Ps(X) E PnSn x (1.2) PS (x) Po=0, and A k,n k > -I we get summablllty A, summabllity (L) and A method of summability respectively.

Similar documents
Math 132, Fall 2009 Exam 2: Solutions

Research Article Some E-J Generalized Hausdorff Matrices Not of Type M

A.B. THAHEEM AND NOOR MOHAMMAD. Department of Mathematics Qulad-i-Azam Unlverslt y Islamabad, Pakistan

Research Article Approximate Riesz Algebra-Valued Derivations

On a class of convergent sequences defined by integrals 1

ON SOME TRIGONOMETRIC POWER SUMS

Additional Notes on Power Series

Arkansas Tech University MATH 2924: Calculus II Dr. Marcel B. Finan

Council for Innovative Research

JANE PROFESSOR WW Prob Lib1 Summer 2000

Math 106 Fall 2014 Exam 3.2 December 10, 2014

In this section, we show how to use the integral test to decide whether a series

Research Article Nonexistence of Homoclinic Solutions for a Class of Discrete Hamiltonian Systems

MATH2007* Partial Answers to Review Exercises Fall 2004

MATH301 Real Analysis (2008 Fall) Tutorial Note #7. k=1 f k (x) converges pointwise to S(x) on E if and

ECE 308 Discrete-Time Signals and Systems

INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

Math 106 Fall 2014 Exam 3.1 December 10, 2014

MAT1026 Calculus II Basic Convergence Tests for Series

MATH 312 Midterm I(Spring 2015)

Some Tauberian theorems for weighted means of bounded double sequences

SCORE. Exam 2. MA 114 Exam 2 Fall 2016

Section 5.5. Infinite Series: The Ratio Test

1 Lecture 2: Sequence, Series and power series (8/14/2012)

ds n SOME APPLICATIONS OF LEGENDRE NUMBERS ps(x) (i x2)s/2dsp (x), KEY WORDS ANY PHRASES. Aoed Legenre functions and polynomials, Legenre polynomials,

Research Article A New Second-Order Iteration Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations

Review Article Incomplete Bivariate Fibonacci and Lucas p-polynomials

Chapter 6 Infinite Series

n=1 a n is the sequence (s n ) n 1 n=1 a n converges to s. We write a n = s, n=1 n=1 a n

Math 116 Practice for Exam 3

Quiz. Use either the RATIO or ROOT TEST to determine whether the series is convergent or not.

4x 2. (n+1) x 3 n+1. = lim. 4x 2 n+1 n3 n. n 4x 2 = lim = 3

Are the following series absolutely convergent? n=1. n 3. n=1 n. ( 1) n. n=1 n=1

Exponential Functions and Taylor Series

Please do NOT write in this box. Multiple Choice. Total

Infinite Series and Improper Integrals

The value of Banach limits on a certain sequence of all rational numbers in the interval (0,1) Bao Qi Feng

M17 MAT25-21 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS

REVIEW 1, MATH n=1 is convergent. (b) Determine whether a n is convergent.

Math 25 Solutions to practice problems

Testing for Convergence

Math 113 Exam 3 Practice

Research Article A Note on Ergodicity of Systems with the Asymptotic Average Shadowing Property

On Summability Factors for N, p n k

MATH4822E FOURIER ANALYSIS AND ITS APPLICATIONS

6.3 Testing Series With Positive Terms

Research Article Quasiconvex Semidefinite Minimization Problem

Research Article Invariant Statistical Convergence of Sequences of Sets with respect to a Modulus Function

INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES

Unique Common Fixed Point Theorem for Three Pairs of Weakly Compatible Mappings Satisfying Generalized Contractive Condition of Integral Type

Research Article Carleson Measure in Bergman-Orlicz Space of Polydisc

University of Colorado Denver Dept. Math. & Stat. Sciences Applied Analysis Preliminary Exam 13 January 2012, 10:00 am 2:00 pm. Good luck!

2.4.2 A Theorem About Absolutely Convergent Series

k-generalized FIBONACCI NUMBERS CLOSE TO THE FORM 2 a + 3 b + 5 c 1. Introduction

SHARP INEQUALITIES INVOLVING THE CONSTANT e AND THE SEQUENCE (1 + 1/n) n

62. Power series Definition 16. (Power series) Given a sequence {c n }, the series. c n x n = c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 +

A NEW NOTE ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES

Research Article Convergence Theorems for Finite Family of Multivalued Maps in Uniformly Convex Banach Spaces

174. A Tauberian Theorem for (J,,fin) Summability*)

Ma 4121: Introduction to Lebesgue Integration Solutions to Homework Assignment 5

Chapter 10: Power Series

Sequences and Series of Functions

Math 113 Exam 4 Practice

MH1101 AY1617 Sem 2. Question 1. NOT TESTED THIS TIME

9.3 Power Series: Taylor & Maclaurin Series

Solutions to Practice Midterms. Practice Midterm 1

SOLUTIONS TO EXAM 3. Solution: Note that this defines two convergent geometric series with respective radii r 1 = 2/5 < 1 and r 2 = 1/5 < 1.

The log-behavior of n p(n) and n p(n)/n

Solutions to Tutorial 5 (Week 6)

HÖLDER SUMMABILITY METHOD OF FUZZY NUMBERS AND A TAUBERIAN THEOREM

Carleton College, Winter 2017 Math 121, Practice Final Prof. Jones. Note: the exam will have a section of true-false questions, like the one below.

Math 142, Final Exam. 5/2/11.

SUMMARY OF SEQUENCES AND SERIES

Solutions to quizzes Math Spring 2007

Sequences. A Sequence is a list of numbers written in order.

1. Introduction. g(x) = a 2 + a k cos kx (1.1) g(x) = lim. S n (x).

Math 113 Exam 3 Practice

A Fixed Point Result Using a Function of 5-Variables

ON POINTWISE BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION

PLEASE MARK YOUR ANSWERS WITH AN X, not a circle! 1. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 3. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 5. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 7. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)

SCORE. Exam 2. MA 114 Exam 2 Fall 2017

Infinite Sequence and Series

PRELIM PROBLEM SOLUTIONS

Exponential Functions and Taylor Series

Math 525: Lecture 5. January 18, 2018

Solutions to Math 347 Practice Problems for the final

SOME SEQUENCE SPACES DEFINED BY ORLICZ FUNCTIONS

B U Department of Mathematics Math 101 Calculus I

sin(n) + 2 cos(2n) n 3/2 3 sin(n) 2cos(2n) n 3/2 a n =

Seunghee Ye Ma 8: Week 5 Oct 28

A note on the p-adic gamma function and q-changhee polynomials

(A sequence also can be thought of as the list of function values attained for a function f :ℵ X, where f (n) = x n for n 1.) x 1 x N +k x N +4 x 3

1. C only. 3. none of them. 4. B only. 5. B and C. 6. all of them. 7. A and C. 8. A and B correct

5.6 Absolute Convergence and The Ratio and Root Tests

lim za n n = z lim a n n.

n n 2 n n + 1 +

Some Common Fixed Point Theorems in Cone Rectangular Metric Space under T Kannan and T Reich Contractive Conditions

Research Article Powers of Complex Persymmetric Antitridiagonal Matrices with Constant Antidiagonals

Teaching Mathematics Concepts via Computer Algebra Systems

MATH 413 FINAL EXAM. f(x) f(y) M x y. x + 1 n

Transcription:

Iterat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. VOL. 12 NO. (1989) 99106 99 ON (J,p) SUMMABILITY OF FOURIER SERIES S.M. MAZHAR Departmet of Mathematics Kuwait Uiversity P.O. BOX 5969 13060, Safat, Kuwait (Received December 13, 1986 ad i revised form April 8, 1987) ABSTRACT. I this ote two theorems have bee established. The first oe deals with the summabillty (J,p) of a Fourier series while the secod o cocers with the summabillty of the first derived Fourier series. These results iclude, as a special case, certai results of Nada [I]. KEY WORDS AND PHRASES. (J,p) summsbility, Fourier series, Derived Fourier series. 1980 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES. 42A24, 40GI0. INTRODUCTION. Let {P be a sequece of oegatlve umbers such the radius of covergece of power series o P diverges ad let pcz) p x (1.1) be I. Give ay series I a with the sequece of partial sums {s we write ad Ps(X) E PS x (1.2) PS (x) J (x)= (I 3) If the series i (1.2) is coverget i [0,I) ad lira J (x) s, s x+l we say the series E a or the sequece {s is summable (J,p) is a fiite umber. ([2], [3], p.80). For P=l, with to s, where s Po=0, ad A k, k > I we get summablllty A, summabllity (L) ad A method of summability respectively. k

i00 S.M. MAZHAR Suppose f is a periodic fuctio with period 2 ad itegrable i the sese of Lebesgue over (,). ~ Let f(x) + Z (a cos x + b si x) E A(X). (1.4) The the first derived series of (1.4) is r. (b cos x a si x) z B (x). (1.5) We write @(t) = {f(x 0 + t) + f(x 0 t) 2s} *(t) = {f(x 0 + t) f(x 0 t)} g(t) (t) 2si t/2 s M(t) o Z P x si t ad (t) f *(u.):u du 2. MAIN RESULTS. (t) g(u) u du. (J,p) I this ote we propose to establish the followig theorems o summabillty of (1.4) ad (1.5). THEOREM I. Let {p be a positive sequece such Pk (a) P 0(I), r. 0(pv ad (b) E A2( p. x)l 0(lx), 0 < x < I. O If #(t) o(p(lt)), t +0. the the Fourier series (1.4) is summable (J,p) THEOREM 2. Let {p satisfy the hypothesis (a) of Theorem I. If to s. (c) oz )A ( P x)l O(lx), 0 < x < ad G(t) o(p(lt)), as t+ 0+, the the first derived series (1.5) is summable (J,p) to s. It may be remarked for P ) I, Po 0 our theorems iclude two kow theorems of Nada [I] o Lsummabillty of Fourier series ad its derived series. For a earlier result o (J,p) summabillty of (1.4) uder more striget coditios see

SUMMABILITY OF FOURIER SERIES I01 Kha [4]. Very recetly i 1985 Prem Chadra, Mohapatra ad Sahey [5] have established a similar theorem o (J,p) summabillty with aother set of coditios. 0(I) p (x) 0(x) It may be observed as x I Also it is easy to P see P < (+l) P+l 0,1,2,... ad p (x) 0( imply 0(I). P For if { p is ot bouded the llm. Now usig the well kow result P + 0 I i c x/l 7. x o where radius of covergece of each power series is ad a > 0 with lim (lx) P x. This 7., we fid for e I, 8 o P meas llm (I x)p (x) which cotradicts the ypothesis (lx)p (x) 0(I) as /I Thus coditios (2.1) ad (2.4) of [5] imply P 0(I). 3. PROOF OF THEOREM i. so Let s (x O) deote the th partial sum of (1.4) at x x O. 2 si t _f0 (t) at + o(i) t E0 P x(s(x0) s) f0 =E0 P s (x O) s 2 :f0 2 @ (t)m(t) dt + o(p(x)) /0 (t) E p x cos t dt + o(p(x)) o 2 lx =(f0 +fx. )... + o(p(x)) The 2 x si t dt + o(p(x)) I + 12 + o(p(x)), say. (3.1) Now 2 lx (t) x Ii = f0 =E0 P cos t dt lx ok f0 o(p(lt)) at] f x

102 S.M. MAZHAR Kha [4]. Very recetly i 1985 Prem Chadra, Mohapatra ad Sahey [5] have summabillty with aother set of coditios. established a similar theorem o (J,p) It may be observed 0(I) p (x) P 0(T_x) see P < (+l) P+l 0,1,2,... ad p (x) 0( ẋ) imply 0(I). P For if I p is ot bouded the llm P " + as x I Also it is easy to Now usig the well kow result I r. o x i x+l I ax o where radius of covergece of each power series is ad a > 0 with lim (lx) P x. x/l This Z a, we fid for a I, 6 P o meas lim (I x)p (x) which cotradicts the x+lhypothesis (lx)p (x) 0(I) as x I Thus coditios (2.1) ad (2.4) of [5] imply P 0(I). 3. PROOF OF THEOREM I. so Let s (x 0) deote the th partial sum of (1.4) at x x 0. 2 si _t dt + o(1) s (x 0) s fo (t) t Zo P x(s(x0)s) f0 2_ f @ (t)m(t) dt + o(p(x)) x 0 =2 fo (t) Z p o =2 fx/ fxx) " / o(pcx)) I + 12 t ZO P The 2 (t) x si t at + o(p(x)) x cos t dt + o(p(x)) + o(p(x)), say. (3.) Now 2 1x II = fo (t) ZO px cos t dt o( x (3.2) l"x k o( (lt) at lx fo ffieo Pk

SUMMABILITY OF FOURIER SERIES 103 o(1) Pk _xk+l Pk k kzo ky ( o()k.z0 k+t Z0 x x v Pk o(i) v o(p(x) Z0 k,zv o(i) 0 px Thus Agai where I o(p(x)). 2 k 12 = flx *(t) k.0 k x cos kt Pk! " z xk) Fk(t 7 lx (t) k.z0 (k Pk k k k sl(v)t Fk(t) v0 D(t) Z0 Dv(t) Z0 2 si t/2 (3.3) Uder the hypothesis of Theorem (1 x) 12 0(I) flx p(1t) J, dt t I (lx) dt o(p(x)) lx t 2 o(p(x) (3.4) Thus i view of (3.1), (3.3) ad (3.4) Z o P (S(X0) s) o(p(x)) as x I x This proves Theorem 1. 4. PROOF OF THEOREM 2. As show i ([6], p. 54) we ca assume s 0. so Let T(X0) deote the th partial sum of (1.5) at x x 0. T(X 0) = 0 f0 g(t) si t 2 0 si t/2 dt_f0 cos ( + ) The t g(t) dt 2 g(t) si t 2 w f dt + o(i) cos ( t +) t g(t) dt T + o(1) + T say,1, 2 Z T(X0) P x Z Tl P x + o(p(x)) + O O T2 P x L + o(p(x)) + L 2 say. (4.1)

104 S.M. MAZHAR As show i the proof of Theorem i view of (4.5), L o(p(x)). (4.2) cos( + )t g(t) dt g(t) 0 Z0 P x cos( +) t dt t G (t)h(t) dt d (th(t))}dt _2 f G(t) R(t) + th (t)} dt + say. L2 _2 Eo p x /0 2 f 2 2 fo g(t) H(t) dt fo _2, {JiG(t) li(t)] 0 0 G(t) 0 2 lx fo + Let H() z p x cos( + ) t. The Now sice P 0(I) w /Ix L21 L22 o(p(lt) L21 x l:x dt + fx o(p(lt)) t E dt o o(p(x) + o( J, dt o(p(x) 1x (4.3) as show i (3.2). I view of the hypothesis of Theorem 2. Sice 0(I), we have by usig Abel s trasformatio P d d d t H(t) g P x t cos( +) t Z a( p x) d t (si (+l)t) o 2 si t/2 E A2( x d { t o P 4 sl 2 t/2 Thus 2 a d L22 flx o(p(1t) [ (t H(t))l dt (4.4) (cos t/2 cos( + 3/2)t)}.

SUMMABILITY OF FOURIER SERIES 105 t 2 t 2 t 2 where C is a positive costat ot ecessarily the same at each occurrece, ad i view of the fact o la3( P x) O(lx) (4.5) implies )82( P x)) O(l"X) 0 Hece from (4.4) (lx) o(1) lx p(1t) dt o(p(x)) as show i (3.3). (4.6) t2 Thus from (4.1) (4.3) ad (4.6) the proof of Theorem 2 follows. REFERENCES I. NANDA, M. The summability (L) of the Fourier series ad the first differetiated Fourier series, Qu_a.rt. J. Math. Oxford (2) 13 (1962), 229234. 2. BORWEIN, D. O methods of summability based o power series, Proc. Royal Soc. Ediburgh 64 (1957), 342349. 3. HARDY, G.H. Diverget Series (Oxford, 1949). 4. KAN, F.M. O (J,p) 18 (II) (i972), 1317. summabillty of Fourier series, Proc. Ediburgh Math. Soc. 5. CHANDRA, P., MOHAPATRA, R.N. ad SAHNEY, B.N. Tamkag J. Math. 16 (1985) No. 2, 3741. 6. MOHANTY, R. ad NANDA, M. The summabtltty by logarithmic meas of the derived Fourier series, _Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 6 (1955), 5358.

Advaces i Operatios Research Advaces i Decisio Scieces Joural of Applied Mathematics Algebra Joural of Probability ad Statistics The Scietific World Joural Iteratioal Joural of Differetial Equatios Submit your mauscripts at Iteratioal Joural of Advaces i Combiatorics Mathematical Physics Joural of Complex Aalysis Iteratioal Joural of Mathematics ad Mathematical Scieces Mathematical Problems i Egieerig Joural of Mathematics Discrete Mathematics Joural of Discrete Dyamics i Nature ad Society Joural of Fuctio Spaces Abstract ad Applied Aalysis Iteratioal Joural of Joural of Stochastic Aalysis Optimizatio