarchies

Gromov-Witten theory of A n -resolutions

Deligne s functorial Riemann-Roch theorem

Transcription:

Topological Matter, Strings, K-theory and related areas 26 30 September 2016

This talk is based on joint work with from Caltech.

Outline 1. A string theorist s view of 2. Mixed Hodge polynomials associated with

The infinite wedge space Let V be a linear space with basis {k} k Z+ 1 2 A semi-infinite monomial v S is an expression of the form v S = s 1 s 2 s 3 where the s i Z + 1 2, s i > s i+1 and s i s i+1 = 1 for i 1. We say that v S has charge c if s i = c i + 1 2 for i 1 Examples: 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 2 c = 0 and 7 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 c = 2 5 2 1 2 7 2 9 2 11 2 c = 1

The infinite wedge space (or fermionic Fock space) Λ 2 V is the linear space with basis {v S }, equipped with an inner product for which this basis is orthonormal. The wedging operator ψ k, k Z + 1 2 is defined by ψ k : Λ 2 V Λ 2 V, f k f Together with its adjoint, the contraction operator ψk (which sign-removes k ), this yields the anti-commutation relations of the infinite Clifford algebra: { ψk, ψl } { } { = δkl, ψk, ψ l = ψ k, ψl } = 0 Obviously, ψ k ψ k (v S ) = { v S if k S 0 otherwise ψ k ψ k (v S ) = { v S if k S 0 otherwise

Using the free fermions ψ k and ψk one can further define the free bosons α n = ψ k n ψk n Z \ {0} k Z+ 1 2 with Heisenberg commutation relations and adjoint a n = a n. [α n, α m ] = nδ n, m Finally we use these to define the vertex operators ( z n ) Γ ± (z) = exp n α ±n n 1

Partitions The infinite wedge space Λ 2 V is a direct sum of charge-c subspaces ( Λ ) 2 V = Λ 2 V c Z The semi-infinite monomials spanning each subspace are in one-to-one correspondence with integer partitions: If v S = s 1 s 2 s 3 has charge c then the partition corresponding to v S is Examples: λ = (λ 1, λ 2,... ) where λ i = s i + i c 1 2 c = 0 1 2 3 2 5 2 7 2 9 2 λ = 0 c and 7 c = 2 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 5 2 λ = (2, 1) c = 1 5 2 1 2 7 2 9 2 11 2 λ = (3, 2)

For c = 0 Okounkov introduced the following graphical description obtained by rotating a partition, such as (8, 5, 4, 2, 2, 1) = by 135 to get 15 2 7 2 3 2 0 3 2 5 2 9 2 13 2

Using partitions to represent the charge-0 semi-infinite monomials and adopting bra and ket notation, for n 1 the operators α n and α n act on λ by adding/deleting border strips of length n, weighted by the factor ( 1) h+1 where h is the height of the border strip. α 3 1 (2,1,1) (5,1,1) (3,3,1) (2,1,1,1,1) 2 + 3 α 3 (2, 1, 1) = (5, 1, 1) (3, 3, 1) + (2, 1, 1, 1, 1)

Accordingly, the vertex operators Γ ± (z) satisfy Γ (z) µ = λ µ z λ µ λ and Γ + (z) λ = µ λ z λ µ µ where a pair of partitions λ, µ is interlacing, denoted as λ µ, if λ 1 µ 1 λ 2 µ 2 (8, 5, 2, 1) (5, 3, 1, 1)

Schur functions The Schur functions s λ (x 1, x 2,..., x n ) are the characters of the irreducible polynomial representations of GL(n, C) of highest weight λ. For λ, µ partitions such that µ λ, the skew Schur function s λ/µ (x) may be computed combinatorially as s λ/µ (x) = T x T where the sum is over semi-standard Young tableaux on {1, 2, 3,..., n} of skew shape λ/µ. For example s (3,2,2)/(2,1) (x 1, x 2 ) = 1 1 2 1 + 1 2 2 2 + 1 1 2 2 + 1 2 2 1 = x 1 x 2 (x 2 1 + x 2 2 ) + 2x 2 1 x 2 2

Since a semi-standard Young tableaux of shape λ/µ on {1, 2,..., n} is in one-to-one correspondence with sequences of interlacing partitions µ = λ (0) λ (1) λ (2) λ (n) = λ 1 1 2 1 (2,1) (3,2,1) (3,2,1) (3,2,2) λ (0) = (2, 1) = µ λ (1) = (3, 2, 1) λ (2) = (3, 2, 2) = λ we have s λ/µ (x) = λ (0) λ (1) λ (n) λ (0) =µ λ (n) =λ x λ(1) λ (0) 1 x λ(2) λ (1) 2 x λ(n) λ (n 1) n Hence λ Γ (x i ) µ = µ Γ + (x i ) λ = s λ/µ (x 1, x 2,... ) i 1 i 1

3-dimensional partitions A plane partition or 3-dimensional partition is a two-dimensional array of nonnegative integers such that the numbers are weakly decreasing from left to right and from top to bottom, and such that finitely many numbers are positive. Geometrically, a plane partition may also be thought of as a configuration of stacked unit cubes, such that... For example, 4 3 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 2 1 and represent the same plane partition of 26.

A famous result of MacMahon is the following closed-form formula for the generating function of plane partitions q π = 1 (1 q n ) n π n 1 where π is the number of unit cubes in π. Okounkov and Reshetikhin showed that the above formula follows as a straightforward application of the vertex operators Γ ± (z).

Given a plane partition 5 3 2 1 4 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 we can read off its sequence of diagonal slices to obtain a sequence of interlacing partitions 0 (1) (2, 1) (4, 1) (5, 2, 1) (3, 1) (2) (1) 0

Each partition λ in the sequence of diagonal slices contributes q λ to the weight q π of π. For this we need the operator Q λ = q λ λ which q-commutes with the vertex operators Γ ± (z): Γ ± (z) Q = Q Γ ± (zq ±1 ) Putting this all together yields q π ( = 0 Γ+ (1)Q ) ( Γ (1)Q ) 0 π i 1 i 1 = Γ + (z)γ (1/w) = = n 1 1 (1 q n ) n 1 1 z/w Γ (z)γ + (1/w)

In their work on the limit shape of 3- d partitions, Okounkov, Reshetikhin and Vafa introduced the following model for 3-d partitions: λ = (3, 2) N 1 = 16 µ = (3, 1) N 2 = 16 ν = (3, 1, 1) N 3 = 16 P(λ, µ, ν) := lim N q N1 λ N2 µ N3 ν P N1,N 2,N 3 (λ, µ, ν) 1,N 2,N 3

Okounkov, Reshetikhin and Vafa first let N 3 and then again read off the sequence of diagonal slices, now of the form λ µ with possible shapes of the slices determined by the choice of ν. Using the vertex operator formalism, they then show that ) n(µ) n(ν ) P(λ, µ, ν) = q n(λ n 1 (1 qn ) n s ν (q ρ ) η q η s λ /η(q ν+ρ )s µ/η (q ν +ρ ) where n(λ) = i 1 (i 1)λ i, ρ = (0, 1, 2,... ) and f (q λ+ρ ) = f (q λ1+0, q λ2+1, q λ3+2,... ) For λ = µ = ν = 0 this simplifies to MacMahon s formula.

The Nekrasov Okounkov formula The topological vertex C λµν (q) was introduced by Aganagic, Klemm, Marino and Vafa to compute Gromov Witten and Donaldson Thomas invariants of toric Calabi Yau threefolds. It may be expressed in terms of skew Schur functions as C λµν (q) = q n(λ) n(λ )+n(ν) n(ν )+ 1 2 ( λ + µ + ν ) s ν (q ρ ) q η ( s λ /η q ν+ρ ) ( s µ/η q ν +ρ ) η Comparing this with the Okounkov Reshetikhin Vafa formula we get C λµν (q) = q n(λ)+n(µ)+n(ν)+ 1 2 ( λ + µ + ν ) P(λ, µ, ν) n 1 (1 q n ) n Since P(λ, µ, ν) clearly is cyclically symmetric, we may infer that C λµν (q) = C µνλ (q) = C νλµ (q)

The hook-length h(s) of a square s λ is the number of squares immediately to the right and below s, including s itself. For example, the square s = (3, 2) = in (8, 7, 7, 6, 4, 3, 1) has hook-length 9. Using the cyclic symmetry of the topological vertex to compute the sum T λ ( u) λ µ C 0λµ (q)c 0λ µ (q) λ,µ in two different ways yields T λ λ s λ (1 uq h(s) )(1 u 1 q h(s) ) (1 q h(s) ) 2 = k,r 1 (1 uq r T k ) r (1 u 1 q r T k ) r (1 q r 1 T k ) r (1 q r+1 T k ) r

Setting u = q z and letting q tend to 1 yields the Nekrasov Okounkov formula for an arbitrary power of the Dedekind η-function k 1(1 T k ) z2 1 = λ T ) (1 λ z2 h(s) 2 s λ z C

Mixed Hodge polynomials of character varieties In the following we are interested in the affine variety M n := { A 1, B 1,..., A g, B g GL(n, C) : A 1 B 1 A 1 1 B 1 1 A g B g A 1 g B 1 g = ζ n I } //GL(n, C) where g is a nonnegative integer, ζ n a primitive nth-root of unity and // a GIT quotient. M n is the twisted character variety of a closed Riemann surface Σ of genus g with points the twisted homomorphisms from π 1 (Σ) to GL(n, C) modulo conjugation. It is nonsingular of dimension d n given by d n = 2n 2 (g 1) + 2 g 1 Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas considered the problem of computing the Poincaré polynomials P(M n ; t) = i b i (M n )t i with b i (M n ) the Betti numbers of M n extending earlier work of Hitchin (n = 2) and Gothen (n = 3).

M n admits a mixed Hodge structure (in the sense of Deligne) on its cohomology which is of diagonal type. Hence its (mixed) Hodge polynomial, which is a 3-parameter deformation of the Poincaré polynomial, is effectively a 2-variable polynomial, H(M n ; q, t). Moreover P(M n ; t) = H(M n ; 1, t) E(M n ; q) = q dn H(M n ; 1/q, 1) where E(M n ; q) is the E-polynomial of M n, counting the number of points of M n when considered over the finite field F q instead of C. More generally, Hausel and Rodriguez-Villegas tried to get a handle on H(M n ; q, t).

We refine the hook-length of a square s λ by defining the arm-length a(s) and leg-length l(s) as the number of squares immediately to the right respectively below s, excluding s itself. Hence h(s) = a(s) + l(s) + 1. For example, the square s = (3, 3) = arm-length 4 and leg-length 3. in (8, 7, 7, 6, 4, 3, 1) has

Defining the function H n (u, q, t) = H n (u, q, t; g) by T λ t (1 g)(2n(λ)+ λ ) ((1 uq a(s)+1 t l(s) )(1 u 1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 )) g (1 q a(s)+1 t l(s) )(1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 ) λ s λ ( H n (u, q, t)t n ) = Exp (1 q)(t 1 1) where Exp is a plethystic exponential; if f (u, q, t; T ) = n 1 n 1 c n (u, q, t)t n then Example Exp ( f (u, q, t; T ) ) ( = exp n 1 ( T ) Exp = 1 1 T 1 T n n 1 f (u n, q n, t n ; T n ) ) n

Conjecture. (Hausel, Rodriguez-Villegas) The mixed Hodge polynomial of M n is given by H ( M n ; q, t ) = (q 1/2 t) dn H n ( t 1, qt 2, q ) In the genus-0 case M n consists of a single point for n = 1 and has no points for n > 1. Hence H(M n ; q, t) = δ n,1 which is consistent with the conjecture. Theorem. (Rains SOW, Carlsson Rodriguez-Villegas (2016)) The conjecture holds for genus g = 1.

Proof. The following q, t-analogue of the Nekrasov Okounkov formula holds: Theorem. T λ λ s λ = (1 uq a(s)+1 t l(s) )(1 u 1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 ) (1 q a(s)+1 t l(s) )(1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 ) i,j,k 1 (1 uq i t j 1 T k )(1 u 1 q i 1 t j T k ) (1 q i 1 t j 1 T k )(1 q i t j T k ) This may either be proved using Macdonald polynomial theory or the equivariant Dijkgraaf Moore Verlinde Verlinde (DMVV) formula for the Hilbert scheme of n points in the plane, (C 2 ) [n], due to Waelder.

Let (u 1, u 2 ) be the equivariant parameters of the natural torus action on (C 2 ) [n], and set q := e 2πiu1 and t := e 2πiu2. Let Ell ( (C 2 ) [n] ; u, p, q, t ) be the equivariant elliptic genus of (C 2 ) [n], where p := exp(2πiτ) and u := exp(2πiz) for τ H and z C. According to the equivariant DMVV formula: T n Ell ( (C 2 ) [n] ; u, p, q, t ) n 0 = m 0 k 1 l,n 1,n 2 Z 1 (1 p m T k u l q n1 t n2 ) c(km,l,n1,n2) The integers c(m, l, n 1, n 2 ) are determined by the equivariant elliptic genus of C 2 given by where Ell(C 2, u, p, q, t) = θ(uq; p)θ(u 1 t; p) θ(q; p)θ(t; p) = c(m, l, n 1, n 2 )p m u l q n1 t n2 m 0 l,n 1,n 2 Z θ(u; p) := k Z( u) k p (k 2)

Li, Liu and Zhou obtained an explicit formula in terms of arm- and leg-lengths for the generating function (over n) of elliptic genera of the framed moduli spaces M(r, n) of torsion-free sheaves on P 2 of rank r and c 2 = n. Since M(1, n) coincides with (C 2 ) [n] this implies T n Ell ( (C 2 ) [n] ; u, p, q, t ) n 0 = λ T λ s λ This gives the elliptic Nekrasov Okounkov formula T λ s λ λ = m 0 θ(uq a(s)+1 t l(s) ; p)θ(u 1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 ; p) θ(q a(s)+1 t l(s) ; p)θ(q a(s) t l(s)+1 ; p) θ(uq a(s)+1 t l(s) ; p)θ(u 1 q a(s) t l(s)+1 ; p) θ(q a(s)+1 t l(s) ; p)θ(q a(s) t l(s)+1 ; p) k 1 l,n 1,n 2 Z 1 (1 p m T k u l q n1 t n2 ) c(km,l,n1,n2)