FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES

Similar documents
C.6 Adjoints for Operators on Hilbert Spaces

Chapter 8 Integral Operators

4 Linear operators and linear functionals

I teach myself... Hilbert spaces

Analysis Preliminary Exam Workshop: Hilbert Spaces

Elementary linear algebra

Your first day at work MATH 806 (Fall 2015)

Spectral Theory, with an Introduction to Operator Means. William L. Green

SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS

CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: WEAK AND WEAK* CONVERGENCE

Orthonormal Bases Fall Consider an inner product space V with inner product f, g and norm

Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels

A Brief Introduction to Functional Analysis

OPERATOR THEORY ON HILBERT SPACE. Class notes. John Petrovic

08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms

Fall TMA4145 Linear Methods. Solutions to exercise set 9. 1 Let X be a Hilbert space and T a bounded linear operator on X.

Numerical Linear Algebra

1. General Vector Spaces

A brief introduction to trace class operators

Finite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product

Review of linear algebra

Functional Analysis Review

Linear Algebra. Min Yan

1 Functional Analysis

Math Linear Algebra II. 1. Inner Products and Norms

Functional Analysis II held by Prof. Dr. Moritz Weber in summer 18

Exercise Sheet 1.

Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices

1 The Projection Theorem

Functional Analysis. Martin Brokate. 1 Normed Spaces 2. 2 Hilbert Spaces The Principle of Uniform Boundedness 32

Hilbert Spaces. Contents

LINEAR PRESERVER PROBLEMS: generalized inverse

j=1 [We will show that the triangle inequality holds for each p-norm in Chapter 3 Section 6.] The 1-norm is A F = tr(a H A).

Chapter 1. Introduction

1. Foundations of Numerics from Advanced Mathematics. Linear Algebra


SOME INEQUALITIES FOR THE EUCLIDEAN OPERATOR RADIUS OF TWO OPERATORS IN HILBERT SPACES

Lecture # 3 Orthogonal Matrices and Matrix Norms. We repeat the definition an orthogonal set and orthornormal set.

Chapter 4 Euclid Space

COMPACT OPERATORS. 1. Definitions

October 25, 2013 INNER PRODUCT SPACES

Infinite-dimensional Vector Spaces and Sequences

CONTENTS. 4 Hausdorff Measure Introduction The Cantor Set Rectifiable Curves Cantor Set-Like Objects...

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES. 1. Compact Sets

Basics of Hermitian Geometry

Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference Lecture 22: Preliminaries for Semiparametric Inference

Elements of Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space

Linear Algebra Lecture Notes-II

4.6. Linear Operators on Hilbert Spaces

Mathematical Methods wk 1: Vectors

Mathematical Methods wk 1: Vectors

Lecture 5. Ch. 5, Norms for vectors and matrices. Norms for vectors and matrices Why?

Hilbert space methods for quantum mechanics. S. Richard

Lecture 6 & 7. Shuanglin Shao. September 16th and 18th, 2013

Lecture Notes on Operator Algebras. John M. Erdman Portland State University. Version March 12, 2011

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Math 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces. In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces.

Functional Analysis Exercise Class

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

LECTURE 7. k=1 (, v k)u k. Moreover r

NOTES ON FRAMES. Damir Bakić University of Zagreb. June 6, 2017

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

Chapter 5. Basics of Euclidean Geometry

Fall TMA4145 Linear Methods. Exercise set Given the matrix 1 2

The Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator

Part 1a: Inner product, Orthogonality, Vector/Matrix norm

Solutions to Exam I MATH 304, section 6

MATH 220: INNER PRODUCT SPACES, SYMMETRIC OPERATORS, ORTHOGONALITY

Functional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...

Intertibility and spectrum of the multiplication operator on the space of square-summable sequences

Inequalities in Hilbert Spaces

ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.

is an isomorphism, and V = U W. Proof. Let u 1,..., u m be a basis of U, and add linearly independent

Categories and Quantum Informatics: Hilbert spaces

About Grupo the Mathematical de Investigación Foundation of Quantum Mechanics

ADJOINTS, ABSOLUTE VALUES AND POLAR DECOMPOSITIONS

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces

A PRIMER ON SESQUILINEAR FORMS

Functional Analysis. AMAT 617 University of Calgary Winter semester Lecturer: Gilad Gour Notes taken by Mark Girard.

Fourier and Wavelet Signal Processing

10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz

CHAPTER II HILBERT SPACES

HILBERT SPACES AND THE RADON-NIKODYM THEOREM. where the bar in the first equation denotes complex conjugation. In either case, for any x V define

Recall that any inner product space V has an associated norm defined by

Some Results in Generalized n-inner Product Spaces

Numerical Range in C*-Algebras

Linear algebra and applications to graphs Part 1

Bernstein-Szegö Inequalities in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Algebra I Fall 2007

j=1 u 1jv 1j. 1/ 2 Lemma 1. An orthogonal set of vectors must be linearly independent.

EECS 598: Statistical Learning Theory, Winter 2014 Topic 11. Kernels

Definitions for Quizzes

4 Hilbert spaces. The proof of the Hilbert basis theorem is not mathematics, it is theology. Camille Jordan

Throughout these notes we assume V, W are finite dimensional inner product spaces over C.

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS: NOTES AND PROBLEMS

5. Orthogonal matrices

HOMEWORK FOR , FALL 2007 ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTIONS. T = sup T(x) Ax A := sup

The spectrum of a self-adjoint operator is a compact subset of R

TOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :

Transcription:

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Adjoints in Hilbert Spaces Recall that the dot product on R n is given by x y = x T y, while the dot product on C n is x y = x T ȳ. Example 1.1. Let A be an m n real matrix. Then x Ax defines a linear map of R n into R m, and its transpose A T satisfies x R n, y R m, Ax y = (Ax) T y = x T A T y = x (A T y). Similarly, if A is an m n complex matrix, then its Hermitian or adjoint matrix A H = A T satisfies x C n, y C m, Ax y = (Ax) T ȳ = x T A T ȳ = x (A H y). Theorem 1.2 (Adjoint). Let H and K be Hilbert spaces, and let A: H K be a bounded, linear map. Then there exists a unique bounded linear map A : K H such that x H, y K, Ax, y = x, A y. Proof. Fix y K. Then Lx = Ax, y is a bounded linear functional on H. By the Riesz Representation Theorem, there exists a unique vector h H such that Ax, y = Lx = x, h. Define A y = h. Verify that this map A is linear (exercise). To see that it is bounded, observe that A y = h = sup x, h x =1 = sup Ax, y x =1 sup Ax y x =1 sup A x y = A y. x =1 These notes closely follow and expand on the text by John B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, Second Edition, Springer, 1990. c 2007 by Christopher Heil. 1

2 ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES We conclude that A is bounded, and that A A. Finally, we must show that A is unique. Suppose that B B(K, H) also satisfied Ax, y = x, By for all x H and y K. Then for each fixed y we would have that x, By A y = 0 for every x, which implies By A y = 0. Hence B = A. Exercise 1.3 (Properties of the adjoint). (a) If A B(H, K) then (A ) = A. (b) If A, B B(H, K) and α, β F, then (αa + βb) = ᾱa + βb. (c) If A B(H 1, H 2 ) and B B(H 2, H 3 ), then (BA) = A B. (d) If A B(H) is invertible in B(H) (meaning that there exists A 1 B(H) such that AA 1 = A 1 A = I), then A is invertible in B(H) and (A 1 ) = (A ) 1. Note: By the Inverse Mapping Theorem, A is invertible in B(H) if and only if A is a bounded linear bijection. Proposition 1.4. If A B(H, K), then A = A = A A 1/2 = AA 1/2. Proof. In the course of proving Theorem 1.2, we already showed that A A. If f H, then Af 2 = Af, Af = A Af, f A Af f A Af f. (1.1) Hence Af A f (even if Af = 0, this is still true). Since this is true for all f we conclude that A A. Therefore A = A. Next, we have A A A A = A 2. But also, from the calculation in (1.1), we have Af 2 A Af f. Taking the supremum over all unit vectors, we obtain A 2 = sup Af 2 sup A Af f = A A. Consequently A 2 = A A. The final equality follows by interchanging the roles of A and A. Exercise 1.5. Prove that if U B(H, K), then U is an isomorphism if and only if U is invertible and U 1 = U. Exercise 1.6. Let {e n } n N be an orthonormal basis for a separable Hilbert space H. Then we know that every f H can be written f = f, e n e n. If λ = (λ n ) n N l (N) is given, then Lf = n=1 λ n f, e n e n (1.2) n=1 is a bounded linear map of L into itself. Find L.

ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES 3 Exercise 1.7. Let (, Ω, µ) be a measure space, and let φ L () be a fixed measurable function. Then M φ : L 2 () L 2 () given by M φ f = fφ, f L 2 () is a bounded linear operator. Prove that the adjoint of M φ is the multiplication operator M φ. Exercise 1.8. Let L and R be the left- and right-shift operators on l 2 (N), i.e., L(x 1, x 2,...) = (x 2, x 3,...) and R(x 1, x 2,...) = (0, x 1, x 2,...). Prove that L = R. Example 1.9. Let (, Ω, µ) be a σ-finite measure space. An integral operator is an operator of the form Lf(x) = k(x, y) f(y) dµ(y). (1.3) Assume that k is chosen so that L: L 2 () L 2 () is bounded. The adjoint is the unique operator L : L 2 () L 2 () which satisfies Lf, g = f, L g, f, g L 2 (). To find L, let A: L 2 () L 2 () be the integral operator with kernel k(y, x), i.e., Af(x) = k(y, x)f(y) dµ(y). Then, given any f and g L 2 (), we have f, L g = Lf, g = Lf(x) g(x)dµ(x) = = = = f(y) f(y) = f, Ag. k(x, y) f(y) dµ(y) g(x)dµ(x) k(x, y) g(x)dµ(x) dµ(y) k(x, y)g(x) dµ(x)dµ(y) f(y) Ag(y)dµ(y) By uniqueness of the adjoint, we must have L = A. Exercise: Justify the interchange in the order of integration in the above calculation, i.e., provide hypotheses under which the calculations above are justified.

4 ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES Exercise 1.10. Let {e n } n N be an orthonormal basis for a separable Hilbert space H. Define T : H l 2 (N) by T(f) = { f, e n } n N. Find a formula for T : l 2 (N) H. Definition 1.11. Let A B(H). (a) We say that A is self-adjoint or Hermitian if A = A. (b) We say that A is normal if AA = A A. Example 1.12. A real n n matrix A is self-adjoint if and only if it is symmetric, i.e., if A = A T. A complex n n matrix A is self-adjoint if and only if it is Hermitian, i.e., if A = A H. Exercise 1.13. Show that every self-adjoint operator is normal. Show that every unitary operator is normal, but that a unitary operator need not be self-adjoint. For H = C n, find examples of matrices that are not normal. Are the left- and right-shift operators on l 2 (N) normal? Exercise 1.14. (a) Show that if A, B B(H) are self-adjoint, then AB is self-adjoint if and only if AB = BA. (b) Give an example of self-adjoint operators A, B such that AB is not self-adjoint. (c) Show that if A, B B(H) are self-adjoint then A + A, AA, A A, A + B, ABA, and BAB are all self-adjoint. What about A A or A B? Show that AA A A is self-adjoint. Exercise 1.15. (a) Let λ = (λ n ) n N l (N) be given and let L be defined as in equation 1.2. Show that L is normal, find a formula for L, and prove that L is self-adjoint if and only if each λ n is real. (b) Determine a necessary and sufficient condition on φ so that the multiplication operator M φ defined in Exercise 1.7 is self-adjoint. (c) Determine a necessary and sufficient condition on the kernel k so that the integral operator L defined in equation(1.3) is self-adjoint. The following result gives a useful condition for telling when an operator on a complex Hilbert space is self-adjoint. Proposition 1.16. Let H be a complex Hilbert space (i.e., F = C), and let A B(H) be given. Then: A is self-adjoint Af, f R f H.

Proof.. Assume A = A. Then for any f H we have Therefore Af, f is real. ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES 5 Af, f = f, Af = A f, f = Af, f.. Assume that Af, f is real for all f. Choose any f, g H. Then A(f + g), f + g = Af, f + Af, g + Ag, f + Ag, g. Since A(f + g), f + g, Af, f, and Ag, g are all real, we conclude that Af, g + Ag, f is real. Hence it equals its own complex conjugate, i.e., Similarly, since we see that Af, g + Ag, f = Af, g + Ag, f = g, Af + f, Ag. (1.4) A(f + ig), f + ig = Af, f i Af, g + i Ag, f + Ag, g i Af, g + i Ag, f = i Af, g + i Ag, f = i g, Af i f, Ag. Multiplying through by i yields Adding (1.4) and (1.5) together, we obtain Af, g Ag, f = g, Af + f, Ag. (1.5) 2 Af, g = 2 f, Ag = 2 A f, g. Since this is true for every f and g, we conclude that A = A. Example 1.17. The preceding result is false for real Hilbert spaces. After all, if F = R then Af, f is real for every f no matter what A is. Therefore, any non-self-adjoint operator provides a counterexample. For example, if H = R n then any non-symmetric matrix A is a counterexample. The next result provides a useful way of calculating the operator norm of a self-adjoint operator. Proposition 1.18. If A B(H) is self-adjoint, then A = sup Af, f. Proof. Set M = sup Af, f. By Cauchy Schwarz and the definition of operator norm, we have M = sup Af, f sup Af f sup A f f = A. To get the opposite inequality, note that if f is any nonzero vector in H then f/ f is a unit vector, so A f, f f f M. Rearranging, we see that f H, Af, f M f 2. (1.6)

6 ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES Now choose any f, g H with f = g = 1. Then, by expanding the inner products, canceling terms, and using the fact that A = A, we see that A(f + g), f + g A(f g), f g = 2 Af, g + 2 Ag, f = 2 Af, g + 2 g, Af = 4 Re Af, g. Therefore, applying (1.6) and the Parallelogram Law, we have 4 Re Af, g A(f + g), f + g + A(f g), f g M f + g 2 + M f g 2 = 2M ( f 2 + g 2) = 4M. That is, Re Af, g M for every choice of unit vectors f and g. Write Af, g = Af, g e iθ. Then e iθ g is another unit vector, so M Re Af, e iθ g = Ree iθ Af, g = Af, g. Hence Af = sup Af, g M. g =1 Since this is true for every unit vector f, we conclude that A M. The following corollary is a very useful consequence. Corollary 1.19. Assume that A B(H). (a) If F = R, A = A, and Af, f = 0 for every f, then A = 0. (b) If F = C and Af, f = 0 for every f, then A = 0. Proof. Assume the hypotheses of either statement (a) or statement (b). In the case of statement (a), we have by hypothesis that A is self-adjoint. In the case of statement (b), we can conclude that A is self-adjoint because Af, f = 0 is real for every f. Hence in either case we can apply Proposition 1.18 to conclude that A = sup Af, f = 0. Lemma 1.20. If A B(H), then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is normal, i.e., AA = A A. (b) Af = A f for every f H.

ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES 7 Proof. (b) (a). Assume that (b) holds. Then for every f we have (A A AA )f, f = A Af, f AA f, f = Af, Af A f, A f = Af 2 A f 2 = 0. Since A A AA is self-adjoint, it follows from Corollary 1.19 that A A AA = 0. (a) (b). Exercise. Corollary 1.21. If A B(H) is normal, then ker(a) = ker(a ). Exercise 1.22. Suppose that A B(H) is normal. Prove that A is injective if and only if range(a) is dense in H. Exercise 1.23. If A B(H), then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is an isometry, i.e., Af = f for every f H. (b) A A = I. (c) Af, Ag = f, g for every f, g H. Exercise 1.24. If H = C n and A, B are n n matrices, then AB = I implies BA = I. Give a counterexample to this for an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. Consequently, the hypothesis A A = I in the preceding result does not imply that AA = I. Exercise 1.25. If A B(H), then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A A = AA = I. (b) A is unitary, i.e., it is a surjective isometry. (c) A is a normal isometry. The following result provides a very useful relationship between the range of A and the kernel of A. Theorem 1.26. Let A B(H, K). (a) ker(a) = range(a ). (b) ker(a) = range(a ). (c) A is injective if and only if range(a ) is dense in H.

8 ADJOINTS IN HILBERT SPACES Proof. (a) Assume that f ker(a) and let h range(a ), i.e., h = A g for some g K. Then since Af = 0, we have f, h = f, A g = Af, g = 0. Thus f range(a ), so ker(a) range(a ). Now assume that f range(a ). Then for any h H we have Af, h = f, A h = 0. But this implies Af = 0, so f ker(a). Thus range(a ) ker(a). (b), (c) Exercises.