Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r

Similar documents
Moduli spaces of sheaves and the boson-fermion correspondence

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Moment map flows and the Hecke correspondence for quivers

Stable bases for moduli of sheaves

CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES

Generators of affine W-algebras

W-algebras, moduli of sheaves on surfaces, and AGT

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

MAT 5330 Algebraic Geometry: Quiver Varieties

R-matrices, affine quantum groups and applications

Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

NOTES ON FOCK SPACE PETER TINGLEY

Cohomological Hall algebra of a preprojective algebra

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

The Spinor Representation

The Gelfand-Tsetlin Basis (Too Many Direct Sums, and Also a Graph)

Vertex Operator Algebra Structure of Standard Affine Lie Algebra Modules

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Torus Knots and q, t-catalan Numbers

Vertex Algebras and Algebraic Curves

Topological Matter, Strings, K-theory and related areas September 2016

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

Vertex algebras, chiral algebras, and factorisation algebras

DEFECTS IN COHOMOLOGICAL GAUGE THEORY AND DONALDSON- THOMAS INVARIANTS

3.1. Derivations. Let A be a commutative k-algebra. Let M be a left A-module. A derivation of A in M is a linear map D : A M such that

INTRODUCTION TO LIE ALGEBRAS. LECTURE 7.

Supersymmetric gauge theory, representation schemes and random matrices

QUANTIZATION VIA DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS ON STACKS

Representations and Linear Actions

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Vertex Algebras Associated to Toroidal Algebras

A GEOMETRIC BOSON-FERMION CORRESPONDENCE

CLIFFORD ALGEBRAS AND DIRAC OPERATORS

A Study on Kac-Moody Superalgebras

Hilbert scheme intersection numbers, Hurwitz numbers, and Gromov-Witten invariants

Fock Spaces. Part 1. Julia Singer Universität Bonn. From Field Theories to Elliptic Objects Winterschule Schloss Mickeln

Towers of algebras categorify the Heisenberg double

Fermionic coherent states in infinite dimensions

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Combinatorics and geometry of E 7

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TWO: DEFINITIONS AND BASIC PROPERTIES

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

Deformations of a noncommutative surface of dimension 4

THE p-smooth LOCUS OF SCHUBERT VARIETIES. Let k be a ring and X be an n-dimensional variety over C equipped with the classical topology.

Kac-Moody Algebras. Ana Ros Camacho June 28, 2010

Sheaf cohomology and non-normal varieties

Refined Donaldson-Thomas theory and Nekrasov s formula

REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)

What elliptic cohomology might have to do with other generalized Schubert calculi

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY. p : E B such that there exist a countable open covering {U i } i I of B and homeomorphisms

The geometric Satake isomorphism for p-adic groups

L 2 -cohomology of hyperplane complements

On some conjectures on VOAs

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 15 Oct 2008

Holomorphic symplectic fermions

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

THE MODULI OF SUBALGEBRAS OF THE FULL MATRIX RING OF DEGREE 3

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

VERLINDE ALGEBRA LEE COHN. Contents

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

W -Constraints for Simple Singularities

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

Fractional Index Theory

Lecture 1. Toric Varieties: Basics

Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle

Construction of M B, M Dol, M DR

Coloured Kac-Moody algebras, Part I

SEMINAR NOTES: QUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN S INTEGRABLE SYSTEM AND HECKE EIGENSHEAVES (SEPT. 8, 2009)

Algebra & Number Theory

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

A Z N -graded generalization of the Witt algebra

Betti numbers of abelian covers

QUANTIZED QUIVER VARIETIES

Connecting Coinvariants

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

KIRILLOV THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

LECTURE 20: KAC-MOODY ALGEBRA ACTIONS ON CATEGORIES, II

Equivariant Algebraic K-Theory

BIRTHING OPERS SAM RASKIN

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ra] 5 May 2005

Reductive group actions and some problems concerning their quotients

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras

ARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON THREE DIMENSIONAL HYPERSURFACES

Math 797W Homework 4

Math 594. Solutions 5

An Introduction to Kuga Fiber Varieties

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

3d Gauge Theories, Symplectic Duality and Knot Homology I. Tudor Dimofte Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Morse theory and stable pairs

Representations Are Everywhere

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Higher representation theory in algebra and geometry: Lecture II

QUIVER GRASSMANNIANS, QUIVER VARIETIES AND THE PREPROJECTIVE ALGEBRA

ALMOST COMPLEX PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES AND THEIR MORPHISMS

Lecture 6: Principal bundles

Transcription:

Geometric Realizations of the Basic Representation of ĝl r Joel Lemay Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Ottawa September 23rd, 2013 Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 1/34

Introduction Goal To give a geometric description of the various realizations of the basic representation of ĝl r. Outline 1 Motivation 2 Focus on the principal realization 1 Algebraic description 2 Cohomology and vector bundles 3 Geometric description 3 Generalize to other realizations Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 2/34

Motivation Representations of affine Lie algebras are related (in physics) to quantum states, bosons/fermions (particles that make up the universe), etc... Mathematics (algebra) Physics Vector space V Universe (quantum states) Operators on V Realize affine Lie algebras using operators on V Different Realizations Geometrizing: Creation/annihilation of bosons and fermions Certain creation/ annihilation processes Different "vacuum spaces" (space where nothing exists) "Algebra Geometry" = often leads to new insights. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 3/34

Algebraic Description Definition (Heisenberg algebra) Complex Lie algebra s = k Z {0} Cα(k) Cc, [s, c] = 0, [α(k), α(j)] = kδ k+j,0 c. Action on C[x 1, x 2,... ] (bosonic Fock space) via α(k) x k, α( k) kx k, k > 0, c id. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 4/34

Algebraic Description Basic representation of ĝ = ĝl r or ŝl r Recall ĝ = ( g C[t, t 1 ] ) Cc. Basic representation, V basic (ĝ), irreducible representation characterized by the existence of a v V basic (ĝ) such that: (g C[t]) v = 0, and c v = v. Note: s ĝ in various ways, call this a Heisenberg subalgebra (HSA). Realizations of V basic (ĝ) Given a HSA, as ĝ-modules, V basic (ĝ) = Ω C[x 1, x 2,... ], where Ω = {v V basic (ĝ) α(k) v = 0 for all k > 0} is the vacuum space. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 5/34

Algebraic Description The problem is choice Different choices of HSA s yield different Ω. For ŝl 2: Principal HSA: α(k) e t k 1 +f t k, α( k) k 2k 1 (e t k +f t 1 k ), = dim Ω = 1 (rest. of V basic to s remains irred.). Note: in terms of Chevalley generators, α(1) = E 0 + E 1 and α( 1) = F 0 + F 1 (up to scalar mult.). Homogeneous HSA: α(k) h t k, α( k) 1 8 (h t k ), = dim Ω =. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 6/34

Algebraic Description In general HSA s of ŝl r are parametrized by partitions of r, i.e. r = (r 1,..., r s ), s.t. r 1 + + r s = r and r 1 r s. Two extreme cases: Principal HSA r = (r). Homogeneous HSA r = (1, 1,..., 1). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 7/34

Algebraic Description Definition (Fermionic Fock space) Infinite wedge space, i.e. F := span C {i 1 i 2 i k Z, i k > i k+1, Define zero-charge subspace i k+1 = i k 1 for k 0}. F 0 := span C {i 1 i 2 F i k = 1 k for k 0}. Definition (Fermions) Operators ψ(j), ψ (j) on F: for all j Z, ψ(j) = wedge j, ψ (j) = contract j. This defines an irreducible representation of the Clifford algebra, Cl. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 8/34

Algebraic Description How to describe different realizations? Ex: Principal realization. Define: ψ(z) := ψ(k)z k, ψ (z) := ψ (k)z k. k Z k Z The homogeneous components of : ψ(ω p z)ψ (ω q z) : ωp q, 1 p, q r, p q, 1 ωp q and : ψ(z)ψ (z) :, where ω = e 2πi/r, span a Lie algebra of operators on F 0 isomorphic to ĝl r, and F 0 = Vbasic. Principal HSA given by α(k) i Z : ψ(i)ψ (i + k) :. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 9/34

Algebraic Description How to describe different realizations? (continued) Via the boson-fermion correspondence, F 0 = C[x1, x 2,... ] = C C[x 1, x 2,... ], (1-dim vacuum space), as ĝl r-modules. Need a slight "tweak" to get a realization for V basic (ŝl r). For other realizations... we ll see later. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 10/34

Geometrizing in a nutshell Goal: Find geometric analogs of algebraic objects. Algebra Vector space V Geometry (co)homology of algebraic varieties Linear maps on V Geometric operators on (co)homology Realize algebras using linear maps on V Realize Geometric versions of algebras Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 11/34

Equivariant Cohomology Equivariant cohomology Let X be a (nice) 4n-dim. variety, T = (C ) d torus acting on X. HT (pt) = C[t 1,..., t d ], Localized equivariant cohomology HT(X) = HT(X) C[t1,...,t d ] C(t 1,..., t d ). H T (X) = H T (XT ). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 12/34

Equivariant Cohomology Bilinear form on H 2n T (X) X i X T p pt. For a, b H 2n T (X), a, b X = p (i ) 1 (a b). Bilinear form on H 2(n 1+n 2 ) T (X 1 X 2 ) Given T X 1, X 2 and a, b H 2(n 1+n 2 ) T (X 1 X 2 ), a, b X1 X 2 = p ((i 1 i 2 ) ) 1 (a b). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 13/34

Vector Bundle Operator Operator α H 2(n 1+n 2 ) T (X 1 X 2 ) gives a map α : H 2n 1 T (X 1) H 2n 2 T (X 2) with structure constants Operators from vector bundles α(a), b X2 = a b, α X1 X 2. Let E X 1 X 2 be a T-equivariant vector bundle. Then the k-th Chern class c k (E) H 2k T (X 1 X 2 ). For β H 2(n 1+n 2 k) T (X 1 X 2 ), β c k (E) : H 2n 1 T (X 1) H 2n 2 T (X 2). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 14/34

Shopping List Need: A variety whose cohomology corresponds to F 0. A vector bundle whose Chern classes give the appropriate operators: Heisenberg algebra ŝl r and ĝl r Clifford algebra Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 15/34

Picking the Right Variety (Principal Realization) Definition (Hilbert scheme) The Hilbert scheme of n points in the plane can be defined as HS(n) := {I C[x, y] dim(c[x, y]/i) = n}. Note: dim HS(n) = 4n. Torus action Fix T = C. Action on HS(n) induced by t x = tx, and t y = t 1 y. Fact (by a result of Nakajima, Yoshioka 2005): HS(n) T basis of F0 F. n Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 16/34

Quiver Varieties Definition (Quiver) A quiver is a directed graph, i.e. Q = (Q 0, Q 1 ), where Q 0 = {vertices} and Q 1 = {arrows}. Fix Q: Q 0 = Z r, Q 1 = {k k + 1} k Zr {k k 1} k Zr 0 1 2 r 1 Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 17/34

Quiver Varieties Definition (Nakajima quiver variety) Z r -graded vector space V, v = (dim V k ) k Zr, v = k v k. Let G v := k Z r GL(V k ). Define M := variety whose points consist of i V 0, linear maps C ± k : V k V k±1 for all k Z r, such that C + k 1 C + k 1 V k 1 V k V k+1 commutes, C k C k+1 2 i generates V under application of C ± k. The Nakajima quiver variety is QV(v) = M /G v. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 18/34

Quiver Varieties Theorem (Nakajima/Barth) The Hilbert scheme is isomorphic to the quiver variety with 1 vertex. That is, for Q : we have HS(n) = QV(n). Observation Z r T. Thus, Z r HS(n). Fact: HS(n) Zr = v =n QV(v), (r vertices). QV(v) inherits a T-action. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 19/34

Idea H T ( ) Define operators Heisenberg algebra HS(n) HS(n) Zr HS(n) T Clifford algebra = v QV(v) ŝl r Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 20/34

Picking the Right Vector Bundle (Principal Realization) Vector bundles on QV(v) Tautological vector bundles V k Gv M QV(v) and C QV(v) QV(v) Denote by V k (k Q 0 ) and W, respectively. Note: T-equivariant w.r.t. trivial action on V k and C. On the product QV(v 1 ) QV(v 2 ) Have Hom-bundles: Hom(Vk 1, Vj 2 ), Hom(W 1, V0 2 ), Hom(V0 1, W 2 ). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 21/34

Picking the Right Vector Bundle (Principal Realization) On the product QV(v 1 ) QV(v 2 ) E := k Q 0 Hom(V 1 k, V 2 k ), E ± := k Q 0 Hom(V 1 k, V 2 k±1). Complex of vector bundles E σ te + Hom(W, V 2 0 ) t 1 E Hom(V 1 0, W) τ E (Similar to construction of Nakajima s Hecke correspondence) Theorem ( Licata, Savage 2009) ker τ/ im σ QV(v 1 ) QV(v 2 ) is a vector bundle. Denote this vector bundle by K(QV(v 1 ), QV(v 2 )). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 22/34

Picking the Right Vector Bundle (Principal Realization) Observations K(HS(n 1 ), HS(n 2 )) is a vector bundle on HS(n 1 ) HS(n 2 ). K(HS(n 1 ), HS(n 2 )) Zr is a v.b. on HS(n 1 ) Zr HS(n 2 ) Zr. HS(n 1 ) Zr HS(n 2 ) Zr = v 1,v 2 QV(v1 ) QV(v 2 ). Theorem (L.) K(HS(n 1 ), HS(n 2 )) Zr = v 1,v 2 K(QV(v 1 ), QV(v 2 )). Observation Gives a geometric interpretation of α(1) = k E k. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 23/34

Putting it all together (Principal Realization) Algebraically Geometrically α(k) changes energy n n k = α(k) in terms of K(HS(n), HS(n k)) E k, F k change weight v v 1 k = E k, F k in terms of K(QV(v), QV(v 1 k )) Principal HSA in ŝl r = "Geometric" HSA in ŝl r. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 24/34

Putting it all together (Principal Realization) Definition (Geometric operators) α(k), E k, F k : n H 2n T (HS(n)) n H 2n T (HS(n)), restricted to H 2n T (HS(n)), α(k) := β c tnv (K(HS(n), HS(n k))), E k, F k := γ c tnv (K(QV(v), QV(v 1 k ))), ( v = n). Theorem (Licata, Savage, L.) The E k and F k satisfy the Kac-Moody relations for ŝl r. The α(k) satisfy the Heisenberg relations. Yields a geometric version of the principal realization. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 25/34

Other Realizations (Algebraically) For a partition r = (r 1,..., r s ), Divide an r r matrix into s 2 blocks of size r i r j : r 1 r 1 r 1 r 2... r 1 r s r 2 r 1 r 2 r 2... r 2 r s... r s r 1 r s r 2... r s r s Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 26/34

Other Realizations (Algebraically) Diagonal blocks: Correspond to ĝl r i. Take s copies of the previous construction = "s-coloured" versions of our previous algebras and Fock spaces: s s i, C[x 1, x 2,... ] s, i=1 s Cl i, F s. i=1 Off-diagonal blocks: "Mixed" vertex operators. Operators on (i, j)-th block given in terms of ψ i (z) and ψ j (z). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 27/34

Other Realizations (Geometrically) Need an "s-coloured version" of the Hilbert scheme. Definition (Moduli space M(s, n)) Let M(s, n) be the moduli space of framed torsion-free sheaves on P 2 with rank s and second Chern class n. Note: M(1, n) = HS(n). Thus, M(s, n) is a "higher rank" generalization of the Hilbert scheme. Torus action M(s, n) comes equipped with a natural T = (C ) s+1 action. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 28/34

Other Realizations (Geometrically) Need a geometric interpretation of "dividing into blocks". C -action Define an embedding C T by z (1, z, z 2,..., z s 1, 1). = C acts on M(s, n). Theorem (Nakajima, 2001) M(s, n) C = ni =n HS(n 1 ) HS(n s ). Notation For n N s, let HS(n) = HS(n 1 ) HS(n s ). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 29/34

Other Realizations (Geometrically) Need s-coloured versions of operators. s-coloured vector bundles Similar to the principal case, we have a vector bundle K(M(s, n), M(s, m)) on M(s, n) M(s, m). K(M(s, n), M(s, m)) C is a v.b. on C -fixed points. Can show K(n, m) := K(M(s, n ), M(s, m )) C HS(n) HS(m), is a v.b. on HS(n) HS(m). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 30/34

s-coloured Geometric Operators Algebraically α l (k) changes energy n n k on l-th colour Geometrically = α l(k) in terms of K(n, n k1 l ) Definition (s-coloured geometric Heisenberg operators) α l (k) : n H 2 n T (HS(n)) n H 2 n T (HS(n)), restricted to H 2 n T (HS(n)), Theorem (L.) α l (k) := β c tnv (K(n, n k1 l )). The α l (k) satisfy the s-coloured Heisenberg relations. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 31/34

s-coloured Geometric Operators s-coloured Chevalley operators R := lcm(r 1,..., r s ), (sometimes 2). Can embed Z R T such that HS(n) Z R = HS(n 1 ) Zr 1 HS(ns ) Zrs = QV(v 1 ) QV(v s ). }{{} v l =n l =: QV(v 1,...,v s ) Can show K(v 1, u 1,..., v s, u s ) := K(n, m) Z R QV(v 1,...,v s ) QV(u 1,...,u s ), is a v.b. on QV(v 1,..., v s ) QV(u 1,..., u s ). Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 32/34

s-coloured Geometric Operators Algebraically Ek l, Fl k change weight v v 1 k on l-th colour = Geometrically E l k, Fl k in terms of K(v 1, v 1,..., v l, v l 1 k,..., v s, v s ) Definition (s-coloured geometric Chevalley operators) E l k, F l k : n H 2 n T (HS(n)) n H 2 n T (HS(n)), restricted to H 2 n T (HS(n)), E l k, F l k := γ c tnv (K(v 1, v 1,..., v l, v l 1 k,..., v s, v s )). Theorem (L.) The E l k and Fl k satisfy the Kac-Moody relations for l ŝl r l. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 33/34

Future Goals We have the diagonal block operators. Still need the off-diagonal block operators. The end. Joel Lemay Geometric Realizations of ĝl r Representations 34/34