The Langlands Program: Beyond Endoscopy

Similar documents
ON SMOOTHING SINGULARITIES OF ELLIPTIC ORBITAL INTEGRALS ON GL(n) AND BEYOND ENDOSCOPY

On the Langlands Program

GONZÁLEZ, CHUNG HANG KWAN, STEVEN J. MILLER, ROGER VAN PESKI, AND TIAN AN WONG

I. An overview of the theory of Zeta functions and L-series. K. Consani Johns Hopkins University

Introduction to L-functions I: Tate s Thesis

Why is the Riemann Hypothesis Important?

Analytic number theory for probabilists

Are ζ-functions able to solve Diophantine equations?

Artin L-functions. Charlotte Euvrard. January 10, Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Besançon

Distributions of Primes in Number Fields and the L-function Ratios Conjecture

TOPICS IN NUMBER THEORY - EXERCISE SHEET I. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

Dirichlet s Theorem. Martin Orr. August 21, The aim of this article is to prove Dirichlet s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions:

L-functions and Automorphic Representations

Analytic Number Theory

ON THE RESIDUAL SPECTRUM OF SPLIT CLASSICAL GROUPS SUPPORTED IN THE SIEGEL MAXIMAL PARABOLIC SUBGROUP

A brief overview of modular and automorphic forms

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

TITLES & ABSTRACTS OF TALKS

Dedekind zeta function and BDS conjecture

DETERMINATION OF GL(3) CUSP FORMS BY CENTRAL VALUES OF GL(3) GL(2) L-FUNCTIONS, LEVEL ASPECT

COUNTING MOD l SOLUTIONS VIA MODULAR FORMS

A (very brief) History of the Trace Formula. James Arthur

Alan Turing and the Riemann hypothesis. Andrew Booker

18 The analytic class number formula

Automorphic forms, L-functions and number theory (March 12 16) Three Introductory lectures. E. Kowalski

What is... an L-function?

Uniform Distribution of Zeros of Dirichlet Series

On the equality case of the Ramanujan Conjecture for Hilbert modular forms

Hecke Theory and Jacquet Langlands

The zeta function, L-functions, and irreducible polynomials

CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS CARL ERICKSON

Uniform Distribution of Zeros of Dirichlet Series

Results from MathSciNet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web c Copyright American Mathematical Society 1998

What is a motive? David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris. September 10, 2015

Zeta functions of buildings and Shimura varieties

Converse theorems for modular L-functions

RIMS. Ibukiyama Zhuravlev. B.Heim

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

ON THE LIFTING OF HERMITIAN MODULAR. Notation

LECTURE 1: LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCES FOR GL n. We begin with variations on the theme of Converse Theorems. This is a coda to SF s lectures.

On the generation of the coefficient field of a newform by a single Hecke eigenvalue

On the low-lying zeros of elliptic curve L-functions

RIEMANN S ZETA FUNCTION AND BEYOND

Calculation and arithmetic significance of modular forms

Newman s Conjecture for function field L-functions

EFFECTIVE MOMENTS OF DIRICHLET L-FUNCTIONS IN GALOIS ORBITS

x s 1 e x dx, for σ > 1. If we replace x by nx in the integral then we obtain x s 1 e nx dx. x s 1

Lecture Notes: Tate s thesis

Dirichlet s Theorem. Calvin Lin Zhiwei. August 18, 2007

Gauss and Riemann versus elementary mathematics

Title Project Summary

Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society

Periods and congruences of various lifts

Twists and residual modular Galois representations

Using approximate functional equations to build L functions

Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory L(s, χ) as an entire function; Gauss sums

Part II. Number Theory. Year

Titchmarsh divisor problem for abelian varieties of type I, II, III, and IV

15 Elliptic curves and Fermat s last theorem

The Riemann Hypothesis Project summary

A NOTE ON REAL ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFER AND PSEUDO-COEFFICIENTS

Tate s thesis and arithmetic zeta functions

Class groups and Galois representations

Representations Are Everywhere

Holomorphy of the 9th Symmetric Power L-Functions for Re(s) >1. Henry H. Kim and Freydoon Shahidi

A p-adic GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 1

arxiv: v3 [math.nt] 15 Nov 2017

TRILINEAR FORMS AND TRIPLE PRODUCT EPSILON FACTORS WEE TECK GAN

The Prime Number Theorem

Artin Conjecture for p-adic Galois Representations of Function Fields

L-FUNCTIONS AND THE RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS. 1 n s

STABILITY AND ENDOSCOPY: INFORMAL MOTIVATION. James Arthur University of Toronto

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

The Riemann Hypothesis

Continuing the pre/review of the simple (!?) case...

Report on the Trace Formula

Automorphic Galois representations and Langlands correspondences

KUMMER S CRITERION ON CLASS NUMBERS OF CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS

A NOTE ON THE SHIMURA CORRESPONDENCE AND THE RAMANUJAN τ(n) FUNCTION

Notes on the Riemann Zeta Function

FINITE GROUPS AND EQUATIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS A PROBLEM SET FOR ARIZONA WINTER SCHOOL 2016

Zeros of Dirichlet L-Functions over the Rational Function Field

LECTURE 1. ZETA FUNCTIONS: AN OVERVIEW

Kleine AG: Travaux de Shimura

14 From modular forms to automorphic representations

Functoriality and the trace formula

Elliptic Curves Spring 2019 Problem Set #7 Due: 04/08/2019

The Endoscopic Classification of Representations

9 Artin representations

Modular forms and the Hilbert class field

Introduction to L-functions II: of Automorphic L-functions.

Before giving the detailed proof, we outline our strategy. Define the functions. for Re s > 1.

Lemma 1.1. The field K embeds as a subfield of Q(ζ D ).

1, for s = σ + it where σ, t R and σ > 1

Don Zagier s work on singular moduli

ARCHIMEDEAN ASPECTS OF SIEGEL MODULAR FORMS OF DEGREE 2

SERRE S CONJECTURE AND BASE CHANGE FOR GL(2)

COMPUTATIONAL NUMBER THEORY IN RELATION WITH L-FUNCTIONS

A proof of Selberg s orthogonality for automorphic L-functions

Transcription:

The Langlands Program: Beyond Endoscopy Oscar E. González 1, oscar.gonzalez3@upr.edu Kevin Kwan 2, kevinkwanch@gmail.com 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras. 2 Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. Young Mathematicians Conference The Ohio State University August 21, 2016

What is the Langlands program? Conjectures relating many areas of math. Proposed by Robert P. Langlands about 50 years ago.

Automorphic Forms A modular form of weight k is a complex-valued function f on the upper half-plane H = {z C, Im(z) > 0} (z = a + bi with b > 0), satisfying the following three conditions:

Automorphic Forms A modular form of weight k is a complex-valued function f on the upper half-plane H = {z C, Im(z) > 0} (z = a + bi with b > 0), satisfying the following three conditions: 1 For any z in H and any matrix ( ) a b in SL2 (Z), f satisfies the equation f ( az+b cz+d ) c d = (cz + d) k f (z). 2 f is a holomorphic (complex analytic) function on H. 3 f satisfies certain growth conditions at the cusps.

Automorphic Forms A modular form of weight k is a complex-valued function f on the upper half-plane H = {z C, Im(z) > 0} (z = a + bi with b > 0), satisfying the following three conditions: 1 For any z in H and any matrix ( ) a b in SL2 (Z), f satisfies the equation f ( az+b cz+d ) c d = (cz + d) k f (z). 2 f is a holomorphic (complex analytic) function on H. 3 f satisfies certain growth conditions at the cusps. Automorphic forms generalize modular forms.

Langlands Functoriality Conjecture Conjecture 1.1 Given two reductive groups H, G with a homomorphism L H L G, there exists a related transfer of automorphic forms on H to automorphic forms on G Π(H) Π(G).

What are L-functions? Diverse families of functions attached to arithmetic objects, for example: Riemann zeta function ζ(s) = n=1 1 n s for Rs > 1, useful in studying distribution of primes. Dirichlet L-function L(s, χ) = n=1 χ(n) n s for Rs > 1, where χ is a Dirichlet s character, i.e. homomorphism χ : (Z/NZ) S 1. Useful in studying distribution of primes in arithmetic progression.

What are L-functions? Dedekind zeta function: associated to a number field E, i.e., finite degree field extension of Q.

What are L-functions? Dedekind zeta function: associated to a number field E, i.e., finite degree field extension of Q. ζ E (s) = a 1 N E/Q (a) s, for Rs > 1, where the sum is over all non-zero integral ideals of E.

Artin L-function: associated to a Galois representation.

Artin L-function: associated to a Galois representation. Definition 2.1 Let E be a number field. Let ρ : Gal(E/Q) GL(d, C) be a finite dimensional Galois representation. The Artin L-function associated to ρ is given in terms of the Euler product: L(s, ρ) = p det(i ρ(fr p )p s ) 1, where Fr p is the Frobenius element in Gal(E/Q). Denote by σ E the Artin representation obtained from the factorization ζ E (s) = ζ Q (s)l(s, σ E ), where ζ Q is the Riemann zeta function.

Essential Properties of L-functions Series expansion for Rs > 1.

Essential Properties of L-functions Series expansion for Rs > 1. Euler product for Rs > 1: ζ(s) = p L(s, χ) = p ζ E (s) = p (1 p s ) 1, (1 χ(p)p s ) 1, 1 1 N E/Q (p) s.

Essential Properties of L-functions Can be completed by gamma factors. The completed L-functions are meromorphic on C with at most poles at s = 0 and s = 1 and they satisfy functional equations.

Functional Equations of ζ(s) Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2).

Functional Equations of ζ(s) Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2). Completion: Λ(s) = γ(s)ζ(s).

Functional Equations of ζ(s) Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2). Completion: Λ(s) = γ(s)ζ(s). Functional equation: Λ(s) = Λ(1 s).

Functional Equations of ζ(s) Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2). Completion: Λ(s) = γ(s)ζ(s). Functional equation: Λ(s) = Λ(1 s). Λ(s) is analytic on C except with a simple pole at s = 1. Also, Res s=1 ζ(s) = 1. Riemann Hypothesis: all non-trivial zeros lie on the critical line Re(s) = 1 2. Such a result would provide results on the distribution of prime numbers.

Functional Equation of L(s, χ) For a primitive character χ (i.e., not induced by any character of smaller modulus), we have the following. Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ((s + δ)/2), where δ = 0 if χ( 1) = 1 and δ = 1 if χ( 1) = 1.

Functional Equation of L(s, χ) For a primitive character χ (i.e., not induced by any character of smaller modulus), we have the following. Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ((s + δ)/2), where δ = 0 if χ( 1) = 1 and δ = 1 if χ( 1) = 1. Completion Λ(s) = q s/2 γ(s)l(s, χ), where q is the modulus of χ.

Functional Equation of L(s, χ) For a primitive character χ (i.e., not induced by any character of smaller modulus), we have the following. Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ((s + δ)/2), where δ = 0 if χ( 1) = 1 and δ = 1 if χ( 1) = 1. Completion Λ(s) = q s/2 γ(s)l(s, χ), where q is the modulus of χ. Functional equation Λ(s, χ) = τ(χ) q Λ(1 s, χ).

Functional Equation of L(s, χ) For a primitive character χ (i.e., not induced by any character of smaller modulus), we have the following. Gamma factor: γ(s) = π s/2 Γ((s + δ)/2), where δ = 0 if χ( 1) = 1 and δ = 1 if χ( 1) = 1. Completion Λ(s) = q s/2 γ(s)l(s, χ), where q is the modulus of χ. Functional equation Λ(s, χ) = τ(χ) q Λ(1 s, χ). L(s, χ) is entire if χ χ 0. If χ = χ 0, then L(s, χ) is analytic on C except having a simple pole at s = 1.

Functional equation of ζ E (s) (Hecke) Gamma factor: γ(s) = Γ R (s) r 1 Γ C (s) 2r 2, where Γ R (s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2), Γ C (s) = 2(2π) s Γ(s), r 1 and 2r 2 are the number of real and complex places of the number field E.

Functional equation of ζ E (s) (Hecke) Gamma factor: γ(s) = Γ R (s) r 1 Γ C (s) 2r 2, where Γ R (s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2), Γ C (s) = 2(2π) s Γ(s), r 1 and 2r 2 are the number of real and complex places of the number field E. Completion: Λ E (s) = D E s/2 γ(s)ζ E (s), where D E is the discriminant of the number field E.

Functional equation of ζ E (s) (Hecke) Gamma factor: γ(s) = Γ R (s) r 1 Γ C (s) 2r 2, where Γ R (s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2), Γ C (s) = 2(2π) s Γ(s), r 1 and 2r 2 are the number of real and complex places of the number field E. Completion: Λ E (s) = D E s/2 γ(s)ζ E (s), where D E is the discriminant of the number field E. Functional equation Λ E (s) = Λ E (1 s).

Functional equation of ζ E (s) (Hecke) Gamma factor: γ(s) = Γ R (s) r 1 Γ C (s) 2r 2, where Γ R (s) = π s/2 Γ(s/2), Γ C (s) = 2(2π) s Γ(s), r 1 and 2r 2 are the number of real and complex places of the number field E. Completion: Λ E (s) = D E s/2 γ(s)ζ E (s), where D E is the discriminant of the number field E. Functional equation Λ E (s) = Λ E (1 s). ζ(e) is analytic on C except with a simple pole at s = 1.

Res s=1 ζ E (s) is very interesting and it connects many fundamental quantities of algebraic number theory.

Res s=1 ζ E (s) is very interesting and it connects many fundamental quantities of algebraic number theory. r 1 is the number of real places of E, 2r 2 is the number of complex places of E (r 1 + 2r 2 = n), h E is the class number of E, R E is the regulator of E, w E is the number of roots of unity in E Theorem 2.2 (Class Number Formula) Res s=1 ζ E (s) = 2r 1 (2π) r 2 h E R E w E DE.

Arthur-Selberg Trace Formula Definition 2.3 (Right Regular Representation of G) The right regular representation of group G on L 2 (Γ \ G), denoted by R, is defined by R(y)φ(x) = φ(xy), where x, y G, φ L 2 (Γ \ G). Definition 2.4 (Right Regular Operator) Let f C c (G). We define the right regular operator R(f ) on L 2 (Γ \ G) as follows: for φ L 2 (Γ \ G), we have R(f )φ(x) = f (x)r(y)φ(x)dy = f (y)φ(xy)dy. G G

Let Q p denote the p-adic field (p being a prime), Q := R. Together they give all of the completions of Q.

Let Q p denote the p-adic field (p being a prime), Q := R. Together they give all of the completions of Q. The ring of adeles is the restricted direct product of all Q p, where p. We denote the ring of adeles by A.

Let Q p denote the p-adic field (p being a prime), Q := R. Together they give all of the completions of Q. The ring of adeles is the restricted direct product of all Q p, where p. We denote the ring of adeles by A. In this way A is locally compact and we can assign a Haar measure on G(A), where G = GL(n).

Arthur-Selberg Trace Formula γ G(Q) is said to be elliptic if its characteristic polynomial is irreducible over Q.

Arthur-Selberg Trace Formula γ G(Q) is said to be elliptic if its characteristic polynomial is irreducible over Q. Denote by G γ the centralizer of γ in G. Theorem 2.5 (Elliptic Part of Arthur-Selberg Trace Tormula) tr R(f ) = meas(γ) γ ell = γ ell meas(γ) v G γ(a)\g(a) G γ(q v )\G(Q v ) f (g 1 γg)dg + f v (g 1 γg)dg v. +

Idea of Beyond Endoscopy and L-functions Given an automorphic form π on G and a representation r of L G, one can define an automorphic L-function L(s, π, r) = n=1 a π,r (n) n s.

Idea of Beyond Endoscopy and L-functions Given an automorphic form π on G and a representation r of L G, one can define an automorphic L-function L(s, π, r) = n=1 a π,r (n) n s. Let G, G be reductive groups. If an automorphic form π on G is a functorial transfer from a smaller G, then one expects the L-function L(s, π, r) to have a pole at s = 1 for some representation r of L G.

Idea of Beyond Endoscopy and L-functions Given an automorphic form π on G and a representation r of L G, one can define an automorphic L-function L(s, π, r) = n=1 a π,r (n) n s. Let G, G be reductive groups. If an automorphic form π on G is a functorial transfer from a smaller G, then one expects the L-function L(s, π, r) to have a pole at s = 1 for some representation r of L G. In particular, the order of pole of L(s, π, r) at s = 1, which we denote by m r (π), should be nonzero if and only if π is a transfer.

Idea of Beyond Endoscopy and L-functions Langlands idea is to weight the spectral terms in the stable trace formula by m r (π), resulting in a trace formula whose spectral side detects only π for which the m r (π) is nonzero.

Idea of Beyond Endoscopy and L-functions Langlands idea is to weight the spectral terms in the stable trace formula by m r (π), resulting in a trace formula whose spectral side detects only π for which the m r (π) is nonzero. Since in general L(s, π, r) is not a priori defined at s = 1, we account for the weight factor by taking the residue at s = 1 of the logarithmic derivative of L(s, π, r).

Outline of Altuğ s work Apply Poisson summation to the elliptic part of the trace formula.

Outline of Altuğ s work Apply Poisson summation to the elliptic part of the trace formula. This isolates the contribution from trivial representation, which should give us the major contribution.

Outline of Altuğ s work Apply Poisson summation to the elliptic part of the trace formula. This isolates the contribution from trivial representation, which should give us the major contribution. Give other versions of trace formula to be used in detecting the functorial transfer.

Our goal: Carry out the analysis of Altuğ to GL(n).

Our goal: Carry out the analysis of Altuğ to GL(n). Obstacle: We cannot directly apply Poisson summation formula!

Our goal: Carry out the analysis of Altuğ to GL(n). Obstacle: We cannot directly apply Poisson summation formula! There are singularities from the real orbital integrals.

Our Work By using the Class Number Formula, we have meas(γ) = meas(z + G γ (Q)\G γ (A)) = meas(e \I 1 E ) = 2r 1 (2π) r 2 h E R E w E = D E L(1, σ E ).

Using the CNF, we can write the elliptic part of the trace formula as follows: ±p k tr(γ),...,tr(γ n 1 ) 1 s γ L(1, σ E ) D γ 1/2 Orb(f ; γ) q Orb(f q ; γ).

Approximate functional equation of Artin L-function Assuming Artin s conjecture, we can write the approximate functional equation of L(1, σ E ).

L(s, ρ) = n π d(s+u)n/2 Γ( s+u 2 λ ρ (n) 1 n s 2πi (3) d π Γ( d(s)n/2 s 2) + +2dr 2Γ ( s+1 2 ) d π Γ( + d(1 s)n/2 +2dr 1 s 2Γ ( 2 s 2 2 ( ) n u X G(u) q ) d + +2dr 2Γ ( ) d +2dr s+u+1 2 2 du ) d +2dr 2 u + ɛ(ρ)q 1 2 s ) d +2dr 2 ) d +2dr 2 d π Γ( d(s)n/2 s 2) + +2dr 2Γ ( s+1 n 2 ) d π Γ( + d(1 s+u)n/2 +2dr 1 s+u 2Γ ( 2 s+u G(u) 2 π d(1 s)n/2 Γ( 1 s 2 ) d + +2dr 2Γ ( 2 s 2 ( ) λ ρ (n) 1 nx u q n 1 s 2πi (3) ) d +2dr 2 2 du ) d +2dr 2 u.

Our work Recall our form of the elliptic part of the trace formula ±p k tr(γ),...,tr(γ n 1 ) 1 s γ L(1, σ E ) D γ 1/2 Orb(f ; γ) q Orb(f q ; γ). By applying the AFE and using some results of Shelstad on real orbital integrals [Shelstad 1979], we get Theorem 1 Assume Artin s conjecture. Then L(1, σ E ) D γ 1/2 Orb(f ; γ) is smooth. This result is unconditional for n = 2, 3.

What we d like to do Work with a general reductive group instead of GL(n). Study the product of p-adic orbital integrals. Apply Poisson summation to the resulting smooth expression.

Thanks The Ohio State University Rodica Costin, Craig Jackson, Bart Snapp Williams College NSF grants DMS1347804, DMS1561945 and DMS1265673 The Chinese University of Hong Kong Steven J. Miller and Tian An Wong Roger Van Peski

References S. A. Altuğ, Beyond Endoscopy via the Trace Formula - I: Poisson Summation and Contributions of Special Representations. Composito Mathematica 151 (2015), 1791-1820. O. E. González, C. H. Kwan, S. J. Miller, R. Van Peski and T. A. Wong, On smoothing singularities of elliptic orbital integrals on GL(n) and Beyond Endoscopy. Available at http://web.williams.edu/mathematics/sjmiller/ public_html/math/papers/beyondendosmall21.pdf. H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski, Analytic number theory, AMS Colloquium Publications, vol. 53, 2004.

References R. P. Langlands, Beyond Endoscopy, in Contributions to automorphic forms, geometry and number theory, pp. 611-697, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 2004. B. C. Ngô, Le lemme fondamental pour les algèbres de Lie. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 111 (2010), 1-169. D. Shelstad, Orbital integrals for GL 2 (R), in Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions, pp. 107-110, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33 part I, American Mathematical Society, Corvallis, OR, 1979.