Low-loss superconducting resonant circuits using vacuum-gap-based microwave components

Similar documents
HIGH-QUALITY-FACTOR superconducting resonators

Josephson phase qubit circuit for the evaluation of advanced tunnel barrier materials *

Coplanar waveguide resonators for circuit quantum electrodynamics

State tomography of capacitively shunted phase qubits with high fidelity. Abstract

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 5 May 2015

Wirebond crosstalk and cavity modes in large chip mounts for superconducting qubits

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 17 Jul 2015

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Mark David Jenkins Martes cúantico, February 25th, 2014

Dielectric losses in multi-layer Josephson junction qubits

Tunable Resonators for Quantum Circuits

Superconducting Qubits Lecture 4

Distributing Quantum Information with Microwave Resonators in Circuit QED

Exploring parasitic Material Defects with superconducting Qubits

Quantum Computing and the Technical Vitality of Materials Physics

Doing Atomic Physics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics with Superconducting Circuits

R. McDermott Publications

Metastable states in an RF driven Josephson oscillator

Controlling the Interaction of Light and Matter...

Dynamical Casimir effect in superconducting circuits

Supercondcting Qubits

Superconducting Resonators and Their Applications in Quantum Engineering

Superconducting quantum circuit research -building blocks for quantum matter- status update from the Karlsruhe lab

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara. Testing Quantum Mechanics in a Mechanical System: Characterizing Mechanical Resonators

Introduction to Circuit QED

Evaluation of kinetic-inductance nonlinearity in a singlecrystal NbTiN-based coplanar waveguide

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Synthesizing arbitrary photon states in a superconducting resonator

Superconducting phase qubits

Entangled Macroscopic Quantum States in Two Superconducting Qubits

GHZ ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF CARBON NANOTUBES ON SILICON DIOXIDE MICRO BRIDGES

Coherent Coupling between 4300 Superconducting Flux Qubits and a Microwave Resonator

Process Tomography of Quantum Memory in a Josephson Phase Qubit coupled to a Two-Level State

Florent Lecocq. Control and measurement of an optomechanical system using a superconducting qubit. Funding NIST NSA/LPS DARPA.

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Circuit QED

A Novel Tunable Dual-Band Bandstop Filter (DBBSF) Using BST Capacitors and Tuning Diode

Quantum optics and quantum information processing with superconducting circuits

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 29 Dec 2013

arxiv: v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 19 Oct 2010

Towards a quantum interface between light and microwave circuits

Superconducting Qubits

2015 AMO Summer School. Quantum Optics with Propagating Microwaves in Superconducting Circuits I. Io-Chun, Hoi

Quantum Optics with Electrical Circuits: Strong Coupling Cavity QED

Resistance Thermometry based Picowatt-Resolution Heat-Flow Calorimeter

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara. A Macroscopic Mechanical Resonator Operated in the Quantum Limit

Objective: Competitive Low-Cost Thin-Film Varactor Technology. Integrated Monolithic Capacitors using Sputtered/MOCVD material on low-cost substrates

Robert McDermott. Department of Physics Tel: (608) University of Wisconsin-Madison Fax: (608)

Retract. Press down D RG MG LG S. Recess. I-V Converter VNA. Gate ADC. DC Bias. 20 mk. Amplifier. Attenuators. 0.

From SQUID to Qubit Flux 1/f Noise: The Saga Continues

Entanglement Control of Superconducting Qubit Single Photon System

USA 2) Department of Materials, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA 3) Google Inc., Santa Barbara, California 93117, USA

Superconducting Flux Qubits: The state of the field

A Broadband Flexible Metamaterial Absorber Based on Double Resonance

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 13 Nov 2017

Microstrip Coupler with Complementary Split-Ring Resonator (CSRR)

Quantum computation and quantum optics with circuit QED

Analytical Optimization of High Performance and High Quality Factor MEMS Spiral Inductor

Low Temperature Thermal Transport in Partially Perforated Silicon Nitride. Membranes

Materials Origins of Decoherence in Superconducting Qubits Robert McDermott

Lecture 2, March 1, 2018

Self-study problems and questions Processing and Device Technology, FFF110/FYSD13

Prospects for Superconducting Qubits. David DiVincenzo Varenna Course CLXXXIII

Supplementary Figure 1: SAW transducer equivalent circuit

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics (QED): Coupling a Harmonic Oscillator to a Qubit

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Superconducting qubits (Phase qubit) Quantum informatics (FKA 172)

Nonlinear kinetic inductance in TiN/NbTiN microresonators and Transmission lines. Peter Day Byeong-Ho Eom Rick Leduc Jonas Zmuidzinas

INTRODUCTION TO SUPERCONDUCTING QUBITS AND QUANTUM EXPERIENCE: A 5-QUBIT QUANTUM PROCESSOR IN THE CLOUD

4-3 New Regime of Circuit Quantum Electro Dynamics

Supplementary Information for Controlled catch and release of microwave photon states

Quantum optics and optomechanics

High-frequency measurements of spin-valve films and devices invited

This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

An architecture for integrating planar and 3D cqed devices

Design and fabrication of multi-dimensional RF MEMS variable capacitors

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Condensed Matter Without Matter Quantum Simulation with Photons

Hybrid Quantum Circuit with a Superconducting Qubit coupled to a Spin Ensemble

On-Wafer Characterization of Electromagnetic Properties of Thin-Film RF Materials

Expressions for f r (T ) and Q i (T ) from Mattis-Bardeen theory

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 16 Oct 2015

Superconductivity Induced Transparency

Dipole-coupling a single-electron double quantum dot to a microwave resonator

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Supplementary Note 1: Fabrication of Scanning Thermal Microscopy Probes

GROWTH OF TITANIUM-NITRIDE THIN FILMS FOR LOW-LOSS SUPERCONDUCTING QUANTUM CIRCUITS GUSTAF ANDERS OLSON DISSERTATION

Design and Characterisation of Titanium Nitride Subarrays of Kinetic Inductance Detectors for Passive Terahertz Imaging

Landau Zener Stückelberg interference in a multi-anticrossing system

Instrumentation for sub-mm astronomy. Adam Woodcraft SUPA, University of Edinburgh

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 31 May 2010

Circuit QED with electrons on helium:

Measuring the decoherence of a quantronium qubit with the cavity bifurcation amplifier

arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 11 Sep 2015

Charge fluctuators, their temperature and their response to sudden electrical fields

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 14 Jul 2009

Demonstration of Near-Infrared Negative-Index Materials

DEPOSITION OF THIN TiO 2 FILMS BY DC MAGNETRON SPUTTERING METHOD

Lecture 2, March 2, 2017

This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

Photon shot noise dephasing in the strong-dispersive limit of circuit QED

Transcription:

Low-loss superconducting resonant circuits using vacuum-gap-based microwave components Katarina Cicak 1, Dale Li 1, Joshua A. Strong 1,2, Michael S. Allman 1,2, Fabio Altomare 1, Adam J. Sirois 1,2, Jed D. Whittaker 1,2, John D. Teufel 1, and Raymond W. Simmonds 1 1 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA 2 University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA We have produced high-quality complex microwave circuits, such as multiplexed resonators and superconducting phase qubits, using a vacuum-gap technology that eliminates lossy dielectric materials. We have improved our design and fabrication strategy beyond our earlier work, leading to increased yield, enabling the realization of these complex circuits. We incorporate both novel vacuum-gap wiring crossovers (VGX) for gradiometric inductors and vacuum-gap capacitors (VGC) on chip to produce resonant circuits that have large internal quality factors (30,000<Q I <165,000) at 50 mk, outperforming most dielectric-filled devices. Resonators with VGCs as large as 180 pf confirm single mode behavior of our lumped-element components. 1

Low-loss microwave circuit components are crucial for emerging superconducting quantum-based technologies. Resonators built from passive circuits are key for microwave nano-mechanics experiments 1, kinetic inductance 2 and transition edge 3 photon detector arrays, quantum-limited microwave amplifiers 4,5, superconducting quantum bits (qubits) 6, and quantum memories 7. Researchers developing quantumlimited detectors and amplifiers, as well as qubits, are concerned about intrinsic noise sources and decoherence. Both are thought to be associated with unwanted two-level system (TLS) defects found in amorphous dielectric materials. 8-10 The TLSs are believed to be microscopic in origin resulting from structural imperfections. 8 They disrupt the operation of quantum circuits via electric (and possibly magnetic) dipole coupling to electromagnetic fields. For superconducting phase qubits, this has led to short energy relaxation times 10, reduced measurement fidelity 11, and unwanted qubit interactions 12. Measurements involving lumped-element LC resonators using dielectric-filled parallel-plate capacitors have confirmed that TLSs absorb energy at low temperatures and low voltages. 10,13 Furthermore, TLSs within amorphous native oxides found on the surfaces of coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonators have also contributed to noise in superconducting kinetic inductance detectors. 9 Removing the TLS defects is a major challenge for advancing the performance of most superconducting circuits operating at low temperature in the quantum regime. Motivated by the need for lossless cryogenic microwave components on chip, various strategies have been pursued to eliminate TLS defects. One strategy is to search for amorphous materials with a more highly constrained lattice with fewer TLSs. Simply increasing the silicon content in silicon-nitride dielectrics improves performance. 14 A survey of different materials 13 shows that achieving low-voltage, low-temperature dielectric loss tangents near 10-5 is possible with amorphous hydrogenated silicon. Another effective strategy is to use planarized components that rely on vacuum and a crystalline substrate dielectric. When fabricated on sapphire or undoped silicon, interdigitated capacitors (IDCs) and CPWs show good performance. 13,15 However, these distributed structures have large footprints, often spanning millimeters, and can suffer from non-ideal characteristics such as parasitic inductances and additional resonant modes. In this work, we developed methods for fabricating lumped-element circuit components that confine electromagnetic fields mostly to vacuum, eliminating lossy amorphous dielectrics. We microfabricated superconducting parallel-plate capacitors with a small vacuum gap (VGC) providing a relatively small on-chip footprint with nearly ideal capacitor behavior. We combined VGCs with microfabricated superconducting gradiometric inductors with vacuum-gap wiring crossovers (VGX) to form lumpedelement resonators. Resonant transmission measurements were used to characterize microwave losses and to demonstrate frequency-domain multiplexing with multiple resonators attached to a single CPW feedline. In addition, we successfully fabricated and operated phase qubits incorporating VGCs and VGXs. 2

FIG. 1. (Color online) Fabrication procedure for VGCs. (a) Lower VGC plate patterned from an Al layer 100 nm thick on a sapphire wafer. (b) Patterned sacrificial layer (Nb, Si, or SiNx) 200 nm thick with via holes. (c) Al top capacitor plate 100 nm thick is sputtered and patterned on top of the sacrificial layer. Al fills the via holes in the sacrificial layer, forming posts that support the top plate. The lower plate is connected to the ground plane. (d) The sacrificial layer is removed by an isotropic high-pressure SF 6 plasma etch through the holes in the top plate. Microfabrication of the VGC (shown in Fig. 1) and VGX structures is achieved with standard optical lithography and wet and dry thin-film etching techniques. A polycrystalline Al film, 100 nm thick, is sputtered on a sapphire wafer, and patterned by wet etching to form the lower capacitor plate perforated with a hexagonal hole pattern. Next, a 200 nm sacrificial layer is sputter- (Nb or Si) or plasma- (SiN x ) deposited and then patterned with via holes (2 μm diameter) aligned over the holes in the lower plate. A second layer of Al 100 nm thick is sputtered and patterned to form the top capacitor plate and the ground plane. An overlap contact connects the ground plane to the lower capacitor plate. Aluminum fills in the via holes, forming posts that support the top plate after the sacrificial layer is removed in a later step. An array of small holes (1 μm in diameter and offset from the via-posts) in the top plate facilitates the removal of the sacrificial layer after the wafer has been diced into 6.5 6.5 mm 2 chips. The sacrificial 3

layer is removed with an isotropic high-pressure SF 6 plasma etch, leaving a gap between the plates. This fabrication process lithographically defines the via-type Al posts (unlike the previously developed VGCs 16 ) eliminating the possibility of under- or over-etching the posts. We have achieved a significantly higher yield of non-shorted and non-collapsed capacitors, allowing us to build more complex circuits. VGXs are fabricated during the same sequence; sacrificial material sandwiched between crossing wires is removed, suspending the top wire. Away from the crossover, overlap contacts connect the top wire to the bottom wiring. Figure 2(a) shows an SEM image of a fabricated LC resonator containing a VGC (Fig. 2(b)) in parallel with an inductor with VGXs (Fig. 2(c)). We have also successfully integrated VGCs and VGXs fabrication with phase-qubit fabrication (see Fig. 2(d)). FIG. 2. (Color online) (a) SEM micrograph of a fabricated LC resonator incorporating a VGC and a gradiometric multicoil inductor with VGXs. The resonator is coupled to a CPW transmission line through an IDC and surrounded by a perforated ground plane. (b) Magnified part of the VGC where the gap between the top and bottom plates is visible. (c) Magnified part of the inductor showing VGXs. (d) Square VGC with Nb posts (previously developed) in parallel with a 6 μm 2 Al-AlO x -Al Josephson junction as a part of a phase qubit. Fabricated LC resonators coupled to a CPW transmission line with characteristic impedance Z 0 = 50 Ω through one or two small IDC coupling capacitors C C <<C (see Fig. 3(a,b)) are evaluated by microwave transmission measurements to obtain the quality factor of the resonator and to extract the intrinsic loss of the circuit components. The single-c C configuration allows us to frequency-division multiplex multiple resonators with different resonant frequencies. We used this configuration to characterize multiple sets of five resonators, with various values of L, C, and C C, on a single chip with one 4

microwave feedline per set, as shown in Fig. 3(c, d). All chips are wire-bonded to a shielded circuit board and cooled in vacuum to 50 mk. All resonators are driven by a synthesized signal generator through the input port 1. The transmitted power from the output port 2 is amplified at cryogenic temperatures (4 K) and then at room temperature before being measured with a spectrum analyzer (see Fig. 3(a, b)). FIG. 3. (Color online) Measurement set-up to test LC resonators with (a) one or (b) two C C. Microwave drive is attenuated by 20 db at 4K and then by 20 db at 50 mk before the input port 1 (not shown), which ensures a thermal population of much less than one photon in the resonator. (c) SEM micrograph of a fabricated circuit with five different LC resonators each connected through a C C to a single CPW transmission line. (d) Transmitted signal of a similar circuit with equal C design values, and L values staggered to produce a frequency separation between the resonance dips of ~100 MHz. The impedance of a parallel LC resonator approaches infinity on resonance, and in the double-c C configuration the transmission spectrum exhibits a Lorentzian peak centered at frequency f = f R (2π) -1 (LC) -1/2. The energy lost within the resonator can be modeled by an effective resistance R in parallel with L and C. In circuits with dielectricfilled parallel-plate capacitors, R is dominated by the loss in the capacitive component (see Fig. 4(c)). The loss tangent, tan(δ), is related to the internal quality factor Q I of the resonator through tan(δ) = 1/Q I = (2πf R RC) -1 (L/C) 1/2 /R. Q I is related to the measured 5

quality factor Q M and to Q C, describing energy lost to the external feedlines, through Q M -1 = Q I -1 + Q C -1 with Q M = f R /δf, where δf is the full width at half maximum of the resonant peak. For C C <<C, Q C (C/C C )/(4πf R Z 0 C C ). A similar analysis of the single-c C circuit configuration, exhibiting a dip in the transmission spectrum, yields Q C (C/C C )/(πf R Z 0 C C ). FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) Transmitted signal of an LC resonator with a large VGC (1 mm across and C = 180 pf). The data show a single resonance peak at f R 500 MHz and no higher-order resonant modes. The inset shows typical data (blue line) with a fitted Lorentzian peak (red line) for a double-c C circuit containing a VGC and VGXs. (b) Capacitance vs. VGC plate overlap area. (c) Measured tan(δ) vs. <V 2 > 1/2 for three capacitors with dielectric materials (SiO 2, Si, or SiN x ) between the plates, a VGC with Al posts, and an IDC capacitor, all measured with double-c C circuits. (d) Spectroscopy of the phase qubit incorporating a VGC. The inset shows energy relaxation from the qubit excited state with characteristic time T 1 170 ns. We have measured more than sixty resonant circuits with greater than 90 % yield. These structurally robust devices have survived multiple thermal cycles from room temperature to below 100 mk. They show single-mode resonances even for resonators constructed with large capacitors, 1 mm across and 180 pf (see Fig. 4(a)). Capacitance values C extracted from measured f R scale linearly with the total plate overlap area A, as expected (see Fig. 4(b)). However, we observe that the measured values of C are 6

systematically larger than the design values C g = ε 0 A/d, where ε 0 is the permittivity of free space and d is the expected plate separation. Typically, C/C g ~ 4. We believe that film stress during fabrication and thermal contractions during cooldown reduce d. 16 On a single chip, the spread in C/C g for eleven capacitors was less then 2 %, with a larger variation from chip to chip. Five nominally identical multiplexed resonators showed resonant frequencies near 4.5 GHz scattered over a bandwidth of less then 100 MHz. Thus with our high-q resonators and well defined L and C values, it is possible to narrowly space many resonances for multiplexing applications. Loss tangent, tan(δ), was extracted from the transmitted power spectra as a function of input power or the RMS voltage across the LC resonator, <V 2 > 1/2. Fig. 4(c) shows data from five resonators fabricated on sapphire substrates: three with common dielectric materials within parallel-plate capacitors, one with an IDC, and one with VGC and VGXs. The observed tan(δ) increases at low powers, consistent with energy loss from TLSs. 10,13 Removing dielectric materials clearly improves device performance. IDC and VGC resonators show consistently weaker power dependence and lower overall tan(δ) at the lowest powers (in the single-photon limit). In this range the VGC resonators had tan(δ) ~ 3 10-5, within a factor of 1.5 of the IDC device but with a footprint roughly ten times smaller on chip. Understanding what currently limits VGC resonator performance is still under investigation. We believe that amorphous native oxides on the inner surfaces of the VGC plates are a major contributor. 9 The parallel plate geometry of VGCs provides a good platform for further research, because the electric fields can be modeled easily. Fig. 4(d) shows a phase qubit spectrum for the device shown in Fig. 2(d) with an energy relaxation time of ~170 ns. The energy relaxation time of VGC-based qubits without the sacrificial layer removed is an order of magnitude worse. The dominating residual energy losses are associated with the Josephson junction 17, not the capacitor. Using a vacuum-gap technology, we have produced high quality superconducting microwave resonators from novel lumped-element capacitive and inductive components. With small on-chip footprints and low losses these components make an attractive alternative to existing multiplexed resonators. They are well suited for many quantum-limited circuit applications including amplifiers, photon detectors, and qubits. We presented preliminary measurements for frequency-domain multiplexing of the LC resonators and for the first time demonstrated the operation of phase qubits fabricated with VGCs and VGXs, the basic building blocks for the applications mentioned above. All devices show improved microwave characteristics at low temperatures, due to removal of dielectric materials. The parallel-plate construction of VGCs can provide a useful platform for future studies of loss mechanisms in microwave circuits. This work was supported by NIST. Contribution of US government; not subject to copyright. 7

1 C. A. Regal, J. D. Teufel, and K. W. Lehnert, Nature Phys. 4, 555 (2008). 2 P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, B. A. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, and J. Zmuidzinas, Nature 425, 817 (2003). 3 J. A. B. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. D. Irwin, L. R. Vale, and K. W. Lehnert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 023514 (2008). 4 L. Spietz, K. Irwin, and J. Aumentado, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 082506 (2008). 5 M. Castellanos-Beltran and K. Lehnert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 083509 (2007). 6 A. Wallraff, D. I. Schuster, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R. S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 431, 162 (2004). 7 M. A. Sillanpää, J. I. Park, and R. W. Simmonds, Nature 449, 438 (2007). 8 W. A. Phillips, Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 1657 (1987). 9 J. Gao, M. Daal, P. K. Day, B. A. Mazin, H. G. LeDuc, A. Vayonakis, S. Kumar, B. Sadoulet, and J. Zmuidzinas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 152505 (2008). 10 J. M. Martinis, K. B. Cooper, R. McDermott, M. Steffen, M. Ansmann, K. D. Osborn, K. Cicak, S. Oh, D. P. Pappas, R. W. Simmonds, and C. C. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210503 (2005). 11 K. B. Cooper, M. Steffen, R. McDermott, R.W. Simmonds, S. Oh, D. A. Hite, D. P. Pappas, and J. M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180401 (2004). 12 R. W. Simmonds, K. M. Lang, D. A. Hite, S. Nam, D. P. Pappas, and J. M. Martinis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 077003 (2004). 13 A. D. O Connell, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, N. Katz, E. Lucero, C. McKenney, M. Neeley, H. Wang, E. M. Weig, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 112903 (2008). 14 H. Paik and K. D. Osborn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 072505 (2010). 15 M. Göppl, A. Fragner, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, S. Filipp, J. M. Fink, P. J. Leek, G. Puebla, L. Steffen, and A. Wallraff, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 113904 (2008). 16 K. Cicak, M. S. Allman, J. A. Strong, K. D. Osborn, and R. W. Simmonds, IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity. 19, 948 (2009). 17 J. A. Strong, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado (2010). 8