CMB quadrupole depression from early fast-roll inflation:

Similar documents
arxiv: v2 [astro-ph] 3 Jun 2008

Inflation in a general reionization scenario

Astro 507 Lecture 28 April 2, 2014

Towards Multi-field Inflation with a Random Potential

Inflationary model building, reconstructing parameters and observational limits

Oddities of the Universe

New Insights in Hybrid Inflation

Fingerprints of the early universe. Hiranya Peiris University College London

Constraints on the Inflation Model

Second Order CMB Perturbations

Inflation and the origin of structure in the Universe

Inflation. By The amazing sleeping man, Dan the Man and the Alices

PAPER 71 COSMOLOGY. Attempt THREE questions There are seven questions in total The questions carry equal weight

Analyzing WMAP Observation by Quantum Gravity

Cosmological Constraints on Dark Energy via Bulk Viscosity from Decaying Dark Matter

The Theory of Inflationary Perturbations

Scalar fields and vacuum fluctuations II

Cosmology with CMB & LSS:

MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III PAPER 53 COSMOLOGY

Higgs field as the main character in the early Universe. Dmitry Gorbunov

Week 6: Inflation and the Cosmic Microwave Background

Microwave Background Polarization: Theoretical Perspectives

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Cosmological Constraints on Newton s Gravitational Constant for Matter and Dark Matter

School Observational Cosmology Angra Terceira Açores 3 rd June Juan García-Bellido Física Teórica UAM Madrid, Spain

Review of Small Field Models of Inflation

PAPER 310 COSMOLOGY. Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight.

The AfterMap Wayne Hu EFI, February 2003

Priming the BICEP. Wayne Hu Chicago, March BB

Classical Dynamics of Inflation

El Universo en Expansion. Juan García-Bellido Inst. Física Teórica UAM Benasque, 12 Julio 2004

The Early Universe John Peacock ESA Cosmic Vision Paris, Sept 2004

arxiv:astro-ph/ v5 16 Jun 2006

Connecting Quarks to the Cosmos

Cosmology and particle physics

From inflation to the CMB to today s universe. I - How it all begins

Introduction to CosmoMC

CMB studies with Planck

A brief Introduction to CAMB and CosmoMC

Exact Inflationary Solution. Sergio del Campo

Cosmology & CMB. Set6: Polarisation & Secondary Anisotropies. Davide Maino

Modern Cosmology Final Examination Solutions 60 Pts

Zhong-Zhi Xianyu (CMSA Harvard) Tsinghua June 30, 2016

INFLATION. - EARLY EXPONENTIAL PHASE OF GROWTH OF SCALE FACTOR (after T ~ TGUT ~ GeV)

Gravitation et Cosmologie: le Modèle Standard Cours 8: 6 fevrier 2009

Cosmology after Planck

Gravitational waves from the early Universe

Inflation with a stringy minimal length (reworked)

MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS PAPER 67 COSMOLOGY

Effects of Entanglement during Inflation on Cosmological Observables

Inflationary Massive Gravity

The Principal Components of. Falsifying Cosmological Paradigms. Wayne Hu FRS, Chicago May 2011

Introduction to Inflation

Signatures of Trans-Planckian Dissipation in Inflationary Spectra

Secondary Polarization

XIII. The Very Early Universe and Inflation. ASTR378 Cosmology : XIII. The Very Early Universe and Inflation 171

GRAVITATIONAL WAVES AND THE END OF INFLATION. Richard Easther (Yale)

Primordial Non-Gaussianity

From Inflation to TeV physics: Higgs Reheating in RG Improved Cosmology

Rethinking Time at the Big Bang

Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization. Gil Holder

Leptogenesis via the Relaxation of Higgs and other Scalar Fields

Inflationary Trajectories

Inflationary Cosmology and Alternatives

Asymptotically safe inflation from quadratic gravity

Rayleigh scattering:

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

The Nature of Dark Energy and its Implications for Particle Physics and Cosmology

Unication models of dark matter and dark energy

Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology. Week 8

The cosmic background radiation II: The WMAP results. Alexander Schmah

The Once and Future CMB

Hemispherical CMB power asymmetry: observation vs. models

Open Inflation in the String Landscape

Non-Gaussianity in the CMB. Kendrick Smith (Princeton) Whistler, April 2012

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

Evolution of Scalar Fields in the Early Universe

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

Avoiding strong coupling problem in the Higgs inflation with R 2 -term. Dmitry Gorbunov

primordial avec les perturbations cosmologiques *


Features in Inflation and Generalized Slow Roll

Cosmology and the origin of structure

POST-INFLATIONARY HIGGS RELAXATION AND THE ORIGIN OF MATTER- ANTIMATTER ASYMMETRY

The New Relationship between Inflation & Gravitational Waves

Inflation, Gravity Waves, and Dark Matter. Qaisar Shafi

Structures in the early Universe. Particle Astrophysics chapter 8 Lecture 4

Cosmology from Brane Backreaction

Observational Cosmology

An Estimator for statistical anisotropy from the CMB. CMB bispectrum

Astro 321 Set 4: Inflationary Perturbations. Wayne Hu

Principal Components. and Paradigm Falsification

Cosmic Inflation Tutorial

Computational Physics and Astrophysics

The Galaxy Dark Matter Connection

Constraints on Inflationary Correlators From Conformal Invariance. Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai.

Higgs Inflation Mikhail Shaposhnikov SEWM, Montreal, 29 June - 2 July 2010

Anisotropy in the CMB

Data Analysis I. Dr Martin Hendry, Dept of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow, UK. 10 lectures, beginning October 2006

Theoretical implications of detecting gravitational waves

Transcription:

CMB quadrupole depression from early fast-roll inflation: MCMC analysis of current experimental data Claudio Destri claudio.destri@mib.infn.it Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini Università Milano Bicocca Physics of the Universe: Implications of the Recent Observations, Universidad Complutense Madrid May 2008

Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Central objects: the CMB TT, TE, EE, (BB) correlation multipoles C l The framework Observational data = C (data) l with much systematics and complex likelihood code; Theoretical cosmological model = C (model) l fully independent and chi-square distributed if primordial fluctuations are gaussian; Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis to assign likelihood to model parameters (see later)

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Neglecting all uncertainities but cosmic variance: Let x = 1/y = C (data) l /C (model) l ; then p l (x model) 1 x (xe x ) l+1/2 (chi-square distribution) sets the probability density for C (data) l x = 1 and (x) ML = 2l 1 2l + 1 ; p l (y data) ( e 1/y /y ) l+1/2 given the model, with sets the probability density for C (model l given the data (assuming flat priors), with y = 2l + 1 2l 3 and (y) ML = 1.

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value An example: lowest 9 multipoles probability curves from best fit ΛCDM WMAP5 data Prob[C (data) l < 0.184 C (model) l ] = 0.031...

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 1σ uncertainities based on p l (y data) from M. R. Nolta et al., arxiv:0803.0593 [astro-ph] 5 Mar 2008

Unbiased(?) estimation Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value Probability that at least one multipole, regardless of l, is smaller than x times its theoretical expectation value: [ l max ] x P( x,l max ) = 1 1 dx p(x model) If model=λcdm, then l=2 0 0.05 0.045 0.0487 P(0.184,l max ) = 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.0312 2 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21

EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) EFT of (single field) inflation (à la Boyanowski de Vega Sanchez) Standard units: ħ = 1, c = 1, M PL = 2.4 10 18 GeV Inflaton potential V(φ) = N M 4 w(χ), χ = φ N MPL, w(χ) O(1), N 50 Energy scale of inflation and inflaton mass M 0.57 10 16 GeV M GUT, m = M 2 /M PL 1.3 10 13 GeV Number of efolds kept fixed in MCMC analysis N = log a(t end) a(t exit ), w(χ end) = w (χ end ) = 0 t exit : the mode with comoving k 0 becomes superhorizon Understanding start and end of inflation N

Dimensionless setup Prologue EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Stretched time and dimensionless Hubble parameter τ = t M2 M PL N, H = H M Pl = O(1) N M 2 Equations of motion [ H 2 (τ) = 1 1 3 2 N χ2 + w(χ) ] 1, N χ + 3 H χ + w (χ) = 0 Energy density and pressure ρ N M 4 = 1 2 N χ2 + w(χ), p N M 4 = 1 2 N χ2 w(χ) From fast-roll to slow-roll 1 2 N χ2 w(χ), 1 2 N χ2 w(χ)

EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Scalar fluctuations Prologue EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Gauge invariant quantum perturbation field u(x, t) = ξ(t) R(x, t) = [ ] d 3 k α (2π) 3/2 k S k (η)e ik x + α k S k (η)e ik x ] [α k, α k = δ (3) (k k ), ξ(t) = a(t) φ(t) H(t), η = dt a(t) Schroedinger like dynamics [ ] d 2 k 2 + U(η) S dη 2 k (η) = 0, U(η) = 1 ξ d 2 ξ dη 2 Standard parametrization in dimensionless setup U(η) = a 2 H 2 m 2 N [2 7 ǫ v + 2ǫ 2v 8ǫ v w N ǫ v = 1 2N ( ) 2 1 dχ H 2 dτ, ηv = 1 N ] η H 2 v (3 ǫ v ) w (χ) w(χ)

EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Slow roll approximation ǫ v = 1 2N [ w (χ exit ) w(χ exit ) ] 2 + O ( 1 N 2 ), ηv = 1 N w (χ exit ) w(χ exit ) + O ( 1 N 2 ) Fast roll correction U(η) = ν2 1 4 η 2, ν = 3 2 + 3 ǫ v η v U(η) = ν2 1 4 η 2 + V(η) for Binomial New Inflation, w(χ) = y 32 ( χ 2 8 y ) 2 and y = 1.32

Fast roll = special initial conditions for slow roll EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Solution when V(η) = 0 S k (η) = A(k)g ν (k; η) + B(k)g ν(k; η), g ν (k; η) = 1 2 iν+ 1 2 Scattering amplitudes (or Bogoliubov coefficients) Primordial power spectrum A(k) = 1 + i 0 dη g ν(k; η) V(η) S k (η) B(k) = i 0 dη g ν(k; η) V(η) S k (η) P(k) = lim η 0 k 3 2π 2 Fast-roll transfer function S k (η) ξ(η) 2 [ ] = P sr (k) 1 + D(k) D(k) = 2 B(k) 2 2Re [ A(k)B (k) i 2ν 3] πη H (1) ν ( k η)

EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

The transfer function D(k) for BNI EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) Born s approximation [ ( ) ] D(k) = 1 0 k dη V(η) sin(2 kη) 1 1 + 2 k 2 η 2 kη cos(2kη) For Binomial New Inflation: Scaling properties and the crossover wavenumber k 1 ( ) V(η) = k1 2 Q(k k 1 η), D(k) = F k 1

Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

The setup Prologue Observational data = likelihood on C (model) l ; Model with cosmological parameters λ = {λ 1,λ 2,...λ n } = C (model) l (λ) (CMBFAST, CAMB,...); = likelihood L(λ) The MCMC method produces sequences distributed as L(λ) ( the prior probability), through an acceptance/rejection one-step algorithm (e.g. Metropolis) W(λ (k+1),λ (k) ) = g(λ (k+1),λ (k) ) min { 1, L(λ(k+1) ) g(λ (k+1),λ (k) ) L(λ (k) ) g(λ (k),λ (k+1) ) }

CosmoMC Antony Lewis, Sarah Bridle - http://cosmologist.info/cosmomc/ Publicly available F90 open source code Comes with CMB and LSS data (except WMAP) Interfaces directly with the WMAP1-3-5 likelihood software Theoretical calculations with CAMB (derived from CMBFAST) Quite accurate, easy to use, fairly well documented Comes with tool for analyzing results and useful MATLAB scripts Not very fast, but runs well on clusters poorly modular, too many globals

The ΛCDM+r model Prologue MCMC parameters: Context: Datasets: param best fit 100Ω b h 2 2.284 Ω c h 2 0.11 θ 1.043 100τ 8.87 H 0 72.5 σ 8 0.809 log[10 10 A s ] 0.308 n s 0.971 r 0.008 log(l) 1254.43 ω b, ω c, θ, τ, (slow), A s, n s, r (fast) Ω ν = 0,... ; standard priors, no SZ, no lensing, linear mpk,... WMAP5, ACBAR08, SDSS 0.022 0.024 Ω b h 2 0.1 0.11 0.12 Ω c h 2 1.04 1.05 θ 0.7 0.75 0.8 Ω Λ 13.5 14 Age/GYr 0.05 0.1 0.15 τ 0.75 0.8 0.85 σ 8 10 15 z re 70 75 80 3 3.1 3.2 H 0 log(10 10 0.940.960.98 1 1.021.040 0.2 A ) n s s r

The n s r plane and Binomial New Inflation n s = 1 y N 3 z+1, r = 16 y z (1 z) 2 N, y = z 1 log z, 0 < z < 1 (1 z) 2

The n s r plane and Binomial New Inflation n s = 1 y N 3 z+1, r = 16 y z (1 z) 2 N, y = z 1 log z, 0 < z < 1 (1 z) 2 0.3 0.25 0.2 WMAP3,SDSS ACBAR06,... N = 50 N = 60 r 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 n s

The n s r plane and Binomial New Inflation n s = 1 y N 3 z+1, r = 16 y z (1 z) 2 N, y = z 1 log z, 0 < z < 1 (1 z) 2 0.3 0.25 0.2 WMAP5,SDSS, ACBAR08 N = 50 N = 60 r 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 n s

The ΛCDM_BNI(z) model Prologue MCMC parameters: Context: Datasets: param best fit 100Ω b h 2 2.261 Ω c h 2 0.11 θ 1.041 100τ 8.77 H 0 72.0 σ 8 0.804 log[10 10 A s ] 0.307 n s 0.968 r 0.102 log(l) 1254.47 ω b, ω c, θ, τ, (slow), A s, z (fast) N = 60, Ω ν = 0,... ; standard priors, no SZ, no lensing, linear mpk,... WMAP5, ACBAR08, SDSS 0.022 0.023 Ω b h 2 0.1 0.11 0.12 Ω c h 2 1.035 1.04 1.045 θ 0.7 0.74 0.78 Ω Λ 13.6 13.8 Age/GYr 70 75 H 0 3 3.05 3.1 3.15 log(10 10 A s ) 0.02 0.06 0.1 τ 0.75 0.8 0.85 σ 8 10 15 z re 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 z

Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

BNI+sharpcut vs. BNI+fastroll Prologue MCMC parameters: Datasets: param best fit 100Ω b h 2 2.243 Ω c h 2 0.11 θ 1.04 100τ 7.99 H 0 71.5 σ 8 0.799 log[10 10 A s ] 0.306 n s 0.964 r 0.055 k 1 0.278 log(l) 1254.10 ω b, ω c, θ, τ, (slow), A s, z, k 1 (fast) WMAP5, ACBAR08, SDSS 0.022 0.0235 Ω b h 2 0.1 0.11 0.12 Ω c h 2 1.035 1.04 1.045 θ 0.72 0.76 Ω Λ 13.5 13.8 Age/GYr 70 75 H 0 3 3.15 log(10 10 A s ) sharp cut 0.05 0.1 τ 0.75 0.8 0.85 σ 8 10 15 z re 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 z 0 0.2 0.4 1000*k 1

BNI+sharpcut vs. BNI+fastroll Prologue MCMC parameters: Datasets: param best fit 100Ω b h 2 2.243 Ω c h 2 0.11 θ 1.04 100τ 8.19 H 0 71.5 σ 8 0.797 log[10 10 A s ] 0.306 n s 0.965 r 0.062 k 1 0.302 log(l) 1254.02 ω b, ω c, θ, τ, (slow), A s, z, k 1 (fast) WMAP5, ACBAR08, SDSS 0.022 0.0235 Ω b h 2 0.1 0.11 0.12 Ω c h 2 1.035 1.04 1.045 θ 0.72 0.76 Ω Λ 13.5 13.8 Age/GYr 70 75 H 0 3 3.15 log(10 10 A s ) fast roll 0.05 0.1 τ 0.75 0.8 0.85 σ 8 6 8 10 12 14 z re 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 z 0 0.2 0.4 1000*k 1

Comparing TT multipoles Prologue 7000 6000 5000 WMAP5 data ΛCDM+r BNI+sharpcut BNI+fastroll l(l+1)c l /2π 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1 2 3 4 5 log(multipole index)

Comparing TE multipoles Prologue 30 20 10 WMAP5 data ΛCDM+r BNI+sharpcut BNI+fastroll l(l+1)c l /2π 0 10 20 30 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 log(multipole index)

Prologue Comparing real-space TT correlations 700 600 WMAP data ΛCDM+r BNI+sharpcut BNI+fastroll 500 400 C(θ) 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 0 0.5 1 C. Destri, H. J. de Vega, N. Sanchez (arxiv:0804.2387) 1.5 θ 2 2.5 3 CMB Quadrupole..., Madrid 2008

Highlights of BNI+fastroll Prologue The probability distribution for r: 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 BNI r > 0.023 (95% CL) 0.05 0.1 0.15 r 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 BNI+fastroll r > 0.018 (95% CL) 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 r MCMC analysis = k 1 is the crossover wavenumber: its wavelength scale exits the horizon when fast-roll ends and slow-roll starts

Outline 1 Prologue Observational data and models On cosmic variance On the CMB quadrupole (small) value 2 EFT of inflation Early fast-roll and primordial fluctuations The transfer function D(k) 3

Relevant wavelength scales (using WMAP3 + small scale exps. + SDSS) The quadrupole wavenumber today k Q η 0 = 2, η 0 = 3.3 H 0, k Q = 0.145 (Gpc) 1, log(a Q ) = 0.425 The fast/slow crossover wavenumber: ǫ v = 1/N k 1 = 0.266 (Gpc) 1, log(a 1 ) = 1.107, log(a crossover ) = 1.091 The pivot scale (WMAP) k 0 = 2 (Gpc) 1, log(a 0 ) = 3.135 The pivot scale (CosmoMC default) k 0 = 50 (Gpc) 1, log(a 0 ) = 6.363

Computing the total number of e-folds (using best fit with WMAP3, y=1.32) The quadrupole wavenumber at the beginning of inflation k Q = 0.545 k 1 = 7.63 m 1.02 10 14 GeV = 1.6 10 55 (Gpc) 1 The total expansion since beginning of inflation 1 + z b = 1.10 10 56 e 129 = e Ntot /a r The Hubble parameter just after reheating, H r a r 10 31 M PL /H r, H r = e 2[56 N] 10 14 GeV The bounds on N H r 10 14 GeV, H r > 1 MeV (BBN) = 56 < N < 76

Most likely the quadrupole depression has a nontrivial cosmological origin Early fast-roll inflation is generic and provides a quadrupole depression BNI fits well the CMB+LSS data and provides lower bounds for r BNI+fastroll improves the fit w.r.t. ΛCDM+r and also w.r.t. BNI+sharpcut Fast-roll provides good bounds on N Outlook Improve the theory (expecially concerning reheating) Wait for better data (Plank and new gound exps.) Refine, refine, refine