Time Space Diagrams for Thirteen Shock Waves

Similar documents
Measuring Wave Velocities on Highways during Congestion using Cross Spectral Analysis

Hysteresis in traffic flow revisited: an improved measurement method

Airborne Traffic Flow Data and Traffic Management. Mark Hickman and Pitu Mirchandani

INTRODUCTION PURPOSE DATA COLLECTION

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among

Traffic Flow Theory & Simulation

Marking the Approach- ends. of Channelization

A Study of Red Light Cameras in Kansas City, MO

California Experience With Inside Shoulder Removals

Freeway Detector Assessment- Aggregate Data from the Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor (RTMS)

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

Probe Vehicle Runs or Loop Detectors?

Estimating Density and Lane Inflow on a Freeway Segment

Shock wave analysis. Chapter 8. List of symbols. 8.1 Kinematic waves

The German Autobahn: An ITS Test Bed for Examining Dynamic Traffic Flow Phenomena

Individual speed variance in traffic flow: analysis of Bay Area radar measurements

Signalized Intersections

Freeway Merge Junctions

A hydrodynamic theory based statistical model of arterial traffic

Show all workings for questions that involve multiple choice.

Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report

Transport. Pupil Booklet

We provide two sections from the book (in preparation) Intelligent and Autonomous Road Vehicles, by Ozguner, Acarman and Redmill.

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE IMPACT OF RAINFALL ON FREEWAY TRAFFIC FLOW

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Capacity Drop. Relationship Between Speed in Congestion and the Queue Discharge Rate. Kai Yuan, Victor L. Knoop, and Serge P.

Traffic Flow Theory & Simulation

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011

Variable Speed Approach for Congestion Alleviation on Boshporus Bridge Crossing

U.S. - Canadian Border Traffic Prediction

Spontaneous Jam Formation

EMPIRICAL OBSERVATIONS OF DYNAMIC TRAFFIC FLOW PHENOMENA ON A GERMAN AUTOBAHN

Section 11.1 Distance and Displacement (pages )

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

Improved Velocity Estimation Using Single Loop Detectors

Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope

EMPIRICAL STUDY OF TRAFFIC FEATURES AT A FREEWAY LANE DROP

05724 BUTLER TWP PD /04/ :31 Sun 39:54: :11: F F T 1

c) What are cumulative curves, and how are they constructed? (1 pt) A count of the number of vehicles over time at one location (1).

Some Observations of Highway Traffic in Long Queues

H IG HWAY WINTER OPERATIONS SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL POLICY. Revised January 4, 2016

CAPACITY DROP: A RELATION BETWEEN THE SPEED IN CONGESTION AND THE QUEUE DISCHARGE RATE

2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics. Time Space Diagram and Measurement Procedures Variables of Interest

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

Karen R. Smilowitz, Carlos F. Daganzo, Michael J. Cassidy and Robert L. Bertini

Traffic Impact Study

Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study

Best Practices and Techniques for Clearing Intersection Layouts

AKTIVE SICHERHEIT 4.0. Prof. K. Kompass, Dr. S. Nitsche April 2017

(f) none of the above

H. T. Zwahlen, A. Russ, and T. Schnell 1

Empirical Analysis of Traffic Sensor Data Surrounding a Bottleneck on a German Autobahn

An Improved Car-Following Model for Multiphase Vehicular Traffic Flow and Numerical Tests

arxiv: v1 [physics.soc-ph] 13 Oct 2017

SUMMARY. ) t, UNIT. Constant velocity represents uniform motion. Acceleration causes a change in velocity.

Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

1. Major streets, Central Business District (CBD) and school bus routes. 2. Local streets 3. Downtown parking lots

Derivation of the Yellow Change Interval Formula

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

1.1 Motion and Motion Graphs

Implementation of the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act in Los Angeles County

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

GREEN SHEET. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)

Checklist: Deposing the Driver in an Auto Accident

Lab 1 Uniform Motion - Graphing and Analyzing Motion

Assessing the uncertainty in micro-simulation model outputs

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

Appendix B.1 EMME Model Calibration Memo

DESCRIBING MOTION: KINEMATICS IN ONE DIMENSION. AP Physics Section 2-1 Reference Frames and Displacement

Traffic Flow. June 30, David Bosworth

Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

The graph shows how the resultant force on the car varies with displacement.

Long-Term Evaluation of the Operational Performance of Fixed Time Ramp Metering Control Strategy: A Freeway Corridor Study

Solar Powered Illuminated RPMs

A Proposed Driver Assistance System in Adverse Weather Conditions

Monroe County: Key West and Lower Keys

Displacement, Velocity & Acceleration

Worksheet 1: One-Dimensional Kinematics

Hybrid calibration of microscopic simulation models

CHAPTER 5 DELAY ESTIMATION FOR OVERSATURATED SIGNALIZED APPROACHES

1.2 UNIFORM MOTION PRACTICE

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

DESCRIBING MOTION: KINEMATICS IN ONE DIMENSION. AP Physics Section 2-1 Reference Frames and Displacement

Remember... Average rate of change slope of a secant (between two points)

EXAMINATION OF THE SAFETY IMPACTS OF VARYING FOG DENSITIES: A CASE STUDY OF I-77 IN VIRGINIA

Formative Assessment: Uniform Acceleration

Effectiveness of Experimental Transverse- Bar Pavement Marking as Speed-Reduction Treatment on Freeway Curves

Modeling Traffic Flow for Two and Three Lanes through Cellular Automata

Optimization based control of networks of discretized PDEs: application to traffic engineering

Hybrid calibration of microscopic simulation models

Historical Patterns In Loss-of-Control Events At Specific Road Locations

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

MANAGING TRANSPORTATION & LAND USE INTERACTIONS (PL-58)

Estimation of Measures of Effectiveness Based on Connected Vehicle Data

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks

Transcription:

Time Space Diagrams for Thirteen Shock Waves Benjamin Coifman Institute of Transportation Studies 19 McLaughlin Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 9472 zephyr@eecs.berkeley.edu http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~zephyr first published: 1/16/96 text revised: 12/16/97 ABSTRACT This paper presents microscopic time-space diagrams for several shock waves over 1-2 m distances. The diagrams should be of general interest to researchers studying congested traffic. As such, the primary focus of this paper is on presenting the data rather than analysis. The author is only aware of a handful of similar data sets (most notably the work of Treiterer and Myers from the late 196 s and early 197 s. The small number of studies is due to the inherent difficulties of tracking several vehicles over a long distance. Future work will focus on analysis of the shock waves. KEY WORDS: Highway Traffic, Congestion, Shock Waves, Time-Space Diagrams This work was performed as part of the California PATH (Partners for Advanced Highways and Transit) Program of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The Contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation.

ABOUT THE SEQUENCES This paper presents time-space diagrams for twelve shock waves on I-68 and one shock wave from Hwy 99. In the process of extracting vehicle trajectory data for an on going research project, it became clear that the time-space data were of general interest to fellow researchers studying congested traffic. The author is only aware of a handful of similar data sets (most notably the work of Treiterer and Myers from the late 196 s and early 197 s). For this study, we video taped several sections of highway and calibrated the mapping from the image plane to world coordinates at each site. Individual sequences were digitized at one frame per second and vehicle positions were manually recorded in each frame. Vehicle position was defined to be the projection of the nearest corner of the vehicle onto the ground plane and the same corner was used for all vehicles at a given site. Since the data are from departing traffic, we used the right or left hand corner of the rear bumper. The first section presents twelve shock waves (mostly stop waves) from southbound I-68, just north of Hwy 24 in Walnut Creek, California. Sequences 1-9 were collected during the morning peak on April 24, 1996, while sequences 1-12 were collected during the morning peak on April 29, 1996. Figure 1 shows a sample frame from one of the sequences. All data were observed in lane 3 (the leftmost lane is lane 1). There were no lane changes into or out of lane 3 during the observation periods and the largest vehicles observed were comparable to pickup trucks. Velocity-time diagrams are shown immediately below the time space diagrams for reference. Note that the first vehicle of each sequence is not shown in the velocity diagram and the velocity data for a given vehicle is plotted in the same color as the corresponding trajectory data. All sequences are plotted at the same scale for comparison. Sequences 4,7,8 and 9 show slow waves transforming into stop waves. While sequences 6, 1 and 12 appear to show the start of a second disturbance. The second section presents a single shock wave from northbound Hwy 99 at Mack Rd in Sacramento, California during the morning peak on April 1, 1996. Figure 2 shows a sample frame from this sequence. The left most lane is a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane and the lane begins at the base of the camera pole. Unlike the Walnut Creek data, this sequence does include lane changes. Only the trajectories that entered lanes 2 and 3 within the camera s field of view were tracked, thus, a few vehicles from lane 1 and the on-ramp are omitted because they did not enter lane 2 or 3. Note that an individual trajectory may be split across two or more figures as the vehicle changes lanes. As vehicles recede from the camera the digitized image resolution decreases, introducing measurement noise. This phenomena is evident in the jagged trajectories as vehicles get further from the camera. Of greater significance is the progression of the disturbance over 15 m. It is possible to measure the speed of the disturbance by adding equi-velocity lines to the graph (not shown) and measuring their slope. The disturbance is traveling at approximately 12.5 km/h in both lanes. Note that a backward moving stop wave in lane 3 smears over the slow wave in lane 2 about 5 seconds into the sequence. This stop wave spreading is due to a single driver maneuvering from the on-ramp to the HOV lane. The author would like to thank Michael Lee and Brian Simi of Caltrans for their assistance collecting data.

Figure 1, A sample frame from the I-68 test site

4 I 68, sequence 1 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 2 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 3 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 5 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 6 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 7 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 8 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 9 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 1 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 11 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

4 I 68, sequence 12 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 8 1 12

Figure 2, A sample frame from the Hwy 99 test site

2 Hwy 99, lane 1 18 16 14 12 dist (m) 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12

2 Hwy 99, lane 2 18 16 14 12 dist (m) 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12

2 Hwy 99, lane 3 18 16 14 12 dist (m) 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12

2 Hwy 99, on ramp 18 16 14 12 dist (m) 1 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 12