The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System

Similar documents
Simulation of the ILC Collimation System using BDSIM, MARS15 and STRUCT

A Study of RHIC Crystal Collimation

Beam losses far downstream of the high luminosity interaction points of LHC - intermediate results

LHC Collimation and Loss Locations

Beam-induced radiation in the compact muon solenoid tracker at the Large Hadron Collider

Status of the LHC Beam Cleaning Study Group

Beam losses versus BLM locations at the LHC

Merlin scattering models for the HL-LHC collimation system

Simulations of HL halo loss and IR losses. R. Bruce, F. Cerutti, R. de Maria, A. Marsili, S. Redaelli

Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7

Higgs Factory Magnet Protection and Machine-Detector Interface

The LHC: the energy, cooling, and operation. Susmita Jyotishmati

LHC APERTURE AND COMMISSIONING OF THE COLLIMATION SYSTEM

AFP - TCL collimator studies

Sources of machine-induced background in the ATLAS and CMS detectors at the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

1.1 Machine-Detector Interface

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Beam Cleaning and Collimation Systems

Practical Lattice Design

2008 JINST 3 S Main machine layout and performance. Chapter Performance goals

OBTAINING SLOW BEAM SPILLS AT THE SSC COLLIDER D. Ritson Stanford Linear Accelerator Stanford, CA 94309

D. Trbojevic, A.J. Stevens, M.A. Harrison, E Dell, and S. Peggs Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA

ASPECTS OF MACHINE INDUCED BACKGROUND IN THE LHC EXPERIMENTS

HE-LHC Optics Development

Studies of Nanotube Channeling for. Efficient Beam Scraping at Accelerators

Colliders and the Machine Detector Interface

SPPC Study and R&D Planning. Jingyu Tang for the SPPC study group IAS Program for High Energy Physics January 18-21, 2016, HKUST

Simulations and measurements of collimation cleaning with 100MJ beams in the LHC

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC

1. Introduction. LHC Project Note 213. Computer simulation of Beam Loss Detection in the Arcs of the LHC

Preliminary Design of m + m - Higgs Factory Machine-Detector Interface

Particle Accelerators: Transverse Beam Dynamics

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Accelerators. Lecture V. Oliver Brüning. school/lecture5

Status of Optics Design

Aperture Measurements and Implications

LHC Commissioning in 2008

Theory English (Official)

F. Zimmermann and M.-P. Zorzano, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

PROTECTION MEASURES FOR SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET UNITS OF THE UNK AGAINST RADIATION

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Beam loss background and collimator design in CEPC double ring scheme

SC magnets for Future HEHIHB Colliders

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Interface with Experimental Detector in the High Luminosity Run

JLEIC forward detector design and performance

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED SCALING FFAG ACCELERATOR

Transverse beam stability and Landau damping in hadron colliders

ELIC: A High Luminosity And Efficient Spin Manipulation Electron-Light Ion Collider Based At CEBAF

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Collimation method studies for next-generation hadron colliders

XIth International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering Château de Blois, France, May 15-20, 2005 arxiv:hep-ex/ v1 31 Oct 2005

LHC Upgrade Plan and Ideas - scenarios & constraints from the machine side

Operational Experience with HERA

Introduction to particle accelerators

MACHINE PROTECTION ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR THE LHC

The LHC. Part 1. Corsi di Dottorato Corso di Fisica delle Alte Energie Maggio 2014 Per Grafstrom CERN and University of Bologna

Longitudinal Dynamics

WHAT CAN THE SSC AND THE VLHC STUDIES TELL US FOR THE HE-LHC?

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report SIMULATION MODELS FOR ENERGY DEPOSITION

Tevatron Beam-Beam Phenomena and Counter-Measures

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 24 Sep 2012 Abstract

Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

Commissioning of the LHC collimation system S. Redaelli, R. Assmann, C. Bracco, M. Jonker and G. Robert-Demolaize CERN, AB department

LHC operation in 2015 and prospects for the future

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

FY04 Luminosity Plan. SAG Meeting September 22, 2003 Dave McGinnis

ACCELERATOR PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE LHC

Status and Results of the UA9 Crystal Collimation Experiment at the CERN-SPS

EuCARD-2 Enhanced European Coordination for Accelerator Research & Development. Conference/Workshop Paper

LER Beam-Beam Collimation. Studies Using TURTLE

LCLS-II Beam Stay-Clear

MDI and detector modeling

SIMULATION STUDY FOR MEIC ELECTRON COOLING*

Interaction Regions with Increased Low-Betas. for a 2-TeV Muon Collider. Carol Johnstone, King-Yuen Ng

BEAM-INDUCED DAMAGE TO THE TEVATRON COMPONENTS AND WHAT HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT IT

Comparison between simulated and observed LHC beam backgrounds in the ATLAS experiment at E beam. =4 TeV

Betatron Matching and Dispersion Matching

HiLumi LHC FP7 High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Design Study. Deliverable Report. Conceptual Design of IR Collimation

US LHC Accelerator Research Program BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC Hollow e-beam Lens for LHC Scraping

US LHC Accelerator Research Program BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC Hollow e-beam Lens for LHC Scraping

Non-collision Background Monitoring Using the Semi-Conductor Tracker of ATLAS at LHC

Injection: Hadron Beams

Monochromatization Option for NLC Collisions

A Luminosity Leveling Method for LHC Luminosity Upgrade using an Early Separation Scheme

The Large Hadron Collider Lyndon Evans CERN

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

Beam Loss Monitors, Specification

R&D ON FUTURE CIRCULAR COLLIDERS

Status of the TESLA Beam Delivery System Lattice Design. Deepa Angal-Kalinin Daresbury Laboratory, UK

Progress on the Large Hadron electron Collider. O. Brüning, E. Nissen, D. Pellegrini, D. Schulte, A. Valloni, F. Zimmermann 1

+.V) eo(o) -2 so - sx. hngc)90w3-- Beam-beam collisions and crossing angles in RHIC*

Transcription:

The Very Large Hadron Collider Beam Collimation System A.I. Drozhdin, N.V. Mokhov, A.A. Sery, Fermilab, P.O. Box 5, Batavia, IL 65 USA INTRODUCTIONS Even in good operational conditions, a finite fraction of the beam will leave the stable central area of accelerator because of beam-gas interactions everywhere along the accelerator, intra-beam scattering, collisions in the IPs, RF noise, ground motion and resonances excited by the accelerator imperfections producing a beam halo. As a result of beam halo interactions with limiting aperture, hadronic and electromagnetic showers are induced in accelerator and detector components causing accelerator related background in the detectors, magnets heating and accelerator and environment irradiation. A beam collimation system is used for the beam halo interception in a specially equipped warm part of accelerator. A multi-turn particle tracking through the accelerator and beam halo interactions with the s are done with STRUCT [] code. All lattice components with their strength and aperture restrictionsare taken intoaccount during these calculations. Particles lost in the accelerator are stored in the files for the next step of calculations using MARS [2]code. (((Full scale Monte-Carlo hadronic and electromagnetic shower simulations, secondary particles transport in the accelerator and detector components, includingshieldingwith real materials and magnetic fields are done with MARS.))) 2 RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS A main purpose of the VLHC beam cleaning system is to reduce accelerator related backgrounds in the detector and to decrease beam loss rates in superconducting magnets. We assumed that the beam intensity at the beginning of collisionsis 2 4 ppp [3], and the run duration is hours. If intensity drops during the run by % because of elastic interactions in the IP, ground motion and resonances, this amounts the rate of particle loss in the collimation system of 6 8 p/s. The total power of beam loss is 4.5 kw. A r.m.s. normalized emittance of the beam is assumed to be.3 mm mrad [3]. We assumed also beam pipe aperture in the utility section of R=2 mm, and in the low-β IP and accelerator arc of R=8 mm. A two-stage [4] beam collimation system is designed for the VLHC to localize most of losses in the utility straight section [5] specially designed to match the requirements of beam collimation and abort systems. Maximum of dispersion in the accelerator arc is equal to 3.32m, and zero in the interaction region (IR). β-functions in the VLHC low-β IR Work supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC2-76CH3 and arc lattice are shown in Figures and 2 for collision optics. The collimation system consists of horizontal and vertical primary s and a set of secondary s placed at an optimal phase advance, to intercept most of particles outscattered from the primary s during the first turn after particle interaction with primary. Particle impact parameter on a primary is of the order of µm [6]. A thin primary increases proton amplitude as a result of multiple Coulomb scattering and thus effects in drastic increase of particle impact parameter on the downstream secondary s. This results in a significant reduction of the outscattered proton yield and total beam loss in the accelerator, decreases jaws overheating and mitigates requirements to s alignment. Beta functions, m Dispersion, m 5 horizontal 45 vertical 4 35 3 25 2 5 5 5 5 2 25 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 5 5 2 25 5 5 2 25 Figure : Beta functions and dispersion in the VLHC arc. Collimation system location in the utility section is shown in Figure 3. KM, LAMB and SM are kicker, Lambertson and septum magnets of the beam abort system not described here. A primary horizontal PriHp located in the beginning of utility section in the large dispersion region is used for positive sign off-momentum particles collimation. Particles scattered by the primary are intercepted by the secondary s SHp3 and SHp33 located in 7 o and 35 o phase advance downstream of the primary. Proton transverse populations in the primary and secondary s are shown in Figure 4. In our

8 7 horizontal vertical 2 horizontal vertical 6 Beta functions, m 5 4 3 Beta functions, m 8 6 4 2 2 248 25 252 254 256 258 26 262 5 55 52 525 53 248 25 252 254 256 258 26 262 Figure 2: Beta functions in the IR. Dispersion, m 4 3 2 - -2-3 -4-5 5 55 52 525 53 simulations particles first time interact primary with a small (about 3µm) impact parameter. As a result of multiple Coulomb scattering in the primary, the impact parameter at the secondary s, increases to about.mm (Figure 5). A primary horizontal PriHm located in the center of utility section in the high dispersion region is used for negative sign off-momentum protons collimation. Collimators SHm3 located in 8 o, and SHp33 located in 65 o behind the primary are used as a secondary s. Unfortunately secondary SHp33 must be located from both sides of the beam to intercept both positive and negative signs off-momentum particles. This is the only place with aperture restrictions from both sides of the circulating beam. Proton transverse populations in these s are shown in Figure 6. Primary momentum s PriHp and PriHm placed at σ x intercept protons with momentum deviations bigger than ±3 4. A primary horizontal PriH located in the large β-function and zero dispersion region is used for large amplitude particles collimation. Collimators SH3 located in 9 o, and SH5 located in 7 o behind the primary are used as a secondary s. Proton transverse populations in these s are shown in Figure 7. Vertical primary PriV and secondary s SV3 (phase 8 o ) and SV5 (phase 37 o ) are used for halo collimation in the vertical plane (Figure 8). After the first interaction with primary high amplitude particles are intercepted by the secondary s, but large number of particles survive, and will interact with primary again. Average number of particle interactions is equal to.4 if primary s are placed at σ and secondary at 2 σ. Particles with amplitudes smaller than 2σ are not intercepted by the secondary s, and survive during several tens turns until they increase amplitude at the next interactions with primary. These particles occupy region inside the 2σ envelope. Although primary s are placed at σ and sec- PriHp SHp3 PriV SV3 PriH SH3 PriHm SHm3 SH5 SV5, SHp33 5 55 52 525 53 Figure 3: Beta functions and dispersion in the collimation system location. ondary s are at 2σ from the beam axis, the tail of halo is extended behind 2σ. Halo particles population and amplitude distribution in the accelerator aperture are shown in Figure 9 for collimation of equilibrium particles, and in Figure for off-momentum particles with dp/p = ± 4. Large amplitude particles, which escape from the cleaning system at the first turn, are able to circulate in the machine, before being captured by the s on the later turns. This defines the machine geometric aperture. Beam loss distribution in the VLHC with primary s at σ and secondary s at 2σ is presented in Figures (top). We assumed that 25% of halo interact first with each of four primary s. As is seen from Figures 4 -, particles amplitude growth at interaction with mm tungsten primary is pretty large compared to the beam size and is comparable to the accelerator aperture (3σ), that causes particle loss in the IR quads. Our studies show that in the VLHC, a 5mm thick tungsten primary positioned at 5σ from the beam axis in vertical or horizontal planes would function as an optimal primary. At 5 TeV, an optimal length of copper secondary equals 3 m. Collimators jaw is positioned at 6.2σ from the beam center in horizontal or vertical plane. To decrease outscattered particles flux from the secondary s they are aligned parallel to the circulating beam envelope. The beam collimation utility section is designed using normalconducting magnets. The beam loss in the utility section amounts 24 W/m, which is not a big problem for normalconducting elements. The maximum beam loss in the superconducting part of accelerator occurs in KM LAMB SM

.2.5..5 -.5 -. -.5 "PriHp.dat" using 4:5 "PriHp.dat" using 4:5 dn/dx 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 5 5 "SHp_gist.dat" -.2 - -.5.5.75.8.85.9.95.5. "SHp3.dat" using 4:5 "SHp3.dat" using 4:5 "SHp3.dat" using 4:5 "SHp3_col.dat".8.6.4 "SHp_PAR.datNEW" using 5:7.5.2 -.2 -.5 -.4 -. -.5 -.5 - -.5.5.5 -.6 -.8.75.8.85.9.95.2.5. "SHp33.dat" using 4:5 "SHp33.dat" using 4:5 "SHp33.dat" using 4:5 "SHp33_col.dat" Figure 5: Proton transverse populationin the secondary SHp3..5 -.5 -. -.5.5 Figure 4: Horizontal halo population at the primary PriHp exit (top), in the secondary SHp3 (middle), and in the secondary SHp33 (bottom). Ellipse represents σ envelope on the phase plane. Black crosses represent particles at the first turn after interaction with the primary (without secondary s). the 6 m long quadrupoles in the IP. The main reason is that the β function reaches its maximum in the final focus quadrupoles. This maximum is equal to 3.24 W/m or 4.6 5 p/(m sec) for primary s at σ and secondary s at 2σ, and.24 W/m or.55 5 p/(m sec) for primary s at 5σ and secondary s at 6.2σ. As a reference we can consider the LHC admissible limits for superconducting magnets, which is equal to 7 6 p/(m sec) [8] for 7TeV and scale it by a ratio of accelerators energy (5/7=7). The VLHC collimation system permits to decrease losses in the superconducting magnets to a level which is two times below the admissible limit even if s are at σ and 2σ. Two more supplementary s are placed in the IR in the distance of 27m upstream and downstream of quadrupoles to decrease particle losses in the lowβ quadrupoles. They are located at σ x,y to intercept only particles outscattered from the secondary s. Phase advance between the supplementary and low-β quadrupoles is small, that permits to keep quadrupoles in a shadow of supplementary s. This eliminates primary particle flux in the IP quads with primary s at 5σ, secondary s at 6.2σ and supplementary s at σ, and decreases flux by two order of magnitude to a level of.33 W/m or 4.2 3 p/(m sec) with primary s at σ and supplementary s at 3σ. Beam loss distribution in the VLHC with primary s at 5σ, secondary s at 6.2σ and supplementary s at σ is presented in Figures (bottom). The most irradiated superconducting magnet with supplementary s is one of the first 29 m long magnets and 5 m long quadrupole behind the collimation system. Beam loss rate in this magnet is equal to.22 W/m (2.75 3 p/(m sec)), in the quadrupole -.89 W/m (. 4 p/(m sec)) with primary s at 5σ,what is two order of magnitude below the admissible limit. A beam loss analysis has shown that the accelerator related background in the detector is originated by particle loss in the inner triplet region. There are two possible points of particle loss in this region - supplementary and low-β quadrupoles if supplementary is not used. Particle loss rate in the supplementary is two times higher compared to loss in the quadrupoles (See Figures 3), but is located in sufficiently larger distance from the detector (358 m from the IP). Beam loss rate from one beam in the supplementary is equal to.36 7 p/sec. Rate in the low-β quadrupoles without supplementary from one side of IP is equal to 5.63 6 p/sec (incoming beam) and 3.43 6 p/sec from other side (outgoing beam) for primary s at 5σ. 3 CONCLUSIONS The utility straight section is designed to match the requirements of beam collimation and abort systems. A twostage beam collimation system consists of 5mm thick primary tungsten s placed at 5σ x,y,and3m long

.2.5 "PriHo.dat" using 4:5 "PriHo.dat" using 4:5.2.5 "PriHo.dat" using 4:5 "PriHo.dat" using 4:5...5 -.5.5 -.5 -. -. -.5 -.5 -.2 -.5 - -.5.5.5 -.2 -.5 - -.5.5.5.2.5 "SHm3.dat" using 4:5 "SHm3.dat" using 4:5 "SHm3.dat" using 4:5 "SHm3_col.dat".2.5 "SH3.dat" using 4:5 "SH3.dat" using 5:6 "SH3.dat" using 5:6 "SH3_col.dat"..5..5 -.5 -.5 -. - -.5.5.5 -. -.5 - -.5.5.2.5 "SHm5.dat" using 4:5 "SHm5.dat" using 4:5 "SHm5.dat" using 4:5 "SHm5_col.dat".2.5 "SH5.dat" using 4:5 "SH5.dat" using 4:5 "SH5.dat" using 4:5 "SH5_col.dat"...5.5 -.5 -.5 -. - -.5.5 -. -.5.5 Figure 6: Horizontal halo population at the primary PriHm exit (top), in the secondary SHm3 (middle), and in the secondary SHp33 (bottom). copper secondary s located in an optimal phase advance at 6.2σ x,y and aligned parallel to the circulating beam envelope. Two more supplementary s are placed in the IR in a distance of 27m upstream and downstream of quadrupoles to decrease particle losses in the lowβ quadrupoles. They are located at σ x,y to intercept only particles outscattered from the secondary s. The effect of beam cleaning system operation on the particle loss distribution in the entire machine is calculated with emphasis on high luminosity insertions and the detector backgrounds. The maximum beam loss in the superconducting part of accelerator occurs in the first magnets behind the collimation system. The maximum beam loss rate in this magnet is equal to.89 W/m or. 4 p/(m sec) with primary s at 5σ, what is two order of magnitude below the admissible limit. The low-β quadrupoles heating from the beam cleaning adds smaller than % to the total heat load determined mostly by the pp collisions in the IP. Beam loss rate from one beam in the supplementary located in 358 m from the IP is equal to.36 7 p/sec, and there is no primary particle loss in the lowβ quadrupoles with supplementary s in the IR at σ x,y. Figure 7: Horizontal halo population at the primary PriH exit (top), in the secondary SH3 (middle), and in the secondary SH5 (bottom). 4 REFERENCES [] I. Baishev, A. Drozhdin, and N. Mokhov, STRUCT Program User s Reference Manual, SSCL MAN 34 (994). [2] N. V. Mokhov, The MARS Code System User s Guide, Version 3(95), Fermilab FN 628 (995). [3] Very Large Hadron Collider, Information Packet, Fermilab, January 998. [4] T. Trenkler and J.B. Jeanneret, The Principles of Two Stage Betatron and Momentum Collimatin in Circular Accelerators, CERN SL/95-3 (AP), LHC Note 32. [5] A.A. Sery.??????????, Workshop on VLHC, Fontana, Wisconsin, February 22-25, 999. [6] M. Sidel, Determination of Diffusion Rates in the Proton Beam Halo of HERA, DESY-HERA 93-4 (993). [7] J.M. Butler, D.S. Denisov, H.T. Diehl, A.I. Drozhdin, N.V. Mokhov, D.R. Wood, Reduction of TEVATRON and Main Ring Induced Backgrounds in the DØ Detector, Fermilab-FN-629 (995). [8] The Large Hadron Collider, Conceptual Design, CERN/AC/95-5(LHC) October 2, 995.

Y, mrad Y, mrad.2.5..5 -.5 -. -.5 "PriVo.dat" using 6:7 "PriVo.dat" using 6:7 -.2 -.5 - -.5.5.5.5..5 -.5 "SV3.dat" using 6:7 "SV3.dat" using 6:7 "SV3.dat" using 6:7 "SV3_col.dat" Vertical amplitude, sigma dn/dax 3 "phase." using 3:4.4 7.8 5.2 2.6 2.6 5.2 7.8.4 3 5.6 35 "SHp3_ampldp.dat" 3 25 2 5 -. -2 -.5 - -.5.5.5 2 2.5.5. "SV5.dat" using 6:7 "SV5.dat" using 6:7 "SV5.dat" using 6:7 "SV5_col.dat" 5 5 7.5 2.5 5 Y, mrad.5 Figure : Halo particles population and amplitude distribution in the VLHC aperture at collimation of offmomentum protons with dp/p = ±.. -.5 -. -.5 - -.5.5 Figure 8: Vertical halo population at the primary PriV exit (top), in the secondary SV3 (middle), and in the secondary SV5 (bottom). 9. 7.8 "phase." using 3:4 "LOSELE.DAT_PriSUM.".... 2 4 6 8 Vertical amplitude, sigma 6.5 5.2 3.9 2.6.3. "LOSELE.DAT_PriSUM.5_sig" 35 7.8.4 3 5.6 8.2 "SHp3_ampl.dat"... 2 4 6 8 3 25 IP collimation IP dn/dax 2 5 2 4 6 8 5 7.5 2.5 5 7.5 Figure 9: Halo particles population and amplitude distribution in the VLHC aperture at collimation of protons with equilibrium momentum. Figure : Beam loss distribution along the accelerator at beam collimation with primary s at σ and secondary s at 2σ (top), and with primary s at 5σ, secondary s at 6.2σ and supplementary s at σ (bottom).

"LOSELE.DAT_PriSUM.5_sig".... 5 55 52 525 53 PriHp SHp3 PriV SV3 SHm3 SH5 SV5, SHp33 PriH LAMB SM SH3 PriHm KM 5 55 52 525 53 Figure 2: Beam loss distributions in the utility section at beam collimation with primary s at 5σ and secondary s at 6.2σ. "LOSELE.DAT_PriSUM.5".... 78 782 784 786 788 79 792 794 "LOSELE.DAT_PriSUM.5_sig"... 78 782 784 786 788 79 792 794 IP 78 782 784 786 788 79 792 794 Figure 3: Beam loss distributions in the IR at proton beam collimation without (top) and with supplementary s in IR at σ (bottom).