High-Energy Neutrinos Produced by Interactions of Relativistic Protons in Shocked Pulsar Winds

Similar documents
Pulsar Wind and pulsar wind nebulae

The Crab Nebula: 3-dimensional Modeling

Pulsar Winds. John Kirk. Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Heidelberg, Germany. < > p.1/18

Spatial Profile of the Emission from Pulsar Wind Nebulae with steady-state 1D Modeling

High Energy Emissions from the PSR /SS2883 Binary System

Radio Observations of TeV and GeV emitting Supernova Remnants

PHOTOSPHERIC THERMAL RADIATION FROM GRB COLLAPSAR JETS

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Feb 2003

Probing the Pulsar Wind in the TeV Binary System

On Cosmic-Ray Production Efficiency at Realistic Supernova Remnant Shocks

Fermi-Large Area Telescope Observations of Pulsar Wind Nebulae and their associated pulsars

Magnetic dissipation in pulsar winds

GAMMA-RAYS FROM MASSIVE BINARIES

Cosmic Accelerators. 2. Pulsars, Black Holes and Shock Waves. Roger Blandford KIPAC Stanford

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

Recent Observations of Supernova Remnants

UHECR from Pulsars/Magnetars based on An Auroral Accelerator Model for Gamma Ray Pulsars

The Crab Optical/X/gamma-ray polarisation processes

Supernova Remnants and Cosmic. Rays

Probing Pulsar Winds With X-rays!

High-Energy Plasma Astrophysics and Next Generation Gamma-Ray Observatory Cherenkov Telescope Array

The Secondary Universe

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays I

Pulsar Wind Nebulae as seen by Fermi-Large Area Telescope

Electrodynamics of Magnetized Rotators Anatoly Spitkovsky,, UC Berkeley

White dwarf pulsar as Possible Cosmic Ray Electron-Positron Factories

Pulsar Wind Nebulae. Pennsylvania State University. General outlook Chandra results Polarization in radio and optical X-ray polarization

Discovery of TeV Gamma-ray Emission Towards Supernova Remnant SNR G Last Updated Tuesday, 30 July :01

Sound Waves Sound Waves:

Composite Supernova Remnants: Multiwavelength Observations and Theoretical Modelling

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

This class: Life cycle of high mass stars Supernovae Neutron stars, pulsars, pulsar wind nebulae, magnetars Quark-nova stars Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)

Produced in nuclear processes (e.g. fusion reactions) Solar neutrinos and supernova neutrinos

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Sources of GeV Photons and the Fermi Results

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 30 May 2009

Cosmic Rays: A Way to Introduce Modern Physics Concepts. Steve Schnetzer

Cosmic Pevatrons in the Galaxy

A pulsar wind nebula associated with PSR J as the powering source of TeV J

Short Course on High Energy Astrophysics. Exploring the Nonthermal Universe with High Energy Gamma Rays

Shallow Decay of X-ray Afterglows in Short GRBs: Energy Injection from a Millisecond Magnetar?

Fermi: Highlights of GeV Gamma-ray Astronomy

Neutrino Astronomy. Ph 135 Scott Wilbur

Non-thermal emission from pulsars experimental status and prospects

PULSAR WIND NEBULAE AS COSMIC ACCELERATORS. Elena Amato INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri

Explosive reconnection of the double tearing mode in relativistic plasmas

A Detailed Study of. the Pulsar Wind Nebula 3C 58

Gravity Waves Gravity Waves

Lecture 3 Pulsars and pulsar wind nebulae

Spring 2007 Qualifier- Part I 7-minute Questions

High energy neutrino production in the core region of radio galaxies due to particle acceleration by magnetic reconnection

Constraints on cosmic-ray origin from gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants

X-ray Hotspot Flares and Implications for Cosmic Ray Acceleration and magnetic field amplification in Supernova Remnants

Neutrino Oscillations and Astroparticle Physics (5) John Carr Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille (IN2P3/CNRS) Pisa, 10 May 2002

Supernova Remnants and GLAST

THE TeV GAMMA-RAY MILKY WAY

Dr. John Kelley Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen

Diffusive shock acceleration: a first order Fermi process. jan.-fév NPAC, rayons cosmiques E. Parizot (APC)

ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS - High Energy Astronomy From the Ground - Felix Aharonian HIGH ENERGY ASTRONOMY FROM THE GROUND

Particle acceleration during the gamma-ray flares of the Crab Nebular

Numerical Simulations of the Jet in the Crab Nebula

High-energy neutrinos

High energy neutrinos from curvature pions in magnetars

Crab flares - explosive Reconnection Events in the Nebula

The Time Evolution of Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Core Collapse Supernovae An Emerging Picture Stephen W. Bruenn

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

Remnants and Pulsar Wind

Recent Results from VERITAS

EXCESS OF VHE COSMIC RAYS IN THE CENTRAL 100 PC OF THE MILKY WAY. Léa Jouvin, A. Lemière and R. Terrier

Kinetic modelling of pulsar magnetospheres

Understanding the pulsar magnetosphere through first-principle simulations

X-ray and multiwavelength observations of pulsarwind

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

1939 Baade&Zwicky 1949 Fermi 1977 (Krymski; Axford; Bell; Blandford & Ostriker

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

X-ray and Gamma-ray. Emission Pulsars and Pulsar Wind Nebulae. K.S. Cheng Department of Physics University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China

PIC modeling of particle acceleration and high-energy radiation in pulsars

Modeling of Pulsar Wind Nebulae

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

> News < AMS-02 will be launched onboard the Shuttle Endeavour On May 2nd 2:33 P.M. from NASA Kennedy space center!

Hard X-ray emission from Novae

Probing Pulsar Winds with Gamma Rays

Modeling of Pulsar Magnetospheres Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton) (with J. Arons, X. Bai, J. Li, L. Sironi, A. Tchekhovskoy)

Neutrinos, nonzero rest mass particles, and production of high energy photons Particle interactions

CTB 37A & CTB 37B - The fake twins SNRs

The role of ionization in the shock acceleration theory

An X-Ray Study of the Pulsar Wind Nebulae Discovered in the Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Band

Extended X- ray emission from PSR B /LS 2883 and other gamma- ray binaries

Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic γ-ray Sources

The new Siderius Nuncius: Astronomy without light

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 7 Jul 1999

Shock Waves. = 0 (momentum conservation)

The Physics of Fluids and Plasmas

Extended X-ray object ejected from the PSR B /LS 2883 binary

On the GCR/EGCR transition and UHECR origin

Pulsar Wind Nebulae: A Multiwavelength Perspective

Cosmic Rays - R. A. Mewaldt - California Institute of Technology

Supernova Remnants as Cosmic Ray Accelerants. By Jamie Overbeek Advised by Prof. J. Finley

Transcription:

High-Energy Neutrinos Produced by Interactions of Relativistic Protons in Shocked Pulsar Winds S. Nagataki Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Oiwake-cho Kitashirakawa Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan We have estimated fluxes of neutrinos and gamma-rays that are generated from decays of charged and neutral pions from a pulsar surrounded by supernova ejecta in our galaxy, including an effect that has not been taken into consideration, that is, interactions between high energy cosmic rays themselves in the nebula flow, assuming that hadronic components are the energetically dominant species in the pulsar wind. Bulk flow is assumed to be randomized by passing through the termination shock and energy distribution functions of protons and electrons behind the termination shock are assumed to obey the relativistic Maxwellians. We have found that fluxes of neutrinos and gamma-rays depend very sensitively on the wind luminosity, which is assumed to be comparable to the spin-down luminosity. In the case where B =10 12 Gand, neutrinos should be detected by km 3 high-energy neutrino detectors such as AMANDA and. Also, gamma-rays should be detected by Cherenkov telescopes such as and as well as by gamma-ray satellites such as. On the other hand, in the case where B =10 12 Gand, fluxes of neutrinos and gamma-rays will be too low to be detected even by the next-generation detectors. 1. Introduction It has been about 35 years since Goldreich and Julian (1969) pointed out that a rotating magnetic neutron star generates huge electric potential differences between different parts of its surface and, as a result, should be surrounded with charged plasma, which is called a magnetosphere. Gunn and Ostriker (1969) also pointed out the possibility that a rotating magnetic neutron star may be a source of high energy cosmic rays. Such high energy cosmic rays are considered to be driven along magnetic field lines since these lines do not cross. Also, since part of the magnetic fields around the neutron star passes through the light cylinder, which means such magnetic fields are open, accelerated charged particles are driven to outside of the light cylinder, which are called as pulsar winds. The pulsar winds are usually considered to be composed of electron-positron pairs since electron-positron pairs will be created so as to eliminate electric fields that are parallel to magnetic fields at a region where net charge density is not equal to the Goldreich-Julian density. However, it is also pointed out that hadronic component may exist in pulsar winds as a consequence of the net charge neutrality in the outflow. Moreover, it is pointed out that hadronic components may be the energetically dominant species although they are dominated by electron-positron pairs in number. This is because inertial masses of hadrons are much larger than that of electron. Based on the assumption that hadronic components are not negligible in pulsar winds, some scenarios are proposed to produce high energy neutrinos and gamma-rays from decays of charged and neutral pions that are produced by interactions between hadronic, accelerated high energy cosmic rays and surrounding photon fields and/or matter. Atoyan and Aharonian (1996) estimated flux of gamma-rays and discussed its contribution on the observed spectrum of the Crab nebula, although they concluded that its contribution may be important only at energies above 10 TeV. Bednarek and Protheroe (1997) proposed that accelerated heavy nuclei can be photo-disintegrated in the pulsar s outer gap, injecting energetic neutrons which decay into protons. The protons from neutron decay inside the supernova ejecta should accumulate, producing neutrinos and gamma-rays in collisions with the matter in the supernova ejecta. There are some papers based on this scenario and flux of neutrinos and/or gamma-rays is estimated. Beal and Bednarek (2002) proposed that accelerated cosmic rays will interact with the photon fields inside the supernova remnant at the very early phase (within 1 yr)ofasupernova explosion. Bednarek (2001) calculated the extragalactic neutrino background based on this scenario. In this study, we estimate fluxes of neutrinos and gamma-rays including an effect that has not been taken into consideration, that is, interactions between high energy cosmic rays themselves. This picture is based on the works given by Rees and Gunn (1974) and Kennel and Coroniti (1984). Rees and Gunn (1974) pointed out that the supersonic pulsar wind would terminate in a standing reverse shock located at a distance r s from the pulsar. Beyond the termination shock, the highly relativistic, supersonic flow is randomized and bulk speed becomes subsonic, obeying the Rankine-Hugoniot relations. According to Hoshino et al. (1992), who studied the theoretical properties of relativistic, transverse, magnetosonic collisionless shock waves in electron-positronheavy ion plasmas, proton distribution functions in the down stream are found to be almost exactly described by relativistic Maxwellians with temperatures 1

T p,2 /γ 1 m p c 2 0.34, where T p,2 is temperature at the down stream, γ 1 is the bulk Lorenz factor of protons in the up stream. It is noted that protons are not thermalized through the interactions with protons themselves, and/or electrons but just obeys the Maxwellian distribution through transferring cyclotron waves. This subsonic flow speed would be, by communicating with the nebula boundary at r N via sound waves, adjusted to match the expansion speed of the supernova remnant (that is, supernova ejecta) at the innermost region. This subsonic flow is called as nebula flow in the study of Kennel and Coroniti (1984). We also adopt this definition in this study. In this study, we calculate flux of neutrinos and gamma-rays from charged and neutral pion decays in the nebula flow which are produced through the interactions between high energy protons themselves, assuming that energy distribution functions of protons obey the relativistic Maxwellians. In this study, as the previous works, we assume that protons are energetically dominant in the pulsar winds. Thus, we describe the nebula flow using the proton mass as a unit of mass. We estimate pion production rates due to the interactions between high energy protons using proper Lorenz transformations. As for the cross sections between protons, scaling model is adopted. Isobar model is not included in this study since we consider production rates of high energy pions. Calculating the spectrum of neutrinos and gamma-rays in the termination shock rest frame, we estimate these fluxes at the earth assuming that the pulsar is located at 10 kpc away from the earth. 2. Method of Calculation 2.1. Nebular Flow As stated in section 1, we adopt the model presented by Kennel and Coroniti (1984), assuming that protons are energetically dominant. In their model, the pulsar sspindownluminosityl just ahead of the shock is divided between particle and magnetic luminosity as follows: L =4πnγr 2 sm p c 3 (1 + σ), (1) where n is the proper density of proton, u is the radial four speed of the flow, γ 2 =1+u 2, r s is the radial distance of the shock from the pulsar, m p is the proton mass, c is the speed of light, sigma is the ratio of the magnetic plus electric energy flux to the particle energy flux, B 2 σ = 4πnuγm p c 2, (2) and B is the observer frame magnetic field. The maximum energy of the protons just ahead of the shock is estimated by the potential difference between the equatorial plane and pole of the rotating neutron star. m p c 2 γ max =3 10 12 R 6 B 12 /P 2 ev, (3) where R 6 is the radius of the neutron star in 10 6 cm, B 12 is the amplitude of the magnetic field at pole of the neutron star, and P is the period of rotation of the pulsar in second. We adopt γ max for the bulk velocity of the pulsar wind in the upstream. The upstream flow is connected to the downstream via the Rankine-Hugoniot relations for perpendicular shock. As for the downstream flow, the steady state equation of motion is adopted. Position of the termination shock is determined so as to achieve the pressure balance between the supernova remnant and downstream of the pulsar wind at the inner-edge of the supernova remnant. We estimate the pressure in the supernova remnant by assuming that the ratio of the thermal energy relative to the kinetic energy is about 0.02 in the supernova remnant. Total explosion energy of a supernova is taken to be 10 51 erg. The velocity of the inner-edge of the supernova remnant is set to be 2000 km s 1. As for the distribution of the protons in the downstream, the Maxwellian with the temperature that gives the required pressure at each position is adopted. 2.2. Emissivity of High Energy Gamma-rays and Neutrinos Next, we calculate the emissivity of high-energy gamma-rays and neutrinos using the formulation as follows: 1 1 F (E π )=2πc γ R 2 dr 1 dγ 1 d cos θ dσ(γ 1,γ 2, cos θ) n(r, γ 1 )n(r, γ 2 ) de π ( β 1 β 2 ) 2 ( β 1 β 2 ) 2, (4) where γ 1, γ 2 are the respective Lorenz factors of the two protons, cos θ = β 1 β 2 / β 1 β2, R is the radius with respect to the neutron star, n(r, γ) is the differential number density of protons at position R, and dσ(γ 1,γ 2, cos θ)/de π is the differential cross section of proton-proton interaction. The energy spectrum of gamma-rays produced through the decays of neutral pions in the fluid-rest frame is obtained as F (E π ) F (E γ )=2 de π, (5) E π,min E 2 π m 2 π where E π min is the minimum pion energy required to produce a gamma-ray with energy E γ. In the observer s frame, the energy spectrum of photons are γ γ 2 2

10 5 10 7 Age = 1yr 10 5 10 7 Age = 10 2 yr 10 9 10 9 Figure 1: Spectrum of energy fluxes of neutrinos from a pulsar which is located 10 kpc away from the earth. The amplitude of the magnetic field and period of the pulsar is assumed to be 10 12 G and 1ms. The minimum detectable energy flux of, AMANDA II (1yr), and is represented by horizontal lines. The atmospheric neutrino energy fluxes for a circular patch of 1 are also shown. The age of the pulsar is set to be 1yr. expressed as F (E γ ) dω = V F (E γ ) 1 Γ 2 (1 β cos θ ) 4π, (6) where Γ is the bulk Lorenz factor of the fluid element at each position in the observer s frame, θ is the angle between the line of sight and direction of the flow, and V is the volume of the each fluid element. The dashes( ) represent the quantum for the observer s frame. The flux of neutrinos and pions can be obtained as a result of pion decays. although µ ± e ± + ν e ( ν e )+ ν µ (ν µ ) is a 3-body process and slightly complicated. As for the differential cross section of pion production, we adopted the formulation presented by Badhwar et al. (1977). 3. Results In figures 1 and 2, we show spectrum of energy fluxes of neutrinos from a pulsar which is located 10kpc away from the earth. The amplitude of the magnetic field and period of the pulsar is assumed to be 10 12 G and 1ms. The detection limits of the energy flux for,, and are represented by horizontal lines. The atmospheric neutrino energy fluxes for a circular patch of 1 are also shown. Figure 1 represents the case that the age of the pulsar is 1yr, while Figure 2 represents the case that the age is 10 2 yr. From this figure, we can find that there is a possibility to detect the signals of neutrinos from pulsar winds in our galaxy. Figure 2: Same with Fig.1, but the age of the pulsar is set to be 10 2 yr. Age = 10 1 yr Figure 3: Same with Fig.1, but the age of the period of the pulsar is set to be 5ms. For comparison, in figures 3 and 4, we show the spectrum of energy fluxes of neutrinos from a pulsar of which the amplitude of the magnetic field and period are assumed to be 10 12 G and 5ms. Location of the pulsar is assumed to be 10 kpc away from the earth. Figure 3 represents the case that the age of the pulsar is 10yr, while Figure 4 represents the case that the age is 10 3 yr. In these cases, the fluxes of neutrinos are much lower than the atmospheric neutrinos and detection limits of km 3 high-energy neutrino detectors. We can conclude that the detectability of the signals from the pulsar winds strongly depends on the period of the pulsar, which reflects the luminosity of the pulsar winds. In figures 5 and 6, integrated gamma-ray fluxes from the neutral pion decays are shown assuming that the supernova ejecta has been optically thin for gammarays. The amplitude of the magnetic field and period of the pulsar are assumed to be 10 12 G and 1ms. Figure 3 represents the case that the age of the pulsar is 1yr, while Figure 4 shows the case that the age of the 3

Age = 10 2 yr Figure 4: Same with Fig.2, but the age of the period of the pulsar is set to be 5ms. Figure 6: Same with Fig.5, but the age of the pulsar is set to be 10 2 yr. Age = 1yr Figure 5: Integrated gamma-ray fluxes from the neutral pion decays are shown. The amplitude of the magnetic field and period of the pulsar are assumed to be 10 12 G and 1ms. The age of the pulsar is set to be 1yr. The minimum detectable integrated fluxes of, STACEE, CELESTE,,,,, and are also shown. pulsar is 10 2 yr. The detection limits of integrated fluxes for, STACEE, CELESTE,,,,, and are also shown. From these figures, we can find that there is a possibility to detect gamma-rays from decays of neutral pions by these telescopes. On the other hand, we show the same figures in figures 7 and 8, but for the case that the period of the pulsar is 5ms. Figure 7 represents the case that the age of the pulsar is 10yr, while Figure 8 shows the case that the age of the pulsar is 10 3 yr. In these cases, the flux of gamma-rays is too low to detect. Figure 7: Same with Fig.5, but the period of the pulsar is set to be 5ms and the age of the pulsar is set to be 10yr. 4. Summary and Conclusion In this study, we have estimated fluxes of neutrinos and gamma-rays that are generated from decays of charged and neutral pions from a pulsar surrounded by supernova ejecta in our galaxy, including an effect that has not been taken into consideration, that is, interactions between high energy cosmic rays themselves in the nebula flow, assuming that hadronic components be the energetically dominant species in the pulsar wind. Bulk flow is assumed to be randomized by passing through the termination shock and energy distribution functions of protons and electrons behind the termination shock obey the relativistic Maxwellians. We have found that fluxes of neutrinos and gammarays depend very sensitively on the wind luminosity, which is assumed to be comparable with the spindown luminosity. In the case where and, neutrinos should be detected by km 3 high-energy neutrino detectors such as AMANDA 4

Acknowledgments The author thanks K. Sato, M. Hoshino, S. Shibata, S. Yamada, S. Yoshida, T. Naito, and K. Kohri for useful comments. The author is also pleased to acknowledge useful comments by the anonymous referee of this manuscript. This work is supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for scientific research provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan through Research Grant No.S 14102004 and No. 14079202. Figure 8: Same with Fig.7, but the age of the pulsar is set to be 10 3 yr. and. Also, gamma-rays should be detected by Cherenkov telescopes such as and as well as by gamma-ray satellites such as. On the other hand, in the case where B = 10 12 Gand, fluxes of neutrinos will be too low to be detected even by the next-generation detectors. We have found that interactions between high energy cosmic rays themselves are so effective that this effect can be confirmed by future observations. Thus, we conclude that it is worth while investigating this effect further in the near future. References [1] Atoyan, A. M., Aharonian, F. A., 1996, MNRAS, 278, 525, (1996) [2] Beall, J. H., Bednarek, W., 2002, ApJ, 569, 343 [3] Bednarek, W., Prhotheroe, R. J., 1997, PRL, 79, 2616 [4] Bednarek, W., 2001, A&A, 378, 49 [5] Goldreich, P., Julian, W. H., 1969, ApJ, 157, 869 [6] Gunn, J. E., Ostriker, J. P., 1969, PRL, 22, 728 [7] Hoshino, M., Arons, J., Gallant, Y. A., Langdon, A. B., 1992, ApJ, 390, 454 [8] Kennel C. F., Coroniti, F. V., 1984, ApJ, 283, 694 [9] Nagataki, S., 2004, ApJ, 600, 883 [10] Rees, M. J., Gunn, J. E., 1974, MNRAS, 167, 1 5