Characters in Categorical Representation Theory

Similar documents
APPENDIX TO [BFN]: MORITA EQUIVALENCE FOR CONVOLUTION CATEGORIES

Loop Groups, Characters and Elliptic Curves

BEILINSON-BERNSTEIN LOCALIZATION OVER THE HARISH-CHANDRA CENTER

On the geometric Langlands duality

Tilting exotic sheaves, parity sheaves on affine Grassmannians, and the Mirković Vilonen conjecture

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

DERIVED HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY. 1. Integrable Systems

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

Contributors. Preface

The derived category of a GIT quotient

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

MASTERCLASS MARCH 2013 BY Ben Elias, MIT, Boston and Geordie Williamson, MPI, Bonn Titel: Soergel bimodules & Kazhdan-Lusztig conjectures

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

NOTES ON PROCESI BUNDLES AND THE SYMPLECTIC MCKAY EQUIVALENCE

Derived Morita theory and Hochschild Homology and Cohomology of DG Categories

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

GEOMETRIC FUNCTION THEORY

SUMMER SCHOOL ON DERIVED CATEGORIES NANTES, JUNE 23-27, 2014

Representations Are Everywhere

Vertex algebras, chiral algebras, and factorisation algebras

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

CHARACTER SHEAVES ON UNIPOTENT GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC p > 0. Mitya Boyarchenko Vladimir Drinfeld. University of Chicago

IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I

A partition of the set of enhanced Langlands parameters of a reductive p-adic group

C*-Algebras and Group Representations

Braid group actions on categories of coherent sheaves

RESEARCH STATEMENT. Contents

BIRTHING OPERS SAM RASKIN

A miniconference dedicated to A. Vaintrob s 60th birthday. Schedule

WORKING SEMINAR SHEAVES IN REPRESENTATION THEORY

Noncommutative counterparts of the Springer resolution

Hochschild homology and Grothendieck Duality

VERLINDE ALGEBRA LEE COHN. Contents

INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS AND DRINFELD CENTERS IN DERIVED ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Galois to Automorphic in Geometric Langlands

JOHN FRANCIS. 1. Motivation

CHARACTER SHEAVES, TENSOR CATEGORIES AND NON-ABELIAN FOURIER TRANSFORM

A p-adic GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 1

Quaternionic Complexes

370 INDEX AND NOTATION

Introduction to Chiral Algebras

Matrix factorizations over projective schemes

arxiv: v3 [math.ag] 30 Oct 2018

Symplectic algebraic geometry and quiver varieties

Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials for

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

Dimensions of Triangulated Categories, joint work with M. Ballard and L. Katzarkov

ON THE INTEGRAL HODGE CONJECTURE FOR REAL THREEFOLDS. 1. Motivation

On the Virtual Fundamental Class

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 18 Nov 2017

Homological Mirror Symmetry and VGIT

Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory

SEMINAR NOTES: QUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN S INTEGRABLE SYSTEM AND HECKE EIGENSHEAVES (SEPT. 8, 2009)

Noncommutative motives and their applications

R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications

Part II: Recollement, or gluing

MIXED HODGE MODULES PAVEL SAFRONOV

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 29 Oct 2012

A QUICK NOTE ON ÉTALE STACKS

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

De Rham Cohomology. Smooth singular cochains. (Hatcher, 2.1)

A CATEGORIFICATION OF THE ATIYAH-BOTT LOCALIZATION FORMULA

Lectures on the Orbit Method

The Hecke category (part II Satake equivalence)

8 Perverse Sheaves. 8.1 Theory of perverse sheaves

The curve and the Langlands program

Derived intersections and the Hodge theorem

CATEGORICAL sl 2 ACTIONS

Non characteristic finiteness theorems in crystalline cohomology

Loop group actions on categories and Whittaker invariants. Dario Beraldo

Homological mirror symmetry via families of Lagrangians

PART II.2. THE!-PULLBACK AND BASE CHANGE

INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS FOR COHERENT SHEAVES

CATEGORICAL ASPECTS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY IN MIRROR SYMMETRY ABSTRACTS

Show that the second projection Ñ Fl n identifies Ñ as a vector bundle over Fl n. In particular, Ñ is smooth. (Challenge:

Matilde Marcolli and Goncalo Tabuada. Noncommutative numerical motives and the Tannakian formalism

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

PART IV.2. FORMAL MODULI

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

LAFFORGUE BACKGROUND SEMINAR PART 3 - UNIFORMIZATION OF Bun G

RTG Mini-Course Perspectives in Geometry Series

D-MODULES: AN INTRODUCTION

Cohomological Formulation (Lecture 3)

Categorified Hecke algebras, link homology, and Hilbert schemes

Notes on Partial Resolutions of Nilpotent Varieties by Borho and Macpherson

Characters of the Negative Level Highest-Weight Modules for Affine Lie Algebras

LONDON NUMBER THEORY STUDY GROUP: CYCLES ON SHIMURA VARIETIES VIA GEOMETRIC SATAKE, FOLLOWING LIANG XIAO AND XINWEN ZHU

Darboux theorems for shifted symplectic derived schemes and stacks

Arithmetic of certain integrable systems. University of Chicago & Vietnam Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics

Lectures 1 and 2: General introduction, DG algebras.

D-Modules on the Affine Flag Variety and Representations of Affine Kac-Moody Algebras

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Transcription:

Characters in Categorical Representation Theory David Ben-Zvi University of Texas at Austin Symplectic Algebraic eometry and Representation Theory, CIRM, Luminy. July 2012

Overview Describe ongoing joint work with David Nadler (Berkeley) on categorical harmonic analysis, centered around the notion of characters of categorical representations. (with J. Francis) Integral Transforms and Drinfeld Centers in Derived Algebraic eometry. JAMS 2010. Appendix, July 2012. The Character Theory of a Complex roup. arxiv:0904.1247. Beilinson-Bernstein Localization in Families. Preprint. (Summer) Traces, Fixed Points and Characters in Derived Algebraic eometry. Preprint. (Fall) eometry of Harish Chandra Characters. In preparation. (Spring 2013?) Elliptic Character Sheaves. In progress. (2014?)

Context We will work in the context of J. Lurie s Higher Algebra but suppress -categorical technicalities throughout. For example: category will stand for an enhanced derived category (pre-triangulated cocomplete dg category). The collection of dg categories form a symmetric monoidal -category. In particular we may speak of monoidal dg categories, module categories, etc. For a scheme or stack X, QC(X ) and D(X ) denote the ( -)categories of quasicoherent sheaves and D-modules on X, respectively.

-categories Fix a reductive algebraic group over C, B, N, H, W as usual. Two types of -actions on categories: Algebraic -category: g act coherently on M by functors, varying algebraically Comodule category M for quasicoherent group coalgebra QC() (under pullback for multiplication µ : ) Smooth -category: Algebraic -category, with trivialization of action of Lie algebra g or formal group Ĝ (i.e., algebraic dr-category) Comodule category for smooth group coalgebra D()

-categories Fix a reductive algebraic group over C, B, N, H, W as usual. Two types of -actions on categories: Algebraic -category: g act coherently on M by functors, varying algebraically Comodule category M for quasicoherent group coalgebra QC() (under pullback for multiplication µ : ) Smooth -category: Algebraic -category, with trivialization of action of Lie algebra g or formal group Ĝ (i.e., algebraic dr-category) Comodule category for smooth group coalgebra D()

Examples of -categories Fix a -space (scheme or stack) X = QC(X ) is an algebraic -category, D(X ) is a smooth -category. Main examples: D(/B) and D H (/N), D-modules on basic affine space locally constant on torus orbits categorifications of principal series and universal principal series representations. Motivating example: The adjoint action of on g gives rise to a smooth -action on Ug mod

Examples of -categories Fix a -space (scheme or stack) X = QC(X ) is an algebraic -category, D(X ) is a smooth -category. Main examples: D(/B) and D H (/N), D-modules on basic affine space locally constant on torus orbits categorifications of principal series and universal principal series representations. Motivating example: The adjoint action of on g gives rise to a smooth -action on Ug mod

Algebraic Hecke Categories For algebraic -categories, have complete control of elementary categorical harmonic analysis intertwiners, centers, Morita equivalences, characters, spectral decomposition etc. For example, results of [BZFN] together with aitsgory, Sheaves of categories on prestacks (2012) give the following: Theorem: For any affine H, There are equivalences of monoidal categories QC(H\/H) End QC() (QC(/H)) End(( ) H ) The above algebraic Hecke category is Morita equivalent to QC() no difference between algebraic -categories and their H-invariants (with Hecke action).

Algebraic Hecke Categories For algebraic -categories, have complete control of elementary categorical harmonic analysis intertwiners, centers, Morita equivalences, characters, spectral decomposition etc. For example, results of [BZFN] together with aitsgory, Sheaves of categories on prestacks (2012) give the following: Theorem: For any affine H, There are equivalences of monoidal categories QC(H\/H) End QC() (QC(/H)) End(( ) H ) The above algebraic Hecke category is Morita equivalent to QC() no difference between algebraic -categories and their H-invariants (with Hecke action).

Smooth Hecke Categories Fewer general results hold for D-modules, but still have (in equivariant or monodromic settings): Theorem: End D() (D(/B)) H := D(B\/B), the finite Hecke category, which is a 2-dualizable Calabi-Yau algebra in categories. H is a categorified form of C[W ] analog of finite-dimensional semisimple Frobenius algebra. Corollary: H mod are smooth -categories appearing in principal series subcategory generated by module D(/B).

Smooth Hecke Categories Fewer general results hold for D-modules, but still have (in equivariant or monodromic settings): Theorem: End D() (D(/B)) H := D(B\/B), the finite Hecke category, which is a 2-dualizable Calabi-Yau algebra in categories. H is a categorified form of C[W ] analog of finite-dimensional semisimple Frobenius algebra. Corollary: H mod are smooth -categories appearing in principal series subcategory generated by module D(/B).

Beilinson-Bernstein Localization The two types of smooth -categories are related by Beilinson-Bernstein localization. Localization and global sections functors (, Γ) give adjunction between g-modules and D-modules on flag varieties, linear over D(). To obtain an equivalence of categories we fix an infinitesimal character [λ] h /W ; choose lift to weight λ h ; modify construction at singular λ.

Beilinson-Bernstein in Families Consider derived version in families: : Ug mod D H (/N) : Γ two-sided adjoints, and conservative can readily apply Barr-Beck-Lurie theorem: Theorem: Ug mod D H (/N) W D H (/N) W, modules (or comodules) over the (Frobenius) algebra in the Hecke category W = D N\/N End D() (D H (/N)) Weyl sheaf W: analog of symmetrizing idempotent in Weyl group, Ug mod = Weyl (co)invariants in D H (/N).

Beilinson-Bernstein in Families Consider derived version in families: : Ug mod D H (/N) : Γ two-sided adjoints, and conservative can readily apply Barr-Beck-Lurie theorem: Theorem: Ug mod D H (/N) W D H (/N) W, modules (or comodules) over the (Frobenius) algebra in the Hecke category W = D N\/N End D() (D H (/N)) Weyl sheaf W: analog of symmetrizing idempotent in Weyl group, Ug mod = Weyl (co)invariants in D H (/N).

Dimensions Context: A symmetric monoidal (higher) category, A A dualizable object Dimension of A: dim(a) End(1 A ) defined by unit=id A 1 A End(A) A A counit=tr A 1 A dim(a)=tr A (Id A ) Examples: Dimension/Euler characteristic of a vector space/complex Hochschild homology of an algebra or category

Dimensions Context: A symmetric monoidal (higher) category, A A dualizable object Dimension of A: dim(a) End(1 A ) defined by unit=id A 1 A End(A) A A counit=tr A 1 A dim(a)=tr A (Id A ) Examples: Dimension/Euler characteristic of a vector space/complex Hochschild homology of an algebra or category

Functoriality of Dimension A a 2-category notion of adjunctions between morphisms π! A B π! notion of continuous morphism (has right adjoint) Construction: Dim is functorial for continuous morphisms of dualizable objects: dim(a) dim(π! ) dim(b) Corollary: A dualizable object of A (continuous 1 A V A ) has a character dim(v ) dim(a), satisfying abstract RR 1 A dim(v ) dim(π! V ) dim(a) dim(π! ) dim(b)

Functoriality of Dimension A a 2-category notion of adjunctions between morphisms π! A B π! notion of continuous morphism (has right adjoint) Construction: Dim is functorial for continuous morphisms of dualizable objects: dim(a) dim(π! ) dim(b) Corollary: A dualizable object of A (continuous 1 A V A ) has a character dim(v ) dim(a), satisfying abstract RR 1 A dim(v ) dim(π! V ) dim(a) dim(π! ) dim(b)

Algebraic Examples A=Morita theory of algebras, A = C finite group algebra. dim(a) = C[ ] class functions. V : 1 A A: representation of dim(v ) C[ ]: character of representation. A=Categories, A = QC(X ) or D(X ) sheaves on a scheme (or stack). dim(a)=dolbeault/de Rham cohomology of the scheme (functions/de Rham cohomology of loop stack) V sheaf dim(v ) Chern character.

Algebraic Examples A=Morita theory of algebras, A = C finite group algebra. dim(a) = C[ ] class functions. V : 1 A A: representation of dim(v ) C[ ]: character of representation. A=Categories, A = QC(X ) or D(X ) sheaves on a scheme (or stack). dim(a)=dolbeault/de Rham cohomology of the scheme (functions/de Rham cohomology of loop stack) V sheaf dim(v ) Chern character.

eometric Examples A=(Derived) Varieties/stacks with correspondences: dim(x ) = LX loop space ( X X = X X X X.) π : X Y dim(π) = Lπ : LX LY. X a -space, π : X / B. L(X /) {g, x X g } Lπ L(B) dimension given by fixed point loci classified over adjoint quotient. p

eometric Examples A=(Derived) Varieties/stacks with correspondences: dim(x ) = LX loop space ( X X = X X X X.) π : X Y dim(π) = Lπ : LX LY. X a -space, π : X / B. L(X /) {g, x X g } Lπ L(B) dimension given by fixed point loci classified over adjoint quotient. p

Trace and Fixed-Point Formulas Formal consequence: in any theory of sheaves (assignment stack category satisfying base change and proper adjunction) pushforward on Hochschild homology is given by integration on loop maps, i.e., integration on fixed points in equivariant setting Corollary: rothendieck-riemann-roch in Hochschild homology for proper maps of geometric stacks Lefschetz trace formula for D-modules on proper Deligne-Mumford (derived) stacks Atiyah-Bott fixed point theorem for quasicoherent sheaves on proper Deligne-Mumford (derived) stacks (conjecture of Frenkel-Ngô)

Trace and Fixed-Point Formulas Formal consequence: in any theory of sheaves (assignment stack category satisfying base change and proper adjunction) pushforward on Hochschild homology is given by integration on loop maps, i.e., integration on fixed points in equivariant setting Corollary: rothendieck-riemann-roch in Hochschild homology for proper maps of geometric stacks Lefschetz trace formula for D-modules on proper Deligne-Mumford (derived) stacks Atiyah-Bott fixed point theorem for quasicoherent sheaves on proper Deligne-Mumford (derived) stacks (conjecture of Frenkel-Ngô)

Character Formulas Frobenius character formula: Character of permutation representation C[X ] is Tr(g) = X g : pushforward of constant function under map L(X /). X = /K: character of induced representation C[/K] given by pushforward along {g, x X g } K K Flag variety X = /B Weyl character formula à la Atiyah-Bott: Lπ B B Lπ=rothendieck Springer

Character Formulas Frobenius character formula: Character of permutation representation C[X ] is Tr(g) = X g : pushforward of constant function under map L(X /). X = /K: character of induced representation C[/K] given by pushforward along {g, x X g } K K Flag variety X = /B Weyl character formula à la Atiyah-Bott: Lπ B B Lπ=rothendieck Springer

Character Formulas Frobenius character formula: Character of permutation representation C[X ] is Tr(g) = X g : pushforward of constant function under map L(X /). X = /K: character of induced representation C[/K] given by pushforward along {g, x X g } K K Flag variety X = /B Weyl character formula à la Atiyah-Bott: Lπ B B Lπ=rothendieck Springer

Characters of algebraic -categories Arguments apply unmodified to sheaves of categories and categorical representations: A = QC() or QC(H\/H) quasicoherent group or Hecke algebra (monoidal category) Theorem: dim(a) = QC( ) V algebraic -category dim(v ) QC( ): algebraic character sheaf. Character of QC(X ) for a -space calculated by fixed points map Lπ : LX /.

Characters of smooth -categories A = D(): Natural map dim(a) D( ). Calculate characters by fixed points: Corollary: The character of D(/B) is Lπ O D( ), the rothendieck-springer i.e., [Hotta-Kashiwara] the Harish Chandra system HC on. Characters are microlocal: for a -space can calculate dim D(X ) D( ) near 1 from moment map µ : T X g. Characters for Hecke category H = D(B\/B): Theorem: dim(h) is the category of Lusztig character sheaves in D( ) i.e., differential equations on with same singularities as HC.

Characters of smooth -categories A = D(): Natural map dim(a) D( ). Calculate characters by fixed points: Corollary: The character of D(/B) is Lπ O D( ), the rothendieck-springer i.e., [Hotta-Kashiwara] the Harish Chandra system HC on. Characters are microlocal: for a -space can calculate dim D(X ) D( ) near 1 from moment map µ : T X g. Characters for Hecke category H = D(B\/B): Theorem: dim(h) is the category of Lusztig character sheaves in D( ) i.e., differential equations on with same singularities as HC.

Characters of smooth -categories A = D(): Natural map dim(a) D( ). Calculate characters by fixed points: Corollary: The character of D(/B) is Lπ O D( ), the rothendieck-springer i.e., [Hotta-Kashiwara] the Harish Chandra system HC on. Characters are microlocal: for a -space can calculate dim D(X ) D( ) near 1 from moment map µ : T X g. Characters for Hecke category H = D(B\/B): Theorem: dim(h) is the category of Lusztig character sheaves in D( ) i.e., differential equations on with same singularities as HC.

Harish Chandra Theory of Characters Harish Chandra introduced a character for admissible representations M of reductive groups: The character Θ M exists as a distribution on For M with infinitesimal character [λ], Θ M solves the Harish Chandra system i.e., defines a morphism of D-modules on, HC [λ] := D/ z λ(z) z Z(Ug) Θ M C Properties of HC system imply Θ M analytic on rss, extends to L 1 (). Beautiful algebraic and geometric formulas for Θ M suggest it is innately algebraic object.

Harish Chandra Theory of Characters Harish Chandra introduced a character for admissible representations M of reductive groups: The character Θ M exists as a distribution on For M with infinitesimal character [λ], Θ M solves the Harish Chandra system i.e., defines a morphism of D-modules on, HC [λ] := D/ z λ(z) z Z(Ug) Θ M C Properties of HC system imply Θ M analytic on rss, extends to L 1 (). Beautiful algebraic and geometric formulas for Θ M suggest it is innately algebraic object.

Harish Chandra Theory of Characters Harish Chandra introduced a character for admissible representations M of reductive groups: The character Θ M exists as a distribution on For M with infinitesimal character [λ], Θ M solves the Harish Chandra system i.e., defines a morphism of D-modules on, HC [λ] := D/ z λ(z) z Z(Ug) Θ M C Properties of HC system imply Θ M analytic on rss, extends to L 1 (). Beautiful algebraic and geometric formulas for Θ M suggest it is innately algebraic object.

Representations as Intertwiners Admissible representations of real group R Harish Chandra (g, K) modules for K symmetric subgroup [Beilinson-Bernstein] D K (/B): K-equivariant (twisted) D-modules on /B, i.e., D-modules on K\/B \(/B /K) Suggests an interpretation as intertwiners for smooth -categories: Proposition: D(K\/B) Hom (D(/B), D(/K)) Harish Chandra modules are intertwiners between principal series and symmetric space representations.

Representations as Intertwiners Admissible representations of real group R Harish Chandra (g, K) modules for K symmetric subgroup [Beilinson-Bernstein] D K (/B): K-equivariant (twisted) D-modules on /B, i.e., D-modules on K\/B \(/B /K) Suggests an interpretation as intertwiners for smooth -categories: Proposition: D(K\/B) Hom (D(/B), D(/K)) Harish Chandra modules are intertwiners between principal series and symmetric space representations.

Representations as Intertwiners Admissible representations of real group R Harish Chandra (g, K) modules for K symmetric subgroup [Beilinson-Bernstein] D K (/B): K-equivariant (twisted) D-modules on /B, i.e., D-modules on K\/B \(/B /K) Suggests an interpretation as intertwiners for smooth -categories: Proposition: D(K\/B) Hom (D(/B), D(/K)) Harish Chandra modules are intertwiners between principal series and symmetric space representations.

Harish Chandra Characters via Functoriality Now apply functoriality of dim: M a (g, K)-module M defines a -map M D(/B) D(/K) dim(d(/b)) dim(m) dim(d(/k)) HC [λ] Θ M Ξ K Character is a solution of Harish Chandra system valued in K-Springer sheaf Ξ K = (p K K ) O K K

Harish Chandra Characters via Functoriality Now apply functoriality of dim: M a (g, K)-module M defines a -map M D(/B) D(/K) dim(d(/b)) dim(m) dim(d(/k)) HC [λ] Θ M Ξ K Character is a solution of Harish Chandra system valued in K-Springer sheaf Ξ K = (p K K ) O K K

Harish Chandra Characters via Functoriality Now apply functoriality of dim: M a (g, K)-module M defines a -map M D(/B) D(/K) dim(d(/b)) dim(m) dim(d(/k)) HC [λ] Θ M Ξ K Character is a solution of Harish Chandra system valued in K-Springer sheaf Ξ K = (p K K ) O K K

Properties of the Character Construction applies to any subgroup K (not necessarily symmetric). On the regular semisimple locus of K, Θ M is a section of O K rss solving pullback of HC system. e.g., for K = recover Weyl character. ives refined information and algebraic interpretation of character over entire group. Recover the two geometric character formulas of [Schmid-Vilonen] from general formalism: Weyl-Atiyah-Bott character formula: comes from trace/fixed point formalism which described the map dim. Kirillov-Rossman character formula: comes from compatibility of characters and microlocalization.

Properties of the Character Construction applies to any subgroup K (not necessarily symmetric). On the regular semisimple locus of K, Θ M is a section of O K rss solving pullback of HC system. e.g., for K = recover Weyl character. ives refined information and algebraic interpretation of character over entire group. Recover the two geometric character formulas of [Schmid-Vilonen] from general formalism: Weyl-Atiyah-Bott character formula: comes from trace/fixed point formalism which described the map dim. Kirillov-Rossman character formula: comes from compatibility of characters and microlocalization.

Properties of the Character Construction applies to any subgroup K (not necessarily symmetric). On the regular semisimple locus of K, Θ M is a section of O K rss solving pullback of HC system. e.g., for K = recover Weyl character. ives refined information and algebraic interpretation of character over entire group. Recover the two geometric character formulas of [Schmid-Vilonen] from general formalism: Weyl-Atiyah-Bott character formula: comes from trace/fixed point formalism which described the map dim. Kirillov-Rossman character formula: comes from compatibility of characters and microlocalization.

Properties of the Character Construction applies to any subgroup K (not necessarily symmetric). On the regular semisimple locus of K, Θ M is a section of O K rss solving pullback of HC system. e.g., for K = recover Weyl character. ives refined information and algebraic interpretation of character over entire group. Recover the two geometric character formulas of [Schmid-Vilonen] from general formalism: Weyl-Atiyah-Bott character formula: comes from trace/fixed point formalism which described the map dim. Kirillov-Rossman character formula: comes from compatibility of characters and microlocalization.

Traces of Hecke Functors oal: Develop theory of characters for smooth L-categories, in particular for modules for spherical and affine Hecke categories H sph = D((O)\L/(O)) Satake QC(B L ) H aff = D(I \L/I ) Bezrukavnikov QC! (St L / L ) Motivation: eometric Arthur-Selberg trace formula C algebraic curve with fixed ramification data, describe character of category D(Bun (C)) module for H sph, H aff, D(L) at places with trivial, tame or full level structure.

Traces of Hecke Functors oal: Develop theory of characters for smooth L-categories, in particular for modules for spherical and affine Hecke categories H sph = D((O)\L/(O)) Satake QC(B L ) H aff = D(I \L/I ) Bezrukavnikov QC! (St L / L ) Motivation: eometric Arthur-Selberg trace formula C algebraic curve with fixed ramification data, describe character of category D(Bun (C)) module for H sph, H aff, D(L) at places with trivial, tame or full level structure.

Elliptic Character Sheaves What are character sheaves on L? Hard to define directly as D-modules on L L. Two proposals: Algebraic definition: Consider dim(h aff ), characters of affine Hecke modules. Topological Field Theory definition: q-deform L L to Bun (E q ), -bundles on (Tate) elliptic curve E q = C /q Z Consider D nil (Bun (E q )), D-modules with nilpotent singular support. Locally constant in q, can describe monadically in limit q 0. Claim (proof in progress): dim(h aff ) D nil (Bun (E q )) elliptic character sheaves Langlands duality for Hecke categories Corollary: topological geometric Langlands for elliptic curves.

Elliptic Character Sheaves What are character sheaves on L? Hard to define directly as D-modules on L L. Two proposals: Algebraic definition: Consider dim(h aff ), characters of affine Hecke modules. Topological Field Theory definition: q-deform L L to Bun (E q ), -bundles on (Tate) elliptic curve E q = C /q Z Consider D nil (Bun (E q )), D-modules with nilpotent singular support. Locally constant in q, can describe monadically in limit q 0. Claim (proof in progress): dim(h aff ) D nil (Bun (E q )) elliptic character sheaves Langlands duality for Hecke categories Corollary: topological geometric Langlands for elliptic curves.

Elliptic Character Sheaves What are character sheaves on L? Hard to define directly as D-modules on L L. Two proposals: Algebraic definition: Consider dim(h aff ), characters of affine Hecke modules. Topological Field Theory definition: q-deform L L to Bun (E q ), -bundles on (Tate) elliptic curve E q = C /q Z Consider D nil (Bun (E q )), D-modules with nilpotent singular support. Locally constant in q, can describe monadically in limit q 0. Claim (proof in progress): dim(h aff ) D nil (Bun (E q )) elliptic character sheaves Langlands duality for Hecke categories Corollary: topological geometric Langlands for elliptic curves.

Elliptic Character Sheaves What are character sheaves on L? Hard to define directly as D-modules on L L. Two proposals: Algebraic definition: Consider dim(h aff ), characters of affine Hecke modules. Topological Field Theory definition: q-deform L L to Bun (E q ), -bundles on (Tate) elliptic curve E q = C /q Z Consider D nil (Bun (E q )), D-modules with nilpotent singular support. Locally constant in q, can describe monadically in limit q 0. Claim (proof in progress): dim(h aff ) D nil (Bun (E q )) elliptic character sheaves Langlands duality for Hecke categories Corollary: topological geometric Langlands for elliptic curves.