SIMULATION OF THE RESITIVE FORCES ACTING ON THE BUCKET OF WHEEL LOADER BY USE OF DEM

Similar documents
Vibratory conveyance of granular materials M. Saeki*l and E. Takano*2

Automatic Breaking System of Large Rocks by use of Force Sensors

ME 230 Kinematics and Dynamics

Terra-Mechanical Simulation Using Distinct Element Method

Chapter 4. Motion in Two Dimensions

Chapter 4. Motion in Two Dimensions. Professor Wa el Salah

PLANAR KINETIC EQUATIONS OF MOTION (Section 17.2)

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING MECHANICS QUESTION BANK UNIT I - PART-A

Analysis of ball movement for research of grinding mechanism of a stirred ball mill with 3D discrete element method

1 Motion of a single particle - Linear momentum, work and energy principle

Chapter 4. Motion in Two Dimensions

Chapter 4. Motion in Two Dimensions. With modifications by Pinkney

3. Kinetics of Particles

PHYS 101 Previous Exam Problems. Kinetic Energy and

Fluid-soil multiphase flow simulation by an SPH-DEM coupled method

Chapter 4. Motion in Two Dimensions

CEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 9: Ch.13, Sec.4-5

Friction. Modeling, Identification, & Analysis

Performance evaluation of first stage support system of launcher

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM NAGAR, KATTANKULATHUR DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Where, m = slope of line = constant c = Intercept on y axis = effort required to start the machine

(Refer Slide Time: 01:15)

Old Exam. Question Chapter 7 072

Announcements. Principle of Work and Energy - Sections Engr222 Spring 2004 Chapter Test Wednesday

MOTION IN TWO OR THREE DIMENSIONS

Improvement of Calculation Stability for Slow Fluid Flow Analysis Using Particle Method *

A B Ax Bx Ay By Az Bz

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

The... of a particle is defined as its change in position in some time interval.

Note: Referred equations are from your textbook.


Projectile Motion. directions simultaneously. deal with is called projectile motion. ! An object may move in both the x and y

Physics 20 Practice Problems for Exam 1 Fall 2014

The Self-Excite Vibrations of Multi-Scoop Digger Machine

Normal Force. W = mg cos(θ) Normal force F N = mg cos(θ) F N

Chapter 10: Friction A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor an individual perfected without


Find the magnitude of F when t = 2. (9 marks)

Model Answers Attempt any TEN of the following :

Force, Energy & Periodic Motion. Preparation for unit test

WORK, POWER AND ENERGY

q 1 F m d p q 2 Figure 1: An automated crane with the relevant kinematic and dynamic definitions.

Faculty of Engineering and Department of Physics Engineering Physics 131 Midterm Examination Monday February 24, 2014; 7:00 pm 8:30 pm

Mechanics Answers to Examples B (Momentum) - 1 David Apsley

Chapter 12 Static Equilibrium

Everybody remains in a state of rest or continues to move in a uniform motion, in a straight line, unless acting on by an external force.

Jurong Junior College 2014 J1 H1 Physics (8866) Tutorial 3: Forces (Solutions)

2. a) Explain the equilibrium of i) Concurrent force system, and ii) General force system.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Physics Physics IC_W05D1 ConcepTests

24/06/13 Forces ( F.Robilliard) 1

Proceedings oh the 18th IAHR International Symposium on Ice (2006) DISCRETE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF ICE PILE-UP AGAINST AN INCLINED STRUCTURE

l1, l2, l3, ln l1 + l2 + l3 + ln

R.SUNDARAVADIVELU Professor IIT Madras,Chennai - 36.

Rotational Kinematics and Dynamics. UCVTS AIT Physics

STATICS. FE Review. Statics, Fourteenth Edition R.C. Hibbeler. Copyright 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter 3 Kinetics of Particle: Work & Energy

1. What would be the value of F1 to balance the system if F2=20N? 20cm T =? 20kg

4) Vector = and vector = What is vector = +? A) B) C) D) E)

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Energy Conservation AP

DEM Simulation of Soil Loosening Process Caused by a Vibrating Subsoiler

PHYS 1303 Final Exam Example Questions

SOLUTION T 1 + U 1-2 = T C(31.5)(2.5)A10 6 B(0.2)D = 1 2 (7)(v 2) 2. v 2 = 2121 m>s = 2.12 km>s. Ans. (approx.

Chapter 6. Circular Motion and Other Applications of Newton s Laws

18.02 Multivariable Calculus Fall 2007

Q2. A machine carries a 4.0 kg package from an initial position of d ˆ. = (2.0 m)j at t = 0 to a final position of d ˆ ˆ

Antiderivatives. Definition A function, F, is said to be an antiderivative of a function, f, on an interval, I, if. F x f x for all x I.

Phys101 First Major-111 Zero Version Monday, October 17, 2011 Page: 1

N - W = 0. + F = m a ; N = W. Fs = 0.7W r. Ans. r = 9.32 m

Newton s Laws.

James T. Shipman Jerry D. Wilson Charles A. Higgins, Jr. Omar Torres. Chapter 2 Motion Cengage Learning

KINEMATICS OF A PARTICLE. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Analysis of Damage of Asphalt Pavement due to Dynamic Load of Heavy Vehicles Caused by Surface Roughness

4.0 m s 2. 2 A submarine descends vertically at constant velocity. The three forces acting on the submarine are viscous drag, upthrust and weight.

N mg N Mg N Figure : Forces acting on particle m and inclined plane M. (b) The equations of motion are obtained by applying the momentum principles to

6-1. Conservation law of mechanical energy

STICK-SLIP MOTION IN PNEUMATIC CYLINDERS DRIVEN BY METER-OUT CIRCUIT

PHYSICS 221, FALL 2009 EXAM #1 SOLUTIONS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

2.003 Engineering Dynamics Problem Set 6 with solution

Other Examples of Energy Transfer

Figure 5.28 (a) Spring-restrained cylinder, (b) Kinematic variables, (c) Free-body diagram

Rutgers University Department of Physics & Astronomy. 01:750:271 Honors Physics I Fall Lecture 10. Home Page. Title Page. Page 1 of 37.

Physics 1A. Lecture 3B

POTENTIAL ENERGY AND ENERGY CONSERVATION

Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction

THE WORK OF A FORCE, THE PRINCIPLE OF WORK AND ENERGY & SYSTEMS OF PARTICLES

ONLINE: MATHEMATICS EXTENSION 2 Topic 6 MECHANICS 6.6 MOTION IN A CIRCLE

Lesson 7: Thermal and Mechanical Element Math Models in Control Systems. 1 lesson7et438a.pptx. After this presentation you will be able to:

Practice Test for Midterm Exam

Review of Engineering Dynamics

Chapter 3 HW Solution

1. A sphere with a radius of 1.7 cm has a volume of: A) m 3 B) m 3 C) m 3 D) 0.11 m 3 E) 21 m 3

Earthquake response analysis of rock-fall models by discontinuous deformation analysis

SECTION A. 8 kn/m. C 3 m 3m

AP Calculus AB Chapter 2 Test Review #1

7. The gyroscope. 7.1 Introduction. 7.2 Theory. a) The gyroscope

Advanced Higher Mathematics of Mechanics

Computational Simulation of the Hydraulic Fracturing Process

Chapter 10. Rotation of a Rigid Object about a Fixed Axis

Foundation Analysis LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE

Transcription:

SIMULATION OF THE RESITIVE FORCES ACTING ON THE BUCKET OF WHEEL LOADER BY USE OF DEM Hiroshi TAKAHASHI Department of Geoscience and Technology Graduate School of Engineering Tohoku University Sendai 980-8579, JAPAN ABSTRACT In order to automate the scooping task, it is necessary to obtain the theoretical resistive forces acting on the bucket. The resistive forces strongly depend on the shape changing process of the rock pile due to the bucket movement. In other words, in order to derive the theoretical model on the resistive forces, the shape changing process of the rock pile due to the bucket movement has to be made clear. In this paper, the behavior of particles in the rock pile due to the bucket movement was simulated by use of DEM (Distinct Element Method). Furthermore, the resistive forces acting on the bucket were calculated and compared with the experimental ones. INTRODUCTION Robotics has been receiving considerable attention in many fields, especially in mining and construction field because the working environment in these fields is very severe for workers. Many tasks in these fields have been mechanized and some of them are already carried out automatically [1-4]. However, the scooping task is much more difficult to automate compared to other tasks because the interaction between the bucket and crushed rocks is very complicated and many parameters are necessary to describe the scooping phenomena. In order to automate the scooping task, the resistive forces acting on the bucket of wheel loaders have to be obtained before the scooping task is performed [5]. And the resistive forces strongly depend on the shape changing process of the rock pile due to the bucket movement In this study, the behavior of particles in the rock pile due to the bucket movement is simulated by use of DEM (Distinct Element Method)[6]. Furthermore, the resistive forces acting on the bucket are calculated and compared with the experimental ones obtained in the previous research. PRINCIPLE OF DEM DEM is often used to analyze the behavior of granular materials. In the calculation of DEM, an equation of motion is given in each element to analyze the behavior of elements. In order to derive the equation of motion, it is necessary to estimate the forces acting among elements. Usually, the model as shown in Figure 1 is used. The actual scooping process is three dimensional, but it is sometimes simplified and is analyzed two dimensionally. Therefore, two-dimensional model was assumed in this study. In this case, each element is assumed to be a circular disc, and the radius of the disc defines the size of element. When the two elements contact each other, a spring

and a dashpot are introduced between two elements in the normal and tangential direction. The spring and dashpot indicate the effect of elasticity and viscous resistance, respectively. Furthermore, a slider is set in the tangential direction to consider the frictional effect. ϕ Fig. 1 Contact model in DEM ϕ Fig.2 Schematic Diagram of element contact The equation of motion of element is given by Eq.(1). Fx = mx, Fy = my, M = Iϕ Here, (x,y) is the coordinate of central gravity of the element, ϕ is the rotation of the element, F x and F y are total contact forces and body forces acting on the element. Figure 2 shows the schematic diagram of the contact between two elements. The contact between two elements can be judged by the following equations. Ri + Rj Rij 2 2 Rij = ( xj xi ) + ( yj yi ) The normal direction coincides with the line connecting between the center of two elements. Now, let the angle between above mentioned line and x-axis be ij. Then, the next equation can be obtained. ( xj xi) cosα ij = Rij ( yj yi) sinα ij = Rij The increment of relative displacement of the element in the time interval of calculation in the normal and tangential direction are expressed as follows: u = ( x x )cos α ( y y )sinα n j i ij j i ij us = ( x j xi )sinα ij + ( y j yi ) cosα ij Ri ϕ i R j ϕ j Here, t is the time interval of calculation, x and y are the increment of displacement in x and y direction, ϕ is the increment of rotation. The suffix, i and j indicate each element. Normal direction The increment of the force in the normal direction due to the spring, e n and the force due to the viscous dashpot, d n are expressed by the following equations.

en = kn un u dn = η n n t Here, k n is the spring constant in the normal direction, n is the viscous coefficient. Tangential direction The increment of the force in the tangential direction due to the spring, e s and the force due to the viscous dashpot, d s are expressed by the following equations. es = ks us u ds = η s s t Here, k s is the spring constant in the tangential direction, and s is the viscous coefficient. e n and e s can be obtained by adding each increment to the values at t=t dt. When the two elements are separated, no force will act on two elements. Therefore, the following condition is necessary. en < 0, en = dn = es = ds = 0 From above equations, the forces acting on two elements in the normal and tangential direction are expressed, respectively as follows: fn = en + dn, fs = es + ds The next condition should be introduced based on the assumption that the frictional force in the frictional direction follows the Coulomb s law. f if fs > µ f, then s n f s = µ f n f s Here, S is the frictional coefficient between two elements. The next step is to obtain the total forces from all elements, which are contacting with the element, i. Total forces acting on the element, i in x and y direction and total moment are expressed, respectively. F = ( f cosα f sin α ) + B xi j nj ij sj ij F = ( f sin α + f cos α ) + B yi j nj ij sj ij yi xi Mi = ri( j fsj) Here, B x and B y are body forces in x and y direction. The acceleration of the element is given by x = Fxi / mi, y = Fyi / mi, ϕ = Mi / Ii Here, m i is the mass of the element and I i is the inertial moment of the element. In the calculation, the above equations are integrated to obtain the displacement in t. Then, the same calculation is repeated by using the obtained displacement as an initial value for the next step of calculation. CALCULATION OF THE FORCES BETWEEN THE BUCKET AND PARTICLES When the bucket is penetrated into the rock pile, it is necessary to estimate the forces between the bucket wall and particles. In the case that the bucket wall contacts

with the particles, the element with having zero-radius is assumed at the cross section of the bucket wall and the line from the center of element, which is perpendicular to the bucket wall. Physical properties, which are necessary for DEM simulation, are listed in Table 1. Table 1 Physical properties used in the DEM simulation Time Interval 0.00001sec. Designed Value Number of Particles 374 Designed Value Particle Diameter 12mm Designed Value Slope of the Rock Pile 34 degrees Designed Value Density of Particles 2.5g/cm 3 Measured Value Friction Coefficient between the Bucket and Particles 0.59 Measured Value Friction Coefficient among 0.93 Measured Value Particles Spring Constant 5.010 8 g/s 2 Assumed Value Coefficient of Viscosity 8000g/s Assumed Value Air Resistance 100g/s Assumed Value SIMULATION RESULTS Penetration of the bucket into the rock pile Figures 3 and 4 show the particle behavior and trajectories when the bucket penetrates into the rock pile. The penetration speed of the bucket is 5cm/sec in this simulation. The simulation was carried out in the Sun work station and calculation time was about 50 hours. In our previous visualization experiment of the shape change of the rock pile [7], it has been already confirmed that the particle trajectories are divided into three regions, that is, 1)the region which moves horizontally with the bucket movement, 2)the region which moves upward with sliding on the failure plane and 3)the region which does not move. It was confirmed from Figures 3 and 4 that the simulation results show the same tendency as the experimental results. Figure 5 shows the comparison between the simulated resistive forces acting on the bucket and measured resistive forces. The solid line indicates the simulated results and white circles indicate the measured resistive forces. The details about the experiments to measure the resistive forces are described in the reference [7]. Since the simulation is two dimensional, simulated results were multiplied by the bucket width that was used in the experiment, and were compared with the measured resistive forces. The horizontal axis shows the non-dimensional distance (X and L show the penetration distance and bucket bottom length, respectively). The DEM simulation does not consider the frictional force between the bucket side and particles. However, it was already confirmed that the effect of the frictional resistive force is very small. Therefore, simulated results well agree with the experimental results, although the fluctuation of the simulation results is very large. Lifting of the bucket to scoop the rocks Few studies have dealt with the internal change of the rock pile while scooping the rocks because the visualization of the internal shape change of the rock pile is

very difficult. However, it is inevitable to know the internal shape change of the rock pile in the theoretical analysis on the resistive forces acting on the bucket of the loading machine. Therefore, the behavior of rocks by lifting the bucket was simulated. 15 Measured Values Simulated Results Force [kgf] 10 5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 X/L [-] Fig.5 Comparison between Simulated Resistive Forces and Measured Ones Fig.6 Schematic Diagram of the Bucket Movement in the Scooping Task Some studies have already been conducted on the planning of the scooping, and it was reported that from the energy consumption of view, the smooth movement of the bucket from the skirts of the rock pile is the best. However, the most effective planning of scooping is not still made clear. Therefore, it was assumed that scooping strategy was as shown in Figure 6 with considering the task by an expert operator, that is, 1) the bucket is penetrated into the rock pile at distance, D, 2) then, the bucket is lifted to scoop the rocks. When the task is finished, it is assumed that the bucket tip is on the surface of the rock pile. Then, the scooped area by the bucket in Figure 6 is expressed by the next equation. sinθ sinα 2 S = D (19) 2(sinθ sinα) The distance D is determined so that the scooped area is equal to the bucket area. Figures 7 and 8 show the particle behavior and trajectories when the bucket is lifted to scoop the rocks. The lifting speed of the bucket is 5cm/sec in this simulation. It was confirmed that the particle trajectories are divided into three regions, that is, 1) the region which moves with the bucket movement, 2) the region which slides down to the bucket bottom and 3) the region which does not move. CONCLUSIONS The behavior of particles in the rock pile due to the bucket movement was simulated by use of DEM. Since the scooping task is usually carried out by two steps, that is, the penetration and lifting of the bucket, the trajectory of the bucket movement was assumed as shown in Figure 6. The shape changing process of the rock pile was made clear from the simulated results. These results will give useful information for the theoretical consideration on the resistive forces acting on the bucket in the scooping task.

REFERENCES [1] M.St-Amant et al. : A Simple Robust Vision System for Underground Vehicle Guidance, Proc. of 1st Int. Int. Symposium on Mine Mechanization and Automation, pp.6/1-10, 1991. [2] P.H.King et al. : Ultrasonic Rangers for Underground Mine Equipment Navigation, Proc. of 1st Int. Int. Symposium on Mine Mechanization and Automation, pp.6/31-44, 1991. [3] M.K.Petty : Autonomous LHD Loading, Proc. of 4th Annual Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, pp.219-224, 1997. [4] T.Gocho et al. : Automatic Wheel-Loader in Asphalt Plant, Proc. of 9th Int. Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, pp.803-812, 1992. [5] A.Hemami : Force Analysis in the Scooping/Loading Operation of an LHD Loader, Proc. of 2nd Int. Int. Symposium on Mine Mechanization and Automation, pp.415-424, 1993. [6] P.A.Cundall and O.D.L.Strack : A Discrete Numerical model for Granular Assemblies, Geotechnique, Vol.29, No.1, pp.47-65, 1979. [7] H.Takahashi, Y.Tsukamoto and E.Nakano: Fundamental Study on the Resistive Force Acting on the Bucket during Scooping of Piled Rock Fragments, Trans. of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.63, No.609, pp.1491-1497, 1997.

Fig.3 Behavior of particles (Penetration process) Fig.4 Trajectory of particles (Penetration process)

Fig.7 Behavior of particles (Lifting process) Fig.8 Trajectory of particles (Lifting process)