11th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors 1-4/10/2008, Siena, Italy

Similar documents
New Calibrations and Time Stability. of the Response of the INTERCAST CR-39

Magnetic monopoles, nuclearites, Q-balls: a qualitative picture

Magnetic Monopole Searches

Fragmentation cross sections of 158 A GeV Pb ions in various targets measured with CR39 nuclear track detectors

Nuclear track detectors in particle, astroparticle and nuclear physics

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 Oct 2006

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

The interaction of radiation with matter

SEARCH FOR NUCLEARITES WITH THE ANTARES DETECTOR *

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Atomic and nuclear physics

Chapter V: Interactions of neutrons with matter

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Particle accelerators

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

The ATLAS Experiment and the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Study of muon bundles from extensive air showers with the ALICE detector at CERN LHC

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

The discovery of the antiproton and other antimatter,

Quark nuggets search using gravitational waves aluminum bar detectors

Passage of particles through matter

Experimental Methods of Particle Physics

CR-39 TRACK DETECTORS IN COLD FUSION EXPERIMENTS: REVIEW AND PERSPECTIVES. A. S. Roussetski

CRaTER Science Requirements

High Energy Frontier Recent Results from the LHC: Heavy Ions I

Discovery of muon neutrino

High Energy Particle Production by Space Plasmas

Particle-Matter Interactions

The Discovery of the Higgs Boson: one step closer to understanding the beginning of the Universe

INTRODUCTION TO IONIZING RADIATION (Attix Chapter 1 p. 1-5)

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Year- 1 (Heavy- Ion) Physics with CMS at the LHC

Radio-chemical method

Particle Interactions in Detectors

Comparison of UHECR spectra from necklaces and vortons

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

A Helium-3 polarimeter using electromagnetic interference. Nigel Buttimore

Comparison of UHECR spectra from necklaces and vortons

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

Unravelling the Mysteries of Matter with the CERN Large Hadron Collider An Introduction/Overview of Particle Physics

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

High Energy Physics. QuarkNet summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2016

The God particle at last? Astronomy Ireland, Oct 8 th, 2012

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Detectors for High Energy Physics

Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential

Neutral particles energy spectra for 900 GeV and 7 TeV p-p collisions, measured by the LHCf experiment

Dedicated Arrays: MEDEA GDR studies (E γ = MeV) Highly excited CN E*~ MeV, 4 T 8 MeV

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 23 Mar 2015

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Topic 7. Relevance to the course

The Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon

Chap. 19 Miscellaneous Detectors

Polarizing Helium-3 for down quark spin enrichment. Nigel Buttimore

TeV Particle Physics and Physics Beyond the Standard Model

Overview. The quest of Particle Physics research is to understand the fundamental particles of nature and their interactions.

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Directional Dark Matter Search with the Fine Grained Nuclear Emulsion

Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Geant4 simulations of the lead fluoride calorimeter

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Lecture 14 (11/1/06) Charged-Particle Interactions: Stopping Power, Collisions and Ionization

Particle Physics (concise summary) QuarkNet summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

- ~200 times heavier than the e GeV µ travels on average. - does not interact strongly. - does emit bremsstrahlung in

Preliminary results of SI2 experiment obtained by PADC track etch detectors J. Szabó, J. K. Pálfalvi, B. Dudás

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 7 Apr 2017

Properties of the nucleus. 9.1 Nuclear Physics. Isotopes. Stable Nuclei. Size of the nucleus. Size of the nucleus

The Physics of Cosmic Rays

The Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays and New Cosmological Problems

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Mapping the Nuclear Matter Phase Diagram with STAR: Au+Al at 2.8 AGeV and Au+Au at 19.6 GeV

Detectors in Nuclear Physics (48 hours)

Interaction with matter

14 Top Quark. Completing the Third Generation

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Weak Interactions. The Theory of GLASHOW, SALAM and WEINBERG

First some Introductory Stuff => On The Web.

What is the HIGGS BOSON and why does physics need it?

Neutrino detection. Kate Scholberg, Duke University International Neutrino Summer School Sao Paulo, Brazil, August 2015

Detectors for astroparticle physics

FACULTY OF SCIENCE. High Energy Physics. WINTHROP PROFESSOR IAN MCARTHUR and ADJUNCT/PROFESSOR JACKIE DAVIDSON

The Gamma Factory proposal for CERN

Chapter 22: Cosmology - Back to the Beginning of Time

EXPERIMENT 11: NUCLEAR RADIATION

High-p T Neutral Pion Production in Heavy Ion Collisions at SPS and RHIC

Energy Spectrum of all Electrons and Positron Fraction

Magnetic Monopole Searches

Transcription:

11th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors 1-4//008, Siena, Italy The nuclear track detector CR39: results from different experiments M. Giorgini Bologna University and INFN 1

The Nuclear Track Detectors (NTDs) tecnique A very ionizing particle breaks the polimeric bonds around its trajectory. The produced damage is called latent track The latent track becomes visible and measurable after a chemical etching in a basic solution 00 A GeV S16+ Two (etch-pits) cones with the same dimensions or a hole develop around the particle trajectory

The nuclear track detector CR39 The most sensitive NTD employed in several scientific and technological applications is CR39 (PPG Ind. Inc.) More than 00 m of CR39 detectors were used in the MACRO [Eur. Phys. Jou. C 5 (00) 511] and SLIM experiments to search for massive rare particles in the cosmic radiation (magnetic monopoles, nuclearites, strangelets, Q-balls...) C1H18O7 ρ = 1.3 g/cm3 Accurate detector calibrations are required3

CR39 calibrations CR39 Detectors Fragments Incident beam Survived beam Fragments Target 50 cm Target CR39 Air gap Beams : 158 AGeV Pb8+ @ CERN-SPS 158 AGeV In49+ After exposure, the CR39 sheets were etched in 6N NaOH + 1% ethyl alcohol solution at 70 C for 40 h 4

Automatic and manual measurements Automatic image analyzer ELBEK (A. Noll et al., Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 15 (1988) 65) The base area, eccentricity and brightness are measured for each track Tracking : the trajectory of each ion is followed through the stack D L = (vt vb )t L (v T v B ) D = vbt (v T + v B ) D = 1+ 4 t L vb 4L 1 + D D and L are measured with a Leica optical microscope coupled to a CCD camera and a video monitor L is obtained multiplying the measured cone height by the 5 refractive index of the detector

Height and base area of conical tracks in CR39 exposed normally to In49+ and Pb8+ ions Z/β=75-8 Z/β=5 Z/β= Z/β=8 Z/β=80 Z/β=75 Z/β=83 Z/β=0 Z/β=30 Z/β= Z/β=46-49 Z/β=30 Z/β=40 Number of events Z/β=0 Z/β=49 Z/β=46 Cone height (arbitrary units) 6 Track area (pixel)

Best charge resolution Charge distribution for tracks present in at least out of 1 measured CR39 sheets located after the target σz = 0.05e 7

Calibration graph for CR39 Reduced etch rate p=vt/vb For each detected charge Restricted Energy Loss (REL) p=vt/vb de z Z 1 me c β γ Tmax δ REL= = K ln β I β A dx E< Tmax A unique calibration curve describes all the data REL (MeV cm g ) -1 8

Fragmentation cross sections of Fe6+, Si14+ e C6+ ions on CR39, CH and Al targets Nucl. Phys. A 807 (008) 06 Beam : Fe6+ (E = 0.3, 0.41, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 AGeV) Si14+ (E = 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 AGeV) C6+ (E = 0.9 AGeV) Exposures @ BNL-AGS and HIMAC (Japan) CR39 sheets : area 11.5 11.5 cm thickness 0.65 mm Targets : CH, Al, CR39 thickness 1 mm After exposure, the CR39 sheets were etched in 6N NaOH aqueous solution at 70 C for 30 h 9

Total fragmentation cross sections AT ln(nin/nout) σtot = ρt tt NAV AT = mass number of the target ρt = density of the target tt = thickness of the target NAV = Avogadro's number Nin = number of incident ions before the target Nout = number of incident ions after the target Theoretical predictions : σ tot = σ nucl + σ EMD = π ro ( AT1 3 + A1P 3 bo ) + α ZTδ ZT = atomic number of the target Ap = mass number of the beam ro = 1.31 fm bo = 1.0 α = 1.57 δ = 1.9

Data-prediction comparison Fe6+ on CH [ Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 388 ] [ Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 388 ] Total cross section (mb) Total cross section (mb) Fe6+ on Al [ Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 388 ] [ Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 388 ] Target mass AT Total cross section (mb) Total cross section (mb) [ Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 388 ] Si14+ on Al Si14+ on CR39 Si14+ on CH [ Radiat. Meas. 34 (001) 37 ] [ Nucl. Phys. A 784 (007) 341 ] [ Nucl. Phys. A 784 (007) 341 ] [ Phys. Rev. C 39 (1989) ] [ Nucl. Phys. A 784 (007) 341 ] [ Phys. Rev. C 39 (1989) ] 0.9 A GeV C Present work [ Phys. Rev. C 66 (00) 014609 ] Target mass AT The quoted uncertainties are statistical standard deviations 11

Partial charge changing cross sections Average base areas for tracks present in at least out of 3 measured CR39 sheets located after the target Charge resolution σ ~ 0.e Z Z σ Z (mb) σ Z (mb) -1 - -3-4 -5-6 -7-8 -9 - -11-1 -13-14 338 ± 11 85 ± 11 5 ± 49 ± 197 ± 9 168 ± 8 13 ± 7 175 ± 8 7 ± 7 15 ± 6 5 ± 8 3 ± 6 81 ± 6 93 ± 18 177 ± 1 13 ± 11 1 ± 11 6 ± 8 117 ± 11 83 ± 9 90 ± -15 80 ± 6-16 50 ± 4-17 76 ± 5-18 86 ± 6 Partial charge changing cross sections for 1 AGeV Si14+ and 1 AGeV Fe6+ ions on the CH target 1

The SLIM experiment Chacaltaya laboratory (Bolivia, 530 m a.s.l.) Search for LIght Monopoles Intermediate mass (5 MM 1 GeV) Magnetic Monopoles Strange Quark Matter (nuclearites, strangelets) Charged Q-balls 13

Intermediate Mass Monopoles (IMMs) SO() 15 GeV 9 GeV SU(4) x SU()L x SU()R -35 s -3 s Virtual vector bosons X, Y? Electroweak Unification W, Z SU(3)C x [SU()L x U(1)Y]EW IMMs 5-1 GeV GeV - s Kephard, Shafi.et. al SU(3)C x U(1)EM Virtual photons and gluons Confinement region Magnetic field of a point MM A. De Rujula, CERN-TH 773/94 E. Huguet and P. Peter, hep-ph/ 901370 T. W. Kephart and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B 50 (001) 313 S. D. Wick et al., Astropart. Phys. 18 (003) 663-5 -16-13 Radius (m) liquid H Energy losses of IMMs (a) β < -4 Elastic collisions (b) -4 < β < - Excitation (Medium as Fermi gas) (c) β > - Ionization (Bethe-Bloch) (Zeeq) = (gβ) 14

Strange Quark Matter (SQM) Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 7 ; Nature 31 (1984) 734 Aggregates of u, d, s quarks + electrons, n = /3 n 1/3 n 1/3 n Candidates for cold Dark Matter! Searched for in cosmic rays reaching the Earth e u d s [black points are electrons] R (fm) 3 4 M (GeV) ev 300 Z=1, A=580 Z=46, A=00 5 6 15 18 6-7 (b) ~ 57 4 x Z=14, A=300 1 Z=17, A=400 < N REL (MeVg cm ) 5 9 8. = M 17 14 AG (u.m.a.) N M = 6 6 ev 19 G ev qualitative picture (hep-ex/0004019) G 7 A 4 N M -1 s, ite ar N uc le -1 REL (MeV g cm ) Nuclearites : large neutral SQM bags. Core of u, d and s quarks with an electron cloud Typical galactic velocities : β -3 Dominant interaction: elastic collisions with atoms in the medium 4 3 g Strangelets : small charged SQM snuggets =,g o le op n Behave like ordinary nuclei same acceleration processes and energy loss Mo CR39Very Threshold low charge to mass Z/A ratio 3 D CR39 Threshold 1-5 -4-3 β REL vs β of nuclearites in CR39 - -5-4 -3 - β -1 0 15 REL vs β of strangelets in CR39

Q-balls Nucl. Phys. B 6 (1985) 63 ; Phys. Lett. B418 (1998) 46 Super-symmetric coherent states of squarks, sleptons and Higgs fields Candidates for Dark Matter! - Neutral Q-balls (SENS) : the main interaction process is the catalysis of proton decay. Not relevant for NTDs. - Charged Q-balls (SECS) are similar to nuclearites and strangelets and behave like ordinary nuclei same interaction processes Z = 13e A qualitative picture (hep-ex/0004019) -1 REL (MeVg cm ) Q SECS (charged) 3 ZQ =1e SENS (neutral) CR39 Threshold [black points are electrons, empty dots are s-electrons] -5-4 β -3 - REL vs β of SECS in CR39 16

The detector Nuclear track detectors Absorber Total area ~ 440 m One module (4.5 4.5 cm) 17

The search technique Strong etching* (large tracks, easy to detect) General scan of the top surface Soft etching** Scan in the predicted position measurement of REL and direction of incident particle. * 8N KOH + 1.5% Ethyl alcohol at 70 C for 30 h ** 6N NaOH + 1% Ethyl alcohol at 70 C for 40 h No candidate passed the search criteria 18

Upper limits for downgoing IMMs and dyons Flux upper limit (cm- s-1 sr-1) Analyzed area : 47 m Average exposure time : 4. years 90% C.L. upper limits for a downgoing flux of IMMs with g = gd, gd, 3gD and for dyons (M+p) : 1.3. -15 cm- s-1 sr-1 for β 4. - 19

Upper limits for nuclearites and charged Q-balls 90% C.L. upper limits for a downgoing flux of NUCLEARITES and charged Q-balls : 1.3. -15 cm- s-1 sr-1 for β > -4-14 - -1-1 Flux upper Limit (cm sr s ) -15-5 -4-3 β - 0

CONCLUSIONS The nuclear track detector CR39 was calibrated with different ions of different energies. A unique curve of p vs REL describes all the data. The best charge resolution obtained is σz ~ 0.05e. The total and partial fragmentation cross sections for Fe6+, Si14+ and C6+ ions on polyethylene, CR39 and aluminum targets were measured using CR39 The total cross sections for all the targets and energies used in the present work do not show any observable energy dependence There is a dependence on target mass, mainly due to the contribution of electromagnetic dissociation The SLIM experiment (47 m of CR39, with an average exposure time of 4. y) set 90% C.L. upper limits for a downgoing flux of : IMMs with g = gd, gd, 3gD and dyons : 1.3. -15 cm- s-1 sr -1 for β 4. - Nuclearites and strangelets : 1.3. -15 cm- s-1 sr -1 for β -4 Charged Q-balls : 1.3. -15 cm- s-1 sr-1 for β -4 1

SLIM scan L1 scan 3 X Mag, stereo microscope; scanned twice ~ 99% 0 40 X Mag L5 scan: 500 00 X Mag Coincidence area ~ 0.5 cm Measured with 6.3ob X 5oc Mag Event p and θ are equal within 0 %