THE HEAVY ION BEAM PROBE

Similar documents
The Plasma Phase. Chapter 1. An experiment - measure and understand transport processes in a plasma. Chapter 2. An introduction to plasma physics

The Analyzer. We will deal mainly with magnetic sector instruments here although we will talk briefly about other separation methods later.

Chapter 23 Electric Potential. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Edge and Internal Transport Barrier Formations in CHS. Identification of Zonal Flows in CHS and JIPPT-IIU

Experimental test of the neoclassical theory of poloidal rotation

Final Exam. PHY2049 Fall11

Relating the L-H Power Threshold Scaling to Edge Turbulence Dynamics

Using a Microwave Interferometer to Measure Plasma Density Mentor: Prof. W. Gekelman. P. Pribyl (UCLA)

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy. 2. Electron Optics

Chapter test: Probing the Heart of Matter

Lecture 22 Ion Beam Techniques

PHY2049 Fall11. Final Exam Solutions (1) 700 N (2) 350 N (3) 810 N (4) 405 N (5) 0 N

Interface (backside) & Extraction Lens

Impedance/Reactance Problems

Uncertainty principle

Theory English (Official)

Heating and current drive: Radio Frequency

An ion follows a circular path in a uniform magnetic field. Which single change decreases the radius of the path?

DIAGNOSTICS FOR ADVANCED TOKAMAK RESEARCH

Single Particle Motion

Courtesy of ESS and TheRGA web pages part of a series of application and theory notes for public use which are provided free of charge by ESS.

1P22/1P92 Exam Review Problems 2013 Friday, January 14, :03 AM. Chapter 20

Wednesday 21 June 2017 Morning Time allowed: 2 hours 15 minutes

SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS

and another with a peak frequency ω 2

Toroidal confinement devices

A Multi-beamlet Injector for Heavy Ion Fusion: Experiments and Modeling

Confinement of toroidal non-neutral plasma

Heat Transport in a Stochastic Magnetic Field. John Sarff Physics Dept, UW-Madison

Neoclassical transport

Particle Pinch Model of Passing/Trapped High-Z Impurity with Centrifugal Force Effect )

Bifurcation-Like Behavior of Electrostatic Potential in LHD )

Laser wakefield electron acceleration to multi-gev energies

Additional Heating Experiments of FRC Plasma

Neutral beam plasma heating

Turbulence and Transport The Secrets of Magnetic Confinement

Progress of Confinement Physics Study in Compact Helical System

PFC/JA NEUTRAL BEAM PENETRATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR CIT

EX/4-6Rb Electrostatic fluctuation and fluctuation-induced particle flux during formation of the edge transport barrier in the JFT-2M tokamak

Penning Traps. Contents. Plasma Physics Penning Traps AJW August 16, Introduction. Clasical picture. Radiation Damping.

TURBULENT TRANSPORT THEORY

Workout Examples No.of nucleons Binding energy

Induction_P1. 1. [1 mark]

Studies of Charge Separation Characteristics for Higher Density Plasma. in a Direct Energy Converter Using Slanted Cusp Magnetic Field

AP Physics C Mechanics Objectives

Direct drive by cyclotron heating can explain spontaneous rotation in tokamaks

Selected "Phacts" for the Physics Regents Exam You Should Know

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN Department of Physics and Engineering Physics

Plasma spectroscopy when there is magnetic reconnection associated with Rayleigh-Taylor instability in the Caltech spheromak jet experiment

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 35. Chem 4631

ICPMS Doherty Lecture 1

Inter-linkage of transports and its bridging mechanism

Ratio of Charge to Mass for the Electron

Development of Large Scale Optimization Tools for Beam Tracking Codes

Particle physics experiments

PHYSICS 202 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 12, 2004, 8-10 am SECTION:

CHARGE TO MASS RATIO FOR THE ELECTRON

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

object objective lens eyepiece lens

Sample Examination Questions

KE = 1 2 mv2 = ev. (1)

Abstract. Department of Physics. University of Wisconsin UCLA UCLA

Energetic-Ion-Driven MHD Instab. & Transport: Simulation Methods, V&V and Predictions

Week 5: Fourier Tranform-based Mass Analyzers: FT-ICR and Orbitrap

The RFP: Plasma Confinement with a Reversed Twist

0 Magnetically Confined Plasma

2. X-ray Sources 2.1 Electron Impact X-ray Sources - Types of X-ray Source - Bremsstrahlung Emission - Characteristic Emission

A) m B) m C) m D) m E) m. 5. Which one of the following circuits has the largest resistance?

Fluctuation Suppression during the ECH Induced Potential Formation in the Tandem Mirror GAMMA 10

Experimental Investigations of Magnetic Reconnection. J Egedal. MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA

Larbert High School. Quanta and Waves. Homework Exercises ADVANCED HIGHER PHYSICS

Fokker-Planck Simulation Study of Hot-Tail Effect on Runaway Electron Generation in ITER Disruptions )

2. What are the 4 steps of the Scientific Method as described by Mr. Martin?

January 2017 Qualifying Exam

Project P2 - The weak charge of the proton

What will the electric field be like inside the cavity?

Physics 222, Spring 2010 Quiz 3, Form: A

Simulation Study of Interaction between Energetic Ions and Alfvén Eigenmodes in LHD

Class XII_Delhi_Physics_Set-1

Introduction Introduction


Reduction of Turbulence and Transport in the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak by Dilution of Deuterium Ions with Nitrogen and Neon Injection

CHARGED PARTICLES IN FIELDS

Fig. 2.1 I =... A [2] Suggest why it would be impossible for overhead cables carrying an alternating current to float in the Earth s magnetic field.

Fast Ion Confinement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch

Accelerator Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).

The Madison Dynamo Experiment: magnetic instabilities driven by sheared flow in a sphere. Cary Forest Department of Physics University of Wisconsin

DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE SCALE OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR BEAM TRACKING CODES*

CEE 772 Lecture #27 12/10/2014. CEE 772: Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis

MAGNETIC DEFLECTION. OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of a magnetic field on an electron beam. To measure the Earth s magnetic field.

ª 10 KeV. In 2XIIB and the tandem mirrors built to date, in which the plug radius R p. ª r Li

CEE 772: Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis

g E. An object whose weight on 6 Earth is 5.0 N is dropped from rest above the Moon s surface. What is its momentum after falling for 3.0s?

~1 V ~20-40 V. Electron collector PLASMA. Ion extraction optics. Ionization zone. Mass Resolving section Ion detector. e - ~20 V Filament Heater

PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 2018 H2 PHYSICS 9749/01. Paper 1 SEP 2018

EFFECT OF PLASMA FLOWS ON TURBULENT TRANSPORT AND MHD STABILITY*

2.1 The electric field outside a charged sphere is the same as for a point source, E(r) =

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

INTRODUCTION. Introduction. Discrete charges: Electric dipole. Continuous charge distributions. Flux of a vector field

OVERVIEW OF THE ALCATOR C-MOD PROGRAM. IAEA-FEC November, 2004 Alcator Team Presented by Martin Greenwald MIT Plasma Science & Fusion Center

Transcription:

THE HEAVY ION BEAM PROBE CONTENTS Principles of operation Apparatus ions source accelerator beam bending system sweep plates analyzer Sample volumes Space potential Space potential fluctuations Density fluctuations Two-point measurements wave numbers coherence particle flux Line-Integral effects Finite sample volume effects Magnetic field measurements p 9.1

PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION A continuous beam of singly charged heavy ions, typically Tl + or Cs +, is accelerated to an energy Wp 0.1 to 0.5 MeV and guided into the plasma. Gyro radius: r b = 1.02 10 4 µ 1/ 2 Z 1 W p 1/ 2 B 1 The primary beam is continuously ionized along its path, predominantly by collisions with plasma electrons: Tl + + e - Tl ++ + 2e - The secondary beam so produced has a radius half that of the primary beam (Z is doubled), so that the primary and secondary beams diverge. An energy analyzer collects a small fraction of the secondary beam. p 9.2

Z sample volume accelerator primary beam φ R, Y X secondary beam analyzer The observed secondary beam comes from a unique location within the plasma, the sample volume (sv). The analyzer measures the secondary beam (kinetic) energy Ws, the position of the secondary beam on a detector plate within the analyzer, and the secondary beam intensity. p 9.3

SIMPLE VIEW OF POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS The electrostatic potential at the sample volume, Φsv, is measured by the difference between the secondary and primary beam energy, Ws and Wp. A primary ion with charge qp = Zpe loses qpφsv of kinetic energy in reaching the sample volume. This process is path independent. The secondary ion with charge qs gains qsφsv of kinetic energy between the sample volume and the energy analyzer. The analyzer measures the kinetic energy of the secondary ion, W s = W p + ( q s q p )Φ sv p 9.4

SIMPLE VIEW OF DENSITY MEASUREMENTS The electron density n e in the sample volume is determined from the secondary current Is: I s = I p n e δlσ eff q s q p, I p = q p n b v b S Ip is the primary current at the sample volume; σ eff = σ ( v r )v r v b σ ( v e)v e v b σ(vr) is cross section for electron impact ionization, vr = vbve ve is relative speed between beam ions (vb) and plasma electrons (ve), <...> means averaging over plasma electron energy distribution, S is beam cross sectional area, δl is sample volume length, n b is beam density p 9.5

2.0 10-15 σ eff (cm 2 ) 1.0 10-15 effective cross section Tl + to Tl ++ 500keV 0.0 10 0 T e (ev) 0 1000 2000 Measure a detector current I d I s : I d I = s = I d I s n e n e p 9.6

SIMPLE VIEW OF MAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS The primary beam is injected approximately in the (Y, Z) plane. For a tokamak the dominant beam bending is also in the plane (Y, Z), determined by the toroidal field Bφ. However there is also beam bending in the plane (X, Y) due to poloidal fields. Therefore by measuring the beam displacement in the toroidal or X direction information on poloidal fields, produced by toroidal currents, is available. The fluctuating components of toroidal displacement, produced by fluctuating poloidal fields, are easiest to measure. Z sample volume accelerator primary beam φ R, Y X secondary beam analyzer p 9.7

APPARATUS p 9.8

The ion source. Heat Tl (202.97 and 204.97 amu) or Cs (133) loaded zeolite. Future developments: plasma sources The accelerator. The thermal ions are extracted, focused and accelerated. Typically a Gaussian intensity profile with radius 0.2 to 1cm, and a current Ip0 200 µa. A 5 MeV accelerator would allow beam probing of TFTR. source Pierce diode Einzel lens acceleration tube quadrupoles beam width Beam bending system. Electrostatic bending systems are used to direct the beam into the plasma. Sweep plates. Electrostatic deflection plates can be included in the primary beam line to sweep the primary beam in the (Y, Z) plane (a radial sweep), and another pair to sweep in the (X, Y) plane (a toroidal sweep). p 9.9

Primary beam detectors. Two planes of parallel wires; the wires in one plane are perpendicular to the wires in the second plane. The beam intensity profile is determined by scanning the beam across one wire. p 9.10

THE PARALLEL PLATE ANALYZER A schematic showing the entrance slit, detector system, and ground plane. insulators top plate (high voltage) guard rings ground plate entrance slits split plate detectors The analyzer gain G(θ) is defined by the ratio of the input secondary beam energy Ws to the voltage VA required to center (i.e. balance) the secondary beam on the split plate detector set Then q s G( θ) = W s W A balance Φ sv = q s G( θ )V A ( balance) q p V p q s q p p 9.11

Typical gain curve Problems: What is the entrance angle? p 9.12

THE SPLIT PLATES One split plate assembly with the finite size beam footprint. Measure Id = (1+γs)Is with γs 3. UL UR 0.2 cm DL DR BEAM Itot = I UL +I DL +I UR +I DR LR = [(I UL +I DL )-(I UR +I DR )]/Itot UD = [(I UL +I UR )-(I DL +I DR )]/Itot p 9.13

Basic measurement Combination Physics intensity I tot n intensity fluctuations: I tot / I tot n / n up/down UD Φ up/down fluctuations: UD Φ left/right: LR B θ left/right fluctuations: Problems: Minimize ultraviolet light. LR B θ Maintain the secondary beam in the plane of the analyzer; apparent energy = Wscos2(α). Maintain electric field correctly p 9.14

SAMPLE VOLUMES primary beam approximately 0.6 cm diameter sample volumes height each volume is a disk, radius about 0.5 cm, thickness < 1 mm, separation about 2 cm flux surface primary beam major radius p 9.15

A detection grid. p 9.16

Adjacent sample volumes. p 9.17

SPACE POTENTIAL, MORE DETAILS Trajectory through plasma b Work = F dl = q E dl a b = q Φ dl = q dφ = May not be purely electrostatic: a E = Φ A t b a b a q( Φ b Φ a ) Change in energy W measured by the analyzer, with qp = e and qs = 2e, is W = eφ sv e sv a A t dl - 2e b sv A t dl Primary and secondary beams are almost in the poloidal plane (Y, Z), so only the time variation of the poloidal and radial components of A matter-generally very small. If the primary beam is allowed to pass directly into the analyzer, then any measured energy change comes only from the time derivatives of the vector potential. p 9.18

POTENTIAL PROFILES ( ) = q s V A G θ Φ sv q s q p [ ] ( ) f ( θ) UD cos 2 ( α) q p V p i.e. fix V A and monitor UD. A potential profile obtained in TEXT. Only relative values of Φsv are determined. p 9.19

SPACE POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS The signal UD fluctuates. 'Cross talk' will appear for fluctuation wavelengths small enough such that density variations exist across the small dimension of the sample volume. p 9.20

IS IT ELECTROSTATIC? 2 A = µ 0 j = µ 0 η A Φ + t For the parallel fluctuating component of A we have 2 A = µ 0 j = µ 0 η ( Φ iωa ) The electrostatic limit corresponds to Φ >>iω A or k 2 >> µ 0 ω η Any fluctuating UD observed on primary is from time varying magnetic fields ONLY. p 9.21

secondaries primary The prominent feature between 20 and 50 khz is electromagnetic p 9.22

DENSITY FLUCTUATIONS The secondary current at the detector is sv Σ I sd = 2I p0 exp n e σ eff,1 dl 1 ( R Σ n 0 e σ eff,1,2 dl)exp n e σ eff,2 dl 2 sv where Σ σ eff,α = σ eff,α,β β>α i For small fluctuation amplitudes: I tot I = s,d = n e ( sv) I tot I s,d n e ( sv) sv n e σ R Σ Σ eff,1dl 1 n e σ eff,2 dl 2 0 sv p 9.23

Profiles of TEXT n e ne rms (circles) and Φ Te (triangles) in rms p 9.24

TWO-POINT MEASUREMENTS P ω ( r 1,r 2 ) = S ω γ ω ( r 1,r 2 )e iφ ω ( r 1,r 2 ) [ ( ) P ω ( r 2,r 2 )] 1 2 S ω = P ω r 1,r 1 γ ω ( r 1,r 2 ) = P ω ( r 1,r 2 ) P ω ( r 1 ) 1/ 2 P ω ( r 2 ) 1/ 2 φ ω ( r 1,r 2 ) = arg P ω ( r 1,r 2 ) This allows the average wave number kω to be calculated: ( ) = φ ω ( r 1,r 2 ) k ω r 1,r 2 r 1 r 2 p 9.25

( ) = φ ω ( r 1,r 2 ) k ω r 1,r 2 r 1 r 2 Phase and coherence. Sample volumes poloidally separated by d = 2.4 cm (solid line) and 4.7 cm (broken line) at r/a 0.75. φ ω is smoothly varying with f = ω/2π for the 2.4 cm separation, so that k is unambiguous. vph = ω/k(ω) is about 6x105 cms-1. γ = exp(-d/lc)2), and lc 4 cm. p 9.26

THE PARTICLE FLUX Γ r = n v r Γ r = 2 B = n ( t) E r ( t) B Re P n E ω 0 0 [ ( )dω ] = 1 B n rmsφ rms ( ω )k θ ( ω) γ n Φ ( ω ) sin ( α n Φ ( ω ) )dω Electrostatic turbulence driven particle flux from HIBP and probes, and the total particle flux Γi(Hα) from spectroscopy. p 9.27

LINE-INTEGRAL EFFECTS 1) Beam attenuation limits the HIBP's ability to probe the center of the machine. The experimentally measured sum signal Itot (solid line) in na and the simulated secondary current (broken line) as a fraction of the primary beam current. 2) Fluctuations along primary and secondary beam corrupts measurement of n. Two key dimensionless factors, neσ eff L 1 and lc/l << 1. Higher densities or cross sections (more beam attenuation), or smaller values of klc, are worse. For n > 4x1019 m-3 in TEXT these effects should appear. Higher V A implies smaller σ eff, and smaller effects. p 9.28

FINITE SAMPLE-VOLUME EFFECTS There are three important effects to consider: filtering of higher wave numbers, reducing apparent phase, and increasing apparent coherence. All three have been quantified using a model for the turbulence based on Gaussian statistics. They are negligible as long as b < lc and b < 1/k, where 2b is the sample volume dimension, lc the correlation length and k an average wave number along b. p 9.29

MAGNETIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS Toroidal or left-right (LR) motion LR of the secondary beam across the detector plates gives information on poloidal fields. Computed primary and secondary beam trajectories, projected in the horizontal plane, for three different toroidal steering angles. The fields include a rippled toroidal field (i.e. not toroidally symmetric), together with plasma equilibrium fields. p 9.30

MAGNETIC FLUCTUATIONS IN TOROIDAL SYMMETRY Toroidal component of canonical momentum of charged particle with mass m, toroidal velocity vφ, is conserved: P φ = mrv φ + qra φ = constant Apply to the primary beam between the source (subscript 0) and the ionization point (subscript i) in the sample volume: mr 0 v φ0 + er 0 A φ0 = mr i v φi + er i A φi Apply to the secondary ion between the ionization point and the detector (subscript d): mr i v φi + 2eR i A φi = mr d v φd + 2eR d A φd At ionization point the primary and secondary ions have the same value of vφ. Therefore A φi = m e R d v R φd R 0 v i R φ0 i + 2 R d A R φd R 0 A i R φ0 i i.e. the toroidal velocity of the secondary ion at the detector vφd carries information about the vector potential Aφi at the sample volume, if the system is toroidally symmetric. Considering fluctuations which decay rapidly in space, so that A φ0 = A φd = 0, A φi = m e R d R i v φd p 9.31

Problems 1) we do not measure v φd, but rather LR. 2) the tokamak fields are not axisymmetric. Therefore use "toroidal symmetry" result for A φ as a first iteration in a particle trajectory simulation to predict displacement at detector. Iterate assumed A φ until measured and computed displacement agree. p 9.32