King City URA 6D Concept Plan

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

King City s Evolution Among the fastest growing cities 2000 Census 1,949 2010 Census 3,111 60% increase 2016 Census estimate 3,817 23% increase Average annual rate 4.3% Surpassing population forecasts Among the most densely developed King City: 2010 Census 2,667 units / sq. mile Beaverton 2581 units / sq. mile Portland 1,990 units / sq. mile Tigard -1,970 units / sq. mile

King City s Evolution More diverse population Median age 76 to 58 yrs. (2000 to 2015) Non-white 1.7% to 11% (2000 to 2010)

King City s Evolution Growth-related Change Virtually no developable land 2018 Housing Needs Analysis land availability: 2.3 ac. Commercial 1.5 ac. Residential Can accommodate only 4% of forecast demand Deficit of 980 units Redevelopment potential is limited Built since mid-60s Small lots Vacancy rates well below region & state

Regional Context Logical UGB Expansion Existing urban areas to east & north Tualatin R. floodplain south Roy Rogers Rd. / EFU west Consistent with Metro direction Coordinated with Tigard & Beaverton expansion

Snapshot 528 ac. / 318 ac. developable 3,500± units proposed 12+ du / ac. average density

Frameworks Natural Resources Land Use Mobility Shaped other frameworks Protection & enhancement Compatibility with existing development Range of housing types Interconnected Active transportation priority Infrastructure Cost-effective Equitable financing responsibilities

Tualatin R. floodplain Riparian corridors Natural Resources Associated upland wildlife habitat Shaped plan concepts

Land Use - 4 Neighborhoods Main Street / Town Center Beef Bend Neighborhood Central Neighborhood Rural Character Neighborhood

Main Street / Town Center Mixed-use & highest density 3-5 stories Single story retail & restaurant Civic uses library, city hall or school Campus-style employment or institutional uses Pedestrian-friendly / transit ready

Beef Bend Neighborhood Attached / detached residences Potential neighborhood commercial Connected neighborhoods Beef Bend as green boulevard with multi-use path Parks & natural areas

Central Neighborhood Residential character Primarily attached / detached single family Connected neighborhoods Parks & natural areas Natural areas on the edge

Rural Neighborhood Low density rural character Modest redevelopment Minimize paved areas Shared streets Lower volume traffic Natural areas on the edge and within neighborhoods

Development Summary Dwelling Unit Type Main Street / Town Center Beef Bend Central Neighborhood Low-Mod Totals Multifamily Single Family Attached Single Family Detached 1000 222 0 0 1222 500 0 60 0 560 620 444 498 232 1794 Totals 2120 666 558 232 3576

Affordable Housing Historically King City has a wide range of permitted housing types including manufactured homes, apartments, and condos. 1 parking space / residence consistent with Metro guidance ADUs allowed Concept Plan Promotes a wide range of housing types

Parks and Open Space Interconnected system Neighborhood-oriented Connected with trails & natural areas Potential joint location with school

Internal connectivity URA 6D Concept Plan Multi-modal circulation Mobility Connected with trails & natural areas Encourage active transportation Limit reliance on nearby arterial streets

Capacity available System improvements for service Additional reservoir capacity 410 ft. pressure zone Continued coordination with Tigard Water URA 6D Concept Plan Infrastructure - Water

Infrastructure - Sanitary Proposed CWS pump station Roy Rogers Rd Option 1: gravity trunk service Option 2: subdistrict pump stations Further evaluation during master plan

Infrastructure - Stormwater Will utilize existing drainage pattern Water quality facilities meeting CWS standards Variety of large / small scale options Remediation opportunities to address current stormwater issues

Financing 4 Funding Categories: Local developer Sub-district multiple developers District shared infrastructure cost for all development in URA Major Off-site shared infrastructure cost for URA & surrounding areas

INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENSES

INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK COSTS

INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE

Next Steps Master Plan Continued stakeholder & agency involvement Refine land use Affordable housing strategy Update transportation/infrastructure analysis Plan & Ordinance Amendments Comprehensive Plan Community Development Code Financing Mechanisms

QUESTIONS