The Kubo formula of the electric conductivity

Similar documents
Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Lecture 1: The Equilibrium Green Function Method

Symmetry, Topology and Phases of Matter

Time evolution of states in quantum mechanics 1

2 The Density Operator

Adiabatic particle pumping and anomalous velocity

Mixing Quantum and Classical Mechanics: A Partially Miscible Solution

Green s functions for planarly layered media

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Supplementary Information for Quantum heat engines: A thermodynamic analysis of power and efficiency

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2016 Assignment 3

Electrons in a periodic potential

Solution Set 3. Hand out : i d dt. Ψ(t) = Ĥ Ψ(t) + and

Lecture 4: Basic elements of band theory

Lecture 3 Dynamics 29

ADVANCED TOPICS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS II Tutorial problem set 2, (20 points in total) Problems are due at Monday,

d 3 k In the same non-relativistic normalization x k = exp(ikk),

Topological Insulators and Superconductors

Fourier transforms, Generalised functions and Greens functions

Notes on Fourier Series and Integrals Fourier Series

(Dynamical) quantum typicality: What is it and what are its physical and computational implications?

4 Quantum Mechanical Description of NMR

5.74 Introductory Quantum Mechanics II

Organizing Principles for Understanding Matter

Spin-Boson Model. A simple Open Quantum System. M. Miller F. Tschirsich. Quantum Mechanics on Macroscopic Scales Theory of Condensed Matter July 2012

Drude theory & linear response

S.K. Saikin May 22, Lecture 13

Floquet Topological Insulator:

Attempts at relativistic QM

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics Thursday February 21, Problem # 1 (10pts) We are given the operator U(m, n) defined by

Measuring the brightness of classical noise dominated light at the shot noise limit?

Green Functions in Many Body Quantum Mechanics

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problems 1 and 2 of set #5.

INTRODUCTION TO NMR and NMR QIP

TDDFT II. Alberto Castro

Classical behavior of magnetic dipole vector. P. J. Grandinetti

Lecture 2: Open quantum systems

Transient dynamics without time propagation

1 Time-Dependent Two-State Systems: Rabi Oscillations

Quantum Field Theory II

Topological Physics in Band Insulators IV

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

In this chapter, we shall derive the DC and AC conductivities for the Bloch electrons by using a relaxation time approximation.

3.3 Energy absorption and the Green function

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

in terms of the classical frequency, ω = , puts the classical Hamiltonian in the form H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2

Summary Sec. 1.3: The interacting Green s function Feynman diagrams

Helium fine structure Ingvar Lindgren (mod )

Topological Kondo Insulators!

The stability of the QED vacuum in the temporal gauge

Emergent Fluctuation Theorem for Pure Quantum States

SECOND QUANTIZATION. Lecture notes with course Quantum Theory

2.1 Green Functions in Quantum Mechanics

BASIC OF THE LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS. Jiawei Xu April 2009

Topological Properties of Quantum States of Condensed Matter: some recent surprises.

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

MP464: Solid State Physics Problem Sheet

Srednicki Chapter 9. QFT Problems & Solutions. A. George. August 21, Srednicki 9.1. State and justify the symmetry factors in figure 9.

Green s functions: calculation methods

Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions

Theory of Many-Particle Systems

B2.III Revision notes: quantum physics

Spectral Broadening Mechanisms

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 1 Nov 2011

Lecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III): transport models. SS2016: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

PHYSICS 4750 Physics of Modern Materials Chapter 5: The Band Theory of Solids

1 Traces, Traces Everywhere (5 points)

Ph.D. Comprehensive Exam Department of Physics Georgetown University

8 Quantized Interaction of Light and Matter

Floquet Topological Insulators and Majorana Modes

Helsinki Winterschool in Theoretical Chemistry 2013

12. Quantum-classical theory of linear and non-linear spectroscopy

Diagrammatic Green s Functions Approach to the Bose-Hubbard Model

1 Mathematical preliminaries

3 Rigid Spacecraft Attitude Control

Renormalization of microscopic Hamiltonians. Renormalization Group without Field Theory

Generalized Nyquist theorem

SECOND QUANTIZATION. notes by Luca G. Molinari. (oct revised oct 2016)

Numerical Simulation of Spin Dynamics

The Overhauser Instability

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Spectroscopy

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

Fermi surfaces which produce large transverse magnetoresistance. Abstract

Spectral Broadening Mechanisms. Broadening mechanisms. Lineshape functions. Spectral lifetime broadening

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

The quantum state as a vector

LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY

INTRODUCTION TO NMR and NMR QIP

Phonons (Classical theory)

Answers Quantum Chemistry NWI-MOL406 G. C. Groenenboom and G. A. de Wijs, HG00.307, 8:30-11:30, 21 jan 2014

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Chapter 4: Summary. Solve lattice vibration equation of one atom/unitcellcase Consider a set of ions M separated by a distance a,

CONTROLLABILITY OF QUANTUM SYSTEMS. Sonia G. Schirmer

PHY 396 K. Problem set #3. Due September 29, 2011.

Interplay of micromotion and interactions

Linear Theory of Evolution to an Unstable State

Introduction to topological insulators. Jennifer Cano

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Transcription:

The Kubo formula of the electric conductivity

We consider an electron under the influence of an electric field E(t). This system may be described by a Hamiltonian of the form Ĥ(t) = Ĥ0 e i E i (t)x i, (1) with Ĥ0 as reference Hamiltonian. For simplicity, we assume a spatially homogeneous field. We further stipulate that E i = E k δ ik and set ex k = ˆD. The time evolution of the system is given by the Liouville-von Neumann equation: ˆρ(t) = 1 [Ĥ(t), ˆρ(t)]. (2) t We split the density operator ˆρ into a equilibrium part, ˆρ 0, and a timedependent part ˆρ(t), according to (ˆρ = ˆρ 0 + ρ(t)). ˆ We then approximate by ˆρ t 1 ([Ĥ0, ˆρ(t)] E k (t)[ ˆD, ˆρ 0 ]. (3) where use has been made of the relation [ˆρ 0, Ĥ0] = 0. This equation is solved ˆρ(t) = 1 t [ ˆD(t t), ˆρ 0 ]E k (t )dt. (4) We operate here in the interaction picture, implying that ˆD(t) Û 0 (t) ˆDÛ0(t), where the propagator Û0(t) is defined as exp( Ĥ0t). i The change in an observable Ô as a function of time can then be found from O(t) T r{ ˆρÔ} = 1 t [ ˆD(t t), ˆρ 0 ]ÔE k(t )dt (5) We extend the upper integration limit to positive infinity by introducing the temporally non-local function γ: such that γô ˆD(t) = 1 Θ(t)T r{[ ˆD( t), ˆρ 0 ]Ô}, (6) O(t) = We factorize γ to separate the theta distribution: γ(t t )E k (t )dt (7) and observe [1] γô ˆD(t) = θ(t)αô ˆD(t) (8) αô ˆD(t) = 1 T r{[ˆρ 0, ˆD( t)]ô} = 1 T r{ˆρ 1 0[ ˆD( t), Ô]} = T r{ˆρ 0[ ˆD(0), Ô(t)]} (9) 1

In the following step, we identify the operator Ô with the current density operator ĵ l. Setting j l (t = 0) = 0, we obtain from Eqs. (7) - (9): and j l (t) = θ(t t )αô ˆD(t t )E k (t )dt (10) αô ˆD(t t ) = 1 T r{ˆρ 0[ ˆD(0), ĵ l (t t )]}. (11) We find an expression for the conductivity from the Fourier transform of 10, where the Fourier transform of f(t) is defined as f(ω) = f(t) exp( iωt)dt, and the back transform as f(t) = 1 f(ω) 2π exp(iωt)dω. Thus = j l (ω) = j l (t) exp( i(ω + iη)t)dt Θ(t t )αô ˆD(t t ) exp( i(ω + iη)(t t ))dt E k (t ) exp( i(ω + iη)t )dt = σ(ω)e k (t ) exp( i(ω + iη)t )dt. (12) We include here an infinitesimal increment iη to ensure that the interaction vanishes exponentially as t, t. Summarizing: with j l (ω) = σ lk (ω)ẽk(ω), (13) and Ẽ k (ω) = E k0 (t ) exp( i(ω + iη)t )dt, (14) σ lk (ω) = 1 0 T r{ˆρ 0 [ ˆD(0), ĵ l (t)]} exp( i(ω + iη)t)dt. (15) We bring the right-hand side of this equation into a more symmetric form, using the relation where αâ ˆB(ω) = i ω α Ĉ ˆB (ω), (16) Ĉ(t) = dâ (t). (17) dt 2

To justify this result, we operate with the complete bases m m and n n, and set Thus, we have αâ ˆB(t) = 1 ˆρ 0 = m p m m. (18) p m (A mn B nm e iωmnt B nm A mn e iωmnt ), (19) where ω mn (Em En). For the Fourier transform of αâ ˆB(t) we find αâ ˆB(ω) = 2π p m (A mn B nm δ(ω + ω mn ) B mn A nm δ(ω ω mn )). (20) If Ĉ = dâ dt = 1 [Â, Ĥ0], then αĉ ˆB(ω) = 2π i p m ( ω nm A mn B nm δ(ω + ω mn ) ω mn B mn A nm δ(ω ω mn )), (21) from which we obtain Eq.(16). We identify  with the dipole moment operator and derive the following relation between ˆD and ĵ k : ĵ k (t) = 1 d ˆD a d (t). (22) dt where a d is the d-dimensional real space volume per particle. As we use Eq. (17) to substitute for ˆD(0) in Eq. (15), we obtain: σ lk (ω) = ad ω 0 T r{ˆρ 0 [ĵ k (0), ĵ l (t)]} exp( i(ω + iη) t)dt. (23) This expression for σ lk (ω) is referred to as Kubo s formula of conductivity. Using the identity with ĵ l = e a d ˆv l, (24) ˆv l = i [Ĥ, x l] = i [Ĥ0, x l ] (25) we express the current density operators ĵ through velocity operators ˆv. Further, we consider the transverse conductance in the two-dimensional case,d = 2, as relevant for the quantum Hall effect in a graphene sheet. With k = x and l = y, this yields: 3

σ xy (ω) = e2 ωa 2 0 T r{ˆρ 0 [ˆv x (0), ˆv y (t)]} exp( i(ω + iη)t)dt. (26) In order to carry out the trace, we adopt the basis { m }, where We note that Ĥ 0 m = E m m. (27) ˆρ 0 m = F (E m ) m, (28) where F denotes the Fermi-Dirac distribution, and n ˆv y (t) m = n Û 0 (t)ˆv yû0(t) m = exp( i (E m E n )t) n ˆv y m. (29) With the help of the latter statements, and after inserting a complete basis n n = ˆ1 between the operators ˆv x and ˆv y, the integration in Eq. (26) can be performed directly. This results in [2] σ xy (ω) = e2 m ˆv x n n ˆv y m iωa d (F (E m ) F (E n )). (30) ω + η + E m E n Expanding 1 ω+η+e m E n σ xy (ω) = e2 a d up to first order with respect to ω, we obtain m ˆv x n n ˆv y m (F (E m ) F (E n )). (31) ω η + E m E n Note that the zeroth-order term of this expansion does not contribute, as the sum over m, n vanishes for this contribution. Considering the DC conductivity (ω = 0) at zero temperature, and setting η = 0, we find σ xy (ω) = e2 a d (Θ(E F E m ) Θ(E F E n )) m ˆv x n n ˆv y m (E m E n ) 2. (32) The factor following the summation sign is non-zero only if E m < E F < E n or E n < E F < E m. Summing over these two configurations results in σ xy = e2 a d E m<e F,E n>e F m ˆv x n n ˆv y m m ˆv y n n ˆv x m (E m E n ) 2. (33) In the following, we focus on electronic states in lattices, as described by Bloch functions (see (3.116)), assuming m, n to be located in the first Brillouin zone. From Eq. (25), we conclude 4

n ˆv i m = n x iĥ0 m n Ĥ0x i m where i = x, y. Likewise: = E m E n n x i m = E m E n n m, k i (34) m ˆv i n = E n E m m n. (35) k i The latter relation involves a shift of the derivative k i from the ket to the bra position of the scalar product. This is legitimate, as the position operator in k-space (=i k i ) is hermitian in the region considered here, namely a Brillouin zone, and thus a space with periodic boundary conditions. By Eqs. (34) and (35), it holds that σ xy = ie2 a d m n n m m n n m. (36) k x k y k y k x E m<e F,E n>e F The sum over the unoccupied states can be expressed through the sum over the occupied states by employing the completeness relation: n n = 1 n n. (37) E n>e F E n<e F Transforming Eq. (36) by use of the identity (37) we find [3] σ xy = ie2 a d m m m m. (38) k x k y k y k x E m<e F k The contribution to σ xy due to the second term on the right-hand side of Eq. (37) yields an expression that is odd with respect to the exchange of the indices m and n and thus vanishes upon summing over these indices. In what follows, we will consider the two-dimensional case which is of relevance for the planar graphene sheet. In order to take formula (38) into its ultimate form we make two further steps. First, we average the conductivity as given by Eq. (38) over the first Brillouin zone (BZ), involving integration with respect to k x, k y over the Brillouin zone while simultaneously dividing through its area, (2π)2 1 : a d σ BZ xy = ie2 h BZ dk x dk y 2π E m<e F Secondly, we introduce the vector field A k by defining m m m m. (39) k x k y k y k x 1 Each k-space area cell contributes dkxdky (2π) 2 text. to the electron density, see p.91 of the main 5

A k,x = i E m<e F m m, A k,y = i k x E m<e F m m. (40) k y Substituting Eq. (40) into Eq. (39), we find σ xy BZ = e2 dk x dk y h 2π [ A k,y A k,x ]. (41) k x k y BZ or, dropping the superscript BZ: σ xy = e2 dk x dk y h 2π ( k A k ) z. (42) BZ By use of Stoke s theorem, the right-hand side may be expressed as a line integral over the contour of the first Brillouin zone: σ xy = e2 dk A k. (43) 2πh 6

Bibliography [1] T.O.Stadelmann, Antidot Superlattices in InAsGaSb Double Heterostructures: Transport Studies, Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford 2006. [2] G.Tkachov, Topological Insulators, Pan Stanford Publishing, 2016 [3] D.J.Thouless, M.Kohmoto, M.P.Nightingale, M.de Nijs, Phys.Rev.Lett.49, 405 (1982) 7