Prime ideals in rings of power series & polynomials

Similar documents
NON-FINITELY GENERATED PRIME IDEALS IN SUBRINGS OF POWER SERIES RINGS. William Heinzer, Christel Rotthaus and Sylvia Wiegand

Integral Domains Inside Noetherian Power Series Rings: Constructions and Examples Oct. 17, William Heinzer Christel Rotthaus Sylvia Wiegand

Integral Domains Inside Noetherian Power Series Rings: Constructions and Examples July William Heinzer Christel Rotthaus Sylvia Wiegand

Integral Closures of Ideals in Completions of Regular Local Domains

Integral Domains Inside Noetherian Power Series Rings: Constructions and Examples Aug 11, William Heinzer Christel Rotthaus Sylvia Wiegand

PRIME IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL POLYNOMIAL RINGS

EXAMPLES OF INTEGRAL DOMAINS INSIDE POWER SERIES RINGS. William Heinzer, Christel Rotthaus and Sylvia Wiegand

PRIME IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL NOETHERIAN DOMAINS AND FIBER PRODUCTS AND CONNECTED SUMS

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

MATH 690 NOTES. 1. Associated graded rings

Power Series Over Noetherian Rings May 10, William Heinzer Christel Rotthaus Sylvia Wiegand

Krull Dimension and Going-Down in Fixed Rings

ZERO-DIMENSIONALITY AND SERRE RINGS. D. Karim

Bachelorarbeit. Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades. Bachelor of Science. Dimension theory for commutative rings. Universität Regensburg

8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions

ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS

m-full AND BASICALLY FULL IDEALS IN RINGS OF CHARACTERISTIC p

Math 611 Homework 6. Paul Hacking. November 19, All rings are assumed to be commutative with 1.

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry

Primary Decompositions of Powers of Ideals. Irena Swanson

MAS 6396 Algebraic Curves Spring Semester 2016 Notes based on Algebraic Curves by Fulton. Timothy J. Ford April 4, 2016

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CONTENTS

Selected Math 553 Homework Solutions

EXCELLENT RINGS WITH SINGLETON FORMAL FIBERS. 1. Introduction. Although this paper focuses on a commutative algebra result, we shall begin by

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Spectra of rings differentially finitely generated over a subring

Characterizing integral domains by semigroups of ideals

Commutative Algebra. Contents. B Totaro. Michaelmas Basics Rings & homomorphisms Modules Prime & maximal ideals...

Sequences of height 1 primes in Z[X]

Introduction Non-uniqueness of factorization in A[x]... 66

m-full AND BASICALLY FULL IDEALS IN RINGS OF CHARACTERISTIC p

Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.

Commutative Algebra. B Totaro. Michaelmas Basics Rings & homomorphisms Modules Prime & maximal ideals...

Characterizations and constructions of h-local domains

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

Algebraic Geometry I Lectures 22 and 23

Maximal Chains of Prime Ideals of Different Lengths in Unique Factorization Domains

6]. (10) (i) Determine the units in the rings Z[i] and Z[ 10]. If n is a squarefree

Gorenstein modules, finite index, and finite Cohen Macaulay type

Assigned homework problems S. L. Kleiman, fall 2008

Local Generic Formal Fibers of Excellent Rings

Factorization in Integral Domains II

Commutative Algebra. Instructor: Graham Leuschke & Typist: Caleb McWhorter. Spring 2016

Math 711: Lecture of September 7, Symbolic powers

Here is another way to understand what a scheme is 1.GivenaschemeX, and a commutative ring R, the set of R-valued points

Polynomial Rings. i=0. i=0. n+m. i=0. k=0

LECTURE 4: GOING-DOWN THEOREM AND NORMAL RINGS

be any ring homomorphism and let s S be any element of S. Then there is a unique ring homomorphism

Homework 8 Solutions to Selected Problems

fwerg^ fmb "Liberty and Union Ono and lusoparablc."

Commutative Algebra I

SCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, February-March 2005

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

Skew Polynomial Rings

COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY. John A. Beachy and William D.

Advanced Algebra II. Mar. 2, 2007 (Fri.) 1. commutative ring theory In this chapter, rings are assume to be commutative with identity.

Resolution of Singularities. Steven Dale Cutkosky. Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar

Lecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).

where c R and the content of f is one. 1

IDEAL THEORY IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL REGULAR LOCAL DOMAINS AND BIRATIONAL EXTENSIONS. William Heinzer and David Lantz

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

1. Group Theory Permutations.

214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN

ON STRONGLY PRIME IDEALS AND STRONGLY ZERO-DIMENSIONAL RINGS. Christian Gottlieb

Multiple Structures with Arbitrarily Large Projective Dimension

NOETHERIAN SPACES OF INTEGRALLY CLOSED RINGS WITH AN APPLICATION TO INTERSECTIONS OF VALUATION RINGS

DOUGLAS J. DAILEY AND THOMAS MARLEY

The Proj Construction

ON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF Hilb n k[x] (x) Roy Mikael Skjelnes

x 9 or x > 10 Name: Class: Date: 1 How many natural numbers are between 1.5 and 4.5 on the number line?

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

COMMUTATIVE IDEAL THEORY WITHOUT FINITENESS CONDITIONS: PRIMAL IDEALS

MATH 431 PART 2: POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND FACTORIZATION

Generators of certain inner mapping groups

Math 203A - Solution Set 1

Decompositions Of Modules And Matrices

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 508, WINTER QUARTER 2017: ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA

MINKOWSKI THEORY AND THE CLASS NUMBER

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY. Throughout these notes all rings will be commutative with identity. k will be an algebraically

Homological Methods in Commutative Algebra

SOLUTIONS TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY AND ARITHMETIC CURVES BY QING LIU. I will collect my solutions to some of the exercises in this book in this document.

Chapter II The Left Spectrum and Irreducible Representations of Small Quantized and Classical Rings. Introduction

Ring Theory Problems. A σ

Polynomial Rings. (Last Updated: December 8, 2017)

Factorization in Polynomial Rings

Factorization in Domains

Homework 2 - Math 603 Fall 05 Solutions

COFINITENESS AND ASSOCIATED PRIMES OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES

THE DIMENSION OF A SUBCATEGORY OF MODULES

(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i

Two theorems about maximal Cohen Macaulay modules

DESCENT OF THE CANONICAL MODULE IN RINGS WITH THE APPROXIMATION PROPERTY

INERTIA GROUPS AND FIBERS

Part IX. Factorization

Lecture 4. Corollary 1.2. If the set of all nonunits is an ideal in A, then A is local and this ideal is the maximal one.

INFINITE RINGS WITH PLANAR ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS

Transcription:

Prime ideals in rings of power series & polynomials Sylvia Wiegand (work of W. Heinzer, C. Rotthaus, SW & E. Celikbas, C. Eubanks-Turner, SW) Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Lincoln Tehran, 2016

Intro, history: For R a commutative ring, Spec(R) := {prime ideals of R}, a partially ordered set under.

Intro, history: For R a commutative ring, Spec(R) := {prime ideals of R}, a partially ordered set under. Questions. Question 1 1950, I. Kaplansky: What is Spec(R) for a Noetherian ring R? i.e. Which posets occur? [Work of Nagata 50s; Hochster 69; Lewis and Ohm 71(?), McAdam 77, Heitmann 77, 79; Ratliff 60s-70s]

Intro, history: For R a commutative ring, Spec(R) := {prime ideals of R}, a partially ordered set under. Questions. Question 1 1950, I. Kaplansky: What is Spec(R) for a Noetherian ring R? i.e. Which posets occur? [Work of Nagata 50s; Hochster 69; Lewis and Ohm 71(?), McAdam 77, Heitmann 77, 79; Ratliff 60s-70s] Question 2 What is Spec(R) for a two-dimensional Noetherian domain R? What is Spec(R) for a particular ring R? Question 3 What is Spec(R) for a two-dimensional Noetherian polynomial ring R? Or a ring of power series? Or homomorphic image of a ring of polynomials and power series?

Part I: 2-dim. polynomial-power series rings Setting: R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, k = field; eg. R = Z, k = Q. What are the Spectra of R[y], R[[x]], k[[x, y]], k[y][[x]], k[[x]][y], k[x, y]?

Part I: 2-dim. polynomial-power series rings Setting: R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, k = field; eg. R = Z, k = Q. What are the Spectra of R[y], R[[x]], k[[x, y]], k[y][[x]], k[[x]][y], k[x, y]? Spec(R[y]) for R semilocal, characterized Kearnes & Oman; W 2 ] [Heinzer, sw; Shah;

Part I: 2-dim. polynomial-power series rings Setting: R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, k = field; eg. R = Z, k = Q. What are the Spectra of R[y], R[[x]], k[[x, y]], k[y][[x]], k[[x]][y], k[x, y]? Spec(R[y]) for R semilocal, characterized Kearnes & Oman; W 2 ] [Heinzer, sw; Shah; Spec(Z[y]) for the integers Z, characterized [R. Wiegand, 86].

Part I: 2-dim. polynomial-power series rings Setting: R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, k = field; eg. R = Z, k = Q. What are the Spectra of R[y], R[[x]], k[[x, y]], k[y][[x]], k[[x]][y], k[x, y]? Spec(R[y]) for R semilocal, characterized Kearnes & Oman; W 2 ] [Heinzer, sw; Shah; Spec(Z[y]) for the integers Z, characterized [R. Wiegand, 86]. Spec(R[y]) for R = D[g/f ] and D = order in algebraic number field: Spec(R[y]) = Spec(Z[y]) [rw; Li, sw; Saydam, sw]. For many other R, Spec(R[y]) is unknown.

Spec(R[y]) for R semilocal; Henselian, non-hens. # bullets = max R β P 1 β β (0) γ 1 γ 2 γ n β P 1 P 2 P n MESS (0)

2-dim. polynomial-power series rings, cont. Spec(k[x, y]) for k F q, characterized [rw].

2-dim. polynomial-power series rings, cont. Spec(k[x, y]) for k F q, characterized [rw]. Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y], for k F q [rw]. Then Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y] k F q [W 2 ].

2-dim. polynomial-power series rings, cont. Spec(k[x, y]) for k F q, characterized [rw]. Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y], for k F q [rw]. Then Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y] k F q [W 2 ]. Spec(Q[x, y]) is still unknown! Spec(k[x, y]) unknown for other k!!

2-dim. polynomial-power series rings, cont. Spec(k[x, y]) for k F q, characterized [rw]. Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y], for k F q [rw]. Then Spec(k[x, y]) = Spec Z[y] k F q [W 2 ]. Spec(Q[x, y]) is still unknown! Spec(k[x, y]) unknown for other k!! So we turn to the rest rings with power series in them. MUCH easier!!

What is Spec(Z[[x]])?? Theorem [W. Heinzer, C. Rotthaus & SW, 06; W 2, 09] R a Noetherian domain, dim R = 1, = Spec(R[[x]]) is

What is Spec(Z[[x]])?? Theorem [W. Heinzer, C. Rotthaus & SW, 06; W 2, 09] R a Noetherian domain, dim R = 1, = Spec(R[[x]]) is (#{bullets} = max R ) (x) R[[x]] R[[x]] (0)

What is Spec(Z[[x]])?? Theorem [W. Heinzer, C. Rotthaus & SW, 06; W 2, 09] R a Noetherian domain, dim R = 1, = Spec(R[[x]]) is (#{bullets} = max R ) (x) R[[x]] R[[x]] (0) R = Z = max Z = Z, Z[[x]] = R.

What is Spec(Z[[x]])?? Theorem [W. Heinzer, C. Rotthaus & SW, 06; W 2, 09] R a Noetherian domain, dim R = 1, = Spec(R[[x]]) is (#{bullets} = max R ) (x) R[[x]] R[[x]] (0) R = Z = max Z = Z, Z[[x]] = R. Corollary: Spec(Q[y][[x]]) = Spec(Z[[x]]).

What is Spec(Q[[x]][y])?

What is Spec(Q[[x]][y])? Theorem [Heinzer & SW 89; Shah 96; KO 10] Characterization of Spec H[y], for H a local Henselian Noetherian domain, dim H = 1, = Spec(k[[x]][y]) is

What is Spec(Q[[x]][y])? Theorem [Heinzer & SW 89; Shah 96; KO 10] Characterization of Spec H[y], for H a local Henselian Noetherian domain, dim H = 1, = Spec(k[[x]][y]) is (#{bullets} = max(k[y]) k[[x]] (x) k[[x]] k[[x]] (0) Spec(k[[x]][y]), for k a field.

What is Spec(Q[[x]][y])? Theorem [Heinzer & SW 89; Shah 96; KO 10] Characterization of Spec H[y], for H a local Henselian Noetherian domain, dim H = 1, = Spec(k[[x]][y]) is (#{bullets} = max(k[y]) k[[x]] (x) k[[x]] k[[x]] (0) Spec(k[[x]][y]), for k a field. Thus Spec(Q[[x]][y]) is just like Spec(Q[y][[x]]), except that it has an arm" sticking out on the left.

Part II: Spec(E/Q), for E poly-power series Let E = k[[x]][y, z], R[[x]][y], R[y][[x]], or R[[x, y]], Here k = a field or R = a 1-dim Noetherian integral domain, and Q Spec E, ht Q = 1, (usually) Q xe.

Part II: Spec(E/Q), for E poly-power series Let E = k[[x]][y, z], R[[x]][y], R[y][[x]], or R[[x, y]], Here k = a field or R = a 1-dim Noetherian integral domain, and Q Spec E, ht Q = 1, (usually) Q xe. Notice that these rings are catenary, and Noetherian. A ring A is catenary provided for every pair P Q in Spec(A), the number of prime ideals in every maximal chain of form P = P 0 P 1 P 2... P n = Q is the same. Question: What is Spec(R[[x, y]]/q)? (Q = (x) is okay.)

Spec(R[[x, y]]/q) Q = (x) is okay in (case i Theorem [CEW, Theorem 4.1] R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[[x, y]]), ht Q = 1. Set B = R[[x, y]]/q. Then: Case i: Q (x, y)r[[x, y]] = n N, m 1,..., m n max(r) and Spec(B) is:

Spec(R[[x, y]]/q) Q = (x) is okay in (case i Theorem [CEW, Theorem 4.1] R = 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[[x, y]]), ht Q = 1. Set B = R[[x, y]]/q. Then: Case i: Q (x, y)r[[x, y]] = n N, m 1,..., m n max(r) and Spec(B) is: (m 1, x, y) (m 2, x, y) (m n, x, y) B B B OR Q

Spec(R[[x, y]]/q) case ii Case ii: Q (x, y)r[[x, y]] = Spec(B) = Spec(R[[x]]); so Spec(B) is:

Spec(R[[x, y]]/q) case ii Case ii: Q (x, y)r[[x, y]] = Spec(B) = Spec(R[[x]]); so Spec(B) is: (m 1, x, y) (m 2, x, y) (x, y) B B where the m i range over all the elements of max(r). Q The diagrams show Spec(R[[x, y]]/q) is characterized for each case.

Spec(E/Q), in the dim 1 case. Here E = k[[x]][y, z], R[[x]][y], or R[y][[x]] a mixed poly-power series, where k = a field or R = a 1-dim Noetherian integral domain, and Q Spec E, ht Q = 1, Q xe.

Spec(E/Q), in the dim 1 case. Here E = k[[x]][y, z], R[[x]][y], or R[y][[x]] a mixed poly-power series, where k = a field or R = a 1-dim Noetherian integral domain, and Q Spec E, ht Q = 1, Q xe. Case i: dim(e/q) = 1. Then dim(spec(e/q)) = 1, = a fan". (This case occurs if Q (m, Q)E max(e) or = E, m max R Not for E = R[y][[x]].) eg. Q = (2xy + 1) Z[[x]][y] = Spec(E/Q) is:

Spec(E/Q), in the dim 1 case. Here E = k[[x]][y, z], R[[x]][y], or R[y][[x]] a mixed poly-power series, where k = a field or R = a 1-dim Noetherian integral domain, and Q Spec E, ht Q = 1, Q xe. Case i: dim(e/q) = 1. Then dim(spec(e/q)) = 1, = a fan". (This case occurs if Q (m, Q)E max(e) or = E, m max R Not for E = R[y][[x]].) eg. Q = (2xy + 1) Z[[x]][y] = Spec(E/Q) is: (3, 2xy + 1) (5, 2xy + 1)... (2xy + 1) Spec( Z[[x]][y]/(2xy + 1) ) Note: The hgt-3 max ideals of Z[[x]][y] are {(p, x, h i (y))}, where p Sylvia prime Wiegand of (work Z, hof i (y) W. Heinzer, irred C. Rotthaus, mod SW pz. & E. Celikbas, Prime C. Eubanks-Turner, ideals, power series SW)

Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) with R countable, max(r) infinite. (dim 2 always for this case) e.g. E = Z[y][[x]], Q = (x α), α = 2 3 y (2y 1) (y + 1) (y(y + 1) + 6). {(p, x, 2y 1)} {(3, x, h(y))} N N N N (3, x, y + 1) (3, x, y) (5, x, y + 2) (2, x, y + 1) (2, x, y) (x, 2y 1) (x, 3) (x, y + 1) (x, y) (x, y(y + 1) + 6) (x, 2) (0) = (x α) Note; Every height-two element has a set of R elements below it and below no other height-two element (not shown).

Features of U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) if R, Q as above. Theorem: If U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q), where R a countable 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[y][[x]]), ht Q = 1, Q (x), then 1 U has a unique minimal element, U = R, dim U = 2. 2 t U, ht t = 2 = t,e = R. ((t,e = {v U v < t, v s, s t}.) 3 max(u) = {ht-2 U}.

Features of U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) if R, Q as above. Theorem: If U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q), where R a countable 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[y][[x]]), ht Q = 1, Q (x), then 1 U has a unique minimal element, U = R, dim U = 2. 2 t U, ht t = 2 = t,e = R. ((t,e = {v U v < t, v s, s t}.) 3 max(u) = {ht-2 U}.

Features of U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) if R, Q as above. Theorem: If U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q), where R a countable 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[y][[x]]), ht Q = 1, Q (x), then 1 U has a unique minimal element, U = R, dim U = 2. 2 t U, ht t = 2 = t,e = R. ((t,e = {v U v < t, v s, s t}.) 3 max(u) = {ht-2 U}. 4 F 0 finite { non-max ht-1 elements} with: (a) f F 0 f = {ht-2 U}. (f = {t U f < t}.)

Features of U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) if R, Q as above. Theorem: If U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q), where R a countable 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[y][[x]]), ht Q = 1, Q (x), then 1 U has a unique minimal element, U = R, dim U = 2. 2 t U, ht t = 2 = t,e = R. ((t,e = {v U v < t, v s, s t}.) 3 max(u) = {ht-2 U}. 4 F 0 finite { non-max ht-1 elements} with: (a) f F 0 f = {ht-2 U}. (f = {t U f < t}.) (b) f F 0, f \ ( g F 0,g f g ) = N. ( = F 0 {j-primes}.) (c) f g F 0, f g <. (F 0 = { non-0, nonmax j-prime ideals} = {u ht-1 u 2}.) Define F := ( f g F 0 f g ) F 0, a finite set by item c. Then F determines U.

Features of U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) if R, Q as above. Theorem: If U = Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q), where R a countable 1-dim Noetherian domain, Q Spec(R[y][[x]]), ht Q = 1, Q (x), then 1 U has a unique minimal element, U = R, dim U = 2. 2 t U, ht t = 2 = t,e = R. ((t,e = {v U v < t, v s, s t}.) 3 max(u) = {ht-2 U}. 4 F 0 finite { non-max ht-1 elements} with: (a) f F 0 f = {ht-2 U}. (f = {t U f < t}.) (b) f F 0, f \ ( g F 0,g f g ) = N. ( = F 0 {j-primes}.) (c) f g F 0, f g <. (F 0 = { non-0, nonmax j-prime ideals} = {u ht-1 u 2}.) Define F := ( f g F 0 f g ) F 0, a finite set by item c. Then F determines U. Theorem: For every finite poset F of dim 1, Q Spec(Z [y][[x]]) such that F determines" Spec(Z[y][[x]]/Q). (Want every ht-1 element of F above 2 ht-0 elements of F.)

What is Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q)?

What is Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q)? Answer: For the example Q on previous slide #{ht 1} max(z[[y][x]]/q)} = R. Otherwise, the spectrum is the same.

What is Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q)? Answer: For the example Q on previous slide #{ht 1} max(z[[y][x]]/q)} = R. Otherwise, the spectrum is the same. Notes 1. In dim 2 case, for general Q, Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q) is the same as Spec(Z[[y][x]][y]/Q), except that there may be R height-one maximal ideals.

What is Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q)? Answer: For the example Q on previous slide #{ht 1} max(z[[y][x]]/q)} = R. Otherwise, the spectrum is the same. Notes 1. In dim 2 case, for general Q, Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q) is the same as Spec(Z[[y][x]][y]/Q), except that there may be R height-one maximal ideals. 2. Let R or k be countable and max R =. Then Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) can be characterized as indicated above, in terms of F. For E = R[[x]][y], the characterization" or type" of Spec(E/Q) depends on the set F and ε = #{ht-1 maximal ideals}. l y (Q) (ideal of leading coefficients in R[[x]]) a unit = #{ height-one maximal ideals of E/Q} = 0, l y (Q) (ideal of leading coefficients in R[[x]]) NOT a unit and R a UFD = #{ height-one maximal ideals of E/Q} = R[[x]],

What is Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q)? Answer: For the example Q on previous slide #{ht 1} max(z[[y][x]]/q)} = R. Otherwise, the spectrum is the same. Notes 1. In dim 2 case, for general Q, Spec(Z[[x]][y]/Q) is the same as Spec(Z[[y][x]][y]/Q), except that there may be R height-one maximal ideals. 2. Let R or k be countable and max R =. Then Spec(R[y][[x]]/Q) can be characterized as indicated above, in terms of F. For E = R[[x]][y], the characterization" or type" of Spec(E/Q) depends on the set F and ε = #{ht-1 maximal ideals}. l y (Q) (ideal of leading coefficients in R[[x]]) a unit = #{ height-one maximal ideals of E/Q} = 0, l y (Q) (ideal of leading coefficients in R[[x]]) NOT a unit and R a UFD = #{ height-one maximal ideals of E/Q} = R[[x]], 3. For E = k[[x]][y][z], #{ height-one maximal ideals of E/Q} = k[[x]]. So again, k countable = Spec(E/Q) is determined Sylvia by F Wiegand (among (work of W. possible Heinzer, C. Rotthaus, spectra SW & for E. Celikbas, k[[x]][y][z]/q) Prime C. Eubanks-Turner, ideals, power series SW)

Spectra for A = K R, K a field, R = power series Part III. (from [HRW]) Noetherian and Non-Noetherian Examples. Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) or R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z). Q(R) = k(x, y) or k(x, y, z). Take R = k[y] (y) [[x]] or k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]].

Spectra for A = K R, K a field, R = power series Part III. (from [HRW]) Noetherian and Non-Noetherian Examples. Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) or R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z). Q(R) = k(x, y) or k(x, y, z). Take R = k[y] (y) [[x]] or k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. a) Intersection Domain" A = K R, K = a field Q(R ). Take K = Q(R)(f ) Q(R ), where f xr are algebraically independent over Q(R).

Spectra for A = K R, K a field, R = power series Part III. (from [HRW]) Noetherian and Non-Noetherian Examples. Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) or R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z). Q(R) = k(x, y) or k(x, y, z). Take R = k[y] (y) [[x]] or k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. a) Intersection Domain" A = K R, K = a field Q(R ). Take K = Q(R)(f ) Q(R ), where f xr are algebraically independent over Q(R). b). "Approximation domain" B (approximating A) formed by adding endpieces" of f to R. (Described below.)

Spectra for A = K R, K a field, R = power series Part III. (from [HRW]) Noetherian and Non-Noetherian Examples. Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) or R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z). Q(R) = k(x, y) or k(x, y, z). Take R = k[y] (y) [[x]] or k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. a) Intersection Domain" A = K R, K = a field Q(R ). Take K = Q(R)(f ) Q(R ), where f xr are algebraically independent over Q(R). b). "Approximation domain" B (approximating A) formed by adding endpieces" of f to R. (Described below.) Notes 1. B is Noetherian (B = A and A is Noetherian.) 2. Sometimes A is Noetherian, but B is not. 3. If B is Noetherian then B is catenary, in fact universally catenary. (For catenary, non-universally catenary Noetherian examples, we use another version of the construction given above.)

yzτ Example: Let R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z) = R = k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. Choose τ xk[[x]], algebraically independent over k(x). The yzτ Example: Let f = yzτ xr. Then f = i=1 a ix i, a i yzk For every n N, the n th endpiece f n of f is: f n := i=n+1 a i x i n. Note: f n := a n+1 x + x i=n+2 a ix i n 1 = a n+1 x + xf n+1. Set B n := k[x, y, z, f n ] (x,y,z,fn ). By Note, B n B n+1. Define the Approximation Domain B B := B n. In this example, B is not Noetherian, by our methods.

The 1-coefficient example Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) = R = k[y] (y) [[x]]. Choose σ xk[[x]], algebraically independent over k(x).

The 1-coefficient example Let R = k[x, y] (x,y) = R = k[y] (y) [[x]]. Choose σ xk[[x]], algebraically independent over k(x). The 1-coefficient example Let f = yσ xr. Let B be the approximation domain, B = k[x, y, z, f n ] (x,y,z,fn). B is not Noetherian.

The 2-coefficient example Let R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z) = R = k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. Choose τ, σ xk[[x]], algebraically independent over k(x).

The 2-coefficient example Let R = k[x, y, z] (x,y,z) = R = k[y, z] (y,z) [[x]]. Choose τ, σ xk[[x]], algebraically independent over k(x). The 2-coefficient example Let f = yσ + zτ xr. Let B be the approximation domain. So B = k[x, y, z, f n ] (x,y,z,fn). B is not Noetherian.

Spec B, for the 1-coeff example, B k[[x, y]] m B := (x, y)b Q := (y, {f i })B xb Type I y(y + τ)b Type II yb Type III (0) Spec B Type I" = B/P is Noetherian"; Type III"= P not contracted." Type II" = P = P B, P Spec(k[[x, y]]."

Properties of the 1-coefficient example B is a non-noetherian local integral domain (B, m B ) such that: 1 dim B = 3. 2 The ring B is a UFD that is not catenary. 3 The maximal ideal m B of B is (x, y)b. 4 The m B -adic completion of B is a two-dimensional regular local domain. 5 For every non-maximal prime ideal P of B, the ring B P is Noetherian. 6 The ring B has precisely 1 prime ideal of height two. 7 Every prime ideal of B of height two is not finitely generated; all other prime ideals of B are finitely generated.

Part of Spec B, for the yzτ example, B k[[x, y, z]] m B := (x, y, z)b {(z, y βx, {f i })B} (x, z)b {(y, z βx, {f i })B} (y, z, {f i })B (x, y)b (z, {f i })B (y, z)b (y, {f i })B zb xb (0) yb

yzτ Theorem: Theorem Let B be the yzτ example. Then: 1 B = 4-dim local UFD, max ideal m B = (x, y, z)b, B = k[[x, y, z]]. 2 B[1/x] = Noetherian regular UFD, dim(b/xb) = 2. If P Spec B, B P an RLR B P is Noetherian (yz, x)r B P. ht P 2 = B P is an RLR. 3 What ideals of B are finitely generated? Partial answer: 1 Every height-one prime ideal is principal. 2 Q 1 := (y, {f n })B = yr B, Q 2 := (z, {f n })B = zr B, Q 3 := (y, z, {f n })B = (y, z)r B are prime ideals, not finitely generated; ht Q 1 = ht Q 2 = 2, ht Q 3 = 3. 3 The prime ideals (x, y)b and (x, z)b have height three. 4 If P is a height-two prime ideal of B that contains an element of the form y + g(z, x) or z + h(x, y), where 0 g(z, x) (x, z)k[x, z] and 0 h(x, y) (x, y)k[x, y], then P is generated by two elements. 5 If a is an ideal of B that contains x + yzg(y, z), for some polynomial g(y, z) k[y, z], then a is finitely generated. 6 many ht-3 non-finitely generated prime ideals, e.g. Q i,α = (y αx i, z, {f n })B, where i N and α k.

d-coefficient Example Let R = k[x, y 1,..., y d ] (x,y1,...,y d ), R = k[y 1,..., y d ] ( ) [[x]], τ 1,..., τ d xk[[x]] algebraically independent over k(x), and f = y 1 τ 1 +... y d τ d xr Define B = k[x, y 1,..., y d, f n ] (x,y1,...,y d,f n ). Then B is a non-catenary, non-noetherian local UFD of dimension d + 2 such that: (i) B has exactly 1 prime ideal of height d + 1; (ii) The height-(d + 1) prime ideal is not finitely generated; (iii) The localization of B at every nonmaximal prime ideal of B is Noetherian.

THANKS!