Asymmetry of the exchange rate pass-through: An exercise on the Polish data

Similar documents
Applied Econometrics and International Development Vol.9-1 (2009)

Introduction to Macroeconomics

An Empirical Analysis of RMB Exchange Rate changes impact on PPI of China

Asymmetries in central bank intervention

The transmission mechanism How the monetary-policy instrument affects the economy and the target variables

NATIONAL BANK OF POLAND WORKING PAPER No. 125

Information Bulletin 5/2010

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

Oil price and macroeconomy in Russia. Abstract

Eco 200, part 3, Fall 2004 Lars Svensson 12/6/04. Liquidity traps, the zero lower bound for interest rates, and deflation

Information Bulletin 11/2011

Queen s University Department of Economics Instructor: Kevin Andrew

Information Bulletin 9/2011

Information Bulletin 12/2003

Information Bulletin 4/2007

Information Bulletin 4/2008

Information Bulletin 5/2007

Information Bulletin 12/2008

Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Jordi Galí and Tommaso Monacelli. March 2005

Lars Svensson 10/2/05. Liquidity traps, the zero lower bound for interest rates, and deflation

Stagnation Traps. Gianluca Benigno and Luca Fornaro

Macroeconomics II. Dynamic AD-AS model

Dynamic AD-AS model vs. AD-AS model Notes. Dynamic AD-AS model in a few words Notes. Notation to incorporate time-dimension Notes

Information Bulletin 11/2010

Information Bulletin 8/2009

Final Exam. You may not use calculators, notes, or aids of any kind.

The Dornbusch overshooting model

Has the crisis changed the monetary transmission mechanism in Albania? An application of kernel density estimation technique.

Lecture 1 Introduction and Historical Notes

Gold Rush Fever in Business Cycles

Information Bulletin 2/2011

Gold Rush Fever in Business Cycles

The Neo Fisher Effect and Exiting a Liquidity Trap

Information Bulletin 10/2008

Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.

Toulouse School of Economics, Macroeconomics II Franck Portier. Homework 1. Problem I An AD-AS Model

Financial Factors in Economic Fluctuations. Lawrence Christiano Roberto Motto Massimo Rostagno

Information Bulletin 1/2008

Source: US. Bureau of Economic Analysis Shaded areas indicate US recessions research.stlouisfed.org

Identifying the Monetary Policy Shock Christiano et al. (1999)

Extended IS-LM model - construction and analysis of behavior

A Modern Equilibrium Model. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania

4- Current Method of Explaining Business Cycles: DSGE Models. Basic Economic Models

Information Bulletin 6/2008

A Dynamic Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply

Topic 4 Forecasting Exchange Rate

Online Appendix for Investment Hangover and the Great Recession

THE LONG-RUN DETERMINANTS OF MONEY DEMAND IN SLOVAKIA MARTIN LUKÁČIK - ADRIANA LUKÁČIKOVÁ - KAROL SZOMOLÁNYI

Lecture 3, November 30: The Basic New Keynesian Model (Galí, Chapter 3)

Relationships between phases of business cycles in two large open economies

Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules

Monetary Economics. Lecture 15: unemployment in the new Keynesian model, part one. Chris Edmond. 2nd Semester 2014

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS 63. P f. P d. = e n

Adverse Effects of Monetary Policy Signalling

The welfare cost of energy insecurity

The Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. November 2010

Information Bulletin 7/2007

Business Cycles and Exchange Rate Regimes

Information Bulletin 9/2007

Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. December 4, 2007

The Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. June 2008

The Dynamics of the U.S. Trade Balance and the Real Exchange Rate: The J Curve and Trade Costs? by George Alessandria (Rochester) Horag Choi (Monash)

The Central Bank of Iceland forecasting record

LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

Monetary Economics: Problem Set #4 Solutions

Inflation Report April June 2012

Latent variables and shocks contribution in DSGE models with occasionally binding constraints

Dynamics and Monetary Policy in a Fair Wage Model of the Business Cycle

Melitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano. Peter Eppinger. July 22, 2011

ADVANCED MACROECONOMICS I

Nonlinear Exchange Rate Pass-Through : Does Business Cycle Matter? Abstract

Melitz, M. J. & G. I. P. Ottaviano. Peter Eppinger. July 22, 2011

Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment

The New Keynesian Model: Introduction

Does Pleasing Export-Oriented Foreign Investors Help Your. Balance of Payments? A General Equilibrium Analysis. (Available on Request Appendix)

Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment

Problem Set 4. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2011 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

Monetary Policy and Unemployment: A New Keynesian Perspective

Identifying Aggregate Liquidity Shocks with Monetary Policy Shocks: An Application using UK Data

Monetary Policy in a Macro Model

Forecasting the Canadian Dollar Exchange Rate Wissam Saleh & Pablo Navarro

Macroeconomics Theory II

Modeling the Global Wheat Market Using a GVAR Model. Elselien Breman and Cornelis Gardebroek

International Macro Finance

IS-LM Analysis. Math 202. Brian D. Fitzpatrick. Duke University. February 14, 2018 MATH

MA Macroeconomics 3. Introducing the IS-MP-PC Model

Demand Shocks, Monetary Policy, and the Optimal Use of Dispersed Information

Product Introductions, Currency Unions, and the Real Exchange Rate

Monetary Economics: Solutions Problem Set 1

Can News be a Major Source of Aggregate Fluctuations?

S TICKY I NFORMATION Fabio Verona Bank of Finland, Monetary Policy and Research Department, Research Unit

Learning about Monetary Policy using (S)VARs? Some Pitfalls and Possible Solutions

Euro-indicators Working Group

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Economics 134 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Spring 2018 Professor David Romer LECTURE 10

The 2001 recession displayed unique characteristics in comparison to other

Seoul National University Mini-Course: Monetary & Fiscal Policy Interactions II

APPENDIX TO RESERVE REQUIREMENTS AND OPTIMAL CHINESE STABILIZATION POLICY

Economics 232c Spring 2003 International Macroeconomics. Problem Set 3. May 15, 2003

The Lucas Imperfect Information Model

Exchange Rate Nonlinearities in India s Exports to the US

Transcription:

National Bank of Poland Asymmetry of the exchange rate pass-through: An exercise on the Polish data Jan Przystupa Ewa Wróbel 0th Annual NBP - SNB Seminar June 4, 03 Zurich

PLN/USD fluctuations Band +/-5% Floating exchange rate (April 998) EU accession (May 004)

The exchange rate Exchange rate vs. inflation 00 90 80 70 crow ling peg to a currency basket crowling peg to a currency basket + crawling band floating exchange rate 0 90 70 60 50 50 40 30 0 0 00 fixed exchange rate 99-0 99-0 99-07 993-04 994-0 994-0 995-07 996-04 997-0 997-0 Inflation (left scale) 998-07 999-04 000-0 000-0 00-07 00-04 003-0 NER (right scale) 003-0 004-07 005-04 006-0 006-0 007-07 008-04 009-0 009-0 30 0 90 70 50

MOTIVATION Understanding how prices respond to exchange rate is of key importance for any open economy. An extra stimulus: FAQ: What is an impact of currerent depreciation (appreciation) on consumer prices? Does it depend on the scale of the ex changes or on the phase of the business cycle? What is the pricing policy of the foreign exporting firms towards the Polish market? To answer these questions we propose a complex investigation of the exchange rate channel of the monetary transmission mechanism for an open economy with the floating exchange rate regime.

First: we assessed the level of the exchange rate pass-through. Based on McCarthy (999) where the impact of a sequence of supply, demand and exchange rate shocks on the import, producer and consumer prices is examined. Since it is a popular method we used it for the sake of comparability with other studies and to have an idea about the level of the pass-through effect in Poland. Flowchart of the pass-through effect. Money (M3) Interest rate oil price (Brent, in USD) (supply shock) output gap (demand shock) NEER (30% USD; 70% EUR) CPI PPI Import prices (in domestic currency)

McCarthy s model (999) πm - index of the import transaction prices expressed in the domestic currency; εm - unexpected change of the import price ( π m ) + αε s + αε d + α ε e m m = Et 3 ε π + πw - price index of the sold production of industry (PPI); εw - unexpected change of the production price ( π w ) + β ε s + β ε d + β ε e + β ε m w π + w = Et 3 4 ε πc - consumption price index (CPI); εc - unexpected change of the CPI Coefficients explain a part of the shock assigned to the corresponding variable ( π c ) + γ ε s + γ ε d + γ ε e + γ ε m + γ ε w c π + c = Et 3 4 5 ε

Exchange rate pass-through. Estimation based on the McCarthy s SVAR PT ( z t ) h = z e t, t+ h t, t+ h Pass-through effect: changes of the variable z (import, production, consumption prices) from t to t+h being the response on the exchange rate changes between t and t+h Pass-through effect after Import transaction prices (PM) for Price index of the sold production of industry (PPI) Consumption price index CPI) quarters 4 quarters 8 quarters Est.0 Est. Est.0 Est. Est.0 Est. 0.5 0.46 0.69 0.67 0.79 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.50 0.33 0.59 0.38 0.7 0.0 0.36 0.6 0.4 0.8

Exchange rate pass-through. Estimation based on the McCarthy s SVAR Time decomposition of the pass-through effect. Time decomposition of the pass-through effect for (total P-T=00) Quarter after shock Q 0 Q Q Q 3 Q 4 -Q 8 Import transaction prices (PM) 7 49 5 4 5 Price index of the sold production of industry (PPI) 35 9 0 4 Consumption price index CPI) 0 4 3 7 0

Assessing the level of the exchange rate pass-through to the import prices and pricing to market (PTM) with cointegration technics. Cointergating vector, exchange rate - NEER p = α + α e + α p + α p + α y + ε IMP F H H t 0 t t 3 t 4 t t VECM (cointegration Johansen), - t stat in [ ] unrestricted α - 0.9 [5.9] α.44 [.] α (If significant then PTM exists) 3 0.95 [5.9] α (If significant then PT is full) Chi - square=0.56, p. 0.45 restricted: α = α - 0.8 [7.50] α 0.8 [7.50] α.3 [7.65] 3 restricted: α = restricted: α = α =, 3 α = (Law of one price) Chi - square=9.64, p. 0.008 α =0 (Unit homogeneity) Chi - square=., p. 0.0 restricted: α = α = (Unit coeff. at EX & FP) Chi - square=0., p. 0.006

EX pass-through to the import prices Cointegrating vector, bilateral exchange rate EUR/PLN p = + e + p + p + y + α α α α α ε IMP F H H t 0 t t 3 t 4 t t VECM (cointegration Johansen),t- stat in [ ] Fully modified least squares t - stat in [ ] unrestricted α - 0.7 [.47] -0.68 [4.73] α 0.4 [0.35] 0.74 [.09] α 0.83 [.7] 0.8 [4. 4] 3 restricted: α = α Chi - square=0.03, p. 0.86 Chi - square=0.08, p. 0.9 α - 0.78 [5.8] -0.67 [7.5] α 0.78 [5.8] 0.67 [7.5] α 0.7 [7.] 0.84 [5.9] 3 restricted: α = α = Chi - square=7.4, p. 0.06 Chi - square=.46, p. 0.00 restricted: α = α =, α 3 =0 Chi - square=7.49, p. 0.058 Chi - square=60, p. 0.000 restricted: α = α = Chi - square=6.87, p. 0.03 Chi - square=40.0, p. 0.000

4 4 4 4 IMP F H IMP t β0 β t β, i t i β3, i t i β4, i t i β5, i t i t i= 0 i= 0 i= 0 i= p = + EC + e + p + p + p + v Table A. Dynamic import price equation Variable Coefficient t-stat β 0.00 0.6 0 β -0.464-3.0 β 0.5 3.94,0 β PTM 0.898.8 4,0 Return to equilibrium EX pass-through (short term) Dynamic import price equations Table A. Dynamic import price eq uation: appreciation of the EUR /PLN, usa ble obs.: 4. Variable Coefficient t - stat, p - value in ( ) A β - 0.003-0.6 (0.874) 0 A β - 0.654 -.96 (0.008) A β,0 0.55.58 (0.3) A β 4,0.9.8 (0.09) A t = t { if e 0 0 otherwise Table A 3. Dynamic import price equ ation: depreciation of the EUR /PLN, usable obs.: 0 Variable Coefficient t - stat β - 0.0055-0.39 D 0 D β - 0.5 -.03 D β,0 0.59.07 D β 4,0 0.77. D t = t { if e 0 0 otherwise

Dynamic import price equations 4 4 4 4 IMP F H IMP t β0 β t β, i t i β3, i t i β4, i t i β5, i t i t i= 0 i= 0 i= 0 i= p = + EC + e + p + p + p + v Table A4. Dynamic import price equation: positive EC, usable obs.:. Variable Coefficient t-stat β + 0.0083 0.08 EC 0 EC β + -0.3-0.63 EC β +,0 0.66 4.7 EC β + 4,0 0.003 0.003 Table A5. Dynamic import price equation: negative EC, usable obs.: 3. Variable Coefficient t-stat β -0.09 -.6 EC 0 EC β -0.65 -.0 EC β,0 0.6 0.8 EC β 4,0.0 3.39 EC+ import prices are lower than the equilibrium level determined by exporters prices and domestic prices EC- import prices are higher than the equilibrium level determined by exporters prices and domestic prices

Exchange rate pass-through models based on the Phillips curve π = α Eπ + ( α α ) π + α ( e ) + α y + ε qi qi qi qi qi r qi tk,, k t t+, k, k t, k t 3, k t t where: π stands for inflation (CPI); qi is a variable (i= 4) stands for: i= output gap (y); i= nominal effective exchange rate ( e); i=3 volatility of the nominal effective exchange rate (s); i=4 inflation (π): actual inflation inflation target (π*); k=,; Threshold estimated with SETAR (Self-Exciting Threshold AutoRegresive) model k= for qi > τ (τ = threshold); k= for qi τ k=3,4; Investigate nonreversibility of the linear functions through segmenting the variables. k=3 for qi > qi- k=4 for qi qi- r et is a nominal effective exchange rate (in log) plus foreign inflation (HICP in the euro zone; in log)

The economic interpretation of the threshold model and model based on nonreversibility of the linear functions % 3 0 Threshold models Nonreversible linear models t t0 recession expansion Nonreversible linear models t>t0 EU accession Threshold models - Russian crisis Threshold models - -3 997Q 997Q3 998Q 998Q3 999Q 999Q3 000Q 000Q3 00Q 00Q3 00Q 00Q3 slump 003Q 003Q3 004Q 004Q3 005Q 005Q3 006Q 006Q3 prosperity 007Q 007Q3 008Q 008Q3 output gap threshold business cycle

The economic interpretation of the threshold model and model based on nonreversibility of the linear functions Inflation - target inflation (π - π * ) Early recession = t r a cost t r = a t cos θ θ Late expansion Early expansion Output gap (y) Late recession Two-leaf clover curve

Asymmetry of the exchange rate passthrough to CPI related to: The asymmetry of the exchange rate pass-through to the consumer prices Threshold models (τ = threshold) Nonreversible linear models variable > τ variable τ t > t 0 t t 0 Output gap (y) nominal effective exchange rate ( e) τ = 0.4% 0.9 0.79 τ =.08% 0.065 0.39 0.74 0.09 0.08 0.38 Volatility of the nominal effective exchange rate (s) Inflation (π) Pass-through (general) τ = 4.3% 0.47 0.549 τ = level of official inflation target 0.95 0.0 0.9 0.39 0.4 0.60 0.83

The asymmetry of the exchange rate pass-through to the consumer prices 3 Recession Expansion 0,4 EU accession 0,35 0,3 0 - Russian crisis Average pass-through 0,5 0, 0,5 pass-through effect Max. pass-through 0, - -3 997Q 997Q3 Average pass-through 998Q 998Q3 999Q Min. pass-through 999Q3 000Q 000Q3 00Q 00Q3 00Q 00Q3 Average pass-through 003Q 003Q3 004Q 004Q3 005Q 005Q3 006Q 006Q3 007Q 007Q3 008Q 008Q3 output gap pass-through effect (right scale) proxy of the business cycle This is coherent with the behavior of enterprises in the business cycle, conditioning their investment decisions on expected profits with a maximum in the early expansion and a minimum in the early recession. The enterprises propensity to change prices follows profit expectations. 0,05 0

Exchange rate pass-through and inflation. I q`08 II q'08 III q'08 IV q'08 I q`09 II q'09 III q'09 IV q'09 I q`0 II q'0 III q'0 IV q'0 I q` II q' III q' IV q' I q` II q' III q' IV q' I q`3 Linear PT -0,65-0,684-0,59-0,56 0,84 0,44 0,8-0,05-0,0-0,070 0,056 0,0-0,83-0,35-0,047 0,77,4 0,50-0,06-0,49-0,60 Asym.PT -0,573-0,707-0,783-0,57,707,646,99-0,404-0,64-0,339 0,05 0,065-0,90-0,46-0,067 0,509 0,885 0,356-0,08-0,77-0,7 Figures shown in the table indicate by how many percentage points inflation in a given quarter would be higher (-) or lower (+) than the counterfactual inflation that assumes no exchange rate changes. A year on year impact is calculated as an average impact in the consecutive four quarters.

THANK YOU