GEM's community tools for probabilistic seismic hazard modelling and calculation

Similar documents
GMPE Implementation in OpenQuake (and GEM s Development Tools) Graeme Weatherill

THE SEISMIC HAZARD MODELLER S TOOLKIT: AN OPEN- SOURCE LIBRARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MODELS

Appendix O: Gridded Seismicity Sources

L. Danciu, D. Giardini, J. Wößner Swiss Seismological Service ETH-Zurich Switzerland

GEM Faulted Earth. A Global Active Fault and Fault Source Database

UPDATED PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR TURKEY

WP2: Framework for Seismic Hazard Analysis of Spatially Distributed Systems

Regional Workshop on Essential Knowledge of Site Evaluation Report for Nuclear Power Plants.

AN OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING

Modelling Subduction Zone Seismogenic Hazards in Southeast Asia for Seismic Hazard Assessments

7 Ground Motion Models

Seismology, Seismic Data Analysis, Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation

PEER PSHA Code Verification Project. Christie Hale Norm Abrahamson Yousef Bozorgnia

PSHA results for the BSHAP region

Global GMPEs. Caribbean Regional Programme Workshop Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, May 2 nd 2011

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

A NEW PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MODEL FOR NEW ZEALAND

Overview of Seismic PHSA Approaches with Emphasis on the Management of Uncertainties

GEM Technical Report GEM1 Hazard: Overview of PSHA Software

Performance of national scale smoothed seismicity estimates of earthquake activity rates. Abstract

Overview of the Seismic Source Characterization for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station

BC HYDRO SSHAC LEVEL 3 PSHA STUDY METHODOLOGY

The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Perspectives on Evaluation & Testing for Seismic Hazard

Ross Stein, USGS Geophysicist and GEM Scientific Board Chair

Coulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment

Manila subduction zone

SONGS SSC. Tom Freeman GeoPentech PRELIMINARY RESULTS

6 Source Characterization

Preliminary slip model of M9 Tohoku earthquake from strongmotion stations in Japan - an extreme application of ISOLA code.

Understanding Seismic Hazard Needs for Infrastructure Risk Analysis: Lessons from SYNER-G

Southern California Earthquake Center Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) Thomas H. Jordan

Adaptive Kernel Estimation and Continuous Probability Representation of Historical Earthquake Catalogs

RISK ANALYSIS AND RISK MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR INDUCED SEISMICITY

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington

Non-Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures

A TESTABLE FIVE-YEAR FORECAST OF MODERATE AND LARGE EARTHQUAKES. Yan Y. Kagan 1,David D. Jackson 1, and Yufang Rong 2

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events

Annual Report for Research Work in the fiscal year 2005

From the Testing Center of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models. to the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability

Overview of Seismic Source Characterization for the Diablo Canyon Power Plant

Earthquake Likelihood Model Testing

The New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model: Rethinking PSHA

High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M >= 5 Earthquakes in California

COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES

Discussing SHARE PSHA results for France

Time-varying and long-term mean aftershock hazard in Wellington

Hazard and Vulnerability of Moderate Seismicity Regions

UCLA Earthquake Engineering

Development of Evaluation Method for Probabilistic Seismic and Tsunami Hazards Considering Events Superimposition. Masato Nakajima 1, Yasuki Ohtori 2

Epistemic Uncertainty in Seismic Hazard Analysis for Australia

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 22(1) : (2010) Malaysia

Updated NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Active Tectonic Regions Worldwide

Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Hong Kie Thio AECOM, Los Angeles

Earthquake maximum magnitude estimation considering regional seismotectonic parameters

5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

FOCAL MECHANISMS OF SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE JAVA TRENCH: PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR THE PSHA FOR YOGYAKARTA REGION, INDONESIA

Estimation of Strong Ground Motion: Aleatory Variability and Epistemic Uncertainty

Knowledge of in-slab earthquakes needed to improve seismic hazard estimates for southwestern British Columbia

Seismic Risk in California Is Changing

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Nepal considering Uniform Density Model

Expert elicitation of model parameters for the 2018 National Seismic Hazard Assessment

DOWNLOAD OR READ : SHALLOW SUBDUCTION ZONES SEISMICITY MECHANICS AND SEISMIC POTENTIAL PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Actual practices of seismic strong motion estimation at NPP sites

Research in Induced Seismicity

Site specific seismic hazard assessment a case study of Guanyin offshore wind farm 場址特定地震危害度評估 - 以觀音離岸風力發電廠為例

PROBABILISTIC SURFACE FAULT DISPLACEMENT HAZARD ANALYSIS (PFDHA) DATA FOR STRIKE SLIP FAULTS

9th Workshop on Three-Dimensional Modelling of Seismic Waves Generation, Propagation and their Inversion

Description of faults

The Ranges of Uncertainty among the Use of NGA-West1 and NGA-West 2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations

Azimuth with RH rule. Quadrant. S 180 Quadrant Azimuth. Azimuth with RH rule N 45 W. Quadrant Azimuth

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

BEYOND TRAVELTIMES AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATION What else can seismograms tell us about the nature of earthquakes on faults?

ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

GLOBAL SOURCE PARAMETERS OF FINITE FAULT MODEL FOR STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS OR PREDICTIONS

Scenario Earthquake Shaking Maps in Japan

Recolouring GSHAP: Challenging the status quo of Australian earthquake hazard

DCPP Seismic FAQ s Geosciences Department 08/04/2011 GM1) What magnitude earthquake is DCPP designed for?

THE EFFECT OF THE LATEST SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE TO MALAYSIAN PENINSULAR

Earthquake catalogues and preparation of input data for PSHA science or art?

PSHA for seismicity induced by gas extraction in the Groningen Field

ALM: An Asperity-based Likelihood Model for California

Development of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for International Sites, Challenges and Guidelines

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

THE ECAT SOFTWARE PACKAGE TO ANALYZE EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUES

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O P R O B A B I L I S T I C S E I S M I C H A Z A R D A N A LY S I S

PSHA Study Using EZ-Frisk Software Case Study Baychebaq Dam Site

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

John Shaw CRUSTAL DEFORMATION MODEL: OBLIQUE CONVERGENCE IN THE INNER CALIFORNIA BORDERLANDS ACCOMMODATED BY ACTIVE STRIKE-SLIP AND REVERSE FAULTS

Japan Seismic Hazard Information Station

EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS, SMALL EARTHQUAKES

Opportunities for Source Modelling to Support the Seismic Hazard Estimation for NPP s SYP2016/NST2016 Vilho Jussila, Ludovic Fülöp

A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model

Could M max Be the Same for All Stable Continental Regions?

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Transcription:

GEM's community tools for probabilistic seismic hazard modelling and calculation Marco Pagani, GEM Secretariat, Pavia, IT Damiano Monelli, GEM Model Facility, SED-ETH, Zürich, CH Graeme Weatherill, GEM Model Facility, Pavia, IT

Tools for hazard modelling and calculation Primary Information Historical and instrumental seismicity Geological information Tectonics related information Ground Motion Prediction Equations Hazard Modeller's Toolkit (A suite of tools for the processing of basic information and for the preparation of PSHA Input Models) Seismic Source and Ground Motion Systems (i.e. Seismic Source and Ground Motion Model and corresponding Logic Tree structures) Hazard module of the OQ-engine

Main goals of GEM s hazard component The overall goal of the tools GEM is to make the PSHA input model creation and calculation process fully reproducible and transparent. Instrumental Seismicity catalogue for Atlantis - version 1.0 Available at http://atlantis.org/catalogue STEP 1 STEP 2 Declustering - Method A Code available at http://github.org/atlantis Parameters defined in the report http://atlantis.org/report Completeness - Method B Code available at http://github.org/atlantis Parameters defined in the report http://atlantis.org/report STEP 3 Smoothing - Method C Code available at http://github.org/atlantis Parameters defined in the report http://atlantis.org/report Gridded seismicity - PSHA input Available at http://atlantis.org/input

Main goals of GEM s hazard component Promote the creation of transparent, reproducible, open and testable hazard models - By creating an open repository with PSHA models coming from different parts of the world - By working with the local communities on the completion of new hazard projects - By involving in the activities above the international scientific and engineering community - By offering tools for the preparation of PSHA input models and for the calculation of hazard

Main features of tools developed Open source projects OQ-engine code is available at the following repository http://github.com/gem HMTK code is available at the following repository https://github.com/gemsciencetools/hmtk Coded in python Developed using a unittest approach Everybody can contribute to development under certain rules

Online repository

Hazard Modeller s Toolkit

The hazard modeller's toolkit The Hazard Modeler's Toolkit It s a python library of tools for processing basic information and creating PSHA input models Three main sections: Seismicity Geology Tectonics https://github.com/gemsciencetools/hmtk

Example: smoothed seismicity Tool (Algorithm) Smoothed Seismicity First implementation based on Frankel (1995) approach: Generalised implementation Extended to 3D smoothing Completeness correction factors now configurable (can be switched on or off) Addition of new Kernels simpler in future Configurable Settings Kernel choice Bandwidth B-Value Incremental or Cumulative rates Grid settings Completeness correction factor 3D smoothing Coded but still testing: Isotropic Gaussian (Zechar, 2010), Adaptive Spherical Fisher Kernel (Kagan & Jackson, 2012)

OQ-engine: introduction

Main features OQ-engine A hazard and risk calculation engine Organised into a number of libraries (in case, they can be used separately as more flexible tools for prototyping and research) oq-hazardlib oq-risklib oq-nrmllib

Supported architectures and OSs On your laptop On your cluster The OQ-engine can run on a single machine as well as on a cluster of computers The Operative System currently supported is Ubuntu Linux (support for additional Operative Systems might be also available in the future) OQ works from the command line i.e. no GUI is available On clouds accessible through the OpenQuake portal

A single software for multiple use cases Classical PSHA used for regional/national scale hazard assessment as well as in site-specific studies Event-based PSHA used for the calculation of losses of a distributed set of assets Scenario hazard used for urban scale loss analysis Disaggregation (currently only for Classical PSHA) used for the definition of the controlling event/s e.g. for the calculation of the conditional mean spectrum (Baker, 2011)

Hazard module A summary of the main OQ-engine features: Based on a standardized and flexible input data format Earthquake Rupture Forecast creation for different tectonic regimes (e.g. active shallow crust, stable continental regions, subduction) Calculate hazard considering spatially variable site conditions Stochastic Event Set generation Ground Motion fields calculation (eventually accounting for spatial correlation of ground motion within-event residuals) Supports logic trees Disaggregation

Documentation OQ-engine manual and OQ-engine risk book are available http://www.globalquakemodel.org/openquake/support/documentation/

OQ-engine: input data model

Input model An OQ-engine PSHA input model is always described by means of a logic tree structure The OQ-engine offers a framework, based on the NRML format (XML), to programmatically define logic trees describing epistemic uncertainties in the source and ground motion models. OpenQuake-engine: Structure of the PSHA Input Model Configuration file Seismic Source Logic Tree Initial Seismic Source Model A Ground Motion Logic Tree Initial Seismic Source Model B...

Modeling Earthquake Sources Five source typologies: Point Source Area Source Can be used for modeling distributed seismicity With floating ruptures Simple Fault Source Complex Fault Source Characteristic fault Source Can be used for modeling shallow crustal faults, subduction faults Without floating ruptures

The Point Source Mmin = 5.0, Mmax = 6.0 Upper Seismogenic depth Hypocenter position (lon,lat) Lower Seismogenic depth Nodal Plane (strike, dip, rake) distribution (allowing distribution rates over multiple rupture orientations/styles) Hypocenter Depth distribution (allowing distribution ruptures over depth) Magnitude Frequency Distribution Magnitude Scaling relationship Rupture Aspect Ratio

The Point Source Mmin = 5.0, Mmax = 6.0 Mmin = 5.0, Mmax = 6.5 Ruptures are reshaped as soon as their width exceed the maximum rupture width (constrained by dip angle and upper and lower seismogenic depths) - Rupture area is preserved

The Point Source Examples of rupture sets that can be generated using different nodal plane distributions Multiple dip angles Multiple strike angles

The Point Source Examples of rupture sets that can be generated using different nodal plane and hypocentral depth distributions Multiple strike angles and hypocentral depths

The Area Source

The Simple Fault Source Fault trace Upper seismogenic depth Lower seismogenic depth Dip angle y Rupture size and shape

The Complex Fault Source Sumatra Subduction Model from SLAB 1.0 Top and bottom edges Magnitude Frequency Distribution Magnitude Scaling Relationship Aspect ratio Rake

The Characteristic Fault Source The only fault source type supported in the OQ-engine without floating ruptures Parameters: A group of rectangular fault surfaces OR one simple fault surface OR one complex fault surface Magnitude Frequency Distribution Rake

Software testing

Software testing OpenQuake-hazardlib is developed using unit testing procedures i.e. each function in the software is tested by a corresponding code implementing a number of use cases and aiming at checking correctness tests/source/complex_fault_test 92 0 100% tests/source/point_test 280 1 99% 58 tests/source/rupture_test 46 0 100% tests/source/simple_fault_test 117 0 100% tests/speedups_test 38 1 97% 59 tests/tom_test 32 0 100% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 8942 388 96% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OpenQuake-hazardlib uses the PEER Tests as Quality Assurance Tests Thomas et al. (2010). Verification of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Computer Programs. Peer report 2010/106.

Software testing: PEER Tests Vertical Strike-Slip fault with Truncated Gutenberg Richter MFD

Preliminary models implemented

Examples of hazard models implemented United States 2008 (USGS) Canada (Canada Geological Survey) Alaska 2007 (USGS) Japan 2012 (J-SHIS NIED) SHARE (EU funded project) Australia (Geoscience Australia) South America 2010 (USGS) Mexico (UNAM) Taiwan (Cheng et al., 2007) OpenQuake J-SHIS

OQ-engine hazard Use examples [fall 2012] verification calculations of the SSHAC level 3 project sponsored by Eskom (a South African electricity public utility) [winter 2012/2013] calculation of the new generation of hazard maps in Europe (SHARE project) [spring-summer 2012/2013] calculation of the new generation of hazard maps in the Middle East (EMME project) [fall 2013] calculation of the new generation of hazard maps in Central Asia (EMCA project)

2012- Version 2 Stochastic event set and ground motion fields Total number of sources: 10756 Total number of ruptures: 120832 Gridded Seismicity

Stochastic event set and ground motion fields

Thank you http://globalquakemodel.org