Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Similar documents
A Two-Stage Bunch Compressor Option for the US Cold LC

X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Study of Alternative Optics for the NLC Prelinac Collimation section

LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations

CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results

ILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

IP switch and big bend

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Transverse Field Profile of the NLC Damping Rings Electromagnet Wiggler

SPPS: The SLAC Linac Bunch Compressor and Its Relevance to LCLS

A Bunch Compressor for the CLIC Main Beam

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Chromatic Corrections for the LCLS-II Electron Transport Lines

SBF Accelerator Principles

The Electron-Ion Collider

Parameter selection and longitudinal phase space simulation for a single stage X-band FEL driver at 250 MeV

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012

Status of linear collider designs:

Low slice emittance preservation during bunch compression

S2E (Start-to-End) Simulations for PAL-FEL. Eun-San Kim

PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL

Design, Parameters, and Tolerances for the LCLS First Bunch Compressor Chicane, BC1

Emittance preservation in TESLA

Beam Dynamics. Gennady Stupakov. DOE High Energy Physics Review June 2-4, 2004

Monochromatization Option for NLC Collisions

LOLA: Past, present and future operation

Introduction to particle accelerators

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Simple limits on achieving a quasi-linear magnetic compression for an FEL driver

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC

{ } Double Bend Achromat Arc Optics for 12 GeV CEBAF. Alex Bogacz. Abstract. 1. Dispersion s Emittance H. H γ JLAB-TN

LHeC Recirculator with Energy Recovery Beam Optics Choices

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

OPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM

CEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

CSR calculation by paraxial approximation

Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase

FACET-II Design Update

Simulation for choice of RF phase and RF jitters in the main linac

EFFECTS OF RF DEFLECTIONS ON BEAM DYNAMICS IN LINEAR COLLIDERS*

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Feasibility Study of Accumulator and Compressor for the 6-bunches SPL based Proton Driver

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Coherent synchrotron radiation in magnetic bunch compressors. Qiang Gao, ZhaoHeng Guo, Alysson Vrielink

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC

Pros and Cons of the Acceleration Scheme (NF-IDS)

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Requirements & Studies for CLIC

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Note. Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions

On behalf of: F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y. Papaphilippou (CERN), N. Milas, A. Streun (PSI/SLS), M. Pivi (SLAC), T.

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

parameter symbol value beam energy E 15 GeV transverse rms beam size x;y 25 m rms bunch length z 20 m charge per bunch Q b 1nC electrons per bunch N b

Wakefield Effects of Collimators in LCLS-II

Design of a Dipole with Longitudinally Variable Field using Permanent Magnets for CLIC DRs

Bunch Compressor for the TESLA Linear Collider

LCLS-II Beam Stay-Clear

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

II) Experimental Design

ATTOSECOND X-RAY PULSES IN THE LCLS USING THE SLOTTED FOIL METHOD

Estimates of Power Radiated by the Beam in Bends of LCLS-II

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

UCLA Neptune Ramped Bunch Experiment. R. Joel England UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy Particle Beam Physics Laboratory May 19, 2004

Analysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1

Synchrotron Based Proton Drivers

Simulation of Laser-Compton cooling of electron beams for future linear colliders. Abstract

Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations

Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing. F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

A Transverse RF Deflecting Structure for Bunch Length and Phase Space Diagnostics

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Low Emittance Machines

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

SABER Optics. Y. Nosochkov, K. Bane, P. Emma, R. Erickson. SABER Workshop, SLAC, March 15-16, /25

Femtosecond and sub-femtosecond x-ray pulses from a SASE-based free-electron laser. Abstract

Collider Rings and IR Design for MEIC

Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Femtosecond Width X-ray Generation with the SLAC Linac and the FFTB Beamline *

NEXT GENERATION B-FACTORIES

Evaluating the Emittance Increase Due to the RF Coupler Fields

Transcription:

LCC 0035 07/01/00 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes More Options for the NLC Bunch Compressors January 7, 2000 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA Abstract: The present bunch compressor design for the NLC allows control of the final bunch length by way of changes to the horizontal betatron phase advance of the 180ƒ-turnaround arc. This adjustability requirement significantly constrains the design and cost optimization of the system and excludes the possibility of using permanent-magnet quadrupoles in the arc. To relieve this constraint, and to avoid the very strong arc focussing required at the upper limits of the bunch length range, we explore an option of bunch length control using the first compressor stage, with the arc optics fixed.

More Options for the NLC Bunch Compressors P. Emma SLAC October 4, 1999 ABSTRACT The present bunch compressor design for the NLC allows control of the final bunch length by way of changes to the horizontal betatron phase advance of the 180 -turnaround arc. This adjustability requirement significantly constrains the design and cost optimization of the system and excludes the possibility of using permanent magnet quadrupoles in the arc. To relieve this constraint, and to avoid the very strong arc focussing required at the upper limits of the bunch length range, we explore an option of bunch length control using the first compressor stage, with the arc optics fixed. +

1 Introduction The rms bunch length in the main linac of the NLC needs to be adjustable, for the various operating modes, over a range of 90-145 µm (associated with bunch populations of 0.75-1.1 10 10 ppb, respectively). In previous designs [1] [2], this adjustability is accomplished by changing the horizontal betatron phase advance per cell of the BC2 180 -turnaround arc (µ x 90-135 /cell). Such a scenario requires variable gradient quadrupole magnets in the arc, a lower than optimal phase advance per cell for the 90-µm bunch length, and more FODO-cells in the arc design than minimally necessary. An alternate design of the compressor systems (briefly discussed in reference [2]) would allow the bunch length variation to be accomplished in the first compressor stage (the BC1 wiggler) while leaving the second stage (the arc) fixed. This alternate scenario allows the relatively expensive arc systems to be further cost minimized at a single operating point. In addition, permanent magnet quadrupoles may then be employed in the arc. This option is described in what follows. 2 First Stage Compressor To provide adjustability of the main linac bunch length, σ z3, using the first compressor stage, its L-band voltage (V G 1 L 1 ) and wiggler momentum compaction (R 56 a 1 ) need to both be variable. The value of a 1 can be adjusted simply by scaling the dipole fields in the wiggler while allowing adequate horizontal vacuum chamber in the dipoles. The necessary range, calculated using reference [2], is a 1 = -0.48 to -0.75 m. The voltage range required is 140 to 90 MV (σ z3 = 90 to 145 µm, respectively). Since a 1 scales with the square-root of the peak wiggler dispersion (? 30 cm at a 1 = -0.48 m), the vacuum chambers in the wiggler dipoles need to allow additional width,? x, for the horizontal beam translation given by 0.75 m x η 1 7.5 cm 0.48 m. (1) This implies that the width of the vacuum chambers in the wiggler dipoles must be large enough to accommodate ten times the full width beam size (2 10?σ d1 6.0 cm) as well as the maximum beam translation, or approximately 14 cm full width. The dipole field quality also needs to be quite flat (<0.05 %) over this range. Table 1 lists the BC1 parameters for the 90-µm and the 145-µm main linac bunch length cases. These parameters are computed for a gaussian damping ring beam with a 5-mm rms bunch length and 0.1-% rms energy spread at 1.98 GeV.

Table 1. Summary of 1 st compressor parameters for the 90-µm and the 145-µm main linac bunch length. parameter symbol 90 µm 145 µm unit Single bunch population N 0.75 1.10 10 10 Bunch length after 1 st -compressor (rms) s z1 500 760 µm Energy spread after 1 st -compressor (rms) s d1 1.04 0.67 % Voltage of L-band section (gradient length) G 1 L 1 139 89 MV RF phase * of L-band section f 1-101.8-97.7 deg Energy after 1 st -compressor stage E 1 1.95 1.96 GeV Momentum compaction of wiggler a 1-0.48-0.75 m Peak dispersion in wiggler dipoles? 30 38 cm Energy spread after pre-linac (rms) s d2 0.26 0.17 % * Accelerating crest at 0, but zero-crossing at -90 where bunch-head energy < tail energy 3 Pre-Linac The S-band pre-linac follows the wiggler and accelerates the beam to 8 GeV where it enters the arc. For the 145-µm case, the bunch length in the pre-linac must be increased to 760 µm. The longer bunch tightens the S-band rf structure transverse alignment tolerances by a factor of ~2. But the reduced energy spread above will also loosen quadrupole alignment tolerances at the low-energy end, which, according to reference [1], dominates the emittance dilution for a 500-µm bunch length. In addition, the study in reference [2] has reduced the pre-linac length by 25% which already slightly loosens the structure alignment tolerances with respect to reference [1]. Therefore, the longer bunch in the pre-linac needs to be studied, but does not seem to present a major problem. The smaller energy spread after the wiggler, in the 145-µm case, also produces a smaller energy spread in the arc (from 0.26 % to 0.17 % rms). This, by itself, loosens arc quadrupole alignment tolerances by 35% and reduces electron depolarization in the arc from 1.1 % to 0.5 %. 4 Second-Stage Compressor The changes for BC2, using bunch length control in BC1, are summed up in Table 2. Since the emittance growth due to incoherent synchrotron radiation is minimized at higher phase advance (~135 /cell), the arc is reduced in length, number of components, and cost, by a design which moves in this direction. In fact, the emittance growth is a weak function beyond 108 /cell [3]. A compromise at 108, rather than an unnecessary 135, eases quadrupole alignment tolerances in the arc. The right side of Table 2 is therefore computed for 108 /cell.

With this new scenario the number of FODO-cells in the arc is reduced from 53 to 44, the arc length is slightly reduced, and quadrupole magnets are shorter. In addition, it is now possible to use permanent magnets for the quadrupoles as well as the bends. Finally, a phase advance per cell in the arc of 132.7 [2] is no longer necessary for the 145-µm bunch length case, where this very strong focusing produces unnecessarily tight quadrupole alignment tolerances over the arc. A phase advance per cell of 108 reduces the alignment tolerances by ~25%. For the 145-µm bunch length, the reduced arc energy spread, in conjunction with the weaker quadrupoles, loosens the alignment tolerances by a factor of two. The chicane design is not changed by the new option, but its strength no longer needs to be adjustable. Table 2. Summary of 2 nd compressor parameters for a 90-µm main linac bunch length in the case where the BC2-arc phase advance is adjustable, and the case where the BC2-arc is fixed at 108 /cell. A 4-% relative horizontal emittance growth across the arc is allowed due to incoherent synchrotron radiation. parameter symbol adjustable fixed unit Momentum compaction of arc a 2 0.24 0.24 m Number of arc cells N c 53 44 Length of arc (including?-suppressors) L a 165 155 m Hor. phase advance per cell in arc µ x 90 108 deg/cell Length of bend magnets L Ba 0.8 1.0 m Dipole field of bend magnets B B 9.7 9.3 kg Quadrupole magnet length L Q 26 20 cm Quadrupole magnet pole-tip radius r Q 6 6 mm Max. pole-tip field of quadrupoles B Q 8.1 7.7 kg 5 System Stability The sensitivity of the compressor system to variations in the extracted phase from the damping rings is a major concern. Much of the attention in the design has been focused on the sensitivity of the interaction point (IP) energy with respect to phase jitter at damping ring extraction [1] [2]. A sensitivity of <0.1% IP relative energy change per 21 -S-band DR phase change has been achieved. Detailed simulations using this new option, where the BC2 arc is fixed and the BC1 is adjustable, have been run which demonstrate this same low sensitivity, and better, are still attainable. The longitudinal wakefields (L-band, S-band and X-band), rf curvature and 2 nd and 3 rd order momentum compaction are all included in the runs. Fig. 1 shows the results.

Fig. 1. At the interaction point, the variation of mean energy (top-left), rms energy spread (top-right), rms bunch length (bottom-left), and mean longitudinal bunch position with respect to IP location (bottom-right), versus initial phase error,? z 0, at damping ring extraction (±6 mm ±21 S-band). 6 Conclusions The variable bunch length in the NLC main linac can be accomplished by adjusting the second-stage of compression (the arc) or by adjusting the first-stage of compression (the wiggler). The second option has advantages over the first in that arc is then fixed and its design can be further cost optimized. In addition, the very strong focusing in the arc for the 145-µm bunch length is no longer required, which significantly eases emittance dilution effects. The arc may then be composed of permanent magnets for a reduced cost. The negative impact for the adjustable-bc1 is the tighter alignment tolerances of the pre-linac rf structures due to the longer bunch there. This does not appear to be an outstanding issue in the context of the other performance improvements discussed here. 7 References [1] Zeroth-order Design Report for the Next Linear Collider, SLAC-REP-474, May 1996. [2] P. Emma, Cost and Performance Optimization of the NLC Bunch Compressor Systems, LCC-0021, Aug. 1999. [3] R.H. Helm, H. Wiedemann, Emittance Dilution in a FODO-Cell Lattice, PEP-303, May 1979.