Fourier Coefficients of Far Fields and the Convex Scattering Support John Sylvester University of Washington

Similar documents
The Support of a Far Field

Approximate Methods for Time-Reversal Processing of Large Seismic Reflection Data Sets. University of California, LLNL

Uncertainty principles for far field patterns and applications to inverse source problems

The Factorization Method for Inverse Scattering Problems Part I

Imaging with Ambient Noise II

Contents. 1 Basic Equations 1. Acknowledgment. 1.1 The Maxwell Equations Constitutive Relations 11

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Orthogonality Sampling for Object Visualization

Inverse Obstacle Scattering

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

11.D.2. Collision Operators

Multipole Expansion for Radiation;Vector Spherical Harmonics

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES FOR INVERSE SOURCE PROBLEMS, FAR FIELD SPLITTING AND DATA COMPLETION

CHAPTER 3 CYLINDRICAL WAVE PROPAGATION

A far-field based T-matrix method for three dimensional acoustic scattering

Non-relativistic scattering

Solutions to exam : 1FA352 Quantum Mechanics 10 hp 1

Physics 580: Quantum Mechanics I Department of Physics, UIUC Fall Semester 2017 Professor Eduardo Fradkin

Lecture notes 5: Diffraction

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 7

Lecture 16 February 25, 2016

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Inverse Scattering with Partial data on Asymptotically Hyperbolic Manifolds

Quantum Mechanics II

An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations in the Undergraduate Curriculum

Introduction to quantum information processing

Factorization method in inverse

Short note on compact operators - Monday 24 th March, Sylvester Eriksson-Bique

Anouncements. Assignment 3 has been posted!

Measuring Ellipsoids 1

1 POTENTIAL FLOW THEORY Formulation of the seakeeping problem

Handout 7 Reciprocal Space

3 Green s functions in 2 and 3D

Scripps Institution of Oceanography Seminar University of California San Diego, October 7, 2005

Course Description for Real Analysis, Math 156

ECE 6340 Intermediate EM Waves. Fall Prof. David R. Jackson Dept. of ECE. Notes 17

Light Scattering Group

The Helmholtz Equation

BEHAVIOR OF THE REGULARIZED SAMPLING INVERSE SCATTERING METHOD AT INTERNAL RESONANCE FREQUENCIES

5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:

A converse to the Ambrosetti-Prodi theorem

Chapter 10: QUANTUM SCATTERING

Transmission Eigenvalues in Inverse Scattering Theory

Chapter 2 Acoustical Background

Photonic crystals: from Bloch modes to T-matrices

Spring /2/ pts 1 point per minute

Math 46, Applied Math (Spring 2009): Final

Introduction to Mathematical Physics

Chapter 7: Bounded Operators in Hilbert Spaces

DIFFRACTION OF PLANE SH WAVES BY A CIRCULAR CAVITY IN QUARTER-INFINITE MEDIUM

Extended Foldy Lax Approximation on Multiple Scattering

A Factorization Method for Multifrequency Inverse Source Problems with Sparse Far Field Measurements

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Atmospheric Refraction. And Related Phenomena

Tangent spaces, normals and extrema

Calculation of Scattering Intensities for the Interaction of Light with a Cluster of Dielectric Objects

Notation. General. Notation Description See. Sets, Functions, and Spaces. a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

12. Nonlinear optics I

Physics 217 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008

Pulse propagation in random waveguides with turning points and application to imaging

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS. University at Albany State University of New York. Comprehensive Field Examination. Classical. Monday, May 21, 2018

Inverse scattering problem with underdetermined data.

Final Exam May 4, 2016

Vibrating-string problem

Some negative results on the use of Helmholtz integral equations for rough-surface scattering

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics 8.03 Practice Final Exam 3

A family of closed form expressions for the scalar field of strongly focused

McGill University April 16, Advanced Calculus for Engineers

Digital Image Processing

A Statistical Kirchhoff Model for EM Scattering from Gaussian Rough Surface

Math Linear Algebra II. 1. Inner Products and Norms

Lecture 7: Scattering from an infinite number of obstacles (1)

Numerical range and random matrices

Conformal maps. Lent 2019 COMPLEX METHODS G. Taylor. A star means optional and not necessarily harder.

Invisible lenses with positive isotropic refractive index

Chapter 8. Rigid transformations

Phys.Let A. 360, N1, (2006),

Mid Term-1 : Solutions to practice problems

Imaging and time reversal in random media

Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems

Smooth Structure. lies on the boundary, then it is determined up to the identifications it 1 2

2D Imaging in Random Media with Active Sensor Array

Surface Waves and Free Oscillations. Surface Waves and Free Oscillations

Analysis of the anomalous localized resonance

y mx 25m 25 4 circle. Then the perpendicular distance of tangent from the centre (0, 0) is the radius. Since tangent

21 Laplace s Equation and Harmonic Functions

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

1 Polarization of Light

Final Examination Solutions

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Final Exam Solutions

Lecture 19 Optical MEMS (1)

Linear Algebra March 16, 2019

Department of Physics PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 2012 Part II. Long Questions

ELLIPTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS EXERCISES I (HARMONIC FUNCTIONS)

UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL INVERSE SOURCE PROBLEMS

Solid State Physics Lecture 3 Diffraction and the Reciprocal Lattice (Kittel Ch. 2)

The Linear Sampling Method and the MUSIC Algorithm

VISCOSITY SOLUTIONS. We follow Han and Lin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, 5.

Transcription:

Fourier Coefficients of Far Fields and the Convex Scattering Support John Sylvester University of Washington Collaborators: Steve Kusiak Roland Potthast Jim Berryman Gratefully acknowledge research support from ONR and NSF

Outline Fixed Frequency Scattering and Inverse Scattering Singular Values of Homogeneous Far Field Operator associated with a ball. Source in a Ball iff Fourier Coefficients in a Box Translation Formula for Fourier Coefficients of Far Fields Applications to Array Imaging locating sources or scatterers Algorithm to find a small scatterer Find the convex hull of a big scatterer Split the far fields of well separated scatterers Analyze and enhance the focusing of TR eigenfunctions 2

Passive Remote Sensing u tt u = F(x, t) u(x, ) = u t (x, ) = The source radiates No Illumination zero initial conditions Sensor Array is many wavelengths away Full (or partial) Aperture Observations Data measured by the sensor is called the Far Field Only one Far Field to measure 3

Active Remote Sensing n 2 (x)u tt u = u tt u = ( n 2 (x))u tt u(x, ) = g(θ)δ(t x r ) u t (x, ) = g(θ)δ (t x r ) Incoming wave illuminates incoming initial conditions Scatterer becomes an Induced Source Many Far Fields one for each illuminating wave Nonlinear effects from strong scatterers Passive Location Algorithms apply directly 4

Time Harmonic Model F(x, t) = e iωt F(x) u(x, t) = e iωt u(x) Wave equation becomes Helmholtz equation (k = n ω) ( + k 2 ) u = F(x, k) G + F is the outgoing wave radiated by the source F. 5

Outgoing Waves and Far Fields u(x, k) = G + F F + F eikr r n 2 α(θ) := α(θ) = F(kΘ) G + F + F is the outgoing wave radiated by the source F. F is the far field radiated by F. We can calculate F + F, and it turns out to be the Fourier Transform of F, restricted to to the sphere of radius k. 6

The (Relative) Scattering Operator ( + k 2 ) u = qu (= k 2 (n 2 )u) u = β(θ) S q β := u + β(θ) u is the incoming far field and u + is the outgoing far field. S q measures the difference between the outgoing far field you see and the one you would have seen if nothing were there. If the aperture is less than π, you don t see the β( Θ). F + F + and Sq S q are far field versions of the time reversal operator. ( S q S q ) 4 is the Linear Sampling Operator 7

Singular Value Decomposition The Far Field operator has a singular value decomposition = σ n Φ n Ψ n Bc (R) F + q A source sits inside a ball iff the Fourier coefficients ( F + q F, Φ n ) C q σ n (R) For the homogeneous background, we can compute by hand Φ n = e inθ Ψ c n = χ krc J n (kr c )e inφ c σ n σ 2 n(r) = R J 2 n(kr)rdr 8

A Box For the Fourier Coefficients 4.5 4 3.5 3 σ n (25) σ n 2.5 2.5.5 4 3 2 2 3 4 n n σ n (R) = ( R J 2 n(kr)rdr ((kr) 2 n 2 ) 4 ( n+ 2 ) 2 ) (n+ ekr 2(n+ 2 ) n < kr 2 ) n > kr 9

Rapid Transition to Evanescence The homogeneous background exhibits a rapid transition to evanescence. σ n (R) uniformly big if n < R σ n (R) uniformly small if n > R Uniform contrast between big and small Where is the Origin? All source points are effectively equidistant from the far field. Thus we can translate the origin c with a mathematical formula. You don t have to move the array. F + [F(x c)] = eik c cos(θ θ c) α(θ)

Fourier Coefficients of the Far Field F + F = α(θ) = α ne inθ F + [F(x c)] = eik c cos(θ θ c) α(θ) = α c ne inθ Rule for Locating A Source The α n are zero for n > kr iff there is a source inside B R () that radiates α. The α c n are zero for n > kr c iff there is a source inside B Rc (c) that radiates α. If both conditions above are satisfied, there is a source inside the intersection of the two balls.

Finding a Source Triangle (k = 2) A single layer source on a triangle (about 4 wavelengths on a side) is somewhere in a 3x3 box. We plot the modulus or the Fourier coefficients of Far Field it radiates on the right, measure the width, and draw the circle of radius W/k on the left. Centered at 2 2 2 2 Ball of radius 55/2 about (,).8.6.4.2 5 5 Modulus of α n versus n 2

5 4 3 2 Choose a new center at the top of the old circle. Plot the translated Fourier Coefficients. Measure the width of the box and draw the new circle..9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2 Centered at.34 2.7257 2 2 2 Ball of radius 49/2 about (,2.7). 5 5 Modulus of α c n versus n 3

5 4 3 2 Choose a new center at the intesection of the old circles. Plot the translated Fourier Coefficients. Measure the width of the box and draw the new circle..8.6.4.2 Centered at 2.767.668 2 2 2 4 Ball of radius 36/2 about (2.2,.6) 5 5 Modulus of α c n versus n 4

Translated Far Field (k = 2) 5 4 3 2.8.6.4.2 Centered at.6348 2.625 2 2 2 4 Ball of radius 4/2 about (.6,2.6) 5 5 Modulus of α c n versus n 5

Translated Far Field (k = 2) 5 4 3.4.2 Centered at.662.99249 2 2 2 2 4 Ball of radius 3/2 about (.6,).8.6.4.2 5 5 Modulus of α c n versus n 6

Translated Far Field (k = 2) 5 4 3.4.2 Centered at.662.99249 2 2 2 2 4 The source triangle.8.6.4.2 5 5 Modulus of α c n versus n 7

Confessions We can only find convex hulls by intersecting balls. We are actually finding the Convex Scattering Support of the far field, which can be smaller than the convex hull. Its impossible to do better if you measure only one far field. A point source and a spherically symmetric source produce the same far fields. Its impossible to find an upper bound using observations of a single (or finitely many) far fields. The convex hull of the true source must contain the Convex Scattering Support. The Convex Scattering Support isn t too small. There is always a source that fits inside that radiates the far field. Corners and components are always visible. 8

Narrow Boxes, High Amplitudes F + F = α(θ) = α ne inθ F + [F(x c)] = eik c cos(θ θ c) α(θ) = α c ne inθ The translation operator is L 2 unitary As the center gets closer to the center of the source, the Fourier coefficients get squeezed into a narrow box. If you squeeze the Fourier coefficients into a narrow box, they get higher. High enough to stand out from a background. 9

A strong source among 2 weaker sources (2% strength) 2 pentagons (radius =.4) with point sources on the corners somewhere in 3x3 square. 4 3 2 2 3 4 4 2 2 4.45.4.35.3.25.2.5..5 Centered at 2 2 8 6 4 2 2 4 5 5.7.6.5.4.3.2. Centered at.24234 3.987 2 2 5.5.4 Centered at 2.773 2.856 5.35.3.25 Centered at 4.478.5323.3.2.2.5 5. 5..5 5 5 2 2 5 5 2 2 2

.4 Centered at 3.638 2.5274.5 Centered at 3.373.2623 5.35.3.25 5.4.3.2.5.2 5..5 5. 5 5 2 2 5 5 2 2 5.8.6.4 Centered at 2.6258.265 5.2 5 5 2 2 2

Other Applications of the Box Splitting the Far Fields of two sources Φ = F + F + F + F 2 c = α + α 2 R R2 Build a projection operator Translate to center c Cut out modes n > kr Translate back P = T c χ n<kr T c 22

Splitting the Far Fields of two sources α + α 2 = Φ α = P Φ P α 2 α 2 = P 2 Φ P 2 α (I P P 2 ) α = P (I P 2 ) Φ We can represent P P 2 is a 2kR 2kR 2 toeplitz matrix whose entries are Bessel functions evaluated at k c = k c c 2. We can use this representation to compute and to estimate the stability of the inverse, at least when the scatterers are far apart. P P 2 2 k R R 2 c 23

Fourier Coefficients of S q Fit in a Square If q fits in a ball, (S q ) m n C qσ n (R)σ m (R) Conclusions persist in the presence of multiple scattering. Every reflected wave has a last bounce (and a first bounce). Why its so... Send it back bounce it around Send it in S q β = F + ( ) I qg + q Hβ S q β = F + q ( I G + q) Hβ S q β = ( F + χ ) suppq q ( I G + q) ( ) F + χ suppq β 24

Eigenfunctions Fit in the Same Box (S q ) m n C qσ n (R)σ m (R) e λ n C q σ n (R) so location, splitting, and projection methods apply here as well. In particular, For separated scatterers, e q e q2 k min(r, R 2 ) c Thus the eigenfunctions of the one scattering operator are nearly orthogonal to those of the another scattereirng operator if the scatterers are separated. Via perturbation theory, the eigenfunctions of the sum are nearly the union of the eigenvectors. 25

Translated Fourier Coefficients of an Eigenfunction.4 Centered in the Middle Centered in the middle Centered at the strong scatterer Centered at the weak scatterer.3.2. 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Centered at the Weak Scatterer.5 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Centered at the Strong Scatterer.2.5..5 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Born Approximation for two point scatterers (k = ) One scatterer is 2% stronger Eigenfunction with largest eigenvalue 26

Translated Coefficients of Second Eigenfunction.4 Centered in the Middle Centered in the middle Centered at the strong scatterer Centered at the weak scatterer.3.2. 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Centered at the Weak Scatterer.4.3.2. 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Centered at the Strong Scatterer.5 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 Time Reversal Eigenfunctions localize in space Formulas analyze relation between individual scatterers and eigenfunctions in a simple way Plots of translated eigenfunctions show localization on the Fourier side. 27

Summary Narrow Box Principle gives a new way to probe for location and to analyze other aspects of localization on the other side of the Fourier Transform. No hypothesis about sources or scatterers. Algorithms contract down from the outside rather than sampling from the inside. Only convex hulls from single far field. Some indications we can work with limited aperture. Translation formula makes essential use of the Far Field. 28