Theory of linear gravity waves April 1987

Similar documents
196 7 atmospheric oscillations:

The Evolution of Large-Amplitude Internal Gravity Wavepackets

Chapter 4. Gravity Waves in Shear. 4.1 Non-rotating shear flow

Goals of this Chapter

Prototype Instabilities

10 Shallow Water Models

Dynamic Meteorology (lecture 13, 2016)

Symmetric Instability and Rossby Waves

ROSSBY WAVE PROPAGATION

PHYS 432 Physics of Fluids: Instabilities

( ) where the phase! is given by! = kx + mz!"t. We also know

9 Rossby Waves. 9.1 Non-divergent barotropic vorticity equation. CSU ATS601 Fall (Holton Chapter 7, Vallis Chapter 5)

ESCI 485 Air/Sea Interaction Lesson 1 Stresses and Fluxes Dr. DeCaria

Non-local Momentum Transport Parameterizations. Joe Tribbia NCAR.ESSL.CGD.AMP

1/27/2010. With this method, all filed variables are separated into. from the basic state: Assumptions 1: : the basic state variables must

Weakly Nonlinear Non-Boussinesq Internal Gravity Wavepackets

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS WAVES IN THE OCEANS. Wolfgang Fennel Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde (IOW) an der Universität Rostock,Germany

INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES

2 The incompressible Kelvin-Helmholtz instability

1/18/2011. Conservation of Momentum Conservation of Mass Conservation of Energy Scaling Analysis ESS227 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu

ESCI 343 Atmospheric Dynamics II Lesson 11 - Rossby Waves

Momentum ux due to trapped lee waves forced by mountains

Gravity Waves. Lecture 5: Waves in Atmosphere. Waves in the Atmosphere and Oceans. Internal Gravity (Buoyancy) Waves 2/9/2017

v t + fu = 1 p y w t = 1 p z g u x + v y + w

Figure 1. adiabatically. The change in pressure experienced by the parcel is. dp = -ρ o gξ

Eliassen-Palm Theory

A Method of Specifying the Gravity Wave Spectrum above Convection Based on Latent Heating Properties and Background Wind

Dynamics and Kinematics

Geophysics Fluid Dynamics (ESS228)

Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Waves in Fluids

M.Sc. in Meteorology. Physical Meteorology Prof Peter Lynch. Mathematical Computation Laboratory Dept. of Maths. Physics, UCD, Belfield.

Conservation of Mass Conservation of Energy Scaling Analysis. ESS227 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu

In two-dimensional barotropic flow, there is an exact relationship between mass

Chapter 3. Stability theory for zonal flows :formulation

Lecture #3: Gravity Waves in GCMs. Charles McLandress (Banff Summer School 7-13 May 2005)

Lecture 3. Turbulent fluxes and TKE budgets (Garratt, Ch 2)

Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Published online: 14 May 2014.

A non-hydrostatic and compressible 2-D model simulation of Internal Gravity Waves generated by convection

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research. Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document.

The dynamics of a simple troposphere-stratosphere model

CHAPTER 19. Fluid Instabilities. In this Chapter we discuss the following instabilities:

3. Midlatitude Storm Tracks and the North Atlantic Oscillation

Mixing Efficiency of Inertia-Gravity Wave Breaking: an oceanographic perspective

Numerical Simulation of Atmospheric Internal Waves with Time-Dependent Critical Levels and Turning Points

6 Two-layer shallow water theory.

2.5 Shallow water equations, quasigeostrophic filtering, and filtering of inertia-gravity waves

The Effect of Wind Shear and Curvature on the Gravity Wave Drag Produced by a Ridge

Flows Induced by 1D, 2D and 3D Internal Gravity Wavepackets

PAPER 345 ENVIRONMENTAL FLUID DYNAMICS

Oliver Bühler Waves and Vortices

Figure 1: Surface waves

Floquet Theory for Internal Gravity Waves in a Density-Stratified Fluid. Yuanxun Bill Bao Senior Supervisor: Professor David J. Muraki August 3, 2012

The atmospheric boundary layer: Where the atmosphere meets the surface. The atmospheric boundary layer:

Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit

Chapter 2. The continuous equations

Influence of Gravity Waves on the Atmospheric Climate

CHAPTER 5. RUDIMENTS OF HYDRODYNAMIC INSTABILITY

Intuitive Introduction To Acoustic-gravity Waves

The Stable Boundary layer

1 I-campus project School-wide Program on Fluid Mechanics Modules on Waves in fluids T. R. Akylas & C. C. Mei CHAPTER SEVEN INTERNAL WAVES IN A STRATI

Donald Slinn, Murray D. Levine

Chapter 9. Geostrophy, Quasi-Geostrophy and the Potential Vorticity Equation

Dynamic Meteorology (lecture 9, 2014)

The Euler Equation of Gas-Dynamics

The Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The Surface Energy Balance (9.2)

Boundary Layer Impact on Mountain Waves across Western Ghats of India

Transient, Linear Dynamics of a Stably Stratified Shear Flow with Thermal Forcing and a Critical Level

Convection and buoyancy oscillation

Chapter 7. Linear Internal Waves. 7.1 Linearized Equations. 7.2 Linear Vertical Velocity Equation

On the propagation of atmospheric gravity waves in a non-uniform wind field: Introducing a modified acoustic-gravity wave equation

SYNOPTIC RESPONSES TO BREAKING MOUNTAIN GRAVITY WAVES MOMENTUM DEPOSIT AT TURNING CRITICAL LEVELS. 2 Model

( u,v). For simplicity, the density is considered to be a constant, denoted by ρ 0

Physical Processes in Acoustic Wave Heating of the Thermosphere

Chapter 5. Shallow Water Equations. 5.1 Derivation of shallow water equations

Lecture: Wave-induced Momentum Fluxes: Radiation Stresses

Dynamic Meteorology: lecture 2

Internal Wave Generation and Scattering from Rough Topography

Resonant excitation of trapped coastal waves by free inertia-gravity waves

8 Baroclinic Instability

Anomalous solar heating dependence of Venus s cloud-level convection

Measurement of Rotation. Circulation. Example. Lecture 4: Circulation and Vorticity 1/31/2017

ANALYSIS AND MODELING OF STRATOSPHERIC GRAVITY WAVE ACTIVITY ALONG ER-2 FLIGHT TRACKS

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. Comments on The Roles of the Horizontal Component of the Earth s Angular Velocity in Nonhydrostatic Linear Models

BALANCED FLOW: EXAMPLES (PHH lecture 3) Potential Vorticity in the real atmosphere. Potential temperature θ. Rossby Ertel potential vorticity

OPAC102. The Acoustic Wave Equation

Internal wave excitation from stratified flow over a thin barrier

5. Two-layer Flows in Rotating Channels.

2. Baroclinic Instability and Midlatitude Dynamics

Stochastic methods for representing atmospheric model uncertainties in ECMWF's IFS model

Kelvin Helmholtz Instability

ESCI 485 Air/sea Interaction Lesson 2 Turbulence Dr. DeCaria

The equation we worked with for waves and geostrophic adjustment of a 1-layer fluid is η tt

Stratified Shear Flow: Instability and Wave Radiation

Chapter 1. Governing Equations of GFD. 1.1 Mass continuity

An unambiguous definition of the Froude number for lee waves in the deep ocean

MODEL TYPE (Adapted from COMET online NWP modules) 1. Introduction

An experimental investigation of evanescent wave propagation through a turning depth

Lecture 3: Convective Heat Transfer I

Numerical and laboratory generation of internal waves from turbulence

Sound Generation from Vortex Sheet Instability

Transcription:

April 1987 By Tim Palmer European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Table of contents 1. Simple properties of internal gravity waves 2. Gravity-wave drag REFERENCES 1. SIMPLE PROPERTIES OF INTERNAL GRAVITY WAVES In order to prepare for a description of the parametrization of gravity-wave drag, we discuss in this lecture some simple properties of internal gravity waves excited by two-dimensional stably stratified flow over orography. We suppose that the horizontal scale of these waves is sufficiently small that the Rossby number is equations of motion can be written as u ----- u u ----- w u 1 + + ----- + -- p ----- t z ρ w ------ u------ w w w 1 + + ------ + -- p ----- + g t z ρ z «1, and the (1) (2) with the continuity and thermodynamic equations given by u ----- 1 + -- ---- ( ρw) ρ z θ ----- + u θ ----- + w θ ----- t z (3) (4) In the following we shall use the Boussinesq approximation (see e. g. Holton, 1979) whereby density is treated as a constant except where it is coupled to gravity in the buoyancy term of the vertical momentum equation. Linearising (1) (4) about a uniform hydrostatic flow u with constant density ρ and static stability we have for the perturbation variables N 2 g dlnθ --------------------- ( z) dz u u 1 ------- + u t ------- + ---- p ------- ρ (5) ECMWF, 24 1

w w 1 -------- u t -------- ---- p ρ + + ------- ----g z ρ u ------- ρ w + -------- z θ θ ------- + u t ------- + w θ ----- z (6) (7) (8) For these wave motions the Mach number is sufficiently small that density fluctuations due to pressure changes are small compared with those due to temperature changes, so we can write ρ ---- ρ θ ---- θ (9) Using (9), (5) (8) are four equations in four unknowns. After some straightforward manipulation these can be reduced to one equation ---- + u t ----- 2 2 w 2 w ---------- + ---------- 2 z 2 N 2 2 w + ---------- 2 (1) in the one unknown w. We now look for sinusoidal solutions of the general form exp[ i( kx + mz σt) ] which, when substituted into (1), give the dispersion relation ( σ u k) 2 ( k 2 + m 2 ) N 2 k 2 or σˆ σ u k Nk ±---------------------, (11) k 2 + m 2 where σˆ is the intrinsic frequency. Notice that it is only possible to have vertically propagating wave-like solutions (i.e. with real m ) provided that A simple calculation reveals that downward phase propagation in a frame moving with the fluid, implies upward group velocity (exercise for the student!). Let us now restrict ourselves to stationary ( σ ) waves forced by sinusoidal orography with elevation hx ( ) given by The linearised lower boundary condition is N 2 σˆ 2 > h h m sinkx 2 ECMWF, 24

w z h u ----- u kh m coskx (12) (b) Figure 1. The motion produced by uniform flow of a uniformly stratified fluid over sinusoidal topography of small amplitude. The sinuous lines indicate the displacement of isopycnal surfaces whose equilibrium configurations are horizontal, and the straight lines join crests and troughs. (a) For small-wavelength topography, i.e., wave-number k > N U, where N is the buoyancy frequency and U is a fluid velocity relative to the ground (a typical value of U N for the atmosphere is 1 km). The drawing is for ku 1.25N. Note the decay of amplitude with height, showing that energy is trapped near the ground. H and L indicate positions of maximum and minimum pressure perturbation, respectively, i.e., there is suction over crests. When the lower half plane is fluid, this can lead to instability (Kelvin Helmholtz) when the relative velocity between fluids is great enough for the suction to overcome gravity. (b) The response to large-wavelength topography, i.e, k< N U (the drawing is for ku.8n ). Now the displacement of isopycnals is uniform with height, but wave crests move upstream with height, i.e. phase lines are tilted as shown. The group velocity relative to the air is along these phase lines, but the group velocity relative to the ground is at right angles, i.e. upward and in the downstream direction. High and low pressures are now at the nodes, so there is a net force on the topography in the direction of flow. 2. GRAVITY-WAVE DRAG Let us consider two cases ECMWF, 24 3

(i) k > N u (evanescent solutions) see Fig. 1 (a) Solutions periodic in x are of the form w real{ e ikx ( Ae mz + Be mz )} The boundary condition (12), together with a finite amplitude condition ( B ), gives w u kh m e mz coskx, where m k 2 ---- N 2 u 1 2 From the continuity equation, u u h m m e mz sinkx Hence, these evanescent solutions take the form of a sinusoidal wave field decaying without phase tilt. Notice that the vertical flux of horizontal momentum ρ u w for these waves. Here the overbar represents an average along the x -direction. If we take u 1 m s 1 and N 1 s 1, then with k 2π L these evanescent solutions occur when L 6 km (ii) k < N u (propagating solutions) - see Fig. 1 (b). The vertical wavenumber is real and solutions will be of the form i ( kx + mz ) Be i( kx mz) w real{ Ae + } The constants A and B can be determined firstly by the lower boundary condition (12), and secondly by the condition that energy is propagating upwards. This latter condition implies that the vertical group velocity σ ------ m σ mku ±----------------- m 2 + k 2 is positive i.e. we must take the positive solution Ae i( kx + mz) The full solution, then, is w u kh m cos( kx + mz) u u mh m cos( kx + mz) and the horizontally averaged momentum flux 4 ECMWF, 24

ρ u w 1 --u 2 2 2 ρ kmh m For long (hydrostatic) waves with k 2 «m 2 the dispersion relationship simplifies to m N ---- u and so ρ u w 1 2 --u 2 ρ knh m (13) The pressure drag on the orography (per wavelength) is given by D 2π k 2π k p ( x, h) h ----- dx p ( x, ) h ----- dx in linearised form. Using the lower boundary condition and the x -component of the momentum equation, this can be re-expressed as 2π k D ρ u w z d so that the drag force per unit length is given by x For the evanescent modes the drag force is zero, for the propagating modes it is not. For these latter modes the mean flow experiences this drag force where the wave activity is dissipative, which can be well above the boundary layer, for example. A prime region for such wave dissipation is in vertical layers where wave breaking due to convective or shear instability is occurring. This can occur because, in the real atmosphere, ρ is not constant but decreases exponentially with height. In order that the wave momentum flux ρ u w be constant, wave amplitudes must increase as ρ with height (the whiplash 1 effect). Using the hydrostatic dispersion relationship Dk ------ ρ 2π u w N m ---- u the wave's impact on the local static stability and vertical shear can be written as ECMWF, 24 5

N 2 total N 2 Nδh 1 --------- + cosφ u (14) η total η 1 Ri 1 2 Nδh --------- + cosφ u (15) where δh is the amplitude of the displacement of an isentropic surface, φ the wave phase, η U z, and Ri N 2 η 2 is the Richardson number. The subscript 'total' refers to the sum of the wave and background flow contributions. We can see from this that, when δh u N, then N total is reduced to zero at ϕ π. Convective overturning 1 2 will occur and wave activity dissipated. Note that, if δh ρ δh, then wave dissipation (wave-breaking) of this sort is always likely to occur in the upper atmosphere (with u 1 m s 1 and N 1 2 s 1, δh 1 m ). Fig. 2 shows an observed momentum flux profile ( Lilly and Kennedy, 1973) which appears to confirm this. Figure 2. Mean observed profile of momentum flux over the Rocky mountains on 17th February 197 as measured from aircraft (from Lilly and Kennedy, 1973). 6 ECMWF, 24

REFERENCES Holton, J.R., 1979: An introduction to dynamic meteorology. Int.Geophys.Series, Vo1.23. Ac. Press, 391pp. Lilly D. K. and Kennedy 1973 J. Atmos. Sci, 3, 1135 1152 ECMWF, 24 7