Antifreeze design for Muon Detector of LHAASO

Similar documents
Accurate Measurement of the Cosmic Ray Proton Spectrum from 100TeV to 10PeV with LHAASO

Timing calibration of the LHAASO-KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors

Long-term stability plastic scintillation for LHAASO-KM2A

Primary cosmic ray mass composition above 1 PeV as measured by the PRISMA-YBJ array

Study of Performance Improvement for Air Shower Array with Surface Water Cherenkov Detectors

Gamma/Proton separation study for the LHAASO-WCDA detector

PoS(ICRC2017)326. The influence of weather effects on the reconstruction of extensive air showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Measurement of the Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum with ARGO-YBJ

PoS(ICRC2015)641. Cloud Monitoring using Nitrogen Laser for LHAASO Experiment. Z.D. Sun 1,Y. Zhang 2,F.R. Zhu 1 for the LHAASO Collaboration

PoS(ICRC2015)430. Shower reconstruction performance of the new Tibet hybrid experiment consisting of YAC-II, Tibet-III and MD arrays

PoS(ICRC2015)424. YAC sensitivity for measuring the light-component spectrum of primary cosmic rays at the knee energies

Gamma-Ray Astronomy with a Wide Field of View detector operated at Extreme Altitude in the Southern Hemisphere.

Neutron flux measurement using fast-neutron activation of 12 B and 12 N isotopes in hydrocarbonate scintillators

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 28 Jan 2013

Measurement of the cosmic ray spectrum and chemical composition in the ev energy range

Study of Solar Gamma Rays basing on Geant4 code

Longitudinal profile of Nµ/Ne in extensive air showers: Implications for cosmic rays mass composition study

The cosmic rays web monitor of the LAGO project

Parameters Sensitive to the Mass Composition of Cosmic Rays and Their Application at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Bright gamma-ray sources observed by DArk Matter Particle Explorer

Measurement of the cosmic ray all-particle and light-component energy spectra with the ARGO- YBJ experiment

The cosmic ray energy spectrum measured using the Pierre Auger Observatory

The LHAASO-KM2A detector array and physical expectations. Reporter:Sha Wu Mentor: Huihai He and Songzhan Chen

PoS(ICRC2017)945. In-ice self-veto techniques for IceCube-Gen2. The IceCube-Gen2 Collaboration

Analytic description of the radio emission of air showers based on its emission mechanisms

Development of Analysis Method using GEANT4 for Cosmic Ray Radiography

7 th International Workshop on New Worlds in Astroparticle Physics São Tomé, September 2009 THE AMIGA PROJECT

Depth of maximum of air-shower profiles at the Pierre Auger Observatory: Measurements above ev and Composition Implications

On the Combined Analysis of Muon Shower Size and Depth of Shower Maximum

EAS lateral distribution measured by analog readout and digital readout of ARGO-YBJ experiment

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

Combined Search for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Annihilation in the Galactic Center using IceCube and ANTARES

LATTES Large Array Telescope to Tracking Energetic Sources

Measurement of the CR e+/e- ratio with ground-based instruments

Observations with the Mini Neutron Monitor at Sierra Negra, Mexico

PoS(ICRC2017)330. Influence of weather conditions in the Yakutsk array region on Cherenkov light flux measurements. Igor Petrov

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 8 Apr 2015

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)008. Status of the KM3NeT/ARCA telescope

Cosmic Rays - in Poland

1. Introduction on Astroparticle Physics Research options

Zero degree neutron energy spectra measured by LHCf at s = 13 TeV proton-proton collision

PoS(ICRC2015)432. Simulation Study On High Energy Electron and Gamma-ray Detection With the Newly Upgraded Tibet ASgamma Experiment

PoS(ICRC2017)775. The performance of DAMPE for γ-ray detection

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 14 Sep 2017

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 13 Sep 2017 Julian Sitarek University of Łódź, PL Lodz, Poland

HAWC and the cosmic ray quest

Search for GeV neutrinos associated with solar flares with IceCube

Arrival directions of the highest-energy cosmic rays detected by the Pierre Auger Observatory

Primary CR Energy Spectrum and Mass Composition by the Data of Tunka-133 Array. by the Tunka-133 Collaboration

PoS(ICRC2017)765. Towards a 3D analysis in Cherenkov γ-ray astronomy

Mass Composition Study at the Pierre Auger Observatory

PoS(ICRC2017)297. Modeling of the Earth atmosphere ionization by a galactic cosmic ray protons with RUSCOSMICS. Speaker. Maurchev E.A. Balabin Yu.V.

Investigation of Obscured Flat Spectrum Radio AGN with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory

PoS(NOW2016)041. IceCube and High Energy Neutrinos. J. Kiryluk (for the IceCube Collaboration)

The Cosmic Ray Air Fluorescence Fresnel lens Telescope (CRAFFT) for the next generation UHECR observatory

Measurements of Heavy Nuclei with the CALET Experiment

Muon track reconstruction and veto performance with D-Egg sensor for IceCube-Gen2

Complex set of cosmic rays monitoring

Very High Energy Gamma Ray Astronomy and Cosmic Ray Physics with ARGO-YBJ

Determination of parameters of cascade showers in the water calorimeter using 3D-distribution of Cherenkov light

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Tale of Two Observatories

THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY: STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS

A CORSIKA study on the influence of muon detector thresholds on the separability of primary cosmic rays at highest energies

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Dec 2016

The Pierre Auger Observatory and ultra-high energy neutrinos: upper limits to the diffuse and point source fluxes

UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory

Studies of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays with the Pierre Auger Observatory

A Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory : the LHAASO Project

Measurement of the Solar Magnetic Field effect on cosmic rays using the Sun shadow observed by the ARGO-YBJ experiment

Muon detector and muon flux measurement at Yangyang underground laboratory for the COSINE-100 experiment

Dependence of the GRAPES-3 EAS particle density and trigger rate on atmospheric pressure and temperature

32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011

EAS spectrum in thermal neutrons measured with PRISMA-32

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

Water Cherenkov Detector installation by the Vertical Muon Equivalent technique

Air Shower Measurements from PeV to EeV

An Underground Laboratory for a Multi-Detector Experiment. Karsten Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Measurement of High Energy Neutrino Nucleon Cross Section and Astrophysical Neutrino Flux Anisotropy Study of Cascade Channel with IceCube

PoS(ICRC2017)420. Study on a wide field-of-view Cherenkov telescope with large dimensional refractive lens for high energy Cosmic Rays detection

Latest results and perspectives of the KASCADE-Grande EAS facility

From the Knee to the toes: The challenge of cosmic-ray composition

Recent results on UHECRs from the Pierre Auger Observatory. Olivier Deligny (IPN Orsay), on behalf the Pierre Auger Collaboration

PoS(ICRC2015)635. The NICHE Array: Status and Plans. Douglas R Bergman

STUDY ON MASS COMPOSITION OF EXTENSIVE AIR SHOWER WITH ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS USING Q PARAMETER AND THEIR MUON COMPONENT

Numerical study of the electron lateral distribution in atmospheric showers of high energy cosmic rays

PoS(ICRC2017)1076. Studies of Cosmic-Ray Proton Flux with the DAMPE Experiment

PoS(ICRC2017)168. PSD performance and charge reconstruction with DAMPE

Calibration of large water-cherenkov Detector at the Sierra Negra site of LAGO

Observations of the Crab Nebula with Early HAWC Data

Overview of the GRB observation by POLAR

Measurement of nuclear recoil responses of NaI(Tl) crystal for dark matter search

Cherenkov Detector. Cosmic Rays Cherenkov Detector. Lodovico Lappetito. CherenkovDetector_ENG - 28/04/2016 Pag. 1

Diffuse axion-like particle searches

Ultra- high energy cosmic rays

A Monte Carlo simulation study for cosmic-ray chemical composition measurement with Cherenkov Telescope Array

The KASCADE-Grande Experiment

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Jul 2017

Short review and prospects of radio detection of high-energy cosmic rays. Andreas Haungs

A method to measure transit time spread of photomultiplier tubes with Cherenkov light

Status and Perspectives for KM3NeT/ORCA

Transcription:

Antifreeze design for Muon Detector of LHAASO Shaohui Feng,(Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences), for the LHAASO Collaboration E-mail: fengsh@ihep.ac.cn Gang Xiao E-mail: xiaog@ihep.ac.cn Cong Li E-mail: licong@ihep.ac.cn Xiong Zuo E-mail: zuoxiong@ihep.ac.cn Lingyu Wang E-mail: wangly@ihep.ac.cn Ning Cheng E-mail: chengning@ihep.ac.cn Huihai He E-mail: hhh@ihep.ac.cn Yi Zhang E-mail: zhangyi@ihep.ac.cn In the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory project, Muon Detectors will be built at 4400m above sea level. As Water Cerenkov Detector, 44 tons of ultrapure water should be infused into the Muon Detector. In this cold area, once the water inside the Muon Detector freezes, consequence would be very serious. In this paper, a simulation of water temperature is built, the simulation data are consistent with the temperature data of Muon Detector at Yangbajing Tibet. Using the same simulation with air temperature, soil moisture and temperature of Dao Cheng, an antifreeze solution was designed. Through two years of testing, the design is successful. 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference ICRC2017 10 20 July, 2017 Bexco, Busan, Korea Speaker. The LHAASO Collaboration c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) will explore basic problems such as the origin of high-energy cosmic rays and relevant evolution of the universe, with the highest sensitivity to ultra-high energy gamma rays, the highest survey sensitivity to very highenergy gamma ray sources, and wide cosmic ray energy coverage [1][2][3]. Covering a total area of 1.2 km 2, LHAASO consists of a Kilometer-square Array (KM2A), a water Cherenkov Detector Array (WCDA) and a Wide-field Cherenkov telescope Array (WFCTA). 1,171 MDs will be built in the area with a spacing of 30 m throughout the whole array [4]. Such a large area of MDs would contribute to background-free observation of gamma rays, because gamma ray-induced showers contain scarce muons, whereas hadronic showers are abundant in muons [5]. The number of muons in hadronic showers is correlated with the nucleon number of primary hadrons and can be used to discriminate the compositions of primary hadrons [6][7], thus KM2A could help solve the problem in the cosmic rays spectrum at around the "knee" energy region (10 13 10 18 ev). Furthermore, information on muon content in hadronic showers helps in testing the hadronic interaction models [8][9][10][11]. The MD adopts water Cherenkov technique to detect secondary muons in showers of cosmic rays. In order to achieve the main physical purposes, the MD unit should match the design as follows: Each muon detector includes a 6.8m-diameter concrete tank containing a sealed liner with a reflective inner surface, and the liner contains pure water. Cherekov light produced by the passage of particles through the water is collected by one eightinch-diameter PMT which is at the top center of the tank and looks downwards into the water through a window of optical EVA plastic. A 2.5 m thick shielding soil covers the tank to eliminate the electromagnetic components in showers. Based on the design of MD, 44 tons of ultrapure water should be infused into the Muon detector. In this cold area, once the water inside the Muon detector freezes, consequence would be very serious. In this paper, a simulation of water temperature is built, the simulation data are consistent with the temperature data of Muon detector at Yangbajing Tibet. Using the same simulation with air temperature, soil moisture and temperature of Dao Cheng, an antifreeze solution was designed. Through two years of testing, the design is successful. 2. Thickness calculation for Antifreeze layer Conduction, convection and radiation are the three modes of heat transfer. Muon Detectors are buried in the deep ground, conduction is the main heat transfer pathway. The Thermodynamics Empirical formula as follows: Q = T 1 T w 1 a 1 + R + 1 (2.1) a 2 R = (d 1 λ 1 ) + (d 1 λ 2 ) + (d n λ n ) (2.2) Where Q is thermal flux, it means that when there is a temperature difference on both sides of the object, it is transmitted by heat through the object within the unit time. According to the 2

antifreeze design specification, Q = 11 W/m 2 ; T 1 is the lowest air temperature on the surface of the soil in winter. According to measurement data, T 1 = 27.6 C, which is the lowest average temperature; T w is the lowest water temperature for MD in winter. Once the water inside the Muon Detector freezes, consequence would be very serious, T w should be 0 C. In this paper, T w = 0 C; a 1 is Heat transfer coefficient between soil and air, a 1 = 23.26W/m 2 C; a 2 is Heat transfer coefficient between soil and water, a 2 = 58.15W/m 2 C; d n are the thickness of different material; λ n are the thickness of different material; Consider the Antifreeze performance and price, Polyurethane is used as an anti-freeze material for MD. As the Thermal conductivity is 0.04W/m K, Polyurethane, which is 100mm, is adopted to ensure that water is not frozen. 3. Water Temperature simulation 3.1 Finite element simulation According to the MD design parameters, a transient thermal analysis model has been established. Muon Detectors are buried in the ground, the temperature field is very complicated. In this paper, the temperature field is simplified: a) The soil is a complex mixture, it belongs to the heterogeneous medium, in order to ease of calculation, the soil around MD is reduced to isotropic homogeneous medium; b) Because of the symmetry on the both sides of MD, half of the vertical axis of the MD tank had been taken as a calculation area; c) Assume that the MD tank is not moved after been set, and water transfer in soil is not been considered; d) Assume that the temperature of MD water only affects the surrounding soil temperature, there is no affects when the distance is more than 15m; The Finite element model is shown in Fig.1 Figure 1: Finite element mode. 3.2 Parameter Setting Steps for MD transient thermal simulation include Create the model,applied load and solution, Reprocessing. 3

For the model of MD, the air temperature on the surface of soil is only the input factor, the water temperature in MD is the output factor. When the applied load, the air temperature on the surface of soil is fitted as a function: T = P 0 + P 1 sin (2 π) (T IME P 3) P 2 (3.1) Where P 0 is the average annual air temperature on the surface of soil. According to the empirical formula, P 0 should be 2 more than the real value; P 1 is the amplitude for air temperature on the surface of soil; P 2 is the period for air temperature on the surface of soil; P 3 is the phase deviation for air temperature on the surface of soil; T IME is time (day); T is the air temperature on the surface of soil with corresponding time. The calculation results are obtained by finite element simulation. 4. The data analysis 4.1 Simulation data and measured data analysis for MD at Yangbajing Tibet Two MD prototypes were built respectively at Yangbajing Tibet in 2012 and 2014. In order to verify the correctness of MD model, a simulation has been made using the basic parameters from the Yangbajing Tibet. Basic parameters were shown in Table.1: Table 1: Thermodynamic calculation paramete. Material Density Thermal conductivity Specific heat capacity (Kg/m 3 ) (W/m 2 C) (J/Kg C) Water 996 0.599 4185 Soil 1450 0.4 840 Air 1.293 0.024 1000 Reinforced Concrete 3000 0.38 1880 The average annual air temperature of Yangbajing Tibet is shown in Fig.2: Figure 2: The annual average air temperature of Yangbajing Tibet. The air temperature on the surface of soil at Yangbajing Tibet is shown in Fig.3: 4

Figure 3: The air temperature on the surface of soil at Yangbajing Tibet. Where the yellow line is the average air temperature fitting function; the red line is the limit air temperature which is fitted as the function 4.1. (2 π) (T IME 273) T = 2.7 + 15.7 sin 365 The simulation data of water temperature in MD is compared with the measured data, and the results are shown in Fig.4 - Fig.7. Figure 4: Measured data of water temperature in MD(2012). (4.1) Fig.4 is the measured data of water temperature in MD, which was built in 2012. The MD tank was placed on the ground. Fitting the measured data, P 0 =6.7; P 1 =6.4; P 2 =364; P 3 =156. Figure 5: Water temperature comparison between simulated and measured(2012). 5

Fig.5 is water temperature in MD comparison between simulated and measured. The blue line is simulation data, the red line is measured data. The difference between the measured and simulation data is less than 1 C. Figure 6: Measured data of water temperature in MD(2014). Fig.6 is the measured data of water temperature in MD, which was built in 2014. The MD tank was placed on the ground. Fitting the measured data, P 0 =10.35; P 1 =4.98; P 2 =366; P 3 =150. Figure 7: Water temperature comparison between simulated and measured(2014). Fig.7 is water temperature in MD comparison between simulated and measured. The blue line is simulation data, the red line is measured data. The difference between the measured and simulation data is less than 1 C. One MD tank was placed on the ground, another MD tank was buried deep underground. For Two MD prototypes, as shown in Table.2, measured data is approximate to respective simulation data, it proves that the MD model is correct. Table 2: Water temperature comparison between simulated and measured. Similarity Peak Valley Mean Slope Phase Phase Data 82% 85% 85% 92% 100 Day 90 Day 4.2 Simulation data and measured data analysis for MD at DaoCheng SiChuan Muon Detectors will be built at Daocheng Sichuan province. In order to study MDs antifreeze design at DaoCheng, a simulation which is the same model as Yangbajing Tibet has been made using the new site basic parameters. 6

Fig.4 is the annual average air temperature of Yangbajing Tibet, it shows the average annual temperature fluctuate 5 C during eight years. To preventation of extreme cases, the case of annual average 5 C drop is considered in the simulation. Because of terrain restrictions, not all MDs is buried in the ground. According to the location of the MD in the soil, there are three types. Base on the bottom of the MD tank, Marsh type, the MD can be placed on the ground; Shallow type, the MD should be buried at 1.2 m underground; Deep type, the MD should be buried at 4.2 m underground. Fig.8 shows the simulation result. Figure 8: Simulation resul for DaoCheng. Consider the models error, a conclusion can be obtained: Where Marsh type, 15cm antifreeze layer should be adopted, it ensures the lowest water temperature of MD is 2 C-4 C, extreme temperature above 0 C; Shallow type, 10cm antifreeze layer should be adopted, it ensures the lowest water temperature of MD is 2 C-4 C, extreme temperature above 0 C; Deep type, 10cm antifreeze layer should be adopted, it ensures the lowest water temperature of MD is 2 C-4 C, extreme temperature above 0 C. To verify the simulation results, three type of MDs were built at Daocheng Sichuan province in 2015. Water temperature in the MD center and water temperature in the MD boundary and the soil temperature outside the MD were measured, every position have three temperature sensors. Fig.9 is the measured data of water temperature in marsh type MD. The blue lines are the water temperature in the MD center, the red lines are the water temperature of the water in the MD boundary, the black lines are the soil temperature outside the MD. Fig.9 shows that measured data is approximate to respective simulated data, it proves that the simulation results are correct, antifreeze design is feasible. In addition, through the measured data, it can be found that the water temperature changes more quickly between 3.5 C and 4 C, the reason is that water density is the maximum at 4 C, water convection movement up and down at this temperature, consequently accelerate heat exchange. 5. Summary and Conclusions Studying the water temperature of two MD prototypes at Yangbajing Tibet, measured data is approximate to respective simulation data, it proves that the MD model is correct. Studying the water temperature of three MD prototypes at Daocheng Sichuan, measured data is approximate to respective simulation data, it proves that antifreeze design is feasible. 7

Figure 9: Measured data of water temperature in MD (Marsh Type). Consider the Antifreeze performance and price, Polyurethane is used as an anti-freeze material for MD array. Marsh type, 15cm antifreeze layer should be adopted; Shallow type, 10cm antifreeze layer should be adopted; Deep type, 10cm antifreeze layer should be adopted. Acknowledgements This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of China under contacts No.11635011. References [1] Z. Cao et al., LHAASO Collaboration, 31st ICRC, Lodz, (2009). [2] Z. Cao., LHAASO Coll., CPC 34(2) (2010) 249-252. [3] Z. Cao., LHAASO Coll., Frascati Physics Series Vol. 58(2014). [4] X. Zuo, LHAASO Coll., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 789 (2015) 143-149. [5] Xinhua. Ma et al., LHAASO Coll., Astroparticle Physics 54 (2014) 86-92. [6] J. W. Cronin, Nucl. Phys. B(Proc. Suppl), 2005, 138, 465. [7] M. A. K. Glasmacher, Astropart. Phys. 1999, 12, 1. [8] J. Zabierowski et al., KASCADE-Grande Coll., Proc. of 30th ICRC, Merida (2007), vol. 4: 111-114. [9] W. D. Apel. et al., Astropart. Phys., 2011(34): 476-485. [10] J.C. Arteaga et al., Proc. 33st ICRC, RIO DE JANEIRO, 2013, astroph.he, arxiv:1308.3202v1. [11] V. Souza et al., Proc. of the 32nd ICRC, Beijing (2011), ID 0953. 8