Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Similar documents
Analysis of a single pile settlement

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

Clayey sand (SC)

K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions

ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED FIXED HEADED SINGLE FLOATING PILE IN MULTILAYERED SOIL USING BEF APPROACH

Talić Z. et al: Geotechnical characteristics... Archives for Technical Sciences 2014, 11(1), 33-39

Calculation and analysis of internal force of piles excavation supporting. based on differential equation. Wei Wang

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

Analysis of Pile Foundation Subjected to Lateral and Vertical Loads

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILES IN SAND BASED ON SOIL-PILE INTERACTION

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

Nonlinear pushover analysis for pile foundations

CHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

Investigation of Pile- Soil Interaction Subjected to Lateral Loads in Layered Soils

Flexural Behavior of Laterally Loaded Tapered Piles in Cohesive Soils

Gapping effects on the lateral stiffness of piles in cohesive soil

INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Port and Marine Structures Made of Sheet Piling with Staggered Toe. 1. Introduction. 2. Design Approach and Main Dependencies

The theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will

S E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S

Report No. K-TRAN: KU-10-2 FINAL REPORT November 2013

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Entrance exam Master Course

Analysis of pile foundation Simplified methods to analyse the pile foundation under lateral and vertical loads

PILE SOIL INTERACTION MOMENT AREA METHOD

Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Recent Load History on the Behaviour of Steel Piles under Horizontal Loading

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Parametric Study of Beam Slab Raft Foundation

CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

SELECTION OF PARAMETERS AND CALCULATION OF LATERALLY LOADED PILES BY TRADITIONAL METHODS

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

Cyclic lateral response of piles in dry sand: Effect of pile slenderness

Problems of building and designing on semi-rocky soils

ANALYSES OF SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON VERTICAL LOAD TESTS OF DISPLACEMENT PILES

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Correlations between soil parameters and penetration testing results

Rock slope rock wedge stability

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

Assignment 1 - actions

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Monopile design

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

Seismic design of bridges

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

Axially Loaded Piles

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd

ON THE PREDICTION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS FROM TWO PILE TESTS UNDER FORCED VIBRATIONS

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

BENCHMARK LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF LATERALLY LOADED SINGLE PILE USING OPENSEES & COMPARISON WITH ANALYTICAL SOLUTION

STABILITY AND DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF PAD FOUNDATIONONS ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

Dynamic Analysis to Study Soil-Pile Interaction Effects

Software Verification

EXAMPLE OF PILED FOUNDATIONS

Behavior of Offshore Piles under Monotonic Inclined Pullout Loading

HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

7.2 Design of minaret: Geometry:

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Mechanical Behaviors of Cylindrical Retaining Structures in Ultra-deep Excavation

Foundations of High Rise Buildings

Seabed instability and 3D FE jack-up soil-structure interaction analysis

PLAXIS 3D FOUNDATION Validation Manual. version 1.5

Use of Ultra-High Performance Concrete in Geotechnical and Substructure Applications

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Leaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity)

Seismic Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction under Various Soil Conditions

EVALUATION OF BENDING LOAD IN BATTER PILES SET IN SOFT CLAY

A. V T = 1 B. Ms = 1 C. Vs = 1 D. Vv = 1

Geology and Soil Mechanics /1A ( ) Mark the best answer on the multiple choice answer sheet.

Landslide FE Stability Analysis

Evaluation of Horizontal Displacement of Long Piles Subject to Lateral Loading in Sandy Soil

Negative Skin Friction on Large Pile Group New Wembley Stadium. Mei Cheong

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

CALCULATION OF A SHEET PILE WALL RELIABILITY INDEX IN ULTIMATE AND SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES

Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12

9/23/ S. Kenny, Ph.D., P.Eng. Lecture Goals. Reading List. Students will be able to: Lecture 09 Soil Retaining Structures

THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATIONS BASED ON LRFD FOR JAPANESE HIGHWAYS

PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Creation and modification of a geological model Program: Stratigraphy

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

9.13 Fixed Earth-Support Method for Penetration into Sandy Soil

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Finite Element analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles on Sloping Ground

Transcription:

Engineering manual No. 16 Updated: 07/2018 Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile Program: Soubor: Pile Demo_manual_16.gpi The objective of this engineering manual is to explain how to use the GEO 5 PILE program to analyse the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile. Problem specification The general specification of the problem was described in the previous chapter (12. Pile foundations Introduction). Carry out all calculations of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile as a followup to the previous problem presented in chapter 13. Analysis of vertical load-bearing capacity of a single pile. The resultant of the loading components N 1, M y,1, H x, 1 acts at the pile head level. Calculate pile dimensions in accordance with EN 1992-1. Problem specification chart single pile Solution We will use the GEO 5 PILE program to analyse this problem. In the text below we will describe the solution to this problem step by step. 1

The laterally loaded pile is analysed by the Finite Element Method as a beam resting on an elastic Winkler medium (Elastic subsoil - p-y method). Parameters of the soils along the pile length are characterised by the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil. The program contains a variety of options how to determine the modulus of reaction of subsoil. Methods with a linear course (Linear, Matlock and Reese) are suitable for cohesionless soils, whilst methods with a constant course (Constant, Vesic) are better for cohesive soils. The calculation method for modulus k h in accordance with CSN 73 1004 combines both approaches. In the first part of this chapter we will carry out the calculation using the constant modulus of reaction of subsoil; in the second part we will compare the differences occurring when other methods are used. Specification definition In the Pile program, open the file from manual no. 13. Firstly, in the Settings frame, click on the Edit button and check that the method of calculation of the horizontal bearing capacity is set as Elastic subsoil (p-y method). Note: For the vertical bearing capacity analysis of a pile in homogenous soil it is also possible to use the Broms method (for more details visit the program help F1). Edit current settings dialog window Other analysis settings such as the values of the specified loads and the geological profile including basic strength-related parameters of soils remain unchanged. 2

In the Settings frame, it is also necessary to uncheck the option Do not calculate horizontal bearing capacity. Settings frame Then move on to the Modulus Kh frame, where we will choose the constant modulus. Modulus k h frame Note: The constant course of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil depends on the modulus of deformation of soil E def MPa and the reduced pile width m help F1). r (for more details visit the program Subsequently, in the frame Soils, we will set the parameters of soils the value of the angle of ef dispersion within the range ef. This coefficient is, therefore, determined relative 4 to the internal soil friction angle (for more details visit the program help F1). 3

Soil (Soil classification) Unit weight 3 kn m Angle of internal friction ef Angle of dispersion Type of soil CS Sandy clay, firm consistency S-F Sand with trace of fines, medium dense soil 18,5 24,5 10,0 Cohesive 17,5 29,5 15,0 Cohesionless Table with the soil parameters Horizontal bearing capacity of single pile Now we will move on to the Horizontal capacity frame, where we can determine the value of the maximum horizontal deformation at the pile head, the course of the internal forces along the pile length and the results of the pile dimensioning for the assessment of concrete reinforcement in the direction of the maximum effect. Horizontal bearing capacity frame Assessment for constant course of modulus k h 4

Note: The boundary condition for a pile fixing at the pile base is modelled first in the cases of endbearing piles with bases in hard rock or semi-rock sub-grade (it is not this case). The boundary conditions at pile head are applied when the so-called deformation load is used, where only the angular rotation and deformation at pile head are set in the program, without setting the force load (for more details visit the program help F1). In this frame we will also carry out the dimensioning of the pile reinforcement. We will design a longitudinal structural reinforcement 18 pcs Ø 16 mm and a minimum concrete cover of 60 mm, corresponding to the environmental exposure grade XC1. Horizontal bearing capacity frame dimensioning 5

In this case we consider the reinforcement ratio for the laterally loaded single pile in accordance with CSN EN 1536: Execution of special geotechnical works - Bored piles (Table 4 Minimum reinforcement of bored piles). This possibility is set in the program by selecting the reinforcement ratio option Pile. Cross-sectional area of the pile: m A c 2 Area of longitudinal reinforcement: m A s 2 0.5 % A 2 A c 0.5 m s c 2 2 0.5 m Ac 1.0 m A A s 0.0025 m 2 A c 1.0 m s c A 2 0.25 % A EN 1536: Table 4 Minimum reinforcement of bored piles Note: In the case of compressed elements, it is better to use the reinforcement ratio as if it was a column, whilst a beam is better for piles subjected to bending. For a combination of vertical and lateral loading the CSN EN 1536 prescribes the minimum reinforcement ratio for bored piles corresponding to the proportion of the reinforcement sectional area to the concrete area (for more details visit the program help F1). We can see the use of the bending-subjected pile cross-section and the condition for the minimum reinforcement ratio in the pile dimensioning results (by clicking on the In detail button). Dialogue window Verification (detailed) 6

Analysis results Within the framework of the assessment of the laterally loaded single pile, we are interested in the courses of internal forces along the pile length, the maximum deformations and the use of the pile cross-section. For a constant course of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil k h the resultant values are as follows: Maximum pile deformation: umax = 4. 2 mm. Maximum shear force: Qmax = 85. 0 kn. Maximum bending moment: M max = 120. 0 knm. RC pile bearing capacity (flexure + pressure): 16,3 % SATISFACTORY RC pile bearing capacity (shear): 20,2 % SATISFACTORY Pile reinforcement ratio: 69,1 % SATISFACTORY 7

Comparison of the results of various methods of calculation of the modulus of subsoil reaction The values and course of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil k h will vary depending on the analysis method used and the input soil parameters that affect it. In each calculation method, different soil parameters affect the results, namely: CONSTANT: angle of dispersion, LINEAR (Bowles): angle of dispersion, 3 coefficient MN m k according to the soil type, According to CSN 73 1004: whether it is a cohesive or cohesionless soil, 3 modulus of horizontal compressibility MN m n h, According to VESIC: modulus of elasticity E MPa. When the method of calculation of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil is changed, we will need to input additional soil parameters into the program (for more information see program help F1) as follows: Modulus of subsoil MN 3 m k h reaction Angle of dispersion Coefficient 3 k MN m Modulus of elasticity E MPa Modulus of horizontal compressibility MN m n h 3 CONSTANT 10 CS 15 S-F --- --- --- LINEAR (Bowles) 10 CS 60 CS 15 S-F 150 S-F --- --- CSN 73 1004 Cohesive soil CS, firm consistency --- Cohesionless soil S-F, medium dense 4,5 VESIC --- --- 5,0 CS 15,5 S-F --- Summary table of soil parameters for horizontal bearing capacity of single pile 8

Now we will get back to the Modulus Kh frame and change the settings. We will always change the respective method of the calculation of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil and then add the necessary parameters of soils. We will carry out the procedure for the following methods: linear (according to Bowles), according to CSN 73 1004, according to Vesic. 9

Linear method (according to Bowles) Firstly, go to the frame Modulus Kh and change the settings to linear. Frame Modulus Kh Then, in the frame Soils, select the CS Sandy clay soil and click on the Edit button. Change the k coefficient to 60 MN/m 3 and click OK. Frame Soils Edit soil parameters (CS soil) 10

Repeat the same procedure for soil S-F Sand with trace of fines. This time set the k coefficient to 150 MN/m 3. Frame Soils Edit soil parameters (S-F soil) Now, go to the Horizontal bearing capacity frame, where the calculation results can be seen. 11

Frame Horizontal bearing capacity - Linear course of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil k h, deformation and internal forces 12

According to CSN 73 1004 Now go to the Modulus Kh frame again and change the method to according to CSN 73 1004. Frame Modulus Kh In the frame Soils, it is necessary to set the modulus of horizontal compressibility for the cohesionless S-F Sand with trace of fines soil. Click on the Edit button and set the value of the modulus to 4,50 MN/m 3. Frame Soils Edit soil parameters (S-F soil) 13

Now the results can be read from the Horizontal bearing capacity frame. Frame Horizontal bearing capacity - Course of modulus of subsoil reaction 73 1004, deformation and internal forces k h according to CSN 14

According to Vesic Once again, go to the Modulus Kh frame and change the settings to according to Vesic. Frame Modulus Kh In the Soils frame, it is now necessary to set the modulus of elasticity E for both soils. In the case of the CS Sandy clay soil, its value will be 5 MPa. Frame Soils Edit soil parameters (CS soil) 15

Also set the modulus for the S-F Sand with trace of fines soil. In this case, its value will be 15,50 MPa. Frame Soils Edit soil parameters (S-F soil) 16

The results can now be seen in the Horizontal bearing capacity frame. Frame Horizontal bearing capacity - Course of modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil according to Vesic, deformation and internal forces k h 17

Results of the analysis of horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile: The results of the analysis of horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile relative to the method used for the calculation of the modulus of horizontal reaction of subsoil k h are presented in the following table: Modulus of subsoil reaction MN m k h 3 Max. pile displacement u max mm Max. bending moment M max knm RC pile bearing capacity % CONSTANT 4.2 120.0 16.3 LINEAR (Bowles) 6.4 174.44 18.2 CSN 73 1004 5.6 149.87 17.3 VESIC 9.3 120.0 16.3 Summary of results Horizontal bearing capacity and dimensioning of single pile Conclusion From the calculation results, it follows that the observed values of internal forces along the pile length and the maximum deformations at the pile head are slightly different, but the influence of the chosen method of the modulus of subsoil reaction calculation is not crucial. 18