Emmy Noether, Symmetry, and Women in Mathematics

Similar documents
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d

A Brief History of Ring Theory. by Kristen Pollock Abstract Algebra II, Math 442 Loyola College, Spring 2005

Extended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f Artin-Rees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA MAT6608. References

International Mathematical Union

4.4 Noetherian Rings

32 Divisibility Theory in Integral Domains

Lecture 7.4: Divisibility and factorization

Example: This theorem is the easiest way to test an ideal (or an element) is prime. Z[x] (x)

Factorizations of ideals in noncommutative rings similar to factorizations of ideals in commutative Dedekind domains

Structure of rings. Chapter Algebras

Chapter 14: Divisibility and factorization

ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL

THE REGULAR ELEMENT PROPERTY

TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY

Sequences of height 1 primes in Z[X]

Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry. Robert Friedman

1. Group Theory Permutations.

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Stat 451: Solutions to Assignment #1

Lecture 7: Polynomial rings

M3P14 LECTURE NOTES 8: QUADRATIC RINGS AND EUCLIDEAN DOMAINS

However another possibility is


Universal Localization of Piecewise Noetherian Rings

Universal localization at semiprime Goldie ideals

Lecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).

Fundamental theorem of modules over a PID and applications

Recall, R is an integral domain provided: R is a commutative ring If ab = 0 in R, then either a = 0 or b = 0.

Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra

Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman

Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008

Groups, graphs and magic

ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS

Commutative Algebra MAS439 Lecture 3: Subrings

1. Factorization Divisibility in Z.

I. Duality. Macaulay F. S., The Algebraic Theory of Modular Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press (1916);

Chapter 1. Wedderburn-Artin Theory

Lecture 6.3: Polynomials and irreducibility

Ideals: Definitions & Examples

Modules Over Principal Ideal Domains

8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions

Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 6, revision 2

ALGEBRA HW 4. M 0 is an exact sequence of R-modules, then M is Noetherian if and only if M and M are.

2a 2 4ac), provided there is an element r in our

CHAPTER 3: THE INTEGERS Z

Factorization in Domains

Ring Theory Problems. A σ

Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties

SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUIS-PHILIPPE THIBAULT

The Zariski Spectrum of a ring

Factorization of integer-valued polynomials with square-free denominator

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35

ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS.

2. Prime and Maximal Ideals

Rings If R is a commutative ring, a zero divisor is a nonzero element x such that xy = 0 for some nonzero element y R.

Skew Polynomial Rings

ABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY

2 Elementary number theory

A NOTE ON SIMPLE DOMAINS OF GK DIMENSION TWO

Discrete Structures Lecture Primes and Greatest Common Divisor

MODULES OVER A PID. induces an isomorphism

AP-DOMAINS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION

0.2 Vector spaces. J.A.Beachy 1

Many of the groups with which we are familiar are arithmetical in nature, and they tend to share key structures that combine more than one operation.

Section 2: Classes of Sets

NOTES FOR COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA M5P55

Math 611 Homework 6. Paul Hacking. November 19, All rings are assumed to be commutative with 1.

MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 4: Modular arithmetic (continued). Linear congruences.

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ra] 9 Jun 2006

MODEL ANSWERS TO THE FIRST HOMEWORK

Primal, completely irreducible, and primary meet decompositions in modules

Math 547, Exam 2 Information.

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35

Piecewise Noetherian Rings

Formalizing Elementary Divisor Rings in Coq

5 Dedekind extensions

CRing Project, Chapter 5

Lecture 7.5: Euclidean domains and algebraic integers

Practice problems for first midterm, Spring 98

NIL DERIVATIONS AND CHAIN CONDITIONS IN PRIME RINGS

MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE

3 Boolean Algebra 3.1 BOOLEAN ALGEBRA

ON STRONGLY PRIME IDEALS AND STRONGLY ZERO-DIMENSIONAL RINGS. Christian Gottlieb

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

CARL FRIEDRICH GAUSS PRIZE FOR APPLICATIONS OF MATHEMATICS. First Award

* 8 Groups, with Appendix containing Rings and Fields.

Supplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.

Section III.6. Factorization in Polynomial Rings

THE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY DICTIONARY FOR BEGINNERS. Contents

Krull Dimension and Going-Down in Fixed Rings

Solutions of exercise sheet 8

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 25 Jul 2017

THE HALF-FACTORIAL PROPERTY IN INTEGRAL EXTENSIONS. Jim Coykendall Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University Fargo, ND.

DERIVATIONS. Introduction to non-associative algebra. Playing havoc with the product rule? UNIVERSITY STUDIES 4 TRANSFER SEMINAR

School of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information

Gordans Finiteness Theorem (Hilberts proof slightly modernized)

Transcription:

Emmy Noether, Symmetry, and Women in Mathematics Cheryl E Praeger Centre for the Mathematics of Symmetry and Computation LMS-IMA Joint Meeting, London, September 2018 Noether Celebration

Emmy Noether s amazing contributions to algebra Nathan Jacobson [edited collected papers of Emmy Noether] Development of modern abstract algebra is largely due to Emmy Noether One of the most distinctive innovations of 20 th century mathematics Through published papers, lectures, personal influence Contributions so thoroughly absorbed into math culture That they are rarely specifically attributed to her

Ideal Theory in Rings Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen Math. Annalen 83 (1921), 24-66 Of fundamental importance in the development of modern algebra New concepts new framework for studying rings Decomposition/factorisation theorems general (appropriate) context So fundamental, some of her ideas rediscovered by others Name given to various algebraic structures: notably Noetherian rings

Rings Examples: Integers Z [positive and negative] Characteristics (axioms) of a ring R Addition and multiplication possible R contains zero 0 and each element a has a negative a so a + (-a) = 0 Parentheses often not needed: (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) and (a.b). c = a. (b.c) Distributive rule: (a + b). c = a.c + b.c Emmy Noether s rings were commutative: a + b = b + a and a. b = b. a As well as Z: many rings had been studied Ring of Gaussian integers a+bi with a, b in Z Polynomial rings R[x] with coefficients in a ring R Not every ring contains a 1 e.g. 2Z = { 2 x x Z}

Emmy Noether s aim in her 1921 paper To convert known decomposition theorems for Z or algebraic integers like Z[i], or polynomial rings Z[x] into theorems for ideals in arbitrary integral domains (or rings in general) Analogue of prime-power decomposition of integers r a = p 1 r 1 p 2 r 2 p s s = q 1 q 2 q s Example: 60 = 2 2 3 1 5 1 = 4 3 5 Think of q i as components of the decomposition We know: for integers decomposition essentially unique number s, the primes p i, the exponents r i Only issue is -1 discuss later Similar unique decomposition results for some rings of algebraic integers and polynomial rings. Emmy Noether: introduced general properties which could be interpreted in all these contexts and others - to get a general decomposition theorem whenever these properties held

Some characteristic properties Capture the idea of prime-power decomposition for integers In a decomposition a = q 1 q 2 q s Components q i should be pairwise coprime and q i not decomposable as product of pairwise coprime numbers (irreducible) Components q i should be primary If q i divides bc but not b then q i divides some power of c And two more properties Properties formulated to apply to any ring: q divides b means b = qc for some c E.g. 60 = 6 x 10 Or 60 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 Not allowed E.g. 60 = 4 x 3 x 5 Component 4 is primary Since if 4 divides b. c but not b, Then c even, so 4 divides c 2

Ideals: to deal with the uncertainty caused by -1 Ideal N in a ring R Definition: N subset of R such that If N contains b then N also contains a. b for arbitrary a in N If N contains b and c then N also contains b c Transfers language If N contains b then say b divisible by N If M is an ideal contained in N, then say M divisible by N E.g. N = 60Z = { 60 x x Z} Is an ideal of Z E.g. 60Z is contained in 12Z So 60Z is divisible by 12Z Definition: N is finitely generated by subset B = {b 1,, b s } if each a in N can be written as a = a 1 b 1 + + a s b s + n 1 b 1 + + n s b s [this is modern language: Emmy Noether calls B an ideal basis for N]

Ideals: to deal with the uncertainty caused by -1 Ideal N in a ring R Definition: N subset of R such that If N contains b then N also contains a. b for arbitrary a in N If N contains b and c then N also contains b c Transfers language If N contains b then say b divisible by N If M is an ideal contained in N, then say M divisible by N E.g. N = 60Z = { 60 x x Z} Is an ideal of Z E.g. 60Z is contained in 12Z So 60Z is divisible by 12Z Definition: N is finitely generated by subset B = {b 1,, b s } if each a in N can be written as a = a 1 b 1 + + a s b s + n 1 b 1 + + n s b s Finite Chain Theorem: If every ideal is finitely generated, then each infinite ascending chain of ideals terminates after a finite number of steps.

Ideals: to deal with the uncertainty caused by -1 Finite Chain Theorem: If every ideal is finitely generated, then for a countably infinite sequence of ideals such that N 1 N 2 N r there exists an integer n such that N n = N n+1 =.

Ideals: to deal with the uncertainty caused by -1 Finite Chain Theorem: If every ideal is finitely generated, then for a countably infinite sequence of ideals such that N 1 N 2 N r there exists an integer n such that N n = N n+1 =. Why does it apply to the integers Z? Each ideal M is equal to M = mz = { m x x Z} for some m Each ideal N containing M is N = nz = { n x x Z} for some n dividing m So M contained in only finitely many larger ideals E.g. 60Z 12Z 4Z 2Z

Ideals: to deal with the uncertainty caused by -1 Finite Chain Theorem: If every ideal is finitely generated, then for a countably infinite sequence of ideals such that N 1 N 2 N r there exists an integer n such that N n = N n+1 =. Why does it apply to the integers Z? Each ideal M is equal to M = mz = { m x x Z} for some m Each ideal N containing M is N = nz = { n x x Z} for some n dividing m So M contained in only finitely many larger ideals Theorem was known previously for several special cases: Context of modules Dedekind, [Supplement XI to Zahlentheorie ] Polynomial rings Lasker, 1905 E.g. 60Z 12Z 4Z 2Z Emmy Noether gives much wider-ranging applications of this theorem than previously for the special cases

Noetherian rings Finite Chain Theorem: If every ideal is finitely generated, then for a countably infinite sequence of ideals such that N 1 N 2 N r there exists an integer n such that N n = N n+1 =. Ascending chain condition (ACC) Each countably infinite ascending chain of ideals terminates after a finite number of steps. ACC defined also on chains of left ideals and chains of right ideals in noncommutative rings Definition: Ring is Noetherian if it has the ACC on left and right ideals Next Noether s applications of Finite Chain Theorem: depend on Axim of Choice

Decompositions of ideals I Least common multiple l. c. m. {N 1, N 2,, N k } of ideals is the intersection N 1 N 2 N k Example 60Z = 12Z 10Z the ideals 12Z, 10Z the components of decomposition

Decompositions of ideals I Least common multiple l. c. m. {N 1, N 2,, N k } of ideals is the intersection N 1 N 2 N k Example 60Z = 12Z 10Z the ideals 12Z, 10Z the components of decomposition Irreducible ideal: if N not the intersection (l.c.m.) of two larger ideals So 4Z is irreducible (only larger ideal is 2Z) But none of 60Z = 12Z 10Z, 12Z = 4Z 3Z, or 10Z = 2Z 5Z irreducible

Decompositions of ideals I Least common multiple l. c. m. {N 1, N 2,, N k } of ideals is the intersection N 1 N 2 N k Example 60Z = 12Z 10Z the ideals 12Z, 10Z the components of decomposition Irreducible ideal: if N not the intersection (l.c.m.) of two larger ideals So 4Z is irreducible (only larger ideal is 2Z) But none of 60Z = 12Z 10Z, 12Z = 4Z 3Z, or 10Z = 2Z 5Z irreducible Emmy s next theorem: [Theorem II] Every ideal is an intersection of finitely many irreducible ideals What about uniqueness? Always assuming: all ideals finitely generated Analogue of: every integer is a product of finitely many prime-powers

Decompositions of ideals II Suppose ideal N = N 1 N 2 N k with the N i irreducible Shortest decomposition: cannot omit any component, that is, No N i contains the intersection of the remaining ideals Example: 60Z = 4Z 3Z 2Z 5Z not shortest since 60Z = 4Z 3Z 5Z 2Z NICE decomposition: N = N 1 N 2 N k if shortest and all N i irreducible Emmy s next theorem: [Theorem IV] Any two NICE decompositions of an ideal have same number of components

Decompositions of ideals III Primary and prime ideals: two definitions (products of elements and products of ideals) shows equivalent Primary ideals contained in unique prime ideal [Theorem V] Irreducible ideals are primary [Theorem VI] Hence in NICE decomposition N = N 1 N 2 N k each N i contained in unique prime ideal P i Emmy s next theorem: [Theorem VII] Any two NICE decompositions involve exactly the same set of prime ideals Some information exponents but not uniqueness [Theorem VII] 11 pages [and five Theorems] refining the structure

Study of modules Section 9: Precursor of Emmy Noether s work on Group Rings Involves Extension of theory to non-commutative rings Introduces concept of sub-module Assuming that each submodule is finitely generated, obtains structural results which lay the foundations for uniqueness theorems Later work 1927 Noether (her letter to Brauer) I am very glad that you have now realized the connection between representation theory and the theory of noncommutative rings 1929 Noether [Math.Z.] Roquet: Her great paper on representation theory and group rings 1932 [J Reine und Angew. Math.] Brauer--Hasse--Noether Theorem on division algebras over number fields Weyl: a high watermark in the history of algebra Modules are like vector spaces, but the scalars come from a ring (not necessarily a field)

Final applications Section 10: Connection of her theorems with known work on polynomial rings Section 11: Examples from Number Theory Section 12: Example from elementary divisor theory matrix algebras It is an extraordinary paper

Hermann Weyl Her influence is not just in her papers Hermann Weyl: she had great stimulating power and many of her suggestions took shape only in the works of her pupils and co-workers.

Albert Einstein May 1, 1935 - New York Times Obituary: describes Emmy Noether as: the most significant creative mathematical genius thus far produced since the higher education of women began. In the realm of algebra, she discovered methods which have proved of enormous importance in the development of the presentday younger generation of mathematicians

Emmy Noether s legacy For Women in Mathematics. International Congresses of Mathematicians (ICM) Emmy was first in many things. 1897 First ICM - Zurich 4 women out of 208 participants No women speakers 1932 ICM again in Zurich Emmy Noether first woman to give a plenary lecture at an ICM 1990 ICM in Kyoto Karen Uhlenbeck second woman ICM plenary speaker 58 years later!

Women in Mathematics Associations Before the 1990 ICM Associations for women in mathematics formed: 1971 Association for Women in Mathematics AWM (in the US) with men and women as members 1980 AWM initiated: Emmy Noether Lecture to honour women who have made fundamental and sustained contributions to the mathematical sciences Annually at Joint Mathematics meeting in January 2013: AWM-AMS Noether lectures [co-sponsored by American Math Soc]

ICM Emmy Noether Lecture Additional AWM Emmy Noether lectures 1994 Organised by AWM presented at ICM [each four years] 2002 International Mathematical Union: General Assembly agreed to formalize the ICM Emmy Noether Lecture for following two ICMs 2010 International Mathematical Union: General Assembly established ICM Emmy Noether Lecture on-going

Women and the International Mathematical Union (IMU) 1951 IMU established IMU Executive Committee (now) 11 persons President, 2 VPs, 6 Members-at-Large and immediate past President 4 year terms 2003-2006 First time a woman on the IMU EC: Ragni Piene (Norway) Ragni chaired Emmy Noether Committee for 2006 Members at large May serve maximum of two terms Terms are four years

Women and the International Mathematical Union (IMU) 2007-2010 First time two women on IMU EC Ragni and Cheryl Praeger Cheryl chaired second ICM Emmy Noether Committee - for 2010 ICM ICM Emmy Noether Lecture established by IMU GA 2010

Women and the International Mathematical Union (IMU) 20011-2014 First woman President of IMU Ingrid Daubechies 2014 Established IMU Committee Committee for Women in Mathematics CWM And exceptionally..

Women and the International Mathematical Union (IMU) 2014 International Congress of Mathematicians in Seoul Only Woman to receive a Fields Medal - in more than 80 years! Awarded by the IMU at the ICM Up to four every four years for outstanding achievements by mathematicians under 40 First FM awarded in 1936 There s a long way to go

Emmy Noether: Trailblazer for Women in Mathematics Thank you Emmy