Lecture 35: Introduction to Quantum Transport in Devices

Similar documents
Simple Theory of the Ballistic Nanotransistor

Lecture 1 Nanoscale MOSFETs. Course Structure Basic Concepts (1-38)

Lecture 3: Density of States

Lecture 22: Ionized Impurity Scattering

OMEN an atomistic and full-band quantum transport simulator for post-cmos nanodevices

ECE 305: Fall MOSFET Energy Bands

ECE-305: Spring 2016 MOSFET IV

Physics of Nanoscale Transistors

Microsystems Technology Laboratories, MIT. Teledyne Scientific Company (TSC)

Impact of Silicon Wafer Orientation on the Performance of Metal Source/Drain MOSFET in Nanoscale Regime: a Numerical Study

Simulating Quantum Transport in Nanoscale Transistors: Real versus Mode-Space Approaches. Abstract

Lecture 11: Coupled Current Equations: and thermoelectric devices

Quantum Corrections for Monte Carlo Simulation

Lecture 8: Ballistic FET I-V

The BTE with a B-field: Simple Approach

Energy Bands & Carrier Densities

Performance Analysis of 60-nm Gate-Length III-V InGaAs HEMTs: Simulations Versus Experiments

Ultra-Scaled InAs HEMTs

The BTE with a High B-field

NANOSCALE MOSFETS: PHYSICS, SIMULATION AND DESIGN

Solar Cell Physics: recombination and generation

MOSFET. Id-Vd curve. I DS Transfer curve V G. Lec. 8. Vd=1V. Saturation region. V Th

Lecture 9. Strained-Si Technology I: Device Physics

Non-equilibrium Green s functions: Rough interfaces in THz quantum cascade lasers

Performance Analysis of Ultra-Scaled InAs HEMTs

Basic Principles of Light Emission in Semiconductors

A Numerical Study of Scaling Issues for Schottky Barrier Carbon Nanotube Transistors

Electrostatics of Nanowire Transistors

Courtesy of S. Salahuddin (UC Berkeley) Lecture 4

Three Most Important Topics (MIT) Today

Towards Atomistic Simulations of the Electro-Thermal Properties of Nanowire Transistors Mathieu Luisier and Reto Rhyner

Towards a Scalable EKV Compact Model Including Ballistic and Quasi-Ballistic Transport


Parallel Ensemble Monte Carlo for Device Simulation

2.4 Quantum confined electrons

MONTE CARLO MODELING OF HEAT GENERATION IN ELECTRONIC NANOSTRUCTURES

A Quantum Mechanical Analysis of Channel Access Geometry and Series Resistance in nanoscale transistors. Abstract

ECE-305: Spring Carrier Action: II. Pierret, Semiconductor Device Fundamentals (SDF) pp

THE CARRIER velocity in a MOSFET channel near the

Chapter 12: Semiconductors

MOS Capacitor MOSFET Devices. MOSFET s. INEL Solid State Electronics. Manuel Toledo Quiñones. ECE Dept. UPRM.

Essential Physics of Carrier Transport in Nanoscale MOSFETs

BALLISTIC and quantum mechanical effects are becoming

SECTION: Circle one: Alam Lundstrom. ECE 305 Exam 5 SOLUTIONS: Spring 2016 April 18, 2016 M. A. Alam and M.S. Lundstrom Purdue University

Analysis of InAs Vertical and Lateral Band-to-Band Tunneling. Transistors: Leveraging Vertical Tunneling for Improved Performance

Potential Descending Principle, Dynamic Law of Physical Motion and Statistical Theory of Heat

Electro-Thermal Transport in Silicon and Carbon Nanotube Devices E. Pop, D. Mann, J. Rowlette, K. Goodson and H. Dai

Challenges in the introduction of Band to Band tunneling in semiclassical models for Tunnel-FETs. DIEGM - University of Udine, IU.

Single Particle Transport in Nanostructures : Theory, Implementation and Examples

ECE 495N, Fall 09 Fundamentals of Nanoelectronics Final examination: Wednesday 12/16/09, 7-9 pm in CIVL 1144.

Modern Physics. Unit 6: Hydrogen Atom - Radiation Lecture 6.5: Optical Absorption. Ron Reifenberger Professor of Physics Purdue University

ECE606: Solid State Devices Lecture 3

Electrical Characteristics of MOS Devices

Solid State Device Fundamentals

Scattering Theory of Carrier Transport in Semiconductor Devices

Lecture 6: 2D FET Electrostatics

Summary lecture VI. with the reduced mass and the dielectric background constant

The Critical Role of Quantum Capacitance in Compact Modeling of Nano-Scaled and Nanoelectronic Devices

Long-channel MOSFET IV Corrections

Lecture 3: Transistor as an thermonic switch

Simulating quantum transport in nanoscale MOSFETs: Ballistic hole transport, subband engineering and boundary conditions

Nanoscience, MCC026 2nd quarter, fall Quantum Transport, Lecture 1/2. Tomas Löfwander Applied Quantum Physics Lab

Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, Kampar, Perak, Malaysia. 2 Lee Kong Cian Faculty of Engineering and Science, UniversitiTunku Abdul Rahman,

Bipolar quantum corrections in resolving individual dopants in atomistic device simulation

Summary of Lecture Notes on Subbands, Density of States, and Current in Ballistic Nanowires and Nanotransistors

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Diameter Optimization for Highest Degree of Ballisticity of Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistors I. Khan, O. Morshed and S. M.

Subbands and quantum confinement

Low Bias Transport in Graphene: An Introduction

Bandstructure Effects in Silicon Nanowire Electron Transport

Final Exam. Tuesday, May 8, Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall.

Comparison of Ultra-Thin InAs and InGaAs Quantum Wells and Ultra-Thin-Body Surface-Channel MOSFETs

A QUANTITATIVE MODEL FOR QUANTUM TRANSPORT IN NANO-TRANSISTORS

Screening in Ultrashort (5 nm) Channel MoS2 Transistors: A Full-Band Quantum Transport Study

nmosfet Schematic Four structural masks: Field, Gate, Contact, Metal. Reverse doping polarities for pmosfet in N-well.

An Effective Potential Approach to Modelling 25nm MOSFET Devices S. Ahmed 1 C. Ringhofer 2 D. Vasileska 1

Nanoscience and Molecular Engineering (ChemE 498A) Semiconductor Nano Devices

Ultimately Scaled CMOS: DG FinFETs?

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Materials Science 11 (2015 )

Lecture 8. Equations of State, Equilibrium and Einstein Relationships and Generation/Recombination

Section 12: Intro to Devices

Appendix 1: List of symbols

Computational Model of Edge Effects in Graphene Nanoribbon Transistors

ELEC 3908, Physical Electronics, Lecture 23. The MOSFET Square Law Model

Computational Study of the Electronic Performance of Cross-Plane Superlattice Peltier Devices

Non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) simulation of metallic carbon nanotubes including vacancy defects

Review of Optical Properties of Materials

ECE 442. Spring, Lecture -2

III-V CMOS: What have we learned from HEMTs? J. A. del Alamo, D.-H. Kim 1, T.-W. Kim, D. Jin, and D. A. Antoniadis

Application II: The Ballistic Field-E ect Transistor

Lecture 1 - Electrons, Photons and Phonons. September 4, 2002

Evaluation of Electronic Characteristics of Double Gate Graphene Nanoribbon Field Effect Transistor for Wide Range of Temperatures

Quantum Modeling of Thermoelectric Properties of Si/Ge/Si Superlattices

Dissipative Quantum Transport Using the Pauli Master Equation

Quantum Phenomena & Nanotechnology (4B5)

Theory of Electrical Characterization of Semiconductors

Analytical modelling and performance analysis of Double-Gate MOSFET-based circuit including ballistic/quasi-ballistic effects

Lecture 9 - Carrier Drift and Diffusion (cont.), Carrier Flow. September 24, 2001

Lecture 4: Solution of Schrodinger Equation

Transcription:

ECE-656: Fall 2011 Lecture 35: Introduction to Quantum Transport in Devices Mark Lundstrom Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA 1 11/21/11 objectives 1) Provide an introduction to the most commonly-used approach for simulating quantum transport (the nonequilibrium Green s function (NEGF) approach) and discuss the interpretation of NEGF simulations. 2) In the process, discuss how quantum effects influence the performance of nanoscale MOSFETs. (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) 2

for more information 1) View an online short course on nanoscale MOSFETs (especially Lecture 6) at http:// nanohub.org/resources/5306 2) Consult the NEGF Resource page at http:// nanohub.org/topics/negf 3 outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 4

model SOI device sketch of IBM structure simulation domain L G = 40 nm L G = 40 nm and larger T CH = 8.6 nm Si T INS = 1.1 nm SiON V DD = 1 V A. Majumdar et al., IEEE TED, 56, pp 2270, 2009 (The ETSOI Devices studied here were provided by IBM Research) (Measured at Purdue Univ. by Himadri Pal.) 5 semiclassical vs. quantum d ( k ) = qe dt r ( t) = r ( t 0 ) + υ ( t ) t d t t 0 υ ( t) = 1 de dk k = k ( t ) Must treat electrons as waves when the potential energy (bottom of the conduction band) varies rapidly on the scale of the electron s wavelength. ΔpΔx Uncertainty principle 6

quantum confinement gate ψ ~ e ±ikx p = k = 2π λ S T Si D E = p2 2m * gate E = λ B = p2 2m = 3 * 2 k BT 10 nm 3m * k B T (Si) 7 quantum confinement 2 d 2 ψ 2m * dx + E 2 C (x)ψ = Eψ Hψ = Eψ Eigenvalue problem ε n = 2 n 2 π 2 2m * T Si 2 n = 1,2, 3... energy --> E F ε 1 E C = 0 ψ = 0 ψ = 0 ε 2 0 T Si z 8

quantum effects on MOSFETs Quantum mechanics: 1) increases V T 2) decreases the gate cap 3) affects transport along the channel (D. Esseni et al. IEDM 2000 and TED 2001) 9 the MOSFET: an open quantum system source 1e ik 1 x re!ik 1 x SOURCE channel E C (x)! "qv (x) drain DRAIN te ik2x 0 L x 10

outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 11 f the BTE f t + f r υ qe p f = df dt coll ( r, k,t ) a number between zero and 1 r f υ q E p f = 0 equilibrium or ballistic Boundary conditions: Deep source and drain are assumed to be in thermodynamic equilibrium with well-defined but separate Fermi levels (E F1 and E F2 ). f ( r, k ) = 1 1+ e = 1 (E E F )/k B T 1+ e (E C r ( )+E( k ) E F )/k B T? 12

semiclassical transport E E(k) unchanged from bulk Si with a constant potential. E F1 Energy k E F2 E C (x) x 0 x Bottom of E(k) moves up and down with the spatially varying E C (x) 13 filling states in ballistic transport E E F1 E TOP Energy k EF2 E C (x) x 0 x 14

solving the ballistic BTE E V GS =V DS = 0.6 V E F1 E TOP Energy x 0 n(x 0 ) = LDOS 1 (E,x 0 ) f 0 k E F2 ε(x) x ( E F1 ) + LDOS 2 (E, x 0 ) f 0 E F 2 ( ) de J-H Rhew, Z. Ren, and M.S. Lundstrom, Solid-State Electron. 46, 1800, 2002 15 LDOS(E, x) 16

n(e, x) Electrons injected from source Electrons injected from drain All injected electrons 17 I(E, x) 18

outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 19 objectives To: Illustrate the NEGF approach to quantum transport in nanoscale MOSFETs Not To: Derive the NEGF equations Discuss implementation and numerical issues Discuss nanoscale MOSFET device physics 20

solving the Schrödinger equation 2 d 2 ψ 2m * dx + E 2 C (x)ψ = Eψ [ H ]ψ = Eψ Energy ε 3 ε 2 ε 1 Schred nanohub.org E C (x) ψ 1 = 0 ψ 1 ψ 2 ψ 3 ψ ψ = 0 N N 1 2 3 4 a (N-1) N x finite differences 21 Schred results: wide Q well E F Wide quantum well dense energy levels and surface inversion 22

open quantum systems: source injection contact 1 1e ik 1x re k 1x device contact 2 te ik 2 x SOURCE ψ 1 0 E C ( x) qv ( x) DRAIN well-defined E(k) 0 no E(k) ψ N 0 L x well-defined E(k) 23 formal solution: solving the wave equation [H ]{ψ } = E[I]{ψ } ( E[I] [H ]){ψ } = 0 ( E[I] [H ] [Σ 1 ] [Σ 2 ]){ψ } = {S} (not an eigenvalue problem - energy is continuous) {ψ } = [ G]{S} [ G(E) ] = E I Σ 1, Σ 2 self energies ( [ ] [ H ] [ Σ 1 ] [ Σ 2 ]) 1 (N x N retarded Green s function) 24

finding n(x) from ψ(x) the device is attached to a bulk contact.. contact device f 1 ( E) ψ k1 = 1 L eik 1x E( k 1 ) L x n 1 (x) = k 1 >0 ψ k1 (x) k of injected electron computed wave function within device 2 f1 ( E) absorbing contact Fermi function of contact 25 finding n(x) from ψ(x) n 1 (x i ) = 1 L k 1 >0 ψ k1 (x i ) 2 f1 ( E) 1 dk n 1 (x i ) = 1 π de ψ k 1 (x i ) 2 f ( E)dE 1 = LDOS 1 x i, E 0 0 ( ) f 1 E ( )de g 1D ( E) = 2 dk 1 π de just like the semi-classical ballistic case! Repeat for contact 2 and add the results.. ( ) f 1 E n(x i ) = LDOS 1 x i,e ( )de + LDOS 2 x i,e 0 0 ( ) f 2 E ( )de 26

recap energy E C (x) 1) Guess E C (x) 2) For each energy: ( E[I] [H ] [Σ]){ψ } = {S} 3) Determine n (x): n(x i ) = n 1 (x i ) + n 2 (x i ) 4) solve Poisson for E C (x) position independent energy channels (ballistic) 5) Determine I D I ( E) = 2q ( ) h T (E) f f 1 2 I D = I ( E) de 27 LDOS (x, E) LDOS from source LDOS from drain Total LDOS 28

n(x, E) Electrons injected from source Electrons injected from drain All injected electrons 29 I(x, E) 30

outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 31 filling states in ballistic transport Σ 1 Σ 2 state at energy, E position, x ( ) f 1 E n(x i ) = LDOS 1 x i, E ( )de + LDOS 2 x i,e 0 0 ( ) f 2 E ( )de 32

filling states in ballistic transport [G n (E)] = GΣ in G Σ in (E) = Γ 1 (E) f 1 (E) + Γ 2 (E) f 2 (E) in-scattering function connection to source population of source 33 scattering in- scattering state at energy, E position, x Σ 1 Σ 2 out- scattering [ G(E) ] = [ E[I] [H ] [Σ 1 ] [Σ 2 ] [Σ S ]] 1 [G n (x,e)] = G Σ in 1 + Σ in in ( 2 + Σ S )G + 34

in-scattering function in-scattering from contact 1 G n [ ] Σ 1 in E ( x,e) = G G + in Σ 1 = [ Γ 1 ] f 1 strength of connection to source population of source 35 in-scattering function (phonons) in-scattering from another state G n [ ] Σ S in E ( x,e) = G G + in Σ S ~ [ D] [ G n ] strength of connection to phonons population of source 36

phonon in-scattering E + ω phonon emission phonon absorption E E ω Σ S in ( E) D 0 ( N ω +1)G n E + ω ( ) + D 0 N ω G n ( E ω ) (emission) (absorption) Note: in Σ S depends on G n 37 solution procedure 1) Solve: [ G(E, x) ] = [ E[I] [H ] [Σ 1 ] [Σ 2 ] [Σ S ]] 1 2) Compute: [G n (x,e)] = G in [ ] Σ 1 [ G] + in + [ G] Σ 2 in + [ G] Σ S [ G] + [ G] + 3) Solve Poisson s equation depends on [G n ] solve by iteration! 38

current I(E) T ( E) ( f 1 f 2 ) I(E) = Trace ([ Σ in ][ A] ) Trace Γ S ([ ] G ) n 39 4000 IV comparison I ds vs. V ds, V g = 0.55V, V back = 0V ETSOI (semiclassical - ballistic) I ds (ua/um) 3000 2000 1000 ETSOI (quantum ballistic) ETSOI (quantum with phonon / SR scattering) ETSOI (measured) 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 V ds (V) 40

internal quantities Electron velocity (cm/s) 10 x Electron velocity 107 0 5 0 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 Transport direction (nm) 1 First conduction band (ev) ETSOI (semiclassical - ballistic) ETSOI (quantum ballistic) ETSOI (quantum with SRS and phonon scattering) 41 LDOS (x, E) LDOS from source LDOS from drain Total LDOS 42

n(x, E) Electrons injected from source Electrons injected from drain All injected electrons 43 I(x, E) RIGHT going current LEFT going current 44

outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 45 quantum vs. semi-classical transport 1) Boltzmann Transport Equation ( ) f r,k In equilibrium, this is the Fermi function. 6D, 3 in position and 3 in momentum space 2) Non-equilibrium Green s function formalism ( ) G r, r,e 7D because E is an independent variable. Energy channels are coupled for dissipative scattering. 46

why is quantum transport important? 4) 3) 2) 1) 47 from M. Luisier, ETH Zurich / Purdue outline 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary (Thanks to Xufeng Wang for help in preparing this lecture.) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ 48

summary 1) For ballistic transport, the NEGF approach is identical to solving the Schrödinger equation with open boundary conditions. 2) The local density of states divides into parts fillable by each contact. 3) Conceptually, scattering processes are like contacts. 4) NEGF provides a rigorous prescription for including scattering. 5) NEGF is limited by a single particle, mean-field assumption. 6) A basic familiarity with quantum transport should be part of every device engineer s training. 49 questions 1) Introduction 2) Semiclassical ballistic transport 3) Quantum ballistic transport 4) Carrier scattering in quantum transport 5) Discussion 6) Summary 50