Evaluation Model for the Sustainable Development of European Coastal Zones

Similar documents
1. Demand for property on the coast

2.- Area of built-up land

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

Sustainable coastal development indicator system studies in Latvia

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Mediterranean Sea and Territorial Development, Opportunities and Risks

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

The National Spatial Strategy

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

TOWARDS CLIMATE-RESILIENT COASTAL MANAGEMENT: OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVED ICZM IN BELIZE

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

Margarita Stancheva Hristo Stanchev & Robert Young 2. MEDCOAST JUBILEE WORKSHOP May 2015, Iberotel Sarigerme Park, Dalaman, Turkey

Towards an International Data Set for MST

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Mediteranean sea issues in the view of ESPON ESaTDOR project and Marine Spatial Planning in Slovenia

2. Defining fisheries areas

Country Fiche Lithuania

Contents: LEVANTE DE ALMERÍA A INFORMATION SYSTEM OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM RESULTS

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

Coastal Guide ICZM Information System

Taking into account people with special needs

Management Planning & Implementation of Communication Measures for Terrestrial Natura 2000 Sites in the Maltese Islands Epsilon-Adi Consortium

Applying GIS to Coastal Management in Cork Harbour: the Corepoint experience

The Socio Economic Development of the Marine Sector in the Atlantic Area. Stephen Hynes

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

The European Union and its Overseas Entities

Figure 10. Travel time accessibility for heavy trucks

Stepping into the sea - New evidence on territorial development and the opportunities and risks for European seas and maritime regions

Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning Andrej Abramić

IMA s ROLE IN COASTAL AND OCEAN GOVERNANCE IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO

City and SUMP of Ravenna

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan and Marine Spatial Planning

Population Trends Along the Coastal United States:

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

Regional stakeholders strategy of Donegal County Council

European Maritime Day conference 21 May Hon Karmenu Vella, Minister for Tourism welcome speech

Local Development Pilot Project: Island of Cres. Ranka Saračević Würth, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Croatia

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Implementing Rio+20: Integrated Planning For Sustainable Coastal Area Management In the Caribbean Region

Urban-Rural Partnerships in Europe

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Country Fiche Latvia Updated October 2016

ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS

Navigable maritime and river waterways in the seaside - Danube Delta area and the connected rural development

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Regional Plan 4: Integrating Ecosystem Services Mapping into Regional Land Use Planning

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion & Spatial Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Project Update. 13 th December 2012 San Sebastián, Basque Country

Aquaculture Spatial Planning: The case of Greece

Outline National legislative & policy context Regional history with ESSIM ESSIM Evaluation Phase Government Integration via RCCOM Regional ICOM Framew

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP): A practical approach to ecosystembased

Baltic Sea Region cooperation in Maritime Spatial Planning - HELCOM/VASAB

I. LIBYA I.1. COUNTRY CHARACTERISTICS. Country reports

Resolution XIII.23. Wetlands in the Arctic and sub-arctic

Agenzia per la coesione Territoriale. Obstacles on maritime borders

Edexcel GCSE Geography B: Fieldwork Ideas and Contexts for Tasks

INDICATORS FOR INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (ICZM)

MyCoast Elaboration of a vision and a strategy for Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Bulgaria

I. INTRODUCTION. 1 Regulation EU No 1303/2013 on the Common Provisions on the ESI Funds.

3. CRITERIA FOR SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION SPESP

Country reports. Israel did not establish an Exclusive Economic Zone. Consequently, its jurisdiction is restricted to the Israeli territorial waters.

FINLAND, A COOL ARCTIC COUNTRY WITH SNOW-HOW

State initiative following up the 2006 national planning report

Improving rural statistics. Defining rural territories and key indicators of rural development

HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

Tackling MSP integration challenges in the BSR

Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning in Preparing Territorial Development Strategies

MESMA: An integrated tool box to support an ecosystem based spatial management of marine areas

The Euroregion, which puts into practice the determination for active cooperation, has led to concrete actions such as:

Croatian physical planning system and strategic approach to MSP

European Regional and Urban Statistics

Summary. Recommendations on the Fifth Policy Document on Spatial Planning September 2001

ST AMBROSE CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL Geography Policy

Public Participatory GIS (ppgis), training & webgis in Mare Nostrum. Anna Spiteri, IRMCo Haifa, Israel, 5th March 2013

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission

Sustainable tourism in for Sustaibale Danang

Third Cohesion report February 2004

Real GDP Growth to Clock 6.75 Percent this Fiscal. Economic Survey Predicts Percent Growth in

PROPOSED MST RESEARCH PROGRAM

Maritime Spatial Planning: Transboundary Cooperation in the Celtic Seas Looking Ahead

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

Cross-border Maritime Spatial Plan for the Black sea - Romania and Bulgaria project

Interest for HOs to cooperate with EU Commission:

Ireland 2040 Our Plan. National Planning Framework

Policy framework The Netherlands and the Polar Regions, Summary and priorities

National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) Policy Coordination and Advisory Service

Tourism. April State Planning Policy state interest guideline. Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning

Transcription:

Evaluation Model for the Sustainable Development of European Coastal Zones SUMMARY

Interreg IIIC - South 2 INDEX 1.- INTRODUCTION... 3 2.- CONTEXT OF DEDUCE... 4 3.- CURRENT SITUATION AND CHALLENGES... 5 4.- OBJECTIVES... 6 5.- DEDUCE PARTNERS... 7 6.- PROJECT DESCRIPTION... 8 7.- ORGANISATION OF THE PROJECT... 11 8.- BUDGET... 12 9.- TIMING OF THE PROJECT... 12

Interreg IIIC - South 3 1.- INTRODUCTION The state and evolution of the coastal environment is one of the main concerns of the European Institutions. Most of the coastal zones in Europe are subject to high levels of human pressure. Almost 50% of the European population lives within 50 km of the coastline of Europe (89,000 km) and the economic resources that this strip generates represent a large part of the Union's wealth (tourism, fishing, transport, industry and trade). However, the intensive and growing use of natural coastal resources has a negative effect on the quality of the waters, the availability of water resources, the stability of the beaches, the marine and coastal ecology, the landscapes and the atmosphere, very frequently meaning that these zones are found in a at risk condition. This intensive use can lead to a devaluation of the natural capital of these zones and the resulting negative social and economic effects. Within this context, on 30 May 2002 the European Parliament and the Council, approved the Recommendation concerning the implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management with the aim of encouraging all coastal Member States and Candidate Countries to draw up in 2006 coastal strategies based on integrated management principles intended to guide European coastal zones towards more sustainable scenarios. Within this framework, an Interreg IIIC South DEDUCE project was initiated, which is aimed at validating essential methodological tools that foster the strategies of integrated coastal zone management following the principles and criteria established in the Recommendation. The main decision-making tools which will be used for experimenting data-management are: Indicators for the integrated management of coastal zones Geographical information systems of the coast Reports on the state of sustainability of the coast Networking the information on the coast

Interreg IIIC - South 4 2.- CONTEXT OF DEDUCE Within the framework of the introduction of the European Recommendation, the European Commission created the EU Integrated Coastal Zone Management Expert Group (EU ICZM), which set up a Working Group on Indicators and Data (WG-ID) with the aim of defining a system of indicators that would serve the European institutions and the Member States to evaluate and follow-up the sustainability of the state of the coast. The result of the work carried out by the WG-ID is a list of twenty-eight indicators that are structured as per the seven main objectives of the European Recommendation: To control, as appropriate, further development of the undeveloped coast. To protect, enhance and celebrate, natural and cultural diversity. To promote and support a dynamic and sustainable coastal economy. To ensure that beaches are clean and the coastal waters are unpolluted. To reduce social exclusion and promote social cohesion in coastal communities. To use natural resources wisely. To recognise the threat to coastal zones posed by climate change and to ensure appropriate and ecologically responsible coastal protection.

Interreg IIIC - South 5 The DEDUCE project is based on the twenty-eight indicators set up by the Working Group on Indicators & Data of the European Commission (WG-ID) and organises a process of calculation, validation and analysis of the findings at all decision-making levels: European, national, regional and local. DEDUCE European European European National National National WG-ID Regional Local Chronology of approval of the DEDUCE project 30/04/2004 Presentation of the dossier of the candidature of the DEDUCE project to the Joint Technical Secretariat of the Interreg III C South programme (Department of Economy, Treasury and Employment of the Government of Valencia). 27/07/2004 The Programming Committee of the Joint Technical Secretariat approved the DEDUCE project. 18/01/2005 Signing of the Fund Allocation Contract between the Joint Technical Secretariat and the Department of the Environment and Housing of the Government of Catalonia, acting as the Leader of the project. 3.- CURRENT SITUATION AND CHALLENGES The coastal areas, despite their strategic, economic, cultural and environmental importance, are not particularly visible. This invisibility makes it impossible to fully capture the processes that take place in reality, generates a lack of knowledge and, as a result of this, leads to decisions that are not always the correct ones being made by the agents who intervene in this area. The invisibility of the processes on the coast contrasts with the great quantity and dispersion of information available that often makes the problem even greater. Therefore, it is essential to organise and structure the data by means of indicators that highlight the main problems and processes.

Interreg IIIC - South 6 The main challenge for DEDUCE is to show the use, feasibility and need for the integrated focusing of information through indicators for an integrated management of European coastal zones. 4.- OBJECTIVES The main objective of the DEDUCE project is to improve the tools and the information systems necessary for optimal decision making about the coast, at all levels: European, national, regional and local. The specific objectives are: 1. To calculate and compare the 28 indicators of sustainable development agreed. 2. To evaluate and compare the geographical information systems (GIS) for the analysis and viewing of the state of the environment of each of the coastal areas and the methodologies based on the use of the GIS through the website (GIS-WEB). 3. To establish common model for reporting on the state of sustainability of the coast, in which the effects of human activities and their impacts are evaluated and monitored. 4. To draw up a guide for the use of the indicators of sustainability for examining the development of the state of the coast. 5. To study the possibility of setting a European regional information observatory. Amongst all the partners in the project there is representation from European, state, regional and local bodies, which will enable us to check whether the methodology that is defined by the calculation of the indicators is useful and feasible for the various territorial levels and existing information systems.

Interreg IIIC - South 7 5.- DEDUCE PARTNERS There are nine partners which will participate in the development of the project: Department of the Environment and Housing. Government of Catalonia. Spain Prat de Llobregat Town Council. Spain Viladecans Town Council. Spain The Autonomous University of Barcelona European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment (ETC/TE) of the European Environment Agency. Spain Institut Français de l Environnement (IFEN) which depends on the French Ministry of the Environment. France Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA). Malta Province of Western Flanders. Belgium University of Latvia Maritime Institute in Gdansk. Poland Map of the participating partners of DEDUCE

Interreg IIIC - South 8 6.- PROJECT DESCRIPTION The DEDUCE project contains five main actions, which are described in chronological order: 6.1. Calculation of indicators for a sustainable development of the coast. This consists of defining and agreeing on the suitable methodologies and carrying out the calculation of the indicators of all the decision levels (European, national, regional and local), with the objective of identifying gaps in the information and the use and compatibility of the indicators. The indicators approved by the WG-ID and which will be used in the DEDUCE project are: GOALS No INDICATORS MEASUREMENTS 1 DEMAND FOR PROPERTY ON THE COAST 11. Size and structure of the population living on the coast To control as appropriate further development of the undeveloped coast 2 AREA OF BUILT-UP LAND 21. Percent of built-up land by distance from the coastline 3 RATE OF DEVELOPMENT OF PREVIOUSLY UNDEVELOPED LAND 4 DEMAND FOR ROAD TRAVEL ON THE COAST 31. Area converted from non-developed to developed land uses 41. Volume of traffic on coastal motorways and major roads To protect, enhance and celebrate natural and cultural diversity 5 PRESSURE FOR COASTAL AND MARINE RECREATION 6 LAND TAKE BY INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE 7 AMOUNT OF SEMI-NATURAL HABITAT 8 AREA OF LAND AND SEA PROTECTED BY STATUTORY DESIGNATIONS 9 EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF DESIGNATED SITES 10 CHANGE TO SIGNIFICANT COASTAL AND MARINE HABITATS AND SPECIES 51. Number of berths and moorings for recreational boating 61. Proportion of agricultural land farmed intensively 71. Area of semi-natural habitat 81. Area protected for nature conservation, landscape and heritage 91. Rate of loss of, or damage to, protected areas 101. Status and trend of specified habitats and species 102. Number of species per habitat type 103. Number of Red List coastal area species

Interreg IIIC - South 9 11 LOSS OF CULTURAL DISTINCTIVENESS 12 PATTERNS OF SECTORAL EMPLOYMENT 111. Number and value of sales of local products with regional quality labels or European PDO/PGI/TSG 121. Full time, part time and seasonal employment per sector To promote and support a dynamic and sustainable coastal economy To ensure that beaches are clean and that coastal waters are unpolluted To reduce social exclusion and promote social cohesion in coastal communities To use natural resources wisely 13 VOLUME OF PORT TRAFFIC 14 INTENSITY OF TOURISM 15 SUSTAINABLE TOURISM 16 QUALITY OF BATHING WATER 17 AMOUNT OF COASTAL, ESTUARINE AND MARINE LITTER 18 CONCENTRATION OF NUTRIENTS IN COASTAL WATERS 19 AMOUNT OF OIL POLLUTION 20 DEGREE OF SOCIAL COHESION 21 RELATIVE HOUSEHOLD PROSPERITY 22 SECOND AND HOLIDAY HOMES 23 FISH STOCKS AND FISH LANDINGS 122. Value added per sector 131. Number of incoming and outgoing passengers per port 132. Total volume of goods handled per port 133. Proportion of goods carried by short sea routes 141. Number of overnight stays in tourist accommodation 142. Occupancy rate of bed places 151. Number of tourist accommodations holding EU Eco-label 152. Ratio of overnight stays to number of residents 161. Percent of bathing waters compliant with the guide value of the European Bathing Water Directive 171. Volume of litter collected per given length of shoreline 181. Concentration of nitrates and phosphates in coastal waters 192. Volume of accidental oil spills 193. Number of observed oil slicks from aerial surveillance 201. Indices of social exclusion by area 211. Average household income 212. Percent of population with a higher education qualification 213. Value of residential property 221. Ratio of first to second and holiday homes 231. State of the main fish stocks by species and sea area 232. Recruitment and spawning stock biomass by species 233. Landings and fish mortality by species 234. Value of landings by port and species 24 WATER CONSUMPTION 241. Number of days of reduced supply To recognise the thereat to coastal zones posed by 25 SEA LEVEL RISE AND EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS 251. Number of stormy days 252. Rise in sea level relative to land

Interreg IIIC - South 10 climate change and to ensure appropriate and ecologically responsible coastal protection Implementation of ICZM 26 COASTAL EROSION AND ACCRETION 27 NATURAL, HUMAN AND ECONOMIC ASSETS AT RISK 28 INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 261. Length of protected and defended coastline 262. Length of dynamic coastline 263. Area and volume of sand nourishment 271. Number of people living within an at risk zone 272. Area of protected sites within an at risk zone 273. Value of economic assets within an at risk zone. 274. Progress in the implementation of the ICZM 6.2. Strengths and weaknesses of an integrated information system based on a GIS. This consists of analysing the use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) as tools for storage, presentation and analysis of the coastal data and analysing the use of the website as a tool for disseminating data (SIG- WEB) and the joint work between partners. 6.3. Report on the state of the sustainability of the coast. Assessment of common models for drawing up reports on the state of the coast at European, national, regional and local levels, which assess the changes and the effects of human activity on the coast. 6.4. Guides on the use of the indicators for decision making. Drawing up guidelines for the use of European, national, regional and local governments on the indicators of sustainability in carrying out decision making on the coast, through examples. 6.5. To study the possibilities of creating a European regional coastal observatory.

Interreg IIIC - South 11 7.- ORGANISATION OF THE PROJECT The DEDUCE project is directed and co-ordinated by the project Leader, the Government of Catalonia, through its Department of the Environment and Housing. The administrative management and follow-up on the project is done by the Network Management Group (NMG), made up of a representative from each of the participating partners in the project. This Management group will meet seven times during the project, in a different city each time. Coinciding with the meetings of the NMG, six Regional Working Groups will be organised for the Assessment of Indicators (Regional Assessment Workshops), which are the meeting place for governmental representatives and experts on the coast to debate about the indicators and their use. The following table summarises the calendar for the administrative and technical meetings of the DEDUCE project, planned until June 2007: Phase Network Management Group (MNG) Regional Assessment Working Groups Presentation to the European Parliament Final conference 1 March 2005 (Barcelona) July 2005 (Malta) 2 November 2005 (Ostend) November (Ostend) 3 March 2006 (Paris) July (Gdansk) March 2006 (Paris) July (Gdansk) September 2006 (Italy) 4 November 2006 (Riga) November 2006 (Riga) December 2006 (Barcelona) 5 March 2007 (Brussels) June 2007 (Barcelona) March 2007 (Brussels) June 2007 (Barcelona)

Interreg IIIC - South 12 8.- BUDGET 8.1. Cost of the project The total budget for the project is 1,656,954. Partners 664,035 40% European Union 992,919 60% 8.2. Contribution of the partners Below is the list of total costs for each partner: PARTNERS Total (Euros) Department of the Environment and Housing, Spain 324,672 Prat de Llobregat Town Council, Spain 28,450 Viladecans Town Council, Spain 53,000 Autonomous University of Barcelona (ETC/TE), Spain 210,032 Institut Français de l Environement (IFEN), France 173,000 Malta Environment and Planning Authority, Malta 219,256 Province of Western Flanders. Belgium 210,032 University of Latvia, Latvia 219,256 Maritime Institute in Gdansk, Poland 219,256 TOTAL 1,656,954 9.- TIMING OF THE PROJECT The project runs from October 2004 till June 2007.