Induced Seismicity: Can it Happen in Kentucky Too?

Similar documents
1. Why do earthquakes happen? 3. What type of mechanical waves are Primary or P waves? 4. What type of mechanical waves are Secondary or S waves?

FAQs - Earthquakes Induced by Fluid Injection

Earthquake. earthquake, epicenters in the U.S. Kobe, Japan deaths

earthquakes 1. Earthquakes occur when plates grind against one another along cracks called faults.

An earthquake can cause:

New USGS Maps Identify Potential Ground- Shaking Hazards in 2017

EPS 20: Earthquakes. Laboratory Exercise 1. Intensity

Julie Shemeta, MEQ Geo Inc., WCEE Webinar 1/13/2016 1/14/2016

Technical Considerations Associated with Risk Management of Induced Seismicity in Waste-Water Disposal & Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Enhanced remote earthquake triggering at fluid injection sites in the Midwestern US

Recent Earthquakes in Oklahoma. and Potential for Induced Seismicity Austin Holland Oklahoma State Seismologist

3D Finite Element Modeling of fault-slip triggering caused by porepressure

Mw 7.8, Southwest of Sumatra, Indonesia Wed, 2 March 2016 at 12:49:48 UTC M /03/03

#13 Earthquake Prediction

ENVI.2030L - Earthquakes

Earthquake. What is it? Can we predict it?

Ivan Wong Seismic Hazards Group AECOM Oakland, CA. IEAGHG Monitoring Network Meeting. 10 June 2015

Earthquakes. Dr. Mark van der Meijde INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION

COMPARING AND COMMUNICATING THE SEISMIC RISKS OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OF SHALE FOR NATURAL GAS OCTOBER 2014 GWPC ANNUAL FORUM SEATTLE, WA

Unraveling the Mysteries of Seismicity in Oklahoma. A Story Map

INDUCED SEISMICITY AND THE O&G INDUSTRY

Assessment and Mitigation of Ground Motion Hazards from Induced Seismicity. Gail M. Atkinson

Seismicity in Texas in Relation to Active Class I Underground Injection Control Wells: Preliminary Observations

Risk Management of Induced Seismicity: Technical Elements & Research Opportunities

Identifying the causes and effects of earthquakes

Dallas-Fort Worth and Cleburne, TX

MINIMIZING AND MANAGING POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY FROM CLASS II DISPOSAL WELLS: PRACTICAL APPROACHES

20.1 Earthquakes. Chapter 20 EARTHQUAKES AND VOLCANOES. Earthquakes and plate boundaries 500 UNIT 6 EARTH S STRUCTURE

Passive seismic monitoring in unconventional oil and gas

II Seismic waves: Nearly- pure elasic waves

What is an Earthquake?

11/30/16 EARTHQUAKES ELASTIC LIMIT FAULT FORCE AND PLATES WHAT DO YOU NOTICE?

USGS: USGS: NEIC NEIC

Table One: Induced seismicity since 2011 in five previously aseismic Ohio counties. Locality County Year Induced Recorded Reference

FOURTH GRADE HAZARDS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

What s Shaking in the Barnett Shale? STEP Dallas, August 11, 2015

Magnitude 6.3, NORTH OF MOROCCO

Measuring the Size of an Earthquake

From an earthquake perspective, 2011 was. Managing the Seismic Risk Posed by Wastewater Disposal. 38 EARTH April

Satellite Image. False-color IR satellite view of basins and ranges north of Snake River Plain Lost River Rangelower. Lemhi Range-upper.

Earthquakes and Seismic Waves Lesson 4 2

Finite element modelling of fault stress triggering due to hydraulic fracturing

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Earthquakes and Earth s Chapter. Interior

Regulatory Considerations for Evaluating the Potential for Induced Seismicity of a Class I Non-Hazardous Disposal Well

White Paper II Summarizing a Special Session on Induced Seismicity

Concerns About the Poten/al for Induced Seismicity Associated with the Mississippian Play: Perceived or Real?

The Stability Of Fault Systems In The South Shore Of The. St. Lawrence Lowlands Of Québec Implications For Shale Gas Development

The Richter Scale. Micro Less than 2.0 Microearthquakes, not felt. About 8,000/day

Dynamic Crust Regents Review

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Environmental Groups Warn Oklahoma Fracking Operators of Potential Legal Action

Earthquakes Science & Safety. Dr. Richard Robertson Geologist & Head Seismic Research Unit

Earthquakes in Canada

Update on Acton Extension Application

Earthquakes Science & Safety. Ms Joan L. Latchman Seismologist Seismic Research Unit

Human-Induced Earthquakes from Deep-Well Injection: A Brief Overview

Magnitude 7.2 OAXACA, MEXICO

Kansas Underground Injection Control Program & Induced Seismicity. By: Benjamin Busboom Stinson Leonard Street

BRIEFING MEMO ON RESERVOIR TRIGGERED SEISMICITY (RTS)

I. What are Earthquakes?

Leveraging Cross-Disciplinary Science for Induced Seismicity Risk Management

SEISMOLOGY. - The study of earthquakes waves and how they move through the body and around the surface of the earth.

IMPACT OF INDUCED SEISMICITY ON THE EVALUATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD

Earthquake Damage Scenario

How to Use This Presentation

An entire branch of Earth science, called, is devoted to the study of earthquakes.

The January 6, Divide Colorado Earthquake

What We Know (and don t know)

Geomechanical Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Induced Seismicity at Duvernay Field in Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin

Characterizing and Responding to Seismic Risk Associated with Earthquakes Potentially Triggered by Saltwater Disposal and Hydraulic Fracturing

Earthquake Investigation

White Paper on Induced Seismicity Related to Oil and Gas Development

Dam Safety Aspects of Reservoir-Triggered Seismicity

Earthquake Measurements

EARTHQUAKES AND EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES. Er. K. S. BHARGAV LECTURER Department of Civil Engineering, GGSGP CHEEKA

Note: Long-duration shaking with dominant horizontal component is the most damaging to buildings!

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

Magnitude 7.5 PALU, INDONESIA

An Investigation on the Effects of Different Stress Regimes on the Magnitude Distribution of Induced Seismic Events

Induced Seismicity Risks

Marcellus Shale Gas Play Tetra Tech Capabilities

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated with Oil & Gas Development:

Seismicity and the SWD-C4A well: An ongoing UIC case study in the Denver Basin, Colorado

Released Science Inquiry Task Location Grade 11

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

Figure Diagram of earth movements produced by (a) P-waves and (b) S-waves.

Lecture Outline Wednesday-Monday April 18 23, 2018

Risk Evaluation. Todd Shipman PhD, Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy Regulator November 17 th,2017 Induced Seismicity Workshop, Yellowknife NWT

Technical Considerations Associated with Risk Management of Potential Induced Seismicity in Injection Operations

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

SLOPE PROCESSES, LANDSLIDES, AND SUBSIDENCE

ES Ch 19 Earthquakes 1

Is It Safe to Frack Beneath Lake Lewisville?

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

Earthquakes An introduction to earthquake monitoring techniques


appendix e: geologic and seismic hazards

Transcription:

Induced Seismicity: Can it Happen in Kentucky Too? Seth Carpenter Seismologist Geologic Hazards Section 2015 KGS Annual Seminar

Outline - What s the problem? - Earthquake magnitude - Types of induced seismic events - Cases of earthquakes induced by fluid-injection - What KGS is doing to address this issue

What s the problem? (http://news.sciencemag.org/earth/2015/04/heartland-danger-zones-emerge-new-u-s-earthquake-hazard-map)

What s the problem? http://www.courier-journal.com/story/watchdog-earth/2015/04/25/usgs-more-convinced-oil-and-gas-drillingproduces-earthquakes-as-kentucky-makes-fracking-move/26355365/

Earthquake: Magnitude How does magnitude relate to experienced effects? (http://www.iris.edu/hq/files/publications/brochures_onepagers/doc/en_onepager3.pdf)

fracking Earthquake: Magnitude How does fault size relate to magnitude? M 7.8 ~9,300 km 2 M 7.3 ~660 km 2 M 5 ~10 km 2 M 4 ~1 km 2 M 2 ~0.04 km 2 (~0.015 mi 2 ) M 1 ~0.01 km 2 (~0.004 mi 2 ) M -1 ~0.001 km 2 (~0.0004 mi 2 ) M -2 ~1-9 m 2 (~100 ft 2 )

Types of induced-seismic events: The study of anthropogenic seismicity began when earthquakes were felt in Johannesburg in 1894. Cause: gold production that began in 1886. Earthquakes can be induced* by (anthropogenic) activities related to: - Mines - Quarries - Reservoir loading - Fluid injection (fracking/wastewater) - Fluid extraction - Enhanced geothermal production (McGarr et al., 2002) * - induced, or triggered

Types of induced-seismic events: Mine Blasts and Roof Falls Kentucky has had plenty of experience with induced seismicity. HZKY HZKY (Street et al., 2002) M 2.4 M 2.5 M 2.6

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Extraction Oil production from 1993 1995, Clinton Co., Kentucky > 3,500 micro-earthquakes (M -2.5 to 0.9) (Rutledge et al., 1998)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction To induce an earthquake with fluid injection (or extraction), we need the right ingredients: - Injected fluids: fracking and wastewater - Pre-existing faults, oriented for failure in the tectonic stress conditions - Pathway from injection location to faults - Enough time and volume for pressure to overcome fault strength There are 100,000s of wastewater injection wells operating; very few have been associated with seismicity (Hornback et al., 2015) unfavorable condition

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Central and eastern U.S. earthquake rate increased rapidly at a time corresponding with the shale-gas boom M 3.0 Quakes 1970 2007 (From Ellsworth, 2013, Science)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Central and eastern U.S. earthquake rate increased rapidly at a time corresponding with the shale-gas boom 2008 M 3.0 Quakes 1970 2007 2008 2014 (From Ellsworth, 2013, Science)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Felt-cases of probable and unambiguous injectioninduced-seismicity reported in the literature: Fracking Waste-water injection 2008 M 3.0 Quakes 1970 2007 2008 2014 (From Ellsworth, 2013, Science) 2001 Ashtabula, OH M 3.9 2010 Braxton Co., WV M 3.4 2014 S. KS / N. OK M 4.9 2013 Azle, TX M 3.4 1997 AL / KY M 4.9

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Felt-cases of probable and unambiguous injectioninduced-seismicity reported in the literature: Fracking Waste-water injection 2008 M 3.0 Quakes 1970 2007 2008 2014 (From Ellsworth, 2013, Science) 2001 Ashtabula, OH M 3.9 2010 Braxton Co., WV M 3.4 2014 S. KS / N. OK M 4.9 2013 Azle, TX M 3.4 1997 AL / KY M 4.9

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction 2010-2011 Arkansas (M 4.7) = wastewater injection well = induced earthquakes Cross Section View (Horton, 2012)

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky: Can Induced Seismicity Happen in Kentucky? Well, yes* * - Mining-related - Microseismicity (e.g. Clinton Co. example) Will Kentucky have a problem (felt, or damaging events)?

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky: - KGS has begun a collaborative project to study this issue in eastern Kentucky - - Purpose: collect new data Establish background levels of natural, small-magnitude earthquakes Determine if oil- and gas-development and wastewater-injection activities in the state cause low-level seismicity to occur Identify characteristics that discriminate between natural and manmade seismic events. - Collaborators: Nanometrics, Inc. - Instrumentation and research and 1:1 station match Earth and Environmental Science Dept. Oil and Gas industry?

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky:

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky:

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky:

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky:

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky Project Status - Purchased seven seismic stations from Nanometrics - Established project participation: - Nanometrics (at least 1:1 station match) - Earth and Environmental Science Dept. - Sited locations for all 14 stations - Continue to seek industry partners

Can induced seismicity happen in Kentucky? Yes: - Thank You - - Kentucky is no stranger to induced seismicity - By definition, fracking induces (micro) earthquakes But: - Increased oil and gas production and wastewater injection could increase the likelihood of felt-events Need the right ingredients! KGS is investigating this issue by collecting new data to: Establish background levels of natural micro-earthquakes Monitor low-level induced seismicity Discriminate between the natural and manmade events.

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Felt-cases of probable and unambiguous injectioninduced-seismicity reported in the literature: Fracking Waste-water injection 2008 M 3.0 Quakes 1970 2007 2008 2014 (From Ellsworth, 2013, Science) 2001 Ashtabula, OH M 3.9 2010 Braxton Co., WV M 3.4 2014 S. KS / N. OK M 4.9 2013 Azle, TX M 3.4 1997 AL / KY M 4.9

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction 2011 Oklahoma M 5.6 http://www.newson6.com/story/15972590/earthquakedamages-historic-building-at-university-in-shawnee http://www.usgs.gov/blogs/features/usgs_top_story/manmade-earthquakes/

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky: Typical station layout

Monitoring Microseismicity in Eastern Kentucky: Magnitude Threshold M < 1 in particular regions Preliminary result for 9 stations (for illustration purposes only)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Guy-Greenbrier, Arkansas, 2010-2011 Rocky Mountain Arsenal, 1960s (Horton, 2012) (National Research Council, 2013)

Seismic Event: Magnitude How does magnitude relate to injection? (McGarr et al., 2014) (McGarr et al., 2002)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction Fracking and Induced Seismicity (Wessels et al., 2011)

Types of induced-seismic events: Which anthropogenic activities most frequently cause earthquakes and of what magnitude? Note: This figure presents only published results 1. Mining 2. Oil & Gas extraction 3. Reservoir impoundment 5. Waste disposal 8. Fracking (Davies et al., 2013)

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection

KRS 351.330: Requirements governing blasting operations In all blasting operations, except as hereinafter otherwise provided, the maximum peak particle velocity of the ground motion in any direction shall not exceed two (2) inches per second at the immediate location of any dwelling house, public building, school, church, commercial or institutional building, and the particle velocity at such location immediately after a period of one (1) second following the peak particle velocity produced by any charge shall not continuously exceed one-half (1/2) inch per second. This level of shaking (5 cm/s) is considered (MMI) Intensity V shaking

2 /s = 5 cm/s = (MMI) Intensity V: IV. Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Heavy vibration, a sensation like a heavy truck striking building. Standing motorcars rocked noticeably. V. Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop.

Types of induced-seismic events: Fluid Injection / Extraction (Davies et al., 2013)