Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Similar documents
Galaxy simulations in the Gaia era. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

PATRICIA B. TISSERA. Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics Argentina

Galaxy Evolution at High Resolution: The New View of the Milky Way's Disc. Jo Bovy (University of Toronto; Canada Research Chair)

Distribution of Mass in the Milky Way Galaxy, Leiden, July Laura V. Sales. Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands

The Structure and Substructure of the Milky Way Galaxy Discs. Rosemary Wyse

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

The role of radial migration in shaping the stellar populations of spiral galaxies

Action-based Dynamical Modeling of the Milky Way Disk with Gaia & RAVE

Secular Evolution of Galaxies

Following the evolution of the Galactic disc with Open Clusters

The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

Galactic archaeology with the RAdial Velocity Experiment

Gaia ITNG2013 School, Tenerife. Ken Freeman, Lecture 2: the thin disk

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

DOES THE MILKY WAY HAVE AN ACCRETED DISK COMPONENT?

The Thick Thin Disk and the Thin Thick Disk: a New Paradigm from Gaia

Milky Way S&G Ch 2. Milky Way in near 1 IR H-W Rixhttp://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/galarcheo-c15/rix/

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Chemical evolution of the Galactic disk using Open Clusters

Cosmologia locale: origine e storia della Via Lattea

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Radial migration of the Sun in the Milky Way: a statistical study

Correlations between stellar dynamics and metallicity in the discs

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Ricardo Schiavon

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

The structure and formation of the Milky Way disks

Exploring the structure and evolu4on of the Milky Way disk

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 26 Jan 2018

Surface Brightness of Spiral Galaxies

Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

Epicycles the short form.

Gaia-LSST Synergy. A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova

Small Scale Structure in the Galaxy. Alice Quillen (University of Rochester)

The chemical evolution of the Milky Way

Constraints on secular evolution in unbarred spiral galaxies: understanding bulge and disk formation

Galactic Bulge Science

Galactic dynamics reveals Galactic history

Chemo-Dynamical evolution of dwarf spheroidal galaxies

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

Milky Way s Mass and Stellar Halo Velocity Dispersion Profiles

Constraining the Milky Way assembly history with Galactic Archaeology

Tristan Cantat-Gaudin

Low-velocity streams in the solar neighbourhood caused by the Galactic bar

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

Migration and kinematics in growing disc galaxies with thin and thick discs

Three Major Components

Spiral Structure. m ( Ω Ω gp ) = n κ. Closed orbits in non-inertial frames can explain the spiral pattern

Modelling the Milky Way: challenges in scientific computing and data analysis. Matthias Steinmetz

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Jun 2010

The Milky Way Part 3 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2011 part 8

IAU Symposium #254, Copenhagen June 2008 Simulations of disk galaxy formation in their cosmological context

The Milky Way in the cosmological context. Andrey Kravtsov The University of Chicago

Renegades in the Solar neighborhood

Coordinate Systems! The geometry of the stream requires an oblate near-spherical halo!

The Milky Way Part 2 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 7

WEAVE Galactic Surveys

Astronomisches Rechen-Institut Heidelberg, Germany. The evolution history of the extended solar neighbourhood

Impacts of a flaring star-forming disc and stellar radial mixing on the vertical metallicity gradient

Evolution of galactic discs: multiple patterns, radial migration and disc outskirts

Lecture 28: Spiral Galaxies Readings: Section 25-4, 25-5, and 26-3

1.4 Galaxy Light Distributions

Probing the history of star formation in the Local Group using the galactic fossil record

Dwarf Galaxies as Cosmological Probes

Gaia DR2 and/versus RAVE DR5: application for the semi-analytic thin disk model

Galaxy classification

Supernova Feedback in Low and High Mass Galaxies: Luke Hovey 10 December 2009

stelle e galassie primordiali

r-process enrichment traced by Pu and Ba near the sun and in the Draco

Milky Way s Anisotropy Profile with LAMOST/SDSS and Gaia

Basics of Galactic chemical evolution

Spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way

Barred Galaxies. Morphology Gas in barred galaxies Dynamics: pattern speed Theory: secular evolution, resonances

What do we need to know about galaxy formation?

Overview of Dynamical Modeling. Glenn van de Ven

Astronomy. Astrophysics. Evolution of galactic discs: multiple patterns, radial migration, and disc outskirts

Bright Cluster Galaxy formation and the role of AGN feedback. Romain Teyssier

Theoretical ideas About Galaxy Wide Star Formation! Star Formation Efficiency!

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

PE#4: It contains some useful diagrams and formula which we ll use today

Galaxy Formation: Overview

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

Search for streams in thick disk and halo of the Milky Way

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ga] 27 May 2015

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Nov 1999

How Massive is the Milky Way?

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

The Star Clusters of the Magellanic Clouds

Overview of Gaia-ESO Survey results based on high-resolution spectra of FGK-type stars Rodolfo Smiljanic! (Gaia-ESO WG11 co-coordinator)

Is the Milky Way ringing? The hunt for high-velocity streams

Galaxies. With a touch of cosmology

Age and abundance structure of the central sub-kpc of the Milky Way

Astr 5465 Feb. 5, 2018 Kinematics of Nearby Stars

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 6 Jun 2017

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 7 Jan 2018

A new mechanism for the formation of PRGs

Matthias Steinmetz. 16 Oct 2012 Science from the Next Generation Imaging and Spectroscopic Surveys 1

Myung Gyoon Lee. With Ho Seong Hwang (CfA) and Hong Soo Park (NAOJ) (Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University)

Transcription:

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Talk outline Effect of disk asymmetries on disk dynamics. Radial migration in galactic disks. Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Chemo-kinematic observational constraints.

Resonances in galactic disks Corotation resonance (CR) Inner and outer Lindblad resonances (ILR and OLR)

Resonances in galactic disks For a flat rotation curve Lindblad resonances are given by Corotation is at For a 2-armed spiral structure or a bar m=2. For a 4-armed spiral m=4. Inner and Outer Lindblad resonances

Stellar orbits near resonances m=4 at Near OLR OLR Near m=2 Corotation (CR) Single spiral wave Outside OLR+CR Inside OLR+CR 2 spiral waves

Radial migration

N-body Tree-SPH Disk expands due to strong angular momentum transport outwards (Minchev et al. 2012a). Formation of a pseudobulge Simulations by P. Di Matteo

Power spectrograms reveal multiple patterns Overlap of bar and spiral creates transient stellar mass clumps! Sa model Existence of multiple patterns in disks long known in simulations: Tagger et al. (1987) Signet et al. (1988) Quillen et al. (2011) Minchev et al. (2012a) and in observations: Elemegreen et al. (1992) Rix & Rieke (1993) Meidt et al. (2009) Minchev et al. (2012a) Interaction between the bar and the spiral when reconnecting

Power spectrograms reveal multiple patterns Time Quasi-steady spiral patterns of multiplicity 1-4 Minchev et al. (2012a)

Chemo-dynamical evolution modeling of the Milky Way

Classical chemical evolution modeling Classical chemical evolution models (Matteucci & Francois 1989; Prantzos & Aubert 1995; Chiappini et al. 1997, 2001). Stars assumed to die close to their birth places. 4 kpc 2 kpc 8 kpc 14 kpc 12 kpc

Classical chemical evolution modeling hampered by radial migration Stars move away from their birth places (Sellwood and Binney 2002). 4 kpc 2 kpc 8 kpc 14 kpc 12 kpc MCM13 model

Classical chemical evolution modeling hampered by radial migration Stars move away from their birth places (Sellwood and Binney 2002). 4 kpc 2 kpc 8 kpc 14 kpc 12 kpc mean MCM13 model

Classical chemical evolution modeling hampered by radial migration Stars move away from their birth places (Sellwood and Binney 2002). 4 kpc 2 kpc We need to recover the migration efficiency as a function of Galactic radius and time. 14 kpc mean 8 kpc 12 kpc t=6.7 Gyr Stellar density MCM13 model Bar resonances

Disk formation in cosmological simulations Traditionally a challenge (e.g., Navarro and Benz 1991; Abadi et al., 2003): Extreme angular momentum loss during mergers. Overly-concentrated mass distributions and massive bulges. Abadi et al. (2003)

Recent improvements Increase in resolution and better modeling of star formation and feedback produce MW-mass galaxies with reduced bulge fractions (e.g., Agertz et al. 2011; Guedes et al. 2011; Martig et al. 2012). However, no chemical treatment! Milky Way disk morphology not easily reproducible in fully cosmological simulations. Guedes et al. (2011)

Recent improvements in chemical enrichment Simulations including chemical treatment Raiteri et al. (1996), Mosconi et al. (2001), Lia et al. (2002), Kawata and Gibson (2003), Kobayashi (2004), Scannapieco et al. (2005), Martínez-Serrano et al. (2008), Oppenheimer and Davé (2008), Wiersma et al. (2009), Few et al. (2012) Encouraging results recently global observed trends reproduced: The mass-metallicity relation (e.g., Kobayashi et al. 2007) Metallicity trends between different galactic components (e.g., Tissera et al. 2012) However, still a challenge to reproduce the properties of the Milky Way, e.g., the typical metallicities of the different components Tissera et al. (2012).

Recent improvements in chemical enrichment Simulations including chemical treatment Raiteri et al. (1996), Mosconi et al. (2001), Lia et al. (2002), Kawata and Gibson (2003), Kobayashi (2004), Scannapieco et al. (2005), Martínez-Serrano et al. (2008), Oppenheimer and Davé (2008), Wiersma et al. (2009), Disk Few et al. (2012) Aquarius simulations Spheroid Inner halo Encouraging results recently global observed trends reproduced: Outer halo The mass-metallicity relation (e.g., Kobayashi et al. 2007) Metallicity trends between different galactic components (e.g., Tissera et al. 2012) However, still a challenge to reproduce the properties of the Milky Way, e.g., the typical metallicities of the different components Tissera et al. (2012). Tissera et al. (2012)

Seek an alternative approach to circumvent problems with fully self-consistent simulations Radial migration must be considered in the disk s chemical evolution (Sellwood and Binney 2002, Schonrich and Binnery 2009a,b). Use present day Milky Way disk morphology and kinematics as constraints

Ingredients A high-resolution simulation of a disk assembly in the cosmological context: Gas infall form filaments and gas-rich mergers Merger activity decreasing toward redshift zero Disk properties at redshift zero consistent with the dynamics and morphology of the Milky Way: The presence of a Milky Way-size bar A small bulge Bar s Outer Lindblad Resonance at ~2.5 disk scale-lengths A detailed chemical evolution model: Matching several observational constraints in the Milky Way.

Galactic disk assembly in the cosmological context Simulation in cosmological context Martig et al. (2009, 2012) Stars born hot at high redshift: Similar to Brook et al. (2012), Stinson et al. (2013), Bird et al. (2013) Simulations by M. Martig

Chemical model Constrained by: The solar and present day abundances of more than 30 elements The present SFR The current stellar, gas and total mass densities at the solar vicinity The present day supernovae rates of type II and Ia The metallicity distribution of G-dwarf stars Similar to Chiappini (2009) Only thin disk chemistry used!

Origin and metallicity distributions of local stars max z <3 kpc 7<r<9 kpc Minchev, Chiappini & Martig (2013) Older populations arrive from progressively smaller galactic radii due to their longer exposure to migration.

Origin and metallicity distributions of local stars kpc kpc

Increase of disk scale-length with age: A legacy of inside-out formation Simulations with strong merger activity at high redshift Bovy et al. (2012a) Radial migration cannot compete with inside-out formation. Martig et al. (2014a)

The metallicity distribution z < 40 pc z > 500 pc Adibekyan et al. (2012) 0.1< z kpc 7.9<r<8.1 kpc SEGUE, DR9, Brauer et al. (2014) 0.5< z <3 kpc 6<r<10 kpc MCM13 Model = 0 dex Shift For both model and observations the MDF peak shifts to lower [Fe/H] with distance from the disk plane

The [Fe/H]-[O/Fe] relation Kinematical selection of thin- and thick-disk populations Ramírez et al. (2013) Thick disk Thin disk

The [Fe/H]-[O/Fe] relation Kinematical selection of thin- and thick-disk populations Ramírez et al. (2013) Thick disk Thin disk Minchev et al. 2013 Model Thick disk Thin disk

The age-[α/fe] relation Haywood et al. (2013) This model Mean model

The Rotational velocity - Metallicity relation Model Navarro et al. (2011) All Significant migration in model, yet flat relation for thin disk.

Scale-height distribution of mono-abundance subpopulations Bovy et al. (2012), SEGUE data Model data SEGUE G-dwarfs Bovy et al. (2012) kpc z <3 kpc 6<r<10 kpc Model disk Scale-heights

A new chemo-kinematic relation can recover the disk merger history

Vertical velocity dispersion as a fn of [Mg/Fe] in RAVE RAVE Giants, SN>65 7<r<9 kpc z <0.6 kpc 4755 stars Velocity dispersion drops at [Mg/Fe] > 0.4 dex Minchev + RAVE (2014)

Vertical velocity dispersion as a fn of [Mg/Fe] in RAVE Minchev + RAVE (2014) RAVE Giants, SN>65 7<r<9 kpc z <0.6 kpc 4755 stars Separate into [Fe/H] sub-populations [Fe/H] 1.0 0.8 dex 0.45 0.3 0.17 0.04 Velocity dispersion drops at the high-[mg/fe] end for each metallicity sub-population

Vertical velocity dispersion as a fn of [Mg/Fe] in RAVE Minchev + RAVE (2014) RAVE Giants, SN>65 7<r<9 kpc z <0.6 kpc 4755 stars Separate into [Fe/H] sub-populations [Fe/H] 1.0 0.8 dex 0.45 0.3 0.17 0.04 Velocity dispersion drops at the high-[mg/fe] end for each metallicity sub-population

Model 7<r<9 kpc 0.2< z <0.6 kpc Origin of stars currently in the solar neighborhood

Model 7<r<9 kpc 0.2< z <0.6 kpc Origin of stars currently in the solar neighborhood [Fe/H] 1.0 0.8 dex 0.45 0.3 0.17 0.04

Model 7<r<9 kpc 0.2< z <0.6 kpc Origin of stars currently in the solar neighborhood [Fe/H] Model 7<r<9 kpc 0.2< z <0.6 kpc 1.0 0.8 dex 0.45 0.3 0.17 0.04 For a given metallicity bin, stars coming from the inner disc are kinematically colder and older.

Cool old stars arrive from inner disk during mergers Model 7<r<9 kpc, 0.2< z <0.6 kpc Gyr Old stars coming from the inner disk are cooler than locally born stars by up to 30 km/s. rfinal Slope becomes negative for the last several Gyr (no significant mergers). Explains inversion of vel. dispersion - [Mg/Fe] relation in RAVE and SEGUE G-dwarf data.

Cool old stars arrive from inner disk during mergers Model 7<r<9 kpc, 0.2< z <0.6 kpc Gyr Model Old stars 7<r<9 coming kpc from the inner disk are 0.2< z <0.6 cooler kpcthan locally born stars by up to 30 km/s. rfinal Slope becomes negative for the last several Gyr (no significant mergers). Explains inversion of vel. dispersion - [Mg/Fe] relation in RAVE and SEGUE G-dwarf data.

Summary Great improvements in chemo-dynamics in cosmological simulations, however, still hard to apply to Milky Way. Important for disk models to match the Milky Way morphology today. Our chemo-dynamical model explains everything. Great care taken in defining properly the solar neighborhood. More than 30 elements available for doing Galactic Archeology (e.g., GALAH, APOGEE, 4MOST, Gaia). Decline in velocity dispersion found in RAVE and SEGUE at [α/fe] 0.4 dex. Can be related to perturbations from satellite-disk interactions over the Galaxy lifetime. Extragalactic Archaeology will be made possible with the E-ELT!

Summary Great improvements in chemo-dynamics in cosmological simulations, however, still hard to apply to Milky Way. Important for disk models to match the Milky Way morphology today. Our chemo-dynamical model explains everything consistent with a wide range of observational constraints. Great care taken in defining properly the solar neighborhood. More than 30 elements available for doing Galactic Archeology (e.g., GALAH, APOGEE, 4MOST, Gaia). Decline in velocity dispersion found in RAVE and SEGUE at [α/fe] 0.4 dex. Can be related to perturbations from satellite-disk interactions over the Galaxy lifetime. Extragalactic Archaeology will be made possible with the E-ELT!